DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Marina City of Marina 211 HILLCREST AVENUE MARINA, CA 93933 831- 884-1278; FAX 831- 384-9148

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Marina City of Marina 211 HILLCREST AVENUE MARINA, CA 93933 831- 884-1278; FAX 831- 384-9148 City of Marina City of Marina 211 HILLCREST AVENUE MARINA, CA 93933 831- 884-1278; FAX 831- 384-9148 www.cityofmarina.org Steve Endsley July 18, 2018 Assistant Executive Officer Fort Ord Reuse Authority 920 2nd Ave., Suite A Marina, CA 93933 RE: FORA Consistency Determination for the Marina Municipal Airport Master Plan Update Dear Mr. Endsley: This letter is a formal request to the Fort Ord Reuse Authority (FORA) for a consistency determination for the comprehensive update to the City of Marina’s Municipal Airport Master Plan. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recommends that airports update their long-term planning documents every seven to 10 years, or as necessary to address local changes at an airport. The last Master Plan for Marina Municipal Airport (Airport) was finalized in 2008. In 2014, the City of Marina received a grant from the FAA to update the Airport Master Plan. The FAA grant covers 90 percent of the fixed fee project cost, with the City providing a ten percent match. The provided package includes staff reports and City Council Resolutions needed to fully entitle the project and consists of the following: ▪ City Council Resolution No. 2018-62, approving the Marina Municipal Airport Master Plan Update; ▪ City Council Resolution No. 2018-63, finding the Marina Municipal Airport Master Plan Update consistent with the Fort Ord Base Reuse Plan; and ▪ City Council Resolution No. 2018-64, adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for the Marina Municipal Airport Master Plan Update. Advisory recommendation of the Planning Commission were considered during City Council review of the project. ____________________________________________________________________________________ ___ S e r v i n g a W o r l d C l a s s C o m m u n i t y Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared and a Notice of Determination was filed with the County Clerk. All documents have been upload to FORA staff-provided Dropbox account and include the following: ▪ From the City Council meeting of June 5, 2018 ➢ City Council Staff Report ➢ Resolution No. 2018-62 with Exhibits (Exhibit A can be found at http://marina.airportstudy.com/master-plan/ due to the size of the document) ➢ Resolution No. 2018-63 with Exhibit ➢ Resolution No. 2018-64 with Exhibits ▪ FORA required documents: ➢ RUDG Checklist ➢ Consistency Determination Submittal Worksheet ➢ FORA Consistency Determination Analysis Table (as Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2018-63) Thank you in advance for your review and consideration. Please contact me at (831) 884-1238 if you have questions or if you need additional information. Sincerely, Christy Hopper Planning Services Manager Community Development Department City of Marina RESOLUTION NO. 2018-63 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA FINDING THE MARINA MUNICIPAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE CONSISTENT WITH THE FORT ORD BASE REUSE PLAN WHEREAS, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recommends that airports update their long-term planning documents every seven to 10 years, or as necessary to address local changes at an airport; and, \\.'HEREAS, the last Master Plan for Marina Municipal Airport (Airport) was finalized in 2008; and, WHEREAS, in 2014, the City of Marina received a grant from the FAA to update the Airport Master Plan; and, WHEREAS, Chapter 8 of the Fort Ord Reuse Authority (FORA) Master Resolution requires that all legislative land use decisions affecting property in Former Fort Ord be submitted to FORA for a determination of consistency with the Fort Ord Reuse Plan and Master Resolution; and, WHEREAS, an analysis of consistency prepared in accordance with Master Resolution Chapters 8.02.010 and -.020 criteria for determining consis~ency shows that the project is consistent with the Fort Ord Reuse Plan and Master Resolution; and, WHEREAS, an Initial Study (IS) and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) have been prepared in response to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (under separate Resolution). Through the Initial Study, it has been determined that the project's environmental impacts are less than significant with mitigation measures. These mitigations measures relate to potentially significant impacts associated ~ith biological and cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, transportation/circulation, and utilities and services systems. The Mitigation and Monitoring Program (MMRP) for the project is located on page 119 of the IS-MND. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Marina hereby finds the Marina Municipal Airport Master Plan Update consistent with the Fort Ord Base Reuse Plan as shown on EXHIBIT A. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a r~gular meeting held on the 5th day of June 2018, by the following vote: A YES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Amadeo, Morton, O' Connell, Brown, Delgado NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ATTEST: Anita Sharp, Depil.ey ..c.!!Y)cle rk EXHIBIT A FORA Consistency Determination Table EXHIBIT A FORA Consistency Determination Analysis Table Legislative Land Use Decisions Marina Municipal Airport Master Plan Update May 2018 FORA Master Resolution criteria Discussion LEGISLATIVE LAND USE DECISION CONSISTENCY 8.02.010 (a) In the review, evaluation, and determination of consistency regarding legislative land use decisions, the Authority Board shall disapprove any legislative land use decision for which there is substantial evidence supported by the record, that (1) Provides a land use designation that allows more intense land The Airport Master Plan uses than the uses permitted in the Reuse Plan for the affected Update (AMP) does not territory; intensify existing land uses (2) Provides for a development more dense than the density of use The AMP does not include permitted in the Reuse Plan for the affected territory; proposals for development (3) Is not in substantial conformance with applicable programs SEE SEPARATE specified in the Reuse Plan and Section 8.02.020 of this Master WORKSHEET Resolution; The Airport Master Plan (4) Provides uses which conflict or are incompatible with uses Update (AMP) does not permitted or allowed in the Reuse Plan for the affected property or propose changes to existing which conflict or are incompatible with open space, recreational, or land uses already found habitat management areas within the jurisdiction of the Authority; compatible with the Base Reuse Plan (5) Does not require or otherwise provide for the financing and/or The AMP does not include installation, construction, and maintenance of all infrastructure proposals for development necessary to provide adequate public services to the property covered by the legislative land use decision; and The AMP proposes are to the northeast of the runway as (6) Does not require or otherwise provide for implementation of the additional habitat to mitigate Fort Ord Habitat Management Plan. the future extension of the runway – the result is a net zero impact (b) FORA shall not preclude the transfer of intensity of land uses The Airport Master Plan and/or density of development involving properties within the Update (AMP) does not affected territory as long as the land use decision meets the overall intensify or transfer existing intensity and density criteria of Sections 8.02.010(a)(1) and (2) land uses above as long as the cumulative net density or intensity of the Fort Ord Territory is not increased. Page 1 of 8 EXHIBIT A FORA Consistency Determination Analysis Table Legislative Land Use Decisions Marina Municipal Airport Master Plan Update May 2018 (c) The Authority Board, in its discretion, may find a legislative land use decision is in substantial compliance with the Reuse Plan when the Authority Board finds that the applicant land use agency has demonstrated compliance with the provisions specified in this section and Section 8.020.020 of this Master Resolution. 8.02.020 (a) Prior to approving any development entitlements, each land use agency shall act to protect natural resources and open spaces on Fort Ord Territory by including the open space and conservation policies and programs of the Reuse Plan, applicable to the land use agency, into their respective general, area, and specific plans. (1) Each land use agency shall review each application for a N/A development entitlement for compatibility with adjacent open space land uses and require suitable open space buffers to be incorporated into the development plans of any potentially incompatible land uses as a condition of project approval. (2) When buffers are required as a condition of approval adjacent N/A to Habitat Management areas, the buffer shall be designed in a manner consistent with those guidelines set out in the Habitat Management Plan. Roads shall not be allowed within the buffer area adjacent to Habitat Management areas except for restricted access maintenance or emergency access roads. (b) Each land use agency shall include policies and programs in their N/A respective applicable general, area, and specific plans that will ensure consistency of future use of the property within the coastal zone through the master planning process of the California Department of Parks and Recreation, if applicable. All future use of such property shall comply with the requirements of the Coastal Zone Management Act and the California Coastal Act and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • [Project Title]
    SCREENCHECK DRAFT INITIAL STUDY Joby Aviation Manufacturing Facility File No. DR 2019-27 January 2020 Prepared with Prepared By: the Assistance of: City of Marina Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc. 209 Cypress Avenue 947 Cass Street, Suite 5 Marina, California 93933 Monterey, California 93940 Contact: Christine Hopper Contact: Josh Harwayne This page was left intentionally blank. Table of Contents I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................................................................... 1 II. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ................................... 3 A. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 3 B. PROJECT LOCATION ................................................................................................................................... 3 C. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................. 6 D. OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT .............................................................................................. 8 E. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE, STAGING, AND EQUIPMENT ............................................................ 13 F. PROJECT APPROVALS AND PERMITS REQUIRED ............................................................................. 13 III. PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL AND STATE PLANS AND MANDATED LAWS .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Airports Economics Impacts Study Final 2003
    Airports Economic Impacts Study for Monterey, San Benito and Santa Cruz Counties August 13, 2003 Prepared by the Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments and funded, in part, by the Federal Aviation Administration AMBAG Airports Economic Impact Study Executive Summary The Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments (AMBAG) received grant funding from the Federal Aviation Administration to complete an economic analysis of the regional importance of the six public airports serving the AMBAG region (Monterey, San Benito and Santa Cruz Counties). Of the region’s airports, the Monterey Peninsula Airport is the only scheduled air carrier airport in the region while all six airports serve general aviation purposes. These airports are: Hollister Municipal Airport: Located in the northern end of the city of Hollister and operated by the City for general aviation. Marina Municipal Airport: After the closure of Fort Ord, the City of Marina was conveyed Fritzsche Army Airfield in 1995. The City reopened the airport as a municipal general aviation airport. Mesa Del Rey (King City) Airport: Located in south Monterey County, this airport is operated by the City of King for general aviation. Monterey Peninsula Airport: The Monterey Peninsula Airport District operates this facility on the Monterey Peninsula. The District is composed of the Cities of Carmel-by- the-Sea, Monterey, Pacific Grove, Seaside, Sand City, Del Rey Oaks and portions of the Monterey County unincorporated area. This airport supports general aviation and commercial, air carrier traffic. Salinas Municipal Airport: The City of Salinas operates this general aviation airport located within their sphere of influence in Monterey County.
    [Show full text]
  • Marina Municipal Airport
    RESOLUTION NO. 2018-149 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA APPROVING CONDITIONAL AIRPORT USE PERMIT FOR SKYDIVE MONTEREY BAY, INC. TO USE AN INTERIM PARACHUTE DROP ZONE AT MARINA MUNICIPAL AIRPORT; AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CONDITIONAL AIRPORT USE PERMIT ON BEHALF OF CITY, SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY WHEREAS, Skydive Monterey Bay, Inc. (SMB) has operated at Marina Municipal Airport since June 1996 and has utilized the eastern portion of the Airport (near the north tarmac) for parachute landings under terms and conditions of Conditional Airport Use Permits (CAUP); and WHEREAS, having SMB at the Marina Municipal Airport is desirable and generates revenue for the airport; and WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of December 20, 2016, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2016-162, approving a CAUP for Skydive Monterey Bay, Inc. to use an interim parachute drop zone at the Marina Municipal Airport from April 1, 2016 through December 31, 2018; and WHEREAS, the 2016 permit provided for an alternate interim parachute drop zone in the requested area north of the north tarmac and east of Taxiway A. To date, this drop zone location has been working effectively to reduce conflicts with the non-aeronautical activities being conducted on the north and south tarmacs, while improving the turnaround times between jumps; and WHEREAS, the CAUP to utilize an interim parachute drop zone is presented for City Council consideration (“EXHIBIT A”); and WHEREAS, the alternate interim parachute drop zone located north of the north tarmac and east of taxiway A (see EXHIBIT A of the Permit) has been identified and designated in the Airport Master Plan as the long-term location for use as an interim parachute drop zone; and WHEREAS, the CAUP allows for SMB’s use of the alternate and/or interim parachute drop zones for the period of January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Revisions to Marina Municipal Airport Land Use Plan
    Draft Marina Municipal Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan April 2006 WADELL ENGINEERING CORPORATION AIRPORT PLANNING ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS Draft Marina Municipal Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan Revisions Incorporating Safety Areas from the California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook (January 2002) With Updated AMBAG Forecasts And Updated Noise Modeling Using the FAA INM 6.1 April 2006 Prepared for the: City of Marina Prepared by: Wadell Engineering Corporation Airport Planning – Engineering – Management Consultants Burlingame, California TABLE OF CONTENTS (Revised Sections Shown in Italics) Chapter One - Introduction .......................................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND AUTHORIZATION ...................................................................................1 Monterey County Airport Land Use Commission..................................................................2 PLAN ORGANIZATION.......................................................................................................2 PLAN ADOPTION PROCESS ..............................................................................................2 Chapter Two - Marina Municipal Airport...............................................................................3 LOCATION AND SETTING.................................................................................................3 HISTORY ...............................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMARY of the October 2020 WEATHER on the MONTEREY PENINSULA General: October Was Yet Another Warm and Dry Month with Light Winds and More Fog Than Normal
    Department of Meteorology Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California 93943 SUMMARY of the October 2020 WEATHER ON THE MONTEREY PENINSULA General: October was yet another warm and dry month with light winds and more fog than normal. Marina recorded 10 days with fog (visibility less than a quarter mile), which is four more than the normal number of fog-days. Smoke, which had impacted the area during August and September was much reduced during October. Temperature: Temperatures during October can be quite warm to hot as the last vestiges of summer are possible with off-shore winds. Two of these episodes happened this past month (01-02 Oct and 15- 17 Oct) with temperatures into the 90s°F. Warmest reading at our Upper Monterey site was a toasty 98°F on 02 Oct. Carmel Valley reached 103°F and Big Sur 102°F on this day and the rest of our observers recorded 90°F or higher as well (below, see the table of Comparative Weather Data for Stations contributing to this summary). At our Upper Monterey site, one daily maximum record was set on 16 Oct with a reading of 93°F. This eclipsed the old record of 92°F set in 1967 and again in 1997. Daily warm minimum records were set or tied with 77°F on 01 Oct (old record was 66°F in 1980), 71°F on 15 Oct (tied old record set in 1961), and 70°F on 16 Oct bested the previous record of 64°F set back in 1967. For the month, average high was 76.5°F (6.0°F warmer than long-term average) and average low was 56.5°F (5.0°F above normal).
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life
    Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life JUNE 2003 PUBLIC USE AIRPORTS BY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Commercial/Primary (29) Metropolitan (20) Regional (66) Community (102) Limited Use (33) Joint Use — Military/Commercial (2) The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the State of California or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. This report was prepared with funds from a grant provided by the United States Government (80%) and funds from the State of California (20%). Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life FINAL REPORT Prepared for BUSINESS,TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS Submitted by Economics Research Associates JUNE 2003 ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Nancy Benjamin Alan R. Tubbs Study Project Manager District Field Services Manager California Department of Transportation Airborne Express, Mather Field Division of Aeronautics Chuck Oldham R. Austin Wiswell Robert Chung Chief California Transportation Commission California Department of Transportation Division of Aeronautics Carl Williams Senior Policy Director Michael Armstrong California Space Authority, Inc. (CSA) Senior Lead Planner Southern California Association of Governments Bonnie Cornwall (SCAG) Program Manager Division
    [Show full text]
  • City of Marina History
    Marina’s History 1868 to 1945 Dating back to (circa) 1868, about 9,000 acres of land stretching north along the Pacific Ocean, and east along the Salinas River, was owned by the late David Jacks and James Bardin. The land block breakup began in 1885, when the Bardin heirs sold 1,372 ½ acres to John Armstrong for farmland and grazing. About a year later, 1,450 acres were sold, then named the Sand Hill Ranch. Four hundred acres near the ocean were sold to the San Francisco Sand Company, which subsequently constructed a sand plant in 1906. Thus, a third of the large block of land had been parceled out. In 1913, a land map designated the general area “Bardin”, but this designation was short-lived. Within two years, the area was known as “Locke-Paddon Colonies”, then “Paddonville”. In 1915, real estate salesman William Locke-Paddon from San Francisco was looking for land to sub-divide and found the breakup of the large Bardin and Jacks estate as an opportunity. On May 29, 1915, Locke-Paddon purchased 1500 acres south of Sand Hill Ranch designated as the “Pueblo Tract No. 1, City Lands of Monterey” requiring him to obtain a loan of one thousand dollars through the auspices of C.F. Reindollar, then president of the San Rafael Bank. Lock-Paddon then sold 5- acre plots for about $75.00 an acre, hoping to create a future farming community. People were slow in staking their claims, and many were not farmers but managed to raise peas, potatoes, turnips, and cabbage, thereby enabling them to subsist on their land, along with the rabbit stew (rabbits were plentiful in the area) and sourdough bread that they concocted.
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMARY of the April 2021 WEATHER on the MONTEREY PENINSULA General: Weather During April 2021 Was Cool and Dry, a Trend Which Started in February 2021
    Department of Meteorology Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California 93943 SUMMARY of the April 2021 WEATHER ON THE MONTEREY PENINSULA General: Weather during April 2021 was cool and dry, a trend which started in February 2021. Winds and fog were seasonable. Temperature: Temperatures in April at our Upper Monterey site were somewhat remarkable, with just two maximum temperatures above 70°F. Following a warm 81°F on 01 April, daily highs languished in the upper 50s°F to low 60s°F for most of April. Only a 68°F reading on 18 April and 73°F on 28 April offered respite from the coolness. For the month, Upper Monterey registered an average high of 59.0°F, 4.7°F below normal and an average low of 46.7°F, 0.8°F above normal. Highest temperature at our Upper Monterey site was 81°F on 01 April and lowest was 44°F on 26 April. One daily record was the 57°F warm minimum on 01 April (previous record was 56°F in 2011). In the local area, highest readings were 87°F at Salinas, and 85°F at Fort Ord and Big Sur (all on 01 April). The cool spots were Big Sur (34°F on 04 April) and Carmel Valley (35°F on 14 April). Marina reported two days with light frost (normal is one), on 26 and 27 April. Normal last day of frost for Marina is 25 March (see Table of Comparative Weather Data for Stations contributing to this summary, and graphic of daily temperatures and rainfall from Upper Monterey, below).
    [Show full text]
  • Community Relations Plan Update Number 4 Fort Ord, California
    FINAL COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN UPDATE NUMBER 4 FORT ORD, CALIFORNIA Department of the Army Fort Ord Base Realignment and Closure Office P. O. Box 5008 Monterey, California 93944-5008 November 2013 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 OVERVIEW OF THE COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN .................................................. 3 1.1 Introduction 3 1.2 Regulatory Overview 3 1.3 Community Relations Plan Organization 4 1.4 Purpose 4 1.5 Point of Contact 5 1.6 Information Sources 5 1.7 Key Community Interests and Concerns 5 1.8 Objective 6 1.9 Role of the Base Realignment and Closure Environmental Process 6 1.10 Role of the Base Realignment and Closure Cleanup Team 6 1.11 Role of the Army 6 1.12 Role of the Regulatory Agencies 6 1.13 Role of the Fort Ord Reuse Authority 7 1.14 Role of the Community 7 1.15 Base Realignment and Closure / Property Transfer 7 2.0 FORMER FORT ORD SITE DESCRIPTION ..................................................................... 9 2.1 Regional Setting 9 2.2 Climate 9 2.3 Biological Setting 9 3.0 FORT ORD HISTORY ............................................................................................................ 11 3.1 Military History 11 3.2 Environmental Cleanup History 11 i 4.0 FORT ORD LAND USE ......................................................................................................... 13 4.1 Developed Land 13 4.2 Undeveloped Land 14 4.3 Impacts of Future Development 14 5.0 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION ........................................................ 15 5.1 Soil 15 5.2 Groundwater 15 5.3 Overview of the Soil and Groundwater Cleanup Process 17 6.0 CLEANUP OF MUNITIONS AND EXPLOSIVES OF CONCERN ............................ 20 6.1 Munitions Response Sites 20 6.2 Military Munitions Response Program 20 • 6.2.1 Military Munitions Response Program Goal ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Basewide Site Safety and Health Plan Former Fort Ord, California
    BASEWIDE SITE SAFETY AND HEALTH PLAN FORMER FORT ORD, CALIFORNIA TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION CONTRACT CONTRACT NO. DACW05-96-D-0011 TASK ORDER NO. 011 Submitted to: U.S. Department of the Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento 1325 "J" Street Sacramento, California 95814-2922 Submitted by: Shaw Environmental, Inc. #4 All Pro Lane Marina, California 95045 December 2004 Revision 8 Issued to:___________________________ Date:_______________ Copy #:_______ Controlled Uncontrolled BASEWIDE SITE SAFETY AND HEALTH PLAN FORMER FORT ORD, CALIFORNIA TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION CONTRACT CONTRACT NO. DACW05-96-D-0011 TASK ORDER NO. 011 December 2004 Revision 8 Approved by: Date: Peter Kelsall Project Manager Approved by: Date: Tom Ghigliotto Contractor Quality Control System Manager Approved by: Date: Charles Luckie Site Safety and Health Officer Approved by: Date: Rudy VonBurg, C.I.H. Program Certified Industrial Hygienist CONTRACT NO. DACW05-96-D-0011 SITE SAFETY AND HEALTH PLAN ACKNOWLEDGMENT FORM The contract for the above project requires that you be provided with complete formal and site- specific training; that you be supplied with proper personal protective equipment, including respirators; that you be trained in its use; and that you receive a medical examination to evaluate your physical capacity to perform your assigned work tasks under the environmental conditions expected while wearing the required personal protective equipment. These provisions are to be done at no cost to you. By signing this certification, you are acknowledging that your employer has met these obligations to you. I HAVE REVIEWED, UNDERSTAND, AND AGREE TO FOLLOW THE SITE SAFETY AND HEALTH PLAN FOR THE FORT ORD REMEDIAL ACTION SITE.
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMARY of the January 2021 WEATHER on the MONTEREY PENINSULA General: January Began with a Weak Storm Dropping Nearly Half an Inch of Rain Over the Region
    Department of Meteorology Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California 93943 SUMMARY of the January 2021 WEATHER ON THE MONTEREY PENINSULA General: January began with a weak storm dropping nearly half an inch of rain over the region. A ridge of high pressure then built in giving us nearly a week of warm, dry weather. This ridge retrograded to the southwest opening the storm door for cool, windy and wet Gulf of Alaska storms to impact the local area. The combination of high winds with lots of precipitation during the storm of 26-28 Jan led to many fallen trees and branches with resultant power outages across the Monterey Peninsula. Hwy 101 was closed for a period due to water over the roadway near Chualar (which was also flooded) and parts of Hwy 1 were damaged south of Big Sur due to washouts. Regions impacted by recent fires were on high alert for debris flows. Storms in January are not uncommon, but this one stalled over our area and produced impressive rainfall totals in the local area. Figure 1. Visible satellite image of major storm approaching on the afternoon of 26 Jan 2021. Temperature: Monterey’s long-term average temperatures in January are 59.9°F for daily highs and 43.4°F for overnight lows. This past month exhibited distinct periods: near normal 01-05 Jan, warmer than average 06-13 Jan, near-record warmth 14-19 Jan and below normal after 22 Jan (see graphic of daily temperatures and precipitation for the month for Upper Monterey, below). During 14-19 Jan, sites in the local area reached as high as 85°F at Big Sur (16th), 84°F (15th) and 83°F (17th) at Salinas and 81°F (14th and 15th) at Carmel Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Marina Municipal Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan
    Marina Municipal Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan Monterey County Airport Land Use Commissio n Adopted November 18, 1996 Monterey County Airport Land Use Commission P.O. Box 1208 Salinas, CA 9390 2 (408) 755-5025 The Monterey Airport Land Use Commission adopted th e Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the Marina Municipal Airport on November 18, 1996 Commissioners Nick Ford, Chairman Jack Barlic h Sherman Blandin Eugene Cabalun a Mari Antonia Dudley Theodore Larso n Carl Potter Proxies to Commissioners Jim Chappel l Denis Hor n Dave Mackie Blaine Michaeli s Joseph Pope Project Staff Robert Slimmon, Jr.: Secretary to the Commission and Director of Monterey County Plannin g & Building Inspectio n William Hopkins : Staff to the Commission and Project Manager Gale Foss: Computer Graphic s Jim DiMaggio : Graphics Patricia Hernandez: Administrative Support Table of Contents Chapter One-Introduction 3 PURPOSE AND AUTHORIZATION 3 Monterey County Airport Land Use Commission 4 PLAN ORGANIZATION 4 PLAN ADOPTION PROCESS 4 Chapter Two-Marina Municipal Airport 5 LOCATION AND SETTING 5 HISTORY 5 EXISTING LAND USE 5 PROPOSED LAND USES OF SURROUNDING LAND 6 AIRPORT INFRAS'1'RUCTURE 7 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS 7 Chapter Three-Compatibility Issues 1 1 1. NOISE 1 1 Noise Impacts at the Marina Municipal Airport 1 1 2. SAFETY 12 Safety Issues at Marina Airport 1 3 3. FLIGHT HAZARDS 14 Flight Hazards at the Marina Airport 14 Ground Hazards 1 4 Height Hazards 1 4 4. OVERFLIGHT IMPACTS 1 5 Overflight Impacts at the Marina Airport 1 5 Chapter Four-Plan Policies 1 6 1 . GENERAL POLICIES 1 6 1 .1 Planning Area 1 6 1 1 .2 Types of Impacts Addressed 1 6 1 .3 Review Criteria 76 1 .4 Review Process 1 8 2.
    [Show full text]