The Impact of Bailout on Financial Performance and Bank Risk-Taking During Financial Crisis: a Critical Systematic Review / 7- 13

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Impact of Bailout on Financial Performance and Bank Risk-Taking During Financial Crisis: a Critical Systematic Review / 7- 13 Dety Nurfadilah / The Impact of Bailout on Financial Performance And Bank Risk-Taking During Financial Crisis: A Critical Systematic Review / 7- 13 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF e-ISSN: 2622-4585 | p-ISSN: 2580-0132 ipmi BUSINESS STUDIES Vol. 3 | No. 1 (February 2019) The Impact of Bailout on Financial Performance And Bank Risk-Taking During Financial Crisis: A Critical Systematic Review Dety Nurfadilah¹* ¹Faculty of Economics, Universitas Krisnadwipayana, Jakarta 13077, Indonesia A B S T R A C T A R T I C L E I N F O The focus on the bank bailout has been increased since the global Keywords: inancial crisis in 2008 in most countries. However, previous studies Bailout, often discover the relationship between bailout and corporate Financial Crisis, governance. In this study, bank bailout literature will be reviewed Systematic Review, with the focus on the impact of bailout on bank inancial Bank Risk-Taking, performance and bank risk-taking during the inancial crisis. Financial Performance Multi-step strategy is used to collect the data from 2000 to 2016. From the 7 papers were chosen based on the criteria. This systematic review has shown that the bank bailout has a positive impact on inancial performance, however, it has a negative impact on bank risk-taking for a longer period. *Corresponding Author E-mail: © 2019 IJBS, All rights reserved. [email protected] Copyright © 2019 Authors. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. INTRODUCTION The global inancial crisis in 2007-2009 has hit Currently, 465 failed banks in United States closed the real economy of the whole world. According by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to Dhameja (2010), this crisis is worse than the (FDIC) from the Initial crisis in 2008 to 2012, great depression crisis in the 1930s. This crisis is namely New Century, American Home Mortgage, spreading to the entire global inancial system. Netbank, Bear Stearns, Fannie Mae and Freddie Financial crisis triggers economic consequences Mac, Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brother, Washington of inlation, unemployment, drop in purchasing Mutual, American International Group, HSBC power and increases public doubt about its ability Finance Corporation, and so forth so on (Andrews to provide service. The global inancial crisis led et al, 2016; Karnitschnig et al, 2014; Ivashina & to a bank collapsed in the inancial sectors of Scharfstein, 2009). In Europe and Central Asia several important developed countries (Barth et region, the inancial crisis has caused the bank al., 2012). collapsed, namely Glitnir, Kaupthing and - 7 - International Journal of Business Studies Vol. 3 No. 1 ( February 2019) Landsbanki in Iceland; Bankia, CatalunyaCaixa, aid on bank crisis performance and its risk-taking. CajaSur in Spain; Parex Bank in Latvia; UBS in Switzerland; Fortis and BNP Paribas in Belgian To the best of author's knowledge, this is the irst and Luxembourg; Bank of Antigua in Eastern study to create a comprehensive systematic review Caribbean; Banco Privado Portugues in Portugal; on this issue. To date, the existing studies have Anglo Irish Bank in Ireland; BTA bank and Alliance examined the effect of bailout on bank future bank in Kazakhstan and so forth so on (White, behavior (Fisher et al., 2012; Dam and Koetter, 2008; Mclaughlin & Levring, 2008). In the Asia 2012; Gropp et al., 2011), impact of capital Paciic region, it caused the collapse of Lehman injections (Duchin and Sosyura, 2013; Berger et al. brothers in Japan and Bank West in Australia (2011); Mehran and Thakor (2011). A critical (KyodoNews, 2008; Kramer & Andrews, 2009). review of the literature was conducted to address According to Terazi and Şenel (2011), an the following question: what is the impact of unprecedentedly large number of failed banks has bailout on bank performance during the inancial increased the government attention to enacted crisis? And what is the impact of bailout on bank a range of rescue plans to help banks restore its risk-taking during the inancial crisis? health and conidence, as well as increase its inancial stability. In 2007, The US Federal Reserve This study is organized as follows: section 1 present offered a loan to several banks and made more the background of the study, section 2 describe funding available around $20bn, then European research methodology, section 3 state the result, Central Bank offered $500bn to assist commercial section 4 discuss the result, section 5 describes the banks. In 2008, United States launched Troubled limitations, and section 6 concludes the study. Asset Relief Program (TARP) with the total fund given around $700bn (Guillén, 2009), while British RESEARCH METHOD Government launched a bank rescue package Design with approximately $850 billion. According to Systematic review and narrative are used in this the International Monetary Fund (2010), Latvia study to present a critical overview of the research in the Baltic States suffered from the crisis and topic and evaluate the quality of the previous urged to ask for inancial support. The government studies (Ressing et al., 2009). A systematic review support continues until this day. In 2016, Italy is one type of literature review that collect and government approve to give fund around €20bn summarize all studies based on criteria (Khan et to support Monte Dei Paschi di Siena (BBC, 2016). al., 2003). This systematic reviews aimed to systematically examine the scientiic literature However, previous researchers argue that bailout to understand the impact of bailout on bank is making the bank worse in many ways. It performance and bank risk-taking. increases the bank risk-taking, volatility, and default risk, and create a moral hazard problem Search Strategy (Duchin and Sosyura, 2014). Unfortunately, this To achieve the research objectives, multiple-step issue is often ignored by the government and other search strategy was adopted from the previous inancial aid bodies because they are focusing study in the ield of inancial institution on “too big to fail institution” mindset. Also, the cost (International Finance Corporation, 2013), nurse of the bailout is very expensive. Every decision services (Carter and Chochinov, 2007; Jennings et made by the government will have consequences al., 2015), and construction management (Hong et on bank performance. Gerhardt and Vennet al, 2012; Yi and Wang, 2013; Osei-Kyei and Chan, (2016) added that the massive bailout program 2015). The two-step review was used to get has increased the question about the effect on a high-quality paper. At the irst stage, the authors government intervention on future bank behavior. created a list of thematic ield group about the Therefore, there is an increasing need to bailout. At the second stage, this list was narrowed understand the impact of government inancial down to sub-theme focusing on the impact on bank - 8 - Dety Nurfadilah / The Impact of Bailout on Financial Performance And Bank Risk-Taking During Financial Crisis: A Critical Systematic Review / 7- 13 performance and bank risk-taking (ig.1). In this study, a range of academic research database is used to collect the data such as SSRN A comprehensive search was carried out under website, Emerald Insight, Science Direct, Proquest, the “abstract / title / keywords”. The search Springerlink, business EBSCOHOST, and google keywords include “bailout inancial crisis”, scholar. Science Direct and Emerald Insight have “government support inancial crisis”, “bailout been considered as a database that performed corporate governance”, “bank bailout”, “bank better than another database website (Falagas performance in inancial crisis”, “bailout bank risk”, et al, 2008; Ke et al., 2009; Yuan and Shen, 2011; “bank risk-taking bailout”. In addition, the search Osei-Kyei and Chan, 2015). was restricted to the ield of study “accounting and inance”, “business, management, and Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria accounting”, “economics, econometrics, and According to Meline (2006), the process of inance”, “social science”. The third step, keywords systematic review consists of predetermined were combined using AND and OR. The full search criteria which are included and excluded from code is listed as follows: the research. Chambers (2004) added that studies are excluded from the collection of ABS-TITLE-KEY (“bailout” OR “inancial crisis” OR literature if they meet the following criteria: (1) “bank performance” OR government support” OR deinitely meet one or more of exclusion criteria, “bank bailout” OR impact bailout) AND ABS-TITLE- (2) contain ambiguous methods, (3) does not KEY (bank crisis performance” OR “bank risk- contain suficient data or statistics, or (4) does taking” OR “effect bailout”) AND SUBJAREA (busi not meet the predetermined criteria for quality. OR manag OR Acc OR econ OR soci) AND To achieve the goal of this research, several PUBYEAR N 2000 AND PUBYEAR b 2017 AND inclusion and exclusion criteria are as follows: LANGUAGE (“English”) AND SRCTYPE (j). Table 1. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria Abstract Select website Hand-search Inclusion Criteria: identiied and and links retrieved screened explored documents (I) Published articles relevant to the impact of bank bailout 568 65 17 on bank-risk taking and inancial performance during inancial crisis. (ii) Articles published from 2006 to 2017. (iii) The article types are journals, books, literature review, Irrelevant Documents conceptual study, empirical study. articles or with Irrelevant judged unrelated scope sites appropriate (iv) Articles are written in English. 328 39 6 (v) Exploring impact of bailout on bank performance and bank risk-taking. (vi) All countries which suffered from inancial crisis. Studies not Website and (vii) Literature focusing on any types of bailout: government, meeting links all inancial authority, IMF, and etc. inclusion criteria selection criteria 17 12 Inclusion Criteria: (I) Papers in non-English language and without English translation. Articles (ii) Magazine, newspaper, or blog which are not based on included in Documents included theoretical or empirical study.
Recommended publications
  • From the American Dream to … Bailout America: How the Government
    From the American dream to … bailout America: How the government loosened credit standards and led to the mortgage meltdown Compiled by Edward Pinto, American Enterprise Institute In the early 1990s, Fannie Mae‘s CEO Jim Johnson developed a plan to protect Fannie‘s lucrative charter privileges bestowed by Congress. Ply Congress with copious amounts of affordable housing and Fannie‘s privileges would be secure. It required ―transforming the housing finance system‖ by drastically loosening of loan underwriting standards. Fannie garnered support from community advocacy groups like ACORN and members of Congress. In 1995 President Clinton formalized Fannie‘s plan into the National Homeownership Strategy. President Clinton stated it ―will not cost the taxpayers one extra cent.‖ From 1992 onward, ―skin in the game‖ was progressively eliminated from housing finance. And it worked – Fannie‘s supporters in and outside Congress successfully protected Fannie‘s (and Freddie‘s) charter privileges against all comers – until the American Dream became Bailout America. TIMELINE Credit loosening Warning 1991 HUD Commission complains ―Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac‘s underwriting standards are oriented towards ‗plain vanilla‘ mortgage‖ [Read More] 1991 Lenders will respond to the most conservative standards unless [Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac] are aggressive and convincing in their efforts to expand historically narrow underwriting [Read More] 1992 Countrywide and Fannie Mae join forces to originate ―flexibly underwritten loans‖ [Read More] 1992 Congress passes
    [Show full text]
  • Housing Finance Reform: Addressing a Growing Divide
    08 Housing finance reform: Addressing a growing divide Barclays examines how United States housing finance policies affect homeownership rates, finding that affordability targets can provide an effective counterbalance to rising income inequality. 2 Foreword More than a decade after the mortgage-focused government- sponsored enterprises (GSEs) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were placed under conservatorship during the 2008 Financial Crisis, the debate about the appropriate role of the government in the housing market continues. 13 October 2020 Despite a raft of housing policies including subsidies, taxes We draw several lessons from these results. First, the and mortgage guarantees, the US has similar homeownership government can positively influence housing outcomes. levels to other developed countries that do not offer such Second, the distinct effect of the GSE affordability targets support. Critics of the current policies cite this as evidence suggests that other forms of support, such as the FHA, may that government intervention accomplishes little except create not be sufficient for low income and minority borrowers in distortions in the housing market, and argue for a sharply their current form. reduced role for government going forward. From a housing policy perspective, this does not translate Yet an important structural difference between the US and into support for the status quo. Many interventions in the other developed economies is the high, and rising, level housing market should be reviewed and may be unnecessary, of income inequality in the US. Our analysis indicates that and we cannot ignore the lessons from the financial crisis rising inequality exerts significant downwards pressure and resulting bailouts.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Crisis of 2008 and the Philippine Policy Responses Global Financial Crisis
    Financial Crisis of 2008 and the Philippine Policy Responses Global Financial Crisis March 2008- Bear SfStearns fails July 2008 - Wall Street plunges FDIC bails out large US banks (IndyMac, Washington Mutual, Wachovia) Global Financial Crisis Sept 2008 - Lehman Brothers fails US government bails out Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and AIG Global Financial Crisis Oct 2008 - Bailout of UK banks (Royal Bank of Scotland, HBOS and Lloyds TSB) Nov to Dec 2008 - Germany, Denmark, Ireland, Sweden,Italy, Britain, Eurozone, Japan, Hongkong and the US in recession Policy Responses to Global Crisis 1. Central Bank (Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Reclassification of Financial Assets from Held for Trading or Available for Sale to the Held-to- Maturity (HTM) or Liquidated Debt Securities classified as Loans categories. - Effective July 1. PliPolicy R esponses t o Gl GlblCiiobal Crisis Price of ROPs* from June ’08 to June ‘09 * Republic of the Philippines PliPolicy R esponses t o Gl GlblCiiobal Crisis Price of ROPs* from June ’08 to June ‘09 * Republic of the Philippines Policy Responses to Global Crisis • Amendment of PDIC Charter Oct 2008 - Bills filed in House of representatives to Dec 2008 and Senate to increase the Maximum Deposit Insurance Coverage (MDIC) Policy Responses to Global Crisis March 4, 2009 - Congress approved joint version of PDIC Charter amendments April 29, 2009 - Signed into law by the President of the Philippines June 1, 2009 - Charter Amendments took effect Policy Responses to Global Crisis Amendments to the PDIC Charter . Increase in the Maximum Deposit Insurance Coverage (MDIC) from P250,000 to P500,000 . Institutional Strengthening Measures 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharp -V- Blank (HBOS) Judgment
    Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWHC 3078 (Ch) Case Nos: HC-2014-000292 HC-2014-001010 HC-2014-001387 HC-2014-001388 HC-2014-001389 HC-2015-000103 HC-2015-000105 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CHANCERY DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 15/11/2019 Before: SIR ALASTAIR NORRIS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between: JOHN MICHAEL SHARP Claimants And the other Claimants listed in the GLO Register - and - (1) SIR MAURICE VICTOR BLANK Defendant (2) JOHN ERIC DANIELS (3) TIMOTHY TOOKEY (4) HELEN WEIR (5) GEORGE TRUETT TATE (6) LLOYDS BANKING GROUP PLC - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Richard Hill QC, Sebastian Isaac, Jack Rivett and Lara Hassell-Hart (instructed by Harcus Sinclair UK Limited) for the Claimants Helen Davies QC, Tony Singla and Kyle Lawson (instructed by Herbert Smith Freehills LLP) for the Defendants Hearing dates: 17-20, 23-27, 30-31 October 2017; 1-2, 6-9, 13-17,20, 22-23, 27, 29-30 November 2017, 1, 11-15, 18-21 December 2017, 12, 16-19, 22-26, 29-31 January 2018, 1-2, 5- 6, 8, 28 February 2018, 1-2 and 5 March 2018 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Approved Judgment I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic. ............................. INDEX: The task in hand 1 The landscape in broad strokes 8 The claim in outline. 29 The legal basis for the claim 41 The factual witnesses. 43 The expert witnesses 59 The facts: the emerging financial
    [Show full text]
  • KPMG's European Central Bank Quarterly Update
    KPMG’s European Central Bank Quarterly Update September 2016 Welcome back from Summer holidays. With rest and SREP 2016 vs. SREP 2015 – how will they relaxation behind us now, KPMG's ECB Office looks forward to refocusing on the SSM priorities and key compare? regulatory issues facing banks across the Eurozone. Hot 4 November will mark the second anniversary of the off the press, the ECB has published its Draft Guidance to European Central Bank (ECB) as banking supervisor. This Banks on Non-Performing Loans. One interesting point is second year of supervision will end with a communication that all banks (even those with low NPLs) will be expected to the significant banks regarding the capital decision on to apply several chapters of the guidance, so it will have a the SSM common Supervisory Review and Evaluation widespread impact. The ECB will invite comment on the Process (SREP) methodology for the ongoing assessment Guidance in the coming months before the guidance goes of credit institutions’ risks, governance arrangements and into effect. KPMG’s ECB Office will soon publish an alert capital and liquidity situation, which have been carefully on this and the combined impact of this Guidance and the tailored to the Eurozone banks’ situations. The question on EBA report on NPLs. the mind of many in the banking sector is, “Is SREP 2016 going to be comparable to SREP 2015?” At the end of July the European Banking Authority released the results of the Stress Test 2016, which have revealed that the banking sector is more resilient than in 2014, but this is offset by high credit risk, poor profitability and other factors.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Years of FROB 2009-2019. a Decade for Financial Stability
    10 YEARS OF FROB 2009 - 2019 A DECADE FOR FINANCIAL STABILITY 10 YEARS OF FROB 2009 - 2019 A DECADE FOR FINANCIAL STABILITY Reproduction for educational or non-profit purposes is permitted provided the source is cited. FROB, Madrid, 2019. 10 YEARS OF FROB 2009-2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR ................................................................................................................................. 11 SECTION I: DEVELOPMENT OF THE ROLE OF FROB IN THE BANKING CRISIS ..................................................... 13 CHAPTER I (2009-2011) THE ORIGINS OF THE CRISIS, FROB AND THE NEW BANK RESOLUTION REGIME ....................................................... 14 Period 2009-2010. FROB I. Supporting the integration of savings banks .................................................................... 14 National and international context ............................................................................................................................... 14 Legal and institutional framework ................................................................................................................................. 20 The model for orderly bank restructuring and the creation of FROB ................................................................... 20 Restructuring processes ................................................................................................................................................... 20 Integration processes .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fixed Income
    FX Market Headlines EUR rallies as bailout agreed Greece finally secures second bailout JPY weakens on inflation target BoE minutes indicate that more QE could be on the way EURCHF closes in on 1.20 floor Important Disclosure This document is based on information provided by Citigroup Investment Research, Citigroup Global Markets, Citigroup Global Citi analystsalth Management and Citigroup Alternative Investments. It is provided for your information only. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. Information in this document has been prepared without taking account of the objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular investor. Accordingly, investors should, before acting on the information, consider its appropriateness, having regard to their objectives, financial situation and needs. Any decision to purchase securities mentioned herein should be made based on a review of your particular circumstances with your financial adviser. Investments referred to in this document are not recommendations of Citibank or its affiliates. Although information has been obtained from and is based upon sources that Citibank believes tobe reliable, we do not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete and condensed. All opinions, projections and estimates constitute the judgment of the author as of the date of publication and are subject to ch ange without notice. Prices and availability of financial instruments also are subject to change without notice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The document is not to be construed as a solicitation or recommendation of investment advice. Subject to the nature and contents of the document, the investments described herein are subject to fluctuations in price and/or value and investors may get back less than originally invested.
    [Show full text]
  • Helping People Achieve Their Ambitions – in the Right Way
    Helping people achieve their ambitions – in the right way Barclays PLC Annual Report 2014 What is this report? The 2014 Annual Report includes a Strategic Report that summarises the key elements of the full report. The Strategic Report is in line with the regulations and best practice as advised by the Financial Reporting Council, and the Department of Business, Innovation & Skills. The design changes this year with increased infographics are intended to facilitate more effective communication with all our stakeholders, and to provide more concise and relevant narrative reports. These objectives are entirely in line with our aim to become more clear and transparent on our journey to be the ‘Go-To’ bank. We will continue to engage with stakeholders to identify ways in which we can further advance this agenda. Notes The term Barclays or Group refers to Barclays PLC together with its subsidiaries. Unless otherwise stated, the income statement analysis compares the year ended 31 December 2014 to the corresponding twelve months of 2013 and balance sheet analysis as at 31 December 2014 with comparatives relating to 31 December 2013. The abbreviations ‘£m’ and ‘£bn’ represent millions and thousands of millions of Pounds Sterling respectively; and the abbreviations ‘$m’ and ‘$bn’ represent millions and thousands of millions of US Dollars respectively. The strategic report The comparatives have been restated to reflect the implementation of the Group structure changes and the reallocation of elements of the Head An overview of our 2014 performance, a focus on our strategic direction, Office results under the revised business structure. These restatements were detailed in our announcement on 10 July 2014, accessible at barclays.com/ and a review of the businesses underpinning our strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Fondos De Inversión ANEXO A1.1 Sep-11
    Fondos de inversión ANEXO A1.1 sep-11 Fondo Clase Código ISIN Sociedad Gestora Entidad Depostiaria Grupo Financiero 30-70 EURO INVERSION, FI - ES0184833038 BARCLAYS WEALTH MANAGERS ESPAÑA, S.G.I.I.C., S.A.BARCLAYS BANK, S.A. BARCLAYS BANK A&G TESORERIA, FI - ES0156873004 A&G FONDOS, SGIIC, SA SANTANDER INVESTMENT, S.A. BANCO SANTANDER, S.A. A.S.C. GLOBAL, FI - ES0114223037 BBVA ASSET MANAGEMENT, S.A., SGIIC BANCO DEPOSITARIO BBVA, S.A. BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA, S.A. ABANDO EQUITIES, FI - ES0109656001 DUX INVERSORES, SGIIC, S.A. BANKINTER, S.A. BANKINTER ABANTE ASESORES GLOBAL, FI - ES0109652034 ABANTE ASESORES GESTION, SGIIC, S.A. BANKINTER, S.A. BANKINTER ABANTE BOLSA ABSOLUTA, FI CLASE A ES0109655037 ABANTE ASESORES GESTION, SGIIC, S.A. BANKINTER, S.A. BANKINTER CLASE I ES0109655003 ABANTE ASESORES GESTION, SGIIC, S.A. BANKINTER, S.A. BANKINTER ABANTE BOLSA, FI - ES0105011037 ABANTE ASESORES GESTION, SGIIC, S.A. BANKINTER, S.A. BANKINTER ABANTE PATRIMONIO GLOBAL, FI CLASE A ES0105013033 ABANTE ASESORES GESTION, SGIIC, S.A. BANKINTER, S.A. BANKINTER CLASE I ES0105013009 ABANTE ASESORES GESTION, SGIIC, S.A. BANKINTER, S.A. BANKINTER ABANTE RENTA, FI - ES0162947032 ABANTE ASESORES GESTION, SGIIC, S.A. BANKINTER, S.A. BANKINTER ABANTE RENTABILIDAD ABSOLUTA, FI CLASE A ES0184837039 ABANTE ASESORES GESTION, SGIIC, S.A. BANKINTER, S.A. BANKINTER CLASE I ES0184837005 ABANTE ASESORES GESTION, SGIIC, S.A. BANKINTER, S.A. BANKINTER ABANTE SELECCION, FI - ES0162946034 ABANTE ASESORES GESTION, SGIIC, S.A. BANKINTER, S.A. BANKINTER ABANTE TESORERIA, FI - ES0190051039 ABANTE ASESORES GESTION, SGIIC, S.A. BANKINTER, S.A. BANKINTER ABANTE VALOR, FI - ES0190052037 ABANTE ASESORES GESTION, SGIIC, S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Did Repeal of Glass-Steagall for Citigroup Exacerbate the Crisis?
    ETHICS Curtis C. Verschoor, CMA, Editor Did Repeal of Glass-Steagall for Citigroup Exacerbate Freed from the restrictions of the Glass-Steagall Act, giant bank- the Crisis? holding companies appear to have been focused more on industry should be recognized as Citibank and Travelers Group. In meeting the expectations of Wall at least a quasi-public utility, exist- addition to the traditional bank- Street analysts than on protect- ing in large part for the benefit of ing services, this $140 billion ing depositors’ funds from risk. depositors who need to have con- umbrella encompassed brokerage, tinuing confidence that their investment banking, and several funds are safe. insurance companies, including mid the finger-pointing After the savings and loan disas- Travelers. Agoing on in regard to the cur- ter caused the previous banking More recently, urged on by for- rent banking crisis, it seems that debacle, the FDIC Improvement mer U.S. Treasury Secretary we may be forgetting who the real Act of 1991 mandated that insured Robert Rubin, Citigroup’s director culprits are. Should we blame the institutions employ adequate con- and chair of its Executive Com- bungling bureaucrats in Fannie trols to manage their risks in order mittee, Citi acquired heavy expo- Mae, Freddie Mac, the Federal to maintain the safety and sound- sure to Collateralized Debt Oblig- Reserve, the Securities & Exchange ations (CDOs) based on subprime Commission (SEC), and the Trea- mortgages. By 2006, Citi had sury Department? Or are the regu- It will take a major become the second largest under- lators (perhaps they should be overhaul of business writer of CDOs.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Industry Leaders Report 2021: Route to Recovery
    The Aviation Industry Leaders Report 2021: Route to Recovery www.aviationnews-online.com www.kpmg.ie/aviation KPMG REPORT COVERS 2021.indd 1 20/01/2021 14:19 For what’s next in Aviation. Navigating Change. Together. Your Partner For What’s Next KPMG6840_Aviation_Industry_Leaders_Report REPORT COVERS 2021.indd 2021 2 Ads x 4_Jan_2021.indd 4 19/01/202120/01/2021 15:37:29 14:19 CONTENTS 2 List of 10 Regional Review 24 Airline Survivorship 36 Return of the MAX 54 Chapter Four: The Contributors and Post-Covid World Acknowledgements Chapter One Assessing which Boeing’s 737 MAX incorporates a regional airlines will survive the aircraft was cleared for The recovery from 4 Foreword from Joe review of the aviation immediate health crisis return to service after the devastation the O’Mara, Head of market. and the subsequent the US Federal Aviation coronavirus pandemic Aviation, KPMG recovery period has Administration officially has wrought on the 18 Government rescinded the grounding world is expected to be Ireland become an essential Lifelines skill for lessors, lenders order. Industry experts slow but how will the 6 Chapter One: and suppliers. discuss the prospects new world environment This section takes a for the aircraft type and impact demand for air Surviving the Crisis deep dive into the levels 28 Chapter Two: Fleet how it will be financed. travel. This chapter also of government support considers the impact This chapter considers Focus for the aviation industry 44 Chapter Three: The of climate change the macroeconomic and around the world and Airlines are likely to Credit Challenge concerns on the aviation geopolitical shock of the considers its impact emerge from the crisis coronavirus pandemic industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Outlook for the Spanish Banking Sector in 2013 and Beyond: Completing the Mou and Addressing Remaining Challenges
    Outlook for the Spanish banking sector in 2013 and beyond: Completing the MoU and addressing remaining challenges Santiago Carbó Valverde1 and Francisco Rodríguez Fernández2 Many requirements set by the July 2012 Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) for financial assistance to Spanish banks have already been carried out last year. Several important outstanding measures are expected by the end of June 2013, but challenges will remain over the next few years. Restoring financial stability, credit growth and reducing the cost for taxpayers will be the main factors in determining the success of the restructuring and recapitalization process in 2013 Vol. 2, N.º 1 (January 2013) Vol. and beyond. 20 The implementation of the MoU requirements has shown significant progress since November 2012. Key steps such as the approval of the restructuring/resolution plans, the injection of the necessary capital for banks and the effective transfer of impaired assets from the banks to the asset management company Sareb, have been carried out. Importantly, these events have coincided with a relatively calmer situation in sovereign and private debt markets that has brought some stability to financial institutions. This can been seen in the increase in deposit inflows in November 2012, after observing a continuous outflow since March 2012. However, loans continued decreasing. Adoption of important pending measures, such as initiation of activities of the asset management company Sareb and the completion of new bank restructuring plans, should also be addressed in 2013. The completion of the efficiency plans of the banks in 2013 may help create a better environment for lending, but the growth of bank financing will ultimately depend upon the improvement of macroeconomic conditions.
    [Show full text]