mona lisa to marge to marge How the World’s Greatest Artworks Entered Popular Culture

Francesca Bonazzoli Michele Robecchi

Preface by Maurizio Cattelan

Prestel Munich · London · New York mona lisa to marge How the World’s Greatest Artworks Entered Popular Culture

Francesca Bonazzoli Michele Robecchi

Preface by Maurizio Cattelan

Prestel Munich · London · New York contents

6 Image to Power 46 Mona Lisa (ca. 1503–6) 82 luncheon 118 The Persistence Preface by Maurizio Cattelan Leonardo Da Vinci on the grass (1863) of Memory (1931) Édouard Manet Salvador Dalí 8 How to Become an Icon 50 David (ca. 1504) Introduction by Francesca Bonazzoli Michelangelo Buonarroti 86 the thinker (1880–81) 122 Guernica (1937) Auguste Rodin Pablo Picasso 54 Creation of Adam (ca. 1511) Michelangelo Buonarroti 90 Sunflowers (1888–89) 126 white and red / Vincent van Gogh Composition with red, 58 Sistine Madonna (1512–13) Blue, and yellow (1937–42) Raphael 94 The Scream (1893) Piet Mondrian Edvard Munch 22 Discobolus (ca. 480–440 bc) 62 Las Meninas (1656) 130 Nighthawks (1942) Myron Diego Velázquez 98 Jane Avril Edward Hopper jardin de (ca. 1893) 26 Nike of Samothrace (ca. 295–287 bc) 66 Girl with Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec 134 gold marilyn monroe (1962) Anonymous a Pearl EarrinG (ca. 1665) Andy Warhol Johannes Vermeer 102 Water Lily pond, 30 de Milo (ca. 200 bc) green harmony (1899) 138 Son of Man (1964) Anonymous 70 Naked MaJa (1797–1800) Claude Monet René Magritte clothed MaJa (1807–08) 34 Laocoön and His Sons (ca. 42–20 bc) Francisco de Goya 106 The Kiss (1907–08) Agesandros, Athanadoros and Polydoros Gustav Klimt 74 Liberty Leading 38 Birth of Venus (ca. 1484) the People (1830) 110 dance (1909–10) Sandro Botticelli Eugène Delacroix Henri Matisse 142 Essential Reading

42 Last Supper (ca. 1494–98) 78 The Great Wave (ca. 1830–32) 114 American Gothic (1930) 144 Credits Leonardo Da Vinci Katsushika Hokusai Grant Wood contents

6 Image to Power 46 Mona Lisa (ca. 1503–6) 82 luncheon 118 The Persistence Preface by Maurizio Cattelan Leonardo Da Vinci on the grass (1863) of Memory (1931) Édouard Manet Salvador Dalí 8 How to Become an Icon 50 David (ca. 1504) Introduction by Francesca Bonazzoli Michelangelo Buonarroti 86 the thinker (1880–81) 122 Guernica (1937) Auguste Rodin Pablo Picasso 54 Creation of Adam (ca. 1511) Michelangelo Buonarroti 90 Sunflowers (1888–89) 126 white and red / Vincent van Gogh Composition with red, 58 Sistine Madonna (1512–13) Blue, and yellow (1937–42) Raphael 94 The Scream (1893) Piet Mondrian Edvard Munch 22 Discobolus (ca. 480–440 bc) 62 Las Meninas (1656) 130 Nighthawks (1942) Myron Diego Velázquez 98 Jane Avril Edward Hopper jardin de paris (ca. 1893) 26 Nike of Samothrace (ca. 295–287 bc) 66 Girl with Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec 134 gold marilyn monroe (1962) Anonymous a Pearl EarrinG (ca. 1665) Andy Warhol Johannes Vermeer 102 Water Lily pond, 30 venus de Milo (ca. 200 bc) green harmony (1899) 138 Son of Man (1964) Anonymous 70 Naked MaJa (1797–1800) Claude Monet René Magritte clothed MaJa (1807–08) 34 Laocoön and His Sons (ca. 42–20 bc) Francisco de Goya 106 The Kiss (1907–08) Agesandros, Athanadoros and Polydoros Gustav Klimt 74 Liberty Leading 38 Birth of Venus (ca. 1484) the People (1830) 110 dance (1909–10) Sandro Botticelli Eugène Delacroix Henri Matisse 142 Essential Reading

42 Last Supper (ca. 1494–98) 78 The Great Wave (ca. 1830–32) 114 American Gothic (1930) 144 Credits Leonardo Da Vinci Katsushika Hokusai Grant Wood 6 — 7 image

I have a confession to make: I would like to write this pref- and repeating it in a different context. It’s a question ace using images; words are not for me. To give meaning of language, a journey in which ongoing exchanges of to what I have in my head, using a string of words, one af- information enrich every stage. Just as ideas are in con- ter another, never satisfies me. What is always missing is tinual circulation, images can be as well—they belong to power the Word that sums up everything. Images, on the other simultaneously to everyone and to no one. It’s good to hand, are concise—they can be simultaneously comic and consider, as this book does, the innumerable lives of these tragic, for example. Everything there is to know is there; artworks. Let us not forget that people stopped liking one glance is enough to understand. Monet’s Water Lilies precisely when they were given a Preface by It’s funny, because a few decades ago they said the museum all to themselves; that Botticelli’s Birth of Venus future would be synesthetic—the supremacy of the eye had to wait for supermodel Claudia Schiffer in order to would be over. Things didn’t exactly turn out that way. become truly popular; and that even Leonardo’s Mona Maurizio Cattelan We spend most of our time looking at a screen and con- Lisa inspired crowds to line up in front of the vince ourselves that we know the world through it. Im- only after it was stolen in 1911. Each had the occasion to ages have a persuasive power that exceeds any word. become an icon, and each, in turn, has been transformed Whoever wants to hold sway over the masses has always from icon into myth. And if myths emerge in order to produced and controlled images: once it was popes and explain a society’s culture and customs, I can think of kings, today it’s advertising agencies. We can’t stop look- nothing more representative of our time than Michelan- ing at images; they appeal to us irresistibly. We end up gelo’s Creation of Adam, materializing on-screen every obsessed with them. Trying to determine why risks strip- time someone turns on a Nokia cell phone. ping them of their magic, diminishing their fascination, destroying their myth. It is a bit like vivisection: interest- ing, even fundamental, discoveries can be made, but the patient tends to expire during the operation. Personally, I don’t believe in the sacredness of images. Perhaps not all of the artists in this book would be proud to see their work reproduced on mugs and slippers, but this is basically how they achieved immortality. Mass society has adopted these masterpieces and transformed them into advertising campaigns and merchandise. This is how they have become familiar, a public and everyday legacy. It’s like taking a phrase overheard in conversation 6 — 7 image

I have a confession to make: I would like to write this pref- and repeating it in a different context. It’s a question ace using images; words are not for me. To give meaning of language, a journey in which ongoing exchanges of to what I have in my head, using a string of words, one af- information enrich every stage. Just as ideas are in con- ter another, never satisfies me. What is always missing is tinual circulation, images can be as well—they belong to power the Word that sums up everything. Images, on the other simultaneously to everyone and to no one. It’s good to hand, are concise—they can be simultaneously comic and consider, as this book does, the innumerable lives of these tragic, for example. Everything there is to know is there; artworks. Let us not forget that people stopped liking one glance is enough to understand. Monet’s Water Lilies precisely when they were given a Preface by It’s funny, because a few decades ago they said the museum all to themselves; that Botticelli’s Birth of Venus future would be synesthetic—the supremacy of the eye had to wait for supermodel Claudia Schiffer in order to would be over. Things didn’t exactly turn out that way. become truly popular; and that even Leonardo’s Mona Maurizio Cattelan We spend most of our time looking at a screen and con- Lisa inspired crowds to line up in front of the Louvre vince ourselves that we know the world through it. Im- only after it was stolen in 1911. Each had the occasion to ages have a persuasive power that exceeds any word. become an icon, and each, in turn, has been transformed Whoever wants to hold sway over the masses has always from icon into myth. And if myths emerge in order to produced and controlled images: once it was popes and explain a society’s culture and customs, I can think of kings, today it’s advertising agencies. We can’t stop look- nothing more representative of our time than Michelan- ing at images; they appeal to us irresistibly. We end up gelo’s Creation of Adam, materializing on-screen every obsessed with them. Trying to determine why risks strip- time someone turns on a Nokia cell phone. ping them of their magic, diminishing their fascination, destroying their myth. It is a bit like vivisection: interest- ing, even fundamental, discoveries can be made, but the patient tends to expire during the operation. Personally, I don’t believe in the sacredness of images. Perhaps not all of the artists in this book would be proud to see their work reproduced on mugs and slippers, but this is basically how they achieved immortality. Mass society has adopted these masterpieces and transformed them into advertising campaigns and merchandise. This is how they have become familiar, a public and everyday legacy. It’s like taking a phrase overheard in conversation 8 — 9

But if we had to name anything which is the life of the sign, we should have to say that it was how its use.

Ludwig Wittgenstein to become The Blue Book

How, who, and what has the power to transform a work traced the origin of the veneration of Christian images of art into a secular icon, an image that is universally rec- to the worship of relics. Beginning in the sixth century, an icon ognized and even worshipped as an object of pilgrim- priests began consecrating relics and investing them with age and long lines at museums? Why, of all of Auguste divinity through the words of a ritual formula or the Rodin’s , is it The Thinker that has become the sprinkling of holy water or incense. But the image as a most famous? How is it that two works by Leonardo da simulacrum of divinity, endowed with autonomous pow- Introduction by Vinci, the Last Supper and Mona Lisa, are among the er, was a concept that was also present among the ancient most popular in the world, yet most people who know Greeks. Aristophanes relates how sculptures by Daeda- Francesca Bonazzoli Caravaggio’s name would find it difficult to name just lus—the first artist to depict figures with open eyes, one of his paintings or call them up accurately from separated legs, and arms distinct from the body—were memory? And why did Sandro Botticelli’s Birth of Venus, bound to keep them from running away. The of after being ignored for centuries, unexpectedly become Artemis Orthia, in Sparta, known as Lygodesma (“bound a star? with willow”), was considered extremely dangerous; Pau- To put it simply, one might say that there are four fac- sanias describes how the two men who found it were tors that are fundamental for a work of art to become fa- struck by madness after merely looking the goddess in mous: what is said, who says it, how it is said, and where the eye, leading to the belief that she needed to be con- it is said. strained and bound. Similarly, when Emperor Constan- Yet the answers to these four questions can’t tell the tine built his new city on the Bosporus, he commanded full story, for the “mystery of icons,” which is anything that the statue of Fortune be kept under lock and key but schematic and unambiguous, involves history, soci- so she would not abandon Constantinople. In the Bible, ology, and psychology as well as religion. too, everything begins with a statue of man molded from We might begin with the studies of André Grabar, who earth and brought to life by the breath of God. 8 — 9

But if we had to name anything which is the life of the sign, we should have to say that it was how its use.

Ludwig Wittgenstein to become The Blue Book

How, who, and what has the power to transform a work traced the origin of the veneration of Christian images of art into a secular icon, an image that is universally rec- to the worship of relics. Beginning in the sixth century, an icon ognized and even worshipped as an object of pilgrim- priests began consecrating relics and investing them with age and long lines at museums? Why, of all of Auguste divinity through the words of a ritual formula or the Rodin’s sculptures, is it The Thinker that has become the sprinkling of holy water or incense. But the image as a most famous? How is it that two works by Leonardo da simulacrum of divinity, endowed with autonomous pow- Introduction by Vinci, the Last Supper and Mona Lisa, are among the er, was a concept that was also present among the ancient most popular in the world, yet most people who know Greeks. Aristophanes relates how sculptures by Daeda- Francesca Bonazzoli Caravaggio’s name would find it difficult to name just lus—the first artist to depict figures with open eyes, one of his paintings or call them up accurately from separated legs, and arms distinct from the body—were memory? And why did Sandro Botticelli’s Birth of Venus, bound to keep them from running away. The statue of after being ignored for centuries, unexpectedly become Artemis Orthia, in Sparta, known as Lygodesma (“bound a star? with willow”), was considered extremely dangerous; Pau- To put it simply, one might say that there are four fac- sanias describes how the two men who found it were tors that are fundamental for a work of art to become fa- struck by madness after merely looking the goddess in mous: what is said, who says it, how it is said, and where the eye, leading to the belief that she needed to be con- it is said. strained and bound. Similarly, when Emperor Constan- Yet the answers to these four questions can’t tell the tine built his new city on the Bosporus, he commanded full story, for the “mystery of icons,” which is anything that the statue of Fortune be kept under lock and key but schematic and unambiguous, involves history, soci- so she would not abandon Constantinople. In the Bible, ology, and psychology as well as religion. too, everything begins with a statue of man molded from We might begin with the studies of André Grabar, who earth and brought to life by the breath of God. mona lisa to marge 10 — 11 how to become an icon

In The Power of Images, art historian David Freedberg a modern peculiarity. For centuries the Vatican’s Belve- explains that the phenomenon of consecration demon- dere Courtyard has conferred a stamp of nobility on the strates how all images potentially function before being ancient displayed there, including the Apollo sanctified. There is an extremely vast repertory from Belvedere. Among the thousands of that were ex- which the priest and the faithful can extrapolate an im- cavated during the Renaissance, especially in , only age to be the object of worship. Once the image is select- some ascended to a special rank, and these were pre- ed, a temple or sanctuary is always constructed around cisely the ones that were privileged with an authorita- it, which not only protects it from inclement weather but tive site—not just the Belvedere, but also the Tribuna of can also become a destination of pilgrimage. the Uffizi in Florence, the royal palace of Fontainebleau, And yet in our contemporary “religion of consump- or, later, the Musée Napoléon in Paris. Works located tion,” as George Ritzer has called it, museums are the in such places became the canon of international taste; temples of art history’s icons. People arrive at their doors copies of them could be found at the palace of Versailles from all over the world and wait in line to adore Leon- or the Hermitage in Saint Petersburg, in the gardens ardo’s Mona Lisa or Vincent van Gogh’s Sunflowers. of English aristocrats, and, at a reduced scale, on tab- Which brings us to another condition that is requi- letops in upper-middle-class homes. As their fame was site for the consecration of an artwork as an icon: the propagated from exclusive temples of taste, they came to place where it is kept. Museums, wrote André Malraux, constitute a shared visual panorama throughout Europe. not only display masterpieces, they also create them. He As Montesquieu wrote in Voyage d’Italie (1728), “There wondered if the Mona Lisa would enjoy the level of fame exist certain statues that connoisseurs have determined it does today if it were in a museum in Birmingham. to be a norm and example, each in its own way: . . . the Probably she would, for—as we will see in the section Apollo Belvedere, the Farnese Hercules, the Laocoön. devoted to her in this book—what launched the paint- And one will never observe these statues sufficiently, for ing to worldwide fame was the uproar over its theft in it is based upon them that the moderns have built their 1911 (it had hitherto been known only to the most cul- system of proportions, and it is they that have virtually tured of audiences, mostly for its prestigious backstory given us the arts.” of swapping from one royal collection to another). Yet Beyond the site of exhibition, there is another detail it is certainly the strategic position of the Nike of Samo- that is decisive in the transformation of a work of art into Cleomenes thrace on the Musée du Louvre’s staircase that has been an icon: the identity of its author and the mythography Medici Venus, first century bc Greek marble, height 153 cm fundamental for the fame of this classical sculpture. If associated with that individual. The crucial nature of this Galleria degli Uffizi, Florence the statue had been in Birmingham, to borrow Malraux’s name can be confirmed in any museum when one see paradox, it would likely not have become the pop icon it visitors reading the label beside a painting—watch one Detail of Sandro Botticelli’s Birth of Venus, ca. 1484 is today, so famous that it is quoted subliminally in both stop suddenly upon noticing, for example, that the work the crucial scene and the poster for the blockbuster film is by Caravaggio, an artist who has gained a place of pri- Titanic—Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet on the mary importance in the modern collective imagination prow of the ocean liner, leaning into the wind in trium- due to his rebellious and profligate life. phant celebration of their love, arms open like wings. Likewise, if new research leads experts to downgrade And yet the importance of where a work is seen is not certain celebrated artworks, such as The Giant or Man mona lisa to marge 10 — 11 how to become an icon

In The Power of Images, art historian David Freedberg a modern peculiarity. For centuries the Vatican’s Belve- explains that the phenomenon of consecration demon- dere Courtyard has conferred a stamp of nobility on the strates how all images potentially function before being ancient sculpture displayed there, including the Apollo sanctified. There is an extremely vast repertory from Belvedere. Among the thousands of statues that were ex- which the priest and the faithful can extrapolate an im- cavated during the Renaissance, especially in Italy, only age to be the object of worship. Once the image is select- some ascended to a special rank, and these were pre- ed, a temple or sanctuary is always constructed around cisely the ones that were privileged with an authorita- it, which not only protects it from inclement weather but tive site—not just the Belvedere, but also the Tribuna of can also become a destination of pilgrimage. the Uffizi in Florence, the royal palace of Fontainebleau, And yet in our contemporary “religion of consump- or, later, the Musée Napoléon in Paris. Works located tion,” as George Ritzer has called it, museums are the in such places became the canon of international taste; temples of art history’s icons. People arrive at their doors copies of them could be found at the palace of Versailles from all over the world and wait in line to adore Leon- or the Hermitage in Saint Petersburg, in the gardens ardo’s Mona Lisa or Vincent van Gogh’s Sunflowers. of English aristocrats, and, at a reduced scale, on tab- Which brings us to another condition that is requi- letops in upper-middle-class homes. As their fame was site for the consecration of an artwork as an icon: the propagated from exclusive temples of taste, they came to place where it is kept. Museums, wrote André Malraux, constitute a shared visual panorama throughout Europe. not only display masterpieces, they also create them. He As Montesquieu wrote in Voyage d’Italie (1728), “There wondered if the Mona Lisa would enjoy the level of fame exist certain statues that connoisseurs have determined it does today if it were in a museum in Birmingham. to be a norm and example, each in its own way: . . . the Probably she would, for—as we will see in the section Apollo Belvedere, the Farnese Hercules, the Laocoön. devoted to her in this book—what launched the paint- And one will never observe these statues sufficiently, for ing to worldwide fame was the uproar over its theft in it is based upon them that the moderns have built their 1911 (it had hitherto been known only to the most cul- system of proportions, and it is they that have virtually tured of audiences, mostly for its prestigious backstory given us the arts.” of swapping from one royal collection to another). Yet Beyond the site of exhibition, there is another detail it is certainly the strategic position of the Nike of Samo- that is decisive in the transformation of a work of art into Cleomenes thrace on the Musée du Louvre’s staircase that has been an icon: the identity of its author and the mythography Medici Venus, first century bc Greek marble, height 153 cm fundamental for the fame of this classical sculpture. If associated with that individual. The crucial nature of this Galleria degli Uffizi, Florence the statue had been in Birmingham, to borrow Malraux’s name can be confirmed in any museum when one see paradox, it would likely not have become the pop icon it visitors reading the label beside a painting—watch one Detail of Sandro Botticelli’s Birth of Venus, ca. 1484 is today, so famous that it is quoted subliminally in both stop suddenly upon noticing, for example, that the work the crucial scene and the poster for the blockbuster film is by Caravaggio, an artist who has gained a place of pri- Titanic—Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet on the mary importance in the modern collective imagination prow of the ocean liner, leaning into the wind in trium- due to his rebellious and profligate life. phant celebration of their love, arms open like wings. Likewise, if new research leads experts to downgrade And yet the importance of where a work is seen is not certain celebrated artworks, such as The Giant or Man