Reporting Back to the Community

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reporting Back to the Community The Poverty of Poverty Intervention: Doing More with Less Reporting Back to the Community Prepared by Office of Community Engagement and Partnerships University of South Florida Jennifer Webb Research Assistant Lance Arney, Ph.D. Associate Director OFFICE OF COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND PARTNERSHIPS University of South Florida • 4202 East Fowler Avenue, ALN 185 • Tampa, FL 33620 (813) 974-4829 • www.usf.edu/engagement • [email protected] Building Partnerships to Improve Our Communities The University of South Florida is a high-impact, global research university dedicated to student success. USF is a Top 50 research uni- versity among both public and private institutions nationwide in total research expenditures, according to the National Science Foundation. Serving nearly 48,000 students, the USF System has an annual budget of $1.5 billion and an annual economic impact of $4.4 billion. USF is one of 40 public research universities nationwide with very high research activity that is designated as Community Engaged by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. The Carnegie Foundation defines community engagement as “collab- oration between institutions of higher education and their larger com- munities (local, regional/state, national, global) for the mutually ben- eficial exchange of knowledge and resources in a context of partner- ship and reciprocity. The purpose of community engagement is the partnership of college and university knowledge and resources with those of the public and private sectors to enrich scholarship, research, and creative activity; enhance curriculum, teaching and learning; pre- pare educated, engaged citizens; strengthen democratic values and civic responsibility; address critical societal issues; and contribute to the public good.”1 1 http://classifications.carnegiefoundation.org/descriptions/community_engagement.php OFFICE OF COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND PARTNERSHIPS University of South Florida • 4202 East Fowler Avenue, ALN 185 • Tampa, FL 33620 (813) 974-4829 • www.usf.edu/engagement • [email protected] Building Partnerships to Improve Our Communities Executive Summary The University of South Florida is a high-impact, global research university. Community engagement guides its mission. As Florida’s leading metropolitan research university, USF is dedicated to: . Research and scientific discovery to strengthen the economy, promote civic culture and the arts, and design and build sus- tainable communities through the generation, dissemination, and translation of new knowledge across all academic and health-related disciplines. Partnerships to build significant locally- and globally-integrated university-community collaborations through sound scholarly and artistic activities and technological innovation. USF created the Office of Community Engagement and Partner- ships (OCEP) in 2009. The mission of our office is to expand local and global initiatives that strengthen and sustain healthy communities, promote social justice, and help improve the quality of life for all. The OCEP carries out its mission by building mutually beneficial and re- ciprocal university–community partnerships founded on community engaged research, scholarship, and service-learning. On January 29, 2014, the OCEP held a half-day forum titled The Poverty of Poverty Intervention: Doing More with Less at the Children’s Board of Hillsborough County in Tampa, Florida. The forum was de- signed to foster more dialogue and collaboration between the univer- sity and the community in order to break through the invisible dis- tance between university researchers and activists in the trenches. We are all intent on reaching the same goals of understanding poverty and finding pathways for individuals and families who are struggling to get out of it. 3 Indeed, so many of us—in the community and at the university— are precariously teetering on the brink of financial distress, or have already begun falling into long-term financial despair. It is therefore crucial that we come together in solidarity, identify the root causes of such pervasive economic hardship, and take action to improve our quality of life by reducing poverty and inequality in our region. • • • This report presents some of the results of this forum. In particu- lar, the OCEP responds to participant feedback and recommendations as to how USF can create constructive dialogue with the community about ways to build mutually beneficial relationships, as well as strengthen already existing partnerships, that address the causes, con- sequences, and best ways to reduce poverty and alleviate its symp- toms. Defining the Problem and Identifying Constraints on Provision of Services We have entered a new era for combating poverty—one of greatly increased demand for poverty related services as well as a growing scarcity of resources to meet those needs. We are in a period of new fiscal austerity that has greatly hindered efforts to alleviate these prob- lems. Participants at our poverty forum are already well aware of these problems. They noted the negative impact that specific policies and budget cuts have had on the populations and clients they serve. Like- wise, they understand that austerity measures are straining each or- ganization’s operational and program budgets. Additionally, the ma- jority of forum participants reported that, in general, the provision of services is being harmed by a political culture and legislative language that poison the public discussion of social welfare. 4 Bridging the Apparent Divide between USF and the Community Forum participants described collaborating with USF in ways that could help bring about more systemic change. USF’s emphasis on re- search and scientific discovery were hailed as significant assets in the overall endeavor to improve service provision in Tampa and work to- ward reducing poverty and inequality in the region. Forum partici- pants expressed a desire for USF to work with local service providers on the following objectives: . Identify common ground with local service providers and assist in building sustainable partnerships on areas of mutual concern. Encourage basic and applied research that will directly benefit low-income families and individuals in the region as well as those who work to improve their quality of life. Help initiate, or mediate, candid and courageous conversations about poverty and inequality with leaders and decision makers. Provide ongoing training to local service providers and primary and secondary educators using evidence-based principles, prac- tices, and research. Act as an incubator for innovative, paradigm-shifting ap- proaches to addressing poverty and inequality. Work with service providers to identify new funding sources; help make better use of current funding sources by joining community partners in advising funders on how best to allocate grant dollars based on actual community need; and help pre- serve and protect existing funding streams from exhaustion or termination. 5 Public Scholarship The university as an institution strives to be objective. This institu- tional neutrality, however, should not constrain the academic free- dom, social activism, and/or public scholarship of individual profes- sors. Forum participants repeatedly expressed this expectation in a variety of ways. They want USF professors to: . translate research findings and scholarship into plain language so that it is more accessible to wider audiences (a process known as “knowledge translation”); . write op-ed pieces in local newspapers; . be more available to news reporters to provide expert com- mentary on the issues of the day; . develop collaborative research projects with service providers, and with more of an emphasis on application of research results in the local community; and . sit on the boards of directors of local organizations. Indeed, multiple groups expressed a strong desire for USF profes- sors to take on the leadership role of public scholar on important so- cial issues related to their research interests and areas of expertise, especially regarding issues of significance to the local region. Technical Assistance, Trainings, and Professional Development Forum participants spoke with nearly one voice in their request for technical assistance, trainings, and professional development. In particular, many organizations said they would like to seek assistance with doing needs assessments, program evaluations, and measuring impacts of their programs on the community. 6 Integrating Undergraduate Students in Innovative Ways Forum participants recommended that students be linked to or- ganizations based on students’ particular interests. Once these con- nections are made, forum participants envisioned undergraduates fill- ing advocacy and direct service roles from letter writing and mobili- zation efforts to teaching parents about resources, assisting with out- reach, and tutoring, among other activities. Policy Centered Research Many forum participants called for systematic evaluation of the impact that certain policies are having locally, noting that by system- atically studying the disparate impacts of public policy, we can more effectively address the needs of the most vulnerable in our commu- nity. Action Groups Forum participants also recommended forming action groups that will “actually make something happen!” Service providers are looking to USF to help create sustainable partnerships to address poverty and inequality, as well as join the com- munity in engaging decision makers and
Recommended publications
  • Official List of Members
    OFFICIAL LIST OF MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES of the UNITED STATES AND THEIR PLACES OF RESIDENCE ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS • DECEMBER 15, 2020 Compiled by CHERYL L. JOHNSON, Clerk of the House of Representatives http://clerk.house.gov Democrats in roman (233); Republicans in italic (195); Independents and Libertarians underlined (2); vacancies (5) CA08, CA50, GA14, NC11, TX04; total 435. The number preceding the name is the Member's district. ALABAMA 1 Bradley Byrne .............................................. Fairhope 2 Martha Roby ................................................ Montgomery 3 Mike Rogers ................................................. Anniston 4 Robert B. Aderholt ....................................... Haleyville 5 Mo Brooks .................................................... Huntsville 6 Gary J. Palmer ............................................ Hoover 7 Terri A. Sewell ............................................. Birmingham ALASKA AT LARGE Don Young .................................................... Fort Yukon ARIZONA 1 Tom O'Halleran ........................................... Sedona 2 Ann Kirkpatrick .......................................... Tucson 3 Raúl M. Grijalva .......................................... Tucson 4 Paul A. Gosar ............................................... Prescott 5 Andy Biggs ................................................... Gilbert 6 David Schweikert ........................................ Fountain Hills 7 Ruben Gallego ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • April 24, 2020 (Florida Federal Qualifying) Report
    2020 Florida Federal Candidate Qualifying Report / Finance Reports Cumulative Totals through March 31, 2020 Office Currently Elected Challenger Party Contributions Expenditures Total COH CD01 Matt Gaetz REP $ 1,638,555.81 $ 1,284,221.76 $ 496,295.82 CD01 Phil Ehr DEM $ 342,943.79 $ 188,474.53 $ 154,469.26 CD01 Greg Merk REP $ - $ - $ - CD01 John Mills REP $ 5,000.00 $ 5,132.61 $ 145.02 CD01 Albert Oram* NPA CD02 Neal Dunn REP $ 297,532.04 $ 264,484.41 $ 419,201.78 CD02 Kim O'Connor* WRI CD02 Kristy Thripp* WRI CD03 OPEN - Ted Yoho REP CD03 Kat Cammack REP $ 207,007.59 $ 41,054.05 $ 165,953.54 CD03 Ryan Chamberlin REP $ 101,333.00 $ 4,025.39 $ 97,307.61 CD03 Todd Chase REP $ 163,621.68 $ 27,032.07 $ 136,589.61 CD03 Adam Christensen DEM $ - $ - $ - CD03 Philip Dodds DEM $ 6,301.17 $ 4,035.13 $ 2,266.04 CD03 Bill Engelbrecht REP $ 27,050.00 $ 4,955.94 $ 22,094.06 CD03 Joe Dallas Millado* REP CD03 Gavin Rollins REP $ 106,370.00 $ 9,730.33 $ 96,639.67 CD03 Judson Sapp REP $ 430,233.01 $ 120,453.99 $ 310,011.88 CD03 Ed Silva* WRI CD03 James St. George REP $ 400,499.60 $ 64,207.88 $ 336,291.72 CD03 David Theus REP $ 6,392.11 $ 473.58 $ 5,918.53 CD03 Amy Pope Wells REP $ 56,982.45 $ 46,896.17 $ 10,086.28 CD03 Tom Wells DEM $ 1,559.31 $ 1,289.68 $ 295.58 CD04 John Rutherford REP $ 513,068.32 $ 281,060.16 $ 597,734.31 CD04 Erick Aguilar REP $ 11,342.00 $ 6,220.00 $ 5,122.00 CD04 Donna Deegan DEM $ 425,901.36 $ 165,436.85 $ 260,464.51 CD04 Gary Koniz* WRI CD05 Al Lawson DEM $ 355,730.10 $ 168,874.69 $ 201,527.67 CD05 Gary Adler REP $ 40,325.00 $ 920.08 $ 39,404.92 CD05 Albert Chester DEM $ 43,230.65 $ 28,044.61 $ 15,186.04 CD05 Roger Wagoner REP $ - $ - $ - CD06 Michael Waltz REP $ 1,308,541.18 $ 626,699.95 $ 733,402.64 CD06 Clint Curtis DEM $ 13,503.79 $ 1,152.12 $ 12,351.67 CD06 Alan Grayson WRI $ 69,913.27 $ 56,052.54 $ 716,034.49 CD06 John.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Uus! Want to Send a Message to Your U.S
    Florida UUs! Want to send a message to your U.S. Representative about issues that are important to you? Host a Write Here! Write Now! letter-writing table and ​ ​ tell your U.S. Representative what’s on your mind Floridians -- it’s a New Congress with New Opportunities to tell returning and five new U.S. Representatives in Washington - that’s nearly 20% of the state’s delegation - what’s on your mind. These new and returning U.S. Representatives need to hear from us. The new Congress ​ represents a “fresh start” for our advocacy efforts. New U.S. House of Representative Florida Members: Michael Waltz (R FL-6); Ross Spano (R FL-15); Greg ​ Steube (R FL-17); Debbie Mucarsel-Powell (D FL-26); Donna Shalala (D FL-27). Americans are tired of partisan strife and dysfunctional government. The nation needs a Congress that takes bipartisan action and uses the democratic process to address the challenges that confront us as a people and as a nation. Tell members to seek bipartisan solutions to pressing issues UUs care about. ​ Write letter to your Representatives and the UUs for Social Justice (UUSJ) Capitol Hill Advocacy Corps, in ​ ​ Washington, D.C. will deliver them directly to offices on February 12. The Advocacy Corps will visit new and returning members and new committee and subcommittee leadership. That’s why it’s the perfect time for us to ​ take our UU values and UU wishes for the nation to Capitol Hill. UUSJ invites you and your congregation’s participation in its monthly nationwide Write Here! Write Now! ​ letter-writing campaign to raise UU voices on Capitol Hill on important social justice issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Waltz Florida Dems PPP Letter (/Uploadedfiles/Waltzsba FDP PPP)
    October 8, 2020 The Honorable Hannibal “Mike” Ware Inspector General U.S. Small Business Administration 409 3rd Street SW Washington, D.C. 20416 Dear Inspector General Ware: The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) was designed to provide a direct incentive for small businesses to keep their workers on the payroll. Congress intended the program to provide relief to America’s small businesses quickly, and demand for the program was extraordinary: PPP lenders approved more than 1.6 million loans totaling more than $342 billion in the program’s first two weeks, according to your office.1 The Small Business Administration subsequently released data that shows a political organization may have taken advantage of the program’s expedited nature to obtain funds for which they were ineligible. Specifically, the data show a Democrat-affiliated political organization in Florida applied for and received PPP funds, contrary to the intent of Congress that the program should support small businesses, non-profits, veterans’ organizations, and tribal concerns. The Small Business Administration issued regulations that specifically prohibit “businesses primarily engaged in political or lobbying activities” from receiving PPP loans.2 Despite this restriction, the Florida Democratic Party (FDP) applied for and received a PPP loan worth $780,000.3 The details of the FDP loan application raise serious questions as to whether the applicant intentionally misled the Small Business Administration in order to obtain PPP funds. FDP filed its application under the identity of a non-profit organization called the “Florida Democratic Party Building Fund, Inc.” The Florida Democratic Party Building Fund, Inc. is a separate legal entity from the Florida Democratic Party, but Florida state records show the party formed the not-for-profit corporation in April of 2019 to construct, own or operate “the headquarters of the state executive committee of the Florida Democratic Party and related political organizations.”4 Documents show the Florida Democratic Party Building Fund, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012
    VERIZON POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS JANUARY – DECEMBER 2012 1 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012 A Message from Craig Silliman Verizon is affected by a wide variety of government policies ‐‐ from telecommunications regulation to taxation to health care and more ‐‐ that have an enormous impact on the business climate in which we operate. We owe it to our shareowners, employees and customers to advocate public policies that will enable us to compete fairly and freely in the marketplace. Political contributions are one way we support the democratic electoral process and participate in the policy dialogue. Our employees have established political action committees at the federal level and in 20 states. These political action committees (PACs) allow employees to pool their resources to support candidates for office who generally support the public policies our employees advocate. This report lists all PAC contributions, corporate political contributions, support for ballot initiatives and independent expenditures made by Verizon in 2012. The contribution process is overseen by the Corporate Governance and Policy Committee of our Board of Directors, which receives a comprehensive report and briefing on these activities at least annually. We intend to update this voluntary disclosure twice a year and publish it on our corporate website. We believe this transparency with respect to our political spending is in keeping with our commitment to good corporate governance and a further sign of our responsiveness to the interests of our shareowners. Craig L. Silliman Senior Vice President, Public Policy 2 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012 Political Contributions Policy: Our Voice in the Political Process What are the Verizon Good Government Clubs? and the government agencies administering the federal and individual state election laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida RESTAURANT INDUSTRY at a GLANCE
    Florida RESTAURANT INDUSTRY AT A GLANCE Restaurants are a driving force in Florida’s economy. They provide jobs and build careers for thousands of people, and play a vital role in local communities throughout the state. 41,366 1,096,000 Eating and drinking place Restaurant and foodservice jobs locations in Florida in 2018 in Florida in 2019 = 12% of employment in the state And by 2029, that number is projected $50.1 billion to grow by 14.1% Estimated sales in Florida’s = 154,700 additional jobs, restaurants in 2018 for a total of 1,250,700 Every dollar spent in the tableservice segment HOW DOES THE contributes $2.04 to the state economy. RESTAURANT INDUSTRY IMPACT THE Every dollar spent in the limited-service segment FLORIDA ECONOMY? contributes $1.73 to the state economy. FOR MORE INFORMATION: Restaurant.org • FRLA.org © 2019 National Restaurant Association. All rights reserved. Florida’s Restaurants JOBS AND ENTREPRENEURIAL OPPORTUNITIES IN EVERY COMMUNITY EATING AND DRINKING PLACES: Establishments Employees U.S. SENATORS in the state in the state* Marco Rubio (R) 41,366 828,400 Rick Scott (R) EATING AND DRINKING PLACES: EATING AND DRINKING PLACES: Establishments Employees Establishments Employees U.S. REPRESENTATIVES in the state in the state* U.S. REPRESENTATIVES in the state in the state* 1 Matt Gaetz (R) 1,525 30,536 15 Ross Spano (R) 1,061 21,239 2 Neal P. Dunn (R) 1,515 30,343 16 Vern Buchanan (R) 1,624 32,516 3 Ted S. Yoho (R) 1,134 22,704 17 W. Gregory Steube (R) 894 17,897 4 John H.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Government Officials (May 2020)
    Updated 12/07/2020 GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS PRESIDENT President Donald John Trump VICE PRESIDENT Vice President Michael Richard Pence HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS Secretary of Health and Human Services Alex Azar II Attorney General William Barr Secretary of Interior David Bernhardt Secretary of Energy Danny Ray Brouillette Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Benjamin Carson Sr. Secretary of Transportation Elaine Chao Secretary of Education Elisabeth DeVos (Acting) Secretary of Defense Christopher D. Miller Secretary of Treasury Steven Mnuchin Secretary of Agriculture George “Sonny” Perdue III Secretary of State Michael Pompeo Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross Jr. Secretary of Labor Eugene Scalia Secretary of Veterans Affairs Robert Wilkie Jr. (Acting) Secretary of Homeland Security Chad Wolf MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Ralph Abraham Jr. Alma Adams Robert Aderholt Peter Aguilar Andrew Lamar Alexander Jr. Richard “Rick” Allen Colin Allred Justin Amash Mark Amodei Kelly Armstrong Jodey Arrington Cynthia “Cindy” Axne Brian Babin Donald Bacon James “Jim” Baird William Troy Balderson Tammy Baldwin James “Jim” Edward Banks Garland Hale “Andy” Barr Nanette Barragán John Barrasso III Karen Bass Joyce Beatty Michael Bennet Amerish Babulal “Ami” Bera John Warren “Jack” Bergman Donald Sternoff Beyer Jr. Andrew Steven “Andy” Biggs Gus M. Bilirakis James Daniel Bishop Robert Bishop Sanford Bishop Jr. Marsha Blackburn Earl Blumenauer Richard Blumenthal Roy Blunt Lisa Blunt Rochester Suzanne Bonamici Cory Booker John Boozman Michael Bost Brendan Boyle Kevin Brady Michael K. Braun Anthony Brindisi Morris Jackson “Mo” Brooks Jr. Susan Brooks Anthony G. Brown Sherrod Brown Julia Brownley Vernon G. Buchanan Kenneth Buck Larry Bucshon Theodore “Ted” Budd Timothy Burchett Michael C.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Election Recap
    2020 Election Recap Below NACCHO summarizes election results and changes expected for 2021. Democrats will continue to lead the House of Representatives…but with a smaller majority. This means that many of the key committees for public health will continue to be chaired by the same members, with notable exceptions of the Appropriations Committee, where Chair Nita Lowey (D-NY) did not run for reelection; the Agriculture Committee, which has some jurisdiction around food safety and nutrition, whose Chair, Colin Peterson (D-MN) lost, as well as the Ranking Member for the Energy and Commerce Committee, Rep. Greg Walden, (R-OR) who did not run for reelection. After the 117th Congress convenes in January, internal leadership elections will determine who heads these and other committees. The following new Representatives and Senators are confirmed as of January 7. House of Representatives Note: All House of Representative seats were up for re-election. We list only those where a new member will be coming to Congress below. AL-1: Republican Jerry Carl beat Democrat James Averhart (open seat) Carl has served a member of the Mobile County Commission since 2012. He lists veterans’ health care and border security as policy priorities. Rep. Bradley Byrne (R-AL) vacated the seat to run for Senate. AL-2: Republican Barry Moore beat Democrat Phyllis Harvey-Hall (open seat) Moore served in the Alabama House of Representatives from 2010 to 2018. The seat was vacated by Rep. Martha Roby (R-AL) who retired. CA-8 Republican Jay Obernolte beat Democrat Christine Bubser (open seat) Jay Obsernolte served in the California State Assembly since 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Candidate Program
    2020 CANDIDATE PROGRAM Alan Cohn (D/FL-15) Current Seat Ross Spano (R) Holder Seat Status Leans R Alan Cohn is an investigative journalist and was the anchor and managing editor of ABC7 at 7 in Sarasota. Cohn also worked for WFTS-Channel 28 and ABC. He won the Peabody Award for a multi-year investigation of quality control issues at Sikorsky Aircraft. Cohn has also worked for NBC, New Biographical England Cable News (where he won an Emmy Award), the Sketch Boston Globe, WTIC-TV, WGGB-TV, and WAMI-TV in Miami. In 2014, Cohn ran as a Democrat for Congress in Florida's 15th congressional district, the seat held by Republican Congressman Dennis A. Ross. Cohn lost to Ross, getting 40 percent of the vote. Receipts: $588,919.81 Individual: $556,389.09 Disbursements: $459,301.01 FEC Filing as of PAC: $23,750.00 Cash on Hand: $129,618.80 10/14/2020 Party: $146.00 Debt: Candidate: $8,400.00 Other: Polling Endorsements Planned Parenthood, Sierra Club, Senator Kent Conrad, Congressman Charlie Crist 1. Healthcare 4. US Tax Code Top Campaign 2. Prescription Costs 5. Minimum Wage Issues 3. Climate Crisis 6. Social Safety Net Role of Healthcare Cohn has pledged to reform the Affordable Care Act, prevent the insurance industry from in the Campaign creating super PACs, create a public option, and implement price transparency. Florida's 15th congressional district was reassigned in 2012, effective January 2013, to the northern parts of Hillsborough and Polk counties as well as the southernmost parts of Lake. District Profile The district includes Brandon, Plant City, Lakeland and Bartow.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trump Adminis- Tration’S Oversight of the Trump Inter- National Hotel Lease
    LANDLORD AND TENANT: THE TRUMP ADMINIS- TRATION’S OVERSIGHT OF THE TRUMP INTER- NATIONAL HOTEL LEASE (116–33) HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, PUBLIC BUILDINGS, AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT OF THE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 Printed for the use of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure ( Available online at: https://www.govinfo.gov/committee/house-transportation?path=/ browsecommittee/chamber/house/committee/transportation U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 41–130 PDF WASHINGTON : 2020 VerDate Aug 31 2005 14:50 Sep 14, 2020 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 P:\HEARINGS\116\ED\9-25-2~1\TRANSC~1\41130.TXT JEAN TRANSPC154 with DISTILLER COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE PETER A. DEFAZIO, Oregon, Chair ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, SAM GRAVES, Missouri District of Columbia DON YOUNG, Alaska EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas ERIC A. ‘‘RICK’’ CRAWFORD, Arkansas ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland BOB GIBBS, Ohio RICK LARSEN, Washington DANIEL WEBSTER, Florida GRACE F. NAPOLITANO, California THOMAS MASSIE, Kentucky DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois MARK MEADOWS, North Carolina STEVE COHEN, Tennessee SCOTT PERRY, Pennsylvania ALBIO SIRES, New Jersey RODNEY DAVIS, Illinois JOHN GARAMENDI, California ROB WOODALL, Georgia HENRY C. ‘‘HANK’’ JOHNSON, JR., Georgia JOHN KATKO, New York ANDRE´ CARSON, Indiana BRIAN BABIN, Texas DINA TITUS, Nevada GARRET GRAVES, Louisiana SEAN PATRICK MALONEY, New York DAVID ROUZER, North Carolina JARED HUFFMAN, California MIKE BOST, Illinois JULIA BROWNLEY, California RANDY K. WEBER, SR., Texas FREDERICA S. WILSON, Florida DOUG LAMALFA, California DONALD M. PAYNE, JR., New Jersey BRUCE WESTERMAN, Arkansas ALAN S.
    [Show full text]
  • State Delegations
    STATE DELEGATIONS Number before names designates Congressional district. Senate Republicans in roman; Senate Democrats in italic; Senate Independents in SMALL CAPS; House Democrats in roman; House Republicans in italic; House Libertarians in SMALL CAPS; Resident Commissioner and Delegates in boldface. ALABAMA SENATORS 3. Mike Rogers Richard C. Shelby 4. Robert B. Aderholt Doug Jones 5. Mo Brooks REPRESENTATIVES 6. Gary J. Palmer [Democrat 1, Republicans 6] 7. Terri A. Sewell 1. Bradley Byrne 2. Martha Roby ALASKA SENATORS REPRESENTATIVE Lisa Murkowski [Republican 1] Dan Sullivan At Large – Don Young ARIZONA SENATORS 3. Rau´l M. Grijalva Kyrsten Sinema 4. Paul A. Gosar Martha McSally 5. Andy Biggs REPRESENTATIVES 6. David Schweikert [Democrats 5, Republicans 4] 7. Ruben Gallego 1. Tom O’Halleran 8. Debbie Lesko 2. Ann Kirkpatrick 9. Greg Stanton ARKANSAS SENATORS REPRESENTATIVES John Boozman [Republicans 4] Tom Cotton 1. Eric A. ‘‘Rick’’ Crawford 2. J. French Hill 3. Steve Womack 4. Bruce Westerman CALIFORNIA SENATORS 1. Doug LaMalfa Dianne Feinstein 2. Jared Huffman Kamala D. Harris 3. John Garamendi 4. Tom McClintock REPRESENTATIVES 5. Mike Thompson [Democrats 45, Republicans 7, 6. Doris O. Matsui Vacant 1] 7. Ami Bera 309 310 Congressional Directory 8. Paul Cook 31. Pete Aguilar 9. Jerry McNerney 32. Grace F. Napolitano 10. Josh Harder 33. Ted Lieu 11. Mark DeSaulnier 34. Jimmy Gomez 12. Nancy Pelosi 35. Norma J. Torres 13. Barbara Lee 36. Raul Ruiz 14. Jackie Speier 37. Karen Bass 15. Eric Swalwell 38. Linda T. Sa´nchez 16. Jim Costa 39. Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr. 17. Ro Khanna 40. Lucille Roybal-Allard 18.
    [Show full text]
  • May 28, 2020 the Honorable Adam Smith the Honorable Mac
    May 28, 2020 The Honorable Adam Smith The Honorable Mac Thornberry Chairman Ranking Member House Armed Services Committee House Armed Services Committee Washington, D.C. 20515 Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Chairman Smith and Ranking Member Thornberry: As the Fiscal Year 2021 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) discussions begin, we write in support of language to prohibit the planned downsizing of military hospitals and clinics. The restructuring of Military Treatment Facilities (MTF) was included in the FY17 NDAA and medical billet cuts were proposed in the FY21 Department of Defense (DoD) budget. These cuts were based on military medical end strength requirements conducted before the coronavirus emergency. The COVID-19 pandemic demands that medical readiness requirements be reassessed and updated with lessons learned based on our nation’s response to the coronavirus emergency. And, we believe one of the lessons learned is that there will be future public health emergencies that strain the civilian system and we have an obligation to adequately provide for MTF’s and medical billets within the Department of Defense. Even before the COVID-19 emergency, we had concerns about downsizing the MTFs. Specifically, our constituents raised concerns about how the civilian community will absorb new patients with TRICARE. As the NDAA requires, the Defense Health Agency needs to complete a review on how proposed reductions in care facilities will affect beneficiaries. This review should be completed before there is a reduction in medical billets or reduction in MTFs. The civilian medical system is strained to capacity and is being augmented with Department of Defense (DoD) medical personnel.
    [Show full text]