DOCSLIB.ORG

The French and Indian War England and France Both Had Extensive Land Claims in North America

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The French and Indian War England and France Both Had Extensive Land Claims in North America The French and Indian War England and France both had extensive land claims in North America. Both countries claimed the Ohio Valley territory as their own. In the 1750’s, the French sent troops to occupy the Ohio Valley. They built several forts west of the Appalachians to show that they planned to remain in the Ohio Valley to protect their land. One of the most famous forts was called Fort Duquesne. A young George Washington, a Colonel in the British Army, led 150 British militiamen to capture Fort Duquesne. Washington and his men were outnumbered and soon defeated by the French. The French sent Washington and his men back to British commanders with a message that the Ohio Valley belonged to the French. The British didn’t give up easily. They returned to Fort Duquesne with more troops. The British, as was their custom, marched in straight lines with much noise and fanfare. The French and their Indian allies hid behind rocks and trees. They fired on the British troops from their hiding places. The British were again defeated. The British did have some assistance from Native American groups. However, this assistance was not enough to help them defeat the French right away. The British continued to fight the French but mostly to the north, in Canada. The French were finally defeated and signed the Treaty of Paris in 1763. In this treaty, the French surrendered all of their land claims in North America. Ohio Valley Made with Love by: Jenifer Bazzit The Proclamation of 1763 A Proclamation is defined as “an official statement or announcement made by a person in power.” As a result of the French and Indian War, the British drove the French out of North America. The British knew that the help they had received from Native Americans had helped them win the war. Native Americans made it clear that they were worried about the constant stream of new settlers into the west, past the Appalachian Mountains. To calm the fears of the Native Americans, King George III of England issued a royal proclamation. This proclamation was known as The Proclamation of 1763. It forbid colonists from settling west of the Appalachian Mountains. King George III and Parliament were hoping that this proclamation would satisfy the Native Americans and reduce future Indian attacks. The Proclamation of 1763 angered the colonists. They argued that this new law showed that King George III of England was on the side of the Indians. Many colonists had already moved past the Proclamation Line and were not willing to give up their land and the settlements they had already created. The Proclamation of 1763 ultimately failed because of these reasons. = Proclamation Line of 1763 Made with Love by: Jenifer Bazzit The Sugar Act In 1764, the British Parliament passed the Sugar Act. This was a British law meant to raise money in the American Colonies. When this law began, England started to tax the colonists three pence per pound of sugar. Three pence was not much money at all, however, this new tax greatly angered colonists. The Sugar Act was the first direct tax that Parliament imposed on the American Colonies. England’s debt had grown considerably after the French and Indian War. Many in England argued that it was only fair that the colonists help pay for the French and Indian War because it was fought to protect colonial borders. While colonists were not particularly happy about paying the extra three pence per pound tax, they were more upset about a larger issue. There was no representation for the colonies in the British Parliament. The colonists argued that Parliament passed laws to tax them without giving them a voice or vote in Parliament. “No Taxation without Representation” was a new phrase heard throughout the colonies. Made with Love by: Jenifer Bazzit The Stamp Act After the French and Indian War, England sent troops to remain in the colonies to defend against Indian attacks and to prevent the French from trying to reclaim the land they had lost. Many people in England believed that the colonies should pay to help support these troops. After all, they were there to help the colonists. To support these troops, the British Parliament passed the Stamp Act in 1765. The Stamp Act required that a stamp purchased from the British government be placed on all important documents, such as court papers, almanacs, pamphlets, newspapers, and even playing cards. This special stamp showed that the tax had been paid on the paper item. The Stamp Act caused anger and resentment among the colonists. First, colonists were outraged that the British troops were stationed in the colonies at all AND that they had to pay for their upkeep. Second, colonists believed it was unfair to tax them when they had no representation in Parliament. Representatives from nine colonies met in New York City in 1765 in a meeting called the Stamp Act Congress. They declared that the colonies should not be taxed by Parliament. The only taxation they would accept would have to come from the assemblies elected by colonists themselves. Ships arriving from England carrying the stamps were met by mobs who destroyed the stamps. Some ship captains were forced to return to England with the stamps. The resistance of the colonists to use the stamps caused many businesses to be unable to operate. Parliament repealed the Stamp Act in March 1766. One penny stamp used under the Stamp Act of 1765 Made with Love by: Jenifer Bazzit Committees of Correspondence In the 1760’s and 1770’s, communication between towns and colonies took weeks. Sometimes people in other colonies never heard news at all. Samuel Adams, leader of the patriot rebel group, the Sons of Liberty, founded the first Committee of Correspondence. Many more committees were quickly formed throughout the colonies. The aim of these committees was to share information about each new issue faced in the developing crisis with England. The Committees of Correspondence were the first attempt of the American Colonies to maintain communication with one another. This communication helped to form bonds among the thirteen colonies that would help them later cooperate in the American Revolution. The relationship between the colonies and England was falling apart quickly. Eventually, each of the thirteen colonies formed a Committee of Correspondence to send out information and news about what their colony was doing to resist the British and end their unfair policies. Made with Love by: Jenifer Bazzit The Townshend Acts In 1767, the British Parliament passed several laws called the Townshend Acts. These laws were designed to help England raise money to cover the costs of the French and Indian War. The Townshend Acts were also a way to show that England had power over the colonies. They needed to reinforce their authority because their earlier attempt at taxing the colonists, the Stamp Act, had failed. The Townshend Acts placed taxes on items imported to the colonies from England, such as paper, glass, paint, and tea. The colonial assemblies could do very little to protest the new taxes and they had no representation in Parliament. Colonists did protest the Townshend Acts by holding public demonstrations to complain about the taxes. Colonists boycotted imports from England. This cost merchants in England a lot of money. Parliament decided to repeal, or cancel, the Townshend Acts in 1770 due to pressure from the colonies and from the British merchants who were losing money daily. All of the taxes were cancelled except for the tax on tea. Made with Love by: Jenifer Bazzit The Boston Massacre Tensions between England and the American Colonies were very high. Tensions in the city of Boston, Massachusetts were especially high. British soldiers had been occupying the city against the colonists’ wishes. There had been several small clashes between British soldiers and angry colonists in the months preceding the Boston Massacre. On March 5, 1770, a crowd of colonists confronted eight British soldiers on the streets of Boston. The colonists insulted and threatened the soldiers. Some of the colonists provoked the soldiers by throwing snowballs, sticks and stones, and calling them “lobster scoundrels.” When one soldier was hit by a flying object, he fired his musket, purposely or accidentally, we will never know. Although the British soldiers’ captain continued to yell, “Hold your fire,” several muskets were fired into the crowd. When the smoke cleared, five colonists lay dead and many more were seriously injured. John Adams, an outspoken patriot, defended the soldiers in court. He argued that the soldiers were provoked into firing into the group of colonists. Six of the soldiers were found not guilty. Two of the soldiers were allowed to go free after being branded on the thumbs for the crime of manslaughter. The Boston Massacre was certainly not a “massacre.” A true massacre is defined as “the violent killing of many people.” Colonial patriots used this event as propaganda to get more colonists on their side. When people in faraway colonies began to hear of the “out of control” British soldiers, support for the patriot cause and resistance of the British skyrocketed. Made with Love by: Jenifer Bazzit The Tea Act/Boston Tea Party The Tea Act was passed by Parliament in 1773. This new tax law was not designed to raise taxes in the colonies. The Tea Act was created to help the East India Company. The company was having great financial difficulty and had 18 million pounds of unsold tea. England allowed the East India Company to ship this tea to the colonies for sale.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Finance (No. 3) Bill
    Finance (No. 3) Bill EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS The Chancellor of the Exchequer has made the following statement under section 19(1)(a) of the Human Rights Act 1998: In my view the provisions of the Finance (No. 3) Bill are compatible with the Convention rights. Bill 282 57/1 Finance (No. 3) Bill CONTENTS PART 1 DIRECT TAXES Charge to tax 1 Income tax charge for tax year 2019-20 2 Corporation tax charge for financial year 2020 Income tax rates, allowances and limits 3 Main rates of income tax for tax year 2019-20 4 Default and savings rates of income tax for tax year 2019-20 5 Basic rate limit and personal allowance 6 Starting rate limit for savings for tax year 2019-20 Employment and social security income 7 Optional remuneration arrangements: arrangements for cars and vans 8 Exemption for benefit in form of vehicle-battery charging at workplace 9 Exemptions relating to emergency vehicles 10 Exemption for expenses related to travel 11 Beneficiaries of tax-exempt employer-provided pension benefits 12 Tax treatment of social security income Chargeable gains: interests in UK land etc 13 Disposals by non-UK residents etc 14 Disposals of UK land etc: payments on account of capital gains tax International matters 15 Offshore receipts in respect of intangible property 16 Avoidance involving profit fragmentation arrangements 17 Non-UK resident companies carrying on UK property businesses etc 18 Diverted profits tax 19 Hybrid and other mismatches: scope of Chapter 8 and “financial instrument” 20 Controlled foreign companies: finance company exemption and control Bill 282 57/1 ii Finance (No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stamp Act and Methods of Protest
    Page 33 Chapter 8 The Stamp Act and Methods of Protest espite the many arguments made against it, the Stamp Act was passed and scheduled to be enforced on November 1, 1765. The colonists found ever more vigorous and violent ways to D protest the Act. In Virginia, a tall backwoods lawyer, Patrick Henry, made a fiery speech and pushed five resolutions through the Virginia Assembly. In Boston, an angry mob inspired by Sam Adams and the Sons of Liberty destroyed property belonging to a man rumored to be a Stamp agent and to Lt. Governor Thomas Hutchinson. In New York, delegates from nine colonies, sitting as the Stamp Act Congress, petitioned the King and Parliament for repeal. In Philadelphia, New York, and other seaport towns, merchants pledged not to buy or sell British goods until the hated stamp tax was repealed. This storm of resistance and protest eventually had the desired effect. Stamp sgents hastily resigned their Commissions and not a single stamp was ever sold in the colonies. Meanwhile, British merchants petitioned Parliament to repeal the Stamp Act. In 1766, the law was repealed but replaced with the Declaratory Act, which stated that Parliament had the right to make laws binding on the colonies "in all cases whatsoever." The methods used to protest the Stamp Act raised issues concerning the use of illegal and violent protest, which are considered in this chapter. May: Patrick Henry and the Virginia Resolutions Patrick Henry had been a member of Virginia's House of Burgess (Assembly) for exactly nine days as the May session was drawing to a close.
    [Show full text]
  • IBMYP United States Government the Stamp Act – Background
    IBMYP United States Government denied these charges, and complained of British suspect that the British were intentionally plotting The Stamp Act – Background arrogance and contemptuousness in dealings with to enslave the colonists economically. the colonials. Commentary The French and Indian War – Results British troops also quarreled with colonial civilians, Summary who were often reluctant to provide food and The conflict between British and colonial soldiers shelter to the British, and consistently complained was indicative of the evolving attitudes of the two When the French and Indian War, and its of the troops' poor behavior. Pennsylvania regions toward one another. The colonies began European counterpart, the Seven Years War, Quakers, as pacifists, voted against appropriating to associate all things British with arrogance and officially came to a close with the Treaty of Paris in funds for the war effort, and Massachusetts and condescension, and the British viewed Americans 1763, North America was divided territorially New York also took a stand against the quartering as inept, irresponsible, and primitive. The colonial between the British and Spanish. Britain had of British troops in their colonies. British units in the war were involved primarily in support driven the French from the continent, and Parliament, and King George III, viewed these roles, providing reserve forces in battles and extended its land claims west to the Mississippi actions as antagonistic to the British effort to holding British forts. This way, the more highly River. It seemed that British holdings in North defend imperial territories. trained British professionals could lead the America and all over the world were more secure offensive against the French.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stamp Act Rebellion
    The Stamp Act Rebellion Grade Level: George III (1738-1820) From the “Encyclopedia of Virginia,” this biographical profile offers an overview of the life and achievements of George III during his fifty-one-year reign as king of Great Britain and Ireland. The personal background on George William Frederick includes birth, childhood, education, and experiences growing up in the royal House of Hanover. King George’s responses to events during the Seven Years’ War, the Irish Rebellion, and the French Revolution are analyzed with the help of historical drawings and documents. A “Time Line” from 1663 through 1820 appears at the end. Topic: George III, King of Great Britain, Great Britain--History--18th Language: English Lexile: 1400 century, Great Britain--Politics and government, England--Social life and customs URL: http://www.encyclopediavirginia.org Grade Level: Stamp Act Crisis In 1766, Benjamin Franklin testified to Parliament about the Stamp Act and a month later it was repealed. The Stamp Act sparked the first widespread eruption of anti-British resistance. The primary source documents at this web site will help you understand why Parliament passed the tax and why so many Americans opposed it. The documents show the colonists' first widespread resistance to British authority and how they responded to their first victory in the revolutionary era. Discussion questions are included. Topic: Stamp Act (1765) Language: English Lexile: 1320 URL: http://americainclass.org Grade Level: American History Documents The online presence of the Indiana University's Lilly Library includes the virtual exhibition American History Documents. Complemented by enlargeable images of items from the library's actual collection, this site includes two entries related to the Stamp Act of 1765: the cover pages from An Act for Granting and Applying Certain Stamp Duties and Other Duties, in the British Colonies and Plantations in America, London and New Jersey.
    [Show full text]
  • WEST INDIES Why Did the British West Indies Fail to Support the American Revolt?
    WEST INDIES Why did the British West Indies fail to support the American revolt? Viewpoint: The British West Indies were far too dependent on the mother country economically, socially, and militarily to join the American War of Inde- pendence. Viewpoint: The white inhabitants of the British Caribbean had more conserva- tive views of the English constitution and Empire than those held by Americans. Great Britain possessed twenty-six colonies in the Americas, but only the thirteen mainland colonies rebelled against the mother country in 1775. Why? The refusal of the British West Indies to support the American rebel- lion is puzzling, especially considering that the sugar islands had close social and economic ties with the mainland colonies and shared many of the essential preconditions of the American Revolution (1775-1783). As early as 1651, for example, Barbadians denied Parliament's right to tax them on the grounds that legislation without representation was a violation of their rights as Englishmen. Thirty years later Jamaica's assembly suc- cessfully established its right to legislate in all domestic matters. Like their mainland counterparts, the island colonists during the eighteenth century sought increasing control over internal taxation, the local militia, the islands' defenses, the administering of governmental expenditures, the appointment of local officials, and the executive-decision-making process. The republi- can ideology of the American Revolution and Britain's attempt to subdue the Americans by force intensified these political contests and created a politi- cal and constitutional crisis on some Caribbean islands. Local assemblies made claims of coequality with the House of Commons and usurped execu- tive powers, while some island colonists refused to pay taxes and perse- cuted government officials determined to uphold the Crown's prerogative.
    [Show full text]
  • Events Leading up to the American Revolution the French and Indian War (1754-63) War Fought Between Great Britain and Its Two E
    Events leading up to the American Revolution The French and Indian War (1754-63) War fought between Great Britain and its two enemies, the French and the Indians of North America. Most of the battles were in Canada. American colonists, including George Washington, fought with the British in this war, which lasted from 1754 to 1763. The British won the war and won the right to keep Canada and several other possessions in the New World. The Sugar Act (4/5/1764) 1764 Act that put a three-cent tax on foreign refined sugar and increased taxes on coffee, indigo, and certain kinds of wine. It banned importation of rum and French wines. These taxes affected only a certain part of the population, but the affected merchants were very vocal. Besides, the taxes were enacted (or raised) without the consent of the colonists. This was one of the first instances in which colonists wanted a say in how much they were taxed The Stamp Act (3/22/1765) First direct British tax on American colonists. Instituted in November, 1765. Every newspaper, pamphlet, and other public and legal document had to have a Stamp, or British seal, on it. The Stamp, of course, cost money. The colonists didn't think they should have to pay for something they had been doing for free for many years, and they responded in force, with demonstrations and even with a diplomatic body called the Stamp Act Congress, which delivered its answer to the Crown. Seeing the hostile reaction in the colonies, the British government repealed the Stamp Act in March 1766 but at the same time passed the Declaratory Act, which said that Great Britain was superior (and boss of) the American colonies "in all cases whatsoever." The Stamp Act gave the colonists a target for their rage.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.) Why Were the British Concerned About French Activity in the Ohio River Valley?
    Cause Effect French and Indian War Need to tax for military funds Sugar Act Boycott/ Sons of Liberty Quartering Act­ 1765 Boycott/Sons of Liberty Stamp Act Repealed­ 1766 Stamp Act­1765 Declaratory Act­1766 Townshend Acts­ 1767 Boston Massacre­ 1770 Tea Act­ 1773 Boston Tea Party­ 1773 Boston Tea Party­ 1773 Intolerable Acts­ 1774 Nov 17­9:36 AM Review Questions: 1.) Why were the British concerned about French activity in the Ohio River valley? The British also claimed the Ohio River valley. 2.) What fatal errors did General Edward Braddock make? He tried to fight using tactics that worked in Europe and did not adapt to North American conditions. 3.) What was the outcome of the Battle of Quebec? The British defeated the French, who were no longer able to defend the rest of its North American territory. Nov 17­9:35 AM 1 *1763 ­ Colonists • loyal British subjects • identified with each other more than with Britain • French and Indian War left Britain in debt • British government had to keep troops in North America so France did not try to regain its lost territory and to protect settlers against Native American attacks. Nov 17­10:05 AM The Sugar Act 1764­ Sugar Act passed. It put a duty, or import tax, on several products, including molasses. Nov 17­10:05 AM 2 boycott ­ an organized campaign to refuse to buy certain products ­ of British goods; protests spread to every colony *Smugglers would receive harsh punishments; colonial merchants (who sometimes traded in smuggled goods) protested Nov 17­10:08 AM The Quartering Act • *1765 ­ Quartering Act passed to save money • Britain kept about 10,000 soldiers in colonies • Act required colonists to quarter, or allow soldiers to live in their homes, and provide them with food and other supplies Nov 17­10:05 AM 3 *Colonists protested and complained Parliament was violating their rights Committees of Correspondence • need to keep in closer contact with people in other colonies • Samuel Adams (cousin to John) established the Committee of Correspondence to keep colonists informed of British actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Real Estate II: Issues in Ownership of Real Property
    Global Practice Guide Real Estate II: Issues in Ownership of Real Property A Global Practice Guide prepared by the Lex Mundi Real Estate Group This guide is part of the Lex Mundi Global Practice Guide Series which features substantive overviews of laws, practice areas, and legal and business issues in jurisdictions around the globe. View the complete series at: www.lexmundi.com/GlobalPracticeGuides. Lex Mundi is the world’s leading network of independent law firms with in-depth experience in 100+ countries. Through close collaboration, our member firms are able to offer their clients preferred access to more than 21,000 lawyers worldwide – a global resource of unmatched breadth and depth. Lex Mundi – the law firms that know your markets. www.lexmundi.com About this Guide This multi-part Guide of Issues in Real Estate Investment and Finance presents jurisdictional overviews of real estate investment and financing laws in jurisdictions around the world, covering the following four general topics: Part I -- Foreign Investment Part II -- Ownership of Real Property Part III – Finance Part IV – Leasing Table of Contents Argentina ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Australia ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Austria ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TIERED ACTIVITIES Colonists Defy Parliament
    CHAPTER 6 • SECTION 1 which forbade the colonists from settling beyond the Appalachian Moun- tains. Although designed to maintain peace between the colonists and Native Americans, this law angered settlers who hoped to speculate, or buy as an investment, in western lands. In addition, King George decided More About . to keep 10,000 soldiers in the colonies to enforce the proclamation. But housing the troops proved very expensive. Therefore, Parliament passed the Stamp Act Protests Quartering Act, a law that required colonists to house all British soldiers. These new laws created great anxiety in the colonies. The colonists feared Some of the most violent protests to the that Parliament intended to use the troops to control their movements and Stamp Act occurred in New York. There, restrict their freedom. a mob burned an effigy (likeness) of the Parliament Taxes the Colonists In addition to the cost of keeping troops Answer: royal governor and raided some homes. Because in the colonies, Britain owed massive debts from the French and Indian War. Parliament was enforcing Other colonists took a more direct political new laws and restrictions To pay off these debts, Britain needed more revenue, or income. As a result, approach. For example, Benjamin Franklin that threatened the Parliament looked to the colonies to pay part of the costs for frontier defense appeared before Parliament, presenting colonists’ freedom to and colonial government. self-govern. arguments for the repeal of the act. In 1764, Parliament passed the Sugar Act. This law placed a tax on sugar, molasses, and other products shipped to the colonies.
    [Show full text]
  • Road to Revolution
    Road to Revolution 1760-1775 In 1607 The Virginia Company of London, an English trading company, planted the first permanent English settlement in North America at Jamestown. The successful establishment of this colony was no small achievement as the English had attempted to plant a colony in North America since the reign of Queen Elizabeth I in the l6th century. The Virginia Company operated under a royal charter, granted by King James I, which assured the original settlers they would have all liberties, franchises and immunities as if they had been “abiding and born within England.” By 1760, England and Scotland had united into the Kingdom of Great Britain and her settlements in North America had grown to thirteen thriving colonies with strong cultural, economic, and political ties to the mother country. Each colony enjoyed a certain amount of self- government. The ties which bound Great Britain and her American colonies were numerous. Wealthy men in the colonies, such as George Washington, used British trading companies as their agents to conduct business. Young men from prominent families, like Arthur Lee, went to Great Britain to finish their schooling. Colonial churches benefited from ministers who were educated in Great Britain. Many of the brightest men in the colonies, such as Benjamin Franklin of Pennsylvania, James Otis of Massachusetts, and Peyton Randolph of Virginia, served the British government as appointed officials. What then caused these strong ties to unravel after 1760? What caused the American colonists to revolt against their mother country in 1775? Though not recognized by most people at the time, economic and political forces beginning in 1760 on both sides of the Atlantic would force Great Britain and her American colonies to reassess their long relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Dutch Example on American Constitutional Beginnings
    laerswijck rX “A New Netherland September 1 Fig. 72. Title page of De Americaanse Almmack (1754) Courtesy of the New Jersey Historical Society, Newark, New Jersey. Rcprlnted from Stephen I,. Schechter and Richard B. Bernstein, New York a.& the Union: Conhibutions lo the American Comstifntional Eqetience (Albany, NY: New York State Commission on tbe Bicentennial 07 the U.S. Constitution, 1980): 22-28. From time to time, colonial governors and administrators in North America considered proposals for unification, primarily for defensive purposes. They looked to Europe for inspiration, finding in the Union of Utrecht a model that had served to regularize the confederation known as the United Provinces of the Netherlands. he Dutch impact on eighteenth-century America has liberty. An abbreviatedDutch text.of the Union had been often been told in terms of Knickerbockers and other reprinted in De Americaanse Almanak for 1754, the only Hudson Valley provincialisms, but the true heart of the surviving relic of a series of forty or fifty New York matter lies in the critical political and economic forces Dutch almanacs.2 The author of the articles began: by which The Netherlands affected the American scene. “These provinces, that is, the Dutch provinces, consist of Foremost were the traditions of union and liberty, sym- a group of commonwealths independent of one another, bolized by the Union of Utrecht, the de facto Dutch though united to protect one another against the common constitution. Emerging most clearly at the time of the enemy.” French and Indian War in the 175Os,the Dutch example, as it was often called, continued its positive impact The bloody and unsettling French and Indian War was through the period of the Continental Congresses,help- at hand.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stamp Act and the Political Origins of American Legal and Economic Institutions
    THE STAMP ACT AND THE POLITICAL ORIGINS OF AMERICAN LEGAL AND ECONOMIC INSTITUTIONS JUSTIN DuRIVAGE & CLAIRE PRIEST* The American colonialprotest againstParliament's Stamp Act was a landmark event in the history of the Founding Era, propelling the colonies toward independence. To date, scholars have focused on colonists' constitutional objections to the Stamp Act. Yet, the Stamp Act taxed legal and institutional services and, as this Article describes, the opposition to the Stamp Act also focused on defending low-cost institutions that served local communities. It examines the arguments for and against the Stamp Act as revealing two distinct visions of the role for institutions in economic growth. It suggests that American independence affirmed colonists' commitment to low-cost locally managed institutions within their developing economy. INTRODUCTION The British Parliament's enactment of the Stamp Act of 1765 is widely acknowledged as a starting point for the acceleration of tensions that led to the Declaration of Independence in 1776.1 In the dominant * Acting Assistant Professor, Stanford University, Department of History and Simeon E. Baldwin Professor, Yale Law School. We appreciate the comments of Owen Fiss, Daniel Klerman, Naomi Lamoreaux, James Livesey, Daniel Markovits, Nicholas Parrillo, Steven Pincus, and Carol Rose. We thank the participants in Yale's Center for Historical Enquiry and the Social Sciences; SELA (Seminario en Latinoamdrica de Teoria Constitucional y Politica), in Lima, Peru, and the participants at the Yale University, Mellon Foundation, Dundee University, and Scottish Centre for Global History conference on Finance, Communication and Coordination in Eighteenth-Century Empires. 1. See, e.g., BRENDAN MCCONVILLE, THE KING'S THREE FACES: THE RISE & FALL OF ROYAL AMERICA, 1688-1776, at 249 (2006); EDMUND S.
    [Show full text]