Places, People & Prayers
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Holy Land Itinerary December 16, 2008 - January 1, 2009
Holy Land Itinerary December 16, 2008 - January 1, 2009 December 16: Depart Houston IAH Delta Airlines, 5:55 p.m. via Atlanta to Tel Aviv. December 17: O Wisdom, O Holy Word of God, you govern all creation with your strong yet tender care. Come and show your people the way to salvation. Arrive Tel Aviv 5:25 p.m. Depart by motor coach for Haifa. Mass/Dinner/Accommodations at Carmelite Guest House – Stella Maris. December 18: O Adonai, who showed yourself to Moses in the burning bush, who gave him the holy law on Sinai mountain: come, stretch out your mighty hand to set us free. Mass in Church of the Prophet Elijah’s cave on Mt. Carmel. Depart for Nazareth via Acre, site of Crusader city and castle (Richard the Lion-Hearted) – lunch stop; to Sepphoris to visit an archeological dig of city where Joseph and Jesus may probably have worked (4 miles from Nazareth) to help build one of Herod’s great cities; to Nazareth. Dinner/Accommodations at Sisters of Nazareth Guest House adjacent to the Basilica of the Annunciation and over the probable site of the tomb of St. Joseph. December 19: O Flower of Jesse’s stem, you have been raised up as a sign for all peoples; kings stand silent in your presence; the nations bow down in worship before you. Come, let nothing keep you from coming to our aid. Mass in ancient Grotto of the Annunciation (home of Joachim and Ann); visit Mary’s well, Church of the Nutrition over home of Holy Family, International Marian Center. -
Israel and Judah: 18. Temple Interior and Dedication
Associates for Scriptural Knowledge • P.O. Box 25000, Portland, OR 97298-0990 USA © ASK, March 2019 • All rights reserved • Number 3/19 Telephone: 503 292 4352 • Internet: www.askelm.com • E-Mail: [email protected] How the Siege of Titus Locates the Temple Mount in the City of David by Marilyn Sams, July 2016 Formatted and annotated by David Sielaff, March 2019 This detailed research paper by independent author Marilyn Sams is one of several to follow her 2015 book, The Jerusalem Temple Mount Myth. Her book was inspired by a desire to prove (or disprove) Dr. Ernest Martin’s research in The Temples That Jerusalem Forgot. Ms. Sams wrote a second book in 2017, The Jerusalem Temple Mount: A Compendium of Ancient Descriptions expanding the argument in her first book, itemizing and analyzing 375 ancient descriptions of the Temple, Fort Antonia, and environs, all confirming a Gihon location for God’s Temples.1 Her books and articles greatly advance Dr. Martin’s arguments. David Sielaff, ASK Editor Marilyn Sams: The siege of Titus has been the subject of many books and papers, but always from the false perspective of the Jerusalem Temple Mount’s misidentification.2 The purpose of this paper is to illuminate additional aspects of the siege, in order to show how they cannot reasonably be applied to the current models of the temple and Fort Antonia, but can when the “Temple Mount” is identified as Fort Antonia. Conflicts Between the Rebellious Leaders Prior to the Siege of Titus A clarification of the definition of “Acra” is crucial to understanding the conflicts between John of Gischala and Simon of Giora, two of the rebellious [Jewish] faction leaders, who divided parts of Jerusalem 1 Her second book shows the impossibility of the so-called “Temple Mount” and demonstrate the necessity of a Gihon site of the Temples. -
CGS Newsletter
Preparing for Easter at Home as a Family Listening to God with Children during Holy Week As a family, we can prepare spiritually and physically by listening to and reflecting upon the Word of God together with our children. Most interestingly, without the sacraments - the bread and wine - we contemplate on the Word of God, discovering more earnestly how God comes to be with us through the Word. To enter more deeply into Easter preparation, we transport ourselves to the historical place and time of the Paschal Mystery, before bringing our focus on the Holy Triduum. Biblical Geography: The Land of Israel City of Jerusalem. The children in the Material at Home. Find a physical map from a Atrium are initiated into the geography of biblical atlas or a virtual map of Israel online. Israel, focusing on its principal cities. During Lent, we deep-dive into the city of The Holy Land Model of Jerusalem (official site) Jerusalem and important places that tell or see a video overview here. This is a 1:50 us about Jesus' final days on earth with three-dimensional scale model of the city of His disciples. Jerusalem in the Second Temple Period. City of Jerusalem Map You may print this for the children to colour in and refer to while reading scripture. After looking at how the city was laid out, with its walls and its grand Temple, we then name and look more closely at the places where Jesus walked, giving children only a brief description. We focus on the location of: (1) the Cenacle, (2) the house of Caiaphas, (3) the Antonia Tower, (4) the Garden of Olives, (5) Calvary and (6) the tomb of the resurrection (RPC1, p. -
1 Where Is Calvary? Mark 15:22 / 9-20-17 / Wed
1 WHERE IS CALVARY? MARK 15:22 / 9-20-17 / WED INTRODUCTION A. All four gospels give the name of the place Jesus was crucified. 1. Three call it “Golgotha”—Mark 15:22 (Matt. 27:33; John 19:17) 2. All four say it was “the place of the skull.” a. “Golgotha” is an Aramaic word for “a bare skull”. b. Our English version is a transliteration of this Aramaic word. Cleve Haley ! 9/19/2017 6:25 AM c. Only Luke calls it “Calvary” in the KJV.—Luke 23:33 KJV Comment [1]: B. What other clues does the Bible give? 1. First, it was outside the city—John 19:20 and Hebrews 13:12. 2. Second, it was near a well-traveled road—Matt. 27:39; Mark 15:21, 29-30. 3. Third, it was probably on a hill because it was visible from a distance—Mark 15:40. 4. Fourth, it was near a garden that had a new tomb—John 19:41. I. THE TRADITIONAL SITE IS THE CHURCH OF THE HOLY SEPULCHRE. A. This church has a long standing tradition dating back to the time of Constantine, the first Roman Emperor to profess Christianity (A.D. 325). B. According to that tradition, Constantine sent his mother, Helena, to Jerusalem in A.D. 326 to locate holy sites of the Christian faith. C. In 135 A.D. Christians in Judea revolted against Roman rule. The Emperor at that time was Hadrian. He subsequently ordered a temple to Venus also known as Aphrodite be built over Golgotha. -
Boundaries, Barriers, Walls
1 Boundaries, Barriers, Walls Jerusalem’s unique landscape generates a vibrant interplay between natural and built features where continuity and segmentation align with the complexity and volubility that have characterized most of the city’s history. The softness of its hilly contours and the harmony of the gentle colors stand in contrast with its boundar- ies, which serve to define, separate, and segregate buildings, quarters, people, and nations. The Ottoman city walls (seefigure )2 separate the old from the new; the Barrier Wall (see figure 3), Israelis from Palestinians.1 The former serves as a visual reminder of the past, the latter as a concrete expression of the current political conflict. This chapter seeks to examine and better understand the physical realities of the present: how they reflect the past, and how the ancient material remains stimulate memory, conscious knowledge, and unconscious perception. The his- tory of Jerusalem, as it unfolds in its physical forms and multiple temporalities, brings to the surface periods of flourish and decline, of creation and destruction. TOPOGRAPHY AND GEOGRAPHY The topographical features of Jerusalem’s Old City have remained relatively con- stant since antiquity (see figure ).4 Other than the Central Valley (from the time of the first-century historian Josephus also known as the Tyropoeon Valley), which has been largely leveled and developed, most of the city’s elevations, protrusions, and declivities have maintained their approximate proportions from the time the city was first settled. In contrast, the urban fabric and its boundaries have shifted constantly, adjusting to ever-changing demographic, socioeconomic, and political conditions.2 15 Figure 2. -
PSALM 16: Gethsemane, Gabbatha, Golgotha, the “Garden Tomb,” and the Glory
PSALM 16: Gethsemane, Gabbatha, Golgotha, the “Garden Tomb,” and the Glory Gordon Franz Introduction On occasions I teach a class on Christian Apologetics. The first assignment I give the students is to read through the entire Book of Acts and note each encounter that believers in the Lord Jesus Christ have with the unsaved in the book. The students are to make a list with: (1) the Christians who are doing the witnessing, (2) the unbelievers bring witnessed to, (3) what the apologetics are that the believers are using, (4) and what the response of the unsaved is to their message. The two main apologetics used by the Early Church in the Book of Acts are: first, the bodily resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ; and second, the fulfillment of Bible prophecy. Psalm 16 is quoted on two occasions in the Book of Acts in order to demonstrate that the bodily resurrection of the Lord Jesus was the fulfillment of this psalm, predicted almost a thousand years before it happened. The first time the psalm is quoted is in Acts 2, Peter’s sermon on the day of Shavuot (Pentecost). The second time it is quoted is in Acts 13 when the Apostle Paul preached in the synagogue of Psidia Antioch on his first missionary journey. Superscription The superscription of Psalm 16 reads, michtam le David. The verbal root for the word “michtam” is to inscribe, to engrave, or write, like on a stele. One gets the impression of an inscription on a victory stele. A stele is an upright stone slab or pillar that has an inscription or some kind of design on it that serves as a monument for propaganda purposes or for veneration. -
Xbulletin-May 28 2017
First Communion Class of 2017 St. Bernadette Catholic Church St. Bernadette Catholic Church May 28, 2017 350 NW California Boulevard, Port St. Lucie, FL 34986 Page 2 Dear Friends, Where the Lord has gone, we hope to follow. These words summarize today’s Solemnity of the MONDAY, MAY 29, 2017 Ascension of the Lord into Heaven. 8:00 am †Jean Martino, requested by loving son, Ric As much as the Disciples witnessing the event (and we too, for that matter) naturally lift our TUESDAY, MAY 30, 2017 heads to try to catch a glimpse of the Lord as He 8:00 am †Lillian Tulumello, requested by disappears into the clouds, we must spend our Mary Ann & Warren Evensen lives preparing to ascend to our God as well. As WEDNESDAY, MAY 31, 2017 Matthew Leonard once said, we are either 8:00 am †Miriam Foppe, requested by spending our lives going up or going down. Bob & Family Prayer, Eucharistic Adoration, practicing the THURSDAY, JUNE 1, 2017 Corporal and Spiritual Works of Mercy, in other 8:00 am †Betty Hartley, requested by words, being good stewards of God’s gifts, help us Richard & Barbara Jaworski do what we can to be lifted up and follow the Lord Jesus into His Kingdom, into the arms of our FRIDAY, JUNE 2, 2017 Heavenly Father. 8:00 am †Deceased members of the Benedict Family, requested by May today’s Ascension further deepen our Suresh & Angeline Desai prayer for the Holy Spirit to come upon us, next SATURDAY, JUNE 3, 2017 week on Pentecost and every day of our lives! 8:00 am †Mario Aday, requested by Martha Gil Have a wonderful week! 4:00 pm †Henry & Jeanne Archambault, Father Victor Ulto, Pastor requested by Ken & Jeannine Anderson SUNDAY, JUNE 4, 2017 7:30 am †Mary & Martin Healy, requested by granddaughter, Kathy 9:00 am For the People of the Parish 10:45 am †Dionisio & Zoila Suarez, requested by their son Today, Sunday, May 28 is the last weekend for the 12:15 pm Mass. -
A Different Location for the Cenacle by Roberto Raciti
A Different Location for the Cenacle by Roberto Raciti While reading Blessed Emmerich’s description of the Last Supper and the Cenacle, I realized that the true location of this place was somehow different from what is today generally accepted. This is not the only place which might be wrongly located, as I believe there are others, such as the true location of Mount Sinai. I compared the information contained in the book “The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ”, as the main source, as well as the Gospels. I also found what I believe to be the first mention of the House of the Last Supper in the Old Testament. First, let’s have a look at a map of ancient Jerusalem: I indicated the widely accepted location of the Cenacle in red, and Emmerich’s location in blue. As you can see, the new proposed location is located inside what once used to be David’s citadel on Mount Zion; this is much closer to the valley of Josaphat, and the Mount of Olives. This is what Emmerich tells us about the Cenacle: “The disciples had already asked Jesus where he would eat the Pasch. Today, before dawn, our Lord sent for Peter, James, and John, spoke to them at some length concerning all they had to prepare and order at Jerusalem and told them that when ascending Mount Sion, they would meet the man carrying a pitcher of water.” First, we must establish what Blessed Emmerich means by “Mount Sion”. Jerusalem has at least three prominent mounts, one is the Temple Mount, sometimes also called Mount Moriah or Araunah’s threshing floor. -
12. BIBLICAL EPIC: 2 Kings Notes
12. BIBLICAL EPIC: 2 Kings Notes rown 2 Kings 1: Ahaziah consulted Baal-zebub. Elijah said that he would die. Ahaziah sent men to Elijah but they were consumed by fire. Ahaziah died. • 1:1-18. Elijah Denounces Ahaziah. Like his father Ahab, Ahaziah is destined to meet Elijah. The occasion for their confrontation is an injury sustained by the king when falling out of a window of his upper chamber in Samaria. Ahaziah seeks not the God of Israel but a deity of one of the Philistine cities 40 miles southwest of Samaria. The author probably changes Baal-Zebul (“Baal the prince”) to Baal-Zebub (“lord of the flies”) to express scorn for this false deity. By NT times, the name of this god is associated with Satan (Mark 3:22). As is common throughout 1-2 Kings, the LORD sends His prophet to confront the king for idolatry and Elijah announces that Ahaziah will die. Ahaziah showed the same unbelieving pragmatism his father Ahab had when Ahab looked for a prophet who would give him the answer he wanted. The prophetic word, however, cannot be brought under human control, and the God of Mount Carmel sends fire from heaven to underline this fact. Two “lords” vie for worship throughout the Elijah story (Baal and Yahweh), both of them identified with fire—and Ahaziah has chosen the wrong one. Here 100 soldiers die as a result of Ahaziah’s choice to turn from God, again showing that the sins of leaders often lead to tragic consequences for those whom they lead. -
The Upper Kidron Valley
Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies Founded by the Charles H. Revson Foundation The Upper Kidron Valley Conservation and Development in the Visual Basin of the Old City of Jerusalem Editor: Israel Kimhi Jerusalem 2010 Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies – Study No. 398 The Upper Kidron Valley Conservation and Development in the Visual Basin of the Old City of Jerusalem Editor: Israel Kimhi This publication was made possible thanks to the assistance of the Richard and Rhoda Goldman Fund, San Francisco. 7KHFRQWHQWRIWKLVGRFXPHQWUHÀHFWVWKHDXWKRUV¶RSLQLRQRQO\ Photographs: Maya Choshen, Israel Kimhi, and Flash 90 Linguistic editing (Hebrew): Shlomo Arad Production and printing: Hamutal Appel Pagination and design: Esti Boehm Translation: Sagir International Translations Ltd. © 2010, The Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies Hay Elyachar House 20 Radak St., Jerusalem 92186 http://www.jiis.org E-mail: [email protected] Research Team Israel Kimhi – head of the team and editor of the report Eran Avni – infrastructures, public participation, tourism sites Amir Eidelman – geology Yair Assaf-Shapira – research, mapping, and geographical information systems Malka Greenberg-Raanan – physical planning, development of construction Maya Choshen – population and society Mike Turner – physical planning, development of construction, visual analysis, future development trends Muhamad Nakhal ±UHVLGHQWSDUWLFLSDWLRQKLVWRU\SUR¿OHRIWKH$UDEQHLJKERU- hoods Michal Korach – population and society Israel Kimhi – recommendations for future development, land uses, transport, planning Amnon Ramon – history, religions, sites for conservation Acknowledgments The research team thanks the residents of the Upper Kidron Valley and the Visual Basin of the Old City, and their representatives, for cooperating with the researchers during the course of the study and for their willingness to meet frequently with the team. -
The Garden Tomb Has Been Owned by a Non- the Garden Tomb (Jerusalem) Association, Denominational Christian Trust Since 1894
This Garden fits many of the details Welcome to described in the gospel accounts. At the very least it is a beautiful visual aid that ILL THE helps bring to life the wonderful events H surrounding the Messiah’s resurrection. KULL GARDEN While we do not know for certain where S these events occurred, we have faith in him "who was declared with power to be the TOMB Son of God by his resurrection from the dead, according to the spirit of holiness, Jesus Christ our Lord." (Romans 1:4) “Christ has been raised from the dead, the CCESSABILITY AMPS R first fruits of those who have died... so that A all will be made alive in Christ... The last enemy to be destroyed is death... so that God may be ALL IN ALL.” ISTERN (1 Corinthians 15:20, 22, 26, 28) C We do not charge for RESS P admission to the Garden. It is maintained by the INE This garden has been carefully maintained as voluntary contributions of W a place of Christian worship, witness, and reflection on the life, death and resurrection of visitors like you. Jesus the Messiah. Many believe this to be the ESTROOMS garden in which Jesus of Nazareth was buried R and where he rose from the dead. The garden is owned and administered by The Garden Tomb has been owned by a non- the Garden Tomb (Jerusalem) Association, denominational Christian trust since 1894. We a charitable trust based in the United Kingdom make no dogmatic claims about the historical (charity 1144197) and in Israel (R.A. -
The Temple Mount/Haram Al-Sharif – Archaeology in a Political Context
The Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif – Archaeology in a Political Context 2017 March 2017 Table of contents >> Introduction 3 Written by: Yonathan Mizrachi >> Part I | The history of the Site: How the Temple Mount became the 0 Researchers: Emek Shaveh Haram al-Sharif 4 Edited by: Talya Ezrahi >> Part II | Changes in the Status of the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif 0 Proof-editing: Noa Granot from the 19th century to the Present Day 7 Graphic Design: Lior Cohen Photographs: Emek Shaveh, Yael Ilan >> Part III | Changes around the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif and the 0 Mapping: Lior Cohen, Shai Efrati, Slava Pirsky impact on the Status Quo 11 >> Conclusion and Lessons 19 >> Maps 20 Emek Shaveh (cc) | Email: [email protected] | website www.alt-arch.org Emek Shaveh is an Israeli NGO working to prevent the politicization of archaeology in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and to protect ancient sites as public assets that belong to members of all communities, faiths and peoples. We view archaeology as a resource for building bridges and strengthening bonds between peoples and cultures. This publication was produced by Emek Shaveh (A public benefit corporation) with the support of the IHL Secretariat, the Federal Department for Foreign Affairs Switzerland (FDFA) the New Israeli Fund and CCFD. Responsibility for the information contained in this report belongs exclu- sively to Emek Shaveh. This information does not represent the opinions of the above mentioned donors. 2 Introduction Immediately after the 1967 War, Israel’s then Defense Minister Moshe Dayan declared that the Islamic Waqf would retain their authority over the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif compound.