DOCSLIB.ORG

Marcia Research Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marcia Research Final Report MARCIA RESEARCH FINAL REPORT May 2018 Prepared for the City of Bunbury By Adam Johnson PhD Candidate, Edith Cowan University Table of Contents Overview of Recommendations ................................................................................................................ 4 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Origins of MARCIA ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Accessible Cities – A Global and National Priority ..................................................................................... 7 Developing the Research Project .............................................................................................................. 8 Introducing the Researchers (Research Group Participants) .................................................................... 9 Principles informing the MARCIA research and recommendations ........................................................ 10 Explanation of the Principles ................................................................................................................... 11 ‘Design’ of community as a major barrier and facilitator to disability access and inclusion .................. 13 Inclusive design ....................................................................................................................................... 15 RESEARCH DATA COLLECTION ................................................................................................................. 17 PROGRESS SINCE MARCIA WAS ADOPTED .............................................................................................. 18 FINDINGS FROM THE RESEARCH ............................................................................................................. 20 FINDING 1: Proficiency in inclusive design .......................................................................................... 20 FINDING 2: Technical support for inclusive design ............................................................................. 22 FINDING 3: Systems and accountability for inclusive design .............................................................. 24 FINDING 4: Involvement of people with disabilities in co-design ....................................................... 26 FINDING 5: Best-practice in inclusive design ....................................................................................... 29 FINDING 6: Addressing existing barriers to disability access .............................................................. 30 RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................................................. 31 RECOMMENDATION 1: Train for inclusive design ............................................................................... 32 RECOMMENDATION 2: Increase technical support for inclusive design ............................................ 33 RECOMMENDATION 3: Improve benchmarks, checklists and accountability for inclusive design ..... 34 RECOMMENDATION 4: Involve people with disabilities as partners in co-design .............................. 36 RECOMMENDATION 5: Promote sharing of best practice in inclusive design .................................... 37 RECOMMENDATION 6: Retrofit to remove existing barriers to community access and inclusion ..... 38 Financial Implications for City of Bunbury .............................................................................................. 39 Discussion the Recommendations: suggestions for implementation ..................................................... 40 DISCUSSION 1: CBD Streetscape Guide ............................................................................................... 40 DISCUSSION 2: Public Open Space Strategy ........................................................................................ 43 DISCUSSION 3: Purchasing and tendering ........................................................................................... 46 DISCUSSION 4: Events.......................................................................................................................... 47 DISCUSSION 5: Development Applications ......................................................................................... 50 MARCIA Research Full Report 2018 2. DISCUSSION 6: Community Engagement ............................................................................................ 52 DISCUSSION 7: Employment of People with Disabilities ..................................................................... 54 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................... 55 Appendices .............................................................................................................................................. 57 MARCIA Research Full Report 2018 3. Overview of Recommendations RECOMMENDATION 1: That the City of Bunbury considers strategies for Train for inclusive design increasing the proficiency of staff members and contractors in the inclusive design of facilities, services and events RECOMMENDATION 2: That the City of Bunbury considers strategies for Increase technical support increasing the availability of technical support for for inclusive design inclusive design to staff, contractors and external organisations involved in the design of facilities, services and events. RECOMMENDATION 3: That the City of Bunbury considers strategies for Improve benchmarks, improving benchmarks, checklists and other checklists & accountability accountability measures related to inclusive design. for inclusive design RECOMMENDATION 4: That businesses, community organisations and the City of Involve people with Bunbury consider joint strategies for promoting the use disabilities as partners in co- of co-design, whereby people with disabilities become actively involved as partners in the design of facilities, design services and events. RECOMMENDATION 5: That businesses, community organisations and the City of Promote sharing of best Bunbury consider joint strategies to promote recognition practice in inclusive design and sharing of best practice in inclusive design. RECOMMENDATION 6: That businesses, community organisations and the City of Retrofit to remove existing Bunbury consider joint strategies for addressing existing barriers to community barriers to disability access and inclusion in Bunbury, created by traditional design practices. access and inclusion Full details regarding each recommendation are contained in the section titled ‘Recommendations’. Note: a one-page summary of the Research Findings can be found in Appendix 3 MARCIA Research Full Report 2018 4. INTRODUCTION MARCIA is a whole-of-community aspiration to make Bunbury the Most Accessible Regional City in Australia, and was adopted by the City of Bunbury in 2014 at the recommendation of their Community Access Committee. The City then partnered with Edith Cowan University to conduct research into the barriers and facilitators to access and inclusion in Bunbury, that could be used to inform the progress of the MARCIA aspiration. This report is the result of a 12-month study conducted by a group of researchers, made up of people with lived experience of disability and facilitated by a PhD student. The researchers spent time analysing the factors impacting on disability access and inclusion in the community, and concluded that most barriers are introduced at the design stage of facilities, services and events. They observed that the product of design was significantly impacted by the quality of the process of design, and the awareness levels of the people responsible for design. The researchers set about identifying key design stakeholders working within one of three types of organisations – Council, businesses and community organisations, and engaged them as participants in the study. The researchers engaged in dialogue with design staff members to gain insight into how the current systems, policies and processes connected to design might allow designers to inadvertently create barriers to access and inclusion, and what safeguards might be embedded into the design process (such as benchmarks, checklists and accountability measures) to improve design outcomes. The researchers also sought to understand how designers might be better supported and equipped to design in ways that eliminate barriers, using principles of ‘inclusive design’. In particular, they looked at what access designers had to training and technical support for inclusive design, and how co-design with people with disabilities might be facilitated to improve the inclusive qualities of design outcomes. This report details the research process and the principles underpinning the research, and outlines the key findings and recommendations. This report also provides some detailed suggestions for how the recommendations might be implemented by the City of Bunbury as the key driver of MARCIA. MARCIA Research Full Report 2018 5. Origins of MARCIA MARCIA was first conceived by the City of Bunbury’s Community Access Committee in 2013 when members of the Committee began to inquire about how Bunbury compared, in terms of disability access and inclusion to other similar-sized regional cities in Western Australia (such as Geraldton, Albany
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PS Ref: 6151 24 September 2019 Chief Executive
    PS Ref: 6151 24 September 2019 Chief Executive Officer City of Bunbury 4 Stephen Street Bunbury WA 6230 Attention: Planning Services PO 6850 Square Cloisters 2709 GPO Box (08) 9227 7970 WA Perth Tce, 251 St Georges 1, Level Dear Sir, PROPOSED LOCAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN LOTS 1, 13, 18, 19 (15) HOLYWELL STREET, LOT 213 (21) HOLYWELL STREET AND LOT 20 (30) & 180 (180) JARVIS STREET, SOUTH BUNBURY Planning Solutions acts on behalf of Croft Developments Pty Ltd in support of a proposed Local Development Plan (LDP) for Lots 1, 13, 18, 19 (15) Holywell Street, Lot 213 (21) Holywell Street Planning Solutions (Aust) Pty Ltd 184 184 ABN 23 143 573 143 573 ACN www.planningsolutions.com.au [email protected] and Lot 20 (30) & Lot 180 (180) Jarvis Street, South Bunbury, excepting those portions of Lots 19 and 213 on the western side of the Five Mile Brook drain (subject site). This application is made in accordance with Part 6 of Schedule 2 (Deemed Provisions) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015. This application was originally lodged with the City on 27 August 2019. Following feedback from the City’s officers, the LDP has been amended. This submission incorporates the justification provided in the original application, modified to reflect the amendments made to the LDP. The following information sets out the background, details of the site, a description of the proposed LDP and a brief description of the proposed LDP and associated provisions. 1 BACKGROUND The subject site is located within the municipality of the City.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-21 Coastal Grant Recipients
    2020-21 COASTAL GRANT RECIPIENTS Recipient Project Description Grant Amt Grant Karajarri Traditional Karajarri Coastal Planning for tourism areas around Port $31,000 Coastwest Land Association Tourism Zone Smith Tourism Precinct, and installation Infrastructure Project of boardwalks and tourism shelters in key locations to support and manage human impacts and increasing tourism pressures. City of Greater Separation Point Providing resilience to the beach and $16,900 Coastwest Geraldton Coastal Dune dunes through a combination of Management stabilisation, fencing, and access way formalisation. City of Greater Cape Burney Lookout Improving dune resilience through a $7,500 Coastwest Geraldton Dune Rehabilitation combination of dune stabilisation, access management and sturdy sand trapping fencing. Shire of Gingin Gingin Coastal Hazard Integration of information from the $52,900 Coastal Risk Management and recently completed Inundation Study Management Adaptation Plan and into the Shire's Coastal Hazard Risk Plan Inundation Study Management and Adaptation Plan Assistance Integration (CHRMAP) to deliver an updated and Program holistic approach to coastal management within the Shire of Gingin. Northern Building community A project to reverse a steady downturn $19,400 Coastwest Agricultural capacity in the Northern in coastal community capacity by Catchments Agricultural Region expanding existing community forums; Council. developing online curriculum-based material for schools; and updating and revamping an existing Coastcare Resource to be more relevant for the Coastcare community. Friends of North Oc Conservation, A continuation of previous work aimed $16,780 Coastwest ean Reef- Restoration, Education at conserving, restoring and protecting Iluka Foreshore - Bush Forever 325 the biodiversity of the northern end of Iluka Foreshore Bush Forever site 325.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Emergency Management Arrangements Version 1.1 Page 1 of 73 Page Intentionally Left Blank
    Shire of Capel Local Emergency Management Arrangements Version 1.1 Page 1 of 73 Page intentionally left blank Shire of Capel Local Emergency Management Arrangements Version 1.1 Page 2 of 73 Contents Certificate of Approval ........................................................................................................................ 6 Version Control ................................................................................................................................... 7 Disclaimer............................................................................................................................................ 8 Amendment Record ............................................................................................................................ 9 Distribution List ................................................................................................................................. 10 PART 1 – Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 11 Authority ........................................................................................................................................... 11 Endorsement Date ............................................................................................................................ 11 Area Covered .................................................................................................................................... 11 Profile ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WABN Grants Program: Awarded Projects 2020-21
    * Some totals includes 2021-22 committed funding. Project locations are diagrammatic only. Regional Projects SEE TABLE BELOW FOR DETAILS $200,000 $514,820* $10,000 West Swan Rd Shared Path 3 Projects City of Swan Kimberley Region Whitfords Ave Shared Path Design City of Joondalup Indian Ocean $15,000 Hudson Ave / Girrawheen Ave / Wade Ct Shared Path Design City of Wanneroo $481,158* $20,000 2 Projects Quintilian Rd Shared Path Design Pilbara Region City of Nedlands $10,000 $110,000 $175,000 School Sport Circuit Feasibility High Wycombe Selby Street Shared Path City of Nedlands Connection to and Signals Improvement Forrestfield WESTERN Town of Cambridge Train Station AUSTRALIA $90,750 City of Kalamunda Eucla St to Glendalough Train Station Shared Path $150,000 City of Vincent Brockway Rd Shared Path $238,998* City of Nedlands 4 Projects $317,500* Berkshire Rd / Dundas Rd Mid West Region $335,000 Shared Path $47,500 Cannington to City of Kalamunda $937,437* Jeff Joseph Reserve Willetton Shared Path $18,000 Shared Path Design and Footbridge 14 Projects City of Canning Hale Rd to Dawson Ave Wheatbelt Region City of Melville Cycling Route Design City of Kalamunda SEE METRO MAP $242,500 1 Project Goldfields Esperance Region $67,500 $732,500* $210,000 Murdoch Dr Railway Pde Shared Path 2 Projects Shared Path Design William St to Ladywell St $1,181,885* Great Southern Region City of Melville City of Gosnells 10 Projects $45,000 South West Region The Crescent Shared Path Design [email protected] 16 March 2018; Plan No:9019202
    [Show full text]
  • Place and Community Plan) Annual Budget (1-Year) Measurement and Reporting
    P L A C E A N D C O M M U N I T Y P L A N 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 3 0 The Shire of Dardanup acknowledges the Noongar people as the traditional owners of the land upon which the Shire is situated. In doing this, we recognise and respect their continuing culture and contribution they make to the life of this region and pay our respects to their elders, past, present and emerging. Introduction The community services that local government Plan. It reflects the current and changing provide are essential for social outcomes for needs of our community with a focus on our existing community and when attracting place-based community development and new people to the Shire. The Place and the empowerment of individuals, groups and Community Plan (The Plan) seeks to guide clubs. Through the implementation of the the priority programs, projects, and initiatives Plan, the Shire will continue to provide positive that the Place and Community team seek to social outcomes by creating a safe, healthy deliver over the coming 10-year period in- and vibrant community which is inclusive and line with the Shire’s Strategic Community welcoming for all ages and interests. Our Community Infographic: AUSTRALIAN BUREAU OF STATISTICS 2016 Census of Population and Housing The Shire of Dardanup spans over 525.8 people per household (3 and 2.9 respectively), square kilometers comprising of urban areas, lower median age (29 and 35 respectively), commercial and industrial development, and highest percentage of children aged 0 – townships surrounded by rural farming, 14 years at over 28% of the total population vineyards and tourism, and State forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Australia: a Small Area Perspective
    ......................................................................F E A T U R E A R T I C L E – Western Australia: A Small Area Perspective INTRODUCTION Western Australia occupies the western third of the Australian continent, comprising a land area of about 2,529,880 square kilometres. The administration of the urban and regional areas of this large and diverse State is divided amongst 142 local government authorities; nine development commissions; and a number of State and Commonwealth government departments and organisations. The demand for information relating to small geographic areas (such as Local Government Areas — LGAs) and broader regions (such as development commission regions) continues to increase. The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) is committed to identifying and disseminating social, economic and environmental data for small areas to assist governments and communities seeking to enhance local and regional well–being in an environmentally sustainable way. The results of this on–going data gathering from ABS and non–ABS information sources are compiled and available in the ABS' Western Australian Regional Profiles, more details of which are provided on page 26, and through the Integrated Regional Data Base, details of which are available on the ABS website at www.abs.gov.au (select Products & Services/Key Products). This article presents selected social and economic data for LGAs from the 2002 Regional Profiles to provide a mosaic of social and economic life in urban and regional Western Australia. A significant proportion of the social data has been drawn from the 2001 Census of Population and Housing. The Census is the most comprehensive source of information about the characteristics of people in Australia and the dwellings in which they live.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconciliation Action Plan
    Reconciliation Action Plan This document was developed through a collaborative approach between officers from the City of Bunbury and the Shires of Capel, Dardanup and Harvey, the South West Development Commission, Edith Cowan University and representatives from the Gnaala Karla Booja and South West Boojarah native title areas. We thank all those involved for their support and enthusiasm in its development and look forward to continued collaboration with our communities for the implementation of actions and deliverables. Contents Foreword 1 RAPRG Foreword 2 Local Government Authorities Vision 3 No Community without Unity 4 Mission 5 Values 6 Our Business 7 Our RAP 8 Our RAP Journey 9 Our Country 10 One Year - Six Seasons 11 RAP Actions and Deliverables 13 Relationships 13 Respect 14 Opportunities 15 Governence and Tracking 16 Reconciliation Action Plan Reference Group (RAPRG) The Reconciliation Action Plan Reference Group Foreword (RAPRG) is proud of the work that has been undertaken to develop this Reconciliation Action Plan (RAP). This was a truly collaborative approach between officers from the City of Bunbury and the Shires of Capel, Dardanup and Harvey, the South West Development Commission, Edith Cowan University and representatives from the Gnaala Karla Booja and the South West Boojarah native title areas. This approach will support these communities as they continue on their future journey towards reconciliation. If you would like to be involved as a RAPRG member for the implementation of projects planned for your area, we would encourage you to contact the relevant local government authority to express your interest. 1 Local Government Authorities (LGAs) A RAP provides an opportunity for communities to The combined local government authorities of turn good intentions into real actions and rises to Bunbury, Capel, Dardanup and Harvey are pleased the challenge of reconciling Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Bunbury-Harvey Regional Council Exit Meeting Agenda
    Appendix 1 BUNBURY-HARVEY REGIONAL COUNCIL EXIT MEETING AGENDA 28 November 2019 4pm Shire of Harvey Offices, 7 Mulgara Street, Australind ATTENDEES: The Audit Committee Members: Cr Jaysen Miguel Councillor City of Bunbury Cr Tresslyn Smith Councillor City of Bunbury Cr Karen Turner Councillor City of Bunbury Cr Tania Jackson Councillor Shire of Harvey Cr Bill Adams Councillor Shire of Harvey Support Staff/Visitors: Mr Tony Battersby Chief Executive Officer Bunbury-Harvey Regional Council Ms Annie Riordan Chief Executive Officer Shire of Harvey Mr Malcolm Osborne Chief Executive Officer City of Bunbury Mr Dave Chandler Director Strategy and City of Bunbury Organisational Performance Mr David Ransom Manager Finance City of Bunbury Mr Chris Welham Accountant Bunbury-Harvey Regional Council AMD Chartered Accountants: Emily McKelvie Client Advisor Office of the Auditor General (via phone conference): Carly Meagher Director, Financial Audit Office of the Auditor General AGENDA ITEMS: 1. Audit Approach Refer also attached Audit Planning Summary Dated May 2019, including Section 5 “Significant Risks” and Section 6 “Audit Emphasis and Significant Account Balances” • Interim Visit / Testing Completed • Year End Communications • Final Visit / Testing Completed 2. Variations to Audit Plan (where applicable) No variations 3. Subsequent Events Discussion and reconfirmation regarding subsequent events. 4. Audit Issues • Status of prior year audit issues and 2019 interim audit: Prior year audit issues and 2019 interim recommendations implemented with exception of: Purchase Orders Dated After Invoice and Missing Leave Forms. • Audit issues reported in the current audit: As reported within ‘ Findings Identified during Final Audit’ document attached. Appendix 1 5. Audit Report Refer DRAFT Audit Report attached • Opinion Qualification Matters: No qualifications to audit opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Busselton
    Our Ref: Contact: Naomi Searle 14 May 2019 Presiding Commissioner Australian Productivity Commission GPO Box 1428 CANBERRA ACT 2601 Email: [email protected] Dear Mr Coppel Productivity Commission Review of Remote Area Tax Concessions and Payments The City of Busselton would like to formally acknowledge the significant and positive economic and social benefits that Rio Tinto provides not only to the City of Busselton but also to the wider South West Region of Western Australia. Rio Tinto employs approximately 1000 Fly in Fly out workers who reside in the City of Busselton, with 800 of those employees flying directly to Pilbara mine sites through the Busselton Margaret River Airport. Further Rio Tinto employs local residents who live in the following, surrounding Local Government Areas and either fly directly in/ out of the Busselton Margaret River Airport or travel to Perth Airport; City of Bunbury Shire of Capel Shire of Augusta Margaret River Shire of Nannup Shire of Manjimup The City acknowledges Rio Tinto as a critical employer within the region and our local community has obtained significant benefits from the FIFO program, which offers lifestyle choices whilst providing regional economies with expanded and diversified work opportunities. Rio Tinto has also entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the City of Busselton to work collaboratively on community and sponsorship initiatives including apprenticeship and youth services program and works directly with our local residents and organisations to provide support on a number of levels. The City of Busselton offers a variety of lifestyle choices with excellent educational and health facilities and the City’s future growth and sustainability is linked directly to our ability to attract and retain residents and families which in turn creates local employment and economic growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 4: References & Appendices
    Landscape Character Study Part 4: References & Appendices 4.1 Reference Material 4.2 Appendices Bunbury 4:185 Landscape Character Study References 4.1 Reference Material Bunbury Heritage Planning Committee, Bunbury Heritage Trail, W.A. Heritage Committee, 1988. Considine & Griffiths Architects Pty Ltd & Chinnery, R 2004, Investigation of the Tree Street Heritage Area, Bunbury Stage 1, City of Bunbury, Western Australia. GHD Pty Ltd, Bunbury Integrated Land Use & Transport Vision 2030, Perth, Western Australia, 2006. GHD & SJB Town Planning 2001, City of Bunbury Housing Strategy, City of Bunbury, Western Australia. Heritage and Conservation Professionals, Chris Antill Planning & Urban Design, City of Bunbury, East Bunbury Heritage Area Study, 2009. John Mongard Landscape Architects, Gold Coast City Landscape Strategy, Brisbane, QLD, 2000. Staines, J & Parker, G 2001, City of Bunbury Municipal Inventory, City of Bunbury, Western Australia. Western Australian Planning Commission, 1995, Bunbury-Wellington Region Plan, Bunbury, Western Australia. Western Australian Planning Commission 2006, Designing Out Crime Planning Guidelines, Perth, Western Australia. Western Australian Planning Commission 1998, Development Control Policy DC 2.6 - Residential Road Planning, Perth Western Australia. Western Australian Planning Commission, 2000, Greater Bunbury Region Scheme Environmental Review, Perth, Western Australia. Western Australian Planning Commission 2004, Liveable Neighbourhoods Edition 3, Perth, Western Australia. Western Australian Planning Commission 2007, Liveable Neighbourhoods, Perth, Western Australia. Western Australian Planning Commission 2003, State Planning Policy No 2: Environment and Natural Resources, Perth, Western Australia. Western Australian Planning Commission 2008, State Planning Policy No 3.1: Residential Design Codes, Perth, Western Australia. Western Australian Planning Commission 2004, State Planning Policy No 5.2: Telecommunications Infrastructure, Perth, Western Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Australian Planning Commission, Albert Facey House, 469 Wellington Street, Perth Western Australia 6000
    Western Australian Al Planning Commission March 2010 Greater Bunbury Region Scheme Amendment 0004/41 Capel East Report on Submissions and Submissions Shire of Capel GOVERNMENT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA Greater Bunbury Region Scheme Amendment 0004/41 Capel East Report on Submissions Submissions Shire of Capel A Western Australian Planning )o. Commission March 2010 © State of Western Australia Published by the Western Australian Planning Commission, Albert Facey House, 469 Wellington Street, Perth Western Australia 6000 GBRS Amendment 0004/41 Report on Submissions and Submissions File RLS/0037/1 Published March 2010 ISBN 0 7309 9956 4 Internet: http://www.planning.wa.gov.au e-mail: corporate @planning.wa.gov.au Phone: (08) 9264 7777 Fax: (08)92647566 TTY: (08)92647535 Copies of this document are available in alternative formats on application to the disability services co-ordinator. Introduction to Greater Bunbury Region Scheme major amendments The Greater Bunbury Region Scheme (GBRS) sets out the broad pattern of land use for the whole Greater Bunbury region. The Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) is responsible for keeping the GBRS under review and initiating changes to best reflect regional planning and development needs where they are seen as necessary. An amendment proposal to change land use reservations and zones in the GBRS is regulated by the Planning and Development Act 2005. That legislation provides for public submissions to be made on proposed amendments. For a substantial amendment, often referred to as a major amendment (made under section 41of the Act), the WAPC considers allthe submissions lodged, and publishesits recommendations in a report on submissions. This report is presented to the Minister for Planning and to the Governor for approval.
    [Show full text]
  • Successful Applicants in the Latest Round of Graffiti Grants
    Successful applicants in the latest round of graffiti grants: Approved Applicant Project Title Project Description Amount City of Bunbury Graffiti Rapid To purchase a specialised g raffiti trailer and equipment $19,990 Removal used to remove graffiti. Shire of Cunderdin Cunderdin Anti- To purchase exit tag graffiti remover and anti- graffiti $4,695 Graffiti Project coating. City of Kalgoorlie- Airless Mobile Spray To purchase an airless mobile spray unit to assist the $7,900 Boulder Unit city’s graffiti buster team and community groups to clean up graffiti in the city. The unit will provide the graffiti buster team with the ability to paint over offending and racist graffiti very quickly. The system provides lots of paint in a very short time to an area. It is also extremely accurate in its delivery, enabling the operator to place covering to a fine edge. Midland PCYC PCYC Graffiti To continue to employ a youth worker/mentor who $18,392 Removal Program engages well with the young people providing mentoring and counselling to reduce graffiti. They will retain the services of this person to work in partnership with the police officer -in-charge of Midland PCYC. Midland PCYC graffiti removal program is the only program dealing with Juvenile Justice Teams (JJT) referrals of young people to a graffiti program. JJT referrals require one-on-one supervision and mentoring. City of Rockingham Rapid Removal For Purchase g raffiti removal equipment, paints and safety $17,269 Rockingham equipment. Residents City of Stirling Wipe Out Graffiti To purchase graffiti removal equipment, provide $20,000 training for volunteers and deliver a Wipeout Graffiti Education Program.
    [Show full text]