Garden Reflections Designed Artfully, Still Water Features Mirror Plantings and Provide an Air of Tranquility in a Garden
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate. -
Caracterizacion De Semillas De Algunas Plantas Medicinales Mas Frecuentes En Coahuila Y Nuevo Leon
UNIVERSIDAD AUTONOMA AGRARIA “ANTONIO NARRO” DIVISION DE AGRONOMIA CARACTERIZACION DE SEMILLAS DE ALGUNAS PLANTAS MEDICINALES MAS FRECUENTES EN COAHUILA Y NUEVO LEON. POR JORGE CRESCENCIANO RUIZ BASURTO TESIS PRESENTADA COMO REQUISITO PARCIAL PARA OBTENER EL TITULO DE: INGENIERO AGRONOMO EN PRODUCCION. SALTILLO, COAHUILA, MÉXICO , OCTUBRE DEL 2000 UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA AGRARIA “ANTONIO NARRO” “ CARACTERIZACION DE SEMILLAS DE ALGUNAS PLANTAS MEDICINALES MAS FRECUENTES EN COAHUILA Y NUEVO LEON” POR JORGE CRESCENCIANO RUIZ BASURTO QUE SOMETE A CONSIDERACION DEL HONORABLE JURADO EXAMINADOR COMO REQUISITO PARCIAL PARA OBTENER EL TÍTULO DE INGENIERO AGRÓNOMO EN PRODUCCION. APROBADA POR: PRESIDENTE DEL JURADO M C. LEOPOLDO ARCE GONZALEZ SINODAL SINODAL _____________________________ _____________________________ DR. JESUS VALDEZ REYNA ING. JOSE A. DE LA CRUZ BRETON SINODAL _______________________________ BIOL. MIGUELA.CARRANZA PEREZ COORDINACION DE LA DIVISIÓN DE AGRONOMÍA: ______________________________________________ M.C. REYNALDO ALONSO VELASCO BUENAVISTA , SALTILLO, COAHUILA, MÉXICO, OCTUBRE DEL 2000 ii DEDICATORIA A DIOS. Dedico el presente trabajo a mi dios Jehova, con toda mi fe, por darme la fuerza espiritual, inteligencia, capacidad y competencia para lograr mis objetivos y mis metas. A MIS PADRES. SR. VALENTIN RUIZ GUZMAN. MARGARITA BASURTO GALINDO. Con todo el cariño, amor y respeto por darme derecho a la vida, por darme fuerza de voluntad, por comprender y respetar mis actos y mis ideas, por ser mis consejeros, quienes con su esfuerzo me dieron bendiciones y su gran apoyo en los momentos más difíciles de mi vida, y han hecho de mi un hombre de bien y ahora ven culminado uno de sus más grandes anhelos. Dios los guarde eternamente. A MIS HERMANOS Y HERMANAS. -
US Fish and Wildlife Service
BARNEBY REED-MUSTARD (S. barnebyi ) CLAY REED-MUSTARD SHRUBBY REED-MUSTARD (S,arguillacea) (S. suffrutescens) .-~ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service UTAH REED—MUSTARDS: CLAY REED-MUSTARD (SCHOENOCRAMBE ARGILLACEA) BARNEBY REED—MUSTARD (SCHOENOCRAMBE BARNEBYI) SI-IRUBBY REED-MUSTARD (SCHOENOCRAMBE SUFFRUTESCENS) RECOVERY PLAN Prepared by Region 6, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Approved: Date: (~19~- Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions which are believed to be required to recover and/or protect the species. Plans are prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will only be attained and funds expended contingent upon appropriations, priorities, and other budgetary constraints. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or approvals of any individuals or agencies, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, involved in the plan formulation. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director or Director as an~roved Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature Citation should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1994. Utah reed—mustards: clay reed—mustard (Schoenocrambe argillacea), Barneby reed-mustard (Schoenocrambe barnebyl), shrubby reed—mustard (Schoenacranibe suffrutescens) recovery plan. Denver, Colorado. 22 pp. Additional copies may be purchased from: Fish and Wildlife Reference Service 5430 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 110 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Telephone: 301/492—6403 or 1—800—582—3421 The fee for the plan varies depending on the number of pages of the plan. -
Untangling Phylogenetic Patterns and Taxonomic Confusion in Tribe Caryophylleae (Caryophyllaceae) with Special Focus on Generic
TAXON 67 (1) • February 2018: 83–112 Madhani & al. • Phylogeny and taxonomy of Caryophylleae (Caryophyllaceae) Untangling phylogenetic patterns and taxonomic confusion in tribe Caryophylleae (Caryophyllaceae) with special focus on generic boundaries Hossein Madhani,1 Richard Rabeler,2 Atefeh Pirani,3 Bengt Oxelman,4 Guenther Heubl5 & Shahin Zarre1 1 Department of Plant Science, Center of Excellence in Phylogeny of Living Organisms, School of Biology, College of Science, University of Tehran, P.O. Box 14155-6455, Tehran, Iran 2 University of Michigan Herbarium-EEB, 3600 Varsity Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108-2228, U.S.A. 3 Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, P.O. Box 91775-1436, Mashhad, Iran 4 Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, 40530 Göteborg, Sweden 5 Biodiversity Research – Systematic Botany, Department of Biology I, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Menzinger Str. 67, 80638 München, Germany; and GeoBio Center LMU Author for correspondence: Shahin Zarre, [email protected] DOI https://doi.org/10.12705/671.6 Abstract Assigning correct names to taxa is a challenging goal in the taxonomy of many groups within the Caryophyllaceae. This challenge is most serious in tribe Caryophylleae since the supposed genera seem to be highly artificial, and the available morphological evidence cannot effectively be used for delimitation and exact determination of taxa. The main goal of the present study was to re-assess the monophyly of the genera currently recognized in this tribe using molecular phylogenetic data. We used the sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and the chloroplast gene rps16 for 135 and 94 accessions, respectively, representing all 16 genera currently recognized in the tribe Caryophylleae, with a rich sampling of Gypsophila as one of the most heterogeneous groups in the tribe. -
ASTERACEAE José Ángel Villarreal-Quintanilla* José Luis Villaseñor-Ríos** Rosalinda Medina-Lemos**
FLORA DEL VALLE DE TEHUACÁN-CUICATLÁN Fascículo 62. ASTERACEAE José Ángel Villarreal-Quintanilla* José Luis Villaseñor-Ríos** Rosalinda Medina-Lemos** *Departamento de Botánica Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro **Departamento de Botánica Instituto de Biología, UNAM INSTITUTO DE BIOLOGÍA UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO 2008 Primera edición: octubre de 2008 D.R. © Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Instituto de Biología. Departamento de Botánica ISBN 968-36-3108-8 Flora del Valle de Tehuacán-Cuicatlán ISBN 970-32-5084-4 Fascículo 62 Dirección de los autores: Departamento de Botánica Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro Buenavista, Saltillo C.P. 25315 Coahuila, México Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Instituto de Biología. Departamento de Botánica. 3er. Circuito de Ciudad Universitaria Coyoacán, 04510. México, D.F. 1 En la portada: 2 1. Mitrocereus fulviceps (cardón) 2. Beaucarnea purpusii (soyate) 3 4 3. Agave peacockii (maguey fibroso) 4. Agave stricta (gallinita) Dibujo de Elvia Esparza FLORA DEL VALLE DE TEHUACÁN-CUICATLÁN 62: 1-59. 2008 ASTERACEAE1 Bercht. & J.Presl Tribu Tageteae José Ángel Villarreal-Quintanilla José Luis Villaseñor-Ríos Rosalinda Medina-Lemos Bibliografía. Bremer, K. 1994. Asteraceae. Cladistics & Classification. Timber Press. Portland, Oregon. 752 p. McVaugh, R. 1984. Compositae. In: W.R. Anderson (ed.). Flora Novo-Galiciana. Ann Arbor The University of Michi- gan Press 12: 40-42. Panero, J.L. & V.A. Funk. 2002. Toward a phylogene- tic subfamily classification for the Compositae (Asteraceae). Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington 115: 909-922. Villaseñor Ríos, J.L. 1993. La familia Asteraceae en México. Rev. Soc. Mex. Hist. Nat. 44: 117-124. Villaseñor Ríos, J.L. 2003. Diversidad y distribución de las Magnoliophyta de México. -
Native and Adapted Plants for Central Texas
9/13/2016 Native and Adapted Plants for Central Texas Meredith O’Reilly 4-H CAPITAL Youth Gardening Specialist [email protected] Standing Cypress, Black-eyed Susan, Horsemint Class Topics Part I: The Basics A. Why Native and Adapted? Native plants (why important) Adapted plants (benefits, considerations) Other terms (cultivars, invasives) B. Eco-regions, Adaptations, and Wildlife Value of Native Texas Plants Part II: Getting to Know the Guide Part III: Plant Selections for Specific Garden Needs 1 9/13/2016 Why Native and Adapted? For the benefit of our Austin and Texas wildlife and landscape, it is helpful to select plants that: Are water-wise Are drought-tolerant Have wildlife value (esp. natives) Are naturally resistant to pests and diseases (esp. natives) Need less maintenance and fertilizing Also, higher survivability saves money! Bumblebee on Shrubby Boneset, or White Mistflower What is native? A native species is one that exists naturally in an eco-region without human introduction, direct or indirect. Native flora and fauna in an ecological community, having evolved together, are often interdependent. Autumn Sage (Cherry Sage), Datura, Blackfoot Daisy 2 9/13/2016 Why Are Native Plants Important? They protect Texas’ biodiversity They gain back natural ecosystems for our native flora and fauna wildlife interdependence They are specially adapted to handle Texas soil and weather They use less water and require less maintenance, fertilizing, and pest control They protect our watersheds They keep Texas beautiful! Adapted Plants Adapted plants are non-invasive, non-native plants that are able to thrive in the local climate and soil conditions. -
Echter's Nursery & Garden Center Flashing Light Maiden Pinks
5150 Garrison St. Echter's Nursery & Garden Center Arvada, CO, 80002 phone: 303-424-7979 [email protected] Flashing Light Maiden Pinks www.echters.com Flashing Light Maiden Pinks Dianthus deltoides 'Flashing Light' Plant Height: 6 inches Flower Height: 8 inches Spread: 18 inches Spacing: 14 inches Sunlight: Hardiness Zone: 2a Description: Vigorous and free flowering, this selection features lovely frilly crimson blooms with deep red center rings, spreading across a low growing mat of green foliage; drought tolerant and easy to grow, ideal for rock Flashing Light Maiden Pinks flowers gardens, borders or used as groundcover Photo courtesy of NetPS Plant Finder Ornamental Features Flashing Light Maiden Pinks has masses of beautiful fragrant crimson frilly flowers with a dark red ring at the ends of the stems from late spring to mid summer, which are most effective when planted in groupings. The flowers are excellent for cutting. Its attractive narrow leaves remain dark green in color throughout the year. The fruit is not ornamentally significant. Landscape Attributes Flashing Light Maiden Pinks is an herbaceous evergreen perennial with a mounded form. It brings an extremely fine and delicate texture to the garden composition and should be used to full effect. This plant will require occasional maintenance and upkeep, and is best cleaned up in early spring before it resumes active growth for the season. It is a good choice for attracting bees and butterflies to your yard, but is not particularly attractive to deer who tend to leave it alone in favor of tastier treats. Gardeners should be aware of the following characteristic(s) that may warrant special consideration; - Self-Seeding Flashing Light Maiden Pinks is recommended for the following landscape applications; - Mass Planting - Rock/Alpine Gardens - Border Edging - General Garden Use - Container Planting 5150 Garrison St. -
Educational Posters on Threatened Plant Communities of North Carolina
Submitted by Nicolette L. Cagle on June 26, 2012 Native Plant Studies Certificate Project: Educational Posters on Threatened Plant Communities of North Carolina Nonriverine Wet Hardwood Forest from the Coastal Plain, NC. [Photo by David Blevins, Ph.D.] Submitted by Nicolette L. Cagle on June 26, 2012 Table of Contents Background ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Description........................................................................................................................................ 3 Timeline......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Most Threatened Plant Communities in North Carolina .............................................................................. 4 Poster Display at the North Carolina Botanical Garden................................................................................ 5 Posters .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 6 Threatened Plant Communities ................................................................................................................ 7 Poster Project References -
Raport Stiintific Si Tehnic 2010.Pdf
MINISTERUL EDUCAŢIEI, CERCETĂRII, TINERETULUI ŞI SPORTULUI UNIVERSITATEA DE ŞTIINŢE AGRICOLE ŞI MEDICINĂ VETERINARĂ “ION IONESCU DE LA BRAD“ Aleea M. Sadoveanu nr. 3, 700490 – IAŞI, ROMÂNIA Tel. +40-232-213069/260650 Fax. +40-232-260650 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.uaiasi.ro PROGRAMUL 4: “Parteneriate în domeniile prioritare” Categoria de proiecte: PROIECTE COMPLEXE – PC Direcţia de cercetare: 5.1. Contract de finanţare nr. 52-174/2008 Contractor: UNIVERSITATEA DE ŞTIINŢE AGRICOLE ŞI MEDICINĂ VETERINARĂ “ION IONESCU DE LA BRAD” IAŞI Parteneri: P1 – Universitatea Bucureşti P2 – Universitatea “Al. I. Cuza” Iaşi P3 - Staţiunea de Cercetare-Dezvoltare pentru Legumicultură Bacău P4 – S.C. “PLASTPROD” SRL Iaşi RAPORTUL ŞTIINŢIFIC ŞI TEHNIC (RST) la proiectul “VALORIFICAREA BIODIVERSITĂŢII FLOREI SPONTANE DIN ROMÂNIA, ÎN SCOPUL ÎMBOGĂŢIRII SORTIMENTULUI DE PLANTE ORNAMENTALE” - BIODIVDECOR Etapa III/2010 Denumirea etapei: “Colectarea, stocarea, înmulţirea şi studiul taxonilor. Studiul materialelor biodegradabile” Director proiect: Prof. univ. dr. Lucia DRAGHIA PROGRAMUL 4 “PARTENERIATE IN DOMENIILE PRIORITARE” 2007-2013 CUPRINS I. Obiective generale …………………………………………………..…… 2 II. Obiectivele etapei de execuţie ............................................ 2 III. Rezumatul etapei ............................................................... 3 IV Rezultate obţinute (descrierea ştiinţifică şi tehnică ............. 5 4.1. Activitatea 1. Analiza activităţii din etapaII. Training. Elaborare plan de lucru etapa III ……………………………………………………. 5 -
Vascular Plants and a Brief History of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands
United States Department of Agriculture Vascular Plants and a Brief Forest Service Rocky Mountain History of the Kiowa and Rita Research Station General Technical Report Blanca National Grasslands RMRS-GTR-233 December 2009 Donald L. Hazlett, Michael H. Schiebout, and Paulette L. Ford Hazlett, Donald L.; Schiebout, Michael H.; and Ford, Paulette L. 2009. Vascular plants and a brief history of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS- GTR-233. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 44 p. Abstract Administered by the USDA Forest Service, the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands occupy 230,000 acres of public land extending from northeastern New Mexico into the panhandles of Oklahoma and Texas. A mosaic of topographic features including canyons, plateaus, rolling grasslands and outcrops supports a diverse flora. Eight hundred twenty six (826) species of vascular plant species representing 81 plant families are known to occur on or near these public lands. This report includes a history of the area; ethnobotanical information; an introductory overview of the area including its climate, geology, vegetation, habitats, fauna, and ecological history; and a plant survey and information about the rare, poisonous, and exotic species from the area. A vascular plant checklist of 816 vascular plant taxa in the appendix includes scientific and common names, habitat types, and general distribution data for each species. This list is based on extensive plant collections and available herbarium collections. Authors Donald L. Hazlett is an ethnobotanist, Director of New World Plants and People consulting, and a research associate at the Denver Botanic Gardens, Denver, CO. -
Effects of Invasive Plant Species on Native Bee Communities in the Southern Great Plains
EFFECTS OF INVASIVE PLANT SPECIES ON NATIVE BEE COMMUNITIES IN THE SOUTHERN GREAT PLAINS By KAITLIN M. O’BRIEN Bachelor of Science in Rangeland Ecology & Management Texas A&M University College Station, Texas 2015 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May, 2017 EFFECTS OF INVASIVE PLANT SPECIES ON NATIVE BEE COMMUNITIES IN THE SOUTHERN GREAT PLAINS Thesis Approved: Dr. Kristen A. Baum Thesis Adviser Dr. Karen R. Hickman Dr. Dwayne Elmore ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to begin by thanking my advisor, Dr. Kristen Baum, for all of her guidance and expertise throughout this research project. She is an exemplary person to work with, and I am so grateful to have shared my graduate school experience with her. I would also like to recognize my committee members, Dr. Karen Hickman and Dr. Dwayne Elmore, both of whom provided valuable insight to this project. A huge thank you goes out to the Southern Plains Network of the National Park Service, specifically Robert Bennetts and Tomye Folts-Zettner. Without them, this project would not exist, and I am forever grateful to have been involved with their network and parks, both as a research student and summer crew member. A special thank you for Jonathin Horsely, who helped with plot selection, summer sampling, and getting my gear around. I would also like to thank the Baum Lab members, always offering their support and guidance as we navigated through graduate school. And lastly, I would like to thank my family, especially my fiancé Garrett, for believing in me and supporting me as I pursued my goals. -
Fungi Associated with Aizoaceae Seed in the Succulent Karoo
Fungi associated with Aizoaceae seed in the Succulent Karoo Z. Pieterse1, T.A.S. Aveling1 and A. Jacobs2 1Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Forestry and Agriculture Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa and 2Plant Protection Research Institute - Biosystematics, Agriculture Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa. Abstract The Aizoaceae, commonly known as mesembs or “ice plants”, is a plant family endemic to Namaqualand, an area inside the Succulent Karoo biodiversity hotspot in South Africa. The more than 1800 unique mesembs are in part characterised by their hygrochastic seed capsules dispersing their seed by jet action. Six capsule types: Mesembryanthemum-type, Delosperma-type, Drosanthemum-type, Lampranthus-type, Ruschia-type and Leipoldtia-type are distinguished by differences in funicles, covering membranes and closing bodies. With the existence of microbial endemism now widely recognised, research into community ecology in the Succulent Karoo is needed to enable proper conservation. Sadly the microbial life associated with Aizoaceae has received little attention, Alternaria, Colletotrichum and Fusarium, have however been isolated from the halophyte Sesuvium portulacastrum, one of the few species from Aizoaceae but not endemic to South Africa. Fungi are known to aid in germination, seedling establishment, growth, water relations and nutrition in the Cactaceae (a family closely related to Aizoaceae). We believe that fungi may play a role in the ability of Aizoaceae to thrive in Namaqualand due to their specialization in the form of thick-walled spores that remain viable and have the ability to grow slow even at extreme aridity. We have isolated species of Alternaria, Aspergillus, Bipolaris, Cladosporium, Fusarium and Talaromyces from seeds of common mesemb species from Namaqualand.