MEMORY MAKER ROBERT DENNARD, Winner of THIS YEAR’S IEEE MEDAL of HONOR, FIGURED out How to DO DRAM RIGHT
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
When Is a Microprocessor Not a Microprocessor? the Industrial Construction of Semiconductor Innovation I
Ross Bassett When is a Microprocessor not a Microprocessor? The Industrial Construction of Semiconductor Innovation I In the early 1990s an integrated circuit first made in 1969 and thus ante dating by two years the chip typically seen as the first microprocessor (Intel's 4004), became a microprocessor for the first time. The stimulus for this piece ofindustrial alchemy was a patent fight. A microprocessor patent had been issued to Texas Instruments, and companies faced with patent infringement lawsuits were looking for prior art with which to challenge it. 2 This old integrated circuit, but new microprocessor, was the ALl, designed by Lee Boysel and used in computers built by his start-up, Four-Phase Systems, established in 1968. In its 1990s reincarnation a demonstration system was built showing that the ALI could have oper ated according to the classic microprocessor model, with ROM (Read Only Memory), RAM (Random Access Memory), and I/O (Input/ Output) forming a basic computer. The operative words here are could have, for it was never used in that configuration during its normal life time. Instead it was used as one-third of a 24-bit CPU (Central Processing Unit) for a series ofcomputers built by Four-Phase.3 Examining the ALl through the lenses of the history of technology and business history puts Intel's microprocessor work into a different per spective. The differences between Four-Phase's and Intel's work were industrially constructed; they owed much to the different industries each saw itselfin.4 While putting a substantial part ofa central processing unit on a chip was not a discrete invention for Four-Phase or the computer industry, it was in the semiconductor industry. -
The Birth, Evolution and Future of Microprocessor
The Birth, Evolution and Future of Microprocessor Swetha Kogatam Computer Science Department San Jose State University San Jose, CA 95192 408-924-1000 [email protected] ABSTRACT timed sequence through the bus system to output devices such as The world's first microprocessor, the 4004, was co-developed by CRT Screens, networks, or printers. In some cases, the terms Busicom, a Japanese manufacturer of calculators, and Intel, a U.S. 'CPU' and 'microprocessor' are used interchangeably to denote the manufacturer of semiconductors. The basic architecture of 4004 same device. was developed in August 1969; a concrete plan for the 4004 The different ways in which microprocessors are categorized are: system was finalized in December 1969; and the first microprocessor was successfully developed in March 1971. a) CISC (Complex Instruction Set Computers) Microprocessors, which became the "technology to open up a new b) RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computers) era," brought two outstanding impacts, "power of intelligence" and "power of computing". First, microprocessors opened up a new a) VLIW(Very Long Instruction Word Computers) "era of programming" through replacing with software, the b) Super scalar processors hardwired logic based on IC's of the former "era of logic". At the same time, microprocessors allowed young engineers access to "power of computing" for the creative development of personal 2. BIRTH OF THE MICROPROCESSOR computers and computer games, which in turn led to growth in the In 1970, Intel introduced the first dynamic RAM, which increased software industry, and paved the way to the development of high- IC memory by a factor of four. -
Native Configuration Manager API for Windows Library Reference
Native Configuration Manager API for Windows Operating Systems Library Reference December 2003 05-1903-002 INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH INTEL® PRODUCTS. NO LICENSE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, BY ESTOPPEL OR OTHERWISE, TO ANY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IS GRANTED BY THIS DOCUMENT. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN INTEL'S TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE FOR SUCH PRODUCTS, INTEL ASSUMES NO LIABILITY WHATSOEVER, AND INTEL DISCLAIMS ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY, RELATING TO SALE AND/OR USE OF INTEL PRODUCTS INCLUDING LIABILITY OR WARRANTIES RELATING TO FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, MERCHANTABILITY, OR INFRINGEMENT OF ANY PATENT, COPYRIGHT OR OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT. Intel products are not intended for use in medical, life saving, or life sustaining applications. Intel may make changes to specifications and product descriptions at any time, without notice. This Native Configuration Manager API for Windows Operating Systems Library Reference as well as the software described in it is furnished under license and may only be used or copied in accordance with the terms of the license. The information in this manual is furnished for informational use only, is subject to change without notice, and should not be construed as a commitment by Intel Corporation. Intel Corporation assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or inaccuracies that may appear in this document or any software that may be provided in association with this document. Except as permitted by such license, no part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without express written consent of Intel Corporation. -
CONTACT: Robin Mesger the Lippin Group 323/965-1990 FOR
CONTACT: Robin Mesger The Lippin Group 323/965-1990 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 14, 2002 2002 PRIMETIME EMMY AWARDS The Academy of Television Arts & Sciences (ATAS) tonight (Saturday, September 14, 2002) presented Emmys in 61 categories for programs and individual achievements at the 54th Annual Emmy Awards Presentation at the Shrine Auditorium. Included among the presentations were Emmy Awards for the following previously announced categories: Outstanding Achievement in Animation and Outstanding Voice-Over Performance. ATAS Chairman & CEO Bryce Zabel presided over the awards ceremony assisted by a lineup of major television stars as presenters. The awards, as tabulated by the independent accounting firm of Ernst & Young LLP, were distributed as follows: Programs Individuals Total HBO 0 16 16 NBC 1 14 15 ABC 0 5 5 A&E 1 4 5 FOX 1 4 5 CBS 1 3 4 DISC 1 3 4 UPN 0 2 2 TNT 0 2 2 MTV 1 0 1 NICK 1 0 1 PBS 1 0 1 SHO 0 1 1 WB 0 1 1 Emmys in 27 other categories will be presented at the 2002 Primetime Emmy Awards telecast on Sunday, September 22, 2002, 8:00 p.m. – conclusion, ET/PT) over the NBC Television Network at the Shrine Auditorium. A complete list of all awards presented tonight is attached, The final page of the attached list includes a recap of all programs with multiple awards. For further information, see www.emmys.tv. To receive TV Academy news releases via electronic mail, please address your request to [email protected] or [email protected]. -
Delft University of Technology on Leveraging Vertical Proximity in 3D
Delft University of Technology On Leveraging Vertical Proximity in 3D Memory Hierarchies Lefter, Mihai DOI 10.4233/uuid:f744c1af-505e-440c-bc49-2a1d95d0591d Publication date 2018 Document Version Final published version Citation (APA) Lefter, M. (2018). On Leveraging Vertical Proximity in 3D Memory Hierarchies. https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:f744c1af-505e-440c-bc49-2a1d95d0591d Important note To cite this publication, please use the final published version (if applicable). Please check the document version above. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons. Takedown policy Please contact us and provide details if you believe this document breaches copyrights. We will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. This work is downloaded from Delft University of Technology. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to a maximum of 10. On Leveraging Vertical Proximity in 3D Memory Hierarchies Cover inspired by the works of Dirk Huizer and Anatoly Konenko. On Leveraging Vertical Proximity in 3D Memory Hierarchies Dissertation for the purpose of obtaining the degree of doctor at Delft University of Technology by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. dr. ir. T.H.J.J. van der Hagen chair of the Board for Doctorates to be defended publicly on Wednesday 14 November 2018 at 10:00 o’clock by Mihai LEFTER Master of Science in Computer Engineering Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands born in Bras, ov, Romania This dissertation has been approved by the promotors. -
I Huvudet På Bender Futurama, Parodi, Satir Och Konsten Att Se På Tv
Lunds universitet Oscar Jansson Avd. för litteraturvetenskap, SOL-centrum LIVR07 Handledare: Paul Tenngart 2012-05-30 I huvudet på Bender Futurama, parodi, satir och konsten att se på tv Innehållsförteckning Förord ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Inledning ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Tidigare forskning och utmärkelser ................................................................................... 7 Bender’s Head, urval och disposition ................................................................................ 9 Teoretiska ramverk och utgångspunkter .................................................................................. 11 Förförståelser, genre och tolkning .................................................................................... 12 Parodi, intertextualitet och implicita agenter ................................................................... 18 Parodi och satir i Futurama ...................................................................................................... 23 Ett inoriginellt medium? ................................................................................................... 26 Animerad sitcom vs. parodi ............................................................................................. 31 ”Try this, kids at home!”: parodins sammanblandade världar ........................................ -
ABSTRACT GENERALIZING the FUTURAMA THEOREM the 2010
ABSTRACT GENERALIZING THE FUTURAMA THEOREM The 2010 episode of Futurama titled The Prisoner of Benda centers around a machine that swaps the brains of any two people who use it. The problem is, once two people use the machine to swap brains with each other, they cannot swap back. The author of the episode, mathematician Ken Keeler, uses Abstract Algebra to take the problem containing a set of swapped brains, and translate it into permutations in the group Sn. Keeler's method of solving the problem involves writing the inverse of the permutation as a product of transpositions that were not already used. The theorem and proof contained in this episode is known as The Futurama Theorem, or Keeler's Theorem. In 2014, it was proven that Keeler's method was the optimal solution to the problem. In this work, we will present a new proof of Keeler's Theorem. We will also generalize the theorem to products of larger cycles, starting with 3-cycles, and building up to our main goal: a solution for p-cycles where p is a prime. After this solution, we will use the same general ideas to create a solution using products of 2j-cycles. Jennifer E. Elder May 2016 GENERALIZING THE FUTURAMA THEOREM by Jennifer E. Elder A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Mathematics in the College of Science and Mathematics California State University, Fresno May 2016 APPROVED For the Department of Mathematics: We, the undersigned, certify that the thesis of the following student meets the required standards of scholarship, format, and style of the university and the student's graduate degree program for the awarding of the master's degree. -
Microprocessors in the 1970'S
Part II 1970's -- The Altair/Apple Era. 3/1 3/2 Part II 1970’s -- The Altair/Apple era Figure 3.1: A graphical history of personal computers in the 1970’s, the MITS Altair and Apple Computer era. Microprocessors in the 1970’s 3/3 Figure 3.2: Andrew S. Grove, Robert N. Noyce and Gordon E. Moore. Figure 3.3: Marcian E. “Ted” Hoff. Photographs are courtesy of Intel Corporation. 3/4 Part II 1970’s -- The Altair/Apple era Figure 3.4: The Intel MCS-4 (Micro Computer System 4) basic system. Figure 3.5: A photomicrograph of the Intel 4004 microprocessor. Photographs are courtesy of Intel Corporation. Chapter 3 Microprocessors in the 1970's The creation of the transistor in 1947 and the development of the integrated circuit in 1958/59, is the technology that formed the basis for the microprocessor. Initially the technology only enabled a restricted number of components on a single chip. However this changed significantly in the following years. The technology evolved from Small Scale Integration (SSI) in the early 1960's to Medium Scale Integration (MSI) with a few hundred components in the mid 1960's. By the late 1960's LSI (Large Scale Integration) chips with thousands of components had occurred. This rapid increase in the number of components in an integrated circuit led to what became known as Moore’s Law. The concept of this law was described by Gordon Moore in an article entitled “Cramming More Components Onto Integrated Circuits” in the April 1965 issue of Electronics magazine [338]. -
The Futurama Theorem1 Adapted for the Philadelphia Math Teacher’S Circle by Cheryl Grood
The Futurama Theorem1 adapted for the Philadelphia Math Teacher’s Circle by Cheryl Grood Appetizer: Background: This problem (and its solution) appeared in “The Prisoner of Benda,” which is episode 7.10 of the television show Futurama. The episode’s writer, Ken Keeler, has a Ph.D. in applied mathematics from Harvard. (In fact, several of the writers on Futurama hold advanced degrees in mathematics, physics, and computer science!) Keeler discovered/proved this theorem entirely as a means to get the characters out of the complicated situation he had written them into. Ken Keeler won the Writers Guild of America Best Television Writing in Animation award in 2010 for this episode. The setup: Two characters (Professor Farnsworth and Amy) decide to try out their newly- finished “Mind-Switcher” invention on themselves. (“We’re just the people this Mind-Switcher was made for by us!”) A brief montage of hilarity ensues. When they try to switch back, they discover a key flaw in the machine’s design: it will not allow the same pair of bodies to be used in the machine more than once. [clip from show, time stamp 3:33 ! 3:55] The fundamental problem: Is there a way (given the limitations of the machine; ie, no cheating by inventing a better machine!) to restore their minds back to their original bodies? The Amy/Professor pair can never re-enter the machine together, but what if they were able to get one or more unsuspecting stooges to enter the machine? Question: Can all correct mind-body pairings be restored with the help of just one other character? Solution: No. -
Futurama Comedy and Writers in the Classroom Sarah J
Klein’s Beer: Futurama Comedy and Writers in the Classroom Sarah J. Greenwald Appalachian State University Introduction Futurama [1] is an animated science fiction comedy with math, science, or programming jokes in almost every television episode. In the same way that history can provide context to mathematics in the classroom, the rich mathematical history of the show’s writers and the stories of their writing motivations can engage students. A combination of comedy references from the show and quotes from the writers is especially effective in helping to alleviate math anxiety and motivate students to learn and connect to mathematics. In this article we will examine numerous Futurama activities for the classroom, including discussions related to the writers and the representation of mathematics in popular culture, as well as activities related to humorous Futurama math references, including computational number theory and geometry. Figure 1: Klein’s Beer [1, 3ACV12 (The Route of All Evil)] Writers and Humor in the Classroom In the course of earning an undergraduate degree in the mathematical sciences, students study a broad range of mathematical techniques and disciplines. The need to master the fundamental skills of mathematics leads in many instances to a perspective in which mathematics exists unconnected to anything else. Students can become so focused on the present that they perceive mathematics as “closed, dead, emotionless, all discovered... [Teachers] can rescue students from the island of mathematics and relocate them on the mainland of life that contains mathematics that is open, alive, full of emotion, and always interesting” [3]. In the same way that real-life applications and technology can help students connect to mathematics, humorous popular culture references and the related history of the writers who create them can also foster connections. -
Publications Core Magazine, 2007 Read
CA PUBLICATIONo OF THE COMPUTERre HISTORY MUSEUM ⁄⁄ SPRINg–SUMMER 2007 REMARKABLE PEOPLE R E scuE d TREAsuREs A collection saved by SAP Focus on E x TRAORdinARy i MAGEs Computers through the Robert Noyce lens of Mark Richards PUBLISHER & Ed I t o R - I n - c hie f THE BEST WAY Karen M. Tucker E X E c U t I V E E d I t o R TO SEE THE FUTURE Leonard J. Shustek M A n A GI n G E d I t o R OF COMPUTING IS Robert S. Stetson A S S o c IA t E E d I t o R TO BROWSE ITS PAST. Kirsten Tashev t E c H n I c A L E d I t o R Dag Spicer E d I t o R Laurie Putnam c o n t RIBU t o RS Leslie Berlin Chris garcia Paula Jabloner Luanne Johnson Len Shustek Dag Spicer Kirsten Tashev d E S IG n Kerry Conboy P R o d U c t I o n ma n ager Robert S. Stetson W E BSI t E M A n AGER Bob Sanguedolce W E BSI t E d ESIG n The computer. In all of human history, rarely has one invention done Dana Chrisler so much to change the world in such a short time. Ton Luong The Computer History Museum is home to the world’s largest collection computerhistory.org/core of computing artifacts and offers a variety of exhibits, programs, and © 2007 Computer History Museum. -
Die Beiden Hinterhältigen Brüder (Brother from Another Series )
Die beiden hinterhältigen Brüder (Brother From Another Series ) Handlungs- und Dialogabschrift | Januar 2015 by [email protected] | www.simpsons-capsules.net ________________________________________________________________________________ Produktionsnotizen Produktionscode: 4F14 TV-Einteilung: Staffel 8 / Episode 16 Episodennummer: 169 Erstausstrahlung Deutschland: 12.11.1997 Erstaustrahlung USA: 23.02.1997 Autor: Ken Keeler Regie: Pete Michels Musik: Alf Clausen Tafelspruch - keiner Couchgag Die Simpsons kommen in die Wohnstube gerannt, die völlig verkehrt herum, also auf den Kopf gestellt wurde. Als sie dann auf der Couch Platz nehmen wollen, fallen sie ver-ständlicherweise herunter. Ist euch aufgefallen ... ... das Lionel Hutz im Besucherraum des Gefängnisses sitzt? ... das Bart im Restaurant die Kinder-Speisekarte liest? ... das der Eiskübel im Restaurant eine Packung Milch enthält? ... das Bob und Cecile die gleiche Schuhgröße haben? Referenzen / Anspielungen / Seitenhiebe - Der Originaltitel „Brother from Another Series” ist eine Anspielung auf den Actionfilm „Brother from Another Planet“ aus dem Jahr 1984. - Lisa ist der Meinung, das in jedem Zehnjährigen das Herz eines Verbrechers schlägt. Dies ist eine filigrane Anspielung auf ihren zehnjährigen Bruder, der bekanntlich hin und wieder Gemeinheiten ausheckt. - Einige Szenen aus der Folge spielen auf die US-Sitcom „Frasier” an. - Mit Kappadokien meint Bob eine von Erosion und zahlreichen Höhlen und Tälern geprägte Landschaft in Zentralanatolien. Gaststars - keine Bezüge