DOCSLIB.ORG

2017 Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2017 Annual Report 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Message from the Chief Page 3 Acknowledgements Page 4 Mission and Values Page 5 History Page 6 Headquarters Page 7 Operations Page 8 Support Services Page 9 Battalion 1 Page 10 Battalion 2 Page 11 Battalion 3 Page 12 Incidents and Fires Page 13 2016 vs. 2017 Comparison Page 14 Progress Page 15 In & Out of County Page 16 Retirements & Promotions Page 17 Academies Page 18 Employee Recognition Page 19 Community Involvement Page 20 Thank You Letters Page21 2 MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEF 2017 was a very busy year for the fire service in general and the Tulare County Fire Department was no exception. We had several large local incidents including several fires and a flood incident. We also assisted with several sizable out of county incidents, including the Thomas Fire and Tubbs Fire. The Tree Mortality Task Force made several presentations throughout the year to gain support for this important work. We will continue to move forward with these issues in our mountain communities. Due to the heavy rains in January and February in California, our Swift Water Rescue Team was activated earlier than usual with two successful rescues in February. In April, the combination of rising temperatures and snow melts lead to treacherous waterways. The Swift Water Rescue Team responded to 6 incidents throughout Tulare County and Sequoia National Park. The TCFD Swift Water team was able to host a media event with KMPH Channel 26 to demonstrate our training and equipment to the media in a positive man- ner. The month of May brought along the start of fire season and requests for assistance to the Elm Incident in Coalinga. TCFD sent the OES Strike Team in for a five day assignment to help out. June was an “All-hands-on-deck” month with the Dinely Fire in Three Rivers and the Kings River flooding event. In addition to these incidents, we had 3 Swift Water rescues. The month of August was a very taxing month on all Local, State and Federal fire resources. In California alone, there were several significant incidents reaching over the 10,000 acre mark including the Pier Fire (the largest Wildland fire in Tulare County’s history) which continued into the month of September and concluded with a total of 36,556 acres. At the end of September, TCFD began the move to our new Headquarters office. The move was a long time in the works with many renovations being completed to the building prior to the official move in date. TCFD’s Honor Guard also participated in the annual Cali- fornia Firefighter Memorial Ceremony at the Sacramento Capitol Park. In October, TCFD committed numerous resources to the multitude of incidents in Napa, Sonoma, Yuba, Orange and Mendocino County areas. Overall, approximately 7,000 homes were damaged or destroyed and 42 fatalities were reported. The month of November and the cooler weather significantly slowed down the incredible call volume that TCFD experienced the prior six months. However, moving into the month of December, the cooler weather had little impact on TCFD’s call volume and out of county activities. TCFD provided Overhead and Fire Suppression support to the Thomas Fire in Ventura and Santa Barbara County areas. The Thomas Fire consumed approximately 281,893 acres and is now the largest recorded fire in California history and is the seventh most destructive wildfire in California’s history. On behalf of the men and women of the Tulare County Fire Department, thank you for allowing us to serve you. Charlie Norman Fire Chief, Tulare County Fire Department 3 We would like to thank the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrative Officer for their ongoing support. Pictured left to right: Supervisor Pete Vander Poel, Supervisor Mike Ennis, Supervisor Kuyler Crocker, Supervisor Amy Shuklian, Supervisor Steve Worthley County Administrative Officer Michael Spata 4 MISSION STATEMENT The Tulare County Fire Department is committed to providing leadership, coordination and customer based service through fire prevention, suppression, and emergency medical services. CORE VALUES INTEGRITY RESPECT LOYALTY TEAMWORK COMPASSION VISION STATEMENT We are committed to excellence through professionalism and trustworthiness achieved through our daily operations. We will continue to expand our public service delivery model through innovative and fiscally-responsible practices. We will strive to offer our workforce the best opportunities available for training and education to further enhance the public service we provide. 5 The Tulare County Fire Department is a fairly new department, as far as full-service fire departments go. The Department, as it exists today, was created and started operations on July 1, 2007. Prior to that date, Tulare County residents received fire protection services from the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF) through a service contract. On December 20, 2005, the Tulare County Board of Supervisors decided to end their contract with CDF and to create a County Fire Department. The County Fire Department would be staffed by county employees and responsive to the direction set by the Board of Supervisors. In February of 2006, Steve Sunderland was hired as the Fire Chief for the new Tulare County Fire Department. Chief Sunderland hired an executive team to help him set in place the necessary elements that would allow for a smooth transition from CDF to a County Fire Department by July 1, 2007. He hired Division Chief Ted Mendoza for Operations, Division Chief John Crivello for Training and Division Chief Joe Garcia for Fire Prevention. A kick-off ceremony was held on June 29, 2007 with nationally recognized fire service leader, Ronny Coleman, being the guest speaker. July 1, 2007 marks the “birthday” of the Tulare County Fire Department. Chief Sunderland retired August 13, 2011 after five and a half years of service. On October 23, 2011, the Board of Supervisors appointed Division Chief Joe Garcia to become the Department’s second Fire Chief. Chief Garcia remained the Tulare County Fire Chief until January 9, 2016 when Charlie Norman took over the role of Tulare County Fire Chief. Chief Norman, has served as Fire Chief for over 2 years now and has continued the work of those before him in setting the Tulare County Fire Department up to be in a position of success. 6 HEADQUARTERS 7 OPERATIONS DIVISION 8 9 BATTALION Station1 Visalia ONE Station 2 Station 3 Kings River Dinuba Station 4 Cutler/Orosi Station 8 Ivanhoe Station 11 Station 12 Exeter Woodlake Station 13 Lemon Cove Station 14 Three Rivers Station 17 Badger 10 BATTALION Station 5 Posey Station 6 TWO California Hot Springs Station 15 Station 16 Lindsay Strathmore Station 18 Kennedy Meadows Station 19 Station 20 West Olive Doyle Colony Station 21 Terra Bella Station 22 Station 23 Springville Camp Nelson 11 BATTALION Station 7 Station 9 Goshen Alpaugh THREE Station 10 Station 25 Richgrove Tulare Station 26 Tipton Station 27 Pixley Station 28 Earlimart 12 Demands for service within the county continue to increase keeping us consistently busy. During 2017, we received a total of 12,353 calls for service throughout the county. 7,733 of those calls were for medical responses. Medical response calls range from basic medical aid calls, to citizens in their homes requiring our assistance, to vehicle accidents on one of the many roadways in the county. Fires made up 12.33% of our responses; of which 88 incidents involved the wildland in our foothills or forests. Significant fires of this sort included the Dinely, Hogback, Roadrunner, Schaffer, Hawk, Canyon 2, LNU Complex and Pier Fires. These all occurred within the boundaries of our county and used the majority of our local resources. Our local Swift Water Team kept busy during the year as well with responses to 19 rescues. We also responded to the large scale flooding of the Kings River outside of Kingsburg. The remainder of the calls in 2017 ranged from helping fallen citizens to hazardous material incidents. Tulare County Fire is an “All Hazard” fire department and we respond to almost all incidents within the county. 13 Although the incident volume between 2016 and 2017 is very similar, the types of incidents handled in 2017 were far more complex than in 2016. TCFD continues to respond to “All Hazard” calls throughout Tulare County. 14 TOTAL CALLS BY MONTH JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 947 841 958 994 1169 1138 1112 1076 998 1087 940 1093 15 In & Out of County Local Incidents Dinely Fire—339 acres Lion Fire—18,900 acres Roadrunner Fire—2,289 acres Schaeffer Fire—16,031 acres Hawk Fire—2,940 acres Hogback Fire—58 acres Pier Fire—36,566 acres; 2 structures destroyed—largest Wildfire in Tulare County history Kings River Flooding—residents from 90 homes displaced Out of County Elm Fire (Fresno County)—OES Strike Team; 10,343 acres Tubbs Fire (Napa County)—OES 278 Type 1; 36,807 acres; 5,636 structures destroyed; 22 fatalities Atlas Fire (Napa County)—OES 8534 Type 3; 51,624 acres; 783 structures destroyed; 6 fatalities Partrick/Nuns/Adobe/Norrbom/Pressly Fires—56,556 acres; 1,355 structures destroyed; 3 fatalities Canyon II Fire (Orange County)—9,217 acres; 25 structures destroyed Cascade Fire (Yuba County)—Type 6; 9,989 acres; 264 structures destroyed; 4 fatalities Thomas Fire (Ventura County)—281,893 acres; 1,063 structures destroyed; 2 fatalities Creek Fire (Los Angeles County)—15,619 acres; 123 structures destroyed Rye Fire (Los Angeles County)—6,049 acres; 6 structures destroyed Skirball Fire (Los Angeles County)—422 acres; 6 structures destroyed Lilac Fire (San Diego County)—4,100 acres; 157 structures destroyed Statewide—33 Fires 16 Into the Sunset We have always appreciated the Promotions within the fire service are experience each individual brings not easy achievements.
Recommended publications
  • Forest Fire Policy: Change Conventional Thinking of Smoke Management to Prioritize Long-Term Air Quality and Public Health

    Forest Fire Policy: Change Conventional Thinking of Smoke Management to Prioritize Long-Term Air Quality and Public Health

    Author's personal copy Air Qual Atmos Health DOI 10.1007/s11869-016-0405-4 Forest fire policy: change conventional thinking of smoke management to prioritize long-term air quality and public health D. W. Schweizer1 & R. Cisneros1 Received: 31 January 2016 /Accepted: 13 April 2016 # Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 Abstract Wildland fire smoke is inevitable. Size and intensity Keywords Widland fire . Air quality . Policy . Public health . of wildland fires are increasing in the western USA. Smoke-free Smoke management skies and public exposure to wildland fire smoke have effective- ly been postponed through suppression. The historic policy of suppression has systematically both instilled a public expecta- Wildland fire has long been understood to perform many ben- tion of a smoke-free environment and deferred emissions eficial ecosystem functions (Kilgore 1981; Stevens et al. through increased forest fuel loads that will lead to an eventual 2014) including helping to maximize carbon sequestration in large spontaneous release. High intensity fire smoke is fire-prone areas (Hurteau et al. 2008). Recurring lower inten- impacting a larger area including high density urban areas. sity wildland fire additionally limits fire spread, reduces fire Policy change has largely attempted to provide the avenue for progression (Parks et al. 2015), and may provide an avenue to increased use of ecologically beneficial fire but allows for control high-severity emissions of smoke (Steel et al. 2015), continued reliance on suppression as a primary tool for a smoke localizing the subsequent health impacts, decreasing exposure averse population. While understanding the essential role of and population at risk.
  • Fire Management Lessons Learned – Evolving Fire Management Programs 1

    Fire Management Lessons Learned – Evolving Fire Management Programs 1

    Fire Management Lessons Learned Evolving Fire Management Programs on the George Washington and Jefferson National Forests of Virginia, West Virginia, and Kentucky and Sequoia National Forest and Giant Sequoia National Monument of California Prepared for U.S. Forest Service Washington Office and Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center By Carol Ewell and David Kerr, with contributions by Scott Williams – Adaptive Management Services Enterprise Team (AMSET) and Frankie Romero and Tim Sexton – U.S. Forest Service November 2013 Fire Management Lessons Learned – Evolving Fire Management Programs 1 Contents Executive Summary…………………………………….………... 3 1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 2. George Washington and Jefferson National Forests……………………………………… 7 Theme 1: Organizational Culture……………………………………………………………… 7 Theme 2: Safety……………………………………………………………………………………..… 19 Theme 3: Economics……………………………………………………………………………..…. 21 Theme 4: Natural Resource Effects and Data Modeling…………………….…….. 22 3. Sequoia National Forest and Giant Sequoia National Monument…………..……… 29 Theme 1: Organizational Culture……………………………………………………………… 29 Theme 2: Safety………………………………………………………………………………..……… 40 Theme 3: Economics…………………………………………………………………………..……. 40 Theme 4: Natural Resource Effects and Data Modeling………………………..….. 43 4. National Goals Tie Ecosystem Restoration Together with Fire and Fuel Management…………………………………………………………..………. 47 5. Lessons Learned…………………………………………………………………………………..……….. 48 6. Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………..…….……. 51 7. References……………………………………………………………………………………………..…….
  • GSRMA-2019-Annual-Report Final.Pdf

    GSRMA-2019-Annual-Report Final.Pdf

    Mission Statement Golden State Risk Management Authority is established for the purpose of providing services and other functions necessary and appropriate for the creation, operation, and maintenance of liability, workers’ compensation, property and other risk pooling and coverage plans for the Member Agencies that are parties hereof, and to provide a forum for discussion, study, development and implementation of recommendations of mutual interest regarding risk pooling and insured programs. 1i GREETINGS! In the late 1970’s, two veteran insurance brokers in Northern California’s Glenn County, faced an insurance market for public entities that was all but non-existent. With few other options available, they envisioned the creation of an organization that would provide superior liability, workers’ compensation, and property/auto coverage to local public agencies at a more competitive cost than the open market. Their “vision” has evolved into what is now Golden State Risk Management Authority (GSRMA.) Over the last 40 years, GSRMA has not only done what its creators intended, but expanded their original vision to include additional coverages such as employee benefits and additional services such as training and risk control. In a testament to the viability of this vision, GSRMA continues to flourish. At the closing of our most current fiscal year, a review of our annual financial reports reflects a very solid year of growth. GSRMA’s strong fiscal position continues to serve the membership well. This is especially important as we start a challenging new phase in public entity risk pooling that will be especially interesting for the risk pooling industry, not only in California, but nationwide as well.
  • How the Local Implementation of Air Quality Regulations Affects Wildfire Air Policy

    How the Local Implementation of Air Quality Regulations Affects Wildfire Air Policy

    Beyond the Exceptional Events Rule: How the Local Implementation of Air Quality Regulations Affects Wildfire Air Policy Ben Richmond* What can be done about the recent phenomenon of intense wildfire air pollution in the American West? Wildfire science emphasizes the importance of using fire as a natural, regenerative process to maintain forest health and reduce large wildfire air pollution events. But forestry management policy has long emphasized suppressing wildfires, loading forests with fuel and increasing the risk of catastrophic wildfires. As a result, using prescribed fire to restore Western forests and reduce long-term air pollution creates tension with air quality law, because in the short term, prescribed fires will worsen air quality. Despite the exceptional events rule of the Clean Air Act allowing the use of prescribed fire as a wildfire management tool, the local implementation of air quality laws hinders the use of prescribed fire for forest management. Looking to California and more specifically the San Joaquin Valley as a case study, this Note uses new data to show that while land managers and air quality regulators in the San Joaquin Valley have drastically increased their use of prescribed fire, this increase is not sufficient to return the southern Sierra Nevada to a natural fire-adapted ecosystem. Policy makers should pursue even more aggressive options to encourage prescribed fire by modifying the structure of air quality law. Subjecting large wildfires to the requirements of the Clean Air Act would incentivize local air managers to develop plans on how to mitigate the effects of wildfire in the long term.
  • Fuel Treatment for Forest Resilience and Climate Mitigation: a Critical Review for Coniferous Forests of California

    Fuel Treatment for Forest Resilience and Climate Mitigation: a Critical Review for Coniferous Forests of California

    FUEL TREATMENT FOR FOREST RESILIENCE AND CLIMATE MITIGATION: A CRITICAL REVIEW FOR CONIFEROUS FORESTS OF CALIFORNIA A Report for: California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment Prepared By: Jason J. Moghaddas¹, Gary B. Roller¹, Jonathan W. Long4, David S. Saah1, Max A. Moritz³, Dan T. Stark³, David A. Schmidt¹, Thomas Buchholz¹, Travis J. Freed¹, Erin C. Alvey¹, John S. Gunn² 1 Spatial Informatics Group, LLC 2 Spatial Informatics Group - Natural Assets Laboratory 3 University of California Cooperative Extension 4 USDA Pacific Northwest Research Station DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as the result of work sponsored by the California Natural Resources Agency. It does not necessarily represent the views of the Natural Resources Agency, its employees, or the State of California. The Natural Resources Agency, the State of California, its employees, contractors, and subcontractors make no warrant, expressed or implied, and assume no legal liability for the information in this report; nor does any party represent that the uses of this information will infringe upon privately owned rights. This report has not been approved or disapproved by the Natural Resources Agency nor has the Natural Resources Agency passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of the information in this report. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Governor August 2018 CCCA4-CNRA-2018-017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank Dr. Brandon Collins, Mrs. Kathleen Bagby, and 3 anonymous reviewers for their review of this manuscript. i PREFACE California’s Climate Change Assessments provide a scientific foundation for understanding climate-related vulnerability at the local scale and informing resilience actions. These Assessments contribute to the advancement of science-based policies, plans, and programs to promote effective climate leadership in California.
  • Golden State Risk Management Authority

    Golden State Risk Management Authority

    GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AU T H O R I T Y ANNUAL REPORT 2017 Mission Statement “Golden State Risk Management Authority is established for the purpose of providing services and other functions necessary and appropriate for the creation, operation, and maintenance of liability, workers’ compensation, property and other risk pooling and coverage plans for the Member Agencies that are parties hereof, and to provide a forum for discussion, study, development and implementation of recommendations of mutual interest regarding risk pooling and insured programs.” Contents 1 Working for Public Entities Since 1979 2 Mount Shasta2 GSRMA Team 3 Letter to Members 4 2004-2016 Board of Directors Redding 6 Member Agencies – Location 7 Member Agencies – Date Joined 6 10 Member Agency Growth 11 GSRMA Total Assets 1979-2017 12 General Liability and Workers’ RenoCompensation Programs 13 Property and Miscellaneous Coverage Santa Rosa 13 Sacramento15 2016 Employee Benefits Program 17 2016 Loss Prevention & Training San Francisco Oakland 18 CAJPA Accreditation San Jose 19 Actuarial Policy and Program Funding 20 Overview of the Financial Position 24 24 Member Photos Salinas Fresno Mount Whitney Bakerseld Santa Maria CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Oxnard Los Angeles Huntington Beach Escondido San Diego Fire District Cemetery District Special District School District City & County Lighting the Way for California Public Entities Since 1979 olden State Risk Management Authority (GSRMA) is unique in California risk pools. We cater to small and middle-sized public entities that do not have the resources to fund all the expertise (human resource staff, dedicated legal counsel and even risk management and loss prevention Gpositions) that their larger counterparts can afford.
  • An Analysis of Wildland-Urban Fire with Implications for Preventing Structure Ignitions

    An Analysis of Wildland-Urban Fire with Implications for Preventing Structure Ignitions

    An Analysis of Wildland-Urban Fire with Implications for Preventing Structure Ignitions Jack Cohen, PhD Research Physical Scientist US Forest Service, retired Abstract Homes and communities exposed to inevitable extreme wildfire conditions do not have to suffer inevitable fire destruction. Research shows that the characteristics of a structure and its immediate surroundings within 30 meters principally determine structure ignitions; this area is called the home ignition zone (HIZ) and defines wildland-urban (WU) fires as a structure ignition problem and not a problem of controlling inevitable wildfires. Instead of failing to control extreme wildfire behavior, an approach of reducing ignition conditions within the HIZ resulting in ignition resistant structures can provide an effective alternative for preventing structure ignitions and thus wildland-urban (WU) fire disasters without necessarily controlling extreme wildfires. Introduction The fire destruction of urban, suburban and exurban development during wildfires has come to be known as the wildland-urban interface (WUI) fire problem. The term and its close variants have been used at least since 1974 (Butler 1974). Although this community fire destruction is initiated by wildfires, structure ignitions are not determined by geographic location; rather, the fire destruction is determined by the ignition conditions of a structure in relation to its immediate surroundings. Hence, the term wildland-urban (WU) fire is used without “interface,” “intermix,” or other geographic references. Further explanation can be found in the “Defining the WU Fire Problem” section below. Recent (1990 to 2017) wildland-urban fire disasters are listed in Table 1; however, destruction of towns and villages associated with wildfires in the United States (U.S.) commonly occurred in the fifty-five to one- hundred years before the term originated (Pyne 1982).
  • Situation Reports

    Situation Reports

    Situational Awareness Report - CA Wildfires July 24, 2017 Report ID #: 2017-0724-2345 Provide Feedback on this Report Notice: The information in this report is subject to change and the situation may have evolved since the compiling of this report. Summary There are several wildfires currently burning in California. This report includes information about the following fires: Fire County Comments Page(s) Dewiler Mariposa 60% contained; evacuations in effect 3 High Fire San Bernardino 70% contained; evacuations in effect 4 Whittier Santa Barbara 87% contained; evacuation warnings 5 - 6 Lost San Diego 60% contained 7 Schaeffer Tulare 94% contained 8 Park Fresno 99% contained 9 Long Valley Lassen 100% contained ** 9 Garza Fresno 100% contained ** 10 Alamo San Luis Obispo 100% contained ** 10 Wall Butte 100% contained ** 11 Grade Mendocino 100% contained ** 12 Bridge San Bernardino 100% contained ** 12 ** This is the final brief update for these fires. Additional Wildfire Resource Links are on page 13. Sharing Information with the CRA By sharing information we can gain a better overall understanding of the evolving situation. Please consider sharing with the CRA information about what you are seeing at your locations. You can designate your information as not to be shared further, to be shared on a limited need to know basis (e.g. With local EOCs), or okay to share with members and partners; and whether you want it shared anonymously or sourced. Send situational information to Monika Stoeffl, CRA Executive Director at [email protected].
  • International Association of Wildland Fire

    International Association of Wildland Fire

    Wikimedia Commons Mirko D’Andrea Brandon Frederick INTERNATIONAL S Y M P O S I U M S PROCEEDINGS mokeThe Marriott Inn & Conference Center University of Maryland University College October 21-24, 2013 Presented by In conjunction with National Wildfire Coordinating Group Smoke Committee & Joint Fire Science Program INTRODUCTION TO THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SMOKE SYMPOSIUM The International Smoke Symposium was held in Hyattsville, Maryland at the University of Maryland University College, USA, October 21-24, 2013. The objective of this symposium was to bring together air quality, fire, and smoke specialists from the research community, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), local/state/federal government agencies, tribes, and private practitioners and organizations to discuss the state-of-the-science and state-of-the-applied-science for smoke management and addressing the air quality impacts of wildland fire smoke. This objective was certainly met at this symposium. We had participants from several different organizations; organizations that don’t typically attend conferences about Wildland Fire such as the American Lung Association, NOAA and the EPA. It was our intention to bring these groups together and we were able to do that successfully. Another objective was to broaden our audience by providing the Symposium to a virtual audience. This turned out to be quite successful and we received great feedback from those who participated remotely. In addition, all of the presentations are still available online for those who were unable to attend. It is our intention to have another Smoke Symposium in the future and hope to continue this very important dialogue. The symposium included three workshops that preceded the conference on Monday, October 21st.
  • A New Direction for California Wildfire Policy— Working from the Home Outward

    A New Direction for California Wildfire Policy— Working from the Home Outward

    A New Direction for California Wildfire Policy— Working from the Home Outward February 11, 2019 Compiled by Douglas Bevington, Forest Director, Environment Now California Program [email protected] A New Direction for California Wildfire Policy— Working from the Home Outward Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................................................3 Introduction by Douglas Bevington .........................................................................................................................................4 Recommendations ..........................................................................................................................................................................7 A More Effective Approach for Preventing Wildland-Urban Fire Disasters by Jack Cohen .............................8 CalFire's 20th Century Fire Suppression Policy is Not Appropriate for a 21st Century Climate by Timothy Ingalsbee ..................................................................................................................................................................10 Common Myths about Forests and Fire by Chad Hanson ............................................................................................12 by Dominick DellaSala ..................................................14 Facts about California Forests, Wildfires, and Carbon Biomass Power is a False Solution by Brian
  • Oversight Hearing Committee on Natural Resources U.S

    Oversight Hearing Committee on Natural Resources U.S

    EXPLORING SOLUTIONS TO REDUCE RISKS OF CATASTROPHIC WILD- FIRE AND IMPROVE RESILIENCY OF NATIONAL FORESTS OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND INVESTIGATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION Wednesday, September 27, 2017 Serial No. 115–23 Printed for the use of the Committee on Natural Resources ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov or Committee address: http://naturalresources.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 27–027 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Mar 15 2010 11:32 Jan 09, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 J:\115TH CONGRESS\OVERSIGHT & INVESTIGATIONS\09-27-17\27027.TXT DARLEN COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES ROB BISHOP, UT, Chairman RAU´ L M. GRIJALVA, AZ, Ranking Democratic Member Don Young, AK Grace F. Napolitano, CA Chairman Emeritus Madeleine Z. Bordallo, GU Louie Gohmert, TX Jim Costa, CA Vice Chairman Gregorio Kilili Camacho Sablan, CNMI Doug Lamborn, CO Niki Tsongas, MA Robert J. Wittman, VA Jared Huffman, CA Tom McClintock, CA Vice Ranking Member Stevan Pearce, NM Alan S. Lowenthal, CA Glenn Thompson, PA Donald S. Beyer, Jr., VA Paul A. Gosar, AZ Norma J. Torres, CA Rau´ l R. Labrador, ID Ruben Gallego, AZ Scott R. Tipton, CO Colleen Hanabusa, HI Doug LaMalfa, CA Nanette Diaz Barraga´n, CA Jeff Denham, CA Darren Soto, FL Paul Cook, CA A.
  • 2020 Annual Report (PDF)

    2020 Annual Report (PDF)

    1i Mission Statement GREETINGS! Golden State Risk Management Authority is established for the purpose of providing services and other functions necessary and appropriate for the creation, operation, and It has been quite the year. maintenance of liability, workers’ compensation, property and other risk pooling and Internationally, Covid-19 has had devastating effect on the world economy and the health coverage plans for the Member Agencies that are parties hereof, and to provide a forum of the general populous. Nationally, we suffered through one of the most acrimonious for discussion, study, development and implementation of recommendations of mutual elections our country has had in over a century. We experienced racial strife, social unrest, interest regarding risk pooling and insured programs. a polarizing national press and a polarized public. Local businesses struggled or even closed for good. Travel plans were canceled, remote working and remote schooling became prevalent. Our way of life became an unending series of disruption and change. Table of Contents In public entity risk management, we are seeing: skyrocketing liability insurance costs due to huge settlements, unfavorable court cases and negative legislation; a difficult property market due to ongoing tragedies such as catastrophic wildfires and major weather events; increased regulation and Now is Our Time to Shine… ....................................................................................... 2 fees; the challenges and unknowns of workplace Covid-19 claims; and overall stress and angst in our governmental Working for California Public Entities since 1979… ............................................... 4 entities. Our Team ..................................................................................................................... 6 So many challenges, at so many levels all in one year. Member Agencies by Location ...........................................................................8 But adversity, with all the pain it brings, can effect positive change.