DOCSLIB.ORG

Drinking Water Criteria Document for Brominated Trihalomethanes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Drinking Water Criteria Document for Brominated Trihalomethanes United States Office of Science and EPA-822-R-05-011 Environmental Technology November 15, 2005 Protection Agency Washington, D.C. EPA Office of Water DRINKING WATER CRITERIA DOCUMENT FOR BROMINATED TRIHALOMETHANES Prepared for Health and Ecological Criteria Division Office of Science and Technology Office of Water U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. 20460 under EPA Contract No. 68-C-02-206 Work assignment 3-16 by Syracuse Research Corporation 6225 Running Ridge Road North Syracuse, NY 13212 Under subcontract to The Cadmus Group, Inc. 135 Beaver Street Waltham, MA 02452 FOREWORD Section 1412 (b) (3) (A) of the Safe Drinking Water Act, as amended in 1986, requires the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to publish Maximum Contaminant Level Goals (MCLGs) and promulgate National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for each contaminant, which, in the judgment of the Administrator, may have an adverse effect on public health and which is known or anticipated to occur in public water systems. The MCLG is nonenforceable and is set at a level at which no known or anticipated adverse health effects in humans occur and which allows for an adequate margin of safety. Factors considered in setting the MCLG include health effects data and sources of exposure other than drinking water. This document provides the health effects basis to be considered in establishing the MCLGs for brominated trihalomethanes found in chlorinated drinking water. To achieve this objective, data on pharmacokinetics, human exposure, acute and chronic toxicity to animals and humans, epidemiology and mechanisms of toxicity were evaluated. Specific emphasis is placed on literature data providing dose-response information. Thus, while the literature search and evaluation performed in support of this document was comprehensive, only the reports considered most pertinent in the derivation of the MCLGs are cited in this document. The comprehensive literature search in support of this document includes information published up to January, 2005; however, more recent information may have been added during the review process. When adequate health effects data exist, Health Advisory values for less than lifetime exposure (One-day, Ten-day and Longer-term, approximately 10% of an individual's lifetime) are included in this document. These values are not used in setting the MCLGs, but serve as informal guidance to municipalities and other organizations when emergency spills or contamination situations occur. Ephraim King Director, Office of Science and Technology Office of Water Acknowledgments This document is derived and updated/expanded of the Draft for the Drinking Water Criteria Document on Trihalomethanes (U.S. EPA, 1994), Summary of New Health Effects Data on Drinking Water Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts (D/DBPs) for the Notice of Availability (NODA) (U.S.EPA, 1997), and Draft Drinking Water Criteria Document on Brominated Trihalomethanes (U.S. EPA, 2003). This document includes and evaluation of literature on brominated trihalomethanes resulting from full literature searches conducted up to January 2005 for toxicity data. In addition, few newer studies identified after the literature search date have been included as available at the time of document preparation. Contracting Officer Renita Tyus Cincinnati, OH, USEPA Project Officer Jane Holtorf Office of Water, USEPA Work Assignment Manager Nancy Chiu Office of Science and Technology, USEPA Authors Lori Moilinen, Ph.D., DABT Syracuse Research Corporation Nancy Chiu, Ph.D. Office of Science and Technology, USEPA Julie Stickney, Ph.D., DABT Syracuse Research Corporation Other Contractor Technical Support Frank Letkiewicz, B.S. The Cadmus Group, Inc. Karen Ferrante, M.S. The Cadmus Group Inc. Madhulika Nataraja, M.S.E The Cadmus Group Inc. Reviewers This document has been peer reviewed by both EPA scientists and by scientists external to EPA. Internal EPA Reviewers Bob Beliles, Ph.D. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research & Development, USEPA Jennifer Jinot, Ph.D. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research & Development, USEPA Bob Sonawane, Ph.D. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research & Development, USEPA External Peer Reviewers Hudy Buelke-Sam, M.A. Toxicology Services, Greenfield, Indiana Annette Loch Bunge, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado John Reif, M.Sc., D.V.M. Department Head, Department of Environmental Health, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado TABLE OF CONTENTS External Peer Reviewers ........................................................4 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................. I - 1 II. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES ............................ II - 1 A. Properties .................................................... II - 1 B. Summary .................................................... II - 2 III. TOXICOKINETICS ................................................. III - 1 A. Absorption ................................................... III - 1 B. Distribution .................................................. III - 3 C. Metabolism .................................................. III - 5 D. Excretion ................................................... III - 15 E. Bioaccumulation and Retention .................................. III - 15 F. Summary ................................................... III - 15 IV. HUMAN EXPOSURE................................................ IV - 1 A. Occurrence in Drinking Water .................................... IV - 1 1. National Surveys ........................................ IV - 2 2. Other Studies ........................................... IV - 8 3. Estimates of Tap Water Ingestion Exposure to Brominated Trihalomethanes........................................ IV - 13 B. Exposure from Sources Other Than Drinking Water ................. IV - 17 1. Dietary Intake ......................................... IV - 17 2. Air Intake ............................................. IV - 20 3. Concentrations and Exposures Associated with Swimming Pools and Hot Tubs ................................................. IV - 27 4. Soil Concentrations and Exposure .......................... IV - 30 C. Overall Exposure ............................................. IV - 30 D. Body Burden ................................................ IV - 31 1. Blood ................................................ IV - 31 2. Mother's Milk.......................................... IV - 35 E. Summary ................................................... IV - 35 V. HEALTH EFFECTS IN ANIMALS ..................................... V - 1 A. Acute Exposures .............................................. V - 1 1. Bromodichloromethane ................................... V - 1 2. Dibromochloromethane ................................... V - 6 3. Bromoform............................................. V - 7 B. Short-Term Exposures .......................................... V - 8 1. Bromodichloromethane .................................. V - 14 2. Dibromochloromethane .................................. V - 22 i 3. Bromoform............................................ V - 25 C. Subchronic Exposure .......................................... V - 28 1. Bromodichloromethane .................................. V - 31 2. Dibromochloromethane .................................. V - 33 3. Bromoform............................................ V - 34 D. Chronic Exposure ............................................ V - 35 1. Bromodichloromethane .................................. V - 37 2. Dibromochloromethane .................................. V - 41 3. Bromoform............................................ V - 42 E. Reproductive and Developmental Effects .......................... V - 43 1. Bromodichloromethane .................................. V - 43 2. Dibromochloromethane .................................. V - 59 3. Bromoform............................................ V - 62 F. Mutagenicity and Genotoxicity .................................. V - 70 1. Bromodichloromethane .................................. V - 70 2. Dibromochloromethane .................................. V - 78 3. Bromoform............................................ V - 84 G. Carcinogenicity .............................................. V - 90 1. Bromodichloromethane .................................. V - 90 2. Dibromochloromethane ................................. V - 101 3. Bromoform........................................... V - 104 H. Other Key Health Effects ...................................... V - 108 1. Immunotoxicity ....................................... V - 108 2. Hormonal Disruption ................................... V - 110 3. Structure-Activity Relationships .......................... V - 117 I. Summary .................................................. V - 118 1. Health Effects of Acute and Short Term Exposure of Animals . V - 118 2. Health Effects of Longer-term Exposure of Animals .......... V - 118 3. Reproductive and Developmental Effects ................... V - 119 4. Mutagenicity and Genotoxicity ........................... V - 120 5. Carcinogenicity and Related Studies in Animals ............. V - 120 6. Other Key effects ...................................... V - 121 VI. HEALTH EFFECTS IN HUMANS ............................... VI - 1 A. Clinical Case
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Disinfection Byproducts in Chlorinated Drinking Water
    International Journal of Water and Wastewater Treatment SciO p Forschene n HUB for Sc i e n t i f i c R e s e a r c h ISSN 2381-5299 | Open Access RESEARCH ARTICLE Volume 4 - Issue 2 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.16966/2381-5299.156 Disinfection Byproducts in Chlorinated Drinking Water Malia Vester1, Hany F Sobhi2 and Mintesinot Jiru1* 1Department of Natural Sciences, Coppin State University, Maryland, USA 2Center for Organic Synthesis, Department of Natural Sciences, Coppin State University, Maryland, USA *Corresponding author: Mintesinot Jiru, Department of Natural Sciences, Coppin State University, Maryland, USA, Tel: 410-951-4139; E-mail: [email protected] Received: 07 Jul, 2018 | Accepted: 14 Nov, 2018 | Published: 20 Nov, 2018 Citation: Vester M, Sobhi HF, Jiru M (2018) Disinfection Byproducts in Chlorinated Drinking Water. Int J Water Wastewater Treat 4(2): dx.doi. org/10.16966/2381-5299.156 Copyright: © Vester M, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract Trihalomethanes (THMs) are disinfection byproducts formed through the reaction of chlorine and organic matter. There are four forms of Trihalomethanes: chloroform, bromoform, dibromochloromethane and bromodichloromethane. Studies have shown that chloroform, a principal disinfection byproduct, is carcinogenic in rodents. Although the presence of these hazardous materials are constantly being monitored by Water Treatment Plant and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), they continue to be present at an unpredictable levels and the full effects of these byproducts are not fully understood.
    [Show full text]
  • A Van Der Waals Density Functional Study of Chloroform and Other Trihalomethanes on Graphene Joel Åkesson, Oskar Sundborg, Olof Wahlström, and Elsebeth Schröder
    A van der Waals density functional study of chloroform and other trihalomethanes on graphene Joel Åkesson, Oskar Sundborg, Olof Wahlström, and Elsebeth Schröder Citation: J. Chem. Phys. 137, 174702 (2012); doi: 10.1063/1.4764356 View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4764356 View Table of Contents: http://jcp.aip.org/resource/1/JCPSA6/v137/i17 Published by the American Institute of Physics. Additional information on J. Chem. Phys. Journal Homepage: http://jcp.aip.org/ Journal Information: http://jcp.aip.org/about/about_the_journal Top downloads: http://jcp.aip.org/features/most_downloaded Information for Authors: http://jcp.aip.org/authors THE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS 137, 174702 (2012) A van der Waals density functional study of chloroform and other trihalomethanes on graphene Joel Åkesson,1 Oskar Sundborg,1 Olof Wahlström,1 and Elsebeth Schröder2,a) 1Hulebäcksgymnasiet, Idrottsvägen 2, SE-435 80 Mölnlycke, Sweden 2Microtechnology and Nanoscience, MC2, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden (Received 25 July 2012; accepted 14 October 2012; published online 1 November 2012) A computational study of chloroform (CHCl3) and other trihalomethanes (THMs) adsorbed on graphene is presented. The study uses the van der Waals density functional method to obtain ad- sorption energies and adsorption structures for these molecules of environmental concern. In this study, chloroform is found to adsorb with the H atom pointing away from graphene, with adsorption energy 357 meV (34.4 kJ/mol). For the other THMs studied the calculated adsorption energy values vary from 206 meV (19.9 kJ/mol) for fluoroform (CHF3) to 404 meV (39.0 kJ/mol) for bromoform (CHBr3).
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis of Bromochloromethane Using Phase Transfer Catalysis
    1 SYNTHESIS OF BROMOCHLOROMETHANE USING PHASE TRANSFER CATALYSIS By LANCELOT LUCRETIUS BROOKS Baccalaureus Scientiae Honores-Chemistry, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University A dissertation submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the Masters Degree in Chemistry In the Faculty of Science at the NELSON MANDELA METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY Nov. 2011 Promoter : Dr G. Dugmore Co-Promoter : Prof B. Zeelie 2 DECLARATION I, Lancelot Brooks, hereby declare that the above-mentioned treatise is my own work and that it has not previously been submitted for assessment to another University, or for another qualification. ……………………………….. ……………………….. Mr. L.L. Brooks Date 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To my promoters Dr. Gary Dugmore, and Prof. Ben Zeelie for their invaluable input, help and guidance. To NRF and NMMU for financial assistance To my parents and brothers for their love and support To Peter, Batsho, Unati, and friends in NMMU chemistry research laboratory, thank you guys. To my dearest fiancée, Natasha, a very special thank you for always being there and supporting me. Love you angel. “And we know that all things work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose” -Romans 8:28. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION……………………………………………………………………. 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………………. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS………………………………………………………………. 4 LIST OF FIGURES…………………………………………………………………….. 8 LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………………………… 9 LIST OF EQUATIONS………………………………………………………………… 11 SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………………… 12 CHAPTER 1…………………………………………………………………………….. 14 INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………. 14 1.1. Technology of leather production……………………………………………….. 14 1.2. Synthesis of TCMTB……………………………………………………………… 17 1.3. Bromine……………………………………………………………………………. 20 1.3.1. Overview……………………………………………………………. 20 1.3.2. Applications of bromine compounds…………..…………………. 22 1.3.2.1. Photography……………………………………………… 22 1.3.2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Chlorofluorocarbons in Hydrology : a Guidebook
    USE OF CHLOROFLUOROCARBONS IN HYDROLOGY A Guidebook USE OF CHLOROFLUOROCARBONS IN HYDROLOGY A GUIDEBOOK 2005 Edition The following States are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency: AFGHANISTAN GREECE PANAMA ALBANIA GUATEMALA PARAGUAY ALGERIA HAITI PERU ANGOLA HOLY SEE PHILIPPINES ARGENTINA HONDURAS POLAND ARMENIA HUNGARY PORTUGAL AUSTRALIA ICELAND QATAR AUSTRIA INDIA REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AZERBAIJAN INDONESIA ROMANIA BANGLADESH IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION BELARUS IRAQ SAUDI ARABIA BELGIUM IRELAND SENEGAL BENIN ISRAEL SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO BOLIVIA ITALY SEYCHELLES BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA JAMAICA SIERRA LEONE BOTSWANA JAPAN BRAZIL JORDAN SINGAPORE BULGARIA KAZAKHSTAN SLOVAKIA BURKINA FASO KENYA SLOVENIA CAMEROON KOREA, REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA CANADA KUWAIT SPAIN CENTRAL AFRICAN KYRGYZSTAN SRI LANKA REPUBLIC LATVIA SUDAN CHAD LEBANON SWEDEN CHILE LIBERIA SWITZERLAND CHINA LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC COLOMBIA LIECHTENSTEIN TAJIKISTAN COSTA RICA LITHUANIA THAILAND CÔTE D’IVOIRE LUXEMBOURG THE FORMER YUGOSLAV CROATIA MADAGASCAR REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA CUBA MALAYSIA TUNISIA CYPRUS MALI TURKEY CZECH REPUBLIC MALTA UGANDA DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC MARSHALL ISLANDS UKRAINE OF THE CONGO MAURITANIA UNITED ARAB EMIRATES DENMARK MAURITIUS UNITED KINGDOM OF DOMINICAN REPUBLIC MEXICO GREAT BRITAIN AND ECUADOR MONACO NORTHERN IRELAND EGYPT MONGOLIA UNITED REPUBLIC EL SALVADOR MOROCCO ERITREA MYANMAR OF TANZANIA ESTONIA NAMIBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ETHIOPIA NETHERLANDS URUGUAY FINLAND NEW ZEALAND UZBEKISTAN FRANCE NICARAGUA VENEZUELA GABON NIGER VIETNAM GEORGIA NIGERIA YEMEN GERMANY NORWAY ZAMBIA GHANA PAKISTAN ZIMBABWE The Agency’s Statute was approved on 23 October 1956 by the Conference on the Statute of the IAEA held at United Nations Headquarters, New York; it entered into force on 29 July 1957. The Headquarters of the Agency are situated in Vienna.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicological Profile for Bromodichloromethane
    BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 89 CHAPTER 5. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE 5.1 OVERVIEW Bromodichloromethane has been identified in at least 238 of the 1,854 hazardous waste sites that have been proposed for inclusion on the EPA National Priorities List (NPL) (ATSDR 2017). However, the number of sites in which bromodichloromethane has been evaluated is not known. The number of sites in each state is shown in Figure 5-1. Of these sites, 233 are located within the United States, 2 are located in the Virgin Islands, and 3 are located in Puerto Rico (not shown). Figure 5-1. Number of NPL Sites with Bromodichloromethane Contamination • The most likely route of exposure for the general public to bromodichloromethane is through ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact of chlorinated drinking water. • A median bromodichloromethane intake of 2.8–4.2 µg/day from drinking water has been estimated; inhalation and dermal exposure would add to this daily intake. BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 90 5. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE • Bromodichloromethane is formed as a byproduct of water disinfection methods using chlorination. This is the primary source of bromodichloromethane in the environment. • Its principal use is as a chemical intermediate for organic synthesis and as a chemical reagent. • Volatilization is an important fate process. Bromodichloromethane evaporates from sources and enters the environment as a gas, which is slowly broken down in air. Residual bromodichloromethane may be broken down slowly by bacteria. • In the atmosphere, bromodichloromethane is thought to undergo slow degradation through oxidative pathways, with a half-life of about 2–3 months. 5.2 PRODUCTION, IMPORT/EXPORT, USE, AND DISPOSAL 5.2.1 Production The principal anthropogenic source of bromodichloromethane is its unintentional formation as a byproduct during the chlorination of water containing organic materials and bromide.
    [Show full text]
  • (19) United States (12) Reissued Patent (10) Patent Number: US RE42,889 E Vazquez Et Al
    USOORE42889E (19) United States (12) Reissued Patent (10) Patent Number: US RE42,889 E Vazquez et al. (45) Date of Reissued Patent: Nov. 1, 2011 (54) O- AND B-AMINO ACID 5,140,011 A 8, 1992 Branca et al. HYDROXYETHYLAMNO SULFONAMIDES 5,194,608 A 3/1993 Toyoda et al. 5,215,967 A 6/1993 Gante et al. USEFUL AS RETROVIRAL PROTEASE 5,223,615 A 6/1993 Toyoda et al. INHIBITORS 5,272,268 A 12/1993 Toyoda et al. 5,278,148 A 1/1994 Branca et al. 5,463,104 A 10/1995 Vazquez et al. (75) Inventors: Michael L. Vazquez, Gurnee, IL (US); 5,475,013 A 12/1995 Talley et al. Richard A. Mueller, Glencoe, IL (US); 5,514,801 A 5/1996 Bertenshaw et al. John J. Talley, St. Louis, MO (US); 5,521,219 A 5/1996 Vazquez et al. Daniel P. Getman, Chesterfield, MO 5,532,215 A 7/1996 Lezdey et al. 5,541,206 A 7/1996 Kempfet al. (US); Gary A. DeCrescenzo, St. Peters, 5,552,558 A 9/1996 Kempfet al. MO (US); John N. Freskos, Clayton, 5,585.397 A * 12/1996 Tung et al. .................... 514,473 MO (US); Robert M. Heintz, Ballwin, H1649 H 5/1997 Barrish et al. MO (US); Deborah E. Bertenshaw, 5,674,882 A 10/1997 Kempfet al. 5,691,372 A 1 1/1997 Tung et al. Brentwood, MO (US) 5,723,490 A 3/1998 Tung 5,744,481 A 4/1998 Vazquez et al. (73) Assignee: G.D.
    [Show full text]
  • An Automated Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography- Mass Spectrometry System for the Sensitive Shipboard Analysis of Volatile Organi
    J. Sep. Sci. 2001, 24, 97–103 Hashimoto, Tanaka, Yamashita, Maeda97 Shinya Hashimotoa), An automated purge and trap gas chromatography- Toshiyuki Tanakab), mass spectrometry system for the sensitive Nobuyoshi Yamashitab), Tsuneaki Maedac) shipboard analysis of volatile organic compounds in seawater a) Department of Ocean Sciences, Tokyo University of We developed an automated purge and trap unit connected to a gas chromatograph- Fisheries, 4-5-7 Konan, Minato- mass spectrometer for shipboard determination of unstable volatile organic com- ku, Tokyo 108±8477, Japan pounds in seawater. The device used a small column for the rapid desorption of ad- b) National Institute for sorbed compounds, thus eliminating the need for post-desorption cryofocusing. The Resources and Environment, a 16-3 Onogawa, Tsukuba, repeatability (relative standard deviation, RSD; n = 7) was typically 5%. The detection Ibaraki 305±8569, Japan limits were 0.1–4.3 pM for chloromethane, bromomethane, dichloromethane, iodo- c) DKK Corporation, 4-13-14 methane, dimethyl sulfide, iodoethane, isoprene, bromochloromethane, chloroform, Kichijoji Kitamachi, Musashino- tetrachloromethane, dibromomethane, bromodichloromethane, iodopropane, chlor- shi, Tokyo 108-0001, Japan oiodomethane, dimethyl disulfide, dibromochloromethane, bromoform, and diiodo- methane. To investigate the stability of seawater samples, we obtained a concentra- tion-time profile of volatile organic compounds using this method during the incubation of a seawater sample with and without the addition of HgCl2 in the dark at 48C. We found shipboard determination to be suitable and essential for the determination of un- stable compounds such as dimethyl sulfide in seawater, as the concentration of di- methyl sulfide increased considerably during the incubation of a seawater sample both with and without the addition of HgCl2.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Analytical Methods for Detecting Unknown Chemicals in Recycled Water
    PROJECT NO. 4992 Evaluating Analytical Methods for Detecting Unknown Chemicals in Recycled Water Evaluating Analytical Methods for Detecting Unknown Chemicals in Recycled Water Prepared by: Keith A. Maruya Charles S. Wong Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority 2020 The Water Research Foundation (WRF) is a nonprofit (501c3) organization which provides a unified source for One Water research and a strong presence in relationships with partner organizations, government and regulatory agencies, and Congress. The foundation conducts research in all areas of drinking water, wastewater, stormwater, and water reuse. The Water Research Foundation’s research portfolio is valued at over $700 million. The Foundation plays an important role in the translation and dissemination of applied research, technology demonstration, and education, through creation of research‐based educational tools and technology exchange opportunities. WRF serves as a leader and model for collaboration across the water industry and its materials are used to inform policymakers and the public on the science, economic value, and environmental benefits of using and recovering resources found in water, as well as the feasibility of implementing new technologies. For more information, contact: The Water Research Foundation Alexandria, VA Office Denver, CO Office 1199 North Fairfax Street, Suite 900 6666 West Quincy Avenue Alexandria, VA 22314‐1445 Denver, Colorado 80235‐3098 Tel: 571.384.2100 Tel: 303.347.6100 www.waterrf.org [email protected] ©Copyright 2020 by The Water Research Foundation. All rights reserved. Permission to copy must be obtained from The Water Research Foundation. WRF ISBN: 978‐1‐60573‐503‐0 WRF Project Number: 4992 This report was prepared by the organization(s) named below as an account of work sponsored by The Water Research Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • PBPK) Modeling of Metabolic Pathways of Bromochloromethane in Rats
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by PubMed Central Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Toxicology Volume 2012, Article ID 629781, 14 pages doi:10.1155/2012/629781 Research Article Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling of Metabolic Pathways of Bromochloromethane in Rats W. S. Cuello, 1 T. A. T. Janes, 1 J. M. Jessee,1 M. A. Venecek,1 M. E. Sawyer,2 C. R. Eklund,3 andM.V.Evans3 1 Research Experience for Undergraduate participant, Department of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA 2 Department of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA 3 National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA Correspondence should be addressed to M. V. Evans, [email protected] Received 18 January 2012; Revised 27 March 2012; Accepted 30 March 2012 Academic Editor: Kannan Krishnan Copyright © 2012 W. S. Cuello et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Bromochloromethane (BCM) is a volatile compound and a by-product of disinfection of water by chlorination. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models are used in risk assessment applications. An updated PBPK model for BCM is generated and applied to hypotheses testing calibrated using vapor uptake data. The two different metabolic hypotheses examined are (1) a two-pathway model using both CYP2E1 and glutathione transferase enzymes and (2) a two-binding site model where metabolism can occur on one enzyme, CYP2E1.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Trihalomethane Concentrations by Using Chloramines As a Disinfectant
    REDUCING TRIHALOMETHANE CONCENTRATIONS BY USING CHLORAMINES AS A DISINFECTANT by Elizabeth Anne Farren A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Environmental Engineering by ___________________________________ April 2003 APPROVED: ___________________________________ Dr. Jeanine D. Plummer, Major Advisor ____________________________________ Dr. Frederick L. Hart, Head of Department Abstract Disinfectants such as chlorine are used in drinking water treatment to protect the public health from pathogenic microorganisms. However, disinfectants also react with humic material present in raw water sources and produce by-products, such as trihalomethanes. Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) include four compounds: chloroform, bromodichloromethane, dibromochloromethane and bromoform. TTHMs are carcinogenic and have been found to cause adverse pregnancy outcomes. Therefore, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) has set the maximum contaminant limit for TTHMs at 80 µg/L. Additional regulations require reliable drinking water disinfection for resistant pathogens and treatment plants must simultaneously control TTHMs and achieve proper disinfection. Research has shown that THM formation depends on several factors. THM concentrations increase with increasing residence time, increased temperature and increased pH. The disinfectant type and concentration is also significant: THM concentrations can be minimized by using lower disinfectant doses or alternative disinfectants to chlorine such as chloramines. Chloramines are formed by the addition of both chlorine and ammonia. The Worcester Water Filtration Plant in Holden, MA currently uses both ozone and chlorine for primary disinfection. Chlorine is also used for secondary disinfection. This study analyzed the effect of using chloramines versus free chlorine on TTHM production at the plant.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Drinking Water Quality Report 1
    2015 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report 1 Quality • Value • Reliability • Customer Service 2015 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report 2 2015 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report TABLE OF CONTENTS A Message from the Director 2 Our Water Supply 3 A Message from the Director Our Water Treatment Process 4 Diversifying Our Water Supply 5 I am very pleased to share with you the 2015 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report WHY is Pure Water San Diego Being Implemented 5 that shows the high quality of your drinking water. WHAT is Pure Water San Diego 5 In fact, San Diego Public Utilities department is working to ensure that all our HOW does Pure Water Program Work 5 customers have safe, reliable and high-quality water for years to come. That’s why we WHERE is the Pure Water Program 6 are implementing the Pure Water program which will deliver 30 million gallons per WHEN will the New Facility be Built 6 day by 2021 and a total of 1/3 of our City’s drinking water supply by 2035. WHAT are The Steps 6 Follow Us 6 I want to thank you for your efforts to help the City reduce water usage and meet the Recycled Water Program 7 State mandated water use reductions in 2015. We at the Public Utilities department Groundwater 7 are committed to the efficient use of the water that we deliver. Rainwater Harvesting 7 The City is investing in the infrastructure that delivers your water. Many miles of cast Ocean Desalination 7 iron pipe were installed early in the 20th Century and are past their recommended Emergency Storage Project 8 service life - increasing the risk of main breaks and water loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Processes Affecting the Trihalomethane Concentrations
    Processes Affecting the Trihalomethane Concentrations Associated with the Third Injection, Storage, and Recovery Test at Lancaster, Antelope Valley, California, March 1998 through April 1999 U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4062 Prepared in cooperation with the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works and the Antelope Valley-East Kern Water Agency Processes Affecting the Trihalomethane Concentrations Associated with the Third Injection, Storage, and Recovery Test at Lancaster, Antelope Valley, California, March 1998 through April 1999 By Miranda S. Fram1, Brian A. Bergamaschi1, Kelly D. Goodwin2, Roger Fujii1, and Jordan F. Clark3 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4062 Prepared in cooperation with the LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS and the ANTELOPE VALLEY–EAST KERN WATER AGENCY 7212-58 1U.S. Geological Survey, Placer Hall, 6000 J Street, Sacramento, California 95819-6129 2Cooperative Institute of Marine and Atmospheric Chemistry 4301 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, Florida 33149 3University of California, Santa Barbara, Department of Geological Sciences Webb Hall, Santa Barbara, California 92106 Sacramento, California 2003 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey Placer Hall–
    [Show full text]