DOCSLIB.ORG

Sara Gunning, Director of International Relations Address: PO Box 4471

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sara Gunning, Director of International Relations Address: PO Box 4471 Point of Contact: Sara Gunning, Director of International Relations Address: P.O. Box 4471, Haifa 31043, Israel Tel: +485-55-901972 Fax: +972-04-8552772 Email: [email protected] Web: www.mossawa.org The Mossawa Center’s Briefing Paper on Human Rights for Arab Citizens in Israel: Discrimination Against the Arab Minority in Israel January 2018 The Mossawa Center is pleased to publish this report for the international community. This paper provides a concise update on the key developments and ongoing discrepancies in the civil, political, socioeconomic, and cultural status of the Arab minority in Israel. Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 2 Incidents of racism against Arab citizens .................................................................................. 2 Education ................................................................................................................................... 3 Media and the Press ................................................................................................................... 6 Pending and Current Discriminatory and Anti-Democratic Legislation ................................... 8 Discriminatory Budget Allocations ......................................................................................... 11 Employment Issues and Poverty ............................................................................................. 12 Land Discrimination ................................................................................................................ 15 Attempts to Quell Arab Demonstrators, Police Brutality, and Racially-instigated Terrorist Acts .......................................................................................................................................... 17 Respect for Political Rights ..................................................................................................... 18 Discrimination in Business and Tourism ................................................................................ 20 Cultural Rights ........................................................................................................................ 20 Expression and Incitement on the Internet .............................................................................. 21 Freedom of Movement ............................................................................................................ 24 Right to Health ........................................................................................................................ 25 Outlawing Islamic Institutions ................................................................................................ 26 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 27 Annex 1 ................................................................................................................................... 28 Annex 2 ................................................................................................................................... 31 Introduction The Arab Palestinian minority in Israel amounts to 20% of the country's population. Despite this, the hegemonic powers of the state and the exclusionary forces in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu‟s administration have continued to systematically discriminate against the Arab community and its elected representatives. This discrimination manifests itself in many distinct categories of daily life for Arab citizens in Israel, many of whom face systemic and disproportionate obstacles that negatively impact their experience as a minority group in Israel. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation (OECD) has found significant differences in well-being outcomes between the Jewish and the Arab population in Israel. Income inequality is very high in the country, despite the overall poverty rate being in decline since 2009: this is especially striking when considering levels and trends of poverty among different population groups. The most recent data show that the total poverty rate was 23.5% in Israel: this belies the disproportionate distribution of wealth across ethnic boundaries in Israel. Only 15.5% of Jews were poor, whilst over half of all Arab citizens in Israel – 57.9% - are living in poverty. The OECD has concluded from its findings that Israel needs to boost its human capital, currently significantly below the OECD average, mostly due to the low labour market participation amongst Arabs and other minority communities.1 Improving the social mobility and economic well-being of Arab citizens in Israel would thus not only inevitably increase the relative well-being of the population, but the economic health of the country overall. Incidents of racism against Arab citizens Between March 2015 and March 2016, there were 465 reported incidents of racism, almost double the number documented over the previous year (237). Of these, 311 were directed at the Arab community. These include racist actions by elected representatives, state and academic institutions, businesses, organizations, the media and members of the public. 2 Included in these incidents of racism against Arab citizens is the continued racial profiling at Ben Gurion airport. Several lawsuits are currently pending against the airport for racial profiling leading to degrading treatment of Arab citizens attempting to travel into or from the airport.3 The most recent elections in Israel saw an increase in racist rhetoric and incitement from many politicians, often invoked in order to gain votes. One of the most egregious of these statements came from Prime Minister Netanyahu himself. The Prime Minister made a short video telling the Israeli people that “The Arabs are coming out to vote in droves.”4 The statement suggested that Jewish Israeli voters must go out and vote for Likud in order to 1 OECD, (2016), „Measuring and Assessing Well-being in Israel‟ 2Mossawa Racism Report, Retrieved from: http://mossawa.org/en/article/view/534. 3Channel 2, http://reshet.tv/Shows/The_System/videomarklist,242911/. 4Tharoor, I, (2015, March 17), „On Israeli election day, Netanyahu warns of Arabs voting „in droves‟, The Washington Post 2 protect themselves from the “droves” of Arab voters.5 Many world leaders and activists expressed concern at this overtly racist attitude towards 20% of the Israeli population. Then- President Obama came out against Netanyahu‟s statement calling it "cynical" and "divisive."6 Other politicians engage in a similarly racist rhetoric. MK Bezalel Smotrich, for example, went so far as to justify segregation in maternity wards, saying “he doesn't want his wife lying next to a woman whose baby will murder her child in another 20 years.”7 Despite the fact that such inflammatory rhetoric has led to violence on the part of police officers and citizens, political and religious leaders face no legal repercussions for these statements. This is in stark contrast to the suspension of three Arab MKs to between two and four month periods for meeting the families of those killed carrying out attacks against Israeli citizens. MKs Basel Ghattas, Haneen Zoabi and Jamal Zakalka met with the families as part of a campaign conducted by the families and human rights groups seeking the return of the bodies of those killed for burial.8 In May 2016, Prime Minister Netanyahu appointed MK Avigdor Lieberman to the position of Minister of Defense. Many people, including local media, see Lieberman as a controversial figure for the racist and incisive statements he continuously makes against Palestinians and other Arabs, including suggesting that Arab MKs should be tried as in Nuremberg and describing the killer of an incapacitated Palestinian assailant as a “hero”. He is also well known for continuing to question the loyalty of Palestinian citizens of Israel, and has campaigned to make them sign a loyalty pledge or have their citizenship revoked.9 Education Structural discrimination persistently threatens the education of Arab citizens in Israel. The Israeli school system separates students on the basis of race and religion. While this caters to linguistic needs, it also lends itself to discrimination.10 Such discrimination only serves to exacerbate pre-existing inequalities that are the result of decades of state policies that have disrupted growth in Arab communities in Israel. According to the Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) and the Ministry of Education, most of the students in the Arab sector come from low socioeconomic backgrounds. In fact, an alarming two thirds of Arab students come from families living below the poverty line, as compared to one third of students nation- wide. 11 One might attribute this to the relatively low levels of education in the Arab community, as opposed to the Jewish community. Among the latter, aged fifteen and over, 84% have completed elementary school. Among Arabs in the same group, only 37% have finished elementary school.12 The percentage of Bedouin students studying in institutions of higher education is especially low, with those between the ages of 18-27 in higher education 5 ibid. 6 Lewis, P and Yuhas, A, (2015, March 18), „Obama snubs Binyamin Netanyahu and criticizes Israel PM‟s „divisive rhetoric‟‟, The Guardian 7Lis, J, (2016, April 5), „Israeli Lawmaker: My Wife Wouldn‟t Want to Give Birth Next to an Arab Woman‟,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How Palestinians Can Burst Israel's Political Bubble
    Al-Shabaka Policy Brief Policy Al-Shabaka March 2018 WHEN LEFT IS RIGHT: HOW PALESTINIANS CAN BURST ISRAEL’S POLITICAL BUBBLE By Amjad Iraqi Overview the allies holding up his fragile rule, from the ultra- orthodox Jewish parties to his personal rivals within Although no indictments have been issued yet, Israelis Likud. “King Bibi,” however, survived them all. A are speculating whether the latest developments in skilled politician, he has been adept at managing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s corruption Israel’s notoriously volatile coalition system, and [email protected] scandals finally mark the beginning of his political has remained in power with three consecutive demise. The second-longest serving prime minister governments over nine years – each more right wing after David Ben-Gurion, Netanyahu has had a than the last.2 profound impact on Israel’s political scene since the 1990s. It is therefore troubling, especially to Netanyahu directly influenced the country’s media Palestinians, that if these corruption cases are the landscape by shaping the editorial stance of Israel harbinger of Netanyahu’s downfall, they will have Hayom (the nation’s gratis, most-read newspaper, had nothing to do with the more egregious crimes for funded by American billionaire Sheldon Adelson), which he is responsible, and for which he – and future and used the Communications Ministry to threaten Israeli leaders – have yet to be held accountable. and harass media outlets that were critical of him. Despite crises and condemnations throughout This policy brief analyzes Israel’s political his career – including mass Israeli protests for transformations under Netanyahu and maps out the socioeconomic justice in 2011 and, more recently, current leadership contenders from a Palestinian weekly protests against widespread government perspective.1 It argues that Israel’s insular political corruption – Netanyahu withstood public pressures discourse, and the increasing alignment of Israeli to step down.
    [Show full text]
  • SETA Policy Brief
    SETA Policy Brief SETA | Foundation for Political, Economic and Social Research | September, 2011 | www.setav.org | Brief No: 55 A Raid from the Sea: The Gaza Flotilla Attack and Blockade under Legal Scrutiny Ufuk Ulutaş S E TA POLICY BRIEF ABSTRACT The publication of the Palmer report written by the panel of inquiry established by the UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon once again brought the 31 May 2010 Gaza Flotilla incident and the blockade of Gaza back to world’s attention. On May 31, 2010, Israeli commandos stormed a passenger ship, the Mavi Marmara, the largest boat of a flotilla of six boats which were carrying 10000 tons of humanitarian aid to besieged Gaza, in international high waters. The operation left 9 activists dead and over 30 activists wounded. The Israeli military assault against the Mavi Marmara immediately ignited worldwide protests and condemnation. Turkey, whose citizens were attacked by Israeli soldiers in international high waters, 72 miles away from the Gazan coast, took the lead in protests and condemnation. Israel, however, claimed that the demonstrators on the Mavi Marmara were aiming to break the blockade of Gaza and the Israeli commandos were forced onboard to react in an act of self-defense. During more than a year past since the Mavi Marmara attack, Israel has committed a chain of errors which started with the illegal blockade of Gaza. Using the blockade as a pretext, Israel intercepted the Mavi Marmara and used excessive force killing 9 civilians on board. Israel’s violations of international law were documented thoroughly in the UNHRC report, while the Palmer Commission penned a report with political rather than legal and humanitarian priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • A Future for Israeli-Palestinian Peacebuilding
    Britain Israel Communications and Research Centre A future for Israeli-Palestinian peacebuilding Ned Lazarus July 2017 The Israel-Palestine conflict is one of the most heavily researched in the world. Yet a shockingly small fraction of this research focuses on the millions of Israelis and Palestinians who share this land, their relations with one another, and how such relations could be improved so that a breakthrough might be possible. This report is both timely and necessary, and can hopefully provide a blueprint for greater international support of civil society efforts to foster conflict resolution. John Lyndon Executive Director of OneVoice Europe and Research Fellow at Kings College London BICOM, the Britain Israel Communications and Research Centre, is an independent British think tank producing research and analysis to increase understanding of Israel and the Middle East in the UK. Fathom: for a deeper understanding of Israel and the region is BICOM’s online research journal, publishing interviews, articles and reviews from a range of Israeli, Palestinian and international contributors. Front Cover Photo: EcoPeace’s Israeli, Jordanian and Palestinian directors and staff standing together in the Jordan River as part of their campaign to rehabilitate the river which is dwindling due to diversion of its source waters and pollution. Photograph used by permission of EcoPeace. The Author Ned Lazarus is Visiting Professor of International Affairs at the George Washington University’s Elliott School, and an Israel Institute Teaching Fellow. A conflict resolution scholar, practitioner and evaluator, Ned has conducted evaluative studies of Israeli-Palestinian peacebuilding initiatives on behalf of USAID, USIP and the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • David Abrams, Attorney at Law August 21, 2019 To
    David Abrams, Attorney at Law P.O. Box 3353 Church Street Station, New York NY 10008 Tel. 212-897-5821 Fax 212-897-5811 August 21, 2019 To: Internal Revenue Service (by FedEx) Whistleblower Office - ICE 1973 N. Rulon White Blvd. M/S 4110 Ogden, UT 84404 Re: Whistleblower Complaint Against New Israel Fund Dear Sir / Madam: I am the whistleblower in connection with the above-referenced Complaint. Enclosed please find a completed IRS Form 211.. Further, I am respectfully submitting this memorandum to elaborate on the factual and legal aspects of the enclosed IRS whistleblower complaint. In addition, I am enclosing a CD which contains the full, unannotated versions of the documents attached as Exhibits hereto. 1. Who is New Israel Fund? New Israel Fund (“NIF”) is a District of Columbia non-profit 501(c)(3) corporation with its principal place of business in the State of New York, county of New York. NIF financially supports many companies that work to undermine the state of Israel. As set forth in more detail below, NIF has crossed the line from permissible advocacy to unlawful "electioneering." Put another way, NIF is violating the tax codes by attempting to influence the outcome of elections. As stated on its own web site, NIF works on its “concerted campaign to equip Israel’s pro-democracy and progressive forces with the tools to fight Israel’s regressive right-and win.” As set forth in more detail below, NIF's activities are flagrant and unlawful electioneering in violation of the tax code. 2. Who is the Whistleblower? I am a New York attorney and political activist who regularly engages in pro- Israel litigation in state and federal Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019
    WID.world WORKING PAPER N° 2020/17 Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019 Yonatan Berman August 2020 Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949{2019 Yonatan Berman∗ y August 20, 2020 Abstract This paper draws on pre- and post-election surveys to address the long run evolution of vot- ing patterns in Israel from 1949 to 2019. The heterogeneous ethnic, cultural, educational, and religious backgrounds of Israelis created a range of political cleavages that evolved throughout its history and continue to shape its political climate and its society today. De- spite Israel's exceptional characteristics, we find similar patterns to those found for France, the UK and the US. Notably, we find that in the 1960s{1970s, the vote for left-wing parties was associated with lower social class voters. It has gradually become associated with high social class voters during the late 1970s and later. We also find a weak inter-relationship between inequality and political outcomes, suggesting that despite the social class cleavage, identity-based or \tribal" voting is still dominant in Israeli politics. Keywords: Political cleavages, Political economy, Income inequality, Israel ∗London Mathematical Laboratory, The Graduate Center and Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality, City University of New York, [email protected] yI wish to thank Itai Artzi, Dror Feitelson, Amory Gethin, Clara Mart´ınez-Toledano, and Thomas Piketty for helpful discussions and comments, and to Leah Ashuah and Raz Blanero from Tel Aviv-Yafo Municipality for historical data on parliamentary elections in Tel Aviv.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestine-Israel Journal
    Palestine-Israel Journal PIJ Policy Paper No. 3 Palestinian Refugees and the Two-State Solution Findings and recommendations of an expert roundtable discussion Jerusalem, December 2009 Moderated and Edited by Ziad Abu Zayyad & Hillel Schenker Organized and drafted by Jumana AZ Jaouni & Ofer Zalzberg This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the PALESTINE-ISRAEL Journal and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union. PIJ POLICY PAPER - PALESTINIAN REFUGEES AND THE TWO-STATE SOLUTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The issue of the Palestinian refugees is at the core of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and an agreement on this core issue is central to the survival of any political settle- ment to the conflict based upon the two-state solution. No settlement to this conflict can be achieved without reaching a fair and just solution to the refugee problem. Total rejection of the Palestinian refugees’ right of return or of responsibility for the refugee problem seems counterproductive, as does the insistence on the full actual practice of this right. One side must relinquish its position, or both sides should take the necessary steps and meet somewhere along the spectrum between the two diametrically opposed positions. It is precisely because of its centrality that it was decided to assess the impact of the refugee problem on the prospects for achieving the two-state solution. The main objective is to advise on what could or should be the policy for a two-state solution to remain viable and sustainable and to be implemented as soon as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    FRAMEWORK CONTRACT COMMISSION 2007 Lot Nr 4 Contract Nr 2010/254278 Mapping Study of Civil Society Organisations in the occupied Palestinian territory Final Report May 2011 Experts Gianfrancesco Costantini Jamal Atamneh Khaled Ayesh Feda Al Husseini This Project is funded by the European Commission Project implemented by Final Report Page 1 of 99 The content of this report is the sole responsibility of the authors and should in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. For further information on the EC thematic programmes in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt), please visit the following websites: European Union Representative Office the West Bank and Gaza: http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/westbank/projects/overview/index_en.htm EuropeAID page on oPt: http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/where/neighbourhood/country- cooperation/occupied_palestinian_territory/occupied-palestinian-territory_en.htm An electronic version of the Mapping Study can be downloaded from the following link: http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/westbank/projects/overview/index_en.htm Final Report Page 2 of 99 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 7 1. Background: Institutional Framework and Objectives ............................................................... 12 2. Theoretical and Methodological Framework ............................................................................. 13 2.1. Theoretical framework of the study..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Isratin: the One-State Solution to the Israeli-Palestinian
    Isratin: The One-State Solution to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Ken-Ben Chao War in the 20th Century Mr. John Bickel January 6, 2011 An anxious crowd of two hundred and fifty people gathered and waited outside the Tel Aviv Museum on May 14, 1948. Within the next thirty-two minutes, the State of Israel was formally established. After nearly two millennia in exile, the Jewish homeland was reborn. The next day, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq attacked Israel, prompting the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. Within the next sixty years, several other wars would be fought over the Israeli-Palestinian question. Today, the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, or Arab-Israeli Conflict, remains a critical obstacle to world peace and stability in the Middle East. Though peace talks have been in progress for decades, numerous issues continue to obstruct success in the negotiations. If a viable solution to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict is not created and implemented, the conflict will continue to plague the region with terrorism and war. Despite many proposed solutions, obstacles such as Jerusalem, the Israeli settlements, and Palestinian terrorism impede significant progress in the peace talks. With the numerous issues regarding the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, the best solution is a gradual reintegration of Palestinians into the Holy Land, a relaxation of tensions between the various factions, and the beginning of serious negotiations towards an eventual one-state solution. History In order to fully comprehend the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, an understanding of the region’s bloody history must first be attained. The origin of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict goes as far back as the Biblical era.
    [Show full text]
  • In Israel's Elections, Racism Is the Winning Ballot
    Adalah's Post-Election Commentary: In Israel's elections, racism is the winning ballot The 2015 Israeli elections saw an unprecedented level of racist incitement against Palestinian Arab citizens of Israel, which played a critical part in the election's events and results. Regardless of the debates that will unfold in the follow-up to this election, it is clear that racism was the most victorious ballot. 23 March 2015 The elections for the 20th Israeli Knesset was not lacking in drama: media ploys, political realignments, and several surprises as the right-wing Likud party, contrary to many expectations, defeated the Zionist Union, considered to be a center-left party in Israel. The elections also saw an unprecedented level of racist incitement against Palestinian Arab citizens of Israel, a fifth of the population, which played a critical part in the election's events and results. This series of threats, intimidations, and attempts to delegitimize Arab citizens and their political participation, which occurred throughout the process, did not end until the polls closed on 17 March. The Prime Minister announced the latest election after the dissolution of the 19th Israeli Knesset in December 2014. During that government's term (2013-2014), the Knesset amended the Election Law, which raised the threshold required to enter the parliament from 2% to 3.25%. The goal behind this new law was to substantially weaken or exclude the three main Arab political parties, which ran separately for the Knesset, with each attaining 3 to 4 seats. In response to the new law, the Arab parties decided to run together as a single slate – called the Joint List (al-Qa'imah al-Mushtarakah) in Arabic) – despite their political and ideological differences.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
    Understanding the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Global Classroom Workshops made possible by: THE Photo Courtesy of Bill Taylor NORCLIFFE FOUNDATION A Resource Packet for Educators Compiled by Kristin Jensen, Jillian Foote, and Tese Wintz Neighbor And World May 12, 2009 Affairs Council Members HOW TO USE THIS RESOURCE GUIDE Please note: many descriptions were excerpted directly from the websites. Packet published: 5/11/2009; Websites checked: 5/11/2009 Recommended Resources Links that include… Lesson Plans & Charts & Graphs Teacher Resources Audio Video Photos & Slideshows Maps TABLE OF CONTENTS MAPS 1 FACT SHEET 3 TIMELINES OF THE CONFLICT 4 GENERAL RESOURCES ON THE ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN CONFLICT 5 TOPICS OF INTEREST 7 CURRENT ARTICLES/EDITORIALS ON THE ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN CONFLICT 8 (Focus on International Policy and Peace-Making) THE CRISIS IN GAZA 9 RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES: WEEK OF MAY 4TH 10 RELATED REGIONAL ISSUES 11 PROPOSED SOLUTIONS 13 ONE-STATE SOLUTION 14 TWO-STATE SOLUTION 14 THE OVERLAPPING CONUNDRUM – THE SETTLEMENTS 15 CONFLICT RESOLUTION TEACHER RESOURCES 15 MEDIA LITERACY 17 NEWS SOURCES FROM THE MIDEAST 18 NGOS INVOLVED IN ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN RELATIONS 20 LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS & RESOURCES 22 DOCUMENTARIES & FILMS 24 BOOKS 29 MAPS http://johomaps.com/as/mideast.html & www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/is.html Other excellent sources for maps: From the Jewish Virtual Library - http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/maptoc.html Foundation for Middle East Peace - http://www.fmep.org/maps/
    [Show full text]
  • Division for Palestinian Rights
    DIVISION FOR PALESTINIAN RIGHTS UNITED NATIONS ASIAN MEETING IN SUPPORT OF THE INALIENABLE RIGHTS OF THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE UNITED NATIONS FORUM OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN SUPPORT OF THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 15-17 December 2006 07-54067 CONTENTS I. United Nations Asian Meeting in Support of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People Paragraphs Page Introduction ……………………………………………………………… 1-6 3 Opening statements…….………………………………………………… 7-33 3 Plenary sessions...………………………………………………………… 34-75 7 Plenary I…………………………………………………………………... 34-47 7 Plenary II………………………………………………………………….. 48-62 8 Plenary III…………………………………………………………………. 63-75 10 Closing session……………………………………………………………. 76-82 12 II. United Nations Forum of Civil Society in Support of the Palestinian People Opening statements.....………………………………………………….. 83-86 14 Plenary I…………………………………………………………………. 87-99 14 Plenary II………………………………………………………………… 100-117 16 Closing session…………………………………………………………… 118-119 19 Annexes I. Kuala Lumpur Declaration……………………………………………………………………. 20 II. Call for Action………………………………………………………………………………… 23 III. List of Participants……………………………………………….……………………………. 24 2 I. United Nations Asian Meeting in Support of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People Introduction 1. The United Nations Asian Meeting in Support of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People was held in Kuala Lumpur on 15 and 16 December 2006, under the auspices of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People and in accordance with the provisions of General Assembly resolutions 60/36 and 60/37 of 1 December 2005. The Meeting was followed, on 17 December 2006, by a United Nations Forum of Civil Society in Support of the Palestinian People held at the same venue. 2. The Committee was represented by a delegation comprising Paul Badji (Senegal), Chairman of the Committee; Rodrigo Malmierca Díaz (Cuba), Vice-Chairman of the Committee; Ravan A.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Bush's "New World Order" and Aircraft Carriers in the Persian Gulf and Red Sea to Drop Their Payloads of Death Upon the People of Baghdad
    WfJ/lNElIS,,I"(J(J,I/I, 25¢ No.519 ~X-523 1 February 1991 • ar in I e • • I erslan • Less than 16 hours after the deadline ran out for George Bush's ultimatum, squadrons of U.S. jets and bombers screamed off runways in Saudi Arabia Bush's "New World Order" and aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf and Red Sea to drop their payloads of death upon the people of Baghdad. Means Imperialist Slaughter Across the U.S. and Europe, outraged demonstrators poured into the streets by the thousands. While the media presented gushing accounts of a high-tech video war game and romantic sunset shots of U.S. fighter planes, millions in Baghdad and other Iraqi cities were experiencing the all-too-real stench of death on· the streets and the screech of terror from the skies. The White House proclaimed: "The liberation of Kuwait has begun." the Spartacist League said: "The mass mur­ der of the Iraqi people had begun." To believe the first hours of TV cover­ age, the high-tech U.S. war machine was sweeping the field in a seemingly blood­ less war that would be all but over by breakfast. Bush cheered that his dogs of war were "right on schedule." Before midnight the first "instant poll" results were in: 86 percent say "yes" to war. Evangelist preacher Billy Graham was called to the White House to stay in the guest bedroom and conduct a prayer breakfast the next morning. Wall Street, too, thanked god for being on "our side": "After a moment of si­ lent prayer for the troops in the Persian Gulf and a short clang of the opening bell...trading got off to a flying start," AP the New York Times (18 January) wrote, The Revelation of "High Tech." Battleship Wisconsin launches Tomahawk cruise missile.
    [Show full text]