Molecular Regulation of BRD3 in Forward Programming of Megakaryocytes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Molecular Regulation of BRD3 in Forward Programming of Megakaryocytes Molecular regulation of BRD3 in forward programming of Megakaryocytes Maria Isabel Marques Rosa University of Cambridge Newnham College This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2018 Declaration This dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It is not substantially the same as any that I have submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for a degree or diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. I further state that no substantial part of my dissertation has already been submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for any such degree, diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It does not exceed the prescribed word limit for the relevant Degree Committee. Isabel Rosa September 2018 “Quando de lá vimos, é que para lá havíamos de ir” “The moment when one finishes a journey, is when they are truly ready to start.” Ernesto Rosa, my Dad Table of contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Haematopoiesis................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.1. Embryonic haematopoiesis...................................................................................... 3 1.1.2. Adult haematopoiesis, an evolving model ................................................................ 5 1.2 Megakaryopoiesis................................................................................................................ 9 1.2.1. Megakaryopoiesis development .................................................................................... 9 1.2.2. Megakaryopoiesis regulation .......................................................................................12 1.2.3. Platelets......................................................................................................................16 1.2.4. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) ....................................................................18 1.3 Bromodomains ...................................................................................................................22 1.3.1. Bromodomain modules ...............................................................................................22 1.3.2. Bromodomain proteins (BRDs) in transcription .............................................................24 1.3.3. BET proteins in transcription regulation and cell cycle progression .................................25 1.3.4. BET inhibition ..............................................................................................................26 1.3.5. BRD3-GATA-1 interaction.............................................................................................27 1.4 Model systems to study megakaryopoiesis...........................................................................28 1.4.1. Animal models ............................................................................................................28 1.4.2. Immortalised cell lines .................................................................................................28 1.4.3. Stem cell models .........................................................................................................29 1.4.4. in vitro models of megakaryopoiesis .............................................................................30 1.4.3. Genetic manipulation system- CRISPR/Cas9 ..................................................................32 1.5 Chromatin and gene transcription .......................................................................................34 1.5.1. Chromatin structure organisation.................................................................................34 1.5.2. Transcriptional regulation ............................................................................................35 1.6 The aims of my project........................................................................................................40 Material and Methods..................................................................................................................41 2.1. Cell culture ....................................................................................................................42 2.2. Molecular techniques .....................................................................................................46 2.3. Bioinformatics analysis ...................................................................................................56 Results ........................................................................................................................................61 3.1 Generation of an iPSC BRD3 KO model .................................................................................62 3.1.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................62 3.1.2 Results.........................................................................................................................64 3.1.3 Discussion ....................................................................................................................80 3.2 BRD3 regulation in Megakaryopoiesis ..................................................................................84 3.2.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................84 3.2.2 Results.........................................................................................................................85 3.2.3 Discussion ....................................................................................................................96 3.3 BET inhibition in Megakaryopoiesis.................................................................................... 100 3.3.1 Introduction............................................................................................................... 100 3.3.2 Results....................................................................................................................... 101 3.3.3 Discussion .................................................................................................................. 118 3.4 BET regulation in Megakaryopoiesis................................................................................... 121 3.4.1 Introduction............................................................................................................... 121 3.4.2 Results....................................................................................................................... 122 3.4.3. Discussion ................................................................................................................. 132 Conclusion and future work........................................................................................................ 134 References ................................................................................................................................ 138 Appendix ................................................................................................................................... 170 6.1. Plasmids.......................................................................................................................... 171 6.1.1 Plasmids used for generation of Knockouts .................................................................. 171 6.1.2 Plasmids used for generation viral particles containing TFs for FoP protocol .................. 174 6.1.3 Plasmids used for generation of Knockdowns............................................................... 177 6.2 Alignment of Sanger sequences to confirm sgRNAs insertions ............................................. 179 6.2. Differentially expressed genes in BRD3 KO ........................................................................ 181 6.2.1 BRD3 KO iPSC ............................................................................................................. 181 6.2.1 BRD3 KO MKs ............................................................................................................. 183 6.3. BET inhibition - appendix.................................................................................................. 186 Acknowledgments .............................................................................................................. 187 List of figures Introduction Figure 1.1.1 Sequential waves of embryonic haematopoiesis………………………………………………………………4 Figure 1.1.2 Diagram of canonical haematopoietic tree………………………………………………………………..…….7 Figure 1.2.1 Redefined model of human blood lineage formation……………………………………….…………….10 Figure 1.2.2 BRD3 locus zoom plot with SNP association for volume of platelets………………………………..20 Figure 1.2.3. BRD3 locus zoom plot with SNP association for distribution width of the volume of platelets………………………………………………………………………………………………....……………………………....………21
Recommended publications
  • MECHANISMS of TUMORIGENESIS in AFRICAN AMERICAN COLORECTAL CANCER by Gaius J. Augustus
    Mechanisms of Tumorigenesis in African American Colorectal Cancer Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Augustus, Gaius Julian Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 27/09/2021 11:20:21 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/633006 MECHANISMS OF TUMORIGENESIS IN AFRICAN AMERICAN COLORECTAL CANCER by Gaius J. Augustus __________________________ Copyright © Gaius J. Augustus 2019 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the GRADUATE INTERDISCIPLINARY PROGRAM IN CANCER BIOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2019 Mechanisms of Tumorigenesis in African American CRC 2 Mechanisms of Tumorigenesis in African American CRC Acknowledgements This work was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute (U01 CA153060 and P30 CA023074, NAE; RO1 CA204808, HRG, EM, LTH; RO1 CA141057, BJ) and the American Cancer Society Illinois Division (223187, XL). GJA was supported by a Cancer Biology Training Grant (T32CA009213). The funders had no role in the design of the study; the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data; the writing of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The author gratefully acknowledges the recruiters of the CCCC for their dedication and integrity, including Maggie Moran, Timothy Carroll, Katy Ceryes, Amy Disharoon, Archana Krishnan, Katie Morrissey, Maureen Regan, and Katya Seligman.
    [Show full text]
  • Replication Stress: Mechanisms and Molecules Involved in DNA Replication Progression and Reinitiation
    Replication stress: mechanisms and molecules involved in DNA replication progression and reinitiation Sònia Feu i Coll Aquesta tesi doctoral està subjecta a la llicència Reconeixement- NoComercial – CompartirIgual 4.0. Espanya de Creative Commons. Esta tesis doctoral está sujeta a la licencia Reconocimiento - NoComercial – CompartirIgual 4.0. España de Creative Commons. This doctoral thesis is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 4.0. Spain License. DOCTORAL PROGRAMME IN BIOMEDICINE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA Replication stress: mechanisms and molecules involved in DNA replication progression and reinitiation Thesis presented by Sònia Feu i Coll to qualify for the degree of Doctor in Biomedicine by the University of Barcelona This thesis has been performed in the Department of Biomedicine of the School of Medicine and Health Science of University of Barcelona, under the supervision of Prof. Neus Agell i Jané, Ph.D. Barcelona, March 2019 “A journey of a thousand miles begins with one step” Benjamin Franklin ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Quan arribo a aquestes línies, toca una visualització breu (o això espero) dels anys que deixo enrere. Ara ja farà gairebé 6 anys que vaig entrar per primera vegada al laboratori de Senyalització i Checkpoints del Cicle Cel·lular. En aquell moment encara no sabia on em portaria la vida, ni la ciència! L’estiu abans de començar el Màster de Biomedicina estava fent entrevistes per tal d’escollir el grup on fer el Treball Final i em vaig topar amb tu, Neus. Per què em vaig decidir fer el màster al teu grup? Bàsicament per tu, pel que em vas transmetre i inspirar.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterisation of Novel Functions of the Anaphase Promoting Complex/Cyclosome and Its Regulation Through Post-Translational Modification
    CHARACTERISATION OF NOVEL FUNCTIONS OF THE ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX/CYCLOSOME AND ITS REGULATION THROUGH POST-TRANSLATIONAL MODIFICATION by PAUL EDWARD MINSHALL A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Cancer Sciences College of Medical and Dental Sciences University of Birmingham October 2014 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The Anaphase Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) is a multi-subunit E3 ubiquitin ligase that regulates mitotic progression through targeting substrates for degradation by the 26S proteasome. In order to assess APC/C post-translational modification status, and identify novel APC/C substrates and regulators, a comprehensive analysis of the APC/C and APC/C-interacting proteins by mass spectrometry was undertaken. RNA polymerase I was identified as an APC/C-interacting complex, and the interaction was validated by reciprocal co-immunoprecipitation, GST pull-down and immunofluorescent confocal microscopy. Both RPA194 protein levels and RNA Polymerase I transcription were shown to be dependent upon APC/C activity. Ablation of APC/C function by RNAi increased RPA194 protein levels, and elevated RNA polymerase I activity significantly, as quantified by 5’-Fluorouridine incorporation into nascent pre-rRNA, and the increase in absolute levels of 45S, 28S and 18S rRNA transcripts, relative to non- silencing controls.
    [Show full text]
  • DO5883929COR.Pdf
    UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO FACULDADE DE ZOOTECNIA E ENGENHARIA DE ALIMENTOS PÂMELA ALMEIDA ALEXANDRE Abordagem de biologia de sistemas para a determinação de mecanismos moleculares associados à eficiência alimentar de bovinos Nelore Pirassununga 2018 PÂMELA ALMEIDA ALEXANDRE Abordagem de biologia de sistemas para a determinação de mecanismos moleculares associados à eficiência alimentar de bovinos Nelore Versão corrigida Tese apresentada à Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos da Universidade de São Paulo, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do Título de Doutora em Ciências do programa de pós-graduação em Biociência Animal. Área de concentração: Genética, Biologia Molecular e Celular. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Heidge Fukumasu Pirassununga 2018 PÂMELA ALMEIDA ALEXANDRE Abordagem de biologia de sistemas para a determinação de mecanismos moleculares associados à eficiência alimentar de bovinos Nelore Tese apresentada à Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos da Universidade de São Paulo, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do Título de Doutora em Ciências do programa de pós-graduação em Biociência Animal. Data de aprovação: 25/01/2019 Banca Examinadora: Prof. Dr. Heidge Fukumasu Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos – Universidade de São Paulo Presidente da Banca Examinadora Prof. Dr. Fernando Sebastián Baldi Rey Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” - Campus Jaboticabal Prof. Dr. José Bento Sterman Ferraz Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos – Universidade de São Paulo Dra. Aline Silva Mello César Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz” – Universidade de São Paulo Dr. Miguel Henrique de Almeida Santana Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos – Universidade de São Paulo Dra. Polyana Cristine Tizioto NGS Soluções Genômicas Aos meus amados pais, Heleni e Wanderlei, pelos valores ensinados e apoio incondicional em cada passo da minha jornada.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Book
    ORAL PRESENTATIONS Glaucoma XXII Biennial Meeting of the International Society for Eye Research September 25-29, 2016 | Tokyo, Japan ABSTRACT BOOK www.iserbiennialmeeting.org1 CONTENT Glaucoma 6 GLA1 - Cell Plasticity, Fibrogenic Mechanisms and Glaucoma 6 GLA2 - Major identifi ed players in glaucoma – genes and signaling pathways 8 GLA3 - Restoring Conventional Outfl ow 11 GLA4 - ONH/NFL imaging in glaucoma 13 GLA6 - Biomechanics of glaucoma 18 GLA7 - Biology of the TM 21 GLA8 - Distal Outfl ow Resistance: Towards Understanding MIGS 23 GLA9 - Status of glaucoma gene and stem cell therapy 25 GLA10 - Lymphangiogenesis, Lymphatics and IOP Regulation 29 JNT1 (GLA+OMG) - Genetics of glaucoma 30 Lens 33 LEN1 - Lens Development 33 LEN2 - Oxidative Stress 35 LEN3 - Biomarkers in Cataractogenesis 37 LEN4 - Lens Regeneration and Evolution 40 LEN6 - Animal Models of Cataract 45 LEN7 - Lens Cytoskeleton 47 LEN8 - Post-translational modifi cation of crystallins 50 LEN9 - PCO/EMT 52 LEN10 - The Zonule of Zinn: biology and pathology 55 LEN11 - Alpha crystallins and small heat-shock proteins 57 LEN12 - Physiological Optics 58 Cornea and Ocular Surface 62 COS1 - Corneal Infection 62 COS2 - Emerging paradigms in stromal regenerative biology 63 COS3 - Corneal Endothelium: Pathophysiology and Treatment 65 COS4 - Corneal Refractive Surgeries 68 COS5 - Cornea Transplantation and keratoprothesis 69 COS6 - Keratoconus biology and treatment 71 COS7 - New Diagnosis and Therapies for Corneal Diseases 73 COS8 - Ocular Surface Epithelial Homeostasis (Conjunctival, Limbal,
    [Show full text]
  • A Meta-Analysis of Parkinson's Disease Data
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Sex-Specific Transcriptome Differences in Substantia Nigra Tissue: A Meta-Analysis of Parkinson’s Disease Data Elisa Mariani 1,†, Lorenza Lombardini 1,†, Federica Facchin 2, Fabrizio Pizzetti 2 ID , Flavia Frabetti 2, Andrea Tarozzi 1 and Raffaella Casadei 1,* 1 Department for Life Quality Studies, University of Bologna, 47900 Rimini, Italy; [email protected] (E.M.); [email protected] (L.L.); [email protected] (A.T.) 2 Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy; [email protected] (F.F.); [email protected] (F.P.); fl[email protected] (F.F.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-0541-434615 † These authors contributed equally to this work. Received: 28 March 2018; Accepted: 18 May 2018; Published: 25 May 2018 Abstract: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is one of the most common progressive neurodegenerative diseases. Clinical and epidemiological studies indicate that sex differences, as well as genetic components and ageing, can influence the prevalence, age at onset and symptomatology of PD. This study undertook a systematic meta-analysis of substantia nigra microarray data using the Transcriptome Mapper (TRAM) software to integrate and normalize a total of 10 suitable datasets from multiple sources. Four different analyses were performed according to default parameters, to better define the segments differentially expressed between PD patients and healthy controls, when comparing men and women data sets. The results suggest a possible regulation of specific sex-biased systems in PD susceptibility. TRAM software allowed us to highlight the different activation of some genomic regions and loci involved in molecular pathways related to neurodegeneration and neuroinflammatory mechanisms.
    [Show full text]