DOCSLIB.ORG

NTD Small Systems Manual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NTD Small Systems Manual 2013 Reporting Year NTD National Transit Database Small Systems Waiver Reporting Manual Office of Budget and Policy September 2013 Federal Transit Administration U.S. Department of Transportation 2013 Small Systems Waiver Reporting Manual Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 What is the National Transit Database? .................................................................................................................. 1 Reporting Manuals and Modules ............................................................................................................................ 1 FY 2013 Annual Reporting Changes and Clarifications .......................................................................................... 1 Who Reports, What to Report, How to Report, When to Report, and Where to Report .......................................... 1 New Reporters ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 Reference Information ............................................................................................................................................ 1 What is the National Transit Database? ..................................................................................................................... 2 Legislative Requirement ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Funding for Transit Agencies Serving Urbanized Areas ......................................................................................... 2 Reporting Manuals and Modules ................................................................................................................................ 3 FY 2013 Annual Reporting Changes and Clarifications .............................................................................................. 3 Who Reports............................................................................................................................................................... 3 Purchased Transportation Services ........................................................................................................................ 4 Voluntary Reporters ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Extensions, Waivers and Special Requests ............................................................................................................ 4 Extension Requests ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Waivers and Special Requests ............................................................................................................................ 5 Small Systems Waiver – 30 or Fewer Vehicles ............................................................................................... 5 Natural Disaster Hold Harmless Adjustment .................................................................................................... 5 Data, Report or Passenger Miles Traveled Sampling Waivers ........................................................................ 6 Special Request – Strikes ................................................................................................................................ 6 What to Report ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 Reporting Modules and Forms ................................................................................................................................ 7 Declarations ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 Fiscal Year Data ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 How to Report ............................................................................................................................................................. 7 The NTD Identification Number ............................................................................................................................... 8 Internet Reporting ................................................................................................................................................... 8 Reporting Format ................................................................................................................................................ 8 General Formatting Rules ................................................................................................................................... 8 Accounting Requirements ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) ............................................................................................. 8 Accrual Accounting .............................................................................................................................................. 9 Reporting Purchased Transportation ...................................................................................................................... 9 When to Report .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 Reporting Timelines .............................................................................................................................................. 10 Reminder Notices ................................................................................................................................................. 10 Failure to Report: No Report, Late Report, or Incomplete Report ......................................................................... 10 Where to Report ....................................................................................................................................................... 11 Table of Contents — i 2013 Small Systems Waiver Reporting Manual NTD Help Desk ..................................................................................................................................................... 11 New Reporters .......................................................................................................................................................... 11 Written Request .................................................................................................................................................... 12 Reference Information .............................................................................................................................................. 12 Transit Terminology and Parameters .................................................................................................................... 12 Public Transportation ........................................................................................................................................ 13 Modes................................................................................................................................................................ 13 Type of Service (TOS) ....................................................................................................................................... 13 Transit Agency .................................................................................................................................................. 14 Area Definitions ................................................................................................................................................. 14 Maximum Service Vehicles ............................................................................................................................... 14 Reference Documents .......................................................................................................................................... 14 Internet Reporting ............................................................................................................................................ 16 Overview .................................................................................................................................................................. 16 What Has Changed from Prior Years .................................................................................................................... 16 Internet Reporting System Security ...................................................................................................................... 16 Detailed Instructions ................................................................................................................................................. 16 Accessing Internet Reporting ...............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bus & Motorcoach News
    August 15, 2004 THE NEWS RESOURCE FOR THE BUS AND MOTORCOACH INDUSTRY LimoLiner appears on verge of success Operators BOSTON — LimoLiner may just turn out to be the “little luxury face tight coach that could.” Approaching the end of its first year of operation, the luxury bus security service that operates between the Delays, canceled trips and re- business centers of New York and routings were the norm for many Boston not only is still around but motorcoach operators and their it’s even grown. passengers in New York and Wash- Since it began making the ington early this month as a federal 200-mile, four-hour run last Octo- terrorist alert spawned new traffic ber, LimoLiner has expanded to restrictions and increased inspections. a seven-day-a-week operation by Operators reported that many of adding Sunday service. and it has the problems in the New York area purchased a third coach for its were caused by the closing of the fleet. Holland Tunnel, Williamsburg “We’re not breaking even yet, Bridge and Brooklyn Battery Tun- but we are growing steadily,” says operators say is among the tough- habits has proven to be a major marketing program that zeros in on nel to commercial traffic. founder and owner Fergus est in the industry — has not come challenge for the fledging compa- the business communities in the The crackdowns during the first McCann. “Sure we would like to easy, though. ny. two cities with targeted advertise- week of August were said to be even grow faster but we believe we are “This is a brand new concept To draw riders from the trains ments in local newspapers and more intense than in the months on track.” and we have to get established,” and planes that also shuttle busi- business magazines, some radio after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Good Repair Performance Measures: Assessing Asset Condition, Age, and Performance Data Final Report
    State of Good Repair Performance Measures: Assessing Asset Condition, Age, and Performance Data Final Report June 2016 Project No. 2117-9060-02-B PREPARED FOR National Center for Transit Research (NCTR) II State of Good Repair Performance Measures: Assessing Asset Condition, Age, and Performance Data Final Report Prepared for: National Center for Transit Research University of South Florida Joel Volinski, Project Manager Prepared by: Lehman Center for Transportation Research (LCTR) Florida International University (FIU) 10555 West Flagler Street, EC 3609 Miami, FL 33174 Fabian Cevallos, Ph.D. Transit Program Director Phone: (305) 348-3144 Email: [email protected] June 2016 i II Disclaimer The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the University of South Florida’s National Center for Transit Research (NCTR) in the interest of information exchange. The University of South Florida and the National Center for Transit Research assume no liability for the contents or use thereof. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Center for Transit Research. ii II TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date June 2016 State of Good Repair Performance Measures: Assessing Asset Condition, Age, and Performance Data 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Fabian Cevallos, Ph.D. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Buses Involved in Fatal Accidents Codebook 2004
    UMTRI-2007-29 JUNE 2007 BUSES INVOLVED IN FATAL ACCIDENTS CODEBOOK 2004 ANNE MATTESON DANIEL HERSHBERGER PAUL E. GREEN JOHN WOODROOFFE CENTER FOR NATIONAL TRUCK AND BUS STATISTICS UMTRI-2007-29 BUSES INVOLVED IN FATAL ACCIDENTS CODEBOOK 2004 (Version May 16, 2007) Anne Matteson Daniel Hershberger Paul E. Green John Woodrooffe Center for National Truck and Bus Statistics University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute June 2007 The research reported herein was conducted under general research funds provided by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the U.S. Department of Transportation or the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. ii Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. UMTRI-2007-29 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date BUSES INVOLVED IN FATAL ACCIDENTS June 2007 CODEBOOK 2004 6. Performing Organization Code (Version May 16, 2007) 7. Authors 8. Performing Organization Report No. Anne Matteson, Daniel Hershberger, Paul E. Green and John UMTRI-2007-29 Woodrooffe 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. University of Michigan 052701 Transportation Research Institute 11. Contract or Grant No. 2901 Baxter Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan DTMC75-06-H-00003 48109-2150 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered U.S. Department of Transportation Special Report Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Task A 400 Seventh Street, S.W. 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D.C. 20590 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract This report provides documentation for UMTRI’s file of Buses Involved in Fatal Accidents (BIFA), 2004, including distributions of the code values for each variable in the file.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Technology Equipment Manufacturers*
    Advanced Technology Equipment Manufacturers* Revised 04/21/2020 On-Road (Medium/Heavy Duty, Terminal Tractors) OEM Model Technology Vocations GVWR Type Altec Industries, Inc Altec 12E8 JEMS ePTO ePTO ePTO, Utility > 33,000, 26,001 - 33,000 New Altec Industries, Inc Altec JEMS 1820 and 18E20 ePTO ePTO ePTO, Utility > 33,000, 26,001 - 33,000 New Altec Industries, Inc Altec JEMS 4E4 with 3.6 kWh Battery ePTO ePTO, Utility 16,001-19,500, 19,501-26,000 New Altec Industries, Inc Altec JEMS 6E6 with 3.6 kWh Battery ePTO ePTO, Utility 16,001-19,500, 19,501-26,000 New Autocar Autocar 4x2 and 6x4 Xpeditor with Cummins-Westport ISX12N Engine Near-Zero Engine Truck > 33,001 New Autocar Autocar 4x2 and 6x4 Xpeditor with Cummins-Westport L9N Engine Near-Zero Engine Refuse > 33,001 New Blue Bird Blue Bird Electric Powered All American School Bus Zero Emission Bus, School Bus > 30,000 New Blue Bird Blue Bird Electric Powered Vision School Bus 4x2 Configuration Zero Emission Bus, School Bus > 30,000 New BYD Motors BYD 8Y Electric Yard Tractor Zero Emission Terminal Truck 81,000 New BYD Motors BYD C10 45' All-Electric Coach Bus Zero Emission Bus 49,604 New BYD Motors BYD C10MS 45' All-Electric Double-Decker Coach Bus Zero Emission Transit Bus 45' New BYD Motors BYD C6 23' All-Electric Coach Bus Zero Emission Bus 18,331 New BYD Motors BYD K11 60' Articulated All-Electric Transit Bus Zero Emission Bus 65,036 New BYD Motors BYD K7M 30' All-Electric Transit Bus Zero Emission Bus, Transit Bus 30' New BYD Motors BYD K9 40' All-Electric Transit Bus Zero Emission
    [Show full text]
  • January 14, 2021 – 3Pm Via Teleconference
    CITIZENS’ BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Riverside Community College District January 14, 2021 – 3pm Via teleconference: https://youtube.com/channel/UCGDo8aLHnvj4U5DspeHQjJA ORDER OF BUSINESS Pledge of Allegiance Pursuant to Governor Newsom’s Executive Order N-29-20, dated March 17, 2020, members of the Citizens’ Bond Oversight Committee (CBOC), staff and the public may participate in the CBOC meeting via teleconference. No in-person attendance will be accommodated or permitted. To avoid exposure to COVID-19 this meeting will be held via live streaming on the District’s YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/channel/UCGDo8aLHnvj4U5DspeHQjJA Should you wish to participate in public comments, please submit your comments/requests electronically by emailing [email protected]. I. Call to Order II. Public Comments CBOC invites comments from the public regarding any matters within the jurisdiction of the CBOC. Pursuant to the Ralph M. Brown Act, the CBOC cannot address or respond to comments made under Public Comment. III. Approval of Minutes a. Minutes from October 15, 2020 Recommended Action: Approval IV. Measure C Financial Update a. Project Commitments Summary Report as of December 31, 2020 Information Only b. Capital Program Executive Summary (CPES) Report October 1 to December 31, 2020 Information Only V. Measure C Projects Update a. Board Reports – October to December 2020 Using Measure C Funding Information Only b. Measure C Project Summary Status Updates Information Only VI. Business from Committee Members a. Bylaws Ad Hoc Committee Presentation
    [Show full text]
  • Hvy Dty Veh & Eng Res. Guide
    The U.S. Department Of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency And Renewable Energy’s National Alternative Fuels Hotline Heavy-Duty Vehicle and Engine Resource Guide This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTACT THE HOTLINE 800-423-1DOE • 703-528-3500 FAX: 703-528-1953 EMAIL: [email protected] Introduction Engine manufacturers are moving forward when it comes to alternative fuel engine technology. This model year (MY96), heavy-duty engine manufacturers are offering a number of natural gas models with additional models nearing production. Electric vehicle manufacturers have several products available with new models nearing completion. Although Caterpillar is the only manufacturer offering propane as a fuel option, Detroit Diesel Corp. (DDC) will be demonstrating a prototype model in 1996, and Cummins will release a model within MY96. Many manufacturers are offering natural gas engines in response to California Air Resource Board’s strict bus emission standards which are effective MY96.
    [Show full text]
  • Conversionsbcm
    May 2019 ConversionsBCM My Beach House on Wheels DIY Solar InstalL By Debbie Breaux By Karen Riffel Dirty Truth About Compost Toilet’s Traveling in Mexico By Morgan Crabtree By Gary Hatt 2 BCM BUS CONVERSION May 2019 PUBLISHER’S NOTE BCM - Print Editions that. Many companies, including the one I was at, had transitioned over to It was very unfortunate to have to stop online training so you have to be at a sending out print copies of BCM to our computer to track your time, complete customers. It took me over a year to employee training, and just about GARY HATT make that decision. We lost a few customers who were everything else required to complete not able to access the digital edition, either because they your job. So now, most people are have no computer, no email, or have no access to the familiar with online content. internet. We hate to lose even one customer but some- times you have to make sacrifices to sustain a business. When we went all-digital at BCM we also closed our brick- I love to read a print magazine as well as everyone else, n-mortar office and put all of our old print magazines in but we had a choice of either shutting down the magazine storage. We send a box out to many rallies now, along with completely or going to an all-digital format and keep the a note saying we are now all-digital, along with a subscrip- magazine going financially. tion form and many people sign up as a result of seeing our magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • Top Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Stories of 2018
    Top Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Stories of 2018 California In 2018, California witnessed several achievements and milestones. Please note that a few of these are featured elsewhere in our list under Hydrogen Infrastructure. Starting off the year, then Governor Jerry Brown called for a goal of 5,000,000 zero-emission vehicles by 2030 in California, setting a number of ambitious goals for the Golden State. His executive order also called for 200 hydrogen stations by 2025. The California Fuel Cell Partnership released “The California Fuel Cell Revolution,” that calls for, among other things, 1,000 hydrogen stations serving upwards of 1,000,000 fuel cell electric vehicles by 2030. The document also explores the synergies between light-duty and heavy-duty fueling infrastructure, the opportunities for renewable hydrogen and the role of hydrogen in the increasingly renewable electrical grid. The California Air Resources Board approved a Low Carbon Fuel Standard infrastructure credit for hydrogen fueling and charging infrastructure that is set to be implemented in 2019. It is expected, among other policy measures, to spur infrastructure investment and greater capacity. California exceeded 5,000 fuel cell electric vehicles-mostly passenger cars-on its roads, more than Japan or Germany which had more hydrogen stations. Hydrogen stations opened in Palo Alto, LAX area, Citrus Heights, Emeryville, Newport Beach, Ontario, Thousand Oaks and Mountain View. Hydrogen station capacity increased in 2018, and more stations with greater capacity will be opening in 2019 and beyond. California continues to lead in North America in the bus category. The California Air Resources Board approved an Innovative Clean Transit regulation, putting transit agencies on the pathway to zero-emissions, fuel cell and battery electric.
    [Show full text]
  • CARB Zero-Emission Airport Shuttle Bus Current Manufacturers* As of 02/07/2018
    CARB Zero-Emission Airport Shuttle Bus Current Manufacturers* as of 02/07/2018 Class (Weight ZEV Manufacture* Sales Contact Technology Vehicle Type Capacity Range) Class 3 Office: (800) 630-9833 Zenith Battery Electric Van 9-16 Zenith-Motors.com (10,050 lbs-14,000 lbs) Office: (949) 220-6491 BYD Battery Electric Coach 20-80 Class 4-5 BYD.com (14,001 lbs-19,500 lbs) Phoenix Motorcars See above Battery Electric Cutaway 12-18 BYD See above Battery Electric Bus, Coach 20-80 Office: (909) 591-9557 Eldorado National (ENC) Hydrogen Bus 50-60 eldorado-ca.com Phone (510) 785-1500 Gillig Battery Electric Bus 60 Gillig.com Class 6-8 Office: (818) 818-1327 Greenpowerbus Battery Electric Bus, Coach 25-120 greenpowerbus.com (19,501lbs and Up) Cell: 909-560-1541 New Flyer Battery Electric Bus 80 newflyer.com Cell: (518) (518) 572- NOVA Bus 5034 Battery Electric Bus 60 (not yet available) volvo.com Cell: (310) 601-6751 Proterra Battery Electric Bus 60 proterra.com * This document conveying zero-emission shuttle manufacturers currently for sale in California shall not be used as a CARB endorsement of these products. CARB Zero-Emission Airport Shuttle Bus Current Manufacturers* as of 02/07/2018 Class (Weight ZEV Conversion Sales Contact Conversion Product Capacity Range) Manufacture* Class 3 Lightning Ford van converted to electric drivetrain Not yet available 8-15 Systems powered by batteries. (10,050 lbs-14,000 lbs) Class 4-5 Cell: (650) 730-7604 Ford c utaway converted to electric Motiv, Ameritrans 20 motivps.com drivetrain powered by batteries (14,001 lbs-19,500 lbs) Office: 951-684-9585 Gillig or New Flyer vehicles converted to Complete Coach Works Ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Manual
    2016 Report Year NTD National Transit Database Policy Manual Office of Budget and Policy August 2016 Federal Transit Administration U.S. Department of Transportation 2016 NTD Policy Manual Table of Contents Report Year 2016 Policy Changes and Reporting Clarifications ..................................... 1 Extension Requests .................................................................................................... 1 Safe Operations .......................................................................................................... 1 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) Data ................................................... 1 Sub-recipient Self-Reporting ....................................................................................... 2 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 3 The National Transit Database ................................................................................... 4 History .................................................................................................................... 4 NTD Data ................................................................................................................ 5 Data Use and Funding ............................................................................................ 7 Failure to Report ..................................................................................................... 9 Inaccurate Data ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Vehicle (For U.S 2020-2021)
    INDEX SHOCK ABSORBER LISTINGS BY MAKE&MODEL NEW ADDITIONS V1-V29 TRUCKS, TRAILERS AND SUSPENSIONS 1-148 ADVANCE MIXER 1 ARVIN MERITOR 1 AUTOCAR 1-2 BENSON TRUCK BODIES INC. 2 BENSON TRAILER 2 BERING TRUCK CORP. 2 BINKLEY 2 BOYDSTUN 2 BROCKWAY 2 BUILT RITE 2 CASCADE TRAILER 2 CHALLENGE COOK 3 CHALMERS SUSPENSION 3 CHANCE COACH 3 CHEVROLET 3-10 CLARK EQUIPMENT 10 CNH GLOBAL N V 10 COACHMEN RV 10-11 CONTINENTAL TRAILWAYS-EAGLE INT'L 11 CUNHA PRODUCTS OHD 11 CUSH CORPORATION 11 COUNTRY COACH 11 CRANE CARRIER 11 CROWN COACH 11 DAMON MOTOR COACH 12 DANA 12 DEXTER AXLE 12 DIAMOND 12 DUPLEX TRUCK 12 DURA SUSPENSION 12 DODGE 12-13 DYNAMAX CORP 13 EAGLE MOTOR COACH 13 EAST TRAILER 13 EAST MANUFACTURING CORP 13 ENTEGRA COACH 14 FEDERAL COACH 14 Ⅰ INDEX SHOCK ABSORBER LISTINGS BY MAKE&MODEL FLEETWOOD RV 14 FLUIDRIVE 14 FLYER INDUSTRIES 14 FOREST RIVER INC 14-15 FORD 15-25 FREIGHTLINER 26-34 FRUEHAUF 34-35 FWD TRUCK 35 GENERAL TRAILER CO. 35 GEORGIE BOY MANUFACTURING 35 GILLIG BROS 35 GULF STREAM COACH 35 GREAT DANE TRAILER 35-36 GRANNING SUSPENSION 36 GMC 36-45 HARDEE 45 HAUSMAN 45 HENDRICKSON 45-55 HINO 55-57 HIGHWAY PRODUCT 57 HOLLAND 57 HOLIDAY RAMBLER 57-58 HOBBS TRAILERS 58 HUTCHENS SUSPENSION 58 HYSTER EQUIPMENT 58 IMT CORP 58 INTERNATIONAL (NAVISTAR) 58-74 INGERSOLL AXLES 74 ISUZU 74-75 JAYCO RV INC 75 JIFFLOX 75 KING 76 KIMBLE MIXER CO. 76 KING OF THE ROAD 76 KENWORTH 76-85 KWK-LOC (JIFFLOX) 85 LEYLAND TRUCK 86 LODAL INC.
    [Show full text]
  • FTA Awards Lift Grants to 128 Coach Companies UMA Motorcoach Expo 2011
    Happy New Year – See you at Expo! January 1, 2011 New safety system launched Expert: Don’t ignore new system WASHINGTON — The Federal Motor gram will allow it and other enforcement ASHBURN, Va. — The national roll out “Customers may be looking at this data Carrier Safety Administration says it took a agencies to reach more carriers earlier and of the federal government’s new Compli- when deciding which companies to use, es- major step toward improving commercial deploy a range of corrective interventions to ance Safety Accountability program for op- pecially in passenger movements,” warns bus and truck safety last month with the of- address a carrier’s specific safety problems. erators of commercial vehicles may not Matthew A. Daecher of the Daecher Con- ficial launch of its Compliance Safety Ac- “The CSA program will help us more only make the country’s highways safer but sulting Group. countability system. easily identify unsafe commercial truck and could help alert motorcoach operators im- He said operators can lose business to The centerpiece of CSA is the Safety bus companies,” said U.S. Transportation prove their businesses. competitors who have better statistical data. Measurement System, which analyzes safe- Secretary Ray LaHood. “Better data and tar- Operators who pay close attention to the If they don’t monitor their own information, ty-based violations from inspections and geted enforcement will raise the safety bar expanded carrier data that the safety initia- they will not know which issues are affect- crash data to determine a commercial motor for commercial carriers and empower them tive makes available are likely to benefit, ing their scores and they may miss an oppor- carrier’s on-road performance.
    [Show full text]