Transboundary Sub Parts of Groundwater Bodies in the Pripyat and Dnieper River Basin of the Republic of Belarus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Transboundary Sub Parts of Groundwater Bodies in the Pripyat and Dnieper River Basin of the Republic of Belarus European Union Water Initiative Plus for the Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+) Result 2 TRANSBOUNDARY SUB PARTS OF GROUNDWATER BODIES IN THE PRIPYAT AND DNIEPER RIVER BASIN OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS Final report, December 2020 Transboundary sub parts of GWBs in Belarus Beneficiaries Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection of the Republic of Belarus Responsible EU member state consortium EUWI+ project leader Mr Alexander Zinke, Umweltbundesamt GmbH (AT) EUWI+ country representative in Belarus Mr Alexandr Stankevich Responsible international thematic lead expert Mr Andreas Scheidleder, Umweltbundesamt (AT) Responsible national thematic lead expert Ms Olga Vasneva, “The Institute of Geology” branch of the Republican Unitary Enterprise "Research and Production Center for Geology” Authors Ms Olga Berezko, Ms Olga Vasneva, Ms Elena Cherevach, Ms Olga Buinevich, Ms Tatiana Kononova, Mr Igor Vitsen, all “The Institute of Geology” branch of the Republican Unitary Enterprise "Research and Pro- duction Center for Geology" Disclaimer: The EU-funded program European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+) is im- plemented by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), both responsible for the implementation of Result 1, and an EU Mem- ber States Consortium comprising the Environment Agency Austria (UBA, Austria), the lead coordinator, and the International Office for Water (IOW, France), both responsible for the implementation of Results 2 and 3. The program is co-funded by Austria and France through the Austrian Development Agency and the French Artois-Picardie Water Agency. This document was produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union or of the Governments of the Eastern Partnership Countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of, or sovereignty over, any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries, and to the name of any territory, city or area. Imprint Owner and Editor: EU Member State Consortium Umweltbundesamt GmbH Office International de l’Eau (IOW) Spittelauer Lände 5 21/23 rue de Madrid 1090 Vienna, Austria 75008 Paris, France Responsible IOW Communication officer: Ms Chloé Déchelette [email protected] December2020 2 Transboundary sub parts of GWBs in Belarus CONTENTS 1 Executive summary ............................................................................................................................ 9 2 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 10 3 Applied approach and research methodologies ............................................................................... 11 4 Transboundary GWBs in the Dnieper River Basin – Identification and Characterisation ................ 14 4.1 General information about the Dnieper river basin ................................................................... 14 4.1.1 Geological and hydrogeological conditions .................................................................... 15 4.1.2 Significant ecosystems ................................................................................................... 17 4.1.3 Anthropogenic impacts ................................................................................................... 17 4.2 Characteristics of the transboundary GWBs in the Dnieper river basin and the corresponding GWBs in Ukraine .............................................................................................. 19 4.2.1 Groundwater body BYDNGW0001................................................................................. 21 4.2.2 Groundwater body BYDNGW0002................................................................................. 22 4.2.3 Groundwater body BYDNGW0003................................................................................. 23 4.2.4 Groundwater body BYDNGW004................................................................................... 24 4.2.5 Groundwater body BYDNGW005................................................................................... 25 5 Identification and characterization of the transboundary sub-parts of GWBs in the Dnieper and Pripyat river basins in Belarus ................................................................................................... 27 5.1 Basis and criteria for the identification ...................................................................................... 27 5.2 Characteristics of the transboundary sub-parts of GWBs in the Dnieper and Pripyat river basins in Belarus ...................................................................................................................... 28 5.2.1 Transboundary sub-parts of BYPRGW0001 (Pripyat river) and BYDNGW0001 (Dnieper river)................................................................................................................. 30 5.2.2 Transboundary sub-parts of BYPRGW0002 (Pripyat river) and BYDNGW0002 (Dnieper river)................................................................................................................. 32 5.2.3 Transboundary sub-parts of BYPRGW0005 (Pripyat river) and BYDNGW0003 groundwater bodies (Dnieper river) ................................................................................ 35 5.2.4 Transboundary sub-parts of groundwater bodies BYPRGW0006 (Pripyat river) and BYDNGW0004 (Dnieper river) ................................................................................ 37 5.2.5 Transboundary sub-parts of BYPRGW0007 (Pripyat river) and BYDNGW0005 groundwater bodies (Dnieper river) ................................................................................ 40 5.2.6 Transboundary sub-part of the BYPRGW0009 groundwater body (Pripyat river) ......... 43 6 Existing Groundwater monitoring network ....................................................................................... 45 6.1 Existing monitoring network of the transboundary sub-part of BYPRGW0001 (Pripyat river) and BYDNGW0001 groundwater bodies (Dnieper river) ................................................ 56 6.2 Transboundary sub-parts of BYPRGW0002 (the Pripyat river) and BYDNGW0002 (the Dnieper river) groundwater bodies ........................................................................................... 57 6.3 Transboundary sub-parts of BYPRGW0005 (the Pripyat river) and BYDNGW0003 (the Dnieper river) groundwater bodies ........................................................................................... 59 Transboundary sub parts of GWBs in Belarus 6.4 Transboundary sub-part of BYPRGW0006 (the Pripyat river) and BYDNGW0004 (the Dnieper river) groundwater bodies ........................................................................................... 60 6.5 Transboundary sub-part of BYPRGW0007 (the Pripyat river) and BYDNGW0005 (the Dnieper river) groundwater bodies ........................................................................................... 61 6.6 Transboundary sub-part of BYPRGW0009 (the Pripyat river) ................................................. 63 7 Proposed Groundwater monitoring network and data exchange ..................................................... 64 7.1 Proposed new monitoring sites ................................................................................................ 64 7.2 General organizational issues of groundwater monitoring in the transboundary territory of Belarus and Ukraine ............................................................................................................. 69 7.3 Observation frequency and parameters ................................................................................... 69 7.4 Proposed monitoring data exchange template ......................................................................... 70 8 Outputs and lessons learned ............................................................................................................ 72 8.1 Outputs ..................................................................................................................................... 72 8.2 Lessons learned ....................................................................................................................... 74 9 References ....................................................................................................................................... 76 4 Transboundary sub parts of GWBs in Belarus List of Tables Table 1: Fresh groundwater resources in the Dnieper basin (according to data for 2017).............. 16 Table 2: List of delineated transboundary GWBs in the Dnieper river basin in Belarus .................. 20 Table 3: Comparison of joint transboundary GWBs in the territory of Belarus and Ukraine ............ 20 Table 4: Transboundary sub-parts of GWBs in the Dnieper and Pripyat river basin in Belarus ...... 28 Table 5: Types of anthropogenic pressures on fresh groundwater of the transboundary subparts of GWBs in the Pripyat and Dnieper river basin in Belarus ....................................... 29 Table 6: Statistical data on hydrogeological stations on transboundary sub-parts of the territory of the Pripyat river basin in Belarus............................................................................. 46 Table
Recommended publications
  • Subbuteo.No.10.Pdf
    ПРАВИЛА ДЛЯ АВТОРОВ (Tomialojc 1990)», либо «по сообщению В.А.Лысенко (1988) и Л.Томялойца (Tomialojc, 1990), данный вид 1) В бюллетене «Subbuteo» публикуются статьи и встречает-ся на осеннем пролете в Украине и Поль- краткие сообщения по всем проблемам орнитологии, ше». материалы полевых исследований, а также обзорные работы. Принимаются рукописи объемом до 10 стра- в списке литературы: ниц машинописи. Работы более крупного объема мо- книги: Паевский В.А. Демография птиц. — Л., 1985. гут быть приняты к опубликованию при специальном- –285 с. согласовании с редакционной коллегией. статьи: Ивановский И.И. Прошлое, настоящее и бу- 2) Статьи объемом более 1 стр. машинописи при- дущее сапсана в Беларуси // Труды Зоол. музея БГУ, т. нимаются только в электронном варианте. 1,–Минск, 1995. –с. 295–301. 3) Статьи и заметки объемом до 1 стр. принимают- тезисы: Самусенко И.Э. Аистообразные — эталон- ся либо в электронном, либо в машинописном вари- но-индикационная группа птиц // Материалы 10-й антах. Текст должен быть напечатан на белой бумаге Всесоюзн. орнитол. конф., ч. 2, кн. 2. — Минск, 1991. стандартного формата А4 (21 х 30 см) через 2 интерва- –с. 197–198. ла, не более 60 знаков в строке и 30 строк на странице. Редакция оставляет за собой право редактирова- Статьи, сообщения и заметки в рукописном вари- ния рукописей. Корректура иногородним авторам не анте принимаются только в виде исключения от орни- высылается. Возможно возвращение рукописей на тологов-любителей, студентов и учащихся. доработку. 4) Текст работы должен быть оформлен в следую- В одном номере бюллетеня публикуется, как пра- щем порядке: вило, не более двух работ одного автора. Исключение заглавие (заглавными буквами того же шрифта, что может быть сделано для работ в соавторстве.
    [Show full text]
  • Message from the New Chairman
    Subcommission on Devonian Stratigraphy Newsletter No. 21 April, 2005 MESSAGE FROM THE NEW CHAIRMAN Dear SDS Members: This new Newsletter gives me the pleasant opportunity to thank you for your confidence which should allow me to lead our Devonian Subcommission successfully through the next four years until the next International Geological Congress in Norway. Ahmed El Hassani, as Vice-Chairman, and John Marshall, as our new Secretary, will assist and help me. As it has been our habit in the past, our outgoing chairman, Pierre Bultynck, has continued his duties until the end of the calendar year, and in the name of all the Subcommission, I like to express our warmest thanks to him for all his efforts, his enthusi- asm for our tasks, his patience with the often too slow progress of research, and for the humorous, well organized and skil- ful handling of our affairs, including our annual meetings. At the same time I like to thank all our outgoing Titular Members for their partly long-time service and I express my hope that they will continue their SDS work with the same interest and energy as Corresponding Members. The new ICS rules require a rather constant change of voting members and the change from TM to CM status should not necessarily be taken as an excuse to adopt the lifestyle of a “Devonian pensioner”. I see no reason why constantly active SDS members shouldn´t become TM again, at a later stage. On the other side, the rather strong exchange of voting members should bring in some fresh ideas and some shift towards modern stratigraphical tech- niques.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologists of Russian Origin in Latin America
    REVISTA DEL MUSEO DE LA PLATA 2018, Volumen 3, Número 2: 223-295 Geologists of Russian origin in Latin America P. Tchoumatchenco1 , A.C. Riccardi 2 , †M. Durand Delga3 , R. Alonso 4 , 7 8 M. Wiasemsky5 , D. Boltovskoy 6 , R. Charrier , E. Minina 1Geological Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Acad. G. Bonchev Str. Bl. 24, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria, [email protected] 2Museo de La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina, [email protected] 3Passed away August19, 2012 4Universidad Nacional de Salta, Argentina, [email protected] 581, Chemin du Plan de Charlet, F-74190 Passy, France, [email protected] 6Dep. Ecologia, Genetica y Evolucion, Fac. Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Univ. de Buenos Aires, Argentina, [email protected] 7History of Geology Group, Sociedad Geológica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, [email protected] 8State Geological Museum “V.I.Vernadsky”, Mohovaya ul. 11/11, Moscow 125009, Russian Federation, [email protected] REVISTA DEL MUSEO DE LA PLATA / 2018, Volumen 3, Número 2: 223-295 / ISSN 2545-6377 ISSN 2545-6377 UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE LA PLATA - FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS NATURALES Y MUSEO Revista del Museo de La Plata 2018 Volumen 3, Número 2 (Julio-Diciembre): 223-295 Geologists of Russian origin in Latin America P. Tchoumatchenco1, A.C. Riccardi2, †M. Durand Delga3, R. Alonso4, M. Wiasemsky5, D. Boltovskoy6, R. Charrier7, E. Minina8 1 Geological Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Acad. G. Bonchev Str. Bl. 24, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria, [email protected] 2 Museo de La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina, [email protected] 3 Passed away August19, 2012 4 Universidad Nacional de Salta, Argentina, [email protected] 5 81, Chemin du Plan de Charlet, F-74190 Passy, France, [email protected] 6 Dep.
    [Show full text]
  • The Upper Dnieper River Basin Management Plan (Draft)
    This project is funded Ministry of Natural Resources The project is implemented by the European Union and Environmental Protection by a Consortium of the Republic of Belarus led by Hulla & Co. Human Dynamics KG Environmental Protection of International River Basins THE UPPER DNIEPER RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN (DRAFT) Prepared by Central Research Institute for Complex Use of Water Resources, Belarus With assistance of Republican Center on Hydrometeorology, Control of Radioactive Pollution and Monitoring of Environment, Belarus And with Republican Center on Analytical Control in the field of Environmental Protection, Belarus February 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS.........................................................................................................................4 1.1 Outline of EU WFD aims and how this is addressed with the upper Dnieper RBMP ..........6 1.2 General description of the upper Dnieper RBMP..................................................................6 CHAPTER 2 CHARACTERISTIC OF DNIEPER RIVER BASIN ON THE BELARUS TERRITORY.................................................................................................................................10 2.1 Brief characteristics of the upper Dnieper river basin ecoregion (territory of Belarus) ......10 2.2 Surface waters......................................................................................................................10 2.2.1 General description .......................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • MVC All-Nameso-S.Xls
    List of Communities, Regions or Country Name on the Memorial Israel Genealogical Society Town, Region or Alternative Additional Modern Hebrew Country Name Name Name Country Town Name אבל Obeliai Abel Lithuania אבל Obeliai Abel Lithuania אוברטין Obertyn Ukraine אוקוליצה Okolica Okolitsa Ukraine אוקוניב-מילוסנה Okuniew Okuniev Okuniew-Milosna Poland אוקונינקה Okuninka Poland אולנשט Olenesti Olenshat Ukraine אולבסק Olevsk Ukraine קורולובקה Oleyo-Korolevka Korolovka Ukraine אולקוש Olkusz Olkish Poland אולקוש Olkusz Poland אולימאן Ol'many Almany Belarus אלפיני Olpiny Poland אולשן Olshani Belarus אולשאן Olshany Olshan Belarus אולשנקה Olszanka Poland אוליק Olyka Olik Ukraine אוליקה Olyka Ukraine אולימלה Olymla Olypen Belarus אולפין Olypen Olpen Belarus אנישוק Onuskis (I) Anishok Ayskai Lithuania אנושישוק Onuskis (II) Anushishok Lithuania אפטא Opatow Kielci Apta Poland אופוצ'נה Opoczno Opochno Poland אופולה Opole Poland אופוליה לובלסקי Opole Lubelskie Opole Poland אופסה Opsa Belarus אורהיוב Orhei Orhaiv Moldava אושנציני Osieciny Osnetsini Poland אושיקוב Osjakow Oshyakov Poland אוסניצק Osnyck Osnik Ukraine אוסובא Osova Ukraine אוסובה Osowa Poland אוסטקי Ostki Ukraine אוסטראה Ostroh Ukraine אוסטראה Ostroh Ukraine אוסטרולנקה Ostrolenka Poland אוסטרופולה Ostropol Ostropola Ukraine אוסטריביה Ostrovye Ostrivia Ukraine אוסטרוב לובלסקי Ostrow Lubelski Ostrova Poland אוסטרובצה Ostrowiec Swietokrzyski Ostrovtse Poland אוסטרוב-משובייץ Ostrow-Mazowieca Ostrov Mazowiets Poland אוסטרוזץ Ostrozec Ostrozets Ukraine אוסטרוזץ Ostrozhets Ukraine אוסטרין Ostryna
    [Show full text]
  • Duleby Islands-Zaozerye Ramsar Information Sheet December 2012
    Ramsar Site: 2138 – Duleby Islands-Zaozerye Ramsar Information Sheet December 2012 Additional information Boundary description The boundaries coincide with those of Republican hydrological reserves "Duleby Islands" and "Zaozerie". The boundaries of the national hydrological reserve " Duleby Islands" are: In the North - from the northern corner of the quarter # 44 of the Kirov forest along the boundaries of quarters # 44, 45, 46, 47, 58, 71 of this forest, along the boundaries of quarters # 11, 1, 2, 3, 15, 16, 4, 5, 6 , 20, 21, 7, 8, 9, of the State Forestry Enterprise "Drut Military Forestry"; In the East and South - along the boundaries of quarters # 9, 24, 42, 60, 74, 87, 99, 98, 97, 111, 110, 109, 108, 120, 121, 133, 145, 157, 168, 177, 176 , 180, 179, 178, 172, 171, 170, 169 of the State Forestry Enterprise "Drut Military Forestry"; The West - on the borders of quarters # 169, 158, 146, 134, 122, 112 of the State Forestry Enterprise "Drut Military Forestry", quarters, # 37, 26, 18, 12 Kolbchany forest, quarters # 83, 79, 72, 73, 66, 54,44 of the Kirov forest to the northern corner quarter # 44 of this forestry. The boundaries of the national hydrological reserve "Zaozerye" are: In the North - from the intersection of the southern boundary of the M4 highway Minsk-Mogilev on the northern boundary of the quarter # 40 of Osovets forestry of the State Forestry Enterprise "Belynichi Forestry", then in an easterly direction along the northern boundary of quarters # 40, 41 along said road to the intersection of the north border of quarter
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Battles and Campaigns in 13Th–19Th Centuries
    POLISH BATTLES AND CAMPAIGNS IN 13TH–19TH CENTURIES WOJSKOWE CENTRUM EDUKACJI OBYWATELSKIEJ IM. PŁK. DYPL. MARIANA PORWITA 2016 POLISH BATTLES AND CAMPAIGNS IN 13TH–19TH CENTURIES WOJSKOWE CENTRUM EDUKACJI OBYWATELSKIEJ IM. PŁK. DYPL. MARIANA PORWITA 2016 Scientific editors: Ph. D. Grzegorz Jasiński, Prof. Wojciech Włodarkiewicz Reviewers: Ph. D. hab. Marek Dutkiewicz, Ph. D. hab. Halina Łach Scientific Council: Prof. Piotr Matusak – chairman Prof. Tadeusz Panecki – vice-chairman Prof. Adam Dobroński Ph. D. Janusz Gmitruk Prof. Danuta Kisielewicz Prof. Antoni Komorowski Col. Prof. Dariusz S. Kozerawski Prof. Mirosław Nagielski Prof. Zbigniew Pilarczyk Ph. D. hab. Dariusz Radziwiłłowicz Prof. Waldemar Rezmer Ph. D. hab. Aleksandra Skrabacz Prof. Wojciech Włodarkiewicz Prof. Lech Wyszczelski Sketch maps: Jan Rutkowski Design and layout: Janusz Świnarski Front cover: Battle against Theutonic Knights, XVI century drawing from Marcin Bielski’s Kronika Polski Translation: Summalinguæ © Copyright by Wojskowe Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej im. płk. dypl. Mariana Porwita, 2016 © Copyright by Stowarzyszenie Historyków Wojskowości, 2016 ISBN 978-83-65409-12-6 Publisher: Wojskowe Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej im. płk. dypl. Mariana Porwita Stowarzyszenie Historyków Wojskowości Contents 7 Introduction Karol Olejnik 9 The Mongol Invasion of Poland in 1241 and the battle of Legnica Karol Olejnik 17 ‘The Great War’ of 1409–1410 and the Battle of Grunwald Zbigniew Grabowski 29 The Battle of Ukmergė, the 1st of September 1435 Marek Plewczyński 41 The
    [Show full text]
  • Belarus OP7 CPS Approved
    SGP COUNTRY PROGRAMME STRATEGY FOR OP7 REPUBLIC OF BELARUS 1 Table of Content 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 3 2. BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 SUMMARY: Key Results/Accomplishments ............................................................................................ 3 3. COUNTRY PRIORITIES AND STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT ................................................................................... 5 3.1 Alignment with National Priorities ......................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Gaps and Opportunities ......................................................................................................................... 6 3.3 OP7 Strategic Priorities of the SGP Country Programme ....................................................................... 8 4. OP7 PRIORITY LANDSCAPES/SEASCAPES & STRATEGIC INITIATIVES ......................................................... 15 4.1 Grantmaking Within the Priority Landscape/Seascapes ...................................................................... 15 a) Process for selecting priority landscapes and seascapes. Selected Landscapes/Seascapes for OP7 15 b) OP7 Strategic Initiatives in the landscapes/seascapes .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annualreport2018 Compressed.Pdf
    Index Introduction 3 1 Hydrological conditions of EFAS gauging stations 4 Introduction 4 Assessing stations and data for analysis 4 Hydrological conditions in 2018 5 Comparative analysis 5 Variation of hydrological conditions 6 2 Gaps Analysis on the CEMS hydrological data base 8 Initial considerations 8 Gap analysis 8 Gap classifi cation by duration 8 Gap classifi cation by status 9 Other aspects to be considered 9 Gap typology and proposal for future data collection strategy 10 Outliers analysis 10 3 Analysis of Exceedance events 12 General description 12 Duration of Exceedances 12 Highest threshold level exceedances 14 4 Case study on the 2018 drought in Central Europe 15 Introduction and study area 15 Methodology 16 Results 16 5 Conclusions 21 Annex 1: Data provider list 22 Introduction This report contains an analysis of their dedication to the EFAS project, their role in responding to the questions and the hydrological data received by the commitment and the sharing of their solving issues. Without their collaboration Copernicus Emergency Management hydrological data. We thank them for their the delivery of this report would not be Service (CEMS) Hydrological Data cooperation with the HDCC, both in the possible. Collection Centre (HDCC) for the year provision of data and for their proactive 2018. The HDCC is contracted by the European Commission and operated by the Agencia de Medio Ambiente y Agua de Andalucía in collaboration with Soologic Technological Solutions S.L. By the end of 2018, 41 data providers contribute hydrological data to the CEMS hydrological data collection (see Figure 1). Three of them joined the partner network of the European Floods Awareness System (EFAS) during 2018: the Hydrometeorological Institute of Kosovo Environmental Protection Agency, the Hellenic National Meteorological Service from Greece and the Hydromet Center from Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • A Viking-Age Settlement in the Hinterland of Hedeby Tobias Schade
    L. Holmquist, S. Kalmring & C. Hedenstierna-Jonson (eds.), New Aspects on Viking-age Urbanism, c. 750-1100 AD. Proceedings of the International Symposium at the Swedish History Museum, April 17-20th 2013. Theses and Papers in Archaeology B THESES AND PAPERS IN ARCHAEOLOGY B New Aspects on Viking-age Urbanism, c. 750-1100 AD. Proceedings of the International Symposium at the Swedish History Museum, April 17–20th 2013 Lena Holmquist, Sven Kalmring & Charlotte Hedenstierna-Jonson (eds.) Contents Introduction Sigtuna: royal site and Christian town and the Lena Holmquist, Sven Kalmring & regional perspective, c. 980-1100 Charlotte Hedenstierna-Jonson.....................................4 Sten Tesch................................................................107 Sigtuna and excavations at the Urmakaren Early northern towns as special economic and Trädgårdsmästaren sites zones Jonas Ros.................................................................133 Sven Kalmring............................................................7 No Kingdom without a town. Anund Olofs- Spaces and places of the urban settlement of son’s policy for national independence and its Birka materiality Charlotte Hedenstierna-Jonson...................................16 Rune Edberg............................................................145 Birka’s defence works and harbour - linking The Schleswig waterfront - a place of major one recently ended and one newly begun significance for the emergence of the town? research project Felix Rösch..........................................................153
    [Show full text]
  • ANNEX J Exposures and Effects of the Chernobyl Accident
    ANNEX J Exposures and effects of the Chernobyl accident CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION.................................................. 453 I. PHYSICALCONSEQUENCESOFTHEACCIDENT................... 454 A. THEACCIDENT........................................... 454 B. RELEASEOFRADIONUCLIDES ............................. 456 1. Estimation of radionuclide amounts released .................. 456 2. Physical and chemical properties of the radioactivematerialsreleased ............................. 457 C. GROUNDCONTAMINATION................................ 458 1. AreasoftheformerSovietUnion........................... 458 2. Remainderofnorthernandsouthernhemisphere............... 465 D. ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOUR OF DEPOSITEDRADIONUCLIDES .............................. 465 1. Terrestrialenvironment.................................. 465 2. Aquaticenvironment.................................... 466 E. SUMMARY............................................... 466 II. RADIATIONDOSESTOEXPOSEDPOPULATIONGROUPS ........... 467 A. WORKERS INVOLVED IN THE ACCIDENT .................... 468 1. Emergencyworkers..................................... 468 2. Recoveryoperationworkers............................... 469 B. EVACUATEDPERSONS.................................... 472 1. Dosesfromexternalexposure ............................. 473 2. Dosesfrominternalexposure.............................. 474 3. Residualandavertedcollectivedoses........................ 474 C. INHABITANTS OF CONTAMINATED AREAS OFTHEFORMERSOVIETUNION............................ 475 1. Dosesfromexternalexposure
    [Show full text]
  • Geothermal Field and Geothermal Resources, Country Update for Belarus
    European Geothermal Congress 2019 Den Haag, The Netherlands, 11-14 June 2019 Geothermal Field and Geothermal Resources, Country Update for Belarus Margarita Dubanevich1, Vladimir Zui2 1 Republican Unitary Enterprise “Research and Production Centre for Geology”, Kuprevich str, 7, 220141 Minsk, Republic of Belarus; 2 Belarusian State University, Nezavisimosti sq., 4, 220030 Minsk, Republic of Belarus [email protected] , [email protected] Keywords: Geothermics, geothermal energy, here. The maximal temperature recorded in the deepest terrestrial temperature distribution, heat flow, inclined Predrechitsa-1 borehole at the base of the geothermal resources, GSHP installations, country platform cover was around 135-140 ºC at the depth of update. 6.4 km in the Pripyat Trough. First heat pump installations were created in the middle of nineties of the past century and for the end of 2018, ABSTRACT around 250 geothermal installations were put into The geothermal investigations were started in Belarus operation in the country and a few similar geothermal since 50th of the previous century. The region belongs heating systems are under construction each year. All to the western part of the East European Platform. Its available installations are used for space heating and territory formed mostly by Precambrian crustal blocks simultaneously to produce warm water. The biggest with Paleozoic Pripyat Trough and the Podlaska-Brest geothermal installation of 1 MWth was put into Depression in southern part of the country. There are no operation at the Greenhouse Complex “Berestye” at the warm springs within the considered area. eastern suburb of Brest town in the west part of the country. All heat pump installations excluding the latter Since the time elapsed after the World Geothermal one use shallow depth intervals with low-enthalpy Congress 2016 the main efforts were directed to geothermal resources.
    [Show full text]