DOCSLIB.ORG

Differential Lineage Restriction of Rat Retinal Progenitor Cells in Vitro And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Differential Lineage Restriction of Rat Retinal Progenitor Cells in Vitro And JournalofNeuroscienceResearch69:466–476(2002) DifferentialLineageRestrictionofRat RetinalProgenitorCellsinVitroandinVivo PengYang,1 MagdaleneJ.Seiler,1,2* RobertB.Aramant,1,2 and ScottR.Whittemore2–4 1DepartmentofOphthalmologyandVisualSciences,UniversityofLouisville,Louisville,Kentucky 2DepartmentofAnatomicalSciencesandNeurobiology,UniversityofLouisville,Louisville,Kentucky 3DepartmentofNeurologicalSurgery,UniversityofLouisville,Louisville,Kentucky 4KentuckySpinalCordInjuryResearchCenter,UniversityofLouisville,Louisville,Kentucky Toidentifyandcharacterizethelineagepotentialofrat horizontal,bipolar,amacrine,andganglioncells;andMu¨l- neuralretinaprogenitorcells(NRPCs)invitroanden- lerglialcellsandastrocytes.Retinalneuronaldifferentia- graftedintoratswithretinaldegeneration,NRPCswere tionoccursinlateembryonicdevelopmentandearly isolatedfromneuralretinasofembryonicday17Long postnatallifeintherat(Cepkoetal.,1996).Similarlyto Evansratsandculturedinserum-freeorserum- neuronsinotherCNSandPNSlocations,retinalneurons containingmediawithfibroblastgrowthfactor2and retainnointrinsiccapabilityofself-regenerationinre- neurotrophin3.Afterexpansion,cellulardifferentiation sponsetoinheritedoracquireddamage.Therefore,ex- wasinitiatedbythewithdrawalofthesegrowthfactors. trinsiccellsandtissueswithvaryingdegreesofdifferenti- Despiteformingprimaryneurospheres,NRPCscultured ation,suchasretinalpieces(TurnerandBlair,1986), inserum-freemediumsurvivedpoorlyafterpassage.In photoreceptorcells(SilvermanandHughes,1989;Kaplan contrast,NRPCsculturedinserum-containingmedium etal.,1997),andtissuesheets(SeilerandAramant,1998; couldbeexpandedforupto12passagesanddifferen- tiatedintoglialfibrillaryacidicprotein-positiveglialcells Aramantetal.,1999;Wochetal.,2001),introduced andretina-specificneuronsexpressingrhodopsin, throughsurgicaltransplantationarethenecessarysources S-antigen,calbindin,recoverin,andcalretinin.Forinvivo forreplacingdamagedretinalneurons. analysis,passage1(P1)undifferentiatedNRPCswere Anotherapproachtoreplacingdegeneratedneurons labeledwithbromodeoxyuridine(BrdU),implantedinto istouseneuralstemandprogenitorcells,whichare thesubretinalspaceofRoyalCollegeofSurgeons(RCS) intrinsictothehippocampus(AltmanandDas,1965; rats,andanalyzedimmunohistochemically4weeks KaplanandHinds,1977;Bayeretal.,1982;Kuhnetal., postgrafting.ThegraftedNRPCsshowedextensiveglial 1996),subventricularzone(Lewis,1968;Reynoldsand differentiation,irrespectiveoftheirtopographiclocaliza- Weiss,1992;LoisandAlvarez-Buylla,1993;Morsheadet tion.AfewBrdU-labeledgraftedNRPCsexpressedpro- al.,1994),spinalcord(Weissetal.,1996;Kalyanietal., teinkinaseC,amarkerforbipolarandamacrine 1997),retinalpigmentedciliarymargin(Ahmadetal., interneuron-specificdifferentiation.Otherretina-specific 2000;Tropepeetal.,2000),andneuralretina(Ahmadet oroligodendrocyticdifferentiationwasnotdetectedin al.,1999)oftheCNS.CNSneuralstemandprogenitor thegraftedcells.AlthoughNRPCsarecapableofself- cellsareundifferentiated,expressingtheneuralprecursor renewalandmultilineagedifferentiationinvitro,theyde- intermediatefilamentnestin(HockfieldandMcKay,1985; velopedmostlyintoglialcellsfollowingengraftmentinto CattaneoandMcKay,1990).Afterdifferentiationinvitro theadultretina.Thesedatasuggestthattheadultretina orinvivo,neuralstemandprogenitorcellscandevelop retainsepigeneticsignalsthatareeitherrestrictivefor alongneuronal,astrocytic,andoligodendrocyticpathways neuronaldifferentiationorinstructiveforglialdifferentia- (WhittemoreandSnyder,1996;McKay,1997;Gage, tion.Inductionoflineage-specificcelldifferentiationof 2000).Moreover,stemcellscantransdifferentiatewhen engraftedNRPCstofacilitateretinalrepairwilllikelyre- graftedtoectopicsites(Bjornsonetal.,1999;Clarkeetal., quireinitiationofspecificdifferentiationinvitropriorto 2000). graftingand/ormodificationofthehostenvironmentcon- comitantlywithNRPCgrafting.©2002Wiley-Liss,Inc. *Correspondenceto:MagdaleneJ.Seiler,PhD,DepartmentofOphthal- Keywords:retinalprogenitorcell;photoreceptor;bipo- mologyandVisualSciences,UniversityofLouisvilleSchoolofMedicine, larcell;transplantation 301EastMuhammadAliBoulevard,Louisville,KY40202. E-mail:[email protected] Received9January2002;Revised30April2002;Accepted7May2002 Themammalianneuralretinaiscomposedofsix Publishedonline27June2002inWileyInterScience(www. classesofdistinctneurons:coneandrodphotoreceptors; interscience.wiley.com).DOI:10.1002/jnr.10320 ©2002Wiley-Liss,Inc. Retinal Progenitor Cell Differentiation In Vitro and In Vivo 467 Differentiation of in vitro expanded neural stem and and efficiency with which the sphere-forming cells retained the progenitor cells into cells expressing retinal cell pheno- ability to form secondary (P1) spheres, the numbers of P0 and P1 types either has not been investigated or has been found spheres at day 6 after plating were counted. only in cells isolated from the eye (Ahmad et al., 1999; For the adherent cultures, the media included 1% fetal Tropepe et al., 2000; Yang et al., 2002), suggesting that bovine serum (FBS; Invitrogen) in addition to the components there are intrinsic and/or extrinsic limitations affecting in the serum-free medium. In pilot studies (data not shown), retinal cell differential fate. The present data show that rat many different variations of serum-free medium were tried. neural retina progenitor cells (NRPCs) develop into ret- However, the cells did not grow well and could not be passaged. inal neurons in vitro, expressing the retinal cell-specific Therefore, 1% FBS was included in all experiments described in antigens rhodopsin and S-antigen, whereas the undiffer- this paper. In addition, FGF-2 was tested in combination with entiated NRPCs transplanted into the subretinal space of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF; 10 ng/ml; Caldwell et rats with retinal degeneration did not show corresponding al., 2001). No difference in cell proliferation and cell phenotypes differentiation. Engrafted NRPCs adopted mostly a glial after differentiation was observed (data not shown). Therefore, fate and occasionally a bipolar/amacrine cell phenotype. PDGF was not included in the experiments in this study. Half the culture medium was changed every 2 days and FGF-2 added MATERIALS AND METHODS every other day. Cells grew to 70–80% confluence in 7–14 days NRPC Isolation and were harvested with a cell lifter (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ). P1 and later passages of cells were plated at the same ϭ Embryonic day (E) 17 fetuses (n 17) were harvested density as the P0 cells in the PO/FN-coated dishes. from timed-pregnant, outbred Long Evans rats (Harlan Sprague For immunocytochemical identification of dividing cells Dawley, Indianapolis, IN). All animals were treated according to from proliferating cultures, 10 ␮M bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU; the Guidelines for the Use of Animals in Neuroscience Research and Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was added either overnight or 5 days the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of immediately before the day when induction of differentiation Laboratory Animals, with the approval of the University of Lou- began or termination of the cultures. The cells used for trans- isville Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The fetal plantation were expanded in expansion cultures and pulsed with eyes were collected in Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS; 10 ␮M BrdU for 5 days immediately before the day of trans- Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and transferred to fresh HBSS in a plantation. Before each transplantation experiment, the percent- 35-mm petri dish on ice. Neural retinas were separated free of ages of nestin-positive (undifferentiated) and GFAP-positive vitreous, lens, retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE), and cornea. (differentiated) immunophenotypes of the cells to be used were Special care was taken to exclude the optic disk and the ciliary examined to ensure that the cells were mostly undifferentiated. margin by cutting off a circular 1.5-mm zone from the center of the optic nerve and the margin of the ciliary bodies. Neural In Vitro Differentiation retinas were digested in 0.05% trypsin (Invitrogen) in artificial Expanded cells were harvested and replated on PO/FN- cerebral spinal fluid [ACSF; 124 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, coated 12-well dishes (Costar Corning Inc, Corning, NY) at a 5 2 1.3 mM MgCl2, 2 mM CaCl2, 26 mM NaHCO3, and 10 mM density of 10 cells/cm . Cells were induced to differentiate by D-glucose, pH 7.35, aerated with 95% O2/5% CO2 (Reynolds replacing the FGF-2 and NT3 with 10% FBS for 5–21 days, and Weiss, 1992)] for 10 min at room temperature and triturated with one or two medium changes. No attempt was made to gently with a fire-polished, siliconized Pasteur glass pipette to differentiate the cells under serum-free conditions. To test the release single cells. The cell suspension was centrifuged at 150g effect of Matrigel on the cells, cells were grown on Matrigel- for 5 min, and the resulting pellets were resuspended in fresh coated dishes (growth factor-reduced and laminin- and collagen culture medium. Cell viability was evaluated with trypan blue, IV-based Matrigel matrix; 1:20; Becton Dickinson Labware, and the cell concentration was adjusted for plating. Bedford, MA). After differentiation, no difference in phenotypes was observed in P1 and P2 cells (data not shown). Expansion and Passage Isolated cells were cultured at 5 ϫ 104 cells/cm2 under Transplantation two conditions: as a cell suspension in uncoated flasks (Ahmad et Five inbred albino Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) rats al., 1999) or as a monolayer on dishes precoated with 10 ␮g/ml
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Rhodopsin Gene Expressed in Photoreceptor Cell R7 of the Drosophila Eye: Homologies with Other Signal-Transducing Molecules
    The Journal of Neuroscience, May 1987, 7(5): 1550-I 557 A Rhodopsin Gene Expressed in Photoreceptor Cell R7 of the Drosophila Eye: Homologies with Other Signal-Transducing Molecules Charles S. Zuker, Craig Montell, Kevin Jones, Todd Laverty, and Gerald M. Rubin Department of Biochemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 We have isolated an opsin gene from D. melanogaster that example, Pak, 1979; Hardie, 1983; Rubin, 1985). The com- is expressed in the ultraviolet-sensitive photoreceptor cell pound eye of Drosophila contains 3 distinct classesof photo- R7 of the Drosophila compound eye. This opsin gene con- receptor cells, Rl-6, R7, and R8, distinguishableby their mor- tains no introns and encodes a 383 amino acid polypeptide phological arrangement and the spectral behavior of their that is approximately 35% homologous to the blue absorbing corresponding visual pigments (reviewed by Hardie, 1983). In ninaE and Rh2 opsins, which are expressed in photoreceptor each of the approximately 800 ommatidia that make up the eye cells RI-6 and R8, respectively. Amino acid homologies be- there are 6 outer (Rl-R6) and 2 central (1 R7 and 1 R8) pho- tween these different opsins and other signal-transducing toreceptor cells (Fig. 1). The photopigments found in the Rl- molecules suggest an important role for the conserved do- R6 cells, the R7 cell, and the R8 cell differ in their absorption mains of rhodopsin in the transduction of extracellular sig- spectra (Harris et al., 1976) most likely becausedifferent opsin nals. genesare expressedin these distinct classesof photoreceptor cells. The 6 peripheral cells (RI-6) contain the major visual Phototransduction, the neuronal excitation processtriggered by pigment, a rhodopsin that absorbsmaximally at 480 nm (Ostroy light, provides an ideal model system for the study of sensory et al., 1974).
    [Show full text]
  • Chemoreception
    Senses 5 SENSES live version • discussion • edit lesson • comment • report an error enses are the physiological methods of perception. The senses and their operation, classification, Sand theory are overlapping topics studied by a variety of fields. Sense is a faculty by which outside stimuli are perceived. We experience reality through our senses. A sense is a faculty by which outside stimuli are perceived. Many neurologists disagree about how many senses there actually are due to a broad interpretation of the definition of a sense. Our senses are split into two different groups. Our Exteroceptors detect stimulation from the outsides of our body. For example smell,taste,and equilibrium. The Interoceptors receive stimulation from the inside of our bodies. For instance, blood pressure dropping, changes in the gluclose and Ph levels. Children are generally taught that there are five senses (sight, hearing, touch, smell, taste). However, it is generally agreed that there are at least seven different senses in humans, and a minimum of two more observed in other organisms. Sense can also differ from one person to the next. Take taste for an example, what may taste great to me will taste awful to someone else. This all has to do with how our brains interpret the stimuli that is given. Chemoreception The senses of Gustation (taste) and Olfaction (smell) fall under the category of Chemoreception. Specialized cells act as receptors for certain chemical compounds. As these compounds react with the receptors, an impulse is sent to the brain and is registered as a certain taste or smell. Gustation and Olfaction are chemical senses because the receptors they contain are sensitive to the molecules in the food we eat, along with the air we breath.
    [Show full text]
  • Intrinsically Different Retinal Progenitor Cells Produce Specific Types Of
    PERSPECTIVES These clonal data demonstrated that OPINION RPCs are generally multipotent. However, these data could not determine whether Intrinsically different retinal the variability in clones was due to intrinsic differences among RPCs or extrinsic and/ progenitor cells produce specific or stochastic effects on equivalent RPCs or their progeny. Furthermore, the fates identi- fied within a clone demonstrated an RPC’s types of progeny ‘potential’ but not the ability of an RPC to make a specific cell type at a specific devel- Connie Cepko opmental time or its ‘competence’ (BOX 2). Moreover, although many genes that regu- Abstract | Lineage studies conducted in the retina more than 25 years ago late the development of retinal cell types demonstrated the multipotency of retinal progenitor cells (RPCs). The number have been studied, using the now classical and types of cells produced by individual RPCs, even from a single time point in gain- and loss‑of‑function approaches18,19, development, were found to be highly variable. This raised the question of the precise roles of such regulators in defin- whether this variability was due to intrinsic differences among RPCs or to extrinsic ing an RPC’s competence or potential have not been well elucidated, as most studies and/or stochastic effects on equivalent RPCs or their progeny. Newer lineage have examined the outcome of a perturba- studies that have made use of molecular markers of RPCs, retrovirus-mediated tion on the development of a cell type but lineage analyses of specific RPCs and live imaging have begun to provide answers not the stage and/or cell type in which such a to this question.
    [Show full text]
  • “Análisis De Los Receptores Tirosina Quinasa ALK, RET Y ROS En Los Adenocarcinomas Nasosinusales”
    Universidad de Oviedo Programa de Doctorado “Biomedicina y Oncología Molecular” “Análisis de los receptores tirosina quinasa ALK, RET y ROS en los adenocarcinomas nasosinusales” TESIS DOCTORAL Esteban Reinaldo Pacheco Coronel 20/02/2017 Universidad de Oviedo Programa de Doctorado “Biomedicina y Oncología Molecular” TESIS DOCTORAL “Análisis de los receptores tirosina quinasa ALK, RET y ROS en los adenocarcinomas nasosinusales” Autor: Directores: Esteban Reinaldo José Luís Llorente Pendás Pacheco Coronel Mario Hermsen Dedicatoria A mi familia y amigos, por estar siempre a mi lado y apoyarme en cada momento. Agradecimientos A José Luis por brindarme la oportunidad de trabajar en un tema ambicioso y muy interesante, por los buenos consejos y el tiempo invertido para que este proyecto salga adelante. A Mario, por su valiosa colaboración en el laboratorio, en el análisis de muestras e interpretación de resultados, sus enseñanzas de las diferentes técnicas aplicadas y manejo en el laboratorio; sus consejos sobre la metodología, resultados y conclusiones del proyecto. A mis compañeros del servicio de Otorrinolaringología del Hospital Central de Asturias por sus enseñanzas y el trabajo en equipo. A los compañeros del Instituto Universitario de Oncología del Principado de Asturias. Por que gracias a su trabajo hemos aprendido y desarrollado técnicas importantes para la elaboración de este proyecto. 1 ANTECEDENTES ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Introducción ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Notch-Signaling in Retinal Regeneration and Müller Glial Plasticity
    Notch-Signaling in Retinal Regeneration and Müller glial Plasticity DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Kanika Ghai, MS Neuroscience Graduate Studies Program The Ohio State University 2009 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Andy J Fischer, Advisor Dr. Heithem El-Hodiri Dr. Susan Cole Dr. Paul Henion Copyright by Kanika Ghai 2009 ABSTRACT Eye diseases such as blindness, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma are highly prevalent in the developed world, especially in a rapidly aging population. These sight-threatening diseases all involve the progressive loss of cells from the retina, the light-sensing neural tissue that lines the back of the eye. Thus, developing strategies to replace dying retinal cells or prolonging neuronal survival is essential to preserving sight. In this regard, cell-based therapies hold great potential as a treatment for retinal diseases. One strategy is to stimulate cells within the retina to produce new neurons. This dissertation elucidates the properties of the primary support cell in the chicken retina, known as the Müller glia, which have recently been shown to possess stem-cell like properties, with the potential to form new neurons in damaged retinas. However, the mechanisms that govern this stem-cell like ability are less well understood. In order to better understand these properties, we analyze the role of one of the key developmental processes, i.e., the Notch-Signaling Pathway in regulating proliferative, neuroprotective and regenerative properties of Müller glia and bestow them with this plasticity.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy and Physiology of the Afferent Visual System
    Handbook of Clinical Neurology, Vol. 102 (3rd series) Neuro-ophthalmology C. Kennard and R.J. Leigh, Editors # 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved Chapter 1 Anatomy and physiology of the afferent visual system SASHANK PRASAD 1* AND STEVEN L. GALETTA 2 1Division of Neuro-ophthalmology, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 2Neuro-ophthalmology Division, Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA INTRODUCTION light without distortion (Maurice, 1970). The tear–air interface and cornea contribute more to the focusing Visual processing poses an enormous computational of light than the lens does; unlike the lens, however, the challenge for the brain, which has evolved highly focusing power of the cornea is fixed. The ciliary mus- organized and efficient neural systems to meet these cles dynamically adjust the shape of the lens in order demands. In primates, approximately 55% of the cortex to focus light optimally from varying distances upon is specialized for visual processing (compared to 3% for the retina (accommodation). The total amount of light auditory processing and 11% for somatosensory pro- reaching the retina is controlled by regulation of the cessing) (Felleman and Van Essen, 1991). Over the past pupil aperture. Ultimately, the visual image becomes several decades there has been an explosion in scientific projected upside-down and backwards on to the retina understanding of these complex pathways and net- (Fishman, 1973). works. Detailed knowledge of the anatomy of the visual The majority of the blood supply to structures of the system, in combination with skilled examination, allows eye arrives via the ophthalmic artery, which is the first precise localization of neuropathological processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Specialized Cilia in Mammalian Sensory Systems
    Cells 2015, 4, 500-519; doi:10.3390/cells4030500 OPEN ACCESS cells ISSN 2073-4409 www.mdpi.com/journal/cells Review Specialized Cilia in Mammalian Sensory Systems Nathalie Falk, Marlene Lösl, Nadja Schröder and Andreas Gießl * Department of Biology, Animal Physiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91058 Erlangen, Germany; E-Mails: [email protected] (N.F.); [email protected] (M.L.); [email protected] (A.G.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-9131-85-28055; Fax: +49-9131-85-28060. Academic Editors: Gang Dong and William Tsang Received: 18 May 2015 / Accepted: 9 September 2015 / Published: 11 September 2015 Abstract: Cilia and flagella are highly conserved and important microtubule-based organelles that project from the surface of eukaryotic cells and act as antennae to sense extracellular signals. Moreover, cilia have emerged as key players in numerous physiological, developmental, and sensory processes such as hearing, olfaction, and photoreception. Genetic defects in ciliary proteins responsible for cilia formation, maintenance, or function underlie a wide array of human diseases like deafness, anosmia, and retinal degeneration in sensory systems. Impairment of more than one sensory organ results in numerous syndromic ciliary disorders like the autosomal recessive genetic diseases Bardet-Biedl and Usher syndrome. Here we describe the structure and distinct functional roles of cilia in sensory organs like the inner ear, the olfactory epithelium, and the retina of the mouse. The spectrum of ciliary function in fundamental cellular processes highlights the importance of elucidating ciliopathy-related proteins in order to find novel potential therapies.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Adult Neural Stem and Progenitor Cells in Physiology and Disease
    cells Review Diversity of Adult Neural Stem and Progenitor Cells in Physiology and Disease Zachary Finkel, Fatima Esteban, Brianna Rodriguez, Tianyue Fu, Xin Ai and Li Cai * Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; [email protected] (Z.F.); [email protected] (F.E.); [email protected] (B.R.); [email protected] (T.F.); [email protected] (X.A.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Adult neural stem and progenitor cells (NSPCs) contribute to learning, memory, main- tenance of homeostasis, energy metabolism and many other essential processes. They are highly heterogeneous populations that require input from a regionally distinct microenvironment including a mix of neurons, oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, ependymal cells, NG2+ glia, vasculature, cere- brospinal fluid (CSF), and others. The diversity of NSPCs is present in all three major parts of the CNS, i.e., the brain, spinal cord, and retina. Intrinsic and extrinsic signals, e.g., neurotrophic and growth factors, master transcription factors, and mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM), collectively regulate activities and characteristics of NSPCs: quiescence/survival, prolifer- ation, migration, differentiation, and integration. This review discusses the heterogeneous NSPC populations in the normal physiology and highlights their potentials and roles in injured/diseased states for regenerative medicine. Citation: Finkel, Z.; Esteban, F.; Keywords: central nervous system (CNS); ependymal cells; neural stem and progenitor cells (NSPC); Rodriguez, B.; Fu, T.; Ai, X.; Cai, L. NG2+ cells; neurodegenerative diseases; regenerative medicine; retina injury; spinal cord injury Diversity of Adult Neural Stem and (SCI); traumatic brain injury (TBI) Progenitor Cells in Physiology and Disease. Cells 2021, 10, 2045.
    [Show full text]
  • Miiller Cells Are a Preferred Substrate for in Vitro Neurite Extension by Rod Photoreceptor Cells
    The Journal of Neuroscience, October 1991, 1 l(10): 2985-2994 Miiller Cells Are a Preferred Substrate for in vitro Neurite Extension by Rod Photoreceptor Cells lvar J. Kljavin’ and Thomas A. Reh2 ‘Neuroscience Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Lion’s Sight Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N lN4 and ‘Department of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 To define the factors important in photoreceptor cell mor- (Silver and Sidman, 1980; Krayanek and Goldberg, 1981). Ad- phogenesis, we have examined the ability of rods to extend ditional studies have begun to characterize the moleculesthat neurites in vitro. Retinas from neonatal rats were dissociated are responsiblefor regulating the growth of ganglion cell axons and plated onto substrate-bound extracellular matrix (ECM) during development, and it appearsthat many of the ECM and components or cell monolayers. When rods, identified with cell adhesion molecules involved in axon outgrowth are con- monoclonal antibodies to opsin, were in contact exclusively centrated on the neuroepithelial cell end feet along these long with purified ECM (e.g., laminin, fibronectin, type I collagen, tracts (Silver and Rutishauser, 1984; Halfter et al., 1988). or Matrigel), neurite outgrowth was extremely limited. By However, during the normal development of the retina, as contrast, rods extended long neurites on Miiller cells. Retinal well as other areas of the CNS, most neurons do not extend or brain astrocytes, endothelial cells, 3T3 fibroblasts, or oth- axons into long pathways, but rather, their axons terminate on er retinal neurons were less supportive of rod process out- neighboring cells. In the retina, for example, the axons of the growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Physiology of the Retina
    PHYSIOLOGY OF THE RETINA András M. Komáromy Michigan State University [email protected] 12th Biannual William Magrane Basic Science Course in Veterinary and Comparative Ophthalmology PHYSIOLOGY OF THE RETINA • INTRODUCTION • PHOTORECEPTORS • OTHER RETINAL NEURONS • NON-NEURONAL RETINAL CELLS • RETINAL BLOOD FLOW Retina ©Webvision Retina Retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) Photoreceptor segments Outer limiting membrane (OLM) Outer nuclear layer (ONL) Outer plexiform layer (OPL) Inner nuclear layer (INL) Inner plexiform layer (IPL) Ganglion cell layer Nerve fiber layer Inner limiting membrane (ILM) ©Webvision Inherited Retinal Degenerations • Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) – Approx. 1 in 3,500 people affected • Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) – 15 Mio people affected in U.S. www.nei.nih.gov Mutations Causing Retinal Disease http://www.sph.uth.tmc.edu/Retnet/ Retina Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Histology Monkey (Macaca fascicularis) fovea Ultrahigh-resolution OCT Drexler & Fujimoto 2008 9 Adaptive Optics Roorda & Williams 1999 6 Types of Retinal Neurons • Photoreceptor cells (rods, cones) • Horizontal cells • Bipolar cells • Amacrine cells • Interplexiform cells • Ganglion cells Signal Transmission 1st order SPECIES DIFFERENCES!! Photoreceptors Horizontal cells 2nd order Bipolar cells Amacrine cells 3rd order Retinal ganglion cells Visual Pathway lgn, lateral geniculate nucleus Changes in Membrane Potential Net positive charge out Net positive charge in PHYSIOLOGY OF THE RETINA • INTRODUCTION • PHOTORECEPTORS • OTHER RETINAL NEURONS
    [Show full text]
  • Tuning and Topography in an Odor Map on the Rat Olfactory Bulb
    The Journal of Neuroscience, February 15, 2001, 21(4):1351–1360 Tuning and Topography in an Odor Map on the Rat Olfactory Bulb Markus Meister1,2 and Tobias Bonhoeffer2 1Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, and 2Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, D-82152 Munich- Martinsried, Germany The sense of smell originates in a diverse array of receptor centration dependence and yields the effective affinity with neurons, comprising up to 1000 different types. To understand which a glomerulus responds to an odorant. When tested with how these parallel channels encode chemical stimuli, we re- aliphatic molecules of increasing carbon chain length, many corded the responses of glomeruli in the olfactory bulbs of the glomeruli were sharply tuned for one or two adjacent chain anesthetized rat, by optical imaging of intrinsic signals. Odor lengths. Glomeruli with similar tuning properties were located stimulation produced two kinds of optical responses at the near each other, producing a systematic map of molecular surface of the bulb: a broad diffuse component superposed by chain length on the surface of the olfactory bulb. Given local discrete small spots. Histology showed that the spots corre- inhibitory circuits within the olfactory bulb, this can account for spond to individual glomeruli, and that ϳ400 of them can be the observed functional inhibition between related odors. We monitored in this way. Based on its wavelength-dependence, explore several parallels to the function and architecture of the this optical signal appears to derive from changes in light visual system that help interpret the neural representation of scattering during neural activity. Pure odorants generally acti- odors.
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Loss in Retinal Dystrophies by Apoptosis - Death by Informed Consent!
    186 British Journal of Ophthalmology 1995; 79: 186-190 PERSPECTIVE Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.79.2.186 on 1 February 1995. Downloaded from Cell loss in retinal dystrophies by apoptosis - death by informed consent! Cheryl Y Gregory, Alan C Bird For most inherited retinal dystrophies there is no satis- cell biologists have been fascinated by the phenomenon of factory treatment and this represents a significant health apoptosis as an alternative mode of cell death due to problem. In recent years molecular genetic studies have necrosis. Apoptosis is observed during embryogenesis had a marked impact on our understanding of inherited (termed histogenetic cell death) and normal cell retinal disease, and a number of causative mutations have turnover,18 and genetic regulation of the process has been been identified in retina specific genes.'- The reversal of implied.19 The purpose of apoptosis (or programmed cell disease by gene therapy in the retinal degeneration (rd) death) is to remove cells no longer required or which are and retinal degeneration slow (rds) mice by transgenic damaged in a controlled and coordinated manner. The rescue,7 8 has given rise to great interest in the use of gene mechanism for desirable cell death without detrimental therapy for retinal dystrophies in humans. However, there harm to an organism has evolved from a diverse evolu- are a number of problems to be overcome if this tech- tionary background.20 For example, cells that form the nology is to be practicable. These include limiting expres- xylem in plants die to allow conductance of fluid, and this sion of the gene to the correct cell at an appropriate level, also accounts for loss of the tadpole's tail during meta- identifying suitability of vectors for targeting the gene, and morphosis.
    [Show full text]