Seaside Resort

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Seaside Resort DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SEASIDE RESORT Subsequent to the Fort Ord Reuse Plan EIR State Clearinghouse Number 2001101059 PREPARED FOR City of Seaside Community Development Department August 2002 SEASIDE RESORT Draft Environmental Impact Report Subsequent to the Fort Ord Reuse Plan EIR State Clearinghouse Number 2001101059 PREPARED FOR City of Seaside Community Development Department Mr. Lou Dell’Angela, Community Development Director 440 Harcourt Avenue Seaside CA 93955 Tel 831.899.6220 Fax 831.899.6211 PREPARED BY EMC Planning Group Inc 301 Lighthouse Avenue Suite C Monterey CA 93940 Tel 831.649.1799 Fax 831.649.8399 [email protected] www.emcplanning.com August 2002 Table of Contents Summary .....................................................................S-1 1.0 Introduction.................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Authorization and Purpose ........................................................1-1 1.2 Project Site and Vicinity Setting..................................................1-5 1.3 Project Description ................................................................ 1-26 1.4 Project Objectives.................................................................. 1-61 1.5 Consistency with Local and Regional Plans................................. 1-62 1.6 Intended Uses of the EIR......................................................... 1-62 1.7 Terminology Used in the EIR ................................................... 1-65 2.0 Environmental Impacts, Setting, and Mitigation Measures ...... 2-1 2.1 Aesthetics ..............................................................................2-1 2.2 Agriculture Resources ............................................................ 2-15 2.3 Air Quality .......................................................................... 2-16 2.4 Biological Resources .............................................................. 2-31 2.5 Cultural Resources ................................................................ 2-47 2.6 Geology and Soils.................................................................. 2-51 2.7 Hazards & Hazardous Materials ............................................... 2-58 2.8 Hydrology & Water Quality..................................................... 2-70 2.9 Mineral Resources ................................................................. 2-77 2.10 Noise .................................................................................. 2-79 2.11 Public Services...................................................................... 2-87 2.12 Transportation.....................................................................2-110 2.13 Utilities and Service Systems...................................................2-137 3.0 Related Environmental Issues ........................................... 3-1 3.1 Cumulative Impacts .................................................................3-1 3.2 Growth-Inducing Impacts......................................................... 3-9 3.3 Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes............................3-10 3.4 Unavoidable Significant Adverse Environmental Impacts ...............3-10 Alternatives ..........................................................................4-1 Documentation ......................................................................5-1 5.1 Persons Contacted................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Literature Cited...................................................................... 5-2 5.3 Document Preparation ............................................................. 5-4 Appendices (Bound separately) Appendix A NOP and Responses to NOP Appendix B Visual Analysis Appendix C Forest Management Plan Appendix D Biological Assessment Report Appendix E Geotechnical Investigation Appendix F Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Appendix G Drainage Analysis Appendix H Fiscal Impact Reports Appendix I Traffic Impact Analysis Appendix J Miscellaneous Traffic Information List of Figures Figure 1 Regional Location ................................................................ 1-7 Figure 2 Project Site.......................................................................... 1-9 Figure 3A Surrounding Area Photos ......................................................1-11 Figure 3B Surrounding Area Photos ......................................................1-13 Figure 4A Project Site Photos .............................................................. 1-17 Figure 4B Project Site Photos .............................................................. 1-19 Figure 4C Project Site Photos .............................................................. 1-21 Figure 5 Conceptual Golf Course Changes ........................................... 1-23 Figure 6 Seaside Residential Planning Area .......................................... 1-27 Figure 7 Seaside General Plan and Fort Ord Reuse Plan Land Use Designation ....................................................................... 1-29 Figure 8 Subdivision and Site Plan on Arial Photo.................................. 1-31 Figure 9A Overall Site Plan ................................................................. 1-33 Figure 9B Hotel, Timeshares, and Northern Residential ............................ 1-35 Figure 9C Western Residential Area...................................................... 1-37 Figure 9D Southern Residential Area..................................................... 1-39 Figure 10 Main Hotel Building Perspective ............................................ 1-43 Figure 11A Main Hotel Building Section and Elevation............................... 1-45 Figure 11B Bungalow Elevations ........................................................... 1-47 Figure 12 Timeshare Elevations........................................................... 1-49 Figure 13 Reconstructed Clubhouse Elevations ....................................... 1-53 Figure 14 Preliminary Phasing............................................................. 1-57 Figure 15 Street Cross Sections............................................................ 1-59 Figure 16 Percolation Ponds ............................................................... 1-63 Figure 17 Views from Monterey and Sand City .........................................2-7 Figure 18 Views from Adjacent Roads.....................................................2-9 Figure 19 North Central Air Basin Monitoring Stations ............................ 2-23 Figure 20 Location of Site 33 .............................................................. 2-61 Figure 21 Project Traffic Distribution.................................................. 2-123 Figure 22 Stilwell Park Alternative Conceptual Land Use ........................... 4-7 Figure 23 Revised Project Design Alternative..........................................4-15 List of Tables Table 1 Proposed Changes to Golf Links .............................................1-16 Table 2 Proposed Subdivision ...........................................................1-26 Table 3 Proposed Hotel Facilities.......................................................1-41 Table 4 Grading Quantities ..............................................................1-56 Table 5 Common Air Pollutants ........................................................2-19 Table 6 Federal & State Ambient Air Quality Standards..........................2-20 Table 7 Attainment Status of the North Central Coast Air Basin...............2-22 Table 8 Emission Rates for Heavy-Duty Diesel Powered Equipment..........2-25 Table 9 Estimated Project-Related Operational Emissions.......................2-26 Table 10 Special Status Plant and Wildlife Species Reported to Occur or with the Potential to Occur Within the Project Vicinity................2-36 Table 11 Approximate Golf Course Parcel Tree Coverage.........................2-39 Table 12 Approximate Tree Loss by Project Component...........................2-41 Table 13 Significant Faults in the Vicinity of the Project Site ....................2-54 Table 14 Sensitive Receptors and Associated Land Uses ...........................2-79 Table 15 FHWA Noise Abatement Criteria ...........................................2-80 Table 16 Land Use Compatibility Criteria for Exterior Community Noise ....2-81 Table 17 Noise Level Performance Standards for Non Transportation Noise Sources .....................................................................2-82 Table 18 Noise Levels Generated by Typical Construction Equipment ........ 2-84 Table 19 Projected Annual Fire Services Demand in the Seaside Portion of the Former Fort Ord......................................................... 2-94 Table 20 Project Annual Police Services Demand in the Seaside Portion of the Former Fort Ord ........................................................... 2-99 Table 21 Public Works Existing Plant & Equipment...............................2-100 Table 22 Project Share of Parks Demand in the Seaside Portion of the Former Fort Ord ................................................................2-103 Table 23 Improvements Recommended in Draft State Highway 1 PSR .......2-116 Table 24 Study Road Network Intersections Jurisdiction & Description .....2-117 Table 25 Study Road Network Road Segments Jurisdiction and Description.......................................................................2-118 Table 26 Intersection LOS Standards & Existing Conditions ....................2-119 Table 27 Road Segment
Recommended publications
  • Trend Report on Travel After 2020
    in collaboration with GLOBETRENDER Travel Trend Report October 2020 travel after 2020 what will tourism look like in our new reality? table of contents Co-authors Damon Embling World Affairs Reporter, Euronews Damon is a seasoned journalist, specialising in travel and tourism. He regularly reports from key global industry events including ITB Berlin and WTM London and moderates high-profile debates on the future of the sectors. Most recently, these have included a special virtual series for Euronews and a debate session for Brand USA Travel Week Europe 2020. Damon has also presented several travel programmes for Euronews, from across Europe and Asia. Jenny Southan, Editor & Founder of travel trend forecasting agency Globetrender Jenny Southan is editor and founder of Globetrender, a travel trend forecasting agency and online magazine dedicated to the future of travel. Jenny is also a public speaker and freelance journalist who writes for publications including Conde Nast Traveller, The Telegraph and Mr Porter. Previously she was features editor of Business Traveller magazine for ten years. Contributor Eva zu Beck Euronews Travel Contributor Eva zu Beck is an adventure YouTuber and travel TV host with a community of 2 million fans across her social media channels. She travels to countries rarely covered by mainstream media, and tells the stories of overcoming challenges in some of the planet’s most remote places. table of contents 2 introduction Hit hard by the global Covid-19 pandemic, the travel and tourism sectors are facing a rapidly changing future. As brands and businesses look to recover losses, there’s also a need to re-think their offerings, amid changing consumer behaviour and habits.
    [Show full text]
  • GRAND TOUR of PORTUGAL Beyond Return Date FEATURING the D OURO RIVER VALLEY & PORTUGUESE RIVIERA
    Durgan Travel presents… VALID 11 Days / 9 Nights PASSPORT REQUIRED Must be valid for 6 mos. GRAND TOUR OF PORTUGAL beyond return date FEATURING THE D OURO RIVER VALLEY & PORTUGUESE RIVIERA Your choice of departures: April ~ Early May ~ October $ $ TBA* for payment by credit card TBA* for payment by cash/check Rates are per person, twin occupancy, and INCLUDE $TBA in air taxes, fees, and fuel surcharges (subject to change). OUR GRAND TOUR OF PORTUGAL TOUR ITINERARY: DAY 1 – BOSTON~PORTUGAL: Depart Boston’s Logan International Airport aboard our transatlantic flight to Porto, Portugal (via intermediate city) with full meal and beverage service, as well as stereo headsets, available in flight. DAY 2 – PORTO, PORTUGAL: Upon arrival at Francisco Carneiro Airport in Porto, we will meet our Tour Escort, who will help with our transfer. We’ll board our private motorcoach and enjoy a panoramic sightseeing tour en route to our 4-star hotel, which is centrally located. After check-in, the remainder of the day is at leisure. Prior to dinner this evening, we will gather for a Welcome Drink. Dinner and overnight. (D) DAY 3 – PORTO: After breakfast at our hotel, we are off for a full day of guided sightseeing in Porto, Portugal’s second largest city, situated on the right bank of the Douro River. Our tour begins in the Foz area near the mouth of the river. Next, we will visit Pol ácio da Bolsa (the stock exchange) , the Old Trade Hall, the Gold Room, the Arabian Hall, the Clerigos Tower, and Cais da Bibeira.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose and Scope 1.2 Description of Tahoe Donner Association
    Administrative Draft Tahoe Donner Association Master Plan 1 Introduction The stated mission of the Tahoe Donner Association (the Association or TDA) establishes “…a vibrant mountain community providing attractive and well‐maintained facilities, events & other programs to its members, guests and the public while maintaining and improving accessible natural lands in and around the housing development and associated facilities.” Tahoe Donner is a year‐round community with a passion for outdoor recreation and is one of California’s largest homeowner’s associations. Since the early 1970s, the Association has developed extensive recreation centers and opportunities to support their mission. In recent years the community has been engaged in a series of forward looking planning efforts. These planning efforts were considered as the current document was developed and benefitted from this previous work. Such efforts include: 2013 Tahoe Donner Trails Master Plan 2015 Tahoe Donner Trails 5‐Year Implementation Plan Tahoe Donner Strategic Plan (2010) 2030 General Plan (2011) Town of Truckee Trails & Bikeways Master Plan (2007) 1.1 Purpose and Scope One of the stated purposes of TDA’s2030 General Plan is “Continuously maintaining and upgrading amenities to benefit the membership and capture public use and revenue, while still giving members priority and preference, is highly desirable.” The purpose of this document is to help the Association look forward by developing a clear investment vision for capital projects and associated upgrades and service expansions over the next 10 – 20 years. It is designed to prepare a framework for TDA to respond and improve efficiently with future demographic changes. This assessment includes input gathered from board, committees, members, and staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Creative Resources for Attractive Seaside Resorts: the French Turn
    Journal of Investment and Management 2015; 4(1-1): 78-86 Published online February 11, 2015 (http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/jim) doi: 10.11648/j.jim.s.2015040101.20 ISSN: 2328-7713 (Print); ISSN: 2328-7721 (Online) Creative resources for attractive seaside resorts: The French turn Anne Gombault 1, Ludovic Falaix 2, Emeline Hatt 3, Jérôme Piriou 4 1Research Cluster for Creative Industries, KEDGE Business School, Bordeaux-Marseille, France 2Laboratoire ACTé EA 4281, Blaise Pascal University, Clermont-Ferrand France 3Laboratoire interdisciplinaire en urbanisme – EA 889, Aix Marseille Univeristy, Aix Marseille, France 4Tourism Management Institute, La Rochelle Business School, La Rochelle, France Email address: [email protected] (A. Gombault), [email protected] (L. Falaix), [email protected] (E. Hatt), [email protected] (J. Piriou) To cite this article: Anne Gombault, Ludovic Falaix, Emeline Hatt, Jérôme Piriou. Creative Resources for Attractive Seaside Resorts: The French Turn. Journal of Investment and Management. Special Issue: Attractiveness and Governance of Tourist Destinations. Vol. 4, No. 1-1, 2015, pp. 78-86. doi: 10.11648/j.jim.s.2015040101.20 Abstract: This article presents a qualitative analysis of the specific strategies used by coastal resorts in the South of France to valorise their creative regional resources. These strategies emerge from factors of change in the trajectories of the resorts: change in the relationship between man and nature, environmental turning point and the need for sustainability, emergence of creative tourism centred on recreation, sport and culture. The research is supported by three case studies, Biarritz, Lacanau and Martigues, and assesses the constraints that arise in terms of design and management of coastal resorts and tourist areas, against a background of numerous conflicting requirements, including attractiveness and sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Wellbeing Tourism and Its Potential in Case Regions of the South Baltic
    Wellbeing tourism and its potential in case regions of the South Baltic Lithuania - Poland - Sweden Lindell, L. (ed.), Dziadkiewicz, A., Sattari, S., Misiune, I., Pereira, P., Granbom, A., 2019. 2 EDITOR: Lindell, L.1 AUTHORS: Lindell, L.1, Dziadkiewicz, A.2, Sattari, S.1, Misiune, I.3, Pereira, P.4, and, Granbom, A.1 1 Linnaeus University, Sweden. 2 Gdansk University, Poland. 3 Vilnius University, Lithuania. 4 Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania. Main author contribution for each theme: Introduction: Lindell, L. Wellbeing tourism concept: Lindell, L. Lithuania: Dziadkiewicz, A., Misiune, I., & Pereira, P. Poland: Dziadkiewicz, A. Sweden: Sattari, S. IMAGE Royalty-free by Bigstockphoto. PUBLISHED BY: Linnaeus University (Lnu) 391 82 Kalmar 351 95 Växjö Tel.: +46 0772-28 80 00 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.lnu.se ISBN: 978-91-89283-05-3 (pdf) Version 1.0, 31th of October 2019. © 2019 Linnaeus University (Lnu), and authors This report was produced with financial support from the Swedish Institute, SI, that encourage projects that focus on cross border challenges that fit in to the theme: ”Save the Sea, connect the region, increase prosperity”. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the Swedish Institute. 3 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 7 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    2004 Annual Report Proven Performance... $409 $3,893 $2,775 $260 $2,329 $2,230 $214 $220 $1,814 $146 $1,464 $1,211 $102 $972 $85 $5,641 $761 $4,434 $65 $646 $50 $54 $504 $36 $395 $28 $281 $17 $200 $177 $10 $5 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 199719981999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 199719981999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 $3,476 Net Income (in millions) Total Revenues (in millions) $2,632 FYE October 31 FYE October 31 $2,734 1990–2004 1990–2004 CAAGR–30.4%* CAAGR–23.6%* $1,859 $2,135 $2,159 $1,426 $1,404 $1,628 $1,383 $1,054 $1,069 $815 $885 $627 $1,920 $526 $587 $660 $491 $371 $401 $343 $285 $230 220 $187 $164 $70 $124 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 199719981999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 200 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 199719981999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Contracts (in millions) $1,477 Backlog (in millions) 170 FYE October 31 FYE October 31 155 1990–2004 146 1990–2004 CAAGR–27.0%* 140 $1,130 CAAGR–34.5%* 122 116 $913 100 97 $745 80 $616 67 62 $526 $385 41 42 $315 $257 $204 $167 $136 $95 $118 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 199719981999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 199719981999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Number of Selling Communities Shareholders’ Equity (in millions) FYE October 31 FYE October 31 1990–2004 1990–2004 CAAGR–12.8%* CAAGR–24.0%* *CAAGR – Compound Average Annual Growth Rate ...A Solid Business Plan..
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 27. Tourism and Recreation Group of Experts: Alan Simcock
    Chapter 27. Tourism and Recreation Group of Experts: Alan Simcock (Lead member) and Lorna Inniss 1. Introduction Seaside holidays have a long history. They were popular for several hundred years (100 BCE – 400) among the ruling classes of the Roman Empire: these visited the coast of Campania, the Bay of Naples, Capri and Sicily for swimming, boating, recreational fishing and generally lounging about (Balsdon, 1969). But thereafter seaside holidaying largely fell out of fashion. In the mid-18th century, the leisured classes again began frequenting seaside resorts, largely as a result of the health benefits proclaimed by Dr. Richard Russell of Brighton, England, in 1755 (Russell, 1755). Seaside resorts such as Brighton and Weymouth developed in England, substantially helped by the royal patronage of Kings George III and George IV of Great Britain (Brandon, 1974). After the end of the Napoleonic wars, similar developments took place across Europe, for example at Putbus, on the island of Rügen in Germany (Lichtnau, 1996). The development of railway and steamship networks led both to the development of long-distance tourism for the wealthy, with the rich of northern Europe going to the French Riviera, and to more local mass tourism, with new seaside resorts growing up to serve the working classes of industrialised towns in all countries where industrialisation took place. In England, whole towns would close down for a “wakes week”, and a large part of the population would move to seaside resorts to take a holiday: for example, in 1860 in north-west England, 23,000 travelled from the one town of Oldham alone for a week in the seaside resort of Blackpool (Walton, 1983).
    [Show full text]
  • Sex Tourism: Do Women Do It Too?
    Leisure Studies ISSN: 0261-4367 (Print) 1466-4496 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rlst20 Sex tourism: do women do it too? Sheila Jeffreys To cite this article: Sheila Jeffreys (2003) Sex tourism: do women do it too?, Leisure Studies, 22:3, 223-238, DOI: 10.1080/026143603200075452 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/026143603200075452 Published online: 01 Dec 2010. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 3869 View related articles Citing articles: 60 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rlst20 Leisure Studies 22 (July 2003) 223–238 Sex tourism: do women do it too? SHEILA JEFFREYS Department of Political Science, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia This article examines a recent tendency amongst researchers of sex tourism to include women within the ranks of sex tourists in destinations such as the Caribbean and Indonesia. It argues that a careful attention to the power relations, context, meanings and effects of the behaviours of male and female tourists who engage in sexual relations with local people, makes it clear that the differences are profound. The similarities and differences are analysed here with the conclusion that it is the different positions of men and women in the sex class hierarchy that create such differences. The political ideas that influence the major protagonists in this debate to include or exclude women will be examined. The article ends with a consideration of the problematic implications of arguing that women do it too.
    [Show full text]
  • Rental Guidelines
    Rental Guidelines The guest, including all members of the guest’s party understands and agrees: Upon confirming a reservation, a contractual agreement is made between Resort Vacation Properties of St. George Island, Inc. and the guest, including all members of the guest’s party. The guest and the rest of their party agree to abide by the following Rental Guidelines: Maximum Occupancy: At all times, both inside and outside the home, the maximum occupancy is the number of persons allowed on the premises, including infants. We cater to family groups and cannot accept reservations for vacationing students or house parties. We do not rent to students even if one or more parents or legally responsible adults accompany them, or to groups under the age of 25. This policy is strictly enforced. Special events such as weddings, reunions, and church retreats are only allowed in select homes and require a separate contract. Special pricing and security deposits may be required. Please contact our office for details. Pets: Guests may bring up to 2 pets to our pet-friendly homes unless otherwise noted in an individual property description. Guests must obtain special permission, and a fee of $100 will be charged, for each pet that exceeds the amount allowed as outlined above or as specified in an individual property description. Guests are required to clean up after their pets, and there may be additional charges if pet waste is left on the property. Franklin County law prohibits leaving pet waste on the beach or dunes. Pets in non-pet-friendly homes are strictly prohibited and will result in immediate eviction with no refund of rent.
    [Show full text]
  • Twixt Ocean and Pines : the Seaside Resort at Virginia Beach, 1880-1930 Jonathan Mark Souther
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Master's Theses Student Research 5-1996 Twixt ocean and pines : the seaside resort at Virginia Beach, 1880-1930 Jonathan Mark Souther Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/masters-theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Souther, Jonathan Mark, "Twixt ocean and pines : the seaside resort at Virginia Beach, 1880-1930" (1996). Master's Theses. Paper 1037. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TWIXT OCEAN AND PINES: THE SEASIDE RESORT AT VIRGINIA BEACH, 1880-1930 Jonathan Mark Souther Master of Arts University of Richmond, 1996 Robert C. Kenzer, Thesis Director This thesis descnbes the first fifty years of the creation of Virginia Beach as a seaside resort. It demonstrates the importance of railroads in promoting the resort and suggests that Virginia Beach followed a similar developmental pattern to that of other ocean resorts, particularly those ofthe famous New Jersey shore. Virginia Beach, plagued by infrastructure deficiencies and overshadowed by nearby Ocean View, did not stabilize until its promoters shifted their attention from wealthy northerners to Tidewater area residents. After experiencing difficulties exacerbated by the Panic of 1893, the burning of its premier hotel in 1907, and the hesitation bred by the Spanish American War and World War I, Virginia Beach enjoyed robust growth during the 1920s. While Virginia Beach is often perceived as a post- World War II community, this thesis argues that its prewar foundation was critical to its subsequent rise to become the largest city in Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • [Project Title]
    SCREENCHECK DRAFT INITIAL STUDY Joby Aviation Manufacturing Facility File No. DR 2019-27 January 2020 Prepared with Prepared By: the Assistance of: City of Marina Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc. 209 Cypress Avenue 947 Cass Street, Suite 5 Marina, California 93933 Monterey, California 93940 Contact: Christine Hopper Contact: Josh Harwayne This page was left intentionally blank. Table of Contents I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................................................................... 1 II. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ................................... 3 A. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 3 B. PROJECT LOCATION ................................................................................................................................... 3 C. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................. 6 D. OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT .............................................................................................. 8 E. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE, STAGING, AND EQUIPMENT ............................................................ 13 F. PROJECT APPROVALS AND PERMITS REQUIRED ............................................................................. 13 III. PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL AND STATE PLANS AND MANDATED LAWS .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Airports Economics Impacts Study Final 2003
    Airports Economic Impacts Study for Monterey, San Benito and Santa Cruz Counties August 13, 2003 Prepared by the Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments and funded, in part, by the Federal Aviation Administration AMBAG Airports Economic Impact Study Executive Summary The Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments (AMBAG) received grant funding from the Federal Aviation Administration to complete an economic analysis of the regional importance of the six public airports serving the AMBAG region (Monterey, San Benito and Santa Cruz Counties). Of the region’s airports, the Monterey Peninsula Airport is the only scheduled air carrier airport in the region while all six airports serve general aviation purposes. These airports are: Hollister Municipal Airport: Located in the northern end of the city of Hollister and operated by the City for general aviation. Marina Municipal Airport: After the closure of Fort Ord, the City of Marina was conveyed Fritzsche Army Airfield in 1995. The City reopened the airport as a municipal general aviation airport. Mesa Del Rey (King City) Airport: Located in south Monterey County, this airport is operated by the City of King for general aviation. Monterey Peninsula Airport: The Monterey Peninsula Airport District operates this facility on the Monterey Peninsula. The District is composed of the Cities of Carmel-by- the-Sea, Monterey, Pacific Grove, Seaside, Sand City, Del Rey Oaks and portions of the Monterey County unincorporated area. This airport supports general aviation and commercial, air carrier traffic. Salinas Municipal Airport: The City of Salinas operates this general aviation airport located within their sphere of influence in Monterey County.
    [Show full text]