DOCSLIB.ORG

Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment Bulleen Precinct Plan Heritage Impact Assessment and Traditional Owner Engagement Sponsor: Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (ABN: 90 719 052 204) Heritage Advisor: Jonathan Howell-Meurs Author: Brigid Hill, Melinda Albrecht, and Dr Josara de Lange Date of Completion: DRAFT 9 May 2019 www.alassoc.com.au Andrew Long + Associates Pty Ltd ACN 131 713 409 ABN 86 131 409 Photo caption (Cover plate): Yarra River, Banyule Flats, Viewbank, facing northeast (Hill 2019) Copyright © 2019 by Andrew Long and Associates Pty Ltd Bulleen Precinct Plan Aboriginal Heritage Impact Assessment and Traditional Owner Engagement Sponsor: Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (ABN: 90 719 052 204) Heritage Advisors: Jonathan Howell-Meurs Authors: Brigid Hill, Melinda Albrecht, and Dr Josara de Lange Date of Completion: DRAFT 9 May 2019 Bulleen Precinct Plan – Aboriginal Heritage Impact Assessment ii Table of contents Table of contents ............................................................................................................................. iii Part 1 - Assessment .................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Introduction to the heritage impact assessment .................................................................................... 3 2.1 Purpose of the study ....................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Access to Victorian Aboriginal Heritage Register .............................................................................. 3 2.3 The location of the study area ......................................................................................................... 3 2.4 The name of the Sponsor ................................................................................................................ 3 2.5 The name of the Heritage Advisor ................................................................................................... 4 2.7 Registered Aboriginal Party ............................................................................................................. 4 2.8 The Yarra River - Birrarung .............................................................................................................. 4 3. Study description ................................................................................................................................. 8 4.1 Description of the study .................................................................................................................. 8 4. Extent of the Study area ....................................................................................................................... 9 5.1 Extent of the study area .................................................................................................................. 9 5. Documentation of consultation .......................................................................................................... 11 5.1 Registered Aboriginal Parties/Traditional Owners ......................................................................... 11 5.2 Participants in the assessment ...................................................................................................... 11 5.3 Summary of consultation .............................................................................................................. 11 6. Desktop Assessment .......................................................................................................................... 13 6.1 Introduction and aims ................................................................................................................... 13 6.2 Method of assessment .................................................................................................................. 13 6.3 Obstacles ...................................................................................................................................... 13 6.4 Persons involved in the desktop assessment ................................................................................. 13 6.5 RAP information ........................................................................................................................... 14 6.6 Geographic region ........................................................................................................................ 14 6.7 Geomorphology, landforms and environment of the study area .................................................... 14 6.7.1 Landforms and geomorphology .............................................................................................. 14 6.7.2 Environment .......................................................................................................................... 18 6.8 Victorian Aboriginal Heritage Register search ................................................................................ 24 6.9 Review of historical and ethnohistorical accounts of Aboriginal occupation in the geographic region ...................................................................................................................................................... 26 6.9.1 Ethnohistorical accounts ........................................................................................................ 26 6.9.2 Post-contact history ............................................................................................................... 41 6.10 Review of reports and published work about Aboriginal cultural heritage in the region ................ 43 6.10.1 Regional studies - Introduction ............................................................................................. 43 6.10.2 Regional studies ................................................................................................................... 43 6.10.3 Localised studies - Introduction ............................................................................................ 45 6.10.4 Localised studies .................................................................................................................. 45 6.10.5 Implications of previous archaeological investigations relating to the current study area ....... 48 6.11 A review of the history of the use of the study area ..................................................................... 48 6.12 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................ 51 7. Standard Assessment ......................................................................................................................... 53 7.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 53 7.2 Previously registered Aboriginal cultural heritage places ............................................................... 53 7.3 Method of assessment .................................................................................................................. 53 7.3.1 Aims ...................................................................................................................................... 53 7.3.2 Survey methodology .............................................................................................................. 53 7.4 Obstacles ...................................................................................................................................... 54 7.5 Participants in the standard assessment ........................................................................................ 54 7.6 RAP information ........................................................................................................................... 54 Bulleen Precinct Plan – Aboriginal Heritage Impact Assessment iii 7.7 Results of the standard assessment ............................................................................................... 54 8. References ......................................................................................................................................... 62 Figures Figure 1: Showing drainage channel with ground surface exposed banks ..................................................... 56 Figure 2: Showing poor ground surface visibility due to vegetation cover, facing south (Hill 2019) ............ 56 Figure 3: West of Bulleen Drive-in, facing west over the Yarra River (Hill 2019) ........................................... 56 Figure 4: Showing remnant mature native trees, on bank of Yarra River, facing northwest ........................ 56 Figure 5: Previous disturbance, footings of past creek crossing, facing west ................................................ 56 Figure 6: Modified land at Bullen Drive-in, facing east .................................................................................. 56 Figure 7: Informal pedestrian walkway circumnavigates the billabong ......................................................... 57 Figure 8: Grass cover at Bolin Bolin ......................................................................................................... 57 Figure 9: Ground surface visibility at Banksia Park .................................................................................. 58 Figure 10: Example of introduced gravel pathway, Heidi ........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ON TAUNGURUNG LAND SHARING HISTORY and CULTURE Aboriginal History Incorporated Aboriginal History Inc
    ON TAUNGURUNG LAND SHARING HISTORY AND CULTURE Aboriginal History Incorporated Aboriginal History Inc. is a part of the Australian Centre for Indigenous History, Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University, and gratefully acknowledges the support of the School of History and the National Centre for Indigenous Studies, The Australian National University. Aboriginal History Inc. is administered by an Editorial Board which is responsible for all unsigned material. Views and opinions expressed by the author are not necessarily shared by Board members. Contacting Aboriginal History All correspondence should be addressed to the Editors, Aboriginal History Inc., ACIH, School of History, RSSS, 9 Fellows Road (Coombs Building), The Australian National University, Acton, ACT, 2601, or [email protected]. WARNING: Readers are notified that this publication may contain names or images of deceased persons. ON TAUNGURUNG LAND SHARING HISTORY AND CULTURE UNCLE ROY PATTERSON AND JENNIFER JONES Published by ANU Press and Aboriginal History Inc. The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] Available to download for free at press.anu.edu.au ISBN (print): 9781760464066 ISBN (online): 9781760464073 WorldCat (print): 1224453432 WorldCat (online): 1224452874 DOI: 10.22459/OTL.2020 This title is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The full licence terms are available at creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Cover design and layout by ANU Press Cover photograph: Patterson family photograph, circa 1904 This edition © 2020 ANU Press and Aboriginal History Inc. Contents Acknowledgements ....................................... vii Note on terminology ......................................ix Preface .................................................xi Introduction: Meeting and working with Uncle Roy ..............1 Part 1: Sharing Taungurung history 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Why We Called Them What We Called Them
    The Googong North edition. Googonian streets, parks and playgrounds. Why we called them what we called them. The Googong North edition. Googonian streets, parks and playgrounds. A lot of thought and research has gone into the naming of Googong North’s streets, parks and playgrounds. So we thought we’d share the stories behind these names that may have already become such a familiar part of your life at Googong. The stories are all rooted in the region’s history. Googong’s parks, playgrounds and open spaces celebrate the rich history of the natural indigenous custodians of the land. The streets pay homage to the early settlers of the region, as well as places and personalities from more recent history. We hope you enjoy discovering a little more about the pre-Googonian era! 1 Googong North streets, parks and playgrounds CONTENTS STREETS GOOGONG’S NGUNAWAL A H N PAST Aitken Street 3 Hale Street 10 Nano Street 17 Alchin Street 3 Hanns Street 10 Nellie Street 17 Bunburung Thina 24 Amy Alley 3 Hawes Street 10 Newton Street 17 Annlouise Lane 3 Hawke Street 10 Norma Street 17 Nangi Pimble 24 Aprasia Avenue 3 Hearne Street 10 Ayliffe Street 3 Heath Lane 10 O Yerradhang Nguru 25 Heazlett Street 10 O’Hara Lane 17 B Helen Circuit 11 Munnagai Woggabaliri 25 Bailey Crescent 4 Henshaw Street 11 Baker Crescent 4 Hopkins Street 11 P The original residents Bambridge Parade 4 Hopper Walk 11 Percival Road 18 and their rich history 25 Banks Street 4 Pickering Street 18 Baxter Loop 4 I Plummer Street 18 Pollack Street 18 Beltana Avenue 4 Ida Lane 11 Beltana
    [Show full text]
  • Corroboree Moderne
    Corrected draft May 2004 CORROBOREE MODERNE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dressed in a brown wool bodystocking specially made by Jantzen and brown face paint, an American dancer, Beth Dean played the young boy initiate in the ballet CORROBOREE at a Gala performance before Queen Elizabeth 11 and Prince Phillip on Feb 4 1954 . “On stage she seems to exude some of the primitive passion of the savage whose rites she presents” (1a) “If appropriations do have a general character, it is surely that of unstable duality. In some proportion, they always combine taking and acknowledgment, appropriation and homage, a critique of colonial exclusions, and collusion in imbalanced exchange. What the problem demands is therefore not an endorsement or rejection of primitivism in principle, but an exploration of how particular works were motivated and assessed.” (1) CORROBOREE "announced its modernity as loudly as its Australian origins…all around the world" (2) 1: (BE ABORIGINAL !) (3) - DANCE A CORROBOREE! The 1950s in the Northern Territory represents simultaneously the high point of corroboree and its vanishing point. At the very moment one of the most significant cultural exchanges of the decade was registered in Australian Society at large, the term corroboree became increasingly so associated with kitsch and the inauthentic it was erased as a useful descriptor, only to be reclaimed almost fifty years later. Corroboree became the bastard notion par excellence imbued with “in- authenticity.” It was such a popularly known term, that it stood as a generic brand for anything dinky-di Australian. (4) Corroboree came to be read as code for tourist trash culture corrupted by white man influence.
    [Show full text]
  • Banyule City Council Aboriginal Heritage Study (1999)
    BANYULE CITY COUNCIL Aboriginal Heritage Study PUBLIC EDITION prepared by: Brendan Marshall AUSTRAL HERITAGE CONSULTANTS 28 Anketell St Coburg 3058 February 1999 Note: This publication does not include specific information with regard to the location of Aboriginal heritage sites. That information has been provided to Banyule City Council on a confidential basis especially for use for site management purposes and in relation to the consideration of proposals for land use and development. EXPLANATORY NOTE The Aboriginal Heritage Study was considered by Banyule City Council at its meeting on 8 February 1999. At that meeting Council resolved not to adopt the recommendations of the Study which related to amendments to the Banyule Planning Scheme, but to liaise with the Department of Infrastructure and Aboriginal Affairs Victoria to determine the most appropriate way to include protection for Aboriginal sites in the Banyule Planning Scheme. Council also resolved to adopt Recommendations 1-15 of the Aboriginal Heritage Study. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements Abstract INTRODUCTION 9 1.1 Preamble 9 1.2 Significance of Aboriginal Heritage 10 1.3 Scope 12 1.4 Planning Considerations 12 1.5 Project Aims 13 1.6 Report Organisation 14 1.7 The Wurundjeri 14 1.8 Aboriginal Archaeological Site Types 14 1.8.1 Stone Artefact Scatters 14 1.8.2 Isolated Artefacts 14 1.8.3 Scarred Trees 15 1.9 Other Possible Aboriginal Archaeological Site Types 15 1.9.1 Freshwater Shell Middens 15 1.9.2 Aboriginal Burials 15 1.9.3 Post-European Sites 15 1.10 Terms and Definitions
    [Show full text]
  • Merri Creek Sediment Project: a Model for Inter-Government Solution Development
    Merri Creek Sediment Project: A model for Inter-Government Solution Development Melanie Holmes & Toby Prosser Melbourne Water Corporation, 990 La Trobe Street, Docklands VIC 3008 [email protected] [email protected] Background The Merri Creek, a tributary of Melbourne’s Yarra River, Figure 1: Merri Creek Catchment originates near Wallan, flowing 70km through Melbourne’s northern suburbs to its confluence near Dights Falls in Abbotsford. With a catchment of approximately 390 km2, it falls within the municipal areas of Darebin, Hume, Mitchell, Moreland, Whittlesea and City of Yarra. It is a high profile waterway, supporting good remnant ecological values in its upper, and, significant recreational values in its lower reaches. Merri Creek Management Committee (MCMC) and Friends of Merri Creek both play an active role in environmental protection and advocacy. As with other urban and peri urban waterways, Merri Creek is impacted by stormwater runoff from its catchment areas, varying in effect due to catchment activities and the level of impermeability. Merri Creek has been identified as Melbourne’s most polluted waterway (The Age, 2011), and has recently been subject to heavy rainfall driven sediment loads. This issue has also been the focus of community and media scrutiny, with articles in the Melbourne metropolitan daily newspaper (The Age) and local newspapers featuring MCMC discussing the damaging effects of stormwater inputs. Sediment is generated through the disturbance of soils within the catchment through vegetation removal, excavation, soil importation and dumping, as well as in stream erosion caused by altered flow regimes, such as increases in flow quantity, velocity and frequency as a result of urbanisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Platypus Rescued Then Surveyed in Merri Creek
    The Friends of Merri Creek Newsletter May – July 2012 Friends of Merri Creek is the proud winner of the 2011 Victorian Landcare Award Platypus rescued then surveyed in Merri Creek After a platypus was rescued from plastic litter in Merri Creek near Moreland Rd Coburg on 25 January, Melbourne Water commissioned a survey for platypus in the creek. A number of reliable platypus sightings in Merri Creek from Healesville Sanctuary, he was released back into over the past 18 months raised hopes that this iconic his territory in Merri Creek. Following this, Melbourne species may have recolonised one of Melbourne’s Water commissioned cesar to conduct surveys to try to most urbanised waterways after a very long absence. determine the extent of the distribution and relative Platypuses were apparently abundant in Merri Creek abundance of platypuses in Merri Creek. in the late 1800’s, but slowly disappeared as the creek In conjunction with the surveys, an information session and surrounding areas were degraded by the growing was held at CERES where more than 50 people turned urbanisation of Melbourne’s suburbs. Widespread surveys out to watch cesar ecologists demonstrate how fyke nets in Merri Creek in early 1995 by the Australian Platypus are set to catch platypuses, followed by a talk on platypus Conservancy failed to capture any platypuses, and it is biology and conservation issues. Live trapping surveys generally accepted that platypuses have been locally were conducted over two nights in February, sampling extinct in the creek for decades. Occasional sightings from Arthurton Rd to Bell St. The surveys involved near the confluence with the Yarra River have indicated setting pairs of fyke nets at a number of sites during the the potential for recolonisation by individuals entering afternoon, checking the nets throughout the night to from the Yarra River.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Hunger: Port Phillip, 1835
    Land Hunger: Port Phillip, 1835 By Glen Foster An historical game using role-play and cards for 4 players from upper Primary school to adults. © Glen Foster, 2019 1 Published by Port Fairy Historical Society 30 Gipps Street, Port Fairy. 3284. Telephone: (03) 5568 2263 Email: [email protected] Postal address: Port Fairy Historical Society P.O. Box 152, Port Fairy, Victoria, 3284 Australia Copyright © Glen Foster, 2019 Reproduction and communication for educational and private purposes Educational institutions downloading this work are able to photocopy the material for their own educational purposes. The general public downloading this work are able to photocopy the material for their own private use. Requests and enquiries for further authorisation should be addressed to Glen Foster: email: [email protected]. Disclaimers These materials are intended for education and training and private use only. The author and Port Fairy Historical Society accept no responsibility or liability for any incomplete or inaccurate information presented within these materials within the poetic license used by the author. Neither the author nor Port Fairy Historical Society accept liability or responsibility for any loss or damage whatsoever suffered as a result of direct or indirect use or application of this material. Print on front page shows members of the Kulin Nations negotiating a “treaty” with John Batman in 1835. Reproduced courtesy of National Library of Australia. George Rossi Ashton, artist. © Glen Foster, 2019 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage Strategy 2008
    Cultural Heritage Strategy 2008 – 2011 Preserving and promoting our cultural heritage Before unveiling the plaque From MMBW to at the offi cial opening of the Upper Yarra Dam, the Governor Melbourne Water acknowledged the motto of the Metropolitan Board ‘Public health is my reward’ and added… “I think you will agree that our Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works has never let us down in the past. It certainly has not let us A motto is a phrase describing the motivation or intention of an organisation. The crest of the down today and I know it will MMBW bears the motto, ‘salas mea publica merces’ not let us down in the future.” (‘public health is my reward’). 1891 Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works (MMBW) was established with a charter to build and maintain an underground sewerage system and operate Melbourne’s water supply. 1991 MMBW merged with the Mornington Peninsula District Water Board, Dandenong Valley and Western Port Authorities, Dandenong- Springvale Water Board, Pakenham Water Board, Lang Lang Water Board and Emerald Water Board to form Melbourne Water. At this time, Melbourne Water has three operational regions – Maribyrnong, Yarra and South East. 1995 The Victorian Government split Melbourne’s water industry into three retail water businesses (City West Water, Yarra Valley Water and South East Water). Melbourne Water was established as the wholesale water business and Melbourne Parks and Waterways (the predecessor to Parks Victoria) was set up to manage parks. Melbourne Water retains responsibility for the collection, storage and wholesaling of water and for the treatment and disposal of sewage, as well as responsibility for regional drainage and waterways within the Melbourne Water operational boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the 2018 Program
    sydneylivingmuseums.com.au/enewsSign up to our free monthly eNews STAY IN TOUCH PROGRAM A E M Welcome to country by Art workshops House tours Leanne Watson and 11am–3pm 11.30am, 12.30pm, Rhiannon Wright, and Join Darug artist Leanne 1.30pm & 2.30pm flag-raising ceremony Watson to create a Register for a 30-minute 10.10am–10.30am message stone. tour of Rouse Hill Smoking ceremony by House from a woman’s Nulungu Dreaming F perspective. 10.30am–10.40am Gumaroy Newman 12pm–1pm N B Hear acclaimed singer and Culture talks Nulungu Dreaming poet Gumaroy Newman. 12.15pm, 1.15pm & 2.15pm corroboree Join a Muru Mittigar 10.40am–11.30am G Cultural Educator at the Celebrate Aboriginal culture Darug language classes Darug display in the through dance and song. in the schoolhouse Rouse Hill Visitor Centre. 11.30am & 1.30pm C O Learn to say hello in Darug NAIDOC BECAUSE OF HER, WE CAN! Boomerang throwing in our 1888 schoolhouse. Weaving workshop with Muru Mittigar 12pm–3pm 10.45am–12.30pm H Learn traditional Sunday 15 July & 1pm–3pm Boomerang painting weaving techniques from Throw a boomerang All day Nulungu Dreaming. and learn more about Drop in and paint your this ancient tool. own boomerang. FOOD & DRINK We acknowledge the First D K Nations Peoples, the Darug I & J & P Get Wild native animal Market stalls display and talks All day Enjoy a BBQ cook-up from peoples, the traditional 11am–2pm Mad Mob, tea and coffee Stalls by Aunty Edna, Watson. Leanne by custodians of the land, and from Darcy St Project and Muru Mittigar nursery, traditional Aboriginal foods pay respect to the Elders, AIME, Gillawarra Arts, at Muru Mittigar cafe.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction & Recommendations
    Separate Attachment COM 20A Ordinary Meeting of Council 26 April 2016 MOUNT ALEXANDER SHIRE THEMATIC HERITAGE STUDY ARCHITECTS CONSERVATION Introduction & CONSULTANTS Recommendations TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Brief 2 1.3 Study Area 2 1.4 Earlier Reports 3 1.5 Study Team 3 1.5 Acknowledgements 3 2 Methodology 2.1 General 4 2.2 Survey Work 4 2.3 Research 4 2.4 Consultation 5 3 The Themes 3.1 The Framework 6 3.2 Overview of the Themes 6 4 Recommendations 4.1 Introduction 8 4.2 Existing Schedule to the Heritage Overlay 8 4.3 Further Review Work 9 Mount Alexander Shire Thematic Heritage Study Introduction & Recommendations Volume 1 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background This Thematic Heritage Study has been prepared for the Shire of Mount Alexander by RBA Architects and Conservation Consultants. It consists of two sections: Volume 1 – Introduction & Recommendations. This volume outlines the process by which the thematic history was prepared as well as recommending some areas for further investigation and places of potential significance. Volume 2 – A Thematic History of the Shire according to nine themes and concluding with a Statement of Significance. The need for the preparation of an all-encompassing, Shire-wide thematic history had been identified as a key priority in the local Heritage Strategy 2012-2016.1 A thematic history has previously been prepared for sections of Mount Alexander Shire, within the heritage studies of the former shires of Metcalfe and Newstead. In addition, although many places are protected by heritage overlays further assessment was needed according to the Heritage Strategy as follows: Protecting & Managing There are over 1000 places in the Schedule to the Heritage Overlay however these are unevenly spread across the Shire.
    [Show full text]
  • William Barak
    WILLIAM BARAK A brief essay about William Barak drawn from the booklet William Barak - Bridge Builder of the Kulin by Gibb Wettenhall, and published by Aboriginal Affairs Victoria. Barak was educated at the Yarra Mission School in Narrm (Melbourne), and was a tracker in the Native Police before, as his father had done, becoming ngurungaeta (clan leader). Known as energetic, charismatic and mild mannered, he spent much of his life at Coranderrk Reserve, a self-sufficient Aboriginal farming community in Healesville. Barak campaigned to protect Coranderrk, worked to improve cross-cultural understanding and created many unique artworks and artefacts, leaving a rich cultural legacy for future generations. Leader William Barak was born into the Wurundjeri clan of the Woi wurung people in 1823, in the area now known as Croydon, in Melbourne. Originally named Beruk Barak, he adopted the name William after joining the Native Police as a 19 year old. Leadership was in Barak's blood: his father Bebejan was a ngurunggaeta (clan head) and his Uncle Billibellary, a signatory to John Batman's 1835 "treaty", became the Narrm (Melbourne) region's most senior elder. As a boy, Barak witnessed the signing of this document, which was to have grave and profound consequences for his people. Soon after white settlement a farming boom forced the Kulin peoples from their land, and many died of starvation and disease. During those hard years, Barak emerged as a politically savvy leader, skilled mediator and spokesman for his people. In partnership with his cousin Simon Wonga, a ngurunggaeta, Barak worked to establish and protect Coranderrk, a self- sufficient Aboriginal farming community in Healesville, and became a prominent figure in the struggle for Aboriginal rights and justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Billibellary's
    Billibellary’s Walk A cultural interpretation of the landscape that provides an experience of connection to country which Wurundjeri people continue to have, both physically and spiritually. Lying within the University of Melbourne’s built environment are the whispers and songs of the Wurundjeri people. As one of the clans of the Kulin Nation, the Wurundjeri people of the Woiwurrung language group walked the grounds upon which the University now stands for more than 40,000 years Stop 4 – Aboriginal Knowledge Stop 10 – Billibellary’s Country Aboriginal knowledge, bestowed through an oral tradition, is What would Billibellary think if he were to walk with you ever-evolving, enabling it to reflect its context. Sir Walter Baldwin now? The landscape has changed but while it looks Spencer, the University’s foundation professor of Biology in 1887, different on the surface Billibellary might remind you it still was highly esteemed for his anthropological and ethnographic holds the story of the Wurundjeri connection to Country work in Aboriginal communities but the Aboriginal community and our continuing traditions. today regards this work as a misappropriation of Aboriginal culture and knowledge. Artist: Kelly Koumalatsos, Wergaia/Wemba Wemba, Stop 5 – Self-determination and Community Control Possum Skin Cloak, Koorie Heritage Trust collection. Murrup Barak, Melbourne Indigenous Development Institute represents the fight that Billibellary, the Wurundjeri people, and Take a walk through Billibellary’s Country. indeed the whole Kulin nation were to face. The institute’s name Feel, know, imagine Melbourne’s six uses Woiwurung language to speak of the spirit of William Barak, seasons as they are subtly reconstructed Billibellary’s nephew and successor as Ngurungaeta to the as the context for understanding place and Wurundjeri Willam.
    [Show full text]