DOCSLIB.ORG
Recommended publications
  • Asian Studies Programs in Canada
    Asian Studies Programs in Canada University Undergraduate Language Inter- Special Graduate Admission requirements Language requirement Website Requirement disciplinary Programs Programs (for admission) Simon Fraser -Asia-Canada -Yes-6 credits Yes (major in Yes-China No N/A N/A www.sfu.ca/ University Minor Program -No other field) Field School -Certificate in Chinese Studies University of BA Asian studies Yes-6 intro credit hours, 6 Yes Yes + Japan, No N/A N/A www.umanitoba.ca/ Manitoba credit hours India and 200 level or above Hong Kong exchanges University of No Depends on program Grad Program- Study abroad Yes-Collaborative Masters Admission to “home graduate unit’ N/A www.utoronto.ca/ Toronto Yes opportunities program in South Asian for Collaborative Masters in Asia Studies, thesis stream -Anthropology MA and PhD in East Asian -English Studies -Geography MA and PhD in History with -Religion focus in India, China or Japan -Social Work MA and PhD in Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations BA in relevant field with good academic standing and appropriate language training if required University of -BA Asian Area Asian Area studies require Yes Study Abroad Yes-for MA and PhD, see MA:-BA in relevant discipline MA:- 3-4 years previous www.asia.ubc.ca/ British Studies 12 credits of lang. opportunities specific departments -reading competence in 2nd Asian coursework (good reading Columbia -BA Chinese instruction, others require at in Asia (Interdisciplinary) language comprehension) -BA Japanese least 18 credits at the 300 MAs and PhDs are thesis- PhD:-MA in Asian Studies or related -BA Korean level and 6 at the 400 level based field PhD:-good command of Asian -BA South Asian language Languages (Minor only) University of -BA Chinese 30-48 credit units at upper N/A Study Abroad MA in Chinese literature BA with a B average in last two Each MA degree requires 4 http://gradfile.fgsro.u Alberta -BA Japanese year level with 6 units in lit.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Sinology Classics As the Carrier to Improve Students’ Humanistic Literacy Juan Lei and Mengdan Xu Jiangxi Modern Polytechnic College
    ICOI-2018 The 2018 International Conference of Organizational Innovation Volume 2018 Conference Paper Taking Sinology Classics as the Carrier to Improve Students’ Humanistic Literacy Juan Lei and Mengdan Xu Jiangxi Modern Polytechnic College Abstract As the carrier of Chinese traditional culture, classics of sinology bear a long history and rich humanistic spirit, having a positive effect on the education of students from vocational school. At the moment, the work of the vocational school has been highly employment-oriented, and it’s easy to cause the phenomenon of ‘value major and despise humanity’, with the level of humanistic literacy of the students in vocational school not being high. Consequently, it is particularly important to enhance students’ humanistic literacy through the development of Sinology classics teaching in vocational school. Corresponding Author: Juan Lei Keywords: classics of sinology, vocational education, humanistic literacy [email protected] Received: 29 August 2018 Accepted: 18 September 2018 Published: 11 November 2018 In the decision of the State Council on strengthening the development of modern Publishing services provided by Knowledge E vocational education, new requirements for vocational education have been putted forward. It is pointed out that in order to ensure the overall implementation of qual- Juan Lei and Mengdan Xu. This article is distributed ity education, we should strengthen the scientificity and rationality of the education under the terms of the Creative curriculum. In the course of developing vocational education, we should put the pro- Commons Attribution License, fessional ethics and humanity attainments in the first place and carry them out in which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the whole process of education.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Guide MA Modern Sinology Zentraldokument 161005 MD
    Study Guide MA Modern Sinology Winter term 2016/2017 Ostasi atisches Seminar I Heinrich -Düker -Weg 14 I D 37073 Göttingen Welcome Dear Students, We extend you a very warm welcome to the Department of East Asian Studies at the University of Göttingen! You have chosen to pursue one of our sinology Master’s prorgams and are surely very excited about your studies as well as your university life here. To help make your start here as smooth as possible, we have gathered information in this study guide about our department, the sinology Master’s programs and the various organizational aspects of your studies. Please read all of this information very carefully. Should anything remain unclear to you or should you have any questions about your particular situation, please get in touch with the academic advisor. Although your studies will center around required coursework, our programs also allow you to develop your individual research interests. This study guide outlines such opportunities and also provides information about additional course offerings such as calligraphy and a film course. You will also find information about the particulars of the Master’s programs, the options you will have in your chosen program as well as an overview of the wide range of exchange programs on offer. This information will be invaluable to you as you plan your individual course of study in the coming weeks. Please know, too, that we are always happy to have your feedback about our programs; your suggestions will be received positively and incorporated into future iterations of our programs to the extent possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics, Classicism, and Medicine During the Eighteenth Century 十八世紀在德川日本 "頌華者" 和 "貶華者" 的 問題 – 以中醫及漢方為主
    East Asian Science, Technology and Society: an International Journal DOI 10.1007/s12280-008-9042-9 Sinophiles and Sinophobes in Tokugawa Japan: Politics, Classicism, and Medicine During the Eighteenth Century 十八世紀在德川日本 "頌華者" 和 "貶華者" 的 問題 – 以中醫及漢方為主 Benjamin A. Elman Received: 12 May 2008 /Accepted: 12 May 2008 # National Science Council, Taiwan 2008 Abstract This article first reviews the political, economic, and cultural context within which Japanese during the Tokugawa era (1600–1866) mastered Kanbun 漢 文 as their elite lingua franca. Sino-Japanese cultural exchanges were based on prestigious classical Chinese texts imported from Ming (1368–1644) and Qing (1644–1911) China via the controlled Ningbo-Nagasaki trade and Kanbun texts sent in the other direction, from Japan back to China. The role of Japanese Kanbun teachers in presenting language textbooks for instruction and the larger Japanese adaptation of Chinese studies in the eighteenth century is then contextualized within a new, socio-cultural framework to understand the local, regional, and urban role of the Confucian teacher–scholar in a rapidly changing Tokugawa society. The concluding part of the article is based on new research using rare Kanbun medical materials in the Fujikawa Bunko 富士川文庫 at Kyoto University, which show how some increasingly iconoclastic Japanese scholar–physicians (known as the Goiha 古醫派) appropriated the late Ming and early Qing revival of interest in ancient This article is dedicated to Nathan Sivin for his contributions to the History of Science and Medicine in China. Unfortunately, I was unable to present it at the Johns Hopkins University sessions in July 2008 honoring Professor Sivin or include it in the forthcoming Asia Major festschrift in his honor.
    [Show full text]
  • IS SINOLOGY a SCIENCE ? (Full Text)
    IS SINOLOGY A SCIENCE ? (full text) ‘Certainly, it is,’ sinologists may indignantly respond to this rarely raised, though legitimate question. ‘For what other reason would academics treat us as their colleagues,’ they probably will add, as if good-fellowship were proof of scientific qualifications. Well, I am not so sure. Indeed, the thesis I wish to put forward is that sinology (Chin Hanxue or Zhongguo yanjiu, Jap Shinagaku or Chugoku kenkyu) is to be dismissed as pseudo-science, because its practitioners do not command a theory of their own. I do not expect this Copernican proposition to draw down a storm of cheers everywhere. On the contrary, if booing and hissing are accorded to me, I will not be surprised. Yet, a statement saying that there is something fundamentally amiss in sinology should spark a lively debate among scholars. One can only speculate about the result of such a choc des opinions, but it is an unassailable fact that exploration of the base needs to be done before expansion of a building. If occupying oneself with things Chinese is important in this rapidly changing world, so is that second-order activity: scrutinising sinology itself. To avoid misunderstanding, I request the reader to bear one thing in mind all the way through. ‘Students of China’ fall into two distinct categories: (a) graduates in sinology only, i.e., those who learned (modern-standard as well as classical-literary) Chinese and have read all sorts of things about China, and (b) social or human scientists who, after receiving their academic degrees, have concentrated on aspects of China related to their expertise.1 My harsh words are exclusively addressed to group a.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Sinology and Field Journals
    Handbook of Reference Works in Traditional Chinese Studies (R. Eno, 2011) 9. WESTERN SINOLOGY AND FIELD JOURNALS This section of has two parts. The first outlines some aspects of the history of sinology in the West relevant to the contemporary shape of the field. The second part surveys some of the leading and secondary sinological journals, with emphasis on the role they have played historically. I. An outline of sinological development in the West The history of sinology in the West is over 400 years old. No substantial survey will be attempted here; that can wait until publication of The Lives of the Great Sinologists, a blockbuster for sure.1 At present, with Chinese studies widely dispersed in hundreds of teaching institutions, the lines of the scholarly traditions that once marked sharply divergent approaches are not as easy to discern as they were thirty or forty years ago, but they still have important influences on the agendas of the field, and they should be understood in broad outline. One survey approach is offered by the general introduction to Zurndorfer’s guide; its emphasis is primarily on the development of modern Japanese and Chinese scholarly traditions, and it is well worth reading. This brief summary has somewhat different emphases. A. Sinology in Europe The French school Until the beginning of the eighteenth century, Western views of China were principally derived from information provided by occasional travelers and by missionaries, particularly the Jesuits, whose close ties with the Ming and Ch’ing courts are engagingly portrayed by Jonathan Spence in his popular portraits, The Memory Palace of Matteo Ricci and Emperor of China.
    [Show full text]
  • Roxann Prazniak ______Email: [email protected] Robert D
    Roxann Prazniak _____________________________________________________ _ email: [email protected] Robert D. Clark Honors College Academic Positions: Associate Professor of History, Honors College, University of Oregon, 2003-present Resident Faculty, NW Council for Study Abroad Program, Siena, Italy, 2008 & 2014 Visiting Professor of History, Soka University of America, 2006-2007 Assistant Professor of History, Honors College, University of Oregon, 2002-03 Elliott Professor of History, Hampden-Sydney College, 1996-01, renewed 2001 Visiting Professor of History, Duke University, Spring 1998 Associate Professor of History, Hampden-Sydney College, 1990-1995 Assistant Professor of History, Hampden-Sydney College, Virginia, 1987-1990 Assistant Professxor of History, Linfield College, Oregon, 1981-82, 1983-87. Degrees and Education: Ph.D., History, March 1981, University of California, Davis M.A. History, 1973, San Francisco State University B.A. History, 1970, University of California, Berkeley Book Publications: Of Camel Kings and Other Things: Rural Rebels Against Modernity in Late Imperial China, [Boulder: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999]; Chinese edition title, Luotuo wang de gushi: Qingmo min bian yanjiu, translator Liu Ping, (Beijing: Commercial Press, 2014). Dialogues Across Civilizations: Sketches in World History from the Chinese and European Experiences [Boulder: Westview Press/HarperCollins, 1996] Taiwan English edition, Taibei 1998. Book in Progress: Sudden Appearances: Visuality and Belief in Mongol Eurasia [book manuscript to University of Hawai’i Press] Edited Books: Global Capitalism and the Future of Agrarian Society, edited by Arif Dirlik, Roxann Prazniak, Alec Woodside [Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers, 2012] 1 Place and Politics in an Age of Globalization, edited by Roxann Prazniak and Arif Dirlik [Boulder: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001] Refereed Journal Articles (sole authored unless otherwise noted) “Ilkhanid Buddhism: Traces of a Passage in Eurasian History” Comparative Studies in Society and History, July 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sinocentric Subject and the Paradox of Tianxia-Ism
    International Theory (2020), page 1 of 31 doi:10.1017/S1752971920000214 RESEARCH ARTICLE Whither Chinese IR? The Sinocentric subject and the paradox of Tianxia-ism Sinan Chu Institute of Asian Studies, German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA), Rothenbaumchaussee 32, Hamburg 20148, Germany Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract This essay critically assesses the Tianxia Theories, a line of indigenous International Relations (IR) theorizing in China organized around the concept of Tianxia (‘all-under-hea- ven’). My goal is to tackle a seemingly prevalent issue among non-Western IR theories, that is, the indigenous scholars’ subservience to state cues and often uncritical attitude toward their own ethnocentrism. To that end, I strategically target a recent contribution to this scholarship that explicitly seeks to articulate a non-ethnocentric theory: Xu Jilin’sNew Tianxia-ism (xin tianxia zhuyi). I first examine the main thesis of New Tianxia-ism to reveal its internal tensions. Then I examine what enables the formulation of New Tianxia-ism from a discursive perspective. I argue that a particular subject position, to which I refer as the ‘Sinocentric Subject’, plays an instrumental role in enabling contemporary Chinese intellec- tuals to think along the logics of New Tianxia-ism. The result, however, undermines the agenda to articulate an alternative theory that rectifies the ethnocentrism in IR. In conclu- sion, I suggest that Chinese indigenous scholarship ought to engage more critically the ideo- logical
    [Show full text]
  • Experts Discussed the Problems of Sinology in Kazakhstan
    Experts Discussed the Problems of Sinology in Kazakhstan On February 27, 2019, the IWPR Representative Office in Central Asia, analytical platform CABAR.asia and Center for Chinese Studies “China Center” in Almaty organized a round table on the topic “Sinology in Kazakhstan: the current state and prospects”. Русский Follow us on LinkedIn Since the beginning of 2019, the analytical platform CABAR.asia has published a series of materials on the currents state and prospects of sinology in Central Asian countries. Read more about sinology in Central Asia: Experts Call to Form a Strong School of Sinology in Kyrgyzstan; Experts in Dushanbe Discussed the Prospects of Tajik School of Sinology Development; When Will Tajikistan Start to Explore China? Muratbek Imanaliev: China Is a University That Is Impossible To Graduate From; What Are The “Three Pillars” Of Kazakh Sinology? Ablat Khodjaev: Tashkent was the first capital where sinology was formed in our region. Sinologists of Kazakhstan, representatives of the republican higher educational institutions, analytical experts, researchers and journalists took part in the round table in Almaty. Presentations of thematic reports, a discussion of the status and problems of sinology in Kazakhstan and recommendations were presented for the wide public and decision-makers in the framework of the event. Experts Discussed the Problems of Sinology in Kazakhstan The participants of the round table on the topic “Sinology in Kazakhstan: the current state and prospects”. Photo: cabar.asia History of sinology in Kazakhstan Klara Khafizova – a well-known Orientalist scholar and Doctor of Historical Sciences noted that national school of sinology is at the stage of formation, but has quite good prospects.
    [Show full text]
  • Sinology Education & Traditional Chinese Cultural Heritage: Lotus
    Sinology Education & Traditional Chinese Cultural Heritage: Lotus Pond Sinology Society of Hebei University (HBU), China Shirley Yang (Qianru) Associate Professor of Hebei University Hebei Province surrounds Beijing and Tianjin; and Baoding, the city where the university is located, is 85 miles from Beijing. With more than 1,500 years history, Baoding has been designated as a National Historical and Cultural City by central government. It was the capital city of Hebei Province for nearly 300 years during the beginning of 17th Century to the mid of 20th century and has been a major center of politics and culture in North China. As the only key comprehensive university co-established by the provincial government and the China Ministry of Education, Hebei University leads the way in the development of higher education in Hebei Province. It covers over 2,500 acres, with eight campuses, more than 3,300 full-time faculty (about 2,000 of whom have doctorates), and nearly 50,000 undergraduate and graduate students . There are 30 colleges and 5 independent departments in HBU, providing undergraduate programs for 87 majors and awarding Headquarters Office master's degrees in 40 disciplines. In addition, Hebei University Building of the awards doctorates in optics, engineering, chemistry, Chinese Main Campus language & literature, philosophy, history, management, engineering, and communications. Hebei University has established friendly cooperating relations with more than sixty universities and research institutions in the United States, Canada, Russia, Australia, New Zealand, Britain, France, Ireland, Brazil, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Mongolia. HBU attaches great importance to international cooperation and exchanges, hosting many regional and international conferences.
    [Show full text]
  • Missionary, Sinology, and Literary Periodicals 
    CHINA FROM EMPIRE TO REPUBLIC MISSIONARY, SINOLOGY, AND LITERARY PERIODICALS The essential digital primary source collection for researchers of China in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, providing unique, firsthand accounts of the cultural interactions and conflicts that gave rise to today’s modern China. The ability to cross-search this collection with other Asian Studies collections such as NCCO: Asia and the West through Gale Primary Sources opens never-before-available opportunities for scholarship and discovery. Gale Primary Sources GALE.COMEMPIRE Start at the source. China from Empire to Republic: Missionary, Sinology, and Literary Periodicals is a SUBJECTS SUPPORTED: collection of 17 English-language periodicals published in or about China during a period of • Asian studies over 130 years, extending from 1817 until the founding of the People’s Republic of China in • Chinese history 1949. This corresponds to the periods of the late Qing Dynasty and the Republican Era • Missionary and religious studies (1911–1949), when China experienced the radical and often traumatic transformation from • Political science an inward-looking imperial dynasty into a globally engaged republic. • History of journalism • Cultural studies Set within the context of such major historical events as the Opium Wars, the Taiping • Educational history Rebellion, the Boxer Rebellion, the Revolution of 1911, the second Sino-Japanese War, and the Chinese Civil War, these periodicals illuminate the thoughts of Chinese intellectuals and ADVISORY BOARD: Westerners, mainly missionaries, about China – and, more importantly, their efforts to Dr. Max Ko-wu Huang understand and study Chinese history, culture, language, and literature. Former Director and Distinguished Research THE PERIODICALS CONTAINED IN THIS COLLECTION INCLUDE: Fellow, Institute of Missionary journals, as represented by The Chinese Recorder and The West China Missionary Modern History, News, two of the most famous missionary periodicals published in China before 1949.
    [Show full text]
  • On the General Characteristics of Sinology Researches in Turkey
    Humanities and Social Sciences 2015; 3(6): 293-298 Published online December 22, 2015 (http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/hss) doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20150306.12 ISSN: 2330-8176 (Print); ISSN: 2330-8184 (Online) On the General Characteristics of Sinology Researches in Turkey Eyüp Saritaş Department of Chinese, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey Email address: [email protected] To cite this article: Eyüp Saritaş. On the General Characteristics of Sinology Researches in Turkey. Humanities and Social Sciences. Vol. 3, No. 6, 2015, pp. 293-298. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20150306.12 Abstract: As once expressed by the German Sinologist Prof. Dr. Wolfram Eberhard, Sinology is a national discipline for the Turks simply because it is the Chinese sources that provide the most extensive and elaborative records on the ancient Turkish history and culture. Well then, do we, the Turkish sinologists, give due consideration to sinology researches, which function as in integral part of the Turkish history and culture? Sadly, answer to this question is most of the time not affirmative. Even though Wolfram Eberhard levelled up the Turkish sinology to an international scale during his office at Ankara University in 1937-1948, the methods initiated by him could not be resumed after his departure from Turkey, which in turn, resulted in stagnation of the discipline. The fact that sinology researches do not run complementary to one another, and failure to publish research results - which absolutely take great efforts, time and energy- and to make them available for and accessible to a large mass, discipline's failure to come up with long-lasting works that would pave the ground for further researches for the Turkish culture, that native sinologists cannot employ an extensive perspective to sinology researches, and either fail or are unwilling to establish principles with regards to scientific methods utilised to this end can be listed amongst the primary reasons for the aforecited stagnation.
    [Show full text]