A Chromosome Phylogeny of the Droseraceae by Using CMA-DAPI Fluorescent Banding

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Chromosome Phylogeny of the Droseraceae by Using CMA-DAPI Fluorescent Banding C 1998 The Japan Mendel Society Cytologia 63: 329-339, 1998 A Chromosome Phylogeny of the Droseraceae by Using CMA-DAPI Fluorescent Banding Yoshikazu Hoshi and Katsuhiko Kondo1 Laboratory of Plant Chromosome and Gene Stock, Faculty of Science, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima City 739-8526, Japan Accepted May 21, 1998 Summary Aldrovanda vesiculosa L., Dionaea muscipula Ellis, 20 species of Drosera L. and Dros- ophyllum lusitanicum Link. were investigated for a metaphase chromosome analysis by using the se- quentially fluorescent CMA and DAPI staining methods. Aldrovanda vesiculosa and the Drosera species showed numerous small-sized chromosomes and some middle-sized chromosomes with no primary constriction. Dionaea muscipula had the middle-sized chromosomes with the localized cen- tromeres and CMA-negative and DAPI-positive pericentric bands. Drosophyllum lusitanicum dis- played quite large-sized chromosomes with well-defined localized-centromeres. Computer-aided measurements of metaphase chromosomes stained with CMA and DAPI showed that Aldrovanda vesiculosa and the Drosera species displayed the common features such as localization of CMA-pos- itive and DAPI-negative satellites and non-staining region. Key words CMA, DAPI, Diffused centromere, Aldrovanda vesiculosa, Dionaea muscipula, Drosera, Drosophyllum lusitanicum, Droseraceae, Localized centromere. The Droseraceae consists of four genera; the monotypic Aldrovanda L., Dionaea Ellis and Drosophyllum Link., and the polytypic Drosera L. with approximately 90 species (Diels 1906, Marchant and George 1982). The Droseraceae is a monophyletic family with remarkable differ- ences of chromosomes in size (Rothfels and Heimburger 1968, Stebbins 1971) and in localized and diffused centromeres (Behre 1929, Rothfels and Heimburger 1968, Kondo et al. 1976, Kondo and Segawa 1988, Sheikh and Kondo 1995, Sheikh et al. 1995, Hoshi and Kondo 1998). Drosera has a diffused centromeric chromosome which is disadvantage to designate conventional karyotype (Kondo et al. 1976). Some species of Drosera have a difficulty of chromosome measurements due to small-sized chromosome with obscure euchromatic ends (Rothfels and Heimburger 1968). Extensive cytological studies have been done in Aldrovanda vesiculosa (Kondo 1969, Kress 1970), Dionaea muscipula (Behre 1929, Sato 1947, Kondo 1970), various species of Drosera (e.g. Shimamura 1941, Wood 1955, Kondo 1966, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1976, 1984, Kondo et al. 1976, Kondo and Olivier 1979, Ficini et al. 1980, Beuzenberg and Hair 1983, Kondo and Segawa 1988, Hoshi et al. 1994, Kondo et al. 1994, Sheikh and Kondo 1995, Sheikh et al. 1995, Hoshi and Kondo 1998), and Drosophyllum lusitanicum (Behre 1929, Rothfels and Heimburger 1968). Recently some Drosera studies have demonstrated that fluorochromes such as chromomycin A3 (CMA) and 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) were useful dyes to obtain well-stained chromosomes with clear ends and characteristic bands (Sheikh and Kondo 1995, Hoshi and Kondo 1998). Furthermore, computer-aided metaphase measurements offered objective and accurate chro- mosomal analysis (Hoshi and Kondo 1998). In this study, CMA and DAPI fluorescent staining karyotypes in Aldrovanda vesiculosa, Dion- aea muscipula, 20 species of Drosera, and Drosophyllum lusitanicum are analyzed by using a com- 1 Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Contribution no. 58 of Laboratory of Plant Chro- mosome and Gene Stock. 330 Yoshikazu Hoshi and Katsuhiko Kondo Cytologia 63 puter to justify phylogenetic relationships and to speculate speciation and evolution in chromo- somes of the Droseraceae. Materials and methods Plant materials Aldrovanda vesiculosa, Dionaea muscipula, 20 species of Drosera and Drosophyllum lusitan- icum used are listed in Table 1. Seeds of the Drosera species were purchased from Western Aus- tralia, Australia and sowed and germinated both in vitro and in vivo in the Laboratory of Plant Chromosome and Gene Stock, Faculty of Science, Hiroshima University. For in vitro culture of the Drosera species seeds were surface-sterilized and sown on sterilized 1/2 strength of Murashige and Skoog basal medium (MS; Murashige and Skoog 1962) supplemented with 0.2% gelrite without Table 1. Source of the materials of Aldrovanda vesiculosa, Dionaea muscipula, 20 species of Drosera and Drosophyllum lusitanicum investigated 1998 Chromosome Phylogeny of the Droseraceae 331 any growth substance. Taxonomic treatment of Drosera followed basically Diels (1906). Slide preparation Growing root tips in vitro were harvested and pretreated with 0.002 M hydroxyquinoline for 2 hr at 18C before fixation with 45% acetic acid for 5 min and then, hydrolysis with a mixture of 1N hydrochloric acid and 45% acetic acid (2 : 1) at 60C for 7 sec. Their root meristems were cut and squashed in 45% acetic acid. The preparations were air-dried for 48 hr at room temperature after removal of coverslips with dry ice. Fluorescent staining The method of sequentially fluorescent staining with distamycin A and chromomycin A3 (DMA-CMA staining) followed Schweizer (1981) with slight modification. The air-dried slides after the coverslip was removed were used for sequential DMA-CMA staining: They were preincu- bated in Mcllvine's buffer (pH 7.0) for 30 min, treated with 0.1 mg/ml DMA (Sigma) in Mcllvine's buffer for 10 min in a humid chamber and rinsed in Mcllvine's buffer supplemented with 2.5 mg/ml MgSO4 for 10 min. After rinsed, they were stained with 0.1 mg/ml CMA (Sigma) in Mcllvine's buffer supplemented with Mg504 for 10 min. Then, they were mounted with glycerol and stored at 4C for 12 hr to prevent fading. These chromosomes stained with DMA-CMA were irradiated with BV (blue violet) filter cassette and fluoresced yellow. The method of sequentially fluorescent staining with actinomycin D and DAPI (AMD-DAPI staining) followed Schweizer (1976) with slight modification. After DMA-CMA staining, the slides were used for sequential AMD-DAPI staining: The slides were destained in 45% acetic acid for 30 min, rinsed in distilled water for 5 min. They were dipped in Mcllvine's buffer for 30 min, treated in 0.25 mg/ml AMD (Sigma) in Mcllvine's buffer for 15 min in a humid chamber and rinsed in Mcllvine's buffer for 10 min. After rinsed, they were mounted in glycerol and observed immediate- ly. These chromosomes stained with AMD-DAPI were irradiated with UV (ultra violet) filter cas- sette and fluoresced blue. Photographs were taken with the Professional T-MAX film (ISO 400) in a Nikon fluorescent microscope. Chromosome measurements Chromosome classification followed Hoshi and Kondo (1998). Additionally, super large-sized chromosomes of Drosophyllum lusitanicum were designated karyotype formulae. The karyotype formulae were based on measurements of 30 metaphase cells. Chromosome sizes were defined as: Super large (LL) >15.00 um2 in area, large (L) 6.00-14.99 um2, middle (M) 1.50-5.99 pm2, and small (5) <1.49 um2. Degree of karyotype symmetry at mitotic metaphase was estimated according to Stebbins' classification (1971). Ratio of the largest chromosome to the smallest chromosome was calculated by average area of the largest chromosome/average area of the smallest chromosome. In- terchromosomal asymmetry index proposed by Romero Zarco (1986) was calculated by standard deviation of average area of chromosome complement/average area of chromosome complement. This index provides a way of estimating variation of chromosome area. Results and discussion Figs. 1-3 illustrate the results of DMA-CMA and AMD-DAPI staining in the chromosomes of Aldrovanda vesiculosa, Dionaea muscipula, 20 species of Drosera, and Drosophyllum lusitanicum of the Droseraceae. Table 2 and Fig. 4 show the results of mitotic chromosome numbers, total chro- mosome area and standard deviation, individual chromosome area from the largest to the smallest chromosome, average area of chromosome complement+ standard deviation of each species and 332 Yoshikazu Hoshi and Katsuhiko Kondo Cytologia 63 1998 Chromosome Phylogeny of the Droseraceae 333 334 Yoshikazu Hoshi and Katsuhiko Kondo Cytologia 63 Fig. I. Mitotic-metaphase chromosomes in somatic cells of Drosera, subgen. Rorella, sect. Rossolis stained with DMA-CMA (a, c, e, g, i, k, m, o, q) and AMD-DAPI (b, d, f, h, j, 1, n, p, r). a, b) D. aliciae. c, d) D. capensis. e, f) D. collinsiae. g, h) D. dielsiana. i, j) D. hilaris. k, 1) D. madagascariensis. m, n) D. montana. o, p) D. trinervia. Two middle-sized chromosomes were observed (arrowheads). q, r) D. vil- losa. CMA-positive and DAPI-negative sites were observed in D. aliciae, D. capensis, D. dielsiana, D. hilaris, D. madagascariensis, D. montana, D. trinervia and D. villosa (arrows). Bar= 5 pm. 1998 Chromosome Phylogeny of the Droseraceae 335 Fig. 2. Mitotic-metaphase chromosomes in somatic cells of Drosera stained with DMA-CMA (a, c, e, g, i, k, m, o, q, s, u) and AMD-DAPI (b, d, f, h, j, 1, n, p, r, t, v). a, b) D. burmanni, sect. Thelocalyx. c, d) D. sessilifolia, sect. Thelocalyx. e, f) D. adelae, sect. Arachnopus. g, h) D. indica, sect. Arachnopus. i,j) D. prolifera, sect. Arachnopus. k, l) D. hamiltonii, sect. Stelogyne. m, n) D. binata, sect. Phycopsis. o, p) D. cist(ora, sect. Ptycnostigma, q, r) D. pauciflora, sect. Ptycnostigma. Two middle- and six small-sized chromosomes (arrowheads) were more than 1.00 pm2 area, while 32 small-size chromosomes less than 0.99 um2 area. s, t) D. auriculata, sect. Polypeltes. u, v) D. peltata, sect. Polypeltes. CMA-positive and DAPI-negative sites were observed in D. burmanni, D. sessilifolia, D. adelae, D. indica, D. prolifera, D. hamiltanii, D. binata, D. cistiflora, D. pauciflora and D. peltata (arrows). Bar=5 pm. Cytologia 63 336 Yoshikazu Hoshi and Katsuhiko Kondo Fig. 3. Mitotic-metaphase chromosomes in somatic cells of three monotypic genera of the Droser- aceae stained with DMA-CMA (a, c, e) and AMD-DAPI (b, d, f). a, b) Aldrovanda vesiculosa. The chro- mosomes did not obviously visualize any localized-centromere and showed CMA-positive and DAPI- negative sites (arrows).
Recommended publications
  • Status of Insectivorous Plants in Northeast India
    Technical Refereed Contribution Status of insectivorous plants in northeast India Praveen Kumar Verma • Shifting Cultivation Division • Rain Forest Research Institute • Sotai Ali • Deovan • Post Box # 136 • Jorhat 785 001 (Assam) • India • [email protected] Jan Schlauer • Zwischenstr. 11 • 60594 Frankfurt/Main • Germany • [email protected] Krishna Kumar Rawat • CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute • Rana Pratap Marg • Lucknow -226 001 (U.P) • India Krishna Giri • Shifting Cultivation Division • Rain Forest Research Institute • Sotai Ali • Deovan • Post Box #136 • Jorhat 785 001 (Assam) • India Keywords: Biogeography, India, diversity, Red List data. Introduction There are approximately 700 identified species of carnivorous plants placed in 15 genera of nine families of dicotyledonous plants (Albert et al. 1992; Ellison & Gotellli 2001; Fleischmann 2012; Rice 2006) (Table 1). In India, a total of five genera of carnivorous plants are reported with 44 species; viz. Utricularia (38 species), Drosera (3), Nepenthes (1), Pinguicula (1), and Aldrovanda (1) (Santapau & Henry 1976; Anonymous 1988; Singh & Sanjappa 2011; Zaman et al. 2011; Kamble et al. 2012). Inter- estingly, northeastern India is the home of all five insectivorous genera, namely Nepenthes (com- monly known as tropical pitcher plant), Drosera (sundew), Utricularia (bladderwort), Aldrovanda (waterwheel plant), and Pinguicula (butterwort) with a total of 21 species. The area also hosts the “ancestral false carnivorous” plant Plumbago zelayanica, often known as murderous plant. Climate Lowland to mid-altitude areas are characterized by subtropical climate (Table 2) with maximum temperatures and maximum precipitation (monsoon) in summer, i.e., May to September (in some places the highest temperatures are reached already in April), and average temperatures usually not dropping below 0°C in winter.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting the Natural Endangered Heritage in Romania, Croatia, Poland and Slovenia
    Available online at http://journals.usamvcluj.ro/index.php/promediu ProEnvironment ProEnvironment 11 (2018) 143-157 Review The Rights of Alive – Protecting the Natural Endangered Heritage in Romania, Croatia, Poland and Slovenia CIOANCĂ Lia-Maria1*, Luminița UJICĂ2, Marijana MIKULANDRA3, Ryszard SOŁTYSIK4, Maja ČERNE5 1Babeș-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca, University Extension Bistrița, Andrei Mureşanu st., no. 3-5, Romania 2High Scool with Sportive Program Bistrița, Calea Moldovei no. 18. Romania 3OŠ Tina Ujevi Osnovna škola Tina Ujevića Koturaška cesta 75 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 4Zespół Szkół Nr1 w Humniskach, 36 – 206, Huminska 264, Poland 5OŠ Rogaška Slatina, Kidričeva ulica 24, 3250 Rogaška Slatina Slovenia Received 23 July 2018; received and revised form 18 September 2018; accepted 25 September 2018 Available online 30 September 2018 Abstract This article deals with the impact of destructive actions of human population on natural world. As a consequence of relying on non-renewable energy sources and reckless encroachment on natural habitats a lot of plant and animal species have become extinct and more and more species are getting endangered. Thus celebrating biodiversity and solidarity for all life forms, from the tiniest one to the most complex eco-systems, has been in the centre of our attention and operational activities. Keywords: durable development, ecology, endangered species. 1. Introduction Within the massive destruction of forests and forest climate, we witness significant changes, Just as the man has passed from the stage of sometimes radical of the environment. For the animal hunter and collector up to animal raiser and farmer, and plants which have survived through a long period the natural vegetation has increasingly been subject of adaptation, a new difficult era starts again.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Carnivorous Plant Newsletter V44 N4 December 2015
    Technical Refereed Contribution Several pygmy Sundew species possess catapult-flypaper traps with repetitive function, indicating a possible evolutionary change into aquatic snap traps similar to Aldrovanda Siegfried R. H. Hartmeyer and Irmgard Hartmeyer • Weil am Rhein • Germany • s.hartmeyer@ t-online.de • www.hartmeyer.de Keywords: Drosera, pygmy Sundew, Aldrovanda, Dionaea, Droseraceae, Collembola, carnivorous plant, catapult-flypaper trap, snap trap, snap-tentacle, functional morphology, phylogeny. Abstract: Approximately 50 species of pygmy Sundews (genus Drosera, section Bryastrum) occur in the South of Australia and one each in New Zealand (D. pygmaea) and Venezuela (D. meristo- caulis). They grow mainly as small stemless rosettes possessing minute trapping leaves of 1-2 mm diameter with prominent marginal tentacles, or have elongated erect stems. The caulescent species possess only mucus-producing tentacles that are most effective in capturing small flying insects. The acaulescent species in contrast are specialized on crawling prey (Verbeek & Boasson 1993) and have developed mucus-free snap-tentacles (Fig. 1), able to bend surprisingly rapidly towards the leaf center. They lift prey like, e.g. springtails (Collembola) from the ground and carry it with a 180°-movement from the periphery of the plant onto the sticky leaf. Our examinations brought to light that several small species of section Bryastrum are able to catapult small animals even within fractions of a second. If the whole leaf is touched, several or even all marginal tentacles perform such bending movements simultaneously. We documented this behavior on video, featured on our film “Catapults in Pygmyland” on YouTube (www.youtube.com/watch?v=5k7GYGibdjM). Our results prove that more than only one species in the genus Drosera possess rapidly moving catapult-flypaper traps and that the examined pygmy catapults show a further specialization and function repeatedly (in contrast to the one-shot snap tentacles of D.
    [Show full text]
  • Insectivorous Plants”, He Showed That They Had Adaptations to Capture and Digest Animals
    the Strange, the Ugly, and the Bizarre . carnivores, parasites, and mycotrophs . Plant Oddities - Carnivores, Parasites & Mycotrophs Of all the plants, the most bizarre, the least understood, but yet the most interesting are those plants that have unusual modes of nutrient uptake. Carnivore: Nepenthes Plant Oddities - Carnivores, Parasites & Mycotrophs Of all the plants, the most bizarre, the least understood, but yet the most interesting are those plants that have unusual modes of nutrient uptake. Parasite: Rafflesia Plant Oddities - Carnivores, Parasites & Mycotrophs Of all the plants, the most bizarre, the least understood, but yet the most interesting are those plants that have unusual modes of nutrient uptake. Things to focus on for this topic! 1. What are these three types of plants 2. How do they live - selection 3. Systematic distribution in general 4. Systematic challenges or issues 5. Evolutionary pathways - how did they get to what they are Mycotroph: Monotropa Plant Oddities - The Problems Three factors for systematic confusion and controversy 1. the specialized roles often involve reductions or elaborations in both vegetative and floral features — DNA also is reduced or has extremely high rates of change for example – the parasitic Rafflesia Plant Oddities - The Problems Three factors for systematic confusion and controversy 2. their connections to other plants or fungi, or trapping of animals, make these odd plants prone to horizontal gene transfer for example – the parasitic Mitrastema [work by former UW student Tom Kleist]
    [Show full text]
  • Carnivorous Plant Newsletter V44 N4 December 2015
    Technical Refereed Contribution Soil pH values at sites of terrestrial carnivorous plants in south-west Europe Lubomír Adamec • Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences • Dukelská 135 • CZ-379 82 Trˇebonˇ • Czech Republic • [email protected] Keywords: Soil water pH, neutral soils, Pinguicula spp., Drosera intermedia, Drosophyllum lusitanicum. Abstract: Although the majority of terrestrial carnivorous plants grow in acidic soils at a pH of 3.5-5.5, there are many dozens of carnivorous species, mostly mountainous or rocky Pinguicula species, which grow preferen- tially or strictly in neutral or slightly alkaline soils at pHs between 7-8. Knowledge of an optimum soil pH value and an amplitude of this factor may be important not only for understanding the ecology of various species and their conservation, but also for successfully growing them. I report soil pH values at microsites of 15 terrestrial carnivorous plant species or subspecies in SW Europe. Introduction The majority of terrestrial carnivorous plants grow in wetlands such as peat bogs, fens, wet meadows, or wet clayish sands. The soils have usually low available mineral nutrient content (N, P, K, Ca, Mg), are hypoxic or anoxic and usually acidic (Juniper et al. 1989; Adamec 1997; Rice 2006). Unlike mineral nutritional character- istics of these soils, which have commonly been studied and related to carnivorous plant growth in the field or greenhouse experiments and which have also been published (for the review see Adamec 1997), relatively very little is known about the relationship between soil pH and growth of terrestrial carnivorous plants. Although some limited knowledge of soil pH at habitats of carnivorous plants or in typical substrates exist among botanists and growers (e.g., Roberts & Oosting 1958; Aldenius et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Online Catalog
    Meadowview Biological Research Station 2010 Catalog $5.00 S. „Craig Rudman‟ pg. 25 Utricularia radiata pg. 37 S. „Caroline‟ pg. 25 Meadowview Biological Research Station 8390 Fredericksburg Tnpk. Woodford, VA 22580 (804) 633-4336 [email protected] www.pitcherplant.org A non-profit 501(c)(3) organization As an incentive to become a Meadowview sponsor, we are offering a 50% dis- count on our plants when you become a sponsor with an annual donation of $25.00 or more. This entitles you to excellent prices on our plants while at the same time supporting our conservation and restoration efforts. Our focus is on the pitcher plant genus Sarracenia but we also offer a number of interesting associate and novelty tropical plants for sale at Meadowview Biological Research Station. All plants are from propagated material. If there are plants you are interested in but do not see in our catalog please ask us. We have limited quantities of many species which are not listed in this cata- log available to those involved in ecological restoration. We have propagated pitcher plant populations of varieties found from Virginia to Texas, which you may be interested in using for your restoration project, depending upon the geographic area. Please inquire as to location and availability of those plants. Feel free to visit our facility by appointment, where you may make your own selections from our stock. Unlike other companies, we ship only mature plants to ensure the highest quality plants and a satisfied customer. We suggest ordering in late winter before plants have started growth to get both the best plants we have avail- able and to ensure that plants have a full season of growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancistrocladaceae
    Soltis et al—American Journal of Botany 98(4):704-730. 2011. – Data Supplement S2 – page 1 Soltis, Douglas E., Stephen A. Smith, Nico Cellinese, Kenneth J. Wurdack, David C. Tank, Samuel F. Brockington, Nancy F. Refulio-Rodriguez, Jay B. Walker, Michael J. Moore, Barbara S. Carlsward, Charles D. Bell, Maribeth Latvis, Sunny Crawley, Chelsea Black, Diaga Diouf, Zhenxiang Xi, Catherine A. Rushworth, Matthew A. Gitzendanner, Kenneth J. Sytsma, Yin-Long Qiu, Khidir W. Hilu, Charles C. Davis, Michael J. Sanderson, Reed S. Beaman, Richard G. Olmstead, Walter S. Judd, Michael J. Donoghue, and Pamela S. Soltis. Angiosperm phylogeny: 17 genes, 640 taxa. American Journal of Botany 98(4): 704-730. Appendix S2. The maximum likelihood majority-rule consensus from the 17-gene analysis shown as a phylogram with mtDNA included for Polyosma. Names of the orders and families follow APG III (2009); other names follow Cantino et al. (2007). Numbers above branches are bootstrap percentages. 67 Acalypha Spathiostemon 100 Ricinus 97 100 Dalechampia Lasiocroton 100 100 Conceveiba Homalanthus 96 Hura Euphorbia 88 Pimelodendron 100 Trigonostemon Euphorbiaceae Codiaeum (incl. Peraceae) 100 Croton Hevea Manihot 10083 Moultonianthus Suregada 98 81 Tetrorchidium Omphalea 100 Endospermum Neoscortechinia 100 98 Pera Clutia Pogonophora 99 Cespedesia Sauvagesia 99 Luxemburgia Ochna Ochnaceae 100 100 53 Quiina Touroulia Medusagyne Caryocar Caryocaraceae 100 Chrysobalanus 100 Atuna Chrysobalananaceae 100 100 Licania Hirtella 100 Euphronia Euphroniaceae 100 Dichapetalum 100
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Lm and Sem Studies of Glandular Trichomes on the Calyx of Flowers of Two Species of Plumbago Linn
    Plant Archives Vol. 17 No. 2, 2017 pp. 948-954 ISSN 0972-5210 COMPARATIVE LM AND SEM STUDIES OF GLANDULAR TRICHOMES ON THE CALYX OF FLOWERS OF TWO SPECIES OF PLUMBAGO LINN. Smita S. Chaudhari and G. S.Chaudhari1 Department of Botany, Dr. A. G. D. Bendale Mahila Mahavidyalaya, Jalgaon (Maharashtra), India. 1P. G. Department of Botany, M. J. College, Jalgaon (Maharashtra), India. Abstract LM and SEM investigation of calyx of flowers of Plumbago zeylanica Linn. and Plumbago auriculata Lam. has shown two types of trichomes-glandular trichomes and unicellular trichomes. Basic structure of glandular trichomes in both taxa is same. Each trichome show multicellular stalk and head. The stalk penetrates the head. Heads of glandular trichomes in Plumbago zeylanica are colourless and translucent but in Plumbago auriculata colourless translucent as well as purple heads are noticed. In Plumbago zeylanica glandular trichomes have higher density, present throughout the length of calyx, distributed in random manner, oriented in different directions, show much more variation in lengths while in Plumbago auriculata glandular trichomes have lower density, present only in the upper part of calyx, arranged in linear fashion, tricomes in one line are oriented in the same direction, show less variation in lengths. EDAX analysis on the head of glandular trichomes of Plumbago zeylanica revealed only C, O, Mg, Al and Si but in Plumbago auriculata in addition to these elements Na, S, Cl, K, Ca, Ti, Fe were also found. Presence of glandular trichomes secreting mucilage (which is considered as adhesive trap for prey) supports the protocarnivorous nature of Plumbago. Key words : Plumbago zeylanica Linn., Plumbago auriculata Lam., glandular trichomes, LM, SEM.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Biogeography of the Carnivorous Plant Family Droseraceae with Representative Drosera Species From
    F1000Research 2017, 6:1454 Last updated: 10 AUG 2021 RESEARCH ARTICLE Phylogeny and biogeography of the carnivorous plant family Droseraceae with representative Drosera species from Northeast India [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 not approved] Devendra Kumar Biswal 1, Sureni Yanthan2, Ruchishree Konhar 1, Manish Debnath 1, Suman Kumaria 2, Pramod Tandon2,3 1Bioinformatics Centre, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, Meghalaya, 793022, India 2Department of Botany, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, Meghalaya, 793022, India 3Biotech Park, Jankipuram, Uttar Pradesh, 226001, India v1 First published: 14 Aug 2017, 6:1454 Open Peer Review https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12049.1 Latest published: 14 Aug 2017, 6:1454 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12049.1 Reviewer Status Invited Reviewers Abstract Background: Botanical carnivory is spread across four major 1 2 angiosperm lineages and five orders: Poales, Caryophyllales, Oxalidales, Ericales and Lamiales. The carnivorous plant family version 1 Droseraceae is well known for its wide range of representatives in the 14 Aug 2017 report report temperate zone. Taxonomically, it is regarded as one of the most problematic and unresolved carnivorous plant families. In the present 1. Andreas Fleischmann, Ludwig-Maximilians- study, the phylogenetic position and biogeographic analysis of the genus Drosera is revisited by taking two species from the genus Universität München, Munich, Germany Drosera (D. burmanii and D. Peltata) found in Meghalaya (Northeast 2. Lingaraj Sahoo, Indian Institute of India). Methods: The purposes of this study were to investigate the Technology Guwahati (IIT Guwahati) , monophyly, reconstruct phylogenetic relationships and ancestral area Guwahati, India of the genus Drosera, and to infer its origin and dispersal using molecular markers from the whole ITS (18S, 28S, ITS1, ITS2) region Any reports and responses or comments on the and ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (rbcL) sequences.
    [Show full text]
  • Aldrovanda Vesiculosa: Friend Or Foe?
    Waterwheel Aldrovanda vesiculosa: Friend or Foe? By Chris Doyle, CLM Restoring Balance. Enhancing Beauty. April 7, 2016 Waterwheel Aldrovanda vesiculosa • Perennial, Free-floating, Rootless Herbaceous Aquatic Plant • Although it looks like a bladderwort: − Family: Droseraceae (sundews) − Most common: The Venus Flytrap (Dionaea muscipula) • Carnivorous • Rare, worldwide • Documented in NJ • 2012 Description • Simple or sparsely-branched Stem – Stem is air-filled to aid in floatation – Stem length varies between four to 20 cm long • Whorls Consist of 4 to 9 Leaves – Up to 23 mm in diameter – Petioles tipped with a single trap (Lamina) Waterwheel Growth • Plant Growth is Strictly Directional • Continual senescence of older whorls at posterior end • Terminal apical bud at anterior end • Maintains near constant length during active growth • Growth Rate is Determined by Many Factors • Biotic, Abiotic, and Water Chemistry Growth and Habitat Factors for Waterwheel Biotic Factors Abiotic Factors • Associated Vegetation • Water Temp. – 30-70% cover is optimal • Water Depth – Bladderworts, Emergent – Minimal for turion overwintering Plants • Irradiance Prey Abundance • – 20% to 60% total sunlight optimal – Zooplankton abundance • pH – 6,000 to 20,000/L optimal – 5.0 to 6.8 seems optimal • Predation • Nutrient Loading • Filamentous algae abundance • Water Chemistry – High free CO2 needed Waterwheel Reproduction • Reduced Capacity to Sexually Reproduce – Typical of most aquatic plants – Sporadic/unpredictable flower production • Warmer climates = inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Plant List
    NON-NATIVE INVASIVE PLANTS OF ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA While up to 40% of the plants found in a typical urban environment are non-native species, a relatively small number of these “alien” plants are known to represent an ecological threat to the natural environment (parks, woodlands, and backyards). Known as “invasive species”, these non-natives will spread from urban plantings into natural areas, eliminate native species, alter natural plant communities, and degrade the environment. The following plants have been documented as invasive species in Arlington. Known invasive plant species should not be planted as part of any Arlington County sponsored project. This list will be periodically reviewed by the Invasive Plant Coordinator (DPR) and updated by Version (date). Invasive Plant Species List Acer spp.: campestre, tataricum var. ginnala Hedge, Amur maple Threat Acer spp.: palmatum, plantanoides, pseudoplatanus Japanese, Norway, Sycamore maple Invasive Actinidia arguta Hardy kiwi Threat Aegopodium podagraria Goutweed Invasive Agrostis capillaris Colonial bent-grass Invasive Ailanthus altissima Tree of Heaven Invasive Akebia quinata Five-leaved akebia Invasive Albizia julibrissin Mimosa Invasive Aldrovanda vesiculosa* Waterwheel Threat Alliaria petiolata Garlic mustard Invasive Alternanthera philoxeroides Alligator weed Invasive Ampelopsis brevipedunculata Porcelainberry Invasive Aralia elata Japanese angelica tree Invasive Artemisia vulgaris Mugwort Invasive Arthraxon hispidus var. hispidus Hairy jointgrass Invasive Arum italicum
    [Show full text]