Revista De Aeronáutica Y Astronáutica Nº 797. Octubre 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Revista De Aeronáutica Y Astronáutica Nº 797. Octubre 2010 Revista de Aeronáutica Y ASTRONÁUTICA NÚMERO 797 OCTUBRE 2010 FARNBOROUGH 2010 No fue un día normal... Aeolus y Swarm, exploradores terrestres AIRSEA BATTLE CONCEPT Sumario Sumario Sumario Sumario Sumario dossier FARNBOROUGH 2010................................................................................. 847 AVIACIÓN CIVIL. YA ESTÁ AQUÍ LA RECUPERACIÓN Por JOSÉ ANTONIO MARTÍNEZ CABEZA, Ingeniero Aeronáutico........................... 848 LA INDUSTRIA EN FARNBOROUGH 2010 Por JULIO CREGO LOURIDO, teniente coronel Ingeniero Aeronáutico .................. 858 EL ARMAMENTO AÉREO EN FARNBOROUGH DESDE EL PUNTO DE VISTA DEL EJÉRCITO DEL AIRE Por FERNANDO ÁLVAREZ SINTES, teniente coronel Ingeniero Aeronáutico ........... 868 EL SOSTENIMIENTO DE SISTEMAS DE ARMAS EN FARNBOROUGH 2010 Por FRANCISCO COLL HERRERO, teniente coronel Ingeniero Aeronáutico ............ 874 Nuestra portada: La exhibición en vuelo del A400M despertó la máxima expectación en Farnborough 2010. Axalp, exhibición aérea en los Alpes suizos Foto: Josué Hernández La localidad suiza de Axalp se ha hecho famosa en el mundo de la aviación ya que 700 metros por encima del lago Brienz, situado en un valle en el corazón de los Alpes suizos y rodeado REVISTA DE de montañas cuyas alturas superan en muchos casos los 2.000 AERONÁUTICA metros sobre el nivel del mar, hay un campo de tiro de la Y ASTRONÁUTICA Fuerza Aérea suiza, donde tiene lugar un festival aéreo único, tanto por su contenido, que incluye además de exhibiciones, NÚMERO 797 prácticas de tiro aire-suelo con cañón, como OCTUBRE 2010 por el entorno natural en el que se lleva a cabo. artículos AIRSEA BATTLE CONCEPT Por JUAN LUIS BAEZA LÓPEZ, comandante de Aviación........................... 824 BATTLE MANAGEMENT. A ESTE LADO DE LA COLINA Por JOSÉ CARLOS PRESA DÍAZ, comandante de Aviación y PEDRO VILAR GARCÍA, sargento 1º especialista en Informática................ 830 NO FUE UN DÍA NORMAL... Por JESÚS RAMOS MUÑOZ, comandante de Aviación............................. 840 –EL SAR REGUESA A GALICIA Por PEDRO MARÍA PASTOR ABAD, sargento 1º de Aviación ................... 842 AXALP, EXHIBICIÓN AÉREA EN LOS ALPES SUIZOS Por ALEJANDRO AFONSO..................................................................... 882 AEOLUS Y SWARM, EXPLORADORES TERRESTRES Por MANUEL MONTES PALACIO ............................................................. 890 secciones Battle Management. Editorial ................................ 807 A este lado de la colina Aviación Militar ..................... 808 El organizador global puede ser el equivalente, Aviación Civil........................ 812 para el comandante táctico, Industria y Tecnología.......... 814 al HUD para el piloto. Espacio ................................ 818 Además, en apenas veinte minutos, cualquiera puede Panorama de la OTAN......... 822 dominar el sistema, Nuestro Museo..................... 896 puesto que los iconos Suboficiales.......................... resuelven el proceso de 898 identificación a mínimos. Noticiario .............................. 900 Para operaciones como El Vigía................................. 910 las evaluaciones tácticas o la gestión diaria de Internet ................................. 912 salidas y procedimientos Recomendamos ................... 914 operativos en una base ¿Sabías que..?..................... 915 aérea, se puede tratar de un concepto de gran ayuda. Bibliografía ........................... 916 REVISTA DE AERONÁUTICA Y ASTRONÁUTICA / Octubre 2010 805 NORMAS DE COLABORACIÓN Pueden colaborar con la Revista de Aeronáutica y Astronáutica toda persona que lo desee, siempre que se atenga a las siguientes normas: Director (en funciones): Comandante: Antonio Mª Alonso Ibáñez [email protected] 1. Los artículos deben tener relación con la Aeronáutica y la Astronáutica, las Fuerzas Armadas, el espíritu militar y, en general, con Consejo de Redacción: Coronel: Santiago Sánchez Ripollés todos los temas que puedan ser de interés para los miembros del Coronel: Pedro Armero Segura Ejército del Aire. Coronel: Joaquín Díaz Martínez Teniente Coronel: Melecio Hernández Quiñones 2. Tienen que ser originales y escritos especialmente para la Revista, Comandante: Miguel A. Orduña Rodríguez Comandante: Casildo L. Martínez Vázquez con estilo adecuado para ser publicados en ella. Comandante: Antonio Mª Alonso Ibáñez [email protected] 3. El texto de los trabajos no puede tener una extensión mayor de Capitán: Juan A. Rodríguez Medina [email protected] OCHO folios de 32 líneas cada uno, que equivalen a unas 3.000 palabras. Aunque los gráficos, fotografías, dibujos y anexos que Secretaria de Redacción: Maite Dáneo Barthe acompañen al artículo no entran en el cómputo de los ocho folios, se [email protected] publicarán a juicio de la Redacción y según el espacio disponible. Los trabajos podrán presentarse indistintamente mecanografiados o SECCIONES FIJAS en soporte informático, adjuntando copia impresa de los mismos. AVIACIÓN MILITAR: General Jesús Pinillos Prieto. AVIACIÓN CIVIL: José Antonio Martínez 4. De los gráficos, dibujos y fotografías se utilizarán aquellos que Cabeza. INDUSTRIA Y TECNOLOGÍA: Teniente Coronel Julio Crego Lourido. ESPACIO: David mejor admitan su reproducción. Corral Hernández. PANORAMA DE LA OTAN: General Federico Yaniz Velasco. NUESTRO 5. Además del título deberá figurar el nombre del autor, así como su MUSEO: Coronel Alfredo Kindelán Camp. domicilio y teléfono. Si es militar, su empleo y destino. SUBOFICIALES: Subteniente Enrique Caballero Calderón. EL VIGÍA: “Canario” Azaola. INTERNET: Teniente Coronel Roberto Plà. 6. Cuando se empleen acrónimos, siglas o abreviaturas, la primera RECOMENDAMOS: Coronel Santiago Sánchez vez tras indicar su significado completo, se pondrá entre paréntesis el Ripollés. ¿SABÍAS QUÉ?: Coronel Emilio acrónimo, la sigla o abreviatura correpondiente. Al final de todo artículo Dáneo Palacios. BIBLIOGRAFÍA: Alcano. podrá indicarse, si es el caso, la bibliografía o trabajos consultados. Preimpresión: Revista de Aeronáutica y Astronáutica 7. No se mantendrá correspondencia sobre los trabajos, ni se Impresión: devolverá ningún original recibido. Centro Cartográfico y Fotográfico del Ejército del Aire 8. Toda colaboración publicada será remunerada de acuerdo con las Número normal ........................................2,10 euros Suscripción anual...................................18,12 euros tarifas vigentes dictadas al efecto para el Programa Editorial del Suscripción Unión Europea...........................38,47 euros Ministerio de Defensa. Suscripción extranjero ...........................42,08 euros IVA incluido (más gastos de envío) 9. Los trabajos publicados representan exclusivamente la opinión SERVICIO HISTÓRICO Y CULTURAL personal de sus colaboradores. DEL EJÉRCITO DEL AIRE INSTITUTO DE HISTORIA Y CULTURA 10. Todo trabajo o colaboración se enviará a: AERONÁUTICAS REVISTA DE AERONÁUTICA REVISTA DE AERONÁUTICA Y ASTRONÁUTICA Y ASTRONÁUTICA Edita Redacción, Princesa, 88. 28008 - MADRID MINISTERIO SECRETARÍA Con objeto de una mejor coordinación de los artículos que se envíen a Revista DE DEFENSA GENERAL TÉCNICA de Aeronáutica y Astronáutica, a partir de ahora se ruega lo hagan a través de la secretaria de redacción: [email protected]. NIPO. 076-10-015-X (edición en papel) NIPO. 076-10-016-5 (edición en línea) LIBRERÍAS Y QUIOSCOS DONDE SE PUEDE ADQUIRIR Depósito M-5416-1960 - ISSN 0034 - 7.647 LA REVISTA DE AERONÁUTICA Y ASTRONÁUTICA Director:..................................91 550 3914 Redacción: .............................91 550 3921 91 550 3922 En ASTURIAS: QUIOSCO JUAN CARLOS (JUAN CARLOS PRIETO). C/ Marqués 91 550 3923 de Urquijo, 18. (Gijón). En BARCELONA: LIBRERÍA AERONÁUTICA L’AEROTECA Suscripciones C/ Monseny, 22. 08012. LIBRERÍA DIDAC (REMEDIOS MAYOR GARRIGA). y Administración: ..................91 550 3925 91 550 3916 C/Vilamero, 90. En BILBAO: LIBRERÍA CAMARA. C/ Euscalduna, 6. En LA Fax: .........................................91 550 3935 RIOJA: LIBRERÍA PARACUELLOS. C/ Muro del Carmen, 2. (Logroño). En LEÓN: KIOSKO CAMPO. Capitán Cortés, 12. 24001. En MURCIA: REVISTAS Princesa, 88 bis - 28008 - MADRID [email protected] MAYOR (Antonio Gomariz). C/ Mayor, 27. (Cartagena). En ZARAGOZA: ESTABLECIMIENTOS ALMER. C/ San Juan de la Cruz, 3. 806 REVISTA DE AERONÁUTICA Y ASTRONÁUTICA / Octubre 2010 Editorial Los primeros pasos L pasado 15 de septiembre daba co- les. Esto permitirá que, a la finalización de mienzo oficialmente un nuevo cur- sus correspondientes planes de estudio, los EE so en la Academia General del Ai- futuros suboficiales del Ejército del Aire re. La presencia del Secretario de Estado obtengan la titulación de grado superior de de la Defensa, del Jefe de Estado Mayor formación profesional, de acuerdo a lo es- del Ejército del Aire y del Rector de la tablecido en la Ley de la Carrera Militar. Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, en- tre otras autoridades, confería una solemni- dad singular a la ceremonia de inaugura- ción. No en vano no sólo empezaba un nue- UESTRO Ejército del Aire es hoy vo curso, sino que se ponía a andar un una Fuerza Aérea moderna y ca- nuevo modelo de enseñanza, que cambia en NN paz, lista para actuar cuándo, algunos aspectos sustanciales lo hecho has- dónde, y cómo sea necesario, al servicio de ta el momento. España y los españoles. Para ello, necesita hombres y mujeres con una excelente for- La Academia General del Aire, desde mación en todos los aspectos, comprometi- 1945, ha ido adaptando sus planes de estu- dos e íntegros, que sean capaces de
Recommended publications
  • Astrobiology in Low Earth Orbit
    The O/OREOS Mission – Astrobiology in Low Earth Orbit P. Ehrenfreund1, A.J. Ricco2, D. Squires2, C. Kitts3, E. Agasid2, N. Bramall2, K. Bryson4, J. Chittenden2, C. Conley5, A. Cook2, R. Mancinelli4, A. Mattioda2, W. Nicholson6, R. Quinn7, O. Santos2, G. Tahu5, M. Voytek5, C. Beasley2, L. Bica3, M. Diaz-Aguado2, C. Friedericks2, M. Henschke2, J.W. Hines2, D. Landis8, E. Luzzi2, D. Ly2, N. Mai2, G. Minelli2, M. McIntyre2, M. Neumann3, M. Parra2, M. Piccini2, R. Rasay3, R. Ricks2, A. Schooley2, E. Stackpole2, L. Timucin2, B. Yost2, A. Young3 1Space Policy Institute, Washington, DC, USA [email protected], 2NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA, 3Robotic Systems Laboratory, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, USA, 4Bay Area Environmental Research Institute, Sonoma, CA, USA, 5NASA Headquarters, Washington DC, USA, 6University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, 7SETI Institute, Mountain View, CA, USA, 8Draper Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, USA Abstract. The O/OREOS (Organism/Organic Exposure to Orbital Stresses) nanosatellite is the first science demonstration spacecraft and flight mission of the NASA Astrobiology Small- Payloads Program (ASP). O/OREOS was launched successfully on November 19, 2010, to a high-inclination (72°), 650-km Earth orbit aboard a US Air Force Minotaur IV rocket from Kodiak, Alaska. O/OREOS consists of 3 conjoined cubesat (each 1000 cm3) modules: (i) a control bus, (ii) the Space Environment Survivability of Living Organisms (SESLO) experiment, and (iii) the Space Environment Viability of Organics (SEVO) experiment. Among the innovative aspects of the O/OREOS mission are a real-time analysis of the photostability of organics and biomarkers and the collection of data on the survival and metabolic activity for micro-organisms at 3 times during the 6-month mission.
    [Show full text]
  • The O/OREOS Mission—Astrobiology in Low Earth Orbit
    Acta Astronautica 93 (2014) 501–508 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Acta Astronautica journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/actaastro The O/OREOS mission—Astrobiology in low Earth orbit P. Ehrenfreund a,n, A.J. Ricco b, D. Squires b, C. Kitts c, E. Agasid b, N. Bramall b, K. Bryson d, J. Chittenden b, C. Conley e, A. Cook b, R. Mancinelli d, A. Mattioda b, W. Nicholson f, R. Quinn g, O. Santos b,G.Tahue,M.Voyteke, C. Beasley b,L.Bicac, M. Diaz-Aguado b, C. Friedericks b,M.Henschkeb,D.Landish, E. Luzzi b,D.Lyb, N. Mai b, G. Minelli b,M.McIntyreb,M.Neumannc, M. Parra b, M. Piccini b, R. Rasay c,R.Ricksb, A. Schooley b, E. Stackpole b, L. Timucin b,B.Yostb, A. Young c a Space Policy Institute, Washington DC, USA b NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA c Robotic Systems Laboratory, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, USA d Bay Area Environmental Research Institute, Sonoma, CA, USA e NASA Headquarters, Washington DC, USA f University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA g SETI Institute, Mountain View, CA, USA h Draper Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, USA article info abstract Article history: The O/OREOS (Organism/Organic Exposure to Orbital Stresses) nanosatellite is the first Received 19 December 2011 science demonstration spacecraft and flight mission of the NASA Astrobiology Small- Received in revised form Payloads Program (ASP). O/OREOS was launched successfully on November 19, 2010, to 22 June 2012 a high-inclination (721), 650-km Earth orbit aboard a US Air Force Minotaur IV rocket Accepted 18 September 2012 from Kodiak, Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation in All Domains. Raytheon in the United Kingdom
    Raytheon in the United Kingdom: Raytheon UK Innovation in all domains. 5th Floor, Harman House 1 George Street Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 1QQ United Kingdom [email protected] www.raytheon.co .uk Cleared for public release. Copyright © 2011 Raytheon Company. All rights reserved. “ Customer Success Is Our Mission” is a registered trademark of Raytheon Company.. “ Raytheon Six Sigma” is a registered trademark of Raytheon Company.. “ Clear View” is a registered trademark of Raytheon Company.. From the Chief Executive Today Raytheon in the UK employs more than In air traffic management, Raytheon in the UK 1,200 people at six sites. Our engineers and has an unbroken heritage stretching back to the scientists are leading the way in designing, first British radar trials in the 1930s. Our developing and manufacturing innovative Monopulse Secondary Surveillance Radar is the solutions for our customers in different industries, most successful radar of its type in the world, with businesses and governments. Raytheon brings to more than 500 systems in service in 43 countries, the UK and Europe proven U.S. technology, and we have a large number of new systems on leveraging established products and skills. order from the U.S. and other countries. We have numerous relationships with industrial and research partners which enable us to play an Continuous development of our people and improvement to our processes ensures that as a BOB DELORGE important role as a major technology exporter to more than 40 countries. business we add operational capability to our Chief Executive & customers and ultimately a competitive advantage Managing Director. Raytheon’s UK operations are recognised for the to British industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Satellite Doldrums
    25 Years of Small Satellites AC4/5 MISSION Siegfried Janson The Aerospace Corporation Presented August 9, 2011 © The Aerospace© The Aerospace Corporation Corporation 2010 2011 Microsatellite Launch History: Last 25 years Microsatellite launch rates rose rapidly in the early 1960’s, and peaked in 1965. Non-Strela microsatellite launch rates hit bottom from 1977 to 1987; the “Small 2 Satellite Doldrums”. They’ve recovered over the past 25 years. Nanosatellite Launch History: About 3 nanosatellites were launched per year during the first decade of space exploration. Launch rates hit zero between 1972 to 1989, but stabilized at ~2 per year 3 through 2002. The CubeSat paradigm has enabled a rapid rise in launch rates. Picosatellite Launch History: Only two active picosatellites were flown before 2000. The Stanford Orbiting Picosatellite Automated Launcher (OPAL) ejected 6 picosatellites into orbit, kicking- st 4 off a 21 century return of picosatellites and the CubeSat Era. Small Satellite Launch History: The First 30 years • The 1960’s: Boom and Bust - Small satellite launch rates rapidly increase in early 1960’s as the Space Age unfolds - Small satellite launch rates decrease in latter half of decade as launch vehicle throw weight capability increases and satellites get bigger (on average). • The 1970’s: Soviet Microsatellites Dominate - Strela-1M constellation deployed; it eventually requires over 300 spacecraft - Western small satellite launch rates continue to decline as satellites grow in size • The 1980’s: Small Satellite Doldrums (1977-1987) - No nanosatellites or picosatellites launched - Less than 5 Western microsatellites launched per year - DARPA initiates LightSat program; holds workshop in 1987 - First AIAA/USU Small Satellite Conference in 1987 - “Doldrums” end in 1987 By 1986, the Soviet Union was actively launching military communications microsatellites, but the rest of the world was experiencing a dearth of new small 5 satellites.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Versiyonu
    ‹Ç‹NDEK‹LER 4 BAfiYAZI / Ardan ZENTÜRK 48 TEKNOLOJ‹ HABER Karadeniz: Siyasetin H›rç›n Yüzü 50 ÖZEL DOSYA / Emre TEK 8 SAVUNMA HABER Havadan Erken ‹hbar ve 18 ÖZEL HABER / Kudret KILIÇ, Ersin ÇAYIR Türkiye Savafl Gemisi ‹nflas›nda M‹LGEM ile S›n›f Atl›yor Kontrol Uçaklar› 24 ANAL‹Z / Sami ATALAN 62 HARP TAR‹H‹ / Prof. Dr. Mesut Hakk› CAfiIN Türk Komutanl›¤› Öncesi Afganistan’da Ortal›k Toz Duman Pasifik Muharebeleri Bölüm IV 28 ANAL‹Z / Kudret KILIÇ 66 DÜNYADAN / Naile ASLAN Orta ‹rtifa Düflmana Yasaklan›yor 68 STRATEJ‹ HABER / Ardan ZENTÜRK 36 ANAL‹Z / Can EREL Teknoloji Yo¤un Havac›l›k Faaliyetlerinin Diktatörlü¤ün Yeni Ad›: Petro-Devlet Konumlanmas› ve Yap›lanmas› Totaliterizm ‹çin “Tipik” Örnek: Özbekistan 42 ÖZEL HABER / Naile ASLAN Azerbaycan’da “Denge Politikas›”n›n Sonuna Do¤ru Afganistan’daki Dengelere Pekin Etkisi Yeni “Berlin Duvar›” Gürcistan’da Örülüyor 44 TSK HABER ‹ran’da Rusya ile Yeni Dönem 46 ÖZEL HABER / Can EREL Yenileflim Etkisinde Havac›l›k Kümeleri ve 74 ANAL‹Z / Burak ÇINAR 1’inci ‹zmir Havac›l›k Konferans› Vietnam Savafl›’nda Hava Muharebeleri ve Kay›plar I Military Science & Intelligence / MSI YAYIN Sorumlu Yaz› ‹flleri Müdürü Foto Muhabiri Genel Yay›n Yönetmeni Dr. A. Poyraz GÜRSON Petek ARICI ZAR‹F Yayg›n Süreli Yay›n [email protected] 2008 Ekim SAYI: 2008 - 036 Ümit BAYRAKTAR YAYIN KURULU [email protected] F›r›n Sok. fieren Apt. No:17/9 www.savunmahaber.com Teflvikiye/fiiflli/‹stanbul-TÜRK‹YE Prof. Dr. Süleyman TOLUN Genel Yay›n Koordinatörü Prof. Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    33333 CUSTOMER SUCCESS At RAYTHEON, everything begins with the customer. Our customers are men and women in uniform, pilots and their passengers, and our partners, in government and industry. Our customers’ success demands our best performance. That means meeting our commitments and being dependable. It’s also forging strong bonds based on the highest ethical behavior. And it’s working as one company to create solutions – the best and most innovative solutions, now and in the future. Customer Success Is Our Mission – and the basis for our growth. ON THE COVER 333 An F-15 fighter pilot prepares to take off. In 2003, F-15C Eagles flew with two improved combat capabilities provided by Raytheon: the first operational airborne Active Electronically Scanned Array radar and the AIM-9X next generation Sidewinder air-to-air missile. GOALS FOR 2004 333 Customer Growth People Productivity WILLIAM H. SWANSON Chairman and CEO DEAR FELLOW SHAREHOLDERS 333 3 Raytheon’s 2003 Annual Report tells the story of a affected by Network Centric Systems and Raytheon Technical company that is well positioned in defense, that has re-base- Services Company, and by increased non-cash pension expense. lined its business aircraft operations to reflect difficult market con- It was positively affected by strong operating performance ditions, that has enjoyed exceptional cash flow performance and in a number of our other Government and Defense businesses. that has put many of its issues behind it. While the company still 33Including the impact of discontinued operations, the com- has work to do, I believe we are focused on the right things and on pany’s net income in 2003 was $0.88 per diluted share compared the right path going forward.
    [Show full text]
  • <> CRONOLOGIA DE LOS SATÉLITES ARTIFICIALES DE LA
    1 SATELITES ARTIFICIALES. Capítulo 5º Subcap. 10 <> CRONOLOGIA DE LOS SATÉLITES ARTIFICIALES DE LA TIERRA. Esta es una relación cronológica de todos los lanzamientos de satélites artificiales de nuestro planeta, con independencia de su éxito o fracaso, tanto en el disparo como en órbita. Significa pues que muchos de ellos no han alcanzado el espacio y fueron destruidos. Se señala en primer lugar (a la izquierda) su nombre, seguido de la fecha del lanzamiento, el país al que pertenece el satélite (que puede ser otro distinto al que lo lanza) y el tipo de satélite; este último aspecto podría no corresponderse en exactitud dado que algunos son de finalidad múltiple. En los lanzamientos múltiples, cada satélite figura separado (salvo en los casos de fracaso, en que no llegan a separarse) pero naturalmente en la misma fecha y juntos. NO ESTÁN incluidos los llevados en vuelos tripulados, si bien se citan en el programa de satélites correspondiente y en el capítulo de “Cronología general de lanzamientos”. .SATÉLITE Fecha País Tipo SPUTNIK F1 15.05.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK F2 21.08.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK 01 04.10.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK 02 03.11.1957 URSS Científico VANGUARD-1A 06.12.1957 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 01 31.01.1958 USA Científico VANGUARD-1B 05.02.1958 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 02 05.03.1958 USA Científico VANGUARD-1 17.03.1958 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 03 26.03.1958 USA Científico SPUTNIK D1 27.04.1958 URSS Geodésico VANGUARD-2A
    [Show full text]
  • IAFF258 Space Launch Tutorial
    THE VALUE OF CUBESATS TO NATIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS Some thoughts for policy makers “1 unit” cubesat and a Mark III P-POD Kirk Woellert, Interorbital Systems UN – ISU SSP 2011 TP Small Satellites TP2 Kirk Woellert, Lewis Groswald1, and Stephanie Wan2 Kirk Woellert1, Pascale Ehrenfreund1, Antonio J. Ricco2, and Henry Hertzfeld1 2Space Studies Board of The National Academies, 1Space Policy Institute, Washington, DC, USA Washington DC, USA 2NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA 3ASRC Research and Technology Solutions (ARTS), USA Kirk Woellert, Interorbital Systems UN – ISU SSP 2011 TP Small Satellites TP2 The Big Picture & national issues Quality of Life Security Energy Economy Healthcare Where does the CubeSat fit in? Kirk Woellert, Interorbital Systems UN – ISU SSP 2011 TP Small Satellites TP2 The Knowledge-Based Economy production, distribution and use of knowledge “Know-how” “Know-what” “Know-why” “Know-who” Science Education Innovation Kirk Woellert, Interorbital Systems UN – ISU SSP 2011 TP Small Satellites TP2 The Big Picture and CubeSats Quality of Life “Knowledge-Based” Economy Science Education Innovation Basic Applied STEM New Research Research Education Business Aerospace Space Technology & Applications Satellites Small Satellites CubeSats Kirk Woellert, Interorbital Systems UN – ISU SSP 2011 TP Small Satellites TP2 SCIENCE Kirk Woellert, Interorbital Systems UN – ISU SSP 2011 TP Small Satellites TP2 Science/Technology Missions(1 of 2) Sampling of completed and proposed nanosatellite science and technology missions Category Mission Sponsor/Lead Agency Status O/OREOS: UV-visible spectral monitoring: organic In progress, Astrobiology materials; space radiation effects on survival/growth of 2 NASA ARC L = 10/2010 microbes CSA/U.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Fires Capabilities for 2025 and Beyond
    Army Fires Capabilities for 2025 and Beyond John Gordon IV, Igor Mikolic-Torreira, D. Sean Barnett, Katharina Ley Best, Scott Boston, Dan Madden, Danielle C. Tarraf, Jordan Willcox C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2124 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9967-9 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: Army photo by Spc. Josselyn Fuentes. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report documents research and analysis conducted as part of a project entitled Army Fires for Army 2025, sponsored by the Field Artil- lery School at Fort Sill, Oklahoma (a part of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Spacecraft Technology State of the Art
    NASA/TP–2015–216648/REV1 Small Spacecraft Technology State of the Art Mission Design Division Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California December 2015 NASA STI Program . in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. to the advancement of aeronautics and space Collected papers from scientific and science. The NASA scientific and technical technical conferences, symposia, seminars, information (STI) program plays a key part or other meetings sponsored or in helping NASA maintain this important co-sponsored by NASA. role. • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, The NASA STI Program operates under the technical, or historical information from auspices of the Agency Chief Information NASA programs, projects, and missions, Officer. It collects, organizes, provides for often concerned with subjects having archiving, and disseminates NASA’s STI. substantial public interest. The NASA STI Program provides access to the NASA Aeronautics and Space Database • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. English- and its public interface, the NASA Technical language translations of foreign scientific Report Server, thus providing one of the and technical material pertinent to largest collection of aeronautical and space NASA’s mission. science STI in the world. Results are Specialized services also include creating published in both non-NASA channels and custom thesauri, building customized by NASA in the NASA STI Report Series, databases, and organizing and publishing which includes the following report types: research results. • TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of For more information about the NASA STI completed research or a major significant Program, see the following: phase of research that present the results of NASA programs and include extensive • Access the NASA STI program home page data or theoretical analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • ISIS: the Military Response in Iraq and Syria
    ISIS: the military response in Iraq and Syria Standard Note: SN/IA/6995 Last updated: 17 October 2014 Author: Louisa Brooke-Holland and Claire Mills Section International Affairs and Defence Section The United States has led airstrikes against ISIS in Iraq and Syria RAF Tornado GR4 aircraft from Cyprus have conducted airstrikes against ISIS in Iraq France, the Netherlands, Belgium and Australia have all conducted air strikes in Iraq and Denmark and Canada have also committed combat aircraft Bahrain, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and the United Arab Emirates have all supported US strikes against ISIS in Syria Combat troops have been explicitly ruled out by the UK and the other the countries involved, amid debate about the reliance on air power alone. However a small number of British soldiers are in Iraq training Peshmerga forces in northern Iraq This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual. It should not be relied upon as being up to date; the law or policies may have changed since it was last updated; and it should not be relied upon as legal or professional advice or as a substitute for it. A suitably qualified professional should be consulted if specific advice or information is required. This information is provided subject to our general terms and conditions which are available online or may be provided on request in hard copy. Authors are available to discuss the content of this briefing with Members and their staff, but not with the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from the F-35 Programme
    Military Innovation and Defence Acquisition: Lessons from the © 2020 IAI F-35 Programme by Niccolò Petrelli ABSTRACT The F-35 was originally conceived as a multirole air superiority/ strike aircraft capable of operating in self-contained ISSN 2610-9603 | ISBN 978-88-9368-120-9 formations, or alone, into hostile airspace. As its development proceeded, however, it proved extremely difficult to overcome the trade-off between low observability, and range and weapons payload. This had a significant impact on the evolution of debates on concepts of operations, leading to a consensus over employing the aircraft as a decentralised node for command & control rather than as originally envisioned. Consequently, requirements for its integration into existing force structures among the programme’s partners have not only changed, but have become more demanding and complex, prompting the need to rethink existing defence acquisition organisation and models. F-35 | Italy | Defence industry | Procurement | Italy’s military policy keywords IAI PAPERS 20 | 01 - JANUARY 2020 20 | 01 - JANUARY IAI PAPERS Military Innovation and Defence Acquisition: Lessons from the F-35 Programme Military Innovation and Defence Acquisition: Lessons from the F-35 Programme by Niccolò Petrelli* © 2020 IAI Introduction What concept has driven development of the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II, and how has this concept affected its capabilities? How have debates about concepts of operations (ConOps) evolved? What are the adoption requirements that the aircraft generates? The study of the F-35’s capabilities, employment and requirements is not only relevant in and of itself but has also implications for scholarship in security and strategic studies and defence policy more broadly.
    [Show full text]