The Botanic Garden

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Botanic Garden See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259274395 The Botanic Garden Data · December 2013 CITATIONS READS 0 3,031 1 author: Anis Mukhopadhyay University of Calcutta 8 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: On economic history of Malda District of West Bengal (India) View project All content following this page was uploaded by Anis Mukhopadhyay on 13 December 2013. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. The Botanic Garden Dr. Anis Mukhopadhyay Honorary Associate, Centre for Urban Economic Studies, University of Calcutta; Former Associate Professor in Economics, Shibpur Dinobundhoo Institution (College), Howrah – 711 102; and Secretary, South Howrah Citizens’ Forum [email protected] January 2010 1 The Botanic Garden, Shibpur Acharya Jagadish Chandra Bose Indian Botanic Garden (formerly known as Indian Botanic Garden and Royal Botanic Garden, Calcutta), spread over 273 acres of land, is situated close to Bengal Engineering and Science University; and both the places are prides of Shibpur, Howrah. Botanical Survey of India (BSI) is in charge of the Garden and BSI is now under the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India. This Botanic Garden is the largest and the oldest of its kind in South-East Asia, catering to the needs of education, research and recreation. The commercial and military importance of botanical investigations could be realized by the East India Company only after it secured a firm grip over Bengal and Madras. In 1778, James Anderson, a surgeon with the Madras Army, obtained a large piece of wasteland near Fort St George, and there he experimented with the cultivation of sugar cane, coffee, American cotton and European apples. In the second half of the eighteenth century, after the East India Company seized political power of Bengal and after the great famine of 1770, the company’s administration were in the look out for new varieties of food plants which can be grown on poorer soil and without much cultivating attention. Lt. Colonel Robert Kyd of the Bengal Army, Military Secretary to the then Governor of Bengal and a man distinguished for his own Research-Garden at Shalimar in the neighbourhood, submitted a scheme of ‘Garden of Acclimatization’ near Calcutta; he suggested to the Government in Calcutta in June 1776 for the establishment of a nursery for growing a number of food plants as well as a number of spice-plants in which the Company traded at that time with Java and adjoining archipelago. It was also suggested that the nursery would grow teak trees which would yield the necessary timber for the repair of Company’s ships. The proposal was approved in July 1787 and Col. Kyd was entrusted with the task of finding a suitable land on the western bank of the river. In addition to such a proposal, Colonel Kyd was really interested in encouragement of the study of Botany within a regular system sponsored by the company. The Royal Botanic Garden, Kew (at a small distance from London) is younger to the Royal Botanic Garden, Shibpur (at a small distance from Calcutta) by about fifty years; but the two gardens have 2 different origins. Later, both the gardens became a source of scientific information, research and recreation; but the Kew Garden has been developed as the largest botanic garden with the largest herbarium in the world. After selection of the site, the government granted the land for the Botanic Garden, a deep trench around the land was dug and a fence was erected. Col. Kyd as the honorary Superintendent of this Botanic Garden took primary initiative to lay the garden and plant different species collected from various parts of the globe, many of which did not survive in the local climate and soil. Col. Kyd lived in his own garden house at Shalimar, worked for the Botanic Garden for about six years and died in 1793 (May 26). Col. Kyd was so attached to the Botanic Garden and his Shalimar garden that in his dying directives (last Will May 18, 1793) he mentioned about the upkeep of the Botanic Garden, care of his permanent attendants and also “last remains be committed to the ground, in my own garden … near an Alligator tree … and that my funeral expenses do not exceed rupees three hundred”. In disregard to his ‘Will’ he was buried in the Park Street Cemetery at a cost of over eight hundred rupees. However, in his memory, a beautiful marble urn was erected in the Botanic Garden on a site selected by William Roxburgh, his successor. During those days, it was known as Company Bagan (Garden of the East India Company). In 1796, the Directors of the East India Company sent several mahogany plants for the Garden. The teak and mahogany plants were first deposited in the Governor-General’s garden in Alipore till their implant in the Garden was sanctioned. Col. Kyd was succeeded by Dr. William Roxburgh (of Ayrshire in North Britain) in 1793, the first salaried Superintendent of the Garden who took charge on an invitation from the Bengal Government. He was a Botanist who made immense contribution to the study of Indian Botany and is regarded by many as the father of Indian Botany. He was also interested in meteorological impact on droughts and famine, and therefore, recommended food tree plantation like coconut, date, jackfruit etc in the countryside and in public land, which would furnish sustenance to the poor in times of scarcity. Earlier, at Samalcotta near Madras, he had experimented with pepper and indigo. The Court 3 approved of such efforts but appreciated more that part of his activity which had a commercial bearing, and for this chose him for Calcutta. Under the leadership of the enthusiastic Botanist Dr. Roxburgh and with the assistance from his fellow scientists in India and in Europe, the original commercial objective of the Garden was gradually pushed to the background and the Royal Botanic Garden was planned and landscaped entirely for scientific studies. He added to the Calcutta botanic garden largest ever species of plants and trees; his work on economic botany also earned him gold medals from the Society of Arts. The Garden in his time flourished both as a scene of useful botanical experiments and as a pleasant lounge for visitors to enjoy a holiday. Residential quarter for the Superintendent Dr. Roxburgh was constructed within the garden in 1795 and he retired from service in 1813 to go back to his native Scotland where he died in 1815. The most notable find of Roxburgh was Nathaniel Wallich, a surgeon attached to the Danish settlement at Serampore, who was taken a prisoner of war in early 1809 when several French, Dutch and Danish settlements in and around India were attacked by the British at the time of Napoleonic wars. Wallich had been earning handsome amount in private practice; but he agreed to serve as a botanist on ‘whatever allowance’ the government would grant and declared that his object was to gain knowledge and not to make money. But, when the question of finding a successor to Roxburgh arose, Wallich did not find a favour from the administration; finally, he got charge of the Shibpur botanic garden on a later date through interference and lobbying by William Carey. Wallich soon earned reputation of being an avid plant collector for the purpose of which he widely surveyed Bengal, Bihar, Nepal, Penang, Singapur, Burma and China. He also distributed the specimens as widely as possible among science institutions. Still the Calcutta Botanic Garden, the biggest in the country, remained only a mixed collection of several thousand species; and T. Thompson, the Superintendent reported in 1856 that the scientific character of the garden suffered, because the library, the herbarium and the museum starved from want of fund. But botanical investigations did not stop mainly due to the dedication of botanists and the relationship between science and working of colonial commercial and military objectives dubbed by some social historians as ‘colonial science’ which is, in fact, a paradigm of scientific development in a colonial situation. 4 After Dr. Roxburgh, for four years, the Garden was in charge of Dr. Francis Buchanan who became well known later as Sir Francis Buchanan Hamilton, the naturalist and field survey worker and also as the compiler of the first series of Bengal District Gazetteers. Wallich entered the garden administration and research after Dr. Francis Buchanan. Dr. Nathaniel Wallich not only played a great role in the Shibpur Botanic Garden by his enormous collections, cataloguing and extension of research work, but he was also one of the founders of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. Originally, the Garden was on 300 acres; in 1819 about 31 acres was detached from it to the Lord Bishop of Calcutta for founding Bishop’s College; and another portion of the garden land was detached in 1864 for construction of a road to Howrah along the north of Bishop’s College. A plot of land, about 2 acres, in the Garden was given conditionally to Agricultural and Horticultural Society for a nursery garden; the area under the Society expanded in size up to 1835, but was also ultimately resumed in 1872 when it was transferred to Society’s own Garden in Alipore. This Society was founded in September 1820 by the eminent Baptist Missionary Dr. William Carey; and it had an office, meeting room, library and museum in the Metcalfe Hall, Calcutta. William Carey was the Society’s first President; and Dwarakanath Tagore and Dr. Nathaniel Wallich were also involved in the Agricultural and Horticultural Society.
Recommended publications
  • The Extraordinary Lives of Lorenzo Da Ponte & Nathaniel Wallich
    C O N N E C T I N G P E O P L E , P L A C E S , A N D I D E A S : S T O R Y B Y S T O R Y J ULY 2 0 1 3 ABOUT WRR CONTRIBUTORS MISSION SPONSORSHIP MEDIA KIT CONTACT DONATE Search Join our mailing list and receive Email Print More WRR Monthly. Wild River Consulting ESSAY-The Extraordinary Lives of Lorenzo Da Ponte & Nathaniel & Wallich : Publishing Click below to make a tax- deductible contribution. Religious Identity in the Age of Enlightenment where Your literary b y J u d i t h M . T a y l o r , J u l e s J a n i c k success is our bottom line. PEOPLE "By the time the Interv iews wise woman has found a bridge, Columns the crazy woman has crossed the Blogs water." PLACES Princeton The United States The World Open Borders Lorenzo Da Ponte Nathaniel Wallich ANATOLIAN IDEAS DAYS & NIGHTS Being Jewish in a Christian world has always been fraught with difficulties. The oppression of the published by Art, Photography and Wild River Books Architecture Jews in Europe for most of the last two millennia was sanctioned by law and without redress. Valued less than cattle, herded into small enclosed districts, restricted from owning land or entering any Health, Culture and Food profession, and subject to random violence and expulsion at any time, the majority of Jews lived a History , Religion and Reserve Your harsh life.1 The Nazis used this ancient technique of de-humanization and humiliation before they hit Philosophy Wild River Ad on the idea of expunging the Jews altogether.
    [Show full text]
  • The Linnean NEWSLETTER and PROCEEDINGS of the LINNEAN SOCIETY of LONDON
    The Linnean NEWSLETTER AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON Volume 36 Number 1 April 2020 Gangetic Fishes: Parallel History: A British Discovery: Francis Hamilton's Gesellscha� Naturforschender William Bingley FLS commissioned images Freunde zu Berlin AND MORE... Communicating nature since 1788 The Linnean Society of London Burlington House, Piccadilly, London W1J 0BF UK Toynbee House, 92–94 Toynbee Road, Wimbledon SW20 8SL UK (by appointment only) +44 (0)20 7434 4479 www.linnean.org [email protected] @LinneanSociety President SECRETARIES COUNCIL Dr Sandra Knapp Scienti fi c The Offi cers () Vice Presidents Vice Presidents Prof. Simon Hiscock Dr Malcolm Scoble Dr Colin Clubbe Dr Olwen Grace Mathew Frith Dr Blanca Huertas Editorial Prof. Beverley Glover Prof. Paul Henderson Prof. Mark Chase FRS Prof. Anjali Goswami Dr Malcolm Scoble Prof. Alistair Hetherington Collecti ons Prof. Alan Hildrew Treasurer Prof. Dame Georgina Mace FRS Dr Mark Watson Dr John David Dr Silvia Pressel Strategy Prof. Max Telford Dr Natasha de Vere Prof. David Cutler Stephanie West THE TEAM Execu� ve Secretary Financial Controller & Conservator Dr Elizabeth Rollinson Membership Offi cer Janet Ashdown Priya Nithianandan Head of Collec� ons Special Publica� ons Manager Dr Isabelle Charman� er Buildings & Offi ce Manager Leonie Berwick Librarian Helen Shaw Educa� on & Public Engagement Will Beharrell Communica� ons & Events Manager Joe Burton Archivist Manager (To be announced) Mul� media Content Producer c Ross Ziegelmeier Liz M Gow Room Hire & Membership Assistant Archivist Assistant Ta� ana Franco BioMedia Meltdown Project Luke Thorne Offi cer Daryl Stenvoll-Wells Digital Assets Manager Archivist emerita Andrea Deneau Engagement Research & Gina Douglas Delivery Offi cer Zia Forrai Editor Publishing in The Linnean Gina Douglas The Linnean is published twice a year, in April and October.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Notes on Asian Birds. 38. the Mcclelland Drawings and a Reappraisal of the 1835-36 Survey of the Birds of Assam
    ZV-344 063-106 | 38 05-01-2007 07:48 Page 63 Systematic notes on Asian birds. 38. The McClelland drawings and a reappraisal of the 1835-36 survey of the birds of Assam E.C. Dickinson With an Appendix by M.P. Walters Dickinson, E.C. Systematic notes on Asian birds. 38. The McClelland drawings and a reappraisal of the 1835-36 survey of the birds of Assam. Zool. Verh. Leiden 344, 12.ix.2003: 63-106, figs 1-4.— ISSN 0024-1652/ISBN 90-73239-88-5. Edward C. Dickinson, c/o The Trust for Oriental Ornithology, Flat 3, Bolsover Court, 19 Bolsover Road, Eastbourne, East Sussex, BN20 7JG, U.K. (e-mail: [email protected]). Keywords: McClelland; Horsfield; drawings; birds; Assam; history; British Library; Melanochlora; neo- type; Tesia olivea. McClelland brought back specimens and drawings from a survey in 1835-36 (and perhaps 1836-37). New birds were described in a paper read by Horsfield (1840). A comparison of the McClelland draw- ings of birds, held at the British Library, with the type specimens of birds newly named in 1840 and with other material has shown that McClelland’s collection was not fully reported. McClelland actually recorded about 170 species not just 96 as then listed. Some birds listed in 1840 were misidentified, of these some have been corrected earlier but at least one is here newly considered and looks as if it needs further correction. Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes are included when necessary. The correct name to apply to the one species in the genus Melanochlora, the Sultan Tit, is not safely established but as dating is not proven the name in present usage is maintained for the sake of stability.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Dynamic Loading on Jute-Based Needle-Punched
    Indian Journal of Natural Products and Resources Vol. 12(1), March 2021, pp. 11-25 ‘Discovery’ of the tea plant Thea assamica (now, Camellia sinensis var. assamica) in the Indian territory in the 1830s Anantanarayanan Raman1,2,* 1Health & Biosecurity Division, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Floreat Park, WA 6014, Australia 2School of Agricultural & Wine Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia Received 03 December 2019; Revised 09 December 2020 The tea plant (Camellia sinensis, Theaceae; previously Thea sinensis, Ternstrœmiaceae) is a highly sought-after beverage source today. In 2018 alone, c. 270 B L of tea was consumed throughout the world. Global recognition of green tea has enhanced majorly, especially in the later decades of the 20th century, because of the level of antioxidants (c. 450 mg of vitamin C equivalents) it includes, currently seen valuable in the general well-being of humans. In this article, I chronicle the events that steered the ‘discovery’ of Thea assamica (presently, C. sinensis var. assamica) in the wilderness of Upper Assam (the Ahôm country) and its commercial, large-scale production. William Griffith, who searched it and wrote on the T. assamica material growing in the Indian territory in the 1830s, examined the plant community in which the natural populations of T. assamica grew, in addition to writing on the soil and other related aspects vital for its large-scale cultivation. His notes shed light on an early understanding of the ‘ecosystem’ in which T. assamica grew in the wild. Griffith clarifies that they spread naturally along the river and creek beds in North-eastern India from the neighbouring Chinese territory over the last several hundreds of years.
    [Show full text]
  • Wallich and His Contribution to the Indian Natural History
    Rheedea Vol. 26(1) 13–20 2016 Wallich and his contribution to the Indian natural history Ranee Om Prakash Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected]. Abstract Various activities of Nathaniel Wallich, especially those that connect with Indian natural history are briefly reviewed. Wallich rose to a naturalist of international standard from a prisoner of war in discovering the riches of the then British India and reporting to the learned world. He established a close network of leading experts in the field of natural history and exchanged plant materials for the benefit of both the donor and receiving countries. During his superintendence of the then Royal Botanic Garden, Calcutta, which prevailed nearly three decades, Wallich introduced useful plants from across the world and elevated the status of the Garden as one of the finest in the world, published over 8,000 new species, about 142 genera of plants and established a world class herbarium. An initiative funded by the World Collections Programme has tried to give due recognition to Wallich towards his contribution to natural history by hosting a website (www.kew. org/wallich). This is a joint collaborative project between Kew Gardens, The Natural History Museum, London and The British Library with additional inputs from the Acharya Jagdish Chandra Bose Indian Botanic Garden, Howrah and The National Archives of India, New Delhi. Keywords: Collections, Herbarium, Online Resource, Wallich Catalogue Introduction located next to the river and use similar irrigation systems. Kew Garden was built in 1759 and the Nathaniel Wallich (1785–1854) spent 34 years in Calcutta Botanic Garden was established in 1787.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives DOI 10.1007/S12038-013-9316-9
    Perspectives DOI 10.1007/s12038-013-9316-9 Natural history in India during the 18th and 19th centuries RAJESH KOCHHAR Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Mohali 140 306, Punjab (Email, [email protected]) 1. Introduction courier. We shall focus on India-based Europeans who built a scientific reputation for themselves; there were of course European access to India was multi-dimensional: The others who merely served as suppliers. merchant-rulers were keen to identify commodities that could be profitably exported to Europe, cultivate commercial plants in India that grew outside their possessions, and find 2. Tranquebar and Madras (1768–1793) substitutes for drugs and simples that were obtained from the Americas. The ever-increasing scientific community in As in geography, the earliest centre for botanical and zoo- Europe was excited about the opportunities that the vast logical research was South India. Europe-dictated scientific landmass of India offered in natural history studies. On their botany was begun in India by a direct pupil of Linnaeus not part, the Christianity enthusiasts in Europe viewed European in the British possessions but in the tiny Danish enclave of rule in India as a godsend for propagating the Gospel in the Tranquebar, which though of little significance as far as East. These seemingly diverse interests converged at various commerce or geo-politics was concerned, came to play an levels. Christian missionaries as a body were the first edu- extraordinary role in the cultural and scientific history of cated Europeans in India. As in philology, they were pio- India. neers in natural history also.
    [Show full text]
  • V14-Issue4 Farquhar.Pdf
    BIBLIOASIA JAN - MAR 2019 VOL. 14 ISSUE 04 FEATURE In 1830, William Farquhar (1774–1839) wrote to The Asiatic Journal explaining Farquhar why he was due “at least a large share” iof the credit in forming Singapore.1 Yet, & it is Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) alone who is hailed as the founder of Singapore. This notion, propounded by his biographers, has been reinforced by constant repetition, official acceptance and the omnipresence of Raffles’ name in Singapore. In contrast, Farquhar’s pivotal role in the events leading up to the founding of the British settlement in Singapore in (Above) Colonel William Farquhar, c. 1830. Image source: Wikimedia Commons. February 1819 and during its nascent Raffles years has been vastly underrated. To (Above right) A portrait of Sir Stamford Raffles presented by his nephew, W.C. Raffles Flint, to London’s National Gallery Portrait Gallery in 1859. Image source: Wikimedia Commons. add insult to injury, Farquhar has been mocked, and his character and accom- The Untold Story plishments belittled over the years. ing School and paved the way for his recently included in the history curriculum To understand the origins of this employment at India House, while his of Singapore schools, the Raffles myth The founding of Singapore in 1819 and aberration in Singapore’s history, we later career and status were propelled has prevailed. A group of students who its early development have traditionally must turn to the biographies of Raffles. by his patron, Lord Minto, the Governor- re-assessed the roles of Raffles and Far- The first, The Life of Sir Stamford Raffles, General of Bengal.
    [Show full text]
  • Botany in British India Material
    Botany in British India Material The files listed below are from the India Office Records. They cover the following topics: botanical gardens; botanical collecting; useful plants (economic and medicinal). The material testifies to the pioneering work of surgeon-naturalists, who expended much energy in making British India a vital part in a larger process: the transmission of plants and scientific techniques and ideas around the globe. Selected Digitised Material With summary descriptions. Fuller descriptions accompany the digitised images. In Order of Reference: F – Board of Control Records Teak plantations. 1793-1800 IOR/F/4/99/2028 Forests of India. 1802-1804 IOR/F/4/168/2950 Cultivation of the potato. 1803-1804 IOR/F/4/179/3224 Edible vegetable products of India. 1810-1811. IOR/F/4/379/9495 Saharanpur Botanic Garden: reports by George Govan. 1820-1821.IOR/F/4/660/18324 Cotton and tobacco cultivation in the United States of America. 1827-2 8 IOR/F/4/1079/29439 Spice gardens of Tinnevelly. 1826-1828. IOR/F/4/1187/30806 Saharanpur Botanic Garden. 1825-1829. IOR/F/4/1191/30877 Dye produced from redwood tree. 1831-33. IOR/F/4/1330/52529 Agricultural and Horticultural Society of Calcutta. 1830-34 IOR/F/4/1546/61487 Papers relative to cotton experiments in the Bombay Presidency. 1835-36 IOR/F/4/1635/65498 Cotton cultivation in Madras. 1835-36. IOR/F/4/1667/66696 Cultivation of cotton and senna. 1837 IOR/F/4/1737/70400 Hemp plantation in Saharanpur botanic gardens. 1839 IOR/F/4/1754/71645 Employment of Robert Wight as agricultural researcher in Madras Presidency.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wardian Case: How a Simple Box Moved the Plant Kingdom
    The Wardian Case: How a Simple Box Moved the Plant Kingdom Luke Keogh n 1873, before a single road was laid at the Atlantic. He hoped the ferns, from Califor- the Arnold Arboretum, founding director nia and Colorado, might impress his colleagues ICharles Sprague Sargent packed a Ward- at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, in particu- ian case full of ferns from the American West. lar the director, Joseph Hooker. Wardian cases—wood and glass boxes shaped Sargent wanted to make sure that Kew’s col- like small, moveable greenhouses—were used lection of North American ferns was “as com- for transporting live plants. They were often plete as possible.” In the April 2, 1873, letter more delicate than typical cargo, so to ensure that accompanied the Wardian case Sargent protection Sargent sent the box to England with wrote to Hooker: “If … you have all you want, a friend who also happened to be sailing across will you kindly send them on to the Jardin des ECONOMIC BOTANY COLLECTION, ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS, KEW BOTANIC COLLECTION, ROYAL ECONOMIC BOTANY This Wardian case dates to around 1870. The Wardian Case 3 live plants around the globe had become extensive. This had only become possible because of the invention of the Wardian case. The letter also shows that botanists, arborists, agriculturists, and horticul- turists from around the globe needed to ARCHIVES OF THE ARNOLD ARBORETUM remain in constant contact. Indeed, they could use one contact to begin a dialogue with another, in this case using Hooker to re-open contact with Paris. At all times these networks relied on reciprocity—one institution sends some plants and the receiver sends some back.
    [Show full text]
  • HUNTIA a Journal of Botanical History
    HUNTIA A Journal of botanical History VolUme 14 NUmber 1 2009 Hunt Institute for botanical Documentation Carnegie mellon University Pittsburgh The Hunt Institute for botanical Documentation, a research division of Carnegie mellon University, specializes in the history of botany and all aspects of plant science and serves the international scientific community through research and documentation. To this end, the Institute acquires and maintains authoritative collections of books, plant images, manuscripts, portraits and data files, and provides publications and other modes of information service. The Institute meets the reference needs of botanists, biologists, historians, conservationists, librarians, bibliographers and the public at large, especially those concerned with any aspect of the North American flora. Huntia publishes articles on all aspects of the history of botany, including exploration, art, literature, biography, iconography and bibliography. The journal is published irregularly in one or more numbers per volume of approximately 200 pages by the Hunt Institute for botanical Documentation. external contributions to Huntia are welcomed. Page charges have been eliminated. All manuscripts are subject to external peer review. before submitting manuscripts for consideration, please review the “Guidelines for Contributors” on our Web site. Direct editorial correspondence to the editor. Send books for announcement or review to the book reviews and Announcements editor. The subscription rate is $60.00 per volume. Send orders for subscriptions and back issues to the Institute. Hunt Institute Associates may elect to receive Huntia as a benefit of membership; contact the Institute for more information. Hunt Institute for botanical Documentation Carnegie mellon University 5th Floor, Hunt library 4909 Frew Street Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890 Telephone: 412-268-2434 email: [email protected] Web site: http://huntbot.andrew.cmu.edu/ HIbD/Publications/HI-Pubs/Pub-Huntia.shtml editor and layout Scarlett T.
    [Show full text]
  • PC25 Doc. 19 Add
    Original language: English PC25 Doc. 19 Addendum CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ___________________ Twenty-fifth meeting of the Plants Committee Online, 2-4, 21 and 23 June 2021 Interpretation and implementation matters Regulation of trade ADDENDUM TO IDENTIFICATION OF TIMBER AND OTHER WOOD PRODUCTS 1. This document has been prepared by the co-chairs of the working group on identification of timber and other wood products.* Update on progress since May 2020 2. Following the postponement due to the COVID-19 pandemic of the 25th meeting of the Plants Committee, scheduled to take place from 17 to 23 July 2020, the Committee took a number of intersessional decisions (see Notification no. 2020/056 of 21 September 2020), including the establishment of an intersessional working group on Identification of timber and other wood products, with the following mandate: a) consider the progress reported by the Secretariat in document PC25 Doc. 19 on the implementation of Decisions 18.140 to 18.143 and 16.58 (Rev. CoP18), and any other relevant documentation produced by the Secretariat or published on the CITES website; b) determine gaps and complementarities in various tools and knowledge sources for timber identification, such as existing field identification guidelines and keys, and on their availability and usefulness; c) develop standardized information templates and other tools that could be used by Parties to facilitate information sharing on the content and status of wood sample collections, and
    [Show full text]
  • 3. History of Taxonomic Research in Singapore
    FLORA OF SINGAPORE (Vol. 1: 15–36, 2019) 3. HISTORY OF TAXONOMIC RESEARCH IN SINGAPORE D.J. Middleton1 & I.M. Turner1,2 All that we know about the plant diversity of Singapore begins with people going out into the field and collecting plants, preparing those plants for the herbarium (and laboratory), studying them, and publishing the fruits of their labours in scientific journals and books. Singapore has by far the highest plant collection density in Southeast Asia and one of the highest in the world (Middleton et al., 2019). The more collections that are made over as wide an area as possible, the more likely the plant diversity of Singapore is properly accounted for. In this chapter we shall discuss the history of botanical collections in Singapore, the people who have been influential in botanical research in Singapore, and the seminal publications that arose from this research. Beginnings We cannot be sure when the first botanical collections intended for research were made in Singapore. Cowan (1954), in a work on the collections of the Scottish collectors Archibald Menzies (1754–1842) and William Jack (1795–1822), noted the possibility that Menzies collected in Singapore in 1789. Menzies is most celebrated for his pioneering botanical work in North America (Galloway & Groves, 1987) but earlier in his life he sailed aboard the Prince of Wales which visited Sumatra in 1789 and from which a small number of collections are extant and now housed in the herbarium of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh. Cowan (1954) noted that there was an undated Menzies collection in the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh from Singapore which, if collected by Menzies himself, could only have been collected in 1789 on the Prince of Wales expedition as that was his only visit to the region.
    [Show full text]