DOCSLIB.ORG

EPA Cyanotoxin Management in Drinking Water

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EPA Cyanotoxin Management in Drinking Water Recommendations for Public Water Systems to Manage Cyanotoxins in Drinking Water June 2015 Office of Water (4606M) EPA 815-R-15-010 June 2015 Disclaimer This document was prepared by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as an informational resource for public water systems and primacy agencies to prepare for and respond to the risk of cyanotoxins in finished water. This document is not a regulation; it is not legally enforceable; and it does not confer legal rights or impose legal obligations on any party, including EPA, States, or the regulated community. While EPA has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the discussion in this document, the obligations of the regulated community are determined by statutes, regulations, or other legally binding requirements. The recommendations discussed are not a substitute for applicable legal requirements. In the event of a conflict between the discussion in this document and any statute or regulation, this document would not be controlling. Although this document describes suggestions for managing cyanotoxin issues in raw and finished water, the recommendations may not be appropriate for all situations and alternative approaches may be applicable. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute an EPA endorsement or recommendation for use. This Page Intentionally Left Blank Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................... i Table of Exhibits .................................................................................................................... ii Abbreviations and Acronyms ................................................................................................ iii Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................. iv Preparers and Reviewers ....................................................................................................... v Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. vi A. Introduction .......................................................................................................................1 B. What is a Health Advisory? ..................................................................................................2 C. Cyanotoxin Management Plan Development .......................................................................3 D. Potential Cyanotoxin Management Steps ............................................................................5 1 Step 1: Conduct System-Specific Surface Water Evaluation ..................................................6 2 Step 2: Preparation and Observation ...................................................................................7 2.1 Preparation ........................................................................................................................8 2.2 Observation ........................................................................................................................9 2.2.1 Visual Inspection and Phytoplankton Identification ............................................................... 9 2.2.2 System Effects ....................................................................................................................... 11 2.2.3 Other Bloom Indicators ......................................................................................................... 12 2.3 Communication ................................................................................................................ 13 2.4 Source Water Mitigation ................................................................................................... 13 3 Step 3: Monitor for Cyanotoxins in Raw Water and Treatment Adjustments ....................... 15 3.1 Sampling and Analysis for Cyanotoxins .............................................................................. 15 3.1.1 Raw Water Sampling ............................................................................................................. 15 3.1.2 Sampling Logistics ................................................................................................................. 16 3.1.3 Analytical Methods ............................................................................................................... 17 3.2 Communications ............................................................................................................... 17 3.3 Treatment ........................................................................................................................ 17 4 Step 4: Monitor for Cyanotoxins in Raw and Finished Water and Treatment Adjustments .. 22 4.1 Monitoring ....................................................................................................................... 22 4.2 Communications ............................................................................................................... 23 4.3 Treatment ........................................................................................................................ 23 5 Step 5: Monitor for Cyanotoxins in Finished Water, Treatment Adjustments or Additions, and Public Communications .............................................................................................. 23 5.1 Monitoring ....................................................................................................................... 24 5.2 Communications ............................................................................................................... 25 5.3 Treatment ........................................................................................................................ 26 6 References ........................................................................................................................28... Appendix A System-Specific Evaluation Information, Tools, and Resources .............................38 Appendix B Examples of Water Utility and Community Responses to Harmful Algal Blooms.....48 Appendix C Key Questions and Answers .................................................................................50 Appendix D Potential Language for Use in a Cyanotoxin Public Notification and Social Media....54 Appendix E Long Term Mitigation Strategies and Treatment Options .......................................56 i Table of Exhibits Figure 1. Potential management steps public surface water systems may use to determine whether cyanotoxins are present in raw water or finished drinking water. .................................... 5 Figure 2. Traffic light approach to support communication and other actions in response to elevated concentrations of cyanotoxins in finished drinking water. ............................................. 27 ii Abbreviations and Acronyms ASDWA Association of State Drinking Water Administrators AWWA American Water Works Association CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CMP Cyanotoxin Management Plan CT Concentration (oxidant) x Contact Time CWA Clean Water Act DAF Dissolved Air Flotation DBP Disinfection Byproduct DWACT Drinking Water Advisory Communication Toolbox DWMAPS Drinking Water Mapping Application for Protecting Source Waters ECHO Enforcement and Compliance History Online ELISA Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay EPA Environmental Protection Agency GAC Granulated Activated Carbon HAAs Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) HAs Health Advisories HABs Harmful Algal Blooms LC/MS/MS Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry/Mass Spectrometry MCL Maximum Contaminant Level MF Microfiltration NF Nanofiltration MIB Methylisoborneol NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NPDAT Nitrogen and Phosphorus Data Access Tool NPDES National Pollution Discharge Elimination System NTU Nephelometric Turbidity Unit PAC Powdered Activated Carbon PWS Public Water System RO Reverse Osmosis SDWA Safe Drinking Water Act STORET STOrage and RETrieval SWC Source Water Collaborative TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load TTHMs Total Trihalomethanes UF Ultrafiltration USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers USDA United States Department of Agriculture U.S. EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency USGS United States Geological Survey UV Ultraviolet WHO World Health Organization WRF Water Research Foundation iii Acknowledgements EPA’s Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water would like to thank the Association of State Drinking Water Administrators, the States of California, Massachusetts, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control for their contributions to this document. Additionally, over 500 participants joined EPA at a May 11, 2015 public meeting discussing steps the Agency could take to support states and utilities in managing cyanotoxin risks in drinking water. EPA thanks these participants for their meaningful input which was critical for the development of this document. iv Preparers and Reviewers The following individuals helped to develop and review this document: Hannah Holsinger (U.S. EPA)1 James Hyde (New York State Department Kenneth Rotert (U.S. EPA)1 of Health) Lili Wang (U.S. EPA)1 Holly Kaloz (Ohio EPA) Rachel Carlson (U.S. EPA)1 Kirk Leifheit (Ohio EPA) Ryan Albert (U.S. EPA) Darren Lytle (U.S. EPA) Becky Allenbach (U.S. EPA) Casey Lyon (Oregon Health Authority) Steve Allgeier (U.S. EPA) Beth Messer (Ohio EPA) Blake Atkins (U.S. EPA)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guidelines for Design and Sampling for Cyanobacterial Toxin and Taste-And-Odor Studies in Lakes and Reservoirs
    Guidelines for Design and Sampling for Cyanobacterial Toxin and Taste-and-Odor Studies in Lakes and Reservoirs Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5038 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Photo 1 Photo 3 Photo 2 Front cover. Photograph 1: Beach sign warning of the presence of a cyanobacterial bloom, June 29, 2006 (photograph taken by Jennifer L. Graham, U.S. Geological Survey). Photograph 2: Sampling a near-shore accumulation of Microcystis, August 8, 2006 (photograph taken by Jennifer L. Graham, U.S. Geological Survey). Photograph 3: Mixed bloom of Anabaena, Aphanizomenon, and Microcystis, August 10, 2006 (photograph taken by Jennifer L. Graham, U.S. Geological Survey). Background photograph: Near-shore accumulation of Microcystis, August 8, 2006 (photograph taken by Jennifer L. Graham, U.S. Geological Survey). Guidelines for Design and Sampling for Cyanobacterial Toxin and Taste-and-Odor Studies in Lakes and Reservoirs By Jennifer L. Graham, Keith A. Loftin, Andrew C. Ziegler, and Michael T. Meyer Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5038 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyanobacterial Toxins: Saxitoxins
    WHO/SDE/WSH/xxxxx English only Cyanobacterial toxins: Saxitoxins Background document for development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality and Guidelines for Safe Recreational Water Environments Version for Public Review Nov 2019 © World Health Organization 20XX Preface Information on cyanobacterial toxins, including saxitoxins, is comprehensively reviewed in a recent volume to be published by the World Health Organization, “Toxic Cyanobacteria in Water” (TCiW; Chorus & Welker, in press). This covers chemical properties of the toxins and information on the cyanobacteria producing them as well as guidance on assessing the risks of their occurrence, monitoring and management. In contrast, this background document focuses on reviewing the toxicological information available for guideline value derivation and the considerations for deriving the guideline values for saxitoxin in water. Sections 1-3 and 8 are largely summaries of respective chapters in TCiW and references to original studies can be found therein. To be written by WHO Secretariat Acknowledgements To be written by WHO Secretariat 5 Abbreviations used in text ARfD Acute Reference Dose bw body weight C Volume of drinking water assumed to be consumed daily by an adult GTX Gonyautoxin i.p. intraperitoneal i.v. intravenous LOAEL Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level neoSTX Neosaxitoxin NOAEL No Observed Adverse Effect Level P Proportion of exposure assumed to be due to drinking water PSP Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning PST paralytic shellfish toxin STX saxitoxin STXOL saxitoxinol
    [Show full text]
  • The Spatial and Temporal Distribution and Environmental Drivers Of
    THE SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION AND POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL DRIVERS OF SAXITOXIN IN NORTHWEST OHIO Callie A. Nauman A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May 2020 Committee: Timothy Davis, Advisor George Bullerjahn Justin Chaffin © 2020 Callie A. Nauman All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Timothy Davis, Advisor Cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms threaten freshwater quality and human health around the world. One specific threat is the ability of some cyanobacteria to produce multiple types of toxins, including a range of neurotoxins called saxitoxins. While it is not completely understood, the general consensus is environmental factors like phosphorus, nitrogen, and light availability, may be driving forces in saxitoxin production. Recent surveys have determined saxitoxin and potential saxitoxin producing cyanobacterial species in both lakes and rivers across the United States and Ohio. Research evaluating benthic cyanobacterial blooms determined benthic cyanobacteria as a source for saxitoxin production in systems, specifically rivers. Currently, little is known about when, where, why, or who is producing saxitoxin in Ohio, and even less is known about the role benthic cyanobacterial blooms play in Ohio waterways. With increased detections of saxitoxin, the saxitoxin biosynthesis gene sxtA, and saxitoxin producing species in both the Western Basin of Lake Erie and the lake’s major tributary the Maumee River, seasonal sampling was conducted to monitor saxitoxin in both systems. The sampling took place from late spring to early autumn of 2018 and 2019. Monitoring including bi-/weekly water column sampling in the Maumee River and Lake Erie and Nutrient Diffusing Substrate (NDS) Experiments, were completed to evaluate saxitoxin, sxtA, potential environmental drivers, and benthic production.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmful Algal Blooms (Habs) and Desalination: a Guide to Impacts, Monitoring, and Management
    Manuals and Guides 78 Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs) and Desalination: A Guide to Impacts, Monitoring, and Management Edited by: Donald M. Anderson, Siobhan F.E. Boerlage, Mike B. Dixon UNESCO Manuals and Guides 78 Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs) and Desalination: A Guide to Impacts, Monitoring and Management Edited by: Donald M. Anderson* Biology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA Siobhan F. E. Boerlage Boerlage Consulting Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia Mike B. Dixon MDD Consulting, Kensington Calgary, Alberta, Canada *Corresponding Author’s email: [email protected] UNESCO 2017 Bloom prevention and control 7 BLOOM PREVENTION AND CONTROL Clarissa R. Anderson1, Kevin G. Sellner2, and Donald M. Anderson3 1University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA USA 2Chesapeake Research Consortium, Edgewater MD USA 3Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole MA USA 7.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 205 7.2 Bloom prevention .................................................................................................................................. 207 7.2.1 Nutrient load reduction .................................................................................................................. 207 7.2.2 Nutrient load .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cyanobacteria and Cyanotoxin Analysis and Testing Services [As of 3/15/2016]
    Cyanobacteria/Cyanotoxin Testing Services List Developed by the NEIWPCC HAB Workgroup (Northeast state health and environmental agency staff). The New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission is a non-profit organization established through an act of Congress in 1947. NEIWPCC strives to: coordinate activities and forums that encourage cooperation among the states; educate the public about key environmental issues; support research projects, train environmental professionals, and provide overall leadership in the management and protection of water quality. Cyanobacteria and Cyanotoxin Analysis and Testing Services [As of 3/15/2016] Disclaimer: Individuals and/or companies listed below have been identified as performing services related to cyanobacteria and cyanotoxin analysis. This should not be considered an endorsement by NEIWPCC or any state agency of their qualifications. Public Water Systems considering contracting with any individual or company should verify that they have the adequate training and are competent to perform the work for which they are being considered. Prices should be viewed as guidelines of what to expect for each lab, rather than final quotes – many offer discounts, e.g., for bulk samples. Academy of Natural Sciences – Phycology Section Patrick Center for Environmental Research 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway Philadelphia, PA 19103 Tel: (215) 299-1080 Fax: (215) 299-1079 Email General: [email protected] Email Don Charles: [email protected] Email Frank Acker (primary soft-algae taxonomist): [email protected] Services: Identification of algae and algal measurements/biovolume, cell counts, chlorophyll Pricing: (Can give estimate based on sample, and separate the phytoplankton and periphyton in terms of how they are processed) Semiquantitative count (relative abundance, five-point scale, rare to abundant) – $150-200 Algal identification (cell count, biovolume) – $440-550 Chlorophyll (fluorometer) – Call for cost Diatom count – $300 Aquatic Services, Wayne Carmichael, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmful Algal Blooms: Dominance in Lakes and Risk for Cyanotoxin Exposure in Food Crops
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 8-2020 Harmful Algal Blooms: Dominance in Lakes and Risk for Cyanotoxin Exposure in Food Crops Austin D. Bartos Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Food Science Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Bartos, Austin D., "Harmful Algal Blooms: Dominance in Lakes and Risk for Cyanotoxin Exposure in Food Crops" (2020). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 7871. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/7871 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOMS: DOMINANCE IN LAKES AND RISK FOR CYANOTOXIN EXPOSURE IN FOOD CROPS by Austin D. Bartos A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Ecology Approved: ______________________ ____________________ Janice Brahney, Ph.D. Daniel Drost, Ph.D. Major Professor Committee Member _____________________ ____________________ William Doucette, Ph.D. Janis L. Boettinger, Ph.D. Committee Member Acting Vice Provost of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2020 ii Copyright © Austin D. Bartos 2020 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Harmful Algal Blooms: Dominance in Lakes and Risk for Cyanotoxin Exposure in Food Crops by Austin D. Bartos, Master of Science Utah State University, 2020 Major Professor: Dr. Janice Brahney Department: Watershed Sciences Harmful algal blooms (HABs) producing cyanotoxins have increased worldwide in the past decade and threaten human and ecosystem health.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyanobacterial Toxins: Saxitoxins
    WHO/HEP/ECH/WSH/2020.8 Cyanobacterial toxins: saxitoxins Background document for development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality and Guidelines for Safe Recreational Water Environments WHO/HEP/ECH/WSH/2020.8 © World Health Organization 2020 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization (http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/ mediation/rules/). Suggested citation. Cyanobacterial toxins: saxitoxins. Background document for development of WHO Guidelines for drinking-water quality and Guidelines for safe recreational water environments. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020 (WHO/HEP/ECH/WSH/2020.8).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 EPA Introductory Comments to the ISSC Fall 2018 Executive Board
    EPA Introductory Comments to the ISSC Fall 2018 Executive Board Meeting 10-17-2018 (Revisions from 5-17-18 in bold italics) EPA, in addition to implementing the Clean Water Act programs for bacterial pathogen standards, monitoring, permits, assessment, total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) and enforcement, is engaged in these topics: 1. Clean Water Act Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Recreational Waters (Swimming) [John Wathen] EPA published final recreational water quality criteria in November 2012. EPA’s implementing guidance discussing alternative enumeration methods, alternative health relationships, and non-human sources of fecal contamination is available at: http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/standards/criteria/health/recreation/index.cfm In May of this year, the EPA released its Five-year Review of the 2012 Recreational Water Quality Criteria (RWQC), as required by the BEACH Act amendments to the Clean Water Act. The review describes the state of the science related to human health protection in water bodies designated for primary contact recreation, such as swimming, since the EPA published the 2012 RWQC. The review report also contains technical assessments which form the basis for the EPA’s decision not to revise the 2012 Recreational Water Criteria during this review cycle. The Agency believes, however, that further research and analysis as identified in this Report will contribute to future EPA review of the 2012 RWQC. The EPA will work with the environmental public health community as it moves forward with its research efforts. The use of qPCR and ongoing research in methods and indicators continue to strengthen and augment the tools available to support the current criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Assessing and Managing Cyanobacterial Risks in Water-Use Systems
    Chapter 6 Assessing and managing cyanobacterial risks in water-use systems Ingrid Chorus and Rory Moses McKeown CONTENTS Introduction 402 6.1 Levels for exerting control over cyanotoxin occurrence and exposure 402 6.2 Water safety planning as a framework for assessing and managing cyanobacterial risks 404 6.2.1 Getting ready for assessment and planning: forming the team 406 6.2.2 Describing the water-use system and its users 409 6.2.2.1 Identifying water users and uses (including sensitive subpopulations) 414 6.2.3 Assessing the risk of cyanotoxin occurrence and the system’s efficacy in controlling it 415 6.2.3.1 Coping with uncertainty 420 6.2.3.2 Cyanotoxin risks in relation to other public health risks from exposure to water 421 6.2.4 Improvement planning: choosing additional cyanotoxin control measures for system improvement 425 6.2.5 Monitoring the functioning of control measures for cyanotoxin management and developing a management plan 426 6.2.6 Verifying that exposure is sufficiently avoided and water quality targets are achieved 429 6.2.7 Documenting the planning process and outcomes 429 6.2.7.1 Documenting management procedures 430 6.2.8 Developing supporting programmes 431 6.2.9 Periodic review and revision 431 References 432 401 402 Toxic Cyanobacteria in Water INTRODUCTION Cyanotoxin occurrence in water to which people may be exposed depends on the extent to which conditions in the respective waterbody favour the proliferation of cyanobacteria. Where barriers (or “control measures”) are in place (e.g., natural, as well as technical treatment or engineered barriers), as well as managerial and planning measures, human exposure will depend on how effectively these measures are working to limit cyanobacterial growth and/or to prevent exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyanotoxins in US Drinking Water: Occurrence, Case Studies and State Approaches to Regulation September 2016
    Cyanotoxins in US Drinking Water: Occurrence, Case Studies and State Approaches to Regulation September 2016 Ideal crop marks Copyright © 2016 American Water Works Association Cyanotoxins in US Drinking Water Occurrence, Case Studies and State Approaches to Regulation September 2016 Copyright ©2016 American Water Works Association. The American Water Works Association is the largest nonprofit, scientific and educational association dedicated to managing and treating water, the world’s most important resource. With approximately 50,000 members, AWWA provides solutions to improve public health, protect the environment, strengthen the economy and enhance our quality of life. This publication was funded by the Water Industry Technical Action Fund managed by AWWA (Project #656). The Water Industry Technical Action Fund is managed by the Water Utility Council to support projects, studies, analyses, reports and presentations in support of AWWA’s legislative and regulatory agenda. WITAF is funded by a portion of every organizational member’s dues. The authors, contributors, editors, and publisher do not assume responsibility for the validity of the content or any consequences of their use. In no event will AWWA or the Water Research Foundation be liable for direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of the use of the information presented in this publication. In particular, AWWA and the Water Research Foundation will not be responsible for any costs, including, but not limited to, those incurred as a result of lost revenue. American Water Works Association Steering Committee 6666 West Quincy Avenue Keith Cartnick, Suez Denver, CO 80235-3098 Ruth Marfil-Vega, American Water 303.794.7711 Dean Reynolds, City of Alliance, OH www.awwa.org AWWA Staff Support Primary Authors Adam Carpenter Environmental Engineering & Technology, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyanotoxin Cylindrospermopsin Producers and the Catalytic Decomposition T Process: a Review
    Harmful Algae 98 (2020) 101894 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Harmful Algae journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/hal Review Cyanotoxin cylindrospermopsin producers and the catalytic decomposition T process: A review. ⁎ Michal Adamskia, , Konrad Wołowskia, Ariel Kaminskib, Alica Hindákovác a Department of Phycology, W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lubicz 46, 31-512 Kraków, Poland b Department of Plant Physiology and Development, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, 30-387 Kraków, Poland c Department of Cryptogams, Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, SK-845 23 Bratislava, Slovak Republic ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Cylindrospermopsin (CYN) is a toxic secondary metabolite produced by several freshwater species of cyano- Cyanobacteria bacteria. Its high chemical stability and wide biological activity pose a series of threats for human and animal Cylindrospermopsin morbidity and mortality. The biggest risk of CYN exposure for human organism comes from the consumption of Cyanotoxins contaminated water, fish or seafood. Very important for effective monitoring of the occurrence of CYNinaquatic Catalytic decomposition environment is accurate identification of cyanobacteria species, that are potentially able to synthesize CYN.In this review we collect data about the discovery of CYN production in cyanobacteria and present the morpho- logical changes between all its producers. Additionally we set together the results describing the catalytic de- composition of CYN. 1. Introduction Moreira et al. 2013, Flores-Rojas et al. 2019). CYN is an alkaloid (C15H21N5O7S; 415.43 Da) with a tricyclic gua- Harmful algal blooms (HABs) occurring all over the world constitute nidine moiety, a sulfate group and a uracil ring (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Algal Bloom Expansion Increases Cyanotoxin Risk in Food Niam M
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications in Food Science and Food Science and Technology Department Technology 2018 Algal Bloom Expansion Increases Cyanotoxin Risk in Food Niam M. Abeysiriwardena Lake Forest College Samuel J. L. Gascoigne Lake Forest College Angela Anandappa University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/foodsciefacpub Part of the Food Science Commons Abeysiriwardena, Niam M.; Gascoigne, Samuel J. L.; and Anandappa, Angela, "Algal Bloom Expansion Increases Cyanotoxin Risk in Food" (2018). Faculty Publications in Food Science and Technology. 262. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/foodsciefacpub/262 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Food Science and Technology Department at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications in Food Science and Technology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. YALE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE 91 (2018), pp.129-142. Review Algal Bloom Expansion Increases Cyanotoxin Risk in Food Niam M. Abeysiriwardenaa,b, Samuel J. L. Gascoignea,c, and Angela Anandappad,e,f,* aNeuroscience Department, Lake Forest College, Lake Forest, IL; bComputer Science, Lake Forest College, Lake Forest, IL; cBiology Department, Lake Forest College, Lake Forest IL; dAlliance for Advanced Sanitation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE; eFood Processing Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE; fDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE As advances in global transportation infrastructure make it possible for out of season foods to be available year-round, the need for assessing the risks associated with the food production and expanded distribution are even more important.
    [Show full text]