MANUAL Polyrate 2016-2A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MANUAL Polyrate 2016-2A MANUAL Polyrate 2016-2A Jingjing Zheng, Junwei Lucas Bao, Rubén Meana-Pañeda, Shuxia Zhang, Benjamin J. Lynch, José C. Corchado, Yao-Yuan Chuang, Patton L. Fast, Wei-Ping Hu, Yi-Ping Liu, Gillian C. Lynch, Kiet A. Nguyen, Charles F. Jackels, Antonio Fernandez Ramos, Benjamin A. Ellingson, Vasilios S. Melissas, Jordi Villà, Ivan Rossi, Elena. L. Coitiño, Jingzhi Pu, Titus V. Albu Department of Chemistry Chemical Theory Center, and Supercomputing Institute University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 Artur Ratkiewicz Institute of Chemistry University of Bialystok, Poland Rozeanne Steckler Northwest Alliance for Computational Science & Engineering Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 Bruce C. Garrett Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352 Alan D. Isaacson Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056 and Donald G. Truhlar Department of Chemistry, Chemical Theory Center, and Supercomputing Institute University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 Program version: 2016-2A Program version date: Nov. 29, 2016 Manual version date: Nov. 29, 2016 Copyright 1989 – 2016 Executive summary: Polyrate is a computer program for the calculation of chemical reaction rates of polyatomic species (and also atoms and diatoms as special cases) by variational transition state theory (VTST); conventional transition state theory is also supported. Bimolecular and unimolecular reactions and gas-phase, solid-state, and gas-solid-interface reactions are all included. Polyrate can perform variational transition state theory (VTST) calculations on reactions with both tight and loose transition states. For tight transition states it uses reaction-path (RP) variational transition state theory of Garret and Truhlar, and for loose transition states it uses variable-reaction-coordinate (VRC) variational transition state theory of Georgievskii and Klippenstein. For RP calculations there are Sept. 3, 2016 POLYRATE–V2016 1 options to use curvilinear coordinates along a minimum energy path or a variationally optimized reaction path and to add multidimensional tunneling contributions by means of a transmission coefficient; the treatment of loose transition states is based on variable- reaction-coordinate VTST with single-faceted and multifaceted dividing surfaces. The methods used for tight transition states are conventional transition state theory, canonical variational transition state theory (CVT), and microcanonical variational transition state theory ( µVT) with multidimensional semiclassical approximations for tunneling and nonclassical reflection. The tunneling approximations available are zero- curvature tunneling (ZCT), small-curvature tunneling (SSCT), large-curvature- tunneling (LCT), and optimized multidimensional tunneling (OMT). The SCT option is the centrifugal dominant semiclassical adiabatic ground-state tunneling, and the LCT options include both LC3 and LC4 including tunneling into excited states. One may also treat specific vibrational states of selected modes with translational, rotational, and other vibrational modes treated thermally. Pressure-dependent rate constants for elementary reactions can be computed using system-specific quantum RRK theory (SS-QRRK) with the information obtained from high-pressure-limit VTST calculation as input by using the SS-QRRK utility code. The SS-QRRK utility program is part of the POLYRATE distribution, and its usage is described in a separate manual. For tight transition states, several options are available for reaction paths, vibrations transverse to the reaction path, and transition state dividing surfaces. Reaction paths may be calculated by the Euler steepest-descent, Euler stabilization, Page-McIver, or variational reaction path algorithms. Vibrations away from the reaction path may be defined by rectilinear, nonredundant curvilinear, or redundant curvilinear coordinates. Generalized-transition-state dividing surfaces may be defined on the basis of gradient directions or by the re-orientation of the dividing surface algorithm. Vibrational frequencies may be scaled or unscaled. For loose transition states, rate constants may be calculated for canonical or microcanonical ensembles or energy and total angular momentum resolved microcanonical ensembles. For loose transition states in barrierless association reactions, single-faceted or multifaceted dividing surfaces based on a variable reaction coordinate are used. Potential energy surfaces may be analytic functions evaluated by subroutines, or they may be implicit surfaces defined by electronic structure input files containing energies, gradients, and force constants (Hessians) at selected points on a reaction path. The use of electronic structure calculations to calculate rate constants or other dynamical quantities without an analytic potential energy surface is called direct dynamics. Analytic surfaces may be used for variational transition state theory and any of the types of tunneling calculations, single-level and dual-level calculations based solely on electronic structure input files may be used for variational transition state theory and zero-curvature or small-curvature tunneling, and dual-level calculations based on using an analytic potential energy surface as the lower level and using an electronic structure Sept. 3, 2016 POLYRATE–V2016 2 input file as the higher level may be used for variational transition state theory and any of the types of tunneling calculations. Polyrate supports six options for direct dynamics, namely (i) straight single-level direct dynamics, (ii) zero-order interpolated variational transition state theory (IVTST-0), (iii) first-order interpolated variational transition state theory (IVTST-1), (iv) interpolated variational transition state theory by mapping (IVTST-M), (v) variational transition state theory with interpolated single-point energies (VTST-ISPE), and (vi) variational transition state theory with interpolated optimized corrections (VTST-IOC). VTST-IOC and VTST-ISPE are examples of dual-level direct dynamics; and VTST-IOC is also called triple-slash dynamics (///), where the triple slash denotes higher-order corrections of the geometries at which energetic and Hessian corrections are calculated. Dual-level methods may be applied with electronic structure data for both levels (dual-level direct dynamics), or it may be applied with an analytical potential energy surface for the lower level and electronic structure data for the higher level. When dual-level methods are employed with electronic structure data for both levels, the lower level may be either straight direct dynamics or IVTST-M. This version of Polyrate contains 112 test runs, and 46 of these are for direct dynamics calculations; 85 of the test runs are single-level runs, and 27 are dual-level calculations. Polyrate is designed to be used in conjunction with interfaces to electronic structure calculations for direct dynamics. Currently the following interfaces are available: Electronic structure package Interface CHARMM with CHARMMRATE CRATE GAMESS (or with GAMESSPLUS) GAMESSPLUSRATE GAUSSIAN 09/GAUSSIAN 03 GAUSSRATE JAGUAR JAGUARATE MC-TINKER MC-TINKERATE MORATE MOPAC MULTILEVEL MULTILEVELRATE NWCHEM NWCHEMRATE Sept. 3, 2016 POLYRATE–V2016 3 CONTENTS TITLE PAGE AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................1 CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................... 4 MANUAL ........................................................................................................................................ 1 PART I GENERAL INFORMATION ....................................................................................... 13 1. INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................13 2. REFERENCES ...............................................................................................................22 2.A. RECOMMENDED CITATION AND OTHER Polyrate REFERENCES ...........22 2.B. REFERENCES FOR INCORPORATED CODE ..................................................23 3. AVAILABILITY AND LICENSING ............................................................................24 4. POLYRATE SPECIFICS ....................................................................................................25 4.A. Polyrate authors .....................................................................................................25 4.B. Hardware platforms ................................................................................................27 4.C. Compiler versions ..................................................................................................30 5. PROGRAM AND MANUAL DESCRIPTION .............................................................33 5.A. Code description, portability, and special files ......................................................33 5.B. Description of the manual ......................................................................................33 5.B.1. Referencing conventions .................................................................................34 5.B.2. Book chapters ..................................................................................................35 PART II THEORY BACKGROUND AND CALCULATION DETAILS ON RP-VTST .... 36 6. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND ON RP-VTST .........................................................36
Recommended publications
  • Documento Tecnico Sobre Sgi Altix 3000 Para Universidad Politecnica De Valencia
    DOCUMENTO TECNICO SOBRE SGI ALTIX 3000 PARA UNIVERSIDAD POLITECNICA DE VALENCIA Mayo 2003 SGI Pza. Descubridor Diego de Ordás 3 Edificio Santa Engracia 120 28003 MADRID 1 de 83 INDICE Capítulo/Sección Página 1 ANEXO TÉCNICO A: DESCRIPCIÓN DE LA ARQUITECTURA EMPLEADA EN LA FAMILIA SGI ALTIX 3000....................................................4 1.1 ARQUITECTURA SGI ALTIX 3000...............................................................5 1.1.1 DISTRIBUCIÓN DE MEMORIA.............................................................5 1.1.2 LATENCIA DE ACCESO A MEMORIA..................................................5 1.1.3 COHERENCIA DE CACHÉ....................................................................5 1.1.4 TIPO DE PARALELISMO.......................................................................5 1.1.5 TOPOLOGIA...........................................................................................5 1.1.5.1 RED DE INTERCONEXIÓN ........................................................................5 2 ANEXO TÉCNICO B: EL SUPERCLUSTER SGI ALTIX 3000 ....................5 2.1 INTRODUCCIÓN ............................................................................................5 2.2 MÓDULOS O BRICKS.....................................................................................5 2.2.1 CPU BRICK ITANIUM 2 (C-BRICK) .....................................................5 2.2.1.1 PROCESADOR INTEL® ITANIUM® 2 MCKINLEY..................................5 2.2.1.2 PROCESADOR INTEL® ITANIUM® 2 MADISON. ....................................5
    [Show full text]
  • AVS on UNIX WORKSTATIONS INSTALLATION/ RELEASE NOTES
    _________ ____ AVS on UNIX WORKSTATIONS INSTALLATION/ RELEASE NOTES ____________ Release 5.5 Final (50.86 / 50.88) November, 1999 Advanced Visual Systems Inc.________ Part Number: 330-0120-02 Rev L NOTICE This document, and the software and other products described or referenced in it, are con®dential and proprietary products of Advanced Visual Systems Inc. or its licensors. They are provided under, and are subject to, the terms and conditions of a written license agreement between Advanced Visual Systems and its customer, and may not be transferred, disclosed or otherwise provided to third parties, unless oth- erwise permitted by that agreement. NO REPRESENTATION OR OTHER AFFIRMATION OF FACT CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION STATEMENTS REGARDING CAPACITY, PERFORMANCE, OR SUI- TABILITY FOR USE OF SOFTWARE DESCRIBED HEREIN, SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE A WARRANTY BY ADVANCED VISUAL SYSTEMS FOR ANY PURPOSE OR GIVE RISE TO ANY LIABILITY OF ADVANCED VISUAL SYSTEMS WHATSOEVER. ADVANCED VISUAL SYSTEMS MAKES NO WAR- RANTY OF ANY KIND IN OR WITH REGARD TO THIS DOCUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PUR- POSE. ADVANCED VISUAL SYSTEMS SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ERRORS THAT MAY APPEAR IN THIS DOCUMENT AND SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMI- TATION INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS DOCUMENT OR THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN IT, EVEN IF ADVANCED VISUAL SYSTEMS HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. The speci®cations and other information contained in this document for some purposes may not be com- plete, current or correct, and are subject to change without notice.
    [Show full text]
  • IRIX® Admin System Configuration and Operation
    IRIX® Admin System Configuration and Operation 007-2859-017 COPYRIGHT © 1992-2001 Silicon Graphics, Inc. All rights reserved; provided portions may be copyright in third parties, as indicated elsewhere herein. No permission is granted to copy, distribute, or create derivative works from the contents of this electronic documentation in any manner, in whole or in part, without the prior written permission of Silicon Graphics, Inc. LIMITED RIGHTS LEGEND The electronic (software) version of this document was developed at private expense; if acquired under an agreement with the USA government or any contractor thereto, it is acquired as "commercial computer software" subject to the provisions of its applicable license agreement, as specified in (a) 48 CFR 12.212 of the FAR; or, if acquired for Department of Defense units, (b) 48 CFR 227-7202 of the DoD FAR Supplement; or sections succeeding thereto. Contractor/manufacturer is Silicon Graphics, Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy 2E, Mountain View, CA 94043-1351. TRADEMARKS AND ATTRIBUTIONS Challenge, Indigo, IRIS, IRIX, Octane, and Onyx are registered trademarks and SGI, Crimson, Indigo2, IRIS FailSafe, IRIS InSight, IRIS WorkSpace, IRIX Networker, NUMAlink, Origin, Performance Co-Pilot, Power Challenge, Power Indigo2, Power Onyx, the SGI logo, and XFS are trademarks of Silicon Graphics, Inc. Indy is a registered trademark, used under license in the United States and owned by Silicon Graphics, Inc., in other countries worldwide. Centronics is a trademark of Centronics Data Computer Corporation. Cray is a registered trademark of Cray, Inc. Documenter’s Workbench is a trademark of Novell, Inc. FrameMaker, Illustrator, and PostScript are trademarks of Adobe Systems, Incorporated.
    [Show full text]
  • IRIX® Admin: System Configuration and Operation
    IRIX® Admin: System Configuration and Operation 007-2859-021 COPYRIGHT © 1992-2003 Silicon Graphics, Inc. All rights reserved; provided portions may be copyright in third parties, as indicated elsewhere herein. No permission is granted to copy, distribute, or create derivative works from the contents of this electronic documentation in any manner, in whole or in part, without the prior written permission of Silicon Graphics, Inc. LIMITED RIGHTS LEGEND The electronic (software) version of this document was developed at private expense; if acquired under an agreement with the USA government or any contractor thereto, it is acquired as "commercial computer software" subject to the provisions of its applicable license agreement, as specified in (a) 48 CFR 12.212 of the FAR; or, if acquired for Department of Defense units, (b) 48 CFR 227-7202 of the DoD FAR Supplement; or sections succeeding thereto. Contractor/manufacturer is Silicon Graphics, Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy 2E, Mountain View, CA 94043-1351. TRADEMARKS AND ATTRIBUTIONS Silicon Graphics, SGI, the SGI logo, Challenge, Indigo, IRIS, IRIX, Octane, Onyx, and Origin are registered trademarks and Crimson, Indigo2, IRIS FailSafe, IRIS InSight, IRIS WorkSpace, IRIX Networker, NUMAlink, Performance Co-Pilot, Power Challenge, Power Indigo2, Power Onyx, and XFS are trademarks of Silicon Graphics, Inc., in the United States and/or other countries worldwide. Indy is a registered trademark, used under license in the United States and owned by Silicon Graphics, Inc., in other countries worldwide. Centronics is a trademark of GENICOM, L.L. C. Cray is a registered trademark of Cray, Inc. Documenter’s Workbench is a trademark of Novell, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 - Graphics Programming with JOGL
    Chapter 2 - Graphics Programming with JOGL • Graphics Software: Classification and History • JOGL Hello World Program • 2D Coordinate Systems in JOGL • Dealing with Window Reshaping • 3D Coordinate Systems in JOGL LMU München – Medieninformatik – Heinrich Hussmann – Computergrafik 1 – SS2012 – Kapitel 2 1 Software Using Graphics • Graphics is always finally rendered by hardware: – Monitor, projector, head-mounted display, (2D/3D) printer, plotter, vehicle … • Special-purpose software packages: – Dedicated to a special application area – Based on general graphics software as lower layers – User may need high geometrical skills in some cases, but principles of graphics programming are hidden from user – Examples: CAD software, architectural software, medical software • General-purpose graphics software: – Typically libraries or frameworks to be used for construction of other software – Defines a “computer graphics application programming interface” (CG API) – Exist on various abstraction levels – Can be bound to various programming languages (mostly used: C++) LMU München – Medieninformatik – Heinrich Hussmann – Computergrafik 1 – SS2012 – Kapitel 2 2 Low-Level and High-Level CG APIs • Low-Level APIs – Provide functionality for constructing and rendering (3D) graphical views – Abstracts away from concrete graphics hardware (existence and size of buffers, hardware support for certain functionality) – Targets at hardware-supported execution – Dominant examples: OpenGL (open standard), Direct3D (Microsoft) • High-Level APIs – Provide further
    [Show full text]
  • Performance of Various Computers Using Standard Linear Equations Software
    ———————— CS - 89 - 85 ———————— Performance of Various Computers Using Standard Linear Equations Software Jack J. Dongarra* Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN 37996-1301 Computer Science and Mathematics Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN 37831 University of Manchester CS - 89 - 85 June 15, 2014 * Electronic mail address: [email protected]. An up-to-date version of this report can be found at http://www.netlib.org/benchmark/performance.ps This work was supported in part by the Applied Mathematical Sciences subprogram of the Office of Energy Research, U.S. Department of Energy, under Contract DE-AC05-96OR22464, and in part by the Science Alliance a state supported program at the University of Tennessee. 6/15/2014 2 Performance of Various Computers Using Standard Linear Equations Software Jack J. Dongarra Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN 37996-1301 Computer Science and Mathematics Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN 37831 University of Manchester June 15, 2014 Abstract This report compares the performance of different computer systems in solving dense systems of linear equations. The comparison involves approximately a hundred computers, ranging from the Earth Simulator to personal computers. 1. Introduction and Objectives The timing information presented here should in no way be used to judge the overall performance of a computer system. The results reflect only one problem area: solving dense systems of equations. This report provides performance information on a wide assortment of computers ranging from the home-used PC up to the most powerful supercomputers. The information has been collected over a period of time and will undergo change as new machines are added and as hardware and software systems improve.
    [Show full text]
  • SGI® L1 and L2 Controller Software User's Guide
    SGI® L1 and L2 Controller Software User’s Guide 007-3938-003 CONTRIBUTORS Written by Linda Rae Sande Revised by Francisco Razo and Terry Schultz Illustrated by Dan Young Production by Karen Jacobson Engineering contributions by Don Adams, Michael T. Brown, Dick Brownell, Jason Chang, Steve Hein, Jill Heitpas, Nancy Heller, Matt Hoy, Hao Pham, Craig Schultz, and Lisa Steinmetz. COPYRIGHT © 2002, 2003, 2004 Silicon Graphics, Inc. All rights reserved; provided portions may be copyright in third parties, as indicated elsewhere herein. No permission is granted to copy, distribute, or create derivative works from the contents of this electronic documentation in any manner, in whole or in part, without the prior written permission of Silicon Graphics, Inc. LIMITED RIGHTS LEGEND The software described in this document is “commercial computer software” provided with restricted rights (except as to included open/free source) as specified in the FAR 52.227-19 and/or the DFAR 227.7202, or successive sections. Use beyond license provisions is a violation of worldwide intellectual property laws, treaties and conventions. This document is provided with limited rights as defined in 52.227-14. TRADEMARKS AND ATTRIBUTIONS Silicon Graphics, SGI, the SGI logo, Altix, Onyx, and Origin are registered trademarks and Fuei, NUMAflex, NUMAlink, and SGIconsole are trademarks of Silicon Graphics, Inc., in the U.S. and/or other countries worldwide. New Features in This Guide This manual has been updated with information to support the SGI Altix 350 system. Major Documentation Changes The following sections were revised for this release: • Added information about SGI Altix 350 system hardware manuals to “Related Publications” on page xix.
    [Show full text]
  • Opengl® on Silicon Graphics® Systems
    OpenGL® on Silicon Graphics® Systems About This Guide What This Guide Contains What You Should Know Before Reading This Guide Background Reading OpenGL and Associated Tools and Libraries X Window System: Xlib, X Toolkit, and OSF/Motif Other Sources Conventions Used in This Guide Typographical Conventions Function Naming Conventions Changes in this Version of the Manual Chapter 1 OpenGL on Silicon Graphics Systems Using OpenGL With the X Window System GLX Extension to the X Window System Libraries, Tools, Toolkits, and Widget Sets Note to IRIS GL Users Extensions to OpenGL Debugging and Performance Optimization Debugging Your Program Tuning Your OpenGL Application Maximizing Performance With IRIS Performer Location of Example Source Code Chapter 2 OpenGL and X: Getting Started Background and Terminology X Window System on Silicon Graphics Systems X Window System Concepts Libraries, Toolkits, and Tools Widgets and the Xt Library Other Toolkits and Tools Integrating Your OpenGL Program With IRIS IM Simple Motif Example Program Looking at the Example Program Integrating OpenGL Programs With XSummary Compiling With OpenGL and Related Libraries Link Lines for Individual Libraries Link Lines for Groups of Libraries Chapter 3 OpenGL and X: Examples Using Widgets About OpenGL Drawing−Area Widgets Drawing−Area Widget Setup and Creation Input Handling With Widgets and Xt Creating Colormaps Widget Troubleshooting Using Xlib Simple Xlib Example Program Creating a Colormap and a Window Xlib Event Handling Using Fonts and Strings Chapter 4 OpenGL and
    [Show full text]
  • Seawifs Technical Report Series Volume 8, Proceedings of the First
    NASA Technical Memorandum 104566, Vol. 8 SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Stanford B. Hooker and Elaine R. Firestone, Editors Volume 8, Proceedings of the First SeaWiFS Science Team Meeting Stanford B. Hooker, Wayne E. Esaias, and Lisa A. Rexrode March 1993 NASA Technical Memorandum 104566, Vol. 8 SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Stanford B. Hooker, Editor NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland Elaine R. Firestone, Technical Editor General Sciences Corporation Laurel, Maryland Volume 8, Proceedings of the First SeaWiFS Science Team Meeting Stanford B. Hooker and Wayne E. Esaias NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland Lisa A. Rexrode General Sciences Corporation Laurel, Maryland National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland 20771 1993 Proceedings of the First SeaWiFS Science Team Meeting Preface The occasion of the First SeaWiFS Science Team Meeting represents a major milestone on behalf of the ocean color community to renew satellite ocean color observations following the Coastal Zone Color Scanner (CZCS) proof-of-concept mission. The meeting was hosted by the SeaWiFS Project and attended by 56 team members (or their delegates) representing 17 countries, plus observers from many U.S. and foreign agencies, institutions, and corporations. The breadth of interest and expertise attests to the maturity of this new field, and to the importance attached to the SeaWiFS mission. These Proceedings of the meeting attempt to summarize the major deliberations of the group, and to provide a current directory of investigations. It is somewhat unusual in NASA programs to institute a science team of this size relatively late with respect to the expected launch date, but the complexion of the mission is quite different from what has been attempted in the past.
    [Show full text]
  • IRIS® Software Installation Guide • Silicongraphics
    IRIS® Software Installation Guide SiliconGraphics • Computer Systems IRIS® Software Installation Guide Document Number 007-1364-040 9/94 Contributors Written by Susan Ellis Edited by Gail Larrick Cover design and illustration by Rob Aguilar, Rikk Carey, Dean Hodgkinson, Erik Lindholm and Kay Maitz Production by Lorrie Williams Engineering contributions by Sunita Das and Dave Olson @Copyright 1991,1993, Silicon Graphics, Inc.- All Rights Reserved This document contains proprietary and confidential information of Silicon Graphics, Inc. The contents of this document may not be disclosed to third parties, copied, or duplicated in any form, in whole or in part, without the prior written permission of Silicon Graphics, Inc. Restricted Rights Legend Use, duplication, or disclosure of the technical data contained in this document by the Government is subject to restrictions as set forth in subdivision (c) (1) (ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause at DFARS 52.227-7013 and/or in similar or successor clauses in the FAR, or in the OOD or NASA FAR Supplement. Unpublished rights reserved under the Copyright Laws of the United States. Contractor/manufacturer is Silicon Graphics, Inc., 2011 N. Shoreline Blvd., Mountain View, CA 94039-7311. • IRIS Software Installation Guide Document Number 007-1364-040 Silicon Graphica, Inc. Mountain View, California Silicon Graphics and IRIS are registered trademarks and IRIX and RealityEngine are trademarks of Silicon Graphics, Inc. Ethernet is a registered trademark of Xerox Corporation. PostScript is a registered trademark of Adobe Systems, Inc. To the Reader The standard manual set includes the IRIS Workspace User's Guide, the Personal System Administration Guide, the IRIS Utilities Guide, the Owner's Guide for your model of workstation, and the IRIS Software Installation Guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Opengl® on Silicon Graphics Systems
    OpenGL® on Silicon Graphics Systems 007-2392-003 CONTRIBUTORS Written by Renate Kempf and Jed Hartman. Revised by Ken Jones. Illustrated by Dany Galgani, Martha Levine, and Chrystie Danzer Production by Allen Clardy and Karen Jacobson Engineering contributions by Allen Akin, Steve Anderson, David Blythe, Sharon Rose Clay, Terrence Crane, Kathleen Danielson, Tom Davis, Celeste Fowler, Ziv Gigus, David Gorgen, Paul Hansen, Paul Ho, Simon Hui, George Kyriazis, Mark Kilgard, Phil Lacroute, Jon Leech, Mark Peercy, Dave Shreiner, Chris Tanner, Joel Tesler, Gianpaolo Tommasi, Bill Torzewski, Bill Wehner, Nancy Cam Winget, Paula Womack, David Yu, and others. Some of the material in this book is from “OpenGL from the EXTensions to the SOLutions,” which is part of the developer’s toolbox. St. Peter’s Basilica image courtesy of ENEL SpA and InfoByte SpA. Disk Thrower image courtesy of Xavier Berenguer, Animatica. COPYRIGHT © 1996, 1998, 2005 Silicon Graphics, Inc. All rights reserved; provided portions may be copyright in third parties, as indicated elsewhere herein. No permission is granted to copy, distribute, or create derivative works from the contents of this electronic documentation in any manner, in whole or in part, without the prior written permission of Silicon Graphics, Inc. LIMITED RIGHTS LEGEND The software described in this document is "commercial computer software" provided with restricted rights (except as to included open/free source) as specified in the FAR 52.227-19 and/or the DFAR 227.7202, or successive sections. Use beyond license provisions is a violation of worldwide intellectual property laws, treaties and conventions. This document is provided with limited rights as defined in 52.227-14.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Performance of the SGI Altix 4700 Via Scientific Benchmark and Micro-Benchmarks
    Evaluating Performance of the SGI Altix 4700 via Scientific Benchmark and Micro-Benchmarks Mariam Salloum University of California, Riverside Computer Science Department [email protected] ABSTRACT I evaluated the performance of the SGI Altix 4700 by using several well-known benchmarks. In performing these experiments we hope to gain a better understanding of the capabilities and limitations of the system, and thus be able improve upon the design in future generations or develop tools that enhance the performance of the system. INTRODUCTION Micro-benchmarking is a popular technique used as a basis for application performance predication or to evaluate the performance of a particular system in comparison to other systems, or to be used as a predictor for real application performance. There are several benchmarks that have been developed to measure various aspects of the system. In the following sections I will (1) describe the target system, (2) list and describe the benchmarks used to evaluate the system, (3) provide results and analysis for each benchmark, (4) conclude and summarize the results. TARGET SYSTEM The system we are evaluating is the SGI Altix 4700. The following are the specs for this system[1]: • cc-NUMA Distributed Shared Memory (DSM) with distributed cache directory, • 64 1.5 GHz Itanium 2 processors, • Deploys a modified version of the SUSE Linux 2.6.16 kernel, • Fat-tree topology utilizing the NUMAlink 4 interconnect, which offers 3200 MB/s per link, • gcc and Intel C compiler , • Utilizes a first-touch memory placement policy and highest priority first cpu scheduling. BENCHMARKS In the following section I will provide a brief description of the benchmarks used to evaluate the performance of the Altix.
    [Show full text]