DOCSLIB.ORG

The Earth's Lithosphere-Documentary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Earth's Lithosphere-Documentary See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310021377 The Earth's Lithosphere-Documentary Presentation · November 2011 CITATIONS READS 0 1,973 1 author: A. Balasubramanian University of Mysore 348 PUBLICATIONS 315 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Indian Social Sceince Congress-Trends in Earth Science Research View project Numerical Modelling for Prediction and Control of Saltwater Encroachment in the Coastal Aquifers of Tuticorin, Tamil Nadu View project All content following this page was uploaded by A. Balasubramanian on 13 November 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. THE EARTH’S LITHOSPHERE- Documentary By Prof. A. Balasubramanian University of Mysore 19-11-2011 Introduction Earth’s environmental segments include Atmosphere, Hydrosphere, lithosphere, and biosphere. Lithosphere is the basic solid sphere of the planet earth. It is the sphere of hard rock masses. The land we live in is on this lithosphere only. All other spheres are attached to this lithosphere due to earth’s gravity. Lithosphere is a massive and hard solid substratum holding the semisolid, liquid, biotic and gaseous molecules and masses surrounding it. All geomorphic processes happen on this sphere. It is the sphere where all natural resources are existing. It links the cyclic processes of atmosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere. Lithosphere also acts as the basic route for all biogeochemical activities. For all geographic studies, a basic understanding of the lithosphere is needed. In this lesson, the following aspects are included: 1. The Earth’s Interior. 2. The Lithospheric Plates . 3. The Plate tectonics. 4. The Earth’s Internal processes. 5. The Magma and its emplacements. 1. THE EARTH’S INTERIOR The Earth’s lithosphere is composed of three major solid layers as outermost Crust, middle Mantle and the central Core. The Crust is the outermost layer of the earth on which all living organisms survive. This is a very thin layer. It is ranging from 5 km under the oceans to 100 km under the mountainous areas of continents. Usually, it’s about 40 km thick under the flat continents. The crust is made of many types of rocks and thousands of minerals. These rocks and minerals are made from just 8 elements. They are Oxygen (46.6%), Silicon (27.72%), Aluminum (8.13%), Iron (5.00%), Calcium(3.63%), Sodium (2.83%), Potassium (2.70%) and Magnesium (2.09%). The rocks present in the earth’s crust are solid, rigid and brittle in nature. They are also highly variable, including rocks of molten origin, rocks of sedimentary origin, and rocks that have undergone all sorts of structural and chemical alterations through metamorphism. The crust itself can be divided into two sub-layers. One kind of layer is found everywhere, under the oceans and also below the continents. This is called as the oceanic crust. This layer is dominated by relatively heavy, dark, dense rocks of “mafic” composition. Most of these mafic rocks are of volcanic in origin and are called “basalts.” This dense, heavy mafic layer is sometimes called the “SiMa” denoting its chemistry as silica and magnesium. It tends to be relatively thin, usually from about 5-12 km in thickness. A second layer is normally found in the continents. It is made up of light colored rocks. These rocks are primarily composed of silicates enriched in lighter elements, such as aluminum (Al), potassium (K), and sodium (Na). This layer is called as “SiAl” as it is dominated by silicate rocks with lighter elements mixed with aluminum. These rocks are granitic masses and hence, this layer is called as the granitic layer. This is considerably thicker, around 40 km, than the basaltic lower layer, 1 Below this crust, the earth’s solid constituents have shown a transition. The density of the mass is very high and very rigid. Seismic soundings have identified a discontinuity between the crust and this layer. This is the mantle layer of the earth. There is a sharp increase in the velocity of seismic waves as they pass into this layer of differing density and rigidity. The Mohorovicic discontinuity (often called, simply, “the Moho”) marks the transition from the bottom of the crust to the top of this mantle layer. Andrija Mohorovicic first noticed this effect in the year 1909. He found that some of the earthquake waves near the surface, moved slower than the earthquake waves that passed through the interior of the Earth. He also noticed that the P (primary, first and strongest) waves that passed through the interior of the Earth, did move in a straight line. These waves were bent or deflected by something. He decided that the outside layer of Crust was made of less dense material (Rock) and the mantle. The Mantle was much denser. Waves of all other kinds move faster and straighter through this denser, more solid layer. Based on this observation, the nature of the mantle was identified. The Earth’s Mantle The middle, mantle, layer makes up the largest volume of the Earth’s interior. It is almost 2900 kilometers thick and comprises of about 83% of the Earth’s volume. It is divided into two layers as upper mantle and lower mantle. The upper mantle is about 670 kilometers in depth. It is brittle and less dense. It is made up of peridotites. These are rocks made up of olivine and pyroxene minerals. These are largely silicate minerals and the rocks are basic in character. These rocks are highly enriched with iron and magnesium, and hence they are called as “ultramafic” rocks. These ultramafic rocks are dark in color due to the presence of iron and magnesium. These rocks are extremely heavy and dense compared with the typical surface rocks. The rocks in the upper mantle are more rigid and brittle because of cooler temperatures and lower pressures. The Lower Mantle is much thicker and denser. It is 670 to 2900 kilomteres below the Earth’s surface. This layer is hot and plastic. The higher pressure existing in this layer causes the formation of minerals that are different from those of the upper mantle. The mantle varies in its state of matter. It is soft and in nearly liquid condition near its inner boundary with the liquid outer core and again near the top, a few kilometers under the earth’s crust. In other areas, it may show nearly brittle condition and solidity. The Earth’s Core: The Earth’s central Core contains two different layers as Outer Core and Inner Core. The Outer Core is a hot liquid layer and the Inner Core is a hot and solid layer. Beno Gutenberg discovered the boundary as a discontinuity between the mantle and the outer core. This boundary was named after him, as Gutenberg discontinuity. The outer core is at 2890-5150 km below the earth’s surface. 2 The temperature in the outer core is about 4000-50000C. The molten, liquid iron in the outer core is important because it helps to create the Earth’s magnetic field. The outer core is about 2250 km thick. The outer core is known to exist in a liquid state because of the behavior of earthquake waves, particularly shear body waves or secondary waves. Liquid cannot respond to shear forces, so it can’t transmit shear waves. As a result, there is a seismic shadow on the side of the earth antipodal to an earthquake’s epicenter. Solid Inner Core The inner core is 5150-6370 km below the earth’s surface. It mainly consists of iron, nickel and some lighter elements , probably sulphur, carbon, oxygen, silicon and potassium. The temperature in the inner core is about 5000-60000C. Because of the high pressure, the inner core is solid. The solidity of the inner core is due to the presence of iron and nickel. The core is incredibly hot in the centre and the pressure is so great that the melting point of iron and nickel is elevated far beyond those high temperatures (6,500 K), leaving the nickel-iron as solid. 2. THE LITHOSPHERIC PLATES The lithosphere is broken up into tectonic plates. There are currently seven or eight major and many minor plates. The lithospheric plates ride on the asthenosphere. These plates move in relation to one another at one of three types of plate boundaries as convergent( or collisional )boundaries, divergent boundaries(also called as spreading centers); and conservative transform boundaries. Plate size can vary greatly, from a few hundred to thousands of kilometers across; the Pacific and Antarctic Plates are among the largest. Plate thickness also varies greatly, ranging from less than 15 km for young oceanic lithosphere to about 200 km or more for ancient continental lithosphere. Tectonic plates probably got developed in the earlier period of the Earth's 4.6-billion-year old history. They have been drifting on the surface ever since-like slow-moving bumper cars repeatedly clustering together and then separating each other. The movement of plates has caused the formation and break-up of continents over time, including occasional formation of a supercontinent that contains most or all of the continents. The supercontinent Columbia or Nuna was formed during a period of 2.0–1.8 billion years. It got broken up about 1.5–1.3 billion years ago. The supercontinent Rodinia is thought to have formed about 1 billion years ago and to have embodied most or all of Earth's continents. It also got broken up into eight continents around 600 million years ago. The eight continents later re-assembled into another as a supercontinent called as Pangaea.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Canada's Active Western Margin
    Geoscience Canada. Volume 3. Nunber 4 269 in the area of Washington and Oregon seemed necessary geometrically. This suggestion was reiterated by Tobin and Sykes (1968) in their study of the seismicity ofthe regionanddevelopedin established the presence and basic bathymetric trench at the foot of the Canada's Active configuration of an active spreading continental slope, the absence of a ocean ridge system ofl the west coast of clearly defined eastward dipping Beniofl Western Margin - Vancwver Island. The theory of the earthquake zone and the apparently geometrical mwement of rigid quiescent state of present volcanism The Case for lithospheric plates on a spherical earth have all contributed toward a (introducedas the 'paving stone' theory) widespreaa uncertalnfy as to whether Subduction was tirst ~ro~osedand tasted bv subddctlon 1s cbrrently taking place ~c~enziiand Parker (1967) using data (e.8.. Crosson. 1972: ~rivast&a,1973; R. P. Riddihough and R. D. Hyndnan from the N. Pacific and in the global Stacey. 1973). Past subduction, fran Victoria Geophysical Observatory, extension of the theory by Morgan several tens of m.y. ago until at leastone Earth Physics Branch, (1 968) this reglon again played a major or two m y. ago. IS more generally Department Energy, Mines and role Morgan alsoconcluded that a small accepted ana it seems to us that the Resources, block eitof theJuandeFuca ridge (the case for contemporary subduction, in a 5071 W. Saanich Rd. Juan de Fuca plate. Fig. 2) was moving large part, must beargued upona Victoria B. C. independently of the main Pacific plate. continuation into the present of the The possibility that theJuan de Fuca processes shown to be active in the Summary plate is now underthrustingNorth recent geological past.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report
    l 122 EARTHQUAKES AND SEISMOLOGY - LEGAL ASPECTS OPEN FILE REPORT 92-2 EARTHQUAKES AND Ludwin, R. S.; Malone, S. D.; Crosson, R. EARTHQUAKES AND SEISMOLOGY - LEGAL S.; Qamar, A. I., 1991, Washington SEISMOLOGY - 1946 EVENT ASPECTS eanhquak:es, 1985. Clague, J. J., 1989, Research on eanh- Ludwin, R. S.; Qamar, A. I., 1991, Reeval­ Perkins, J. B.; Moy, Kenneth, 1989, Llabil­ quak:e-induced ground failures in south­ uation of the 19th century Washington ity of local government for earthquake western British Columbia [abstract). and Oregon eanhquake catalog using hazards and losses-A guide to the law Evans, S. G., 1989, The 1946 Mount Colo­ original accounts-The moderate sized and its impacts in the States of Califor­ nel Foster rock avalanches and auoci­ earthquake of May l, 1882 [abstract). nia, Alaska, Utah, and Washington; ated displacement wave, Vancouver Is­ Final repon. Maley, Richard, 1986, Strong motion accel­ land, British Columbia. erograph stations in Oregon and Wash­ Hasegawa, H. S.; Rogers, G. C., 1978, EARTHQUAKES AND ington (April 1986). Appendix C Quantification of the magnitude 7.3, SEISMOLOGY - NETWORKS Malone, S. D., 1991, The HAWK seismic British Columbia earthquake of June 23, AND CATALOGS data acquisition and analysis system 1946. [abstract). Berg, J. W., Jr.; Baker, C. D., 1963, Oregon Hodgson, E. A., 1946, British Columbia eanhquak:es, 1841 through 1958 [ab­ Milne, W. G., 1953, Seismological investi­ earthquake, June 23, 1946. gations in British Columbia (abstract). stract). Hodgson, J. H.; Milne, W. G., 1951, Direc­ Chan, W.W., 1988, Network and array anal­ Munro, P. S.; Halliday, R. J.; Shannon, W.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-44568-9 — Active Faults of the World Robert Yeats Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-44568-9 — Active Faults of the World Robert Yeats Index More Information Index Abancay Deflection, 201, 204–206, 223 Allmendinger, R. W., 206 Abant, Turkey, earthquake of 1957 Ms 7.0, 286 allochthonous terranes, 26 Abdrakhmatov, K. Y., 381, 383 Alpine fault, New Zealand, 482, 486, 489–490, 493 Abercrombie, R. E., 461, 464 Alps, 245, 249 Abers, G. A., 475–477 Alquist-Priolo Act, California, 75 Abidin, H. Z., 464 Altay Range, 384–387 Abiz, Iran, fault, 318 Alteriis, G., 251 Acambay graben, Mexico, 182 Altiplano Plateau, 190, 191, 200, 204, 205, 222 Acambay, Mexico, earthquake of 1912 Ms 6.7, 181 Altunel, E., 305, 322 Accra, Ghana, earthquake of 1939 M 6.4, 235 Altyn Tagh fault, 336, 355, 358, 360, 362, 364–366, accreted terrane, 3 378 Acocella, V., 234 Alvarado, P., 210, 214 active fault front, 408 Álvarez-Marrón, J. M., 219 Adamek, S., 170 Amaziahu, Dead Sea, fault, 297 Adams, J., 52, 66, 71–73, 87, 494 Ambraseys, N. N., 226, 229–231, 234, 259, 264, 275, Adria, 249, 250 277, 286, 288–290, 292, 296, 300, 301, 311, 321, Afar Triangle and triple junction, 226, 227, 231–233, 328, 334, 339, 341, 352, 353 237 Ammon, C. J., 464 Afghan (Helmand) block, 318 Amuri, New Zealand, earthquake of 1888 Mw 7–7.3, 486 Agadir, Morocco, earthquake of 1960 Ms 5.9, 243 Amurian Plate, 389, 399 Age of Enlightenment, 239 Anatolia Plate, 263, 268, 292, 293 Agua Blanca fault, Baja California, 107 Ancash, Peru, earthquake of 1946 M 6.3 to 6.9, 201 Aguilera, J., vii, 79, 138, 189 Ancón fault, Venezuela, 166 Airy, G.
    [Show full text]
  • Longitudinal and Temporal Evolution of the Tectonic Style Along The
    Longitudinal and Temporal Evolution of the Tectonic Style Along the Cyprus Arc System, Assessed Through 2-D Reflection Seismic Interpretation Vasilis Symeou, Catherine Homberg, Fadi H. Nader, Romain Darnault, Jean-claude Lecomte, Nikolaos Papadimitriou To cite this version: Vasilis Symeou, Catherine Homberg, Fadi H. Nader, Romain Darnault, Jean-claude Lecomte, et al.. Longitudinal and Temporal Evolution of the Tectonic Style Along the Cyprus Arc System, Assessed Through 2-D Reflection Seismic Interpretation. Tectonics, American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2018, 37 (1), pp.30 - 47. 10.1002/2017TC004667. hal-01827497 HAL Id: hal-01827497 https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01827497 Submitted on 2 Jul 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Longitudinal and Temporal Evolution of the Tectonic Style Along the Cyprus Arc System, Assessed Through 2-D Reflection Seismic Interpretation Vasilis Symeou1,2 , Catherine Homberg1, Fadi H. Nader2, Romain Darnault2, Jean-Claude Lecomte2, and Nikolaos Papadimitriou1,2 1ISTEP, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France, 2Geosciences Division, IFP Energies nouvelles, Rueil-Malmaison, Key Points: • Lateral changes from a compressional France to a strike-slip regime along the Cyprus Arc • Different crustal nature in the eastern Abstract The Cyprus Arc system constitutes a major active plate boundary in the eastern Mediterranean Mediterranean region.
    [Show full text]
  • Glacial Rebound and Plate Spreading: Results from the First Countrywide GPS Observations in Iceland
    Geophys. J. Int. (2009) 177, 691–716 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.04059.x Glacial rebound and plate spreading: results from the first countrywide GPS observations in Iceland ∗ T. Arnad´ ottir,´ 1 B. Lund,2 W. Jiang,1 H. Geirsson,3 H. Bjornsson,¨ 4 P. Einarsson4 and T. Sigurdsson5 1Nordic Volcanological Center, Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Iceland, IS-101 Reykjav´ık, Iceland. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Villavagen¨ 16, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden 3Physics Department, Icelandic Meteorological Office, Reykjav´ık, Iceland 4Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Iceland, IS-101 Reykjav´ık, Iceland 5National Land Survey of Iceland, Akranes, Iceland Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/177/2/691/2023257 by guest on 30 September 2021 Accepted 2008 December 10. Received 2008 December 5; in original form 2008 June 12 SUMMARY Iceland is one of the few places on Earth where a divergent plate boundary can be observed on land. Direct observations of crustal deformation for the whole country are available for the first time from nationwide Global Positioning System (GPS) campaigns in 1993 and 2004. The plate spreading across the island is imaged by the horizontal velocity field and high uplift rates (≥10 mm yr−1) are observed over a large part of central and southeastern Iceland. Several earthquakes, volcanic intrusions and eruptions occurred during the time spanned by the measurements, causing local disturbances of the deformation field. After correcting for the largest earthquakes during the observation period, we calculate the strain rate field and find that the main feature of the field is the extension across the rift zones, subparallel to the direction of plate motion.
    [Show full text]
  • Iceland Is Cool: an Origin for the Iceland Volcanic Province in the Remelting of Subducted Iapetus Slabs at Normal Mantle Temperatures
    Iceland is cool: An origin for the Iceland volcanic province in the remelting of subducted Iapetus slabs at normal mantle temperatures G. R. Foulger§1 & Don L. Anderson¶ §Department of Geological Sciences, University of Durham, Science Laboratories, South Rd., Durham, DH1 3LE, U.K. ¶California Institute of Technology, Seismological Laboratory, MC 252-21, Pasadena, CA 91125, U. S. A. Abstract The time-progressive volcanic track, high temperatures, and lower-mantle seismic anomaly predicted by the plume hypothesis are not observed in the Iceland region. A model that fits the observations better attributes the enhanced magmatism there to the extraction of melt from a region of upper mantle that is at relatively normal temperature but more fertile than average. The source of this fertility is subducted Iapetus oceanic crust trapped in the Caledonian suture where it is crossed by the mid-Atlantic ridge. The extraction of enhanced volumes of melt at this locality on the spreading ridge has built a zone of unusually thick crust that traverses the whole north Atlantic. Trace amounts of partial melt throughout the upper mantle are a consequence of the more fusible petrology and can explain the seismic anomaly beneath Iceland and the north Atlantic without the need to appeal to very high temperatures. The Iceland region has persistently been characterised by complex jigsaw tectonics involving migrating spreading ridges, microplates, oblique spreading and local variations in the spreading direction. This may result from residual structural complexities in the region, inherited from the Caledonian suture, coupled with the influence of the very thick crust that must rift in order to accommodate spreading-ridge extension.
    [Show full text]
  • Neotectonics and Long-Term Seismicity in Europe and the Mediterranean Region
    1 2 Neotectonics and long-term seismicity in Europe and the 3 Mediterranean region 4 5 Michele M. C. Carafa (1), Salvatore Barba (2) and Peter Bird (3) 6 1 Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia – INGV, Sezione di Tettonofisica e 7 Sismologia, L’Aquila, Italy. Email: [email protected] 8 2 Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia – INGV, Sezione di Tettonofisica e 9 Sismologia, Rome, Italy. Email: [email protected] 10 3 Department of Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences, University of California, Los 11 Angeles, USA. Email: [email protected] 12 13 Abstract 14 We present a neotectonic model of ongoing lithosphere deformation and a 15 corresponding estimate of long-term shallow seismicity across the Africa-Eurasia plate 16 boundary, including the eastern Atlantic, Mediterranean region, and continental Europe. 17 GPS and stress data are absent or inadequate for the part of the study area covered by 18 water. Thus, we opt for a dynamic model based on the stress-equilibrium equation; this 19 approach allows us to estimate the long-term behavior of the lithosphere (given certain 20 assumptions about its structure and physics) for both land and sea areas. We first update 21 the existing plate model by adding five quasi-rigid plates (the Ionian Sea, Adria, 22 Northern Greece, Central Greece, and Marmara) to constrain the deformation pattern of 23 the study area. We use the most recent datasets to estimate the lithospheric structure. 24 The models are evaluated in comparison with updated datasets of geodetic velocities 25 and the most compressive horizontal principal stress azimuths.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification Key for Pliocene and Quaternary Spiniferites Taxa Bearing Intergonal Processes Based on Observations from Estuarine and Coastal Environments
    PALYNOLOGY 2018, VOL. 42, NO. S1, 72–88 https://doi.org/10.1080/01916122.2018.1465733 Identification key for Pliocene and Quaternary Spiniferites taxa bearing intergonal processes based on observations from estuarine and coastal environments Audrey Limogesa,b, Laurent Londeixc, Kenneth Neil Mertensd,e, Andre Rochonf, Vera Pospelovag, Tomasa Cuellar h and Anne de Vernali aDepartment of Glaciology and Climate, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), Copenhagen, Denmark; bDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of New Brunswick, 2 Bailey Drive, Fredericton, Canada; cUMR 5805 EPOC, CS50023, Allee Geoffroy Saint-Hillaire, Universite de Bordeaux, Pessac Cedex, France; dResearch Unit for Palaeontology Ghent University, Gent, Belgium; eIfremer, LER BO, Station de Biologie Marine, Place de la Croix, Concarneau Cedex, France; fInstitut des sciences de la mer (ISMER), UniversiteduQuebec a Rimouski, Rimouski, Canada; gSchool of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada; hPosgrado en Ciencias del Mar y Limnologıa, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Coyoacan, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico; iDepartement des sciences de la Terre et de l’Atmosphere, Geotop, UniversiteduQuebec a Montreal, Montreal, Canada ABSTRACT KEYWORDS The use of dinoflagellate cyst assemblages as a tool for palaeo-environmental reconstructions strongly Dinoflagellate cyst; relies on the robustness of cyst identification and existing information on the distribution of the differ- taxonomy; description; ent species. To this purpose, we propose a functional key for the identification of Pliocene and morphological variability; emendations Quaternary Spiniferites bearing intergonal processes and depict the range of morphological variation of the different species on the basis of new observations from estuarine and coastal regions. Accordingly, the description of Spiniferites mirabilis is emended to include the new subspecies Spiniferites mirabilis subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mediterranean Region—A Geological Primer
    160 Article by William Cavazza1 and Forese Carlo Wezel2 The Mediterranean region—a geological primer 1 Dept. of Earth and Geoenvironmental Sciences, Univ. of Bologna, Italy. [email protected] 2 Institute of Environmental Dynamics, University of Urbino, Italy. [email protected] The last twenty-five years of geological investigation of the Mediterranean region have disproved the traditional Introduction notion that the Alpine-Himalayan mountain ranges Many important ideas and influential geological models have been originated from the closure of a single, albeit complex, developed based on research undertaken in the Mediterranean oceanic domain—the Tethys. Instead, the present-day region. For example, the Alps are the most studied orogen in the geological configuration of the Mediterranean region is world, their structure has been elucidated in great detail for the most part and has served as an orogenic model applied to other collisional the result of the creation and ensuing consumption of orogens. Ophiolites and olistostromes were defined and studied for two major oceanic basins—the Paleotethys and the the first time in this region. The Mediterranean Sea has possibly the Neotethys—and of additional smaller oceanic basins highest density of DSDP/ODP sites in the world, and extensive within an overall regime of prolonged interaction research on its Messinian deposits and on their on-land counterparts has provided a spectacular example for the generation of widespread between the Eurasian and the African-Arabian plates. basinal evaporites. Other portions of this region are less well under- In greater detail, there is still some debate about exactly stood and are now the focus of much international attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Iberian Plate-Kinematics in Paleomagnetic and Mantle Reference Frames, Gondwana Research (2016), Doi: 10.1016/J.Gr.2016.03.006
    ÔØ ÅÒÙ×Ö ÔØ Cretaceous slab break-off in the Pyrenees: Iberian plate-kinematics in paleo- magnetic and mantle reference frames Reinoud L.M. Vissers, Douwe J.J. van Hinsbergen, Douwe G. van der Meer, Wim Spakman PII: S1342-937X(16)30053-3 DOI: doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2016.03.006 Reference: GR 1599 To appear in: Gondwana Research Received date: 21 September 2015 Revised date: 2 March 2016 Accepted date: 3 March 2016 Please cite this article as: Vissers, Reinoud L.M., van Hinsbergen, Douwe J.J., van der Meer, Douwe G., Spakman, Wim, Cretaceous slab break-off in the Pyrenees: Iberian plate-kinematics in paleomagnetic and mantle reference frames, Gondwana Research (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2016.03.006 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Cretaceous slab break-off in the Pyrenees: Iberian plate- kinematics in paleomagnetic and mantle reference frames Reinoud L.M. Vissers1, Douwe J.J. van Hinsbergen1, Douwe G. van der Meer1,2, Wim Spakman1,3 1 Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 4, Utrecht 3584 CD, Netherlands 2 Nexen Petroleum UK Ltd, 97 Oxford Road, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 1LU, UK 3 Center for Earth Evolution and Dynamics (CEED), University of Oslo, Sem Saelands vei 24, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway corresponding author: Reinoud L.M.
    [Show full text]
  • This Report Is Preliminary and Has Not Bee Reviewed for Conformity with US
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Northeast-trending subcrustal fault transects western Washington by Kenneth F. Fox, Jr.* Open-File Report 83-398 This report is preliminary and has not bee reviewed for conformity with U.S Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. *U.S. Geological Survey 3^5 Middlefield Road Menlo Park, California 9^025 Page Table of Contents Tectonic setting......................................................... 1 Seisraicity............................................................... 4 Discussion............................................................... 4 References cited......................................................... 6 Figures Figure 1. Magnetic anomalies in the northeastern Pacific................ 8 Figure 2. Bathymetry at intersection of Columbia lineament and Blanco fracture zone................................................. 9 Figure 3. Plane vector representation of movement of Gorda plate........ 10 Figure 4. Reconstruction of Pacific-Juan de Fuca plate geometry 2 m.y. before present................................................ 11 Figure 5. Epicenters of historical earthquakes with intensity greater than V........................................................ 12 TECTONIC SETTING The north-trending magnetic anomalies of the Juan de Fuca plate are off­ set along two conspicuous northeast-trending lineaments (fig. 1), named the Columbia offset and the Destruction offset by Carlson (1981). The northeast­ ward projections of these lineaments intersect the continental area of western Washington, hence are of potential significance to the tectonics of the Pacific Northwest region. Pavoni (1966) suggested that these lineaments were left-lateral faults, and that the Columbia, 280 km in length, had 52 km of offset, and the Destruction, with a length of 370 km, had 75 km of offset. Based on Vine's (1968) correlation of the magnetic anomalies mapped in this area by Raff and Mason (1961), with the magnetic reversal time scale, Silver (1971b, p.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction Gondwana
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sydney eScholarship Regional plate tectonic reconstructions of the Indian Ocean Thesis Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Ana Gibbons School of Geosciences 2012 Supervised by Professor R. Dietmar Müller and Dr Joanne Whittaker The University of Sydney, PhD Thesis, Ana Gibbons, 2012 - Introduction DECLARATION I declare that this thesis contains less than 100,000 words and contains no work that has been submitted for a higher degree at any other university or institution. No animal or ethical approvals were applicable to this study. The use of any published written material or data has been duly acknowledged. Ana Gibbons ii The University of Sydney, PhD Thesis, Ana Gibbons, 2012 - Introduction ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisors for their endless encouragement, generosity, patience, and not least of all their expertise and ingenuity. I have thoroughly benefitted from working with them and cannot imagine a better supervisory team. I also thank Maria Seton, Carmen Gaina and Sabin Zahirovic for their help and encouragement. I thank Statoil (Norway), the Petroleum Exploration Society of Australia (PESA) and the School of Geosciences, University of Sydney for support. I am extremely grateful to Udo Barckhausen, Kaj Hoernle, Reinhard Werner, Paul Van Den Bogaard and all staff and crew of the CHRISP research cruise for a very informative and fun collaboration, which greatly refined this first chapter of this thesis. I also wish to thank Dr Yatheesh Vadakkeyakath from the National Institute of Oceanography, Goa, India, for his thorough review, which considerably improved the overall model and quality of the second chapter.
    [Show full text]