DOCSLIB.ORG

© in This Web Service Cambridge University

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
© in This Web Service Cambridge University Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-12422-5 - The Origins of the Greek Architectural Orders Barbara A. Barletta Index More information INDEX adyton, 77, 79 Temple of Hera,mentioned by Vitruvius, 4–5, Aeolic leaf drum, 100, 110, 144 128, 154 Aeolic volute capital, 98–101, 144 ashlar masonry,27,37, 125 Aigina Asine, 25, 27 Altar of Aphaia (Older Temple), 70 Assos, Temple of Athena, 117 Sphinx Column, 97, 98, 101, 104 astragal (on Ionic column shaft or base), 84, 90, Temple of Aphaia (Older), 58, 62, 64, 69, 70, 95, 97 74, 79, 82, 83, 131, 148, 150 Athenian style column capital, 110–11 Temple of Apollo I, 58, 62, 66, 69, 70, 74, 83, Athens, 3, 14, 19, 110, 155 150 Hekatompedon on Akropolis, 75, 82, 83 votive capital (Mus. Inv. 2375), 54, 58, 60, 62, Attic column base, 2, 5, 95, 123–24 83 Akragas (Agrigento) Bathykles of Magnesia, 81 Doric capital, 60 Billot, M.-F.,35 Temple of Zeus Olympios,143 Brockmann, A. D., 63, 112, 113 temples, 19 building models (architectural models), 35, 40–46, Alberti, L. B., 11, 12, 19 52, 153 Alkamenes, 13 Buschor, E., 118 altars, 111–112, 141 Alty,J., 20 Callimachus, 2 Amyklai, Throne of Apollo, 81 Carpenter, R., 9 Andrae, W.,142 Catling, R.W.V.,42–44 Andros, Zagora, 41 Caylus, comte de, 13 annulets, 60–62 Champollion, J. F., 18 Ano Mazaraki (Achaia), 33 Chersiphron, 9 Temple of Artemis, 33–34, 39, 47 Chian base, 95, 123–24 anta (wall-end), 42, 47,48 Chios, 47, 113, 124 Doric, 24, 63, 64, 65, 66, 80, 126, 154 Choisy,A., 17 Ionic, 24, 111 Cicero, 13 anta building, 30, 40, 52 Coldstream, J. N., 81 anta capital Corinth, 3, 62, 67, 80, 82, 154 Doric, 44, 64, 79, 82, 114, 154 Temple of Apollo (seventh century), 27, 28, 38, Ionic, 46, 111–15, 123, 124, 155 48, 146, 153 sofa-type (proto-Ionic), 64–66, 79, 80, 81, Corinthia, 48, 71, 146, 147 154–55 Corinthian capital, 9 Apelles, 12, 13, 14 Corinthian column, 143 Arcesius, 9 Corinthian order, 1, 2, 152, 155 Argos, sanctuary of Hera (Argive Heraion), 2, 4 Coulton, J. J., 58, 60, 80, 141 building model, 35, 40, 42 Crete, 27, 29, 47 Capital C, 54–58, 60, 62, 83 Dreros, Temple of Apollo, 47 capitals, 62 Karphi, 27 Old Temple of Hera (seventh century), 34–35, Prinias, Temple B, 27 39, 128, 131 Smari, 27 217 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-12422-5 - The Origins of the Greek Architectural Orders Barbara A. Barletta Index More information I N D E X Cyrene Sphinx Column, 105 Eretria, 29 Bay Hut, 25 Delos, 145 Temple of Apollo (Hekatompedon), 36 Archegesion, 85 ethnos, 23, 81, 150 column and pillar capitals, 101, 134 Hexagonal Monument, 119 Fergusson, J., 18 leaf capital, 106 flutes on columns, 62–63, 98, 104, 138, 141, 151 Oikos of the Naxians, 85, 87, 90, 95, 98, 101, arris(es), 63, 84, 98, 123 104, 115, 117–18, 120, 121, 136, 147 fillets, 84, 98, 123 Sphinx Column, 99–100, 101, 105 Foce del Sele Temple of Hera,Mt. Kynthos, 35 Temple of Hera I (“Treasury”), 69, 83 Delphi, 4 Temple of Hera (II), 75 Athenian Stoa, 95 Fraisse, P.,119 Ionic treasuries, architraves of, 115–117 Monopteros (from Sikyonian treasury), 70, 83, geison revetment, 74, 148 126, 129, 148 geison tile, 71–72, 79 Naxian Sphinx Column, 85, 97–100, 101, 105, Gela (Sicily), 114 106 Gros, P., 4, 9 Old Tholos, 58, 62, 69, 70, 74, 82, 83, 129–30, Gruben, G., 101, 103, 106–107, 108–109, 110, 148, 150 114, 115–117, 118, 119, 133–134, 136, 147 Temple of Apollo, 81 guttae, 2, 24, 49, 71, 72, 74–75, 82, 131–133, Temple of Athena Pronaia, 39, 54, 58, 60–62, 148–150 83, 126, 129 Hahland, W., 111 Treasury of Klazomenai, 118 Hall, J. M., 20 Treasury of Knidos (Knidian treasury), 115, Hampe, R., 139 118, 136 Harrison, E. B., 3 Treasury of Massalia, 114, 118 Hellmann, M. C., 119 Treasury of Siphnos, 114, 118 Hermogenes, 9, 17 Demangel, R., 129 Herodotos (Herodotus), 3, 81, 108 dentils, 2, 6, 7, 10, 24, 46, 52, 119, 123, 130, 136, Hersey,G., 138 137, 143, 145, 154 Hittorff, J.-I., 17, 130 Didyma Höcker, C., 152 altar capitals, 113 Hodge, A. T., 71 column capital(s), 107, 134 Hoffelner, K., 58, 69 Temple of Apollo, 98, 115, 119, 120, 121, 136 Hölbl, G., 138, 141 Dinsmoor, W.B., 19, 126 Holland, L. B., 133 Dionysius of Halicarnassus, 15 Hübsch, H., 17 Donohue, A. A., 7 hut(s), 7, 14, 17,18 doors, Ionic, 136 Dorians, 3, 4, 19, 143, 155 Iasos, 118 Doros, 2–3, 4 Ion, 2 Drerup, H., 35, 151 Ionians, 3, 5, 19, 143, 155 Dörpfeld, W., 127 Ionic leaf capital, 100, 106, 108, 110, 144 Durm, J., 18 Isthmia, Temple of Poseidon (seventh century), 27–28, 36–38, 49–51, 68, 71–74, 125, 146, Eckhart, L., 129 153 Egypt, 18, 65, 138, 141, 151 Elis, terracotta triglyph, 69 Kalapodi Ephesian base, 91, 123–24 column capitals, 62, 138 Ephesos North Temple, 72, 83, 126, 127 Temple of Artemis (eighth century), 5, 28, 33, South Temple, 72, 83, 126, 127, 146 46, 52 Kallipolis (Aitolia), 38 Temple of Artemis (sixth century), 3, 5, 9, 84, Kalydon, 68 87, 90, 91, 98, 107, 112, 115, 118, 119, 120, Temple A, 72–74, 83 121, 124, 154 Temple B 1, 71–72, 83 218 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-12422-5 - The Origins of the Greek Architectural Orders Barbara A. Barletta Index More information I N D E X Karaköy,119 Naukratis, 151 Keos, temple at Koressia, 114–115 Temple of Apollo, 87, 108, 110 Kienast, H., 36, 111, 112, 113 Naxos, 98, 100, 154 (see also Delos, Oikos of the Kirchhoff, W.,101, 106, 144 Naxians and Delphi, Naxian Sphinx Klaros, Temple of Apollo, 4 Column) Klein, N. L., 51, 68, 71, 72 Sangri, Temple of Demeter and Kore, 90, 109, Klenze, L. von, 133 114, 118, 124 Kleomenes, 80 Sangri, votive column, 101, 103–4, 123, Korkyra 133–34, 145 Altar of Artemis, 70, 148 Temple of Apollo, 109 decorated column capitals, 62, 138–39 Yria, 90 frieze members, 70 Yria, Temple of Dionysos II, 121 Kardaki temple, 71, 150 Yria, Temple of Dionysos III, 47, 86, 120 Temple of Artemis, 58, 63, 64, 69, 70, 74, Yria, Temple of Dionysos IV,86, 97, 98, 101, 77–79, 82, 83, 131, 138, 150 105, 118, 120, 123 Temple of Hera (Mon Repos),58, 69, 71–72, 83 Nemea, Temple of Zeus (early sixth century), 38, Xenvares column, 60–62, 83, 138 74 Kroton, geison revetment, 148 Nenna, M. D., 126 Kyzikos, 119 Nichoria (Messenia), 25, 27 La Coste-Messelière, P.de, 55 Ohnesorg, A., 101, 105, 134 Larisa, 113, 119 Olympia Laroche, D., 126 leaf bands, 62, 139 Laugier, M.-A., 13, 14, 19 Temple of Hera,27, 39, 62, 63–64, 77–79, 80, Lawrence, A. W.,19 83, 126–127, 139 leaf necking, 62, 138 Temple of Zeus (Early Classical),14, 82 leaf ring, 62, 139 terracotta triglyphs, 69 Lefkandi, Heroön, 27, 32, 46, 52, 144, 146 Onians, J., 143 Lesbian leaf base, 91–95 opisthodomos, 30, 77, 126 Lesbos, Antissa, Building III, 47 Østby,E., 39, 70 Lodoli, C., 17 Lokroi, Casa Marafioti temple, 70 Paestum (Poseidonia), 19 Lysippos, 13, 14 “Basilica” (Temple of Hera I), 75, 79, 83, 139 Temple of Athena, 75 Mallwitz, A., 32, 35–37,39 palm capital, 144 Martin, R., 100, 110, 113, 142, 144 Paoli, A., 18 Mazarakis Ainian, A., 23, 32 Paros McGowan, E. P., 111 column capitals, 100, 106 megaron, 21, 23, 30, 31, 52, 141, 145 Temple A, 118 Mertens, D., 126 Pausanias, 7, 126, 145 Metagenes, 9 Payne, H.G.G., 51, 146 Metapontion, 114, 120 pediment, 3, 6, 19, 72, 80 metope(s), 2, 6, 24, 38, 42, 44, 49, 51–52, 54, 66–69, Perachora 75, 79, 80, 126, 127, 131, 141, 147, 148 building models from the Sanctuary of Hera Miletos, 29 Akraia, 40–42 Milizia, F., 17,19 sherds with Doric capitals, 128, 129 mud-brick, 25–27, 29, 32, 34, 42, 43, 52, 63, 80, peristyle, 27, 28, 32–39, 46, 47, 48, 49–50, 51, 125, 126, 133 52–53, 67, 77, 79, 95, 107, 108, 109, 120–21, Müller, K. O., 19 126, 127, 133, 146, 148–50, 151, 153–54 mutule(s), 2, 6, 7, 24, 38, 49, 71, 72, 74, 75, 82, Petrie, W.M.F.,108 130, 131, 143, 145, 146, 148, 150, 154 Pheidias, 13, 14 Mykenai (Mycenae) Philo, 9 temple, 68–69, 72, 83, 126, 146, 148 Pindar, 3 Lion Gate, 145 Piranesi, G. B., 18–19 Myus, Temple of Dionysos, 119 Pithekoussai (Ischia), 29 219 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-12422-5 - The Origins of the Greek Architectural Orders Barbara A. Barletta Index More information I N D E X Plato, 8 Serlio, S., 12 Pliny,3, 5, 7, 8, 13, 14, 15, 84, 123 Silenus, 9 Plutarch, 7 Skamon of Mytilene, 8 polis, 23, 81, 150, 152 Smyrna, Old, 29 Pollitt, J. J., 13 city wall 1, 27 Polykleitos, 8, 12, 13, 14 Temple of Athena,101 Pomtow,H., 126 Sparta, building models, 42–45 Praxiteles, 13, 14 Stucky,R.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Full Thesis Text Only
    A DIACHRONIC EXAMINATION OF THE ERECHTHEION AND ITS RECEPTION Alexandra L. Lesk, B.A., M.St. (Oxon.), M.A. Presented to McMicken College of Arts and Sciences and the Department of Classics of the University of Cincinnati in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2004 Committee: C. Brian Rose (Chair) Jack L. Davis Kathleen M. Lynch J. James Coulton Abstract iii ABSTRACT “A Diachronic Examination of the Erechtheion and Its Reception” examines the social life of the Ionic temple on the Athenian Akropolis, which was built in the late 5th century B.C. to house Athens’ most sacred cults and relics. Using a contextualized diachronic approach, this study examines both the changes to the Erechtheion between its construction and the middle of the 19th century A.D., as well as the impact the temple had on the architecture and art of these successive periods. This approach allows the evidence to shed light on new areas of interest such as the Post-Antique phases of the building, in addition to affording a better understanding of problems that have plagued the study of the Erechtheion during the past two centuries. This study begins with a re-examination of all the pertinent archaeological, epigraphical, and literary evidence, and proposes a wholly new reconstruction of how the Erechtheion worked physically and ritually in ancient times. After accounting for the immediate influence of the Erechtheion on subsequent buildings of the Ionic order, an argument for a Hellenistic rather than Augustan date for the major repairs to the temple is presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Baran, Karian Archit
    I Frank Rumscheid (Hrsg.) · Die Karer und die Anderen II III Die Karer und die Anderen Internationales Kolloquium an der Freien Universität Berlin 13. bis 15. Oktober 2005 Herausgegeben von Frank Rumscheid Verlag Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH · Bonn 2009 IV Umschlag: Männlicher ‘Sphinx’, Akroterion des Androns B in Labraunda (Entwurf S. Biegert auf Grundlage einer Graphik von F. Rumscheid) Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie. Detailliertere bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über <http://dnb.d-nb.de> abrufbar. © 2009 by Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn Redaktion: Frank Rumscheid (Kiel) Satz: Susanne Biegert (Bonn) Druck: Druckhaus Thomas Müntzer, 99947 Bad Langensalza ISBN 978-3-7749-3632-4 V Inhaltsverzeichnis Frank Rumscheid Einführung VII Beziehungen zu den Anderen Michael Meier-Brügger Karer und Alt-Anatolier aus sprachwissenschaftlicher Sicht 1 Wolf-Dietrich Niemeier Milet und Karien vom Neolithikum bis zu den ‘Dunklen Jahrhunderten’. Mythos und Archäologie 7 Alexander Herda Karki™a-Karien und die sogenannte Ionische Migration 27 Alain Bresson Karien und die dorische Kolonisation 109 Winfried Held Die Karer und die Rhodische Peraia 121 Christopher Ratté The Carians and the Lydians 135 Hilmar Klinkott Die Karer im Achaimenidenreich 149 Werner Tietz Karer und Lykier: Politische und kulturelle Beziehungen im 5./4. Jh. v. Chr. 163 Frank Rumscheid Die Leleger: Karer oder Andere? 173 Bernhard Schmaltz Klassische Leitkultur und karische Provinz? Archäologische Zeugnisse im südlichen
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Mouldings of Kos and Rhodes
    GREEK MOULDINGS OF KOS AND RHODES (PLATES 108-109) I. INTRODUCTION JT WAS regrettablethat it had not been possibleto makedrawings of the Dodeca- nesian material to include in the study of the profiles of Greek architectural mouldings published by the American School of Classical Studies at Athens in 1936.' Later opportunity arose 2 to make the drawings, full size with a Maco Template,3but their study was unfortunately delayed.4 The material is presented now as a supple- ment to the original volume. Considerations of printing have, however, made advisable certain changes in form as well as format, but it is hoped that this article may be used with the earlier publication without inconvenience, for the material in the two belongs together. It has not been possible to print all the profiles full size as in the original study, but Figure 1 is retained at full scale. It should be noted, then, in making comparison, that all the other profiles here presented, in Figures 2 through 8, are shown at one-half size. Information and comment regarding each profile, formerly presented in tabular form, is here put into catalogue form. All the same information given previously is included except the proportions. These were published originally as part of the proof of the chronological development noted in each type. Since the general lines of development appear now to have become established, it has not been considered essential to record the proportions. Only two of the Twelve Islands have yielded as yet any considerable Greek archi- tectural remains. Rhodes, with its numerous settlements, was an important seat of 1 L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sanctuary of Despotiko in the Cyclades. Excavations 2001–2012
    https://publications.dainst.org iDAI.publications ELEKTRONISCHE PUBLIKATIONEN DES DEUTSCHEN ARCHÄOLOGISCHEN INSTITUTS Dies ist ein digitaler Sonderdruck des Beitrags / This is a digital offprint of the article Yannos Kourayos – Kornelia Daifa – Aenne Ohnesorg – Katarina Papajanni The Sanctuary of Despotiko in the Cyclades. Excavations 2001–2012 aus / from Archäologischer Anzeiger Ausgabe / Issue 2 • 2012 Seite / Page 93–174 https://publications.dainst.org/journals/aa/123/4812 • urn:nbn:de:0048-journals.aa-2012-2-p93-174-v4812.0 Verantwortliche Redaktion / Publishing editor Redaktion der Zentrale | Deutsches Archäologisches Institut Weitere Informationen unter / For further information see https://publications.dainst.org/journals/aa ISSN der Online-Ausgabe / ISSN of the online edition 2510-4713 Verlag / Publisher Hirmer Verlag GmbH, München ©2017 Deutsches Archäologisches Institut Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Zentrale, Podbielskiallee 69–71, 14195 Berlin, Tel: +49 30 187711-0 Email: [email protected] / Web: dainst.org Nutzungsbedingungen: Mit dem Herunterladen erkennen Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen (https://publications.dainst.org/terms-of-use) von iDAI.publications an. Die Nutzung der Inhalte ist ausschließlich privaten Nutzerinnen / Nutzern für den eigenen wissenschaftlichen und sonstigen privaten Gebrauch gestattet. Sämtliche Texte, Bilder und sonstige Inhalte in diesem Dokument unterliegen dem Schutz des Urheberrechts gemäß dem Urheberrechtsgesetz der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Die Inhalte können von Ihnen nur dann genutzt und vervielfältigt werden, wenn Ihnen dies im Einzelfall durch den Rechteinhaber oder die Schrankenregelungen des Urheberrechts gestattet ist. Jede Art der Nutzung zu gewerblichen Zwecken ist untersagt. Zu den Möglichkeiten einer Lizensierung von Nutzungsrechten wenden Sie sich bitte direkt an die verantwortlichen Herausgeberinnen/Herausgeber der entsprechenden Publikationsorgane oder an die Online-Redaktion des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts ([email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman Arch at Isthmia
    THE ROMAN ARCH AT ISTHMIA (PLATES 77-84) D URING THE ROMAN IMPERIALAGE a monumentaltriple arch was the prin- cipal easterly approach to the Sanctuaryof Poseidon at Isthmia.) This arch was con- structed, probably, in the second half of the 1st century after Christ, and its four piers were built into the Northeast Gate of the Fortress on the Hexamilion shortly after A.D. 400. The arch stood in a prominent position on a ridge overlooking the port of Schoinos, and any visitor who approachedIsthmia from the north or east, either by land or by sea, would have ' This report is a result of excavationsin 1967 and 1969 by the University of California, Los Angeles, on behalf of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens with the generous support of the Samuel H. Kress Foundation, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, Stuart E. M. Thorne, Esq., and the National Endowment for the Humanities. This study is the cumulative result of the work of many individuals over a number of years. Thanks are naturally due to the Greek ArchaeologicalService and to a succession of coop- erative ephors of the Argolid and Corinthia. We wish also to thank Professor Paul A. Clement, Director, Isthmia Excavations (UCLA), for his suggestion that we publish the arch at Isthmia and for his constant support and good advice. William B. Dinsmoor, Jr. was responsible for the correct interpretation of his father's 1909 photographs, the identification of the large anta (12), and the final restoration of the arch (Fig. 3). Charles Peirce executed many of the final drawings and providedmuch assistance along with a fresh view of the material.
    [Show full text]
  • Stylistic Analysis of the Architectural
    計画系 684 号 【カテゴリーⅡ】 日本建築学会計画系論文集 第78巻 第684号，497-507，2013年 2 月 J. Archit. Plann., AIJ, Vol. 78 No. 684, 497-507, Feb., 2013 ������������������������������������������������������ STYLISTIC�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� ANALYSIS OF THE ARCHITECTURAL ORNAMENTATION �������������������������������������������������� 古代都市メッセネのアスクレピオス神域のストアにおける建築装飾の様式分析OF THE STOAS OF THE ASKLEPIEION AT ANCIENT MESSENE 古代都市メッセネのアスクレピオス神域のストアにおける建築装飾の様式分析 古代都市メッセネのアスクレピオス神域のストアにおける建築装飾の様式分析古代都市メッセネのアスクレピオス神域のストアにおける建築装飾の様式分析 �� �� * �� �� * ＊ RyuichiRyuichi�� YOSHITAKE YOSHITAKE �� * Ryuichi吉 武YOSHITAKE 隆 一 The Hellenistic sanctuary of the Asklepios at Messene has a square courtyard surrounded by the Stoas from its four sides. It has been The Hellenistic sanctuary of the Asklepios at Messene has a square courtyard surrounded by the Stoas from its four sides. It has been Theconsidered Hellenistic by that sanctuary the Asklepieion of the Asklepios was built at between Messene the has end a squareof the 3courtyardrd century surroundedand the 2nd����������������������������������������������� by the Stoas from its four sides. It has been considered by that the Asklepieion was built between the end of the 3rd century and the 2nd����������������������������������������������� ���������������������������������������������������������������considered by that the Asklepieion was built between the end of the������������������������������������������������������� 3rd century and the 2nd�����������������������������������������������nd��������������
    [Show full text]
  • Anchoring Two Floating Temples
    ANCHORING TWO FLOATING TEMPLES (PLATES 95 AND 96) ATREASURE TROVE of architecturalmembers was discoveredduring the excava- 17~. tions of 1939 and 1959 at the Athenian Agora, built into the Post-Herulian Wall and tower adjacentto the remains known as the Southeast Temple (Fig. 1).1 Among them is a series comprising marble Doric entablature blocks (A 1, B 1-3, C 1, 2, D 1-8), marble Doric column drums and capitals (E 1-6), one Doric anta capital (F 1), and several related wall blocks (G 1-8). The entablature series consists of an epistyle block, three epistyle backers,eight triglyphs, and two metope fragments, all of which had apparently been re- used together on a structureof the early Roman period.2The re-used column drums and capitals belong to four columns of milky white marble which, because of their scale and finding place, have been associatedwith the same Roman structure.The anta capital has the upper part of the anta shaft carvedon it; this shaft has a width which is the same as the lower diameter of the columns and therefore presumably was employed along with the columns in their second use. Incorporatedinto the wall as well, just beneath two of the epistyle backers, are five wall blocks which were set in a row; these are of the same milky white marble-usedfor the columns and are to be associatedwith them. Other blocks from this series now lie on the ground near by. ' See p. 421 below. I would like to thank Alison Adams most warmly for her interest and help in this study, particularly for the dating of the pottery for which she secured the expertise of Kathleen Slane.
    [Show full text]
  • L.T.-Shoe-Greek-Mouldings-Of-Kos
    GREEK MOULDINGS OF KOS AND RHODES 339 Greek civilization from the Bronze Age on, but little or no architectural material survives from the earlier centuries of Greek building and no mouldings earlier than the 4th century have been discovered. The buildings of Rhodes itself, of Ialysos, Lindos, and Kameiros, as we see them today, date from the 4th, 3rd, and 2nd centuries. On Kos, the earliest preserved architectural monuments are the Charmyleion from the end of the 4th century and the 3rd century buildings in the great Asklepios sanc- tuary, but the bulk of the material from both the Asklepieion and the city is of the 2nd century. That earlier very fine structures once existed, as the history of the island would suggest, is proved by a few unidentifiable but datable fragments found collected in the Castle of the Knights, which serves as a museum and storehouse for antiquities collected on the island. Since both Rhodes and Kos were essentially Dorian settlements, the Doric archi- tectural style was probably regular from early times. Certain it is that temples and other buildings of the 4th century on Rhodes are of the Doric order. Kos, on the other hand, seems always to have been more closely associated with her mainland neighbors and to have used the Ionic style as well as the Doric. There is clear evi- dence for an Ionic building in the late 6th century as well as a tomb of the Ionic order in the late 4th century. By the 2nd century the Doric order had been adopted by Ionian cities and was used interchangeably with the Ionic, and Dorian cities of the mainland had taken up Ionic along with Doric.
    [Show full text]
  • This Pdf of Your Paper in Structure, Image, Ornament: Architectural Sculpture in the Greek World Belongs to the Publishers Oxbow Books and It Is Their Copyright
    This PDF of your paper in Structure, Image, Ornament: Architectural Sculpture in the Greek World belongs to the publishers Oxbow Books and it is their copyright. As author you are licenced to make up to 50 offprints from it, but beyond that you may not publish it on the World Wide Web until three years from publication (September 2012), unless the site is a limited access intranet (password protected). If you have queries about this please contact the editorial department at Oxbow Books ([email protected]). Structure, Image, Ornament: Architectural Sculpture in the Greek World Proceedings of an international conference held at the American School of Classical Studies, 27–28 November 2004 Edited by Peter Schultz and Ralf von den Hoff OXBOW BOOKS Oxford and Oakville Published by Oxbow Books, Oxford, UK © Oxbow Books and the individual authors, 2009 ISBN 978 1 84217 344 2 A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library This book is available direct from Oxbow Books, Oxford, UK (Phone: 01865-241249; Fax: 01865-794449) and The David Brown Book Company PO Box 511, Oakville, CT 06779, USA (Phone: 860-945-9329; Fax: 860-945-9468) or from our website www.oxbowbooks.com This volume was made possible by a generous grant from the Fritz-Thyssen-Stiftung, Cologne. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Structure, image, ornament : architectural sculpture in the Greek world : proceedings of an international conference held at the American School of Classical Studies, 27-28 November 2004 / edited by Peter Schultz and Ralf von den Hoff. p. cm.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. the Sanctuary of Athena in the Light of Research Since
    24 THE SCULPTURE OF THE SANCTUARY OF ATHENA POLIAS AT PRIENE THE EXPLORATION OF THE SANCTUARY 25 drawings, if they were ever made, have not survived, but the extensive correspondence he Pullan found the cella walls standing I .5 m. high on the north side. In Pullan's photographs had with the Parisian engraver of the volume has, and it attests to the assiduity and care the door frames of the cella and opisthodumos, the bases of the antae on both ends and the the scholars and craftsmen involved had for its final appearance. The correspondence has plinths of the columns of the east facade are in situ. The columns of the opisthodomos, intact to a been preserved together with Pullan's in the Dilettanti archives at the Society of Antiquaries. height of 3 or 4 m., as Pullan proudly noted, made the Temple one of the better-preserved monuments of Ionic architecture in Asia Minor. All this had disappeared, along with the 4. pavement and steps of the cella and pronaos and, of course, everything on them.-~heAltar THE SANCTUARY OF ATHENA IN THE LIGHT OF fared little better. The steps and podia blocks, in situ for Pullan's camera, had been scattered RESEARCH SINCE 1869 when Schrader arrived. Only the Propylon was in more or less the same condition. The A great deal has been learned by students of the Sanctuary and its architecture, and many lowest course of its wall on the south side, though, was completely preserved in 1869, with fresh problems raised since Pullan's day.
    [Show full text]
  • September 1922
    Fil Vol. LI I CONTENTS Serial No. 3 SEPTEMBER, 1922 No. 288 Page "TOWARDS A NEW THEATRE." 171 By Claude Bragdon, F. A. I. A. Being a Description with Commentary of a New Type of Theatre Building, designed by Norman-Bel Geddes THE PHI DELTA THETA FRATERNITY HOUSE, Cor- nell University, Ithaca, N. Y.: William McLeish Dunbar, Architect - - 183 By Albert C. Phelps. THE KENSINGTON SCHOOL, Great Neck, L. I. : Wesley Sherwood Bessell, Architect 198 By Harold Donaldson Eberlein. PORTFOLIO OF CURRENT ARCHITECTURE - - 211 THE OLD HOUSES OF MICHIGAN - - - 227 By Fiske Kimball. THE ARCHITECT AS A FACTOR IN THE CONSTRUC- TION BUSINESS - - 241 By Thomas S. Holden, Statistician, The F. W. Dodge Company. NOTES AND COMMENTS 245 COVER Water Color by Otto Eggers Editor: MICHAEL A. MIKKELSEN Business Manager: J. A. OAKLEY Contributing Editors: GEORGE BURNAP HERBERT CROLY RUSSELL F. WHITEHEAD PUBLISHED MONTHLY BY THE ARCHITECTURAL RECORD COMPANY 115-119 WEST FORTIETH STREET, NEW YORK T. 8. MORGAN, Pres. M. A. MIKKELSEN, Vice- Pres. B. S. DODGE, Vlce-Pres. J. W. FRANK, Sec'y-Treas. Yearly Subscription: United States, $3.00; Foreign, $4.00; Single Copies, 35 cents. Copyright, 1922, by The Architectural Record Co. All rights reserved. Member Audit Bureau of Circulation. - - r A scene from the first act of Mr. Geddes' "Erminie" production, transported without change to his new type of theatre. Every spectator sees everything on the stage at all times. The entire scene yields a sense of luminous space and distance impossible in the existing type of stage. The point of sight in this drawing is from the seat farthest from the stage.
    [Show full text]
  • THE EARLIER TEMPLE of ARTEMIS at EPHESUS. the Sculpture. THE
    THE EARLIER TEMPLE OF ARTEMIS AT EPHESUS. The Sculpture. THE most remarkable characteristic of the temple built in the sixth century was the figure sculpture which surrounded the lower drums of the columns on one or both of the fronts. This feature was certainly not an architectural freak, and the band of figures must either have been thought of as a sculptured dado or derived from Egyptian prototypes such as the sculptured columns of Medinet Abou. Both antecedents may have influ- enced the choice, but the former was a sufficient and the more probable source. The sculptured dado was the first form of sculptured ' frieze'; in ' Mycenaean' palaces dadoes of plain or sculptured slabs faced and protected the lower parts of crude brick walls. The two fragments of slabs with reliefs of oxen from Mycenae in the Elgin collection formed part of such a dado. The great Assyrian and Persian slabs followed the same traditions of structure and decoration, and recent explorations of Hittite sites have shown that the sculptured dado was a fundamental tradition in the arts of Asia Minor. Not only did the sculptured bands of the Nereid Monument, the tomb at Trysa, and the Mausoleum fall in with this rule of the dado, but we find in it the first cause of the sculptured pedestals of the Hel- lenistic temple at Ephesus and of the podium of the Altar of Per- gamon—the king of all dadoes. At the Croesus temple at Ephesus the sculptured band appeared on parts of the walls at the antae as well as on the columns.
    [Show full text]