DOCSLIB.ORG

Single Photon Interferometry and Quantum Astrophysics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Single Photon Interferometry and Quantum Astrophysics Single Photon Interferometry and Quantum Astrophysics by Genady Pilyavsky A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved November 2018 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Philip Mauskopf, Chair Christopher Groppi Nathaniel Butler Judd Bowman Paul Scowen ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY December 2018 ABSTRACT This thesis contains an overview, as well as the history of optical interferometers. A new approach to interferometric measurements of stars is proposed and explored. Modern updates to the classic techniques are described along with some theoreti- cal derivations showing why the method of single photon counting shows significant promise relative to the currently used amplitude interferometry. Description of a modular intensity interferometer system using commercially avail- able single-photon detectors is given. Calculations on the sensitivity and uv-plane coverage using these modules mounted on existing telescopes on Kitt Peak, Arizona is presented. Determining fundamental stellar properties is essential for testing models of stellar evolution as well as for deriving physical properties of transiting exoplanets. The proposed method shows great promise in measuring the angular size of stars. Simulations indicate that it is possible to measure stellar diameters of bright stars with AB magnitude ≤6 with a precision of ≥5% in a single night of observation. Additionally, a description is given of a custom time-to-digital converter designed to time tag individual photons from multiple single-photon detectors with high count rate, continuous data logging, and low systematics. The instrument utilizes a tapped- delay line approach on an FPGA chip which allows for sub-clock resolution of <100 ps. The TDC is implemented on a Re-configurable Open Architecture Computing Hardware Revision 2 (ROACH2) board which allows for continuous data streaming and time tagging of up to 20 million events per second. The functioning proto- type is currently set-up to work with up to ten independent channels. Laboratory characterization of the system, including RF, pick up and mitigation, as well as mea- surement of in-lab photon correlations from an incoherent light source (artificial star), are presented. Additional improvements to the TDC will also be discussed, such as improving the data transfer rate by a factor of 10 via an SDP+ Mezzanine card and i PCIe 2SFP+ 10 Gb card, as well as scaling to 64 independent channels. Furthermore, a modified nulling interferometer with image inversion is proposed, for direct imaging of exoplanets below the canonical Rayleigh resolution limit. Image inversion interferometry relies on splitting incoming radiation from a source, either spatially rotating or reflecting the electric field from one arm of the interferometer before recombining the signals and detecting the resulting images in the two output ports with an array of high-speed single-photon detectors. Sources of incoming radia- tion that have cylindrical symmetry and are centered on the rotation axis will cancel in one of the output ports and add in the other output port. The ability to suppress light from a host star, as well as the ability to resolve past the Rayleigh limit, enables sensitive detection of exoplanets from a stable environment without the need for a coronagraph. The expected number of photons and the corresponding variance in the measurement for different initial contrast ratios are shown, with some first-order theoretical instrumental errors. Lastly, preliminary results from a sizeable photometric survey are presented. This survey is used to derive bolometric flux alongside from angular size measurements and the effective stellar temperatures. ii Acknowledgment I like to think of this section as an extended author list, as multiple people through- out my life have contributed in one way or another, to the completion of this thesis. For the sake of organization, and in order to minimize the unavoidable omission of individuals, I will attempt to go in the quasi-chronological order. None of this would have been possible without the love, support and encourage- ment from my family. I am grateful for bedtime stories of aliens and stars that first sparked my interest in the cosmos. Your persistent emphasis on education had led me on this path. By design or by accident, you have shaped me into the person that I am, a perfect being and one of the most humble, modest individuals on this Earth. Post-undergraduate work and mentorship under Stephen Kane and Gerard T. van Belle convinced me to not only pursue a Ph.D. but that I may succeed. Thank you, Natalie Hinkel, for becoming my big sister, encouraging me to attend Arizona State University, and guiding me along the way. Caleb Wheeler, you have tough me plenty of valuable lessons, including the importance of putting things back, and putting things in boxes. Thanks go out to my committee members, Judd Bowman, Nathaniel Butler, Paul Scowen, Christopher Groppi, and my advisor Philip Mauskopf. Judd, thank you for putting up with me rambling incoherently about ad-hoc ideas and Nat for proposing though provoking questions that would change my perception of the physics behind this thesis. Paul, on numerous occasions, your accessibility has steered me in the right direction and allowed me to carry forth with my project. Chirs, you wisdom assisted me in learning how research functions outside of my tiny dark room laboratory; the beer also helped. Phil, thank you for allowing me to pursue tangential ideas which often lead nowhere. While a product may not exist, the knowledge acquired during iii the journey has become more valuable than success. I would also like to apologize for forcing you to spend ridiculous amounts of time correcting my spelilng and bad the grammer. To the professors with whom I had the pleasure of taking a class, both in the School of Earth and Space Exploration, as well as the School of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering, thank you. I will never be able to adequately convey the joy I experience applying the knowledge shared in the classroom, to real-world problems. Special thanks to Danielle Bliss whose classes and advising dissipated my fear of complex mathematics. Thank you, Sam Gordon. The time spent devising weird ideas with you was pure joy. I am hopeful that in the near future we will finally figure out a way to talk to dolphins and translate dreams to video. Adrian Sinclair, thank you for mentoring me during my stay at ASU. Matthew Underhill, our morning coffee time will be forever cherished. If I had just half of your work ethic, I would have graduated in half the time. Jonathan Hoh, Cassandra Whitton, Edward Buie II, Marko best-DM-ever Neric, Kevin Hubbard, Rick Sarmento and Emily Lunde, our Tuesday Vine outing help to break up the monotony and aided in preserving my sanity. Lastly, thank you Jordyn Fani for putting up with me for the last decade. Your love, support, and assurance helped me become a scientist and a well-rounded person. I would not have been able to do this without you. This work has been funded by the NSF (Grant No. 1616906). iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES . ix LIST OF FIGURES . x CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION . 1 1.1 Motivations . 1 1.2 Resolution, Coherence, and Interference . 4 1.2.1 Spatial Resolution . 5 1.2.2 Coherent and incoherent wavefront . 7 1.2.3 Interference of light: classical wave formulation. 9 1.3 Classical Intensity Interferometry . 11 1.4 Modern Amplitude Interferometry . 16 2 INTENSITY INTERFEROMETRY AND SINGLE PHOTON TIMING . 22 2.1 Intensity Interferometry with Photomultiplier Tubes. 22 2.2 Intensity Interferometry with Single Photon Time Tagging . 25 2.3 Choice of Detectors . 28 2.4 Higher Order Correlation and Closure Phase . 31 2.5 Scalability of the telescope array . 33 2.6 UV -plane Exploration Due to Earths Rotation. 34 3 PHOTON STATISTICS . 37 3.1 Quantum of photon bunching . 38 3.2 Photon Occupation Number and Coherence Time . 41 3.3 Signal to Noise Ratio of Coherent, and False Positive Photons . 42 3.4 Signal to noise from stellar magnitude . 45 3.4.1 From Bessel calibration . 45 v CHAPTER Page 3.4.2 Comparing and Converting ηocc to Bessell Calibration for SNR Calculation . 46 3.5 Signal to Noise Ratio in Higher Order Correlations . 50 4 FROM THE STARS TO DATA . 52 4.1 Viable Targets From the Kitt Peak Observatory. 53 4.2 UV -plane Coverage from Kitt Peak . 57 4.3 Time bin shift . 63 4.4 Synchronization of the Decoupled Telescopes. 64 4.5 Optimal Telescope Size and the Affects of Seeing . 66 4.6 Telescope to SPAD coupling . 67 4.7 Readout Electronics. 69 5 READOUT ELECTRONICS AND DATA ANALYSIS . 73 5.1 Background . 73 5.2 Hardware . 74 5.2.1 ROACH2 FPGA Board . 74 5.2.2 LVTTL to LVDS Z-Dok Board . 75 5.3 Firmware . 77 5.3.1 Input filter . 77 5.3.2 Delay line . 79 5.3.3 Bubble filter . 81 5.3.4 Encoder . 81 5.3.5 Ping Pong Buffer . 83 5.4 Software . 84 5.5 Post-processing . 85 vi CHAPTER Page 6 LABORATORY TESTS . 88 6.1 Timing Precision . 88 6.2 Optical Setup . 90 6.3 RF Pickup and Modulation . 93 6.4 Hammond Box and RF Shielding . 96 6.5 Additional Peaks and Troughs . 98 7 IMAGE INVERSION SINGLE PHOTON INTERFEROMETRY FOR EXOPLANET CHARACTERIZATION . 100 7.1 General Overview . 100 7.2 Background . 102 7.2.1 Current Imaging Techniques . 103 7.2.2 Sub-Rayleigh resolution . 104 7.3 Semiclassical Explanation . 106 7.3.1 Theoretical limit and total cancellation of the host star light 106 7.3.2 Coherence time and single photon detection . 108 7.3.3 Associated Errors .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mathématiques Et Espace
    Atelier disciplinaire AD 5 Mathématiques et Espace Anne-Cécile DHERS, Education Nationale (mathématiques) Peggy THILLET, Education Nationale (mathématiques) Yann BARSAMIAN, Education Nationale (mathématiques) Olivier BONNETON, Sciences - U (mathématiques) Cahier d'activités Activité 1 : L'HORIZON TERRESTRE ET SPATIAL Activité 2 : DENOMBREMENT D'ETOILES DANS LE CIEL ET L'UNIVERS Activité 3 : D'HIPPARCOS A BENFORD Activité 4 : OBSERVATION STATISTIQUE DES CRATERES LUNAIRES Activité 5 : DIAMETRE DES CRATERES D'IMPACT Activité 6 : LOI DE TITIUS-BODE Activité 7 : MODELISER UNE CONSTELLATION EN 3D Crédits photo : NASA / CNES L'HORIZON TERRESTRE ET SPATIAL (3 ème / 2 nde ) __________________________________________________ OBJECTIF : Détermination de la ligne d'horizon à une altitude donnée. COMPETENCES : ● Utilisation du théorème de Pythagore ● Utilisation de Google Earth pour évaluer des distances à vol d'oiseau ● Recherche personnelle de données REALISATION : Il s'agit ici de mettre en application le théorème de Pythagore mais avec une vision terrestre dans un premier temps suite à un questionnement de l'élève puis dans un second temps de réutiliser la même démarche dans le cadre spatial de la visibilité d'un satellite. Fiche élève ____________________________________________________________________________ 1. Victor Hugo a écrit dans Les Châtiments : "Les horizons aux horizons succèdent […] : on avance toujours, on n’arrive jamais ". Face à la mer, vous voyez l'horizon à perte de vue. Mais "est-ce loin, l'horizon ?". D'après toi, jusqu'à quelle distance peux-tu voir si le temps est clair ? Réponse 1 : " Sans instrument, je peux voir jusqu'à .................. km " Réponse 2 : " Avec une paire de jumelles, je peux voir jusqu'à ............... km " 2. Nous allons maintenant calculer à l'aide du théorème de Pythagore la ligne d'horizon pour une hauteur H donnée.
    [Show full text]
  • Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants As Tracers of Planet Formation
    Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants as Tracers of Planet Formation Thesis by Marta Levesque Bryan In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 2018 Defended May 1, 2018 ii © 2018 Marta Levesque Bryan ORCID: [0000-0002-6076-5967] All rights reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank Heather Knutson, who I had the great privilege of working with as my thesis advisor. Her encouragement, guidance, and perspective helped me navigate many a challenging problem, and my conversations with her were a consistent source of positivity and learning throughout my time at Caltech. I leave graduate school a better scientist and person for having her as a role model. Heather fostered a wonderfully positive and supportive environment for her students, giving us the space to explore and grow - I could not have asked for a better advisor or research experience. I would also like to thank Konstantin Batygin for enthusiastic and illuminating discussions that always left me more excited to explore the result at hand. Thank you as well to Dimitri Mawet for providing both expertise and contagious optimism for some of my latest direct imaging endeavors. Thank you to the rest of my thesis committee, namely Geoff Blake, Evan Kirby, and Chuck Steidel for their support, helpful conversations, and insightful questions. I am grateful to have had the opportunity to collaborate with Brendan Bowler. His talk at Caltech my second year of graduate school introduced me to an unexpected population of massive wide-separation planetary-mass companions, and lead to a long-running collaboration from which several of my thesis projects were born.
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2105.11583V2 [Astro-Ph.EP] 2 Jul 2021 Keck-HIRES, APF-Levy, and Lick-Hamilton Spectrographs
    Draft version July 6, 2021 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 The California Legacy Survey I. A Catalog of 178 Planets from Precision Radial Velocity Monitoring of 719 Nearby Stars over Three Decades Lee J. Rosenthal,1 Benjamin J. Fulton,1, 2 Lea A. Hirsch,3 Howard T. Isaacson,4 Andrew W. Howard,1 Cayla M. Dedrick,5, 6 Ilya A. Sherstyuk,1 Sarah C. Blunt,1, 7 Erik A. Petigura,8 Heather A. Knutson,9 Aida Behmard,9, 7 Ashley Chontos,10, 7 Justin R. Crepp,11 Ian J. M. Crossfield,12 Paul A. Dalba,13, 14 Debra A. Fischer,15 Gregory W. Henry,16 Stephen R. Kane,13 Molly Kosiarek,17, 7 Geoffrey W. Marcy,1, 7 Ryan A. Rubenzahl,1, 7 Lauren M. Weiss,10 and Jason T. Wright18, 19, 20 1Cahill Center for Astronomy & Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 2IPAC-NASA Exoplanet Science Institute, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 3Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 4Department of Astronomy, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 5Cahill Center for Astronomy & Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 6Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, The Pennsylvania State University, 525 Davey Lab, University Park, PA 16802, USA 7NSF Graduate Research Fellow 8Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA 9Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 10Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawai`i,
    [Show full text]
  • September 2020 BRAS Newsletter
    A Neowise Comet 2020, photo by Ralf Rohner of Skypointer Photography Monthly Meeting September 14th at 7:00 PM, via Jitsi (Monthly meetings are on 2nd Mondays at Highland Road Park Observatory, temporarily during quarantine at meet.jit.si/BRASMeets). GUEST SPEAKER: NASA Michoud Assembly Facility Director, Robert Champion What's In This Issue? President’s Message Secretary's Summary Business Meeting Minutes Outreach Report Asteroid and Comet News Light Pollution Committee Report Globe at Night Member’s Corner –My Quest For A Dark Place, by Chris Carlton Astro-Photos by BRAS Members Messages from the HRPO REMOTE DISCUSSION Solar Viewing Plus Night Mercurian Elongation Spooky Sensation Great Martian Opposition Observing Notes: Aquila – The Eagle Like this newsletter? See PAST ISSUES online back to 2009 Visit us on Facebook – Baton Rouge Astronomical Society Baton Rouge Astronomical Society Newsletter, Night Visions Page 2 of 27 September 2020 President’s Message Welcome to September. You may have noticed that this newsletter is showing up a little bit later than usual, and it’s for good reason: release of the newsletter will now happen after the monthly business meeting so that we can have a chance to keep everybody up to date on the latest information. Sometimes, this will mean the newsletter shows up a couple of days late. But, the upshot is that you’ll now be able to see what we discussed at the recent business meeting and have time to digest it before our general meeting in case you want to give some feedback. Now that we’re on the new format, business meetings (and the oft neglected Light Pollution Committee Meeting), are going to start being open to all members of the club again by simply joining up in the respective chat rooms the Wednesday before the first Monday of the month—which I encourage people to do, especially if you have some ideas you want to see the club put into action.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brightest Stars Seite 1 Von 9
    The Brightest Stars Seite 1 von 9 The Brightest Stars This is a list of the 300 brightest stars made using data from the Hipparcos catalogue. The stellar distances are only fairly accurate for stars well within 1000 light years. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 No. Star Names Equatorial Galactic Spectral Vis Abs Prllx Err Dist Coordinates Coordinates Type Mag Mag ly RA Dec l° b° 1. Alpha Canis Majoris Sirius 06 45 -16.7 227.2 -8.9 A1V -1.44 1.45 379.21 1.58 9 2. Alpha Carinae Canopus 06 24 -52.7 261.2 -25.3 F0Ib -0.62 -5.53 10.43 0.53 310 3. Alpha Centauri Rigil Kentaurus 14 40 -60.8 315.8 -0.7 G2V+K1V -0.27 4.08 742.12 1.40 4 4. Alpha Boötis Arcturus 14 16 +19.2 15.2 +69.0 K2III -0.05 -0.31 88.85 0.74 37 5. Alpha Lyrae Vega 18 37 +38.8 67.5 +19.2 A0V 0.03 0.58 128.93 0.55 25 6. Alpha Aurigae Capella 05 17 +46.0 162.6 +4.6 G5III+G0III 0.08 -0.48 77.29 0.89 42 7. Beta Orionis Rigel 05 15 -8.2 209.3 -25.1 B8Ia 0.18 -6.69 4.22 0.81 770 8. Alpha Canis Minoris Procyon 07 39 +5.2 213.7 +13.0 F5IV-V 0.40 2.68 285.93 0.88 11 9. Alpha Eridani Achernar 01 38 -57.2 290.7 -58.8 B3V 0.45 -2.77 22.68 0.57 144 10.
    [Show full text]
  • IAU Division C Working Group on Star Names 2019 Annual Report
    IAU Division C Working Group on Star Names 2019 Annual Report Eric Mamajek (chair, USA) WG Members: Juan Antonio Belmote Avilés (Spain), Sze-leung Cheung (Thailand), Beatriz García (Argentina), Steven Gullberg (USA), Duane Hamacher (Australia), Susanne M. Hoffmann (Germany), Alejandro López (Argentina), Javier Mejuto (Honduras), Thierry Montmerle (France), Jay Pasachoff (USA), Ian Ridpath (UK), Clive Ruggles (UK), B.S. Shylaja (India), Robert van Gent (Netherlands), Hitoshi Yamaoka (Japan) WG Associates: Danielle Adams (USA), Yunli Shi (China), Doris Vickers (Austria) WGSN Website: https://www.iau.org/science/scientific_bodies/working_groups/280/ ​ WGSN Email: [email protected] ​ The Working Group on Star Names (WGSN) consists of an international group of astronomers with expertise in stellar astronomy, astronomical history, and cultural astronomy who research and catalog proper names for stars for use by the international astronomical community, and also to aid the recognition and preservation of intangible astronomical heritage. The Terms of Reference and membership for WG Star Names (WGSN) are provided at the IAU website: https://www.iau.org/science/scientific_bodies/working_groups/280/. ​ ​ ​ WGSN was re-proposed to Division C and was approved in April 2019 as a functional WG whose scope extends beyond the normal 3-year cycle of IAU working groups. The WGSN was specifically called out on p. 22 of IAU Strategic Plan 2020-2030: “The IAU serves as the ​ internationally recognised authority for assigning designations to celestial bodies and their surface features. To do so, the IAU has a number of Working Groups on various topics, most notably on the nomenclature of small bodies in the Solar System and planetary systems under Division F and on Star Names under Division C.” WGSN continues its long term activity of researching cultural astronomy literature for star names, and researching etymologies with the goal of adding this information to the WGSN’s online materials.
    [Show full text]
  • • August the 26Th 2004 Detection of the Radial-Velocity Signal Induced by OGLE-TR-111 B Using UVES/FLAMES on the VLT (See Pont Et Al
    2004 • August the 26th 2004 Detection of the radial-velocity signal induced by OGLE-TR-111 b using UVES/FLAMES on the VLT (see Pont et al. 2004, A&A in press, astro-ph/0408499). • August the 25th 2004 TrES-1b: A new transiting exoplanet detected by the Trans-Atlantic Exoplanet Survey (TreS) team . (see Boulder Press release or Alonso et al.) • August the 25th 2004 HD 160691 c : A 14 Earth-mass planet detected with HARPS (see ESO Press Release or Santos et al.) • July the 8th 2004 HD 37605 b: The first extra-solar planet detected with HRS on the Hobby- Eberly Telescope (Cochran et al.) • May the 3rd 2004 HD 219452 Bb withdrawn by Desidera et al. • April the 28th 2004 Orbital solution for OGLE-TR-113 confirmed by Konacki et al • April the 15th 2004 OGLE 2003-BLG-235/MOA 2003-BLG-53: a planetary microlensing event (Bond et al.) • April the 14th 2004 FLAMES-UVES spectroscopic orbits for two OGLE III transiting candidates: OGLE-TR-113 and OGLE-TR-132 (Bouchy et al.) • February 2004 Detection of Carbon and Oxygen in the evaporating atmosphere of HD 209458 b by A. Vidal-Madjar et al. (from HST observations). • January the 5th 2004 Two planets orbiting giant stars announced by Mitchell et al. during the AAS meeting: HD 59686 b and 91 Aqr b (HD 219499 b). Two other more massive companions, Tau Gem b (HD 54719 b) and nu Oph b (HD 163917 b), have also been announced by the same authors. 2003 • December 2003 First planet detected with HARPS: HD 330075 b (see Mayor et al., in the ESO Messenger No 114) • July the 3rd 2003 A long-period planet on a circular orbit around HD 70642 announced by the AAT team (Carter et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetarium Handbook
    Portable Planetarium Handbook Susan Reynolds Button, Editor July 2002 Table of Contents Section I. Table of Contents .................................................................................... 1 Section II. Introduction ............................................................................................. 1 Section III. Contributors............................................................................................. 1 Section IV. Practical Applications of Portable Planetariums...................................1 A. Introduction: “Why are Portable Planetariums so Special?” .......................2 1. “Twenty Years on the Road: The Portable Planetarium’s Development and Contributions to the Teaching of Astronomy” ......................................................................................3 2. “Outreach: The Long Arm of STARLAB”.......................................18 3. “Professionalism and Survival Tactics” ..........................................20 B. Outreach with a Planetarium Specialist ....................................................22 1. “Reach Out and Teach Someone” ................................................ 23 2. “Student Intern/Mentor Program Proposal”................................... 26 3. “Student-Directed Planetarium Lessons and Other Creative Uses For STARLAB”..................................................................... 27 C. Outreach-Lending/Rental Programs and Teacher Training ..................... 30 1. “Unmanned Satellite” ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Star-Planet Interactions
    Star-Planet Interactions A. F. Lanza1 1INAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Catania, Via S. Sofia, 78 – 95123 Catania, Italy Abstract. Stars interact with their planets through gravitation, radiation, and magnetic fields. I shall focus on the interactions between late-type stars with an outer convection zone and close-in planets, i.e., with an orbital semimajor axis smaller than 0.15 AU. I shall review the roles of tides and magnetic fields considering some key observations≈ and discussing theoretical scenarios for their interpretation with an emphasis on open questions. 1. Introduction Stars interact with their planets through gravitation, radiation, and magnetic fields. I shall focus on the case of main-sequence late-type stars and close-in planets (orbit semimajor axis a < 0.15 AU) and limit myself to a few examples. Therefore, I apologize for missing important topics∼ in this field some of which have been covered in the contributions by Jardine, Holtzwarth, Grissmeier, Jeffers, and others at this Conference. The space telescopes CoRoT (Auvergne et al. 2009) and Kepler (Borucki et al. 2010) have opened a new era in the detection of extrasolar planets and the study of their interactions with their host stars because they allow us, among others, to measure stellar rotation in late-type stars through the light modulation induced by photospheric brightness inhomogeneities (e.g., Affer et al. 2012; McQuillan et al. 2014; Lanza et al. 2014). Moreover, the same flux modulation can be used to derive information on the active longitudes where starspots preferentially form and evolve (e.g., Lanza et al. 2009a; Bonomo & Lanza 2012)1.
    [Show full text]
  • Hot Jupiters and Stellar Magnetic Activity
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. 09753 c ESO 2018 October 31, 2018 Hot Jupiters and stellar magnetic activity A. F. Lanza INAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Catania, Via S. Sofia, 78 – 95123 Catania, Italy e-mail: [email protected] Received ... ; accepted ... ABSTRACT Context. Recent observations suggest that stellar magnetic activity may be influenced by the presence of a close-by giant planet. Specifically, chromospheric hot spots rotating in phase with the planet orbital motion have been observed during some seasons in a few stars harbouring hot Jupiters. The spot leads the subplanetary point by a typical amount of 60◦ 70◦, with the extreme case of υ And where the angle is 170◦. ∼ − ∼ Aims. The interaction between the star and the planet is described considering the reconnection between the stellar coronal field and the magnetic field of the planet. Reconnection events produce energetic particles that moving along magnetic field lines impact onto the stellar chromosphere giving rise to a localized hot spot. Methods. A simple magnetohydrostatic model is introduced to describe the coronal magnetic field of the star connecting its surface to the orbiting planet. The field is assumed to be axisymmetric around the rotation axis of the star and its configuration is more general than a linear force-free field. Results. With a suitable choice of the free parameters, the model can explain the phase differences between the hot spots and the planets observed in HD 179949, υ And, HD 189733, and τ Bootis, as well as their visibility modulation on the orbital period and seasonal time scales. The possible presence of cool spots associated with the planets in τ Boo and HD 192263 cannot be explained by the present model.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the True Mass of Radial-Velocity Exoplanets with Gaia 9 Planet Candidates in the Brown-Dwarf/Stellar Regime and 27 Confirmed Planets
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. exoplanet_mass_gaia c ESO 2020 September 30, 2020 Determining the true mass of radial-velocity exoplanets with Gaia 9 planet candidates in the brown-dwarf/stellar regime and 27 confirmed planets F. Kiefer1; 2, G. Hébrard1; 3, A. Lecavelier des Etangs1, E. Martioli1; 4, S. Dalal1, and A. Vidal-Madjar1 1 Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, UMR 7095, 98 bis bd Arago, 75014 Paris, France 2 LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, Université PSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon, France? 3 Observatoire de Haute-Provence, CNRS, Universiteé d’Aix-Marseille, 04870 Saint-Michel-l’Observatoire, France 4 Laboratório Nacional de Astrofísica, Rua Estados Unidos 154, 37504-364, Itajubá - MG, Brazil Submitted on 2020/08/20 ; Accepted for publication on 2020/09/24 ABSTRACT Mass is one of the most important parameters for determining the true nature of an astronomical object. Yet, many published exoplan- ets lack a measurement of their true mass, in particular those detected thanks to radial velocity (RV) variations of their host star. For those, only the minimum mass, or m sin i, is known, owing to the insensitivity of RVs to the inclination of the detected orbit compared to the plane-of-the-sky. The mass that is given in database is generally that of an assumed edge-on system (∼90◦), but many other inclinations are possible, even extreme values closer to 0◦ (face-on). In such case, the mass of the published object could be strongly underestimated by up to two orders of magnitude.
    [Show full text]