DOCSLIB.ORG

The Iphigenia in Tauris of Euripides; Online

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Iphigenia in Tauris of Euripides; Online cWtqn (Download) The Iphigenia in Tauris of Euripides; Online [cWtqn.ebook] The Iphigenia in Tauris of Euripides; Pdf Free Euripides, Murray Gilbert 1866-1957 ebooks | Download PDF | *ePub | DOC | audiobook 2016-05-04Original language:English 9.21 x .31 x 6.14l, .78 #File Name: 1355439914 | File size: 53.Mb Euripides, Murray Gilbert 1866-1957 : The Iphigenia in Tauris of Euripides; before purchasing it in order to gage whether or not it would be worth my time, and all praised The Iphigenia in Tauris of Euripides;: 1 of 1 people found the following review helpful. Euripides solves the mystery of Iphigenia after AuliusBy Lawrance BernaboAt the end of "Iphigenia at Aulius," when the virgin daughter of Agamemnon is about to sacrificed offstage to appease the goddess Artemis, as the fatal blow is struck the young girl disappears and a stage appears in its place. Thus, at the last minute, Euripides refrains from suggesting a goddess demanded a human sacrifice. But what happened to the young girl? The dramatist provides his answer in "Iphigenia in Tauris" Artemis saved Iphigenia and brought her to the temple of the goddess in Tauris (which is in Thrace, although others take this to mean the Crimea). Meanwhile, her brother Orestes, still trying to appease the Furies for his crime of matricide, is ordered by the god Apollo to bring the statue of Artemis from Tauris to Athens. However, the Taurians have the quaint habit of sacrificing strangers to the goddess (so much for the goddess disdaining human sacrifice). Once again, Euripides is showing his disdain for Apollo; at first consideration you might think Apollo is setting up the reconciliation of brother and sister, but since it is up to the goddess Athena to help the pair, and Orestes's friend Pylades, to escape, the clearly implication is that Apollo wants Orestes dead."Iphigenia in Taurus" ("Iphigeneia en Taurois," which is also translated as "Iphigenia among the Taurians") is really more of a tragicomedy than a traditional Greek tragedy. Basically it consists of a key scene of recognition ("anagnorisis") and a clever escape by the main characters. The recognition scene between Orestes and Iphigenia is well done, and so atypical in that there is joy in the "anagnorisis" rather than pain or death (cf. "Oedipus the King"). "Iphigenia in Tauris" takes place after the Orestia trilogy by Aeschylus (Athena refers to the events of the final play), and one of the more interesting elements of this play is the idea that Orestes had been hallucinating when he was seeing the Furies pursuing him. This is a rather rational explanation for his behavior following the murder of Clytemnestra and Aegithus.I was rather surprised to discover that Euripides wrote "Iphigenia in Tauris" in 413 BC, which was years before "Iphigenia at Aulis" was first performed in 406. I had naturally assumed that Euripides was following the character's chronology, but apparently this is not the case. My preference has always been for the latter play, but this is based on my interest in how Euripides foreshadows the conflict between Agamemnon and Achilles that serves as the opening conflict of Homer's epic poem, "The Iliad." This also speaks to the fact that to successfully teach and/or really appreciate this play, you simply have to understand the entire background of the characters, both in terms of "Iphigenia at Aulis" and "The Orestia." Certainly this can be done in the classroom through summaries of these plays, but it most assuredly has to be done.7 of 9 people found the following review helpful. Euripides solves the mystery of Iphigenia after AulisBy Lawrance BernaboAt the end of "Iphigenia at Aulius," when the virgin daughter of Agamemnon is about to sacrificed offstage to appease the goddess Artemis, as the fatal blow is struck the young girl disappears and a stage appears in its place. Thus, at the last minute, Euripides refrains from suggesting a goddess demanded a human sacrifice. But what happened to the young girl? The dramatist provides his answer in "Iphigenia in Tauris" Artemis saved Iphigenia and brought her to the temple of the goddess in Tauris (which is in Thrace, although others take this to mean the Crimea). Meanwhile, her brother Orestes, still trying to appease the Furies for his crime of matricide, is ordered by the god Apollo to bring the statue of Artemis from Tauris to Athens. However, the Taurians have the quaint habit of sacrificing strangers to the goddess (so much for the goddess disdaining human sacrifice). Once again, Euripides is showing his disdain for Apollo; at first consideration you might think Apollo is setting up the reconciliation of brother and sister, but since it is up to the goddess Athena to help the pair, and Orestes's friend Pylades, to escape, the clearly implication is that Apollo wants Orestes dead."Iphigenia in Taurus" ("Iphigeneia en Taurois," which is also translated as "Iphigenia among the Taurians") is really more of a tragicomedy than a traditional Greek tragedy. Basically it consists of a key scene of recognition ("anagnorisis") and a clever escape by the main characters. The recognition scene between Orestes and Iphigenia is well done, and so atypical in that there is joy in the "anagnorisis" rather than pain or death (cf. "Oedipus the King"). "Iphigenia in Tauris" takes place after the Orestia trilogy by Aeschylus (Athena refers to the events of the final play), and one of the more interesting elements of this play is the idea that Orestes had been hallucinating when he was seeing the Furies pursuing him. This is a rather rational explanation for his behavior following the murder of Clytemnestra and Aegithus.I was rather surprised to discover that Euripides wrote "Iphigenia in Tauris" in 413 BC, which was years before "Iphigenia at Aulis" was first performed in 406. I had naturally assumed that Euripides was following the character's chronology, but apparently this is not the case. My preference has always been for the latter play, but this is based on my interest in how Euripides foreshadows the conflict between Agamemnon and Achilles that serves as the opening conflict of Homer's epic poem, "The Iliad." This also speaks to the fact that to successfully teach and/or really appreciate this play, you simply have to understand the entire background of the characters, both in terms of "Iphigenia at Aulis" and "The Orestia." Certainly this can be done in the classroom through summaries of these plays, but it most assuredly has to be done. This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant. "This fine translation of the play is enhanced by the informative introduction and notes and by a useful glossary. it's an excellent text to use in class."--A. Nicholas Fargnoli, Malloy CollegeLanguage NotesText: English Original Language: GreekAbout the AuthorEuripides, the youngest of the three great Athenian playwrights, is thought to have written about ninety-two plays, of which seventeen tragedies and one satyr-play have survived. [cWtqn.ebook] The Iphigenia in Tauris of Euripides; By Euripides, Murray Gilbert 1866-1957 PDF [cWtqn.ebook] The Iphigenia in Tauris of Euripides; By Euripides, Murray Gilbert 1866-1957 Epub [cWtqn.ebook] The Iphigenia in Tauris of Euripides; By Euripides, Murray Gilbert 1866-1957 Ebook [cWtqn.ebook] The Iphigenia in Tauris of Euripides; By Euripides, Murray Gilbert 1866-1957 Rar [cWtqn.ebook] The Iphigenia in Tauris of Euripides; By Euripides, Murray Gilbert 1866-1957 Zip [cWtqn.ebook] The Iphigenia in Tauris of Euripides; By Euripides, Murray Gilbert 1866-1957 Read Online.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Study in Form: Recognition Scenes in the Three Electra Plays*
    A Study in Form: Recognition Scenes in the Three Electra Plays* The effects of recognition have to do with know- ledge and the means of acquiring it, with secrets, disguises, lapses of memory, clues, signs, and the like, and this no doubt explains the odd, almost asymmetrical positioning of anagnorisis in the domain of poetics… Structure and theme, poetics and interpretation, are curiously combined in this term… Terence Cave1 The fortuitous survival of three plays by each of the three tragic poets on the same story offers an unparalleled opportunity to consider some of the formal aspects of the genre, those which dictate the limits and possibilities of its dramatic enactment. Three salient elements constitute the irreducible minimum that characterizes the Orestes-Electra plot and is by necessity common to all three versions. These consist of nostos (return), anagnorisis (recognition) and mechanêma (the intrigue). This se- quence is known to us already from the Odyssey as the masterplot in the story of Odysseus himself and his return home, and it will come into play once again, nota- bly in Euripides’ version. Yet, at the same time, the Odyssey already contains the story of Orestes, who returns home to avenge his father, and it is this deed that pro- vides a contrapuntal line to the main story, which is that of the trials of Odysseus, his homecoming, his eventual vengeance on the suitors, and revelation of identity to friends and kin. The epic, however, gives only the bare facts of Orestes’ deed, which are recorded at the very outset in the proem (Od.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Recognition and its Dilemmas in Roman Epic Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4hn808p4 Author Librandi, Diana Publication Date 2021 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Recognition and its Dilemmas in Roman Epic A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classics by Diana Librandi 2021 © Copyright by Diana Librandi 2021 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Recognition and its Dilemmas in Roman Epic by Diana Librandi Doctor of Philosophy in Classics University of California, Los Angeles, 2021 Professor Francesca Katherine Martelli, Chair The present dissertation examines the widespread presence of tropes of tragic recognition in Roman epic poetry from an interdisciplinary perspective. I argue that Roman epic poets draw at once on tragedy and ancient philosophy to address the cognitive instability generated by civil war, an event which recurrently marks the history of Rome since its foundation. When civil conflicts arise, the shifting categories of friend and enemy, kin and stranger, victor and vanquished, generate a constant renegotiation of individual identities and interpersonal relationships. It is in light of these destabilizing changes that I interpret the Roman epic trend of pairing civil war narratives with instances of tragic recognition. Far from working exclusively as a plot device or as a marker of the interaction between the genres of epic and tragedy, tropes of tragic recognition in Roman epic are conducive to exploring the epistemological and ethical dilemmas posed by civil war.
    [Show full text]
  • Iphigenia Among the Taurians As a Real Tragedy
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ELTE Digital Institutional Repository (EDIT) EURIPIDES UNDER THE “HAPPY ENDING” EMPIRE: IPHIGENIA AMONG THE TAURIANS AS A REAL TRAGEDY MARINA SOLÍS DE OVANDO A far away and strange land, a story shrouded in mystery, and a great and perfect happy ending—all of these factors have been considered by the majority of scholars as proof of the following point: Iphigenia among the Taurians is not a real tragedy. This paper demonstrates the opposite. Few would deny that we are faced with an evasive melodrama. Almost a novel on stage, the play shows us how Euripides was simply trying to entertain his audience—forgetting the classic objective of Greek tragedy, overlooking the desire to show a universal truth through the symbol within the myth. An in-depth study of the resources used by Euripides, however, as well as a new reading, free from pre-conceived ideas, reveals tragic elements inside the story, a spectacle full of phóbos, éleos and kátharsis and a deep, painful, woeful message, screaming against the Peloponnesian War. Thus, we aim to revise Euripidean theatre, which is more human and less scientific, more closely related to its historical context, and somewhat less bound to modern preconceptions and analyses. Introduction Iphigenia among the Taurians: a tragedy? I begin by declaring my intentions for this paper as clearly as possible. This paper focuses mainly on new questions, on opening new doors, and exploring doubts, rather than on striving to offer a clear and comprehensive answer.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Theatre and Tragedy: an Introduction to Antigone
    Monday, September 17th For tomorrow, please make sure you’ve read Oedipus Rex: Prologue - Ode 2 (pp. 3-47). We’ll begin class by discussing your questions, so please make notes in your text As you begin reading, consider how the crisis unfolds How is Oedipus initially characterized? Use your notes to guide your annotations If you do not have a book, there is a copy posted on my website. Greek Theater and Tragedy: An Introduction An Introduction to Greek Theatre *this is not in your notes… it’s a preview Lecture Outline I. Greek Theater i. Role of theater in society ii. Conventions of Greek drama ▪ Staging ▪ Actors ▪ The chorus II. Greek Tragedy i. Defining characteristics ii. Aristotle ▪ Theory of tragedy ▪ Aristotelian unities iii. Dramatic structure iv. The tragic hero v. Sophocles ▪ Background ▪ The Sophoclean Hero III. Oedipus IV. Antigone In the grander scheme of Greek literature… Supposedly written toward the mid to end of the 8th century B.C. i.e. latter part of the 700s B.C. A few CENTURIES pass… Focus on heroic exploits of Focus on individual suffering, events an individual, high depicted are increasingly tragic, minimal adventure, war, action, etc. to no direct interaction with gods Heavy interaction with Gods i. Role of Theater in Society Theater was a religious & civic occasion in 5th century B.C. The plays (comedy, satyr, tragedy) were performed annually at festivals in honor of Dionysus, god of wine, revelry, and theater were entered in a competition (between 3 playwrights) and voted on Plots drawn from mythic or legendary events of the past i.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Aristotle's Theory of Tragedy
    Outline of Aristotle's Theory of Tragedy in the POETICS Definition of Tragedy: “Tragedy, then, is an imitation of an action that is serious, complete, and of a certain magnitude; in language embellished with each kind of artistic ornament, the several kinds being found in separate parts of the play; in the form of action, not of narrative; with incidents arousing pity and fear, wherewith to accomplish its katharsis of such emotions. Every Tragedy, therefore, must have six parts, which parts determine its quality—namely, Plot, Characters, Diction, Thought, Spectacle, Melody.” The treatise we call the Poetics was composed at least 50 years after the death of Sophocles. Aristotle was a great admirer of Sophocles’ Oedipus the King, considering it the perfect tragedy, and not surprisingly, his analysis fits that play most perfectly. I shall therefore use this play to illustrate the following major parts of Aristotle's analysis of tragedy as a literary genre. Tragedy is the “imitation of an action” (mimesis) according to “the law of probability or necessity.” Aristotle indicates that the medium of tragedy is drama, not narrative; tragedy “shows” rather than “tells.” According to Aristotle, tragedy is higher and more philosophical than history because history simply relates what has happened while tragedy dramatizes what may happen, “what is possible according to the law of probability or necessity.” History thus deals with the particular, and tragedy with the universal. Events that have happened may be due to accident or coincidence; they may be particular to a specific situation and not be part of a clear cause-and-effect chain.
    [Show full text]
  • Marlowe and Calderã³n
    Inti: Revista de literatura hispánica Volume 1 Number 5 Article 13 1977 In the Shade of the Tree of Knowledge: Marlowe and Calderón Wm. Lewis Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.providence.edu/inti Part of the Fiction Commons, Latin American Literature Commons, Modern Literature Commons, and the Poetry Commons Citas recomendadas Lewis, Wm. (Primavera-Otoño 1977) "In the Shade of the Tree of Knowledge: Marlowe and Calderón," Inti: Revista de literatura hispánica: No. 5, Article 13. Available at: https://digitalcommons.providence.edu/inti/vol1/iss5/13 This Artículos is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Providence. It has been accepted for inclusion in Inti: Revista de literatura hispánica by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@Providence. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IN THE SHADE OF THE TREE OF KNOWLEDGE: MARLOWE AND CALDERÓN Wm. Lewis Juxtaposing The Tragedy of Doctor Faustus and La gran comedia del mágico prodigioso may seem an idle attempt to compare the proverbial apples and oranges. Such comparison has rarely been made in a work of any length. The most salient common element of the two plays makes it inevitable, however, that some comparison of them be included in a work entitled "Chapters on Magic." Therein Samuel M. Waxman asked: Does Calderón's Cypriano resemble Doctor Faustus in any way? No. Faustus is a wandering scholar, the loose-living conjurer of the Renaissance; Cypriano is the pagan philosopher on the threshold of Christianity. He makes a pact, it is true, to gain possession of a woman, but we are not concerned with his conjurer's tricks as is the case with Faustus .
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Dramatic Tragedy and Aristotle's Poetics: a Comparison
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1987 Modern Dramatic Tragedy and Aristotle's Poetics: A Comparison Kimberly John Babcock College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Modern Literature Commons, Philosophy Commons, and the Theatre and Performance Studies Commons Recommended Citation Babcock, Kimberly John, "Modern Dramatic Tragedy and Aristotle's Poetics: A Comparison" (1987). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625396. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-wdc6-xk68 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MODERN DRAMATIC TRAGEDY AND ARISTOTLE'S POETICS: A COMPARISON A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of English The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirement for the Degree of Master of Arts by Kimberly John Babcock 1987 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of The requirement for the degree of Master of Arts Approved, October 1987 'hilip Aislander Scott Donaldson To Tuckerman Alexander Babcock my best friend, who urged me on and sacrificed to follow me. You made it one of the best years of my life. And to William T. Lovell I miss you. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................ I DEDICATION................ ............................... II ABSTRACT................... Ill CHAPTER ONE.............................................. 2 CHAPTER TWO..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Anagnorisis and Its Use in Euripides William P
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1935 The Anagnorisis and Its Use in Euripides William P. Le Saint Loyola University Chicago Recommended Citation Le Saint, William P., "The Anagnorisis and Its Use in Euripides" (1935). Master's Theses. Paper 264. http://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/264 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1935 William P. Le Saint 1 ... liS5 .A. tIl•• l. aulai.... _ 1a ,.ntaJ. tal.~Sll ...t .1' til. ~lrta.. t. ~.r tlt.e 4egree .~ lIaater .~ .Art. 1Jl LeJela lJalTeralt7. Vita A.oteri. 'I1ll1_ Paul Le Saia-t •• bora 11\ K_plU., 1faD.•••••• :ru. 18. 1~8. He _y.4 "- C1no1ua-ti, Ollio, 11\ 191" _ere h. at-tea4... st. )lark'e Paroohial SoUol and St. xay1.r Hip SolaM1. He entered S-t. xavler Cell.p 11\ 19215 aa4 KUtord Boy1 tlaw ot tao Soo1e-tT ot :r•• e 1l'l 1926. He re.. 1"'" hle .A.. B. t:rca xa'9'1er lJnlyer81tT 1a 1931; taupt at S-t. J"olul'. Hip Sollool in '1'0104. lu.rillg the e ..ol 7M1" of 19aJ.-1912; _tere4 St. Lou1e Uniftrsit7 Graduate Sw.l in the tall ot 1932 .., truet.rre4 "- x..yela 1a th. tall ot 191•• 1'.A.BL1I: OF CON'f'Jm'S ., Pap IDtrotuo'Uem 1 Part the J'ir8t Ch.apter I .Ari8totle' 8 .pha8i8 em .Allapori8i.
    [Show full text]
  • Anagnorisis in His Poetics, As Part of His Discussion of Peripeteia
    Anagnorisis In his Poetics, as part of his discussion of peripeteia, Aristotle defined anagnorisis as "a change from ignorance to knowledge, producing love or hate between the persons destined by the poet for good or bad fortune" (1452a). It is often discussed along with Aristotle's concept of catharsis. Anagnorisis, Greek meaning “recognition”, in a literary work, the startling discovery that produces a change from ignorance to knowledge. It is discussed by Aristotle in the Poetics as an essential part of the plot of a tragedy, although anagnorisis occurs in comedy, epic, and, at a later date, the novel as well. Anagnorisis usually involves revelation of the true identity of persons previously unknown, as when a father recognizes a stranger as his son, or vice versa. One of the finest occurs in Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex when a messenger reveals to Oedipus his true birth, and Oedipus recognizes his wife Jocasta as his mother, the man he slew at the crossroads as his father, and himself as the unnatural sinner who brought misfortune on Thebes. This recognition is the more artistically satisfying because it is accompanied by a peripeteia (“reversal”), the shift in fortune from good to bad that moves on to the tragic catastrophe. An anagnorisis is not always accompanied by a peripeteia, as in the Odyssey, when Alcinous, ruler of Phaeacia, has his minstrel entertain a shipwrecked stranger with songs of the Trojan War, and the stranger begins to weep and reveals himself as none other than Odysseus. Aristotle discusses several kinds of anagnorisis employed by dramatists. The simplest kind, used, as he says, “from poverty of wit,” is recognition by scars, birthmarks, or tokens.
    [Show full text]
  • Aristotle's Theory of Tragedy (Pdf)
    Aritotle's definition of tragedy: “Tragedy is an imitation of an action that is serious, complete, and of a certain magnitude; in language embellished with each kind of artistic ornament, [...]; with incidents arousing pity and fear, wherewith to accomplish its katharsis of such emotions.” (Aristotle, Poetics, Book V) Tragedy is drama – not narrative; it shows rather than tells. Tragedy deals with the fundamental order of the universe; it creates a cause-and-effect chain that clearly reveals what may happen at any time. Tragedy arouses not only pity but also fear, because the audience can envision themselves within this cause-and-effect chain. The plot must be “a whole,” with a beginning, middle, and end. The beginning must start the cause- and-effect chain, but not be dependent on anything outside the compass of the play. The middle, or climax, must be caused by earlier incidents and itself cause the incidents that follow it. The end, or resolution, must be caused by the preceding events but not lead to other incidents outside the compass of the play. The plot must be “of a certain magnitude,”because the more universal and significant the meaning of the play, the more the playwright can catch and hold the emotions of the audience. Important terms: The main character in a tragedy has a tragic flaw, there is something “wrong with him”, that leads to his tragic end. The tragic flaw is called hamartia. Usually there is also some sort of chaotic element involved in the character's downfall; the chaotic element may be events that can not be controlled by the character – bad luck, bad weather etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Aeschylus and Aristotle's Theory of Tragedy
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1946 Aeschylus and Aristotle's Theory of Tragedy Daniel J. Campbell Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the Classical Literature and Philology Commons Recommended Citation Campbell, Daniel J., "Aeschylus and Aristotle's Theory of Tragedy" (1946). Master's Theses. 88. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/88 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1946 Daniel J. Campbell AESCHYLUS L~ ARISTOTLE'S THEORY OF TRAGEDY By Daniel J. Campbell, S.J. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements tor the Degree of Master ot Arts in Loyola University December 1946 VITA Daniel J. Campbell was born in New Liskeard, Ontario, Canada, August 17, 1916. He was graduated from Middleport High Scool, Middleport, New York, June, 1934, and entered Fordham University the following September. In July, 1935, he entered the Society of' Jesus at Saint Andrew­ on-Hudson, Pbughkeepsie, New York. In September, 1939, he began his course in Philosophy at St. Ignatius House of' Studies, Manhasset, Long Island, New York, and completed the last two years of the three year course at West Baden College, West Baden, Indiana. Here the Bachelor of' Arts degree was co~erred by Loyola University, June, 1941.
    [Show full text]
  • Anagnorisis in Ethan Frome: in the Aporia of Determinism and Moral Inertia
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Anagnorisis in Ethan Frome: In the Aporia of Determinism and Moral Inertia Masanao FURUHASHI 『イーサン・フロム』におけるアナグノリシス ――決定論と道徳的イナーシャの狭間で 古橋 昌尚 Abstract Ethan Frome, Edith Wharton’s widely-known novel, can be read as a naturalistic work. This novel has a deterministic tendency and amorality in the plot as its characteristics, in other words, “inevitability” and Wharton’s morally non-judgmental attitude. The tragedy of Ethan Frome (1911) can be fairly attributed to the socially, culturally, and environmentally deterministic factors in the protagonist’s settings. Besides, Ethan does not actively make moral decisions, which Trilling calls “moral inertia.” This tendency, on top of his inclination for giving himself to fantasy, finally leads him to a tragedy. Wagner and Demoor contend with the interpellation theory that “the narrative story is … no more than a fabricated picture framed to defend a manufactured hero.” In fact, the narrator’s presentation provides the evidence which is far from his being a hero. Furthermore, Ethan’s tragedy has something to do with his weakness, the tendency to escape reality to the world of illusion, which leads him to avoid making moral decisions. Ethan and Mattie, finding no way out, take sled-rides into the world of beauty, silence and rest, which tempts them to escape from the severe reality of this world. Ethan’s anagnorisis, recognition about who he is in the actual world, occurs when he finds no way out of Starkfield and Zeena, where the peripeteia (sudden fall) of the plot starts.
    [Show full text]