Alzheimer Europe Annual Report 2011

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alzheimer Europe Annual Report 2011 Dementia in Europe Yearbook 2012 National Dementia Strategies (diagnosis, treatment and research) Including the Alzheimer Europe Annual Report 2011 The Dementia in Europe Yearbook arises from the 2012 Work Plan of Alzhei- mer Europe, which has received funding from the European Union, in the framework of the Health Programme. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on its behalf is responsible for any use that might be made of the following information. Alzheimer Europe gratefully acknowledges the support it has received from the Alzheimer Europe Foundation for the publication of this Yearbook. 3 Table of contents Foreword ______________________________________________________________ 6 National Reports ________________________________________________________ 8 1 Austria _________________________________________________________ 9 2 Belgium _______________________________________________________ 11 3 Bulgaria _______________________________________________________ 13 4 Croatia ________________________________________________________ 17 5 Cyprus ________________________________________________________ 20 6 Czech Republic __________________________________________________ 22 7 Denmark ______________________________________________________ 26 8 Estonia _______________________________________________________ 31 9 Finland _______________________________________________________ 32 10 France ________________________________________________________ 36 11 Germany ______________________________________________________ 43 12 Greece ________________________________________________________ 46 13 Hungary ______________________________________________________ 49 14 Ireland ________________________________________________________ 51 15 Italy __________________________________________________________ 54 16 Jersey _________________________________________________________ 57 17 Latvia _________________________________________________________ 61 18 Lithuania _____________________________________________________ 62 19 Luxembourg ___________________________________________________ 63 20 Malta ________________________________________________________ 65 21 Netherlands ___________________________________________________ 70 22 Norway _______________________________________________________ 76 23 Poland ________________________________________________________ 81 24 Portugal _______________________________________________________ 85 25 Romania ______________________________________________________ 88 26 Slovakia _______________________________________________________ 91 27 Slovenia _______________________________________________________ 92 28 Spain _________________________________________________________ 95 29 Sweden _______________________________________________________ 97 30 Switzerland ___________________________________________________ 103 31 Turkey _______________________________________________________ 106 32 United Kingdom (England) _______________________________________ 109 33 United Kingdom (Northern Ireland) _________________________________ 119 34 United Kingdom (Scotland) _______________________________________ 125 35 United Kingdom (Wales) _________________________________________ 134 Acknowledgements ___________________________________________________ 136 5 Foreword Foreword It gives me great pleasure to present this report on the development of national dementia strategies in Europe. The report contains information on the situa- tion in 32 countries regarding the development of national dementia strategies focusing on three main topics, namely diagnosis, treatment and research. Of course, not all countries have such strategies as they are at different stages of development in relation to responding to the challenge that dementia poses. National dementia plans all aim to address dementia but do so in different ways. We have decided to focus on the three above-mentioned topics in this report and in our next report to address more care-related issues such as the provision of care, the training of healthcare professionals and social care staff, support at home, in the community and in nursing homes, as well as issues linked to perceptions of dementia and dementia-friendly societies. However, all countries have citizens with dementia who require timely diagnosis, treat- ment and support. This is essential to their quality of life and may help prevent prema- ture entry into long-term residential care. It also represents a moral duty of each society towards people with dementia based on solidarity, beneficence, dignity and equity. Even countries which lack a national dementia strategy may have a system in place to diagnose dementia and organise treatment. Many are also involved in research at European level and/or fund research in their own country. Those countries which do have a strategy often have a timeframe within which to accomplish the goals they have set. Consequently, for each country, provisions relating to a national dementia strategy are described, followed by details of progress with their implementation. Wherever possible, details of how diag- nosis, treatment and research are currently addressed at national level are provided. It is hoped that this information will enable readers to compare how different countries have addressed these common issues and perhaps learn from the different solutions which have been attempted. As some countries are further along the process than oth- ers and have monitored their own progress, it is possible to benefit from their experi- ence of success and of the obstacles they may have encountered along the way. Most, however, are in the early stages and many do not yet have a national dementia strategy. Most of the reports were written by or with the assistance of Alzheimer Europe’s member associations to whom we are immensely grateful. Some external experts also helped compile the reports. The names of all those who made it possible to produce this report are acknowledged at the end of each country report. It is encouraging to see how far some countries have come in developing national strate- gies and how others are well on the way to doing so. Alzheimer Europe is closely moni- toring this development and would be pleased to receive your comments and further information about developments within Europe. Jean Georges Executive Director Alzheimer Europe 7 National Reports National Reports 1 Austria 1 Austria 1.1 Background information about the National Dementia Strategy There is as yet no national dementia strategy in Austria. 1.2 Diagnosis, treatment and research 1.2.1 Issues relating to diagnosis This is not addressed at national level. 1.2.1.1 Which healthcare professionals are responsible for diagnosing dementia GPs are permitted to diagnose dementia and/or Alzheimer’s disease and they do. The diagnosis can also be made by a specialist doctor (i.e. a neurologist, psychiatrist or geri- atrician). GPs do not have set consultations times and there are no incentives to encour- age timely diagnosis. They do not, for example, receive additional payment for special examinations to diagnose Alzheimer’s disease. 1.2.1.2 Type and degree of training of GPs in dementia GPs do not receive special training in dementia during their professional training to become a GP and continuing education is voluntary. 1.2.1.3 Required tests to diagnose dementia There are no official guidelines, recommendations or tests which must be used in order to diagnose dementia and/or Alzheimer’s disease. The MMSE and clock drawing tests are most commonly used. 1.2.2 Issues related to medical treatment 1.2.2.1 The availability of medicines in general Austria keeps a list of pharmaceutical products for which expenses are covered by the healthcare system. Nevertheless, patients and carers need to cover part of the costs of medicines. This charge is currently set at EUR 5.15 per item prescribed. For infectious diseases and in cases of need, medicines may be free of charge. 1 1.2.2.2 The availability of Alzheimer treatments All four AD drugs are available in Austria and are included on the list of pharmaceutical products that are covered by the healthcare system. 1.2.2.3 Conditions surrounding the prescription and reimbursement of AD drugs Prescription is limited to specialist doctors and this applies to treatment initiation, as well as to continuing treatment decisions although continued treatment would be refunded 1 European Commission (2012): MISSOC – Mutual information system on social protection: Social protection in the Member States of the European Union, of the European Economic Area and in Switzerland: Comparative tables 9 for six months if prescribed by a GP. For the prescription of acetylcholinesterase inhibi- tors, an MMSE is required. Treatment with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors is limited to people with an MMSE between 26 and 10, whereas treatment with memantine is reim- bursed for patients scoring between 14 and 3 on this scale. Medicines for people living alone and for people in nursing homes are also covered by the healthcare system. However, in the case of people with dementia living alone, there must be a carer who can ensure that the person with dementia takes the medication. Bi-therapy with an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor and memantine is officially excluded from reimbursement in Austria, which means that patients would have to pay for one of the drugs except in well-founded cases (www.erstattungskodex.at). Prescription and Donepezil Rivastigmine Galantamine Memantine reimbursement Available
Recommended publications
  • ICD-10-CM Expert for SNF, IRF, and LTCH the Complete Official Code Set Codes Valid from October 1, 2018 Through September 30, 2019
    EXPERT 2019 ICD-10-CM Expert for SNF, IRF, and LTCH The complete official code set Codes valid from October 1, 2018 through September 30, 2019 Power up your coding optum360coding.com ITSN_ITSN19_CVR.indd 1 12/4/17 2:54 PM Contents Preface ................................................................................ iii ICD-10-CM Index to Diseases and Injuries .......................... 1 ICD-10-CM Official Preface ........................................................................iii Characteristics of ICD-10-CM ....................................................................iii ICD-10-CM Neoplasm Table ............................................ 331 What’s New for 2019 .......................................................... iv ICD-10-CM Table of Drugs and Chemicals ...................... 349 Official Updates ............................................................................................iv Proprietary Updates ...................................................................................vii ICD-10-CM Index to External Causes ............................... 397 Introduction ....................................................................... ix ICD-10-CM Tabular List of Diseases and Injuries ............ 433 History of ICD-10-CM .................................................................................ix Chapter 1. Certain Infectious and Parasitic Diseases (A00-B99) .........................................................................433 How to Use ICD-10-CM Expert for Skilled Nursing Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • ICD-10-CM TABULAR LIST of DISEASES and INJURIES 2018 Addenda No Change Chapter 1 No Change Certain Infectious and Parasitic Diseases (A00-B99)
    ICD-10-CM TABULAR LIST of DISEASES and INJURIES 2018 Addenda No Change Chapter 1 No Change Certain infectious and parasitic diseases (A00-B99) No Change Intestinal infectious diseases (A00-A09) No Change A04 Other bacterial intestinal infections No Change A04.7 Enterocolitis due to Clostridium difficile Add A04.71 Enterocolitis due to Clostridium difficile, recurrent Add A04.72 Enterocolitis due to Clostridium difficile, not specified as recurrent No Change A05 Other bacterial foodborne intoxications, not elsewhere classified No Change Excludes1: Revise from Clostridium difficile foodborne intoxication and infection (A04.7) Revise to Clostridium difficile foodborne intoxication and infection (A04.7-) No Change Helminthiases (B65-B83) No Change B81 Other intestinal helminthiases, not elsewhere classified No Change Excludes1: Revise from angiostrongyliasis due to Parastrongylus cantonensis (B83.2) Revise to angiostrongyliasis due to: Add Angiostrongylus cantonensis (B83.2) Add Parastrongylus cantonensis (B83.2) No Change B81.3 Intestinal angiostrongyliasis Revise from Angiostrongyliasis due to Parastrongylus costaricensis Revise to Angiostrongyliasis due to: Add Angiostrongylus costaricensis Add Parastrongylus costaricensis No Change Chapter 2 No Change Neoplasms (C00-D49) No Change Malignant neoplasms of ill-defined, other secondary and unspecified sites (C76-C80) No Change C79 Secondary malignant neoplasm of other and unspecified sites Delete Excludes2: lymph node metastases (C77.0) No Change C79.1 Secondary malignant neoplasm of bladder
    [Show full text]
  • European Conference on Rare Diseases
    EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON RARE DISEASES Luxembourg 21-22 June 2005 EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON RARE DISEASES Copyright 2005 © Eurordis For more information: www.eurordis.org Webcast of the conference and abstracts: www.rare-luxembourg2005.org TABLE OF CONTENT_3 ------------------------------------------------- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND CREDITS A specialised clinic for Rare Diseases : the RD TABLE OF CONTENTS Outpatient’s Clinic (RDOC) in Italy …………… 48 ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- 4 / RARE, BUT EXISTING The organisers particularly wish to thank ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND CREDITS 4.1 No code, no name, no existence …………… 49 ------------------------------------------------- the following persons/organisations/companies 4.2 Why do we need to code rare diseases? … 50 PROGRAMME COMMITTEE for their role : ------------------------------------------------- Members of the Programme Committee ……… 6 5 / RESEARCH AND CARE Conference Programme …………………………… 7 …… HER ROYAL HIGHNESS THE GRAND DUCHESS OF LUXEMBOURG Key features of the conference …………………… 12 5.1 Research for Rare Diseases in the EU 54 • Participants ……………………………………… 12 5.2 Fighting the fragmentation of research …… 55 A multi-disciplinary approach ………………… 55 THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION Funding of the conference ……………………… 14 Transfer of academic research towards • ------------------------------------------------- industrial development ………………………… 60 THE GOVERNEMENT OF LUXEMBOURG Speakers ……………………………………………… 16 Strengthening cooperation between academia
    [Show full text]
  • Distal Myopathies a Review: Highlights on Distal Myopathies with Rimmed Vacuoles
    Review Article Distal myopathies a review: Highlights on distal myopathies with rimmed vacuoles May Christine V. Malicdan, Ikuya Nonaka Department of Neuromuscular Research, National Institutes of Neurosciences, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan Distal myopathies are a group of heterogeneous disorders Since the discovery of the gene loci for a number classiÞ ed into one broad category due to the presentation of distal myopathies, several diseases previously of weakness involving the distal skeletal muscles. The categorized as different disorders have now proven to recent years have witnessed increasing efforts to identify be the same or allelic disorders (e.g. distal myopathy the causative genes for distal myopathies. The identiÞ cation with rimmed vacuoles and hereditary inclusion body of few causative genes made the broad classiÞ cation of myopathy, Miyoshi myopathy and limb-girdle muscular these diseases under “distal myopathies” disputable and dystrophy type 2B (LGMD 2B). added some enigma to why distal muscles are preferentially This review will focus on the most commonly affected. Nevertheless, with the clariÞ cation of the molecular known and distinct distal myopathies, using a simple basis of speciÞ c conditions, additional clues have been classification: distal myopathies with known molecular uncovered to understand the mechanism of each condition. defects [Table 1] and distal myopathies with unknown This review will give a synopsis of the common distal causative genes [Table 2]. The identification of the myopathies, presenting salient facts regarding the clinical, genes involved in distal myopathies has broadened pathological, and molecular aspects of each disease. Distal this classification into sub-categories as to the location myopathy with rimmed vacuoles, or Nonaka myopathy, will of encoded proteins: sarcomere (titin, myosin); plasma be discussed in more detail.
    [Show full text]
  • National System for Recording and Notification of Occupational Diseases Practical Guide
    InternationalInternational LabourLabour OfficeOffice GenevaGeneva National System for Recording and Notification of Occupational Diseases Practical guide Programme on Safety and Health at Work and the Environment (SafeWork) International Labour Organization Route des Morillons 4 CH -1211 Geneva 22 Switzerland TEL. + 41 22 7996715 FAX + 41 22 7996878 E-mail : safework @ ilo.org www.ilo.org / safework ILO National System for Recording and Notification of Occupational Diseases – Practical guide ISBN 978-92-2-127057-7 9 789221 270577 Programme on Safety and Health at Work and the Environment (SafeWork) National System for Recording and Notification of Occupational Diseases Practical guide International Labour Office, Geneva Copyright © International Labour Organization 2013 First published 2013 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Never- theless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to ILO Publications (Rights and Permissions), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: [email protected]. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with reproduction rights organizations may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulations for Disease Reporting and Control
    Department of Health Regulations for Disease Reporting and Control Commonwealth of Virginia State Board of Health October 2016 Virginia Department of Health Office of Epidemiology 109 Governor Street P.O. Box 2448 Richmond, VA 23218 Department of Health Department of Health TABLE OF CONTENTS Part I. DEFINITIONS ......................................................................................................................... 1 12 VAC 5-90-10. Definitions ............................................................................................. 1 Part II. GENERAL INFORMATION ............................................................................................... 8 12 VAC 5-90-20. Authority ............................................................................................... 8 12 VAC 5-90-30. Purpose .................................................................................................. 8 12 VAC 5-90-40. Administration ....................................................................................... 8 12 VAC 5-90-70. Powers and Procedures of Chapter Not Exclusive ................................ 9 Part III. REPORTING OF DISEASE ............................................................................................. 10 12 VAC 5-90-80. Reportable Disease List ....................................................................... 10 A. Reportable disease list ......................................................................................... 10 B. Conditions reportable by directors of
    [Show full text]
  • A Retrospective, Epidemiological Review of Hemiplegic Migraines in a Military Population
    MILITARY MEDICINE, 00, 0/0:1, 2019 A Retrospective, Epidemiological Review of Hemiplegic Migraines in a Military Population Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/milmed/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/milmed/usz040/5382215 by AMSUS Member Access user on 22 April 2019 CPT Brian A. Moore, USAR*†; Willie J. Hale*; Paul S. Nabity†; CAPT Tyler R. Koehn, MC, USAF‡; Donald McGeary†; Lt Col Alan L. Peterson, BSC USAF (Ret.)*†§ ABSTRACT Introduction: Headaches are one of the world’s most common disabling conditions. They are also both highly prevalent and debilitating among military personnel and can have a significant impact on fitness for duty. Hemiplegic migraines are an uncommon, yet severely incapacitating, subtype of migraine with aura for which there has been a significant increase amongst US military personnel over the past decade. To date, there has not been a scientific report on hemiplegic migraine in United States military personnel. Materials and Methods: The aim of this study was to provide an overview of hemiplegic migraine, to analyze data on the incidence of hemiplegic migraine in US military service members, and to evaluate demographic factors associated with hemiplegic migraine diagnoses. First time diagnoses of hemiplegic migraine were extracted from the Defense Medical Epidemiological Database according to ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for hemiplegic migraine. One sample Chi-Square goodness of fit tests were conducted on weighted demographic samples to determine whether significant proportional differences existed between gender, age, military grade, service component, race, and marital status. Results: From 1997 to 2007 there were no cases of hemiplegic migraine recorded in the Defense Medical Epidemiological Database.
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES (Revised 2010)
    LIST OF OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES (revised 2010) Identification and recognition of occupational diseases: Criteria for incorporating diseases in the ILO list of occupational diseases Occupational Safety and Health Series, No. 74 List of occupational diseases (revised 2010) Identification and recognition of occupational diseases: Criteria for incorporating diseases in the ILO list of occupational diseases INTERNATIONAL LABOUR OFFICE • GENEVA Copyright © International Labour Organization 2010 First published 2010 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to ILO Publications (Rights and Permissions), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: pubdroit@ ilo.org. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with reproduction rights organizations may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. ILO List of occupational diseases (revised 2010). Identification and recognition of occupational diseases: Criteria for incorporating diseases in the ILO list of occupational diseases Geneva, International Labour Office, 2010 (Occupational Safety and Health Series, No. 74) occupational disease / definition. 13.04.3 ISBN 978-92-2-123795-2 ISSN 0078-3129 Also available in French: Liste des maladies professionnelles (révisée en 2010): Identification et reconnaissance des maladies professionnelles: critères pour incorporer des maladies dans la liste des maladies professionnelles de l’OIT (ISBN 978-92-2-223795-1, ISSN 0250-412x), Geneva, 2010, and in Spanish: Lista de enfermedades profesionales (revisada en 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • ICD-10 International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems
    ICD-10 International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision Volume 2 Instruction manual 2010 Edition WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. - 10th revision, edition 2010. 3 v. Contents: v. 1. Tabular list – v. 2. Instruction manual – v. 3. Alphabetical index. 1.Diseases - classification. 2.Classification. 3.Manuals. I.World Health Organization. II.ICD-10. ISBN 978 92 4 154834 2 (NLM classification: WB 15) © World Health Organization 2011 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization are available on the WHO web site (www.who.int) or can be purchased from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press through the WHO web site (http://www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • FAQ REGARDING DISEASE REPORTING in MONTANA | Rev
    Disease Reporting in Montana: Frequently Asked Questions Title 50 Section 1-202 of the Montana Code Annotated (MCA) outlines the general powers and duties of the Montana Department of Public Health & Human Services (DPHHS). The three primary duties that serve as the foundation for disease reporting in Montana state that DPHHS shall: • Study conditions affecting the citizens of the state by making use of birth, death, and sickness records; • Make investigations, disseminate information, and make recommendations for control of diseases and improvement of public health to persons, groups, or the public; and • Adopt and enforce rules regarding the reporting and control of communicable diseases. In order to meet these obligations, DPHHS works closely with local health jurisdictions to collect and analyze disease reports. Although anyone may report a case of communicable disease, such reports are submitted primarily by health care providers and laboratories. The Administrative Rules of Montana (ARM), Title 37, Chapter 114, Communicable Disease Control, outline the rules for communicable disease control, including disease reporting. Communicable disease surveillance is defined as the ongoing collection, analysis, interpretation, and dissemination of disease data. Accurate and timely disease reporting is the foundation of an effective surveillance program, which is key to applying effective public health interventions to mitigate the impact of disease. What diseases are reportable? A list of reportable diseases is maintained in ARM 37.114.203. The list continues to evolve and is consistent with the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) list of Nationally Notifiable Diseases maintained by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). In addition to the named conditions on the list, any occurrence of a case/cases of communicable disease in the 20th edition of the Control of Communicable Diseases Manual with a frequency in excess of normal expectancy or any unusual incident of unexplained illness or death in a human or animal should be reported.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS)?
    What is Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS)? MCS (also known as TILT (Toxic-Induced Loss of Tolerance), Sick Building Syndrome, Chemical Allergy, and Environmental Illness) involves severe, chronic reactions to everyday products and by-products (fragrances, detergents, fabric softeners, air fresheners, new carpeting, newsprint, machine lubricants, auto exhaust, smoke, and 100’s more) that most people seemingly tolerate. Hundreds of MCS studies (and an increasing number of asthma studies) conclude that many patients become ill after long-term, low-level exposure to common environmental chemicals. For example, many people are now allergic to latex, a petrochemical that was formerly well-tolerated. MCS symptoms may include, among others, shortness of breath, sinus infections, headaches, mood swings, allergies, food allergies, mental confusion, memory loss, dermatitis, exhaustion, depression, swollen glands, earaches, toothaches, burning eyes, sinus infection, and stiffening of the jaw, neck, and shoulders. In many ways, sufferers feel like they have the flu. However, unlike flu symptoms, MCS reactions reoccur (and worsen) every time one is exposed to the triggering agents (even for just a few minutes), and the after-effects can be significant and long lasting (feeling much like a hangover). Because of its widespread use, one of the worst chemical offenders is fabric softener, either in liquid form or dryer sheets. These fragrance-filled petro-chemical products contain adhesives to make them stick to your clothes; however, they also stick to, and are readily absorbed by, your skin—the largest organ in your body. Patients with MCS typically react so profoundly to fabric softeners that some doctors have begun to challenge their patients with them during diagnostic examinations.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revised List of Diseases of Ornamental Plants Recorded in Western Australia
    Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Series 4 Volume 5 Number 9 September, 1964 Article 12 1-1-1964 A revised list of diseases of ornamental plants recorded in Western Australia O M. Goss Follow this and additional works at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/journal_agriculture4 Part of the Other Plant Sciences Commons, and the Plant Pathology Commons Recommended Citation Goss, O M. (1964) "A revised list of diseases of ornamental plants recorded in Western Australia," Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Series 4: Vol. 5 : No. 9 , Article 12. Available at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/journal_agriculture4/vol5/iss9/12 This article is brought to you for free and open access by Research Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Series 4 by an authorized administrator of Research Library. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. A REVISED LIST OF DISEASES OF ORNAMENTAL PLANTS RECORDED IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA Compiled from Department of Agriculture Records by OLGA M. GOSS, B.Sc. (Hons.), Plant Pathologist THIS list of ornamental diseases constitutes a revision of portion of the census published by Carne (1925) and added to by the same author in 1927. It contains also records of diseases identified in the period between these earlier publications and June 30, 1961. Parts of the disease record referring to vegetables, cereals, grasses and pasture legumes, native plants, weeds, field and fibre crops and fruit have already been published (Chambers 1959, 1960, 1961, MacNish 1963, Doepel 1964).
    [Show full text]