Hunting for Frozen Super-Earths Via Microlensing
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Astronomical Science Hunting for Frozen Super-Earths via Microlensing Jean-Philippe Beaulieu1,3 8 Boyden Observatory, University of of cold telluric planets. Its detection Michael Albrow1,4 the Free State, Department of Physics, confirms the power of this method and, Dave Bennett1,5 Bloemfontein, South Africa given our detection efficiency, suggests Stéphane Brillant 1,6 9 Astronomisches Rechen-Institut (ARI), that these recently-detected planets John A. R. Caldwell1,7 Zentrum für Astronomie, Universität may be quite common around M stars, Johannes J. Calitz1,8 Heidelberg, Germany as confirmed by subsequent detection Arnaud Cassan1,9 10 Lawrence Livermore National Labora- of a ~ 13 Earth-mass planet. Using a Kem H. Cook1,10 tory, Livermore, California, USA network of dedicated 1–2-m-class tele- Christian Coutures1,3 11 University of Tasmania, School of scopes, we have entered a new phase Stefan Dieters 1,11 Mathematics and Physics, Hobart, of planet discovery, and will be able to Martin Dominik1,2,12,13 Tasmania, Australia provide constraints on the abundance Dijana Dominis-Prester1,14 12 Scottish Universities Physics Alliance, of frozen Super-Earths in the near future. Jadzia Donatowicz1,15 University of St Andrews, School of Pascal Fouqué1,16 Physics and Astronomy, St Andrews, John Greenhill1,11 United Kingdom The discovery of extrasolar planets is ar- Kym Hill1,11 13 Royal Society University Research guably the most exciting development Matie Hoffman1,8 Fellow in astrophysics during the past decade, Uffe G. Jørgensen1,17 14 University of Rijeka, Physics Depart- rivalled only by the discovery of the cos- Stephen Kane1,18 ment, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, mic acceleration. The unexpected variety Daniel Kubas1,6 Rijeka, Croatia of giant exoplanets, some very close Jean-Baptiste Marquette1,3 15 Technische Universität Wien, Austria to their stars, many with high orbital ec- Ralph Martin1,19 16 Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées, Labora- centricity, has sparked a new generation Pieter Meintjes1,8 toire d’Astrophysique, Université Paul of observers and theorists to address John Menzies1,20 Sabatier, Toulouse, France the question of how planets form in the Karen Pollard1,4 17 Niels Bohr Institutet, Astronomisk context of protostellar accretion discs. Kailash Sahu1,21 Observatorium, København, Denmark Planets are now known to migrate and Christian Vinter1,17 18 Department of Astronomy, University of maybe even be ejected, via planet-disc Joachim Wambsganss1,9 Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA and planet-planet interactions. We are Andrew Williams1,19 19 Perth Observatory, Perth, Australia beginning to discover how our Solar Sys- Kristian Woller1,17 20 South African Astronomical Observa- tem fits into a broader community of Marta Zub1,9 tory planetary systems, many with very differ- Keith Horne1,2,12 21 Space Telescope Science Institute, ent properties. Microlensing-based Alasdair Allan 2,22 Baltimore, Maryland, USA searches play a critical role by probing for Mike Bode 2,23 22 eSTAR Project, School of Physics, cool planets with masses down to that Daniel M. Bramich1,2,24 University of Exeter, Devon, United of Earth. Of key interest is how planets Martin Burgdorf 2,23 Kingdom are distributed according to mass and or- Stephen Fraser 2,23 23 Astrophysics Research Institute, bital distance (Figure 1) as this information Chris Mottram 2,23 Liverpool John Moores University, provides a crucial test for theories of Nicholas Rattenbury 2,25 Birkenhead, United Kingdom planet formation. Core accretion models Colin Snodgrass 2,6 24 The Isaac Newton Group of Tele- (Ida and Lin, 2005) are today the best Iain Steele 2,23 scopes, Santa Cruz de La Palma, description for the formation of planetary Yiannis Tsapras 2,23 Canary Islands systems: the accretion of planetesimals 25 The University of Manchester, Jodrell leads to the formation of cores, which Bank Observatory, Macclesfield, then start to accrete gas from the primi- 1 PLANET Collaboration Cheshire, United Kingdom tive nebula. This scenario predicts that for 2 RoboNet Collaboration M dwarf stars there is a preferential for- 3 Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, mation of Earth- to Neptune-mass planets CNRS, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, In order to obtain a census of planets in 1–10 AU orbits. These planets are ex- Paris, France with masses in the range of Earth to pected to form within a few million years. 4 University of Canterbury, Department Jupiter, eight telescopes are being used More massive planet (Jupiter) formation of Physics and Astronomy, by the combined microlensing cam- is hampered by a longer formation time Christchurch, New Zealand paign of the PLANET and RoboNet col- (10 Myr) during which the gas evaporates 5 University of Notre Dame, Department laborations for high-cadence photo- and is no longer available to be accreted. of Physics, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA metric round-the-clock follow-up of 6 ESO ongoing events, alerted by the OGLE There is a wide variety of planets and at 7 McDonald Observatory, Fort Davis, and MOA surveys. In 2005 we detected first sight it appears that our system Texas, USA a planet of 5.5 Earth masses at 2.6 AU is very special. However, our view of the from its parent 0.22 MA M star. This whole picture is still blurred by obser- object is the first member of a new class vational biases inherent to the detection The Messenger 128 – June 2007 33 Astronomical Science Beaulieu J.-P. et al., Hunting for Frozen Super-Earths via Microlensing techniques using transits and radial ve- Known exoplanets: 11 + 180 + 4 = 195 (January 2007) locities. Both methods are more sensitive Orbit period in years (for Solar-mass star) to massive planets close to their parent 3 d 30 d 1yr 10 yr 100 yr star. Doppler measurements and the 4 Doppler: 180 space transit missions, such as COROT, 10 can already, or will shortly, be able to de- 1000 tect Neptune-mass planets close to their t, µFUN parent star. Direct detections fill the other J extreme of very large separations which 100 S are unknown in our Solar System. It is ET/RoboNe Kec therefore necessary to use different tech- k, VL N 10 TI U niques, each probing different areas of , HAT SIM the planet-mass versus orbital distance OGLE, TrES, WASP parameter space. 1 V E MPF OGLE, MOA, PLAN Planet mass in Earths Kepler Already with ground-based observations, 0.1 M the microlensing technique is sensitive M to cool planets with masses down to that 0.01 Transits: 11 (+ 3) Microlensing: 4 of the Earth orbiting 0.1–1 MA stars, the Astrometry: 0 most common stars of our Galaxy, in or- P bits of 1–10 AU. Currently, over 700 micro- 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 lensing events towards the Galactic Bulge Orbit radius in Astronomical Units (AU) are alerted in real time by the OGLE and MOA surveys each year. During these Figure 1 (above): Exoplanet discovery space (planet Figure 2 (below): The left panel shows the caustic events, a source star is temporarily mag- mass versus orbit size) showing the 8 planets from structure of a star/planet lens, with two possible tra- our Solar System (labelled as letters), 180 Doppler jectories of a source star. The right panel shows nified by the gravitational potential of wobble planets (black triangles), 11 transit planets the corresponding observed light curves. Hitting the an intervening lens star passing near the (blue circled crosses), and 4 microlensing planets planetary caustic, or passing close to it, induces a line of sight, with an impact parameter (red circled crosses). Also outlined are the regions short-lived but clearly detectable photometric signal. smaller than the Einstein ring radius RE, a that can be probed by different methods: Doppler, transits; astrometry; and microlensing from the quantity which depends on the mass of ground and space. Microlensing is a cost-efficient the lens, and the geometry of the align- way to measure the mass function of cool planets ment. For a source star in the Bulge, with down to the mass of the Earth. a 0.3 MA lens, RE ~ 2 AU, the projected angular Einstein ring radius is ~ 1 mas, and 0.10 Mass ratio q = 0.002 Impact angle = 271.0 (deg) Impact angle = 50.0 (deg) the time to transit RE is typically 20–30 Separation d = 1.2 days, but can be in the range 5–100 days. 17.5 0.05 A planet orbiting the lens star generates a Planetary caustic E Central caustic 18.0 caustic structure in the source plane, with θ / 2 0.00 one small caustic around the centre of θ -Band magnitude mass of the system, the central caustic, I –0.05 and one or two larger caustics further 18.5 away, the planetary caustics. If the source star happens to reach the vicinity of one –0.10 of the caustics, its magnification is signifi- –0.10 –0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 2520 2540 2560 2580 HJD - 2.450.000 cantly altered as compared to a single θ1/θE lens, resulting in a brief peak or dip in the observed light curve. the detection of planets in such events space to derive the planet/star mass ratio becomes highly efficient (Griest and q, and the projected separation d in units The duration of such planetary lensing Safizadeh 1998). In contrast, planetary of RE. In general, model distributions for anomalies scales with the square root of caustics are only approached for a spe- the spatial mass density of the Milky Way, the planet’s mass, lasting typically a cific range of orientations of the source the velocities of potential lens and source few hours (for an Earth) to 2–3 days (for a trajectory, but the characterisation of a stars, and a mass function of the lens Jupiter).