DOCSLIB.ORG

31295005858971.Pdf (1.742Mb)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
31295005858971.Pdf (1.742Mb) i- DISTURBANCE OF ANT COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN CENTRAL TEXAS BY THE RED IMPORTED FIRE ANT, SOLENOPSIS INVICTA by GERARDO RAFAEL CAMILO, B.S. A THESIS IN ENTOMOLOGY Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved August, 1990 ^r^a ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS No C^) (* ^l express my deepest gratitude to Dr. Sherman A. Phillips, Jr., for giving me the opportunity to work under his direction. I am thankful also to Dr. Harlan G. Thorvilson and Dr. Michael R. Willig for serving on my thesis committee. Thanks are expressed to Drs. George C. and Jeanette N. Wheeler, Dr. James C. Trager, and Mr. James C. Cokendolpher for the identification of specimens. Thanks are also extended to Kathy Phillips and the graduate students of the Departments of Agronomy, Horticulture, and Entomology, and Biological Sciences, who provided help with the field work and helpful comments about my research. Many people helped me to reach this point. Dr. Bob Waide and Dr. Willig provided encouragement to continue graduate studies. Dr. Rip Phillips always knew when to pull the breaks on me, and other graduate students provided helpful comments on my research. I am deeply thankful to all of you. Finally, I want to thank my family, especially my mother, Josefina Rivera, for being so understanding, loving, and patient with me. They provided the extra encouragement needed. Thanks. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii ABSTRACT iv LIST OF TABLES v LIST OF FIGURES vi CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION 1 Community and Competition 1 Dominance and Diversity 2 Ant Communities 3 Competitive Replacement by the Red Imported Fire Ant 5 Statement of Study Objectives 8 II. MATERIALS AND METHODS 9 Study Area 9 Sampling Techniques 9 Cluster Analysis 11 Principal Components Analysis 11 m. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 13 IV. CONCLUSIONS 25 LITERATURE CITED 2 8 111 ABSTRACT The introduction of a competitor into an established community provides an excellent opportunity to study the factors that maintain the dominance, diversity, and interactions of that community. The introduction of the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren, into North America provides such an opportunity. A transect, with pitfall traps as sampling units, was established in central Texas, U.S.A., from areas uninfested to heavily infested by S.. invicta. Cluster analysis of the species composition at particular localities depicts four distinct ant assemblages, two without and two with S.. invicta. A fifth aggregation of species was found and consisted almost entirely of S.. invicta. Principal components analysis reveals that disturbance of the habitat, mostly by humans, is the main factor controlling ant diversity. More specifically, increasing densities of the red imported fire ant were negatively correlated with species diversity. Conomyrma insana (McCook) can coexist with S.. invicta. probably because direct competitors or predators have been eliminated by S.. invicta. Ants of the granivorous guild, mostly Pheidole spp., that occur with the red imported fire ant are being displaced, whereas more generalistic ants, like Monomorium minimum (Buckley) and Forelius pruinosus (Roger), coexist with S.. invicta. IV LIST OF TABLES 1. Species assemblages in central Texas, U.S.A., as detected by cluster analysis 17 2. Principal components analysis scores of plots, percent of variation accounted for by each component (R^), and cumulative variation (IR2). 21 3. Correlation of species importance values to densities of Solenopsis invicta 24 LIST OF FIGURES 1. Systematic affiliation and sample sizes of ant species collected from August 1986 to October 1987 14 2. Dendrogram of ant species assemblages located in Kerr and Kimble Counties, Texas, U. S. A. Plots K and L were excluded from the analysis. 16 3. Principal components analysis of plots by species. Squares in the 1-2 axes plane are the geometrical projections of the plots in the ordination space. Axis 1 is correlated with disturbance, axis 2 with temperature, and axis 4 with density of S.. invicta. 20 VI CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Community and Competition The concept of community has generated a long series of arguments throughout the history of ecology. One school of thought is that the community is a "super-organism" in which the total is more than the sum of its parts (Clements 1916). Central to this theory is the view that the history of past interactions is the driving force that gives rise to the present communities (Odum 1971). The diversity of a community, that is, which species are present and in what numbers, is considered to be influenced mostly by competition. This community theory is based upon Cause's application of Malthusian population theory to interspecific ecological interactions (Hardin 1960). If two populations of different species, A and B, occupy the same niche and live in the same environment with limited resources, and A reproduces faster than B, then A will displace B, and B will become extinct (Miller 1967). This interpretation implies that interspecific competition in the past caused niche divergence, resulting in differences between species that are seen in contemporary communities (Schoener 1974). Yet other kinds of interactions, like predation and parasitism, were not considered as impo lant as competition in structuring communities (Seifert 1984). The other school of thought considers a community to be a group of species occupying a common area. The diversity of the community is a function of autecological rather than synecological processes (Strong et al. 1984). Such communities would not be holistic entities, but simply a collection of relatively autonomous populations occupying the same area at the same time. Community diversity is not affected just by competition but also by other biotic interactions and abiotic factors such as weather. Interactions like parasitism, predation and mutualism, can be the main factors responsible for the observed community structure (Strong 1984, Seifert 1984). The presumption that competition in the past is the general cause for species diversity and distribution in communities has been referred to as "the ghost of competition past" (Council 1980). Interspecific competition may not be common in communities because other natural factors (i.e., stochastic environmental fluctuations or parasites) frequently intervene to maintain densities below resource-defined equilibria (Strong 1984, Wiens 1977). Competition is more likely to affect species under moderately harsh environmental conditions, as opposed to either benign or extremely harsh environmental conditions (Council 1980). Under harsh conditions, such as droughts, populations of potential competitors may be reduced below the densities at which they would compete. Harshness, in this case, does not imply a reduction in resources. On the other hand, under benign conditions, predators, parasites, and pathogens may be more effective in maintaining population densities of prey or hosts below the level at which competition might occur. In addition, the intensity and duration of competition may not be enough as to be critical in the structuring of the community (Wiens 1977). Dominance and Diversity The dominance-diversity relationships in communities have long been of interest to ecologists (Brown & Gibson 1983, Ricklefs 1987). A dominant species in a community is one that largely controls energy flow and strongly affects the environment of other species (Odum 1971). Dominance of a species in a community may be expressed by high density, high frequency of occurrence, or appreciable influence on the densities and occurrence of other species (Werner 1984). The concept of diversity involves several other ecological concepts. Two of these concepts are species richness, or the number of species present in the community, and equitability, or the distribution of relative importance values among the species in the community (Peet 1974). The two terms. 3 dominance and diversity, are complements of each other. Dominance relationships are manifestations of the "sorting out" of species in the community, as dominance develops, diversity is established (Whittaker 1965). Ant Communities The high diversity and specialized behavior of ants make them important members of almost every terrestrial community (Carroll & Janzen 1973, Levings & Traniello 1981). Ants occupy all consumer trophic levels and exhibit all types of symbiotic relationships which have been demonstrated (Carroll & Janzen 1973). The structure of ant communities, as with any other community, depends on which ant species are present, in what numbers, and the type and intensity of the biotic interactions occurring at any given time (Levins et al. 1973, Heatwole & Levins 1972). However, the distribution and the number of species in a community are also a function of other factors. Species distributions have been found to be affected by climate, nutritional requirements, predators, and natural dispersal barriers (Culver 1974, Torres 1984a). Foraging ecology of ants, their highly aggressive behavior, and territoriality have a profound effect on the structure of ant communities. Levings and Traniello (1981) discussed the importance of spatial arrangement of ant nests and their territoriality in relation to the structure of ant communities. They found that ant species are regularly distributed with respect to conspecific and other sympatric species, and that these distributional phenomena are an outcome of high overlap of food utilization.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Influence of Small-Scale Disturbances by Kangaroo Rats on Chihuahuan Desert Ants
    Oecologia (2000) 125:142–149 © Springer-Verlag 2000 R.L. Schooley · B.T. Bestelmeyer · J.F. Kelly Influence of small-scale disturbances by kangaroo rats on Chihuahuan Desert ants Received: 11 October 1999 / Accepted: 11 March 2000 Abstract Banner-tailed kangaroo rats (Dipodomys Introduction spectabilis) are prominent ecosystem engineers that build large mounds that influence the spatial structuring Natural disturbances create environmental patchiness of fungi, plants, and some ground-dwelling animals. that can strongly influence organisms and ecological Ants are diverse and functionally important components processes (Watt 1947; Wiens 1976; Pickett and White of arid ecosystems; some species are also ecosystem en- 1985; Turner 1987). In particular, patch disturbances can gineers. We investigated the effects of patch disturbances affect patterns of species richness and community struc- created by D. spectabilis mounds on ant assemblages in ture by increasing habitat heterogeneity and permitting a Chihuahuan Desert grassland in southern New Mexico the coexistence of species with differing competitive and by using pitfall traps in a paired design (mound vs. ma- colonization abilities (Horn and MacArthur 1972; trix). Although the disturbances did not alter species Denslow 1985; Huston 1994). In terrestrial systems, the richness or harbor unique ant communities relative to the disturbances created by the activities of burrowing mam- matrix, they did alter species composition; the abun- mals are important generators of spatial heterogeneity dances of 6 of 26 species were affected. The distur- (Huntley and Inouye 1988; Whicker and Detling 1988; bances might also act to disrupt spatial patterning of ants Hansell 1993). These effects are especially evident in ar- caused by other environmental gradients.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Formicidae), and Generalized Ant and Arthropod Diversity
    COMMUNITY AND ECOSYSTEM ECOLOGY Positive Association Between Densities of the Red Imported Fire Ant, Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), and Generalized Ant and Arthropod Diversity LLOYD W. MORRISON AND SANFORD D. PORTER Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, USDAÐARS, P.O. Box 14565, Gainesville, FL 32604 Environ. Entomol. 32(3): 548Ð554 (2003) ABSTRACT The invasive ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren, is a threat to native arthropod biodiversity. We compared areas with naturally varying densities of mostly monogyne S. invicta and examined the association of S. invicta density with three diversity variables: (1) the species richness of ants, (2) the species richness of non-ant arthropods, and (3) the abundance of non-S. invicta ants. Pitfall traps were used to quantify S. invicta density and the three diversity variables; measurement of mound areas provided a complementary measure of S. invicta density. We sampled 45 sites of similar habitat in north central Florida in both the spring and autumn of 2000. We used partial correlations to elucidate the association between S. invicta density and the three diversity variables, extracting the effects of temperature and humidity on foraging activity. Surprisingly, we found moderate positive correlations between S. invicta density and species richness of both ants and non-ant arthropods. Weaker, but usually positive, correlations were found between S. invicta density and the abundance of non-S. invicta ants. A total of 37 ant species, representing 16 genera, were found to coexist with S. invicta over the 45 sites. These results suggest that S. invicta densities as well as the diversities of other ants and arthropods are regulated by common factors (e.g., productivity).
    [Show full text]
  • Synonymic List of Neotropical Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
    BIOTA COLOMBIANA Special Issue: List of Neotropical Ants Número monográfico: Lista de las hormigas neotropicales Fernando Fernández Sebastián Sendoya Volumen 5 - Número 1 (monográfico), Junio de 2004 Instituto de Ciencias Naturales Biota Colombiana 5 (1) 3 -105, 2004 Synonymic list of Neotropical ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Fernando Fernández1 and Sebastián Sendoya2 1Profesor Asociado, Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, AA 7495, Bogotá D.C, Colombia. [email protected] 2 Programa de Becas ABC, Sistema de Información en Biodiversidad y Proyecto Atlas de la Biodiversidad de Colombia, Instituto Alexander von Humboldt. [email protected] Key words: Formicidae, Ants, Taxa list, Neotropical Region, Synopsis Introduction Ant Phylogeny Ants are conspicuous and dominant all over the All ants belong to the family Formicidae, in the superfamily globe. Their diversity and abundance both peak in the tro- Vespoidea, within the order Hymenoptera. The most widely pical regions of the world and gradually decline towards accepted phylogentic schemes for the superfamily temperate latitudes. Nonetheless, certain species such as Vespoidea place the ants as a sister group to Vespidae + Formica can be locally abundant in some temperate Scoliidae (Brother & Carpenter 1993; Brothers 1999). countries. In the tropical and subtropical regions numerous Numerous studies have demonstrated the monophyletic species have been described, but many more remain to be nature of ants (Bolton 1994, 2003; Fernández 2003). Among discovered. Multiple studies have shown that ants represent the most widely accepted characters used to define ants as a high percentage of the biomass and individual count in a group are the presence of a metapleural gland in females canopy forests.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ants of South Carolina Timothy Davis Clemson University, [email protected]
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Dissertations Dissertations 5-2009 The Ants of South Carolina Timothy Davis Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Timothy, "The Ants of South Carolina" (2009). All Dissertations. 331. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/331 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ANTS OF SOUTH CAROLINA A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Entomology by Timothy S. Davis May 2009 Accepted by: Dr. Paul Mackey Horton, Committee Chair Dr. Craig Allen, Co-Committee Chair Dr. Eric Benson Dr. Clyde Gorsuch ABSTRACT The ants of South Carolina were surveyed in the literature, museum, and field collections using pitfall traps. M. R. Smith was the last to survey ants in South Carolina on a statewide basis and published his list in 1934. VanPelt and Gentry conducted a survey of ants at the Savanna River Plant in the 1970’s. This is the first update on the ants of South Carolina since that time. A preliminary list of ants known to occur in South Carolina has been compiled. Ants were recently sampled on a statewide basis using pitfall traps. Two hundred and forty-three (243) transects were placed in 15 different habitat types. A total of 2673 pitfalls traps were examined, 41,414 individual ants were identified.
    [Show full text]
  • FLORIDA ENTOMOLOGIST (An International Journal/Or the Americas) Volume 71, No.4 December, 1988
    (ISSN 0015-4040) FLORIDA ENTOMOLOGIST (An International Journal/or the Americas) Volume 71, No.4 December, 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS Announcement 72nd Annual Meeting . SYMPOSIUM ON AGROACOUSTICS Preface . ii AGEE, H. R.-How Do Acoustic Inputs to the Central NertJQU8 System of the Bollworm Moth Control Its Behavior? . 393 BURK, T.-Acoustic Signals, Arms Races and the Costs ofHonest Signaling . 400 CALKINS, C. 0., AND J. C. WEBB-Tempornl and Seasonal Differences in Move­ ment ofthe Caribbean Fruit Fly Larvae in Grapefruit and the Relationship to Detection by Acoustics .. 409 FORREST, T. G.-UsingInsect Smtnds to EstimateandMonitor TheirPopulations 416 HAACK, R. A., R. W. BLANK, F. T. FINK, AND W. J. MATI'SON-Ultrasonic Acoustical Emissions from Sapwood ofEastern White Pine, Nort1urrn Red Oak, RedMaple andPaperBirch: Implicationsfor Bark- andWood-Feeding Insects , .. 427 HAGSTRUM, D. W., J. C. WEBB, AND K. W. VICK-AcmtStical Detection and Estimation ofRhyzopertha dominica Larval Populations in Stored Wheat 441 RYKER, L, C.-Acoustic Studies ofDendroctonus Bark Beetles . 447 SIVINSKI, J.-What Do Fruit Fly Songs Mean? . 462 SPANGLER, H. G.-Sound and the Moths That Infest Beehives . 467 VICK, K. W., J. e. WEBB, D. W. HAGSTRUM, B. A. WEAVER, AND e. A. LITZKOW-A Serund-Insulated Room Suitable for U8e With an AcmtStic Insect DetectionSystemandDesign Parametersfora GrainSampleHolding Container . 478 WALKER, T. J.-AcmtStic Traps for Agriculturally Important Insects . 484 WEBB, J. C., D. C. SLAUGHTER, AND C. A. LITZKOW-AC0U8tical System to Detect Larvae in Infested Commodities .. 492 STUDENT SYMPOSIUM: ALTERNATIVES TO CHEMICAL CONTROL OF INSECTS Preface . 505 ORR, D. B.-Scelionid Wasps as Biological Control Agents: A Review .
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
    Deyrup: List of Florida Ants 43 AN UPDATED LIST OF FLORIDA ANTS (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) MARK DEYRUP Archbold Biological Station, P.O. Box 2057, Lake Placid, FL 33862 ABSTRACT A list of ants of Florida published in 1989 is replaced to accommodate 49 additional species now known from Florida, and 34 name changes in species already on the 1989 list. Cur- rently, 218 species of ants are reliably reported from Florida. Key Words: exotic species, faunistics RESUMEN Se presenta una nueva lista de las hormigas de Florida para reemplazar una lista publicada en 1989. La nueva lista incluya 49 mas especies y 34 cambios de nomenclatura. Al presente, 218 especies de hormigas son sabidas a hallarse en Florida. In 1989 Deyrup et al. published a list of the nine exotic species that have been added to the ants of Florida. In the ensuing thirteen years list. Most of the added Florida records are either there has been considerable myrmecological ac- native species whose Florida populations have tivity, both survey work in Florida, and taxonomic been recently discovered, or native species that descriptions and revisions. Consequently, the have recently been described or are awaiting de- 1989 list is drastically out of date: there are 49 ad- scription. ditional species to be added to the list, 34 name The number of species listed below, 218, is the changes that apply to species already on the 1989 largest ant fauna known from any state in eastern list, and 4 species that have been removed from North America, and is likely to remain so, even af- the list because the records are probably based on ter other large states have received as much at- misidentifications.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List the Journal Of
    12 4 1935 the journal of biodiversity data 29 July 2016 Check List LISTS OF SPECIES Check List 12(4): 1935, 29 July 2016 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15560/12.4.1935 ISSN 1809-127X © 2016 Check List and Authors A checklist and assemblage comparison of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from the Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge in Oklahoma Karl A. Roeder1* and Diane V. Roeder1, 2 1 Department of Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA 2 Oklahoma Biological Survey, Norman, OK, 73019, USA * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: We present a checklist of 47 ant species One such program built to conserve, manage, and if (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from the Wichita Mountains needed, restore the native flora and fauna of designated Wildlife Refuge in Oklahoma, USA. Surveys conducted areas across the United States is the National Wildlife in 2015 recaptured 67% of all historically collected Refuge System. Created in the early 1900s, this system species and add 12 new county records including the now exists in all 50 states and US territories (Meretsky new state records of Pheidole tetra and Solenopsis aurea. et al. 2006). Oklahoma hosts nine refuges including We demonstrate the importance of sampling multiple the Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge (hereafter habitats for species inventories as forests and grasslands WMWR) located in the southwestern part of the state. contained compositionally unique ant assemblages. We At the WMWR, species lists exist for amphibians, birds, also report an absence of the invasive red imported fire mammals, plants, and reptiles. Yet an updated list for ant, Solenopsis invicta, at all sampling locations despite one notable taxon, ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), is its occupation of the surrounding area and the southern missing.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Diversity and Biogeography of Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Louisiana with Notes on Their Ecology Shawn T
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2004 Species diversity and biogeography of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Louisiana with notes on their ecology Shawn T. Dash Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Dash, Shawn T., "Species diversity and biogeography of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Louisiana with notes on their ecology" (2004). LSU Master's Theses. 2215. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2215 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SPECIES DIVERSITY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF ANTS (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) IN LOUISIANA, WITH NOTES ON THEIR ECOLOGY A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Science In The Department of Entomology by Shawn T. Dash B.S., University of Delaware, 2002 December 2004 Dedication This work is dedicated to my mother, who got up before dawn to take me bird watching when I was young, who “allowed” me to use the bathtub for my turtles, who never minded hundreds of bottles and cans of insects in the freezer. Two other people share responsibility for who I am today, and I dedicate this work to them as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Synonymic List of Neotropical Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
    Biota Colombiana ISSN: 0124-5376 [email protected] Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos "Alexander von Humboldt" Colombia Fernández, Fernando; Sendoya, Sebastián Synonymic list of Neotropical ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Biota Colombiana, vol. 5, núm. 1, junio, 2004, pp. 3-105 Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos "Alexander von Humboldt" Bogotá, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=49150101 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Biota Colombiana 5 (1) 3 -105, 2004 Synonymic list of Neotropical ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Fernando Fernández1 and Sebastián Sendoya2 1Profesor Asociado, Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, AA 7495, Bogotá D.C, Colombia. [email protected] 2 Programa de Becas ABC, Sistema de Información en Biodiversidad y Proyecto Atlas de la Biodiversidad de Colombia, Instituto Alexander von Humboldt. [email protected] Key words: Formicidae, Ants, Taxa list, Neotropical Region, Synopsis Introduction Ant Phylogeny Ants are conspicuous and dominant all over the All ants belong to the family Formicidae, in the superfamily globe. Their diversity and abundance both peak in the tro- Vespoidea, within the order Hymenoptera. The most widely pical regions of the world and gradually decline towards accepted phylogentic schemes for the superfamily temperate latitudes. Nonetheless, certain species such as Vespoidea place the ants as a sister group to Vespidae + Formica can be locally abundant in some temperate Scoliidae (Brother & Carpenter 1993; Brothers 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • The Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Alabama
    THE ANTS (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) OF ALABAMA Except where reference is made to the work of others, the work described in this thesis is my own or was done in collaboration with my advisory committee. This thesis does not contain proprietary or classified information. ___________________________ Jason Allan Forster Certificate of Approval: ___________________________ ___________________________ Wayne E. Clark Michael L. Williams, Chair Professor Professor Entomology and Plant Pathology Entomology and Plant Pathology ___________________________ ___________________________ George Folkerts Stephen L. McFarland Professor Dean Biological Science Graduate School THE ANTS (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) OF ALABAMA Jason Allan Forster A Thesis Submitted to The Graduate Faculty of Auburn University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Auburn, Alabama August 8, 2003 THE ANTS (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) OF ALABAMA Jason Allan Forster Permission is granted to Auburn University to make copies of this thesis at its discretion upon request of individuals or institutions and at their expense. The author reserves all publication rights. ___________________________ Jason Allan Forster ___________________________ Date iii VITA Jason Allan Forster was born August 23, 1975 in Anaheim, California to Edward and Sheila Forster. He graduated from Loara High School in 1993 and enlisted in the United States Navy. After serving four years in the Navy, Jason was honorably discharged and became a full time student, receiving a Bachelor of Science degree in Biology from the University of Alabama- Huntsville in April, 2002. After graduating, he spent a summer working as a field technician in Auburn University’s Department of Wildlife Biology. Jason was accepted into the Entomology and Plant Pathology Department as a graduate student in August, 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • A Monograph of the Genus Pheidole in Florida (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida March 1985 A MONOGRAPH OF THE GENUS PHEIDOLE IN FLORIDA (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) Marcio A. Naves Brazil Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Naves, Marcio A., "A MONOGRAPH OF THE GENUS PHEIDOLE IN FLORIDA (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE)" (1985). Insecta Mundi. 519. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/519 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Vol. 1, no. 2, March 1985 INSECTA MUNDI 5 3 A MONOGRAPH OF THE GENUS PHEIDOLE IN FLORIDA (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) BY Marcio A. Naves INTRODUCTION The genus Pheidole is one of the more important ant With the help of keys and scanning electron micrographs genera in the world Approximately 1000 species are now it is now possible to identify, with relative ease, both the majors known. Over 400 of these are found in the Neotropical region and the workers of the species of this genus known to occur in (Kempf, 1972), and about 75 taxa are known from North Florida America north of Mexico. Pheidole spp. are abundant in many areas, and live in varying habitats ranging from the humid tropics REVIEW OF LITERATURE. Four of twelve species to deserts. They are able to survive in some areas by their habits reported from Florida have that state as the type locality of the of collecting and storing seeds as food resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Djvu Document
    Vol. 1, no. 2, ~1areh 1985 INSECTA I1UNDI 53 -----------I.A..- ~S~------ PHEIDOLE~A By Marcia A. Naves 2 INTRODUCTION The genus Pheidole is one of the more illll'ortant ant With the help ofkeys and seanning eleetron mierographs genera in the world Approximately 1000 speeies are now it is now possible to identify, with relative ease, both the majors known. Over 400 of these are found in the Neotropical region and the workers of the species of this genus known to occur in (Kempf, 1972), and about 75 taxa are known from North Florida America north ofMexico. Pheidole spp. are abundant in many areas, and live in varying habitats rangingfrom the humidtropies REVIEW OF LITERATURE. Four of twelve spedes to deserts. They are able to survive in some areas by their habits reported from Florida have that state as the type locality ofthe ofeolieeting and storing seeds as food resourees. They are also speGies: P. dentata Mayr(UHl6), P. floridana Emery(l&95), R scavengers of dead insects and other animals, and can be metallescens Emery (1895), and P. sitarches litorallis Cole predacious. Some speGies tends aphids and other homopterans, (1952). but this food source, so important to many ant species, is Smith(1930) reportedP. morrisi; Wheeler(1932) reported probably of relatively minor importanGe to most speGies of R anastasii; Smith (1933) reported R megacephalii; Smith Pheidole. (1944) reported P. dentigula; Smith(1951) reported P. flavens Pheidole apparently is a geilUS ofrather recentevolutionary sculj)tlOr (misidentification); Van Pelt (1956) reported R development No fossil Pheidole are known previous to the pili/era; Smith (1958) reportedP.
    [Show full text]