Title Identifying and Collecting Primary Sources of Information in The
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
German Prisoners of War and Canadian Internment Operations in Mimico, Ontario, 1940-1944 Kirk W
Document généré le 29 sept. 2021 07:19 Ontario History Number 22 Internment Camp German Prisoners of War and Canadian Internment Operations in Mimico, Ontario, 1940-1944 Kirk W. Goodlet Volume 104, numéro 2, fall 2012 Résumé de l'article Cet article examine les opérations d’internement au Camp M à Mimico, URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1065439ar Ontario, de 1940 à 1944. Basé sur des documents d’archives, il éclaire l’histoire DOI : https://doi.org/10.7202/1065439ar d’un des très rares camps construits près d’une grande ville canadienne pendant la seconde guerre mondiale, un camp qui, encore aujourd’hui, est Aller au sommaire du numéro inconnu de la majorité des Canadiens. Depuis son ouverture, une série de problèmes administratifs, structurels, et personnels ont gêné ses opérations, et ces problèmes, ainsi qu’une très sérieuse déficience d’infrastructure, ont mené Éditeur(s) à la fermeture anticipée du camp en juillet 1944. Aujourd’hui les gouvernements provincial et fédéral sont en train de construire une immense The Ontario Historical Society « superprison » pouvant abriter 1,650 personnes sur le lieu où plus de 500 prisonniers de guerre allemands ont été enfermés jadis. Cet article pourrait ISSN donc contribuer à la discussion sur l’utilité, passée et actuelle, du site. 0030-2953 (imprimé) 2371-4654 (numérique) Découvrir la revue Citer cet article Goodlet, K. W. (2012). Number 22 Internment Camp: German Prisoners of War and Canadian Internment Operations in Mimico, Ontario, 1940-1944. Ontario History, 104(2), 90–115. https://doi.org/10.7202/1065439ar Copyright © The Ontario Historical Society, 2012 Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d’auteur. -
The HARIKARI Club: German Prisoners of War and the Mass Escape Scare of 1944-45 at Internment Camp Grande Ligne, Quebec
Canadian Military History Volume 13 Issue 3 Article 5 2004 The HARIKARI Club: German Prisoners of War and the Mass Escape Scare of 1944-45 at Internment Camp Grande Ligne, Quebec Martin Auger Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Martin Auger "The HARIKARI Club: German Prisoners of War and the Mass Escape Scare of 1944-45 at Internment Camp Grande Ligne, Quebec." Canadian Military History 13, 3 (2004) This Canadian War Museum is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. : The HARIKARI Club: German Prisoners of War and the Mass Escape Scare The HARIKARI Club German Prisoners of War and the Mass Escape Scare of 1944-45 at Internment Camp Grande Ligne, Quebec Martin F. Auger t approximately 0200 hours on and that the objective of the prisoners ASaturday, 5 August 1944, a strange was to overthrow the camp and commit bugle sound resounded in one of the mass suicide.1 compounds of prisoners of war (POW) Camp No.12 in Cowra, Australia. Almost German POWs planned a similar mass immediately, more than 900 Japanese escape in Canada. This little-known prisoners of war rushed from their incident is almost completely ignored living quarters, which they had set on in the historiography. In early October fire, and ran for the barbed wire fences. 1944, Canadian intelligence officers at Most of them were armed with an assortment POW Camp No.44 Grande Ligne, in southern of hand-made weapons, which ranged from Quebec, learned that a secret organization known improvised bats and clubs studded with nails as the HARIKARI Club had been created by some to crude swords fashioned from dismantled of the camp’s more ardent Nazi sympathizers. -
America's Longest Held Prisoner of War: Lessons Learned from the Capture, Prosecution, and Extradition of General Manuel Noriega Geoffrey S
Louisiana Law Review Volume 71 | Number 4 Summer 2011 America's Longest Held Prisoner of War: Lessons Learned from the Capture, Prosecution, and Extradition of General Manuel Noriega Geoffrey S. Corn Sharon G. Finegan Repository Citation Geoffrey S. Corn and Sharon G. Finegan, America's Longest Held Prisoner of War: Lessons Learned from the Capture, Prosecution, and Extradition of General Manuel Noriega, 71 La. L. Rev. (2011) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol71/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. America's Longest Held Prisoner of War: Lessons Learned from the Capture, Prosecution, and Extradition of General Manuel Noriega Geoffrey S. Corn* Sharon G. Finegan" INTRODUCTION In the fall of 1986, while serving his first tour as an Army officer in Panama, one of the authors, Professor Corn, participated in a large-scale field training exercise called Operation Kindle Liberty. For three weeks he worked alongside members of the Panamanian Defense Force (PDF) with the mission of enhancing the capability of the Panamanian military to work side-by-side with the U.S. military to defend the Panama Canal. At the end of their training, as is customary, the commanding generals of both armies came to the field to visit the troops. Then-First Lieutenant Corn stood in an impromptu formation outside of the combined U.S.-PDF tactical operations center as General John Galvin, Commander of United States Southern Command, and his Panamanian counterpart General Manuel Noriega walked down the row of U.S. -
If You Have Issues Viewing Or Accessing This File Contact Us at NCJRS.Gov
If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ---- -------~~----~~~-----------------------., GEORGIA PRISONS A report prepared by the Georgia Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights /-'V \l ~,~ ~ '", " ,< I ; , ,1t ATTRIBllrON: The findings and recommendations contained in this report are those of the Georgia Advisory Committee to the United States Commission on Civil Rights and, as such, are not attributable to the Commission. This report has been prepared by the State Advisory Committee for submission to the Commission, and will be considered by the Commission in formulating its recommenda tions to the President and Congress. RIGHT OF RESPONSE: Prior to the publication of a report, the State Advisory Committee affords to all individuals or organizations that may be defamed, degraded, or incriminated by any material contained in the report an opportunity to respond in writing to such material. All responses have been incorporated, appended, or otherwise reflected in the publication. -.u~ X.i1lJJG&&WMW.. aZ:&iwa5zvL MEMBERSHIP GEORGIA ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO THE UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS Edward E. ElsOlLl, Chairman'>',,>,, Atlanta Mercedes Wright, Vice Chairwoman Savannah Kathleen Wood, Acting Secretary Atlanta Clarence A. Bacote * E. T. Kehrer * Atlanta Atlanta K. Z. Chavis * Carol R. King * Atlanta Albany Charles Clark ** S. Jarvin Levison * Atlanta Atlanta Charles S. Hamilton Arthur J. McClung * Augusta Columbus Joseph M. Hendricks Frances Pauley * Macon Atlanta Jolmnie Hilburn John H. Ruffin, Jr. Augusta Augusta Gary Holmes ** Clayton Sinclair ** Atlanta Atlanta James L. Hooten MOrgan Stanford * Savannah Atlanta Eugene C. Tillman Brunswick * No longer a member of the Committee ** Appointed to the Cummittee after the informal hearing ii -~ -~- ~-~-.~-------------------------; LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL GEORGIA ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO THE U.S. -
The Red Cross and the Holocaust Jean-Claude Favez Index More Information
Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-41587-3 - The Red Cross and the Holocaust Jean-Claude Favez Index More information Index `administrative prisoners' 69 Austrian Red Cross 17 and the effects of the Liberation 252 aerial bombardment, ICRC draft appeals Bachmann, Hans 47, 52, 66, 95, 154, 228, against 85, 87 263, 270 Agency for Miscellaneous Civilian Balfour, Arthur 5 Internees 30±1 Bank of International Settlements 93 aid and assistance (ICRC during World Banyai, Mihaly 236 War II) 91±104 Barbey, FreÂdeÂric 36, 61, 62, 137, 151 to the Jews 71±2, 78, 92, 98, 99±104 Bartov, Omar ix see also Parcels Scheme Bavier, Jean de 110, 234±5, 236, 243, 248 Albrecht, Eric 254 Becher, Kurt 247 Allies, Allied countries Belgian Red Cross 158 aid to populations of occupied Europe 80 and the Liberation 252±3 appeal (17 December 1942) 88 Belgium 155±9 declaration on Jewish massacres (1942) civilian internees 256, 261 66 and the effects of the Liberation 252±3 Altenburg, Ambassador 169 hostages/political prisoners from 156±7 American Jewish Congress 79 ICRC aid and assistance to civilian American Jewish Joint Distribution population 93 Committee 32, 34, 95, 98, 103, 104, ICRC Berlin delegation 27 105, 277 Jews deported from 157±8 and Hungarian Jews 250 Benuzzi, Valerio 225±6 and Polish prisoners 138 Benvenisti, Misu 207 American Polish Relief Committee 142 Berber, Fritz 243, 256, 262, 263, 266 American Red Cross Society 20, 98 Beretta, Dr Bruno 219, 220, 221±3, 224 Amman, Jean d' 167, 170 Bergen-Belsen (concentration camp) 119, Antonescu, Marshal Ion 72, -
Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949
THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS OF 12 AUGUST 1949 AUGUST 12 OF CONVENTIONS THE GENEVA THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS OF 12 AUGUST 1949 0173/002 05.2010 10,000 ICRC Mission The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) is an impartial, neutral and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and other situations of violence and to provide them with assistance. The ICRC also endeavours to prevent suffering by promoting and strengthening humanitarian law and universal humanitarian principles. Established in 1863, the ICRC is at the origin of the Geneva Conventions and the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. It directs and coordinates the international activities conducted by the Movement in armed conflicts and other situations of violence. THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS OF 12 AUGUST 1949 THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS OF 1949 1 Contents Preliminary remarks .......................................................................................................... 19 GENEVA CONVENTION FOR THE AMELIORATION OF THE CONDITION OF THE WOUNDED AND SICK IN ARMED FORCES IN THE FIELD OF 12 AUGUST 1949 CHAPTER I General Provisions ....................................................................................................... 35 Article 1 Respect for the Convention ..................................................................... 35 Article 2 Application of the Convention ................................................................ 35 Article 3 Conflicts not of an international -
Federal Court Prison Litigation Project Revised Handbook
FEDERAL COURT PRISON LITIGATION PROJECT REVISED HANDBOOK April 2002 Prepared With a Grant from the Federal District Court of the Northern District of Illinois by James P.Chapman Eric Dorkin Sarah Geraghty PART I CHAPTER 1: FINDING YOUR CLIENT ...........................................2 SECTION 1: PRISON LOCATOR SERVICES ........................................2 CHAPTER 2: PREPARING YOUR CASE ...........................................3 SECTION 2: ASSESSING THE COMPLAINT. .......................................3 SECTION 3: THE DECISION TO SUE DEFENDANTS IN OFFICIAL/INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY ......4 SECTION 4: REQUESTING STATE PRISON RECORDS ................................5 SECTION 5: WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM .........................6 CHAPTER 3: VISITING YOUR CLIENT .......................................... 7 SECTION 6: PREPARING TO VISIT YOUR CLIENT ..................................7 SECTION 7: VISITING YOUR CLIENT ...........................................9 SECTION 8: TELEPHONE PROCEDURES .........................................11 SECTION 9: HOUSING CLASSIFICATIONS FOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS ............12 CHAPTER 4: INTERVIEWING YOUR CLIENT ....................................14 SECTION 10: CORRECTIONAL FACILITY ENTRANCE PROCEDURES ....................14 SECTION 11: THE CLIENT INTERVIEW .........................................14 SECTION 12: RELATIONSHIP WITH CLIENT DURING THE LITIGATION ..................15 CHAPTER 5: ATTACHMENT OF DAMAGE AWARDS ..............................17 SECTION 13: INTRODUCTION ...............................................17 -
A GERMAN PRISONER of WAR CAMP in a CANADIAN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY DURING WORLD WAR TWO a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty
i CAMP 132: A GERMAN PRISONER OF WAR CAMP IN A CANADIAN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY DURING WORLD WAR TWO A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for a Masters Degree in the Department of History University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon. by Robin Warren Stotz The author claims copyright. Use shall not be made of the material contained herein without proper acknowledgement, as indicated on the following page. I f ii In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the h~ad of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or to make other use of material in this thesis in whole or in part should be addressed to: Head of the Department of History University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N OWO ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii In writing any piece of work one becomes reliant on so many people. -
Introduction
Introduction Captivity is as old as war itself. It has existed Even legitimate POWs have sometimes for centuries and has profoundly affected found their status called into question. The the lives of millions of people, including Allied powers in World War II created other some of the most influential figures in histo- categories to cope with the massive numbers ry. Politicians such as Winston Churchill and of enemy soldiers captured. Some of them Charles de Gaulle, and writers such as were classed as Disarmed Enemy Forces Miguel de Cervantes and P. G. Wodehouse (DEF) or Surrendered Enemy Personnel have all endured imprisonment in wartime. (SEP), artificial distinctions that relieved the It might even be argued that captivity, which Allies of according them all the rights of offi- historically has affected entire populations, cial POWs. By the same token, Italian sol- has been more universal than combat, which diers captured by the Allies were often clas- usually involves only the warriors of any sified not as POWs but as military internees, society. W. Wynne Mason, a historian of another dubious distinction that owed more New Zealand POWs, has estimated that one to the demands of the moment than any- person in every thousand was interned at thing else. Finally, war captivity has also some point during World War II. Even involved civilians who have been interned in that global conflict, armed combat for a variety of reasons. While they are not occurred in only a few regions. Internment, prisoners of war in the strictest sense, they on the other hand, occurred in all nations, have certainly been prisoners in wartime. -
Georgia State Advisory Committee to the DS Commission on Civil Rights, Washington, DC *Corrective Irstitutions
DOCUMEMT BIZASHE 178 671 OB OIS 960 TITLE Georgia Prisons. INSTITUTION Georgia State Advisory Committee to the D.S. Commission on Civil Rights. SPONS AGENCY Commission on Civil Rights, Washington, D.C. PUB DATE Feb 76 NOTE 7Bp. FDRS PRICE MF01/pC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Corrective Irstitutions; Educational Opportunities; Employment Opportunities; Employment Practices; *Facility Requirements; Institutional Facilities; *Minority Groups; *Prisoners; *Racial Discrimination; *Rehabilitation Programs IDENTIFIERS *Georgia 0 ABSTRACT Findings from a study of Georgia's 16 adult penal institutions indicate that the State's prigon system is plagued by many problems. For example, inadequate funds are allocated to maintain facilities and services for its prisoners. As a result, many of the prisons are aktiquated, overcrowded and understaffed. In addition, minorities are not hired proportionate to tkeir numbers in the State's population. Discriminatoi:y racial patterns are also found with regard to minority prisoners in prison work assignments, educational and vocational opportunities, and in the overall treatment of inmates. In order to rectify some of these problems, it is suggested that the State legislature and the Board of Corrections take action to recruit more black employees' provide more opportunities for inmates to learn marketable skills, and to expand academic training for prisoners. (Author/EB) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can De made from the original document. *********************************************************************** GEORGIA PRISONS A report prepared by the Georgia Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights February 1976 ATTRIBUTION: The findings and recommendations contained in this report are those of the Georgia Advisory Committee to the United States Commission on Civil Rights and, as such, are not attributable to theCommission. -
Captured: the Internment of American Civilians in the Philippines, 1941-1945'
H-US-Japan Kolb on Cogan, 'Captured: The Internment of American Civilians in the Philippines, 1941-1945' Review published on Sunday, July 1, 2001 Frances B. Cogan. Captured: The Internment of American Civilians in the Philippines, 1941-1945. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2000. xi + 357 pp. $39.95 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-8203-2117-2. Reviewed by Charles C. Kolb (National Endowment for the Humanities) Published on H-US-Japan (July, 2001) American Civilian POWs in the Philippines during World War Two [Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein are those of the reviewer and not of his employer or any other federal agency.] American Civilian POWs in the Philippines during World War Two At the beginning of hostilities in the Pacific Theater during World War II, the Japanese Army initially captured more than 140,000 Allied military prisoners--British, Australians, New Zealanders, Dutch, and Americans. The story of the treatment of POWs at the hands of the Japanese has been told in many accounts, for example by Gavan Daws in Prisoners of the Japanese.[1] More recently, Theresa Kaminski, associate professor history at the University of Wisconsin at Stevens Point, has examined accounts of women from all backgrounds--missionaries, teachers, civilians, and military nurses-- interned during World War II as well as those who chose to stay out of the camps and go underground, often to join guerilla forces fighting the Japanese. Kaminski's very valuable account of shifting gender roles during wartime is presented in her bookPrisoners in Paradise: American Women in the Wartime South Pacific.[2] The volume herein reviewed documents a lesser known but nonetheless compelling story of American civilians who were captured and imprisoned by the Japanese in the Philippines. -
Predicting Major Prison Incidents
PREDICTINQ MAJOR PRISON Criminology Research Council Grant 12/87 SUMMARY OF REPORT This report reviews the nature and causes of major prison incidents, and also investigates the extent to which their occurrence can be predicted by monitoring indicators of the prison environment, especially minor incidents and disciplinary reports. Major prison incidents, such as fires, riots, mass escapes and hostage-taking, are important features of custodial systems. They can cause enormous material damage and extensive human suffering in a short space of time. Planning for their prevention and control is a significant pre-occupation amongst corrections administrators, and the management of a major incident may be the most rigorous test prison managers are likely to face. Major prison incidents have a number of features that distinguish them from other forms of violent or disruptive behaviour that occur in prisons. They are: collective events, involving large groups of prisoners; of relatively short duration; involve a loss of control over part or all of the facility; often have significant political or administrative consequences. Explaining the causes of major prison incidents A variety of theoretical models have been proposed to explain major incidents. One way to characterise theoretical models is as "internal" or "external" models. Internal models emphasise the characteristics or conditions of prisons that give rise to violence. On the other hand, external models give precedence to the characteristics that prisoners bring into the system that make them prone to violence. Integrated theories that combine these two approaches have also been proposed. Other theoretical approaches consider the breakdown of normal social structures that occurs in prisons, including disorganization in prison administration, that makes violent upheaval more likely.