Governors and the Executive Branch
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File
Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc. -
Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan
Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding Plan This proposal is a balance of new revenue and reasonable reforms to ensure efficiency, accountability and performance from each dollar invested to improve California’s transportation system. Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding Plan Frequently Asked Questions This proposal is a combination of new revenue and reform with measurable targets for improvements including regular reporting, streamlined projects with exemptions for infrastructure repairs and flexibility on hiring for new workload. How much does this program provide overall for transportation improvements? • Over the next decade, the Governor’s Transportation Funding Plan provides an estimated $36 billion in funding for transportation, with an emphasis on repairing and maintaining existing transportation infrastructure and a commitment to repay an additional $879 million in outstanding loans. How much does it require the average vehicle owner in California to pay? • The proposal equates to roughly 25-cents per motorist per day according to the Department of Finance. The latest TRIP* study released, and subsequent article in the Washington Post, showed that Californians spend on average $762 annually on vehicle repair costs due to wear and tear / road conditions, etc. http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/ wp/2015/06/25/why-driving-on-americas-roads-can-be-more-expensive-than-you-think/ A figure that should go down significantly with improved road conditions. How will the program improve transportation in California over the next decade? • Within 10 years, with this plan, the state has made a commitment to get our roadways up to 90% good condition. Today, 41% of our pavement is either distressed or needs preventative maintenance. -
President - Telephone Calls (2)” of the Richard B
The original documents are located in Box 17, folder “President - Telephone Calls (2)” of the Richard B. Cheney Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 17 of the Richard B. Cheney Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library ,;.._.. ~~;·.~·- .·.· ~-.. .· ..·. ~- . •.-:..:,.:·-. .-~-:-} ·· ~·--· :·~·-.... ~.-.: -~ ·":~· :~.·:::--!{;.~·~ ._,::,.~~~:::·~=~:~;.;;:.;~.;~i8JitA~w~;ri~r·•v:&;·~ ·e--.:.:,;,·.~ .. ~;...:,.~~,·-;;;:,:_ ..• THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON K~ t.l T ..u:. \(. y l\,~~;'"Y # 3 < . ~OTt.~ ~~~ -"P1ltS.tDI!'-'l' ~t&.. c. -y"Ro"&At.&.y vasir Ke'-',.uc..~ty .. ,... -f.le.. tL>e.e..te.NI) 0 ~ Mf'\y l'i, IS. Th\.s will he ~t.\ oF' ~ 3 ' . $ T _,.-c... &~• u~ +~ \\.)t.lvct t. Te~t.>~s••• ,..,.~ fh:.""'''". ORIGINAL . •· . SPECIAL Do RETIRED· TO . · CUMENTS Ftf. .E . ~- .~ ·. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON RECOMMENDED TELEPHONE CALL TO Congressman Tim Lee Carter {Kentucky, 5th District) 225-4601 DATE Prior to May 25 primary in Kentucky RECOMMENDED BY Rog Morton, Stu Spencer PURPOSE To thank the Congressman for his April 5th endorsement and for the assistance of his organization. -
Advocates' Recommendations for California's November 2020 Elections
May 22, 2020 The Honorable Gavin Newsom The Honorable Alex Padilla Governor of California Secretary of State of California State Capitol Building, 1st Floor 1500 11th Street, 6th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: Revised Recommendations for California’s November 2020 Elections Dear Governor Newsom and Secretary of State Padilla: We write to update some elements of our coalition’s April 14 letter. As a group of advocates with many years of experience working to protect and expand voting rights in California, we respectfully submit this set of recommendations to help meet the challenges posed to November’s elections by the coronavirus pandemic. The primary revision to our recommendations is a shift to proposing that the minimum statewide ratio for in-person voting locations should be one for every 10,000 voters starting four days before Election Day. We applaud Governor Newsom’s Executive Order to provide every registered voter a vote-by-mail (VBM) ballot. But as the Governor, the Secretary of State, and legislative leaders have recognized, this is just a starting point. It is vitally important to move forward with the shared understanding that VBM is not a solution for everyone. We must address the risks posed by the potential reduction of in-person locations and expanded reliance on VBM - especially to communities that are underrepresented in our democratic system. These risks are well-documented and supported by data.1 They 1Asian-Americans Advancing Justice, Asian Americans Face Higher than Average Vote-by-Mail Rejection Rates in California (2017), bit.ly/AAAJIssueBrief; Romero, Mindy S., California Civic Engagement Project (CCEP), The California Voter Experience: Why African-American Voters Choose to Vote at the Polls or Vote-by-Mail, and How They Perceive Proposed Changes to California’s Voting System. -
The Warren Court and the Pursuit of Justice, 50 Wash
Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 50 | Issue 1 Article 4 Winter 1-1-1993 The aW rren Court And The Pursuit Of Justice Morton J. Horwitz Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Morton J. Horwitz, The Warren Court And The Pursuit Of Justice, 50 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 5 (1993), https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol50/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington and Lee Law Review at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington and Lee Law Review by an authorized editor of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE WARREN COURT AND THE PURSUIT OF JUSTICE MORTON J. HoRwiTz* From 1953, when Earl Warren became Chief Justice, to 1969, when Earl Warren stepped down as Chief Justice, a constitutional revolution occurred. Constitutional revolutions are rare in American history. Indeed, the only constitutional revolution prior to the Warren Court was the New Deal Revolution of 1937, which fundamentally altered the relationship between the federal government and the states and between the government and the economy. Prior to 1937, there had been great continuity in American constitutional history. The first sharp break occurred in 1937 with the New Deal Court. The second sharp break took place between 1953 and 1969 with the Warren Court. Whether we will experience a comparable turn after 1969 remains to be seen. -
Student's Name
California State & Local Government In Crisis, 6th ed., by Walt Huber CHAPTER 6 QUIZ - © January 2006, Educational Textbook Company 1. Which of the following is NOT an official of California's plural executive? (p. 78) a. Attorney General b. Speaker of the Assembly c. Superintendent of Public Instruction d. Governor 2. Which of the following are requirements for a person seeking the office of governor? (p. 78) a. Qualified to vote b. California resident for 5 years c. Citizen of the United States d. All of the above 3. Which of the following is NOT a gubernatorial power? (p. 79) a. Real estate commissioner b. Legislative leader c. Commander-in-chief of state militia d. Cerimonial and political leader 4. What is the most important legislative weapon the governor has? (p. 81) a. Line item veto b. Full veto c. Pocket veto d. Final veto 5. What is required to override a governor's veto? (p. 81) a. Simple majority (51%). b. Simple majority in house, two-thirds vote in senate. c. Two-thirds vote in both houses. d. None of the above. 6. Who is considered the most important executive officer in California after the governor? (p. 83) a. Lieutenant Governor b. Attorney General c. Secretary of State d. State Controller 1 7. Who determines the policies of the Department of Education? (p. 84) a. Governor b. Superintendent of Public Instruction c. State Board of Education d. State Legislature 8. What is the five-member body that is responsible for the equal assessment of all property in California? (p. -
110Th Congress 17
CALIFORNIA 110th Congress 17 CALIFORNIA (Population 2000, 33,871,648) SENATORS DIANNE FEINSTEIN, Democrat, of San Francisco, CA; born in San Francisco, June 22, 1933; education: B.A., Stanford University, 1955; elected to San Francisco Board of Super- visors, 1970–78; president of Board of Supervisors: 1970–71, 1974–75, 1978; mayor of San Francisco, 1978–88; candidate for governor of California, 1990; recipient: Distinguished Woman Award, San Francisco Examiner; Achievement Award, Business and Professional Women’s Club, 1970; Golden Gate University, California, LL.D. (hon.), 1979; SCOPUS Award for Out- standing Public Service, American Friends of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem; University of Santa Clara, D.P.S. (hon.); University of Manila, D.P.A. (hon.), 1981; Antioch University, LL.D. (hon.), 1983; Los Angeles Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith’s Distinguished Serv- ice Award, 1984; French Legion d’Honneur from President Mitterand, 1984; Mills College, LL.D. (hon.), 1985; U.S. Army’s Commander’s Award for Public Service, 1986; Brotherhood/ Sisterhood Award, National Conference of Christians and Jews, 1986; Paulist Fathers Award, 1987; Episcopal Church Award for Service, 1987; U.S. Navy Distinguished Civilian Award, 1987; Silver Spur Award for Outstanding Public Service, San Francisco Planning and Urban Renewal Association, 1987; All Pro Management Team Award for No. 1 Mayor, City and State Magazine, 1987; Community Service Award Honoree for Public Service, 1987; American Jew- ish Congress, 1987; President’s Award, St. Ignatius High School, San Francisco, 1988; Coro Investment in Leadership Award, 1988; President’s Medal, University of California at San Fran- cisco, 1988; University of San Francisco, D.H.L. -
REPORT to the JUDICIAL COUNCIL for Business Meeting On: February 25, 2011
Judicial Council of California . Administrative Office of the Courts 455 Golden Gate Avenue . San Francisco, California 94102-3688 www.courtinfo.ca.gov REPORT TO THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL For business meeting on: February 25, 2011 Title Agenda Item Type Court Facilities: Naming the New Courthouse Action Required in Long Beach Effective Date Rules, Forms, Standards, or Statutes Affected February 25, 2011 None Date of Report Recommended by January 19, 2011 Executive and Planning Committee Hon. Richard D. Huffman, Chair Contact Kelly Quinn, 818-558-3078 [email protected] Executive Summary The Executive and Planning Committee recommends naming the proposed new trial courthouse to be constructed in the City of Long Beach in honor of former Governor George Deukmejian. Recommendation The Executive and Planning Committee recommends the council name the proposed new courthouse in Long Beach as follows: Governor George Deukmejian Courthouse Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles Previous Council Action On the council’s behalf, the Executive and Planning Committee adopted the attached Courthouse 1 Naming Policy (the naming policy) in May 2009. The council’s naming standards apply to 1 The naming policy was adopted on an interim basis. The Administrative Director of the Courts was asked to report to the council by December 2011 on the implementation of this policy and to make further recommendations on the policy at that time. renovated and newly constructed courthouses that the council has financed, in whole or in part, where the judicial branch is the facility owner or majority tenant. These standards are listed in section III.B. -
Chapter 4 - Direct Democracy in a Hyperpluralistic Age Test Bank
CHAPTER 4 - DIRECT DEMOCRACY IN A HYPERPLURALISTIC AGE TEST BANK MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS 1. The Progressive Era began in A. the early 1800s. B. the mid 1800s. C. the late 1800s. D. the mid 1900s. 2. A reform that allows voters to nominate candidates is the A. direct primary. B. at-large election. C. party caucus. D. recall. 3. The Progressive reforms were designed to A. return power to the national government. B. make government businesslike. C. increase the importance of cities. D. none of the above. 4. Reforms inhibiting influence of political machines include A. initiative. B. recall. C. referendum. D. direct primaries. 5. At-large-elections encourage local candidates to support A. narrow, district-based views. B. democratic views. C. mainly, urban perspectives. D. broader, citywide views. Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 34 Chapter 4: Direct Democracy in a Hyperpluralistic Age 6. California’s Progressives were white and A. lower class. B. upper class. C. middle class. D. working class. 7. In 1910, about sixty percent of California’s population was A. rural. B. suburban. C. urban. D. urban and suburban. 8. California’s Progressives were reformers, not A. liberals. B. radicals. C. socialists. D. conservatives. 9. One of the Progressive leaders who pushed direct democracy as governor was A. Jerry Brown. B. Hiram Johnson C. Culbert Olson. D. Pat Brown. 10. Today the Progressive tradition is fostered by the A. Chambers of Commerce. B. League of Women Voters. C. Legislative Analyst’s Office. D. Conference of Mayors. 11. Today the initiative is used primarily by A. -
Consent Decree #01-11161 CAS RZ for Reimbursement of Response
SFUND RECORDS CTR 2092528 1 JOHN C. CRUDEN Acting Assistant Attorney General 2 Environment and Natural Resources Division LLi BRADLEY R. O'BRIEN, State Bar No. 189425 3 Environmental Enforcement Section Environment and Natural Resources Division CIEBK. U.S. DllpRlCT COURT'? 4 United States Department of Justice 301 Howard Street, Suite 1050 5 San Francisco, CA 94105 NOV 26 2002 Telephone (415) 744-6484 6 Facsimile (415) 744-6476 7 JOHN S. GORDON DEPUTY United States Attorney for the 8 Central District of California LEON W. WEIDMAN 9 Chief, Civil Division 300 North Los Angeles Street 10 Los Angeles, CA 90012 11 NANCY J. MARVEL Regional Counsel 12 THOMAS A. BLOOMFIELD Assistant Regional Counsel Scan Only 13 U, S. Environmental Protection Agency 7E Hawthorne Street ENTERFD n Francisco, CA 94105 CLERK. U S DISTRICT COURT lephone (415) 972-3877 csimile (415) 947-3570 fl/27 2002: CD csa.6 / torneys for Plaintiff United States DISTRICT OF CAUFOTNIA S- IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 01- 1116 1 21 Plaintiff, 22 Civil Action No. v. 23 Consent Decree The STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 24 25 Defendant. r MO roMSTlTUTES NOTICE OF ENTRY 26 i • . .?rDBYFRCP.RULE77ld). 27 28 COM 192672 $ 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 I . BACKGROUND . 3 3 II JURISDICTION . 4 4 III PARTIES BOUND ... 5 5 IV DEFINITIONS .... 5 6 v. SITE BACKGROUND ... 8 7 VI . PURPOSE . 11 8 VII . CASH PAYMENT . 12 9 VIII. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF CONSENT DECREE . 14 10 IX. COVENANT NOT TO SUE BY THE UNITED STATES . -
Lassiter JUH Submission Jan2015
Note to Lunch U.P. group: This is the draft submission of an article that will be coming out later this year in a special issue of the Journal of Urban History on “Rethinking Urban Spaces in the Age of Mass Incarceration,” edited by Heather Thompson and Donna Murch. It’s excerpted from a longer chapter, about ‘juvenile delinquency’ and the federal and state declarations of war on narcotics during the 1950s, from my book project The Suburban Crisis: Crime, Drugs, and the Lost Innocence of Middle-Class America. Thanks in advance for reading this before the discussion. I realize this is fairly different from most of the other aspects of the programming this semester and through a mix-up I didn’t realize until just now that I was on the calendar, so don’t have time to put together a formal presentation. But I will bring the map and images I plan to include with this article, which is not yet in the copyediting phase. Also, please don’t circulate this draft beyond the listserv for this workshop series. Thanks, Matt Lassiter [email protected] Pushers, Victims, and the Lost Innocence of White Suburbia: California’s War on Narcotics during the 1950s Matthew D. Lassiter University of Michigan During the 1950s, neighborhood groups and civic organizations representing more than one million residents of California petitioned the state government for lengthy mandatory- minimum sentences for dope “pushers” who supplied marijuana and heroin to teenagers, with considerable public sentiment for life imprisonment or the death penalty. California’s war on narcotics enlisted a broad and ideologically diverse spectrum, led by nonpartisan alliances such as the California Federation of Women’s Clubs and the statewide PTA network and advanced by Republican and Democratic policymakers alike. -
The Role of Public Universities As Interest Groups
THE ROLE OF PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES AS INTEREST GROUPS IN THE UNITED STATES by Ngo Tu Thanh (Frank Tu) A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of M.A. in Political Science The Department of Political Science Central European University Budapest, Hungary CEU eTD Collection June 2019 Supervisor: Anil Duman © 2020 CEU eTD Collection NGO TU THANH (Frank Tu) ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Ngo Tu Thanh (Frank Tu) THE ROLE OF PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES AS INTEREST GROUPS IN THE UNITED STATES Under the direction of Anil Duman The University of California (UC), the California State University (CSU), and the California Community Colleges (CCC) used to receive approximately the same amount of state funding prior to 1988. However, in recent decades, California has adopted numerous policies that favor the CCC. Predicated upon this empirical observation, this thesis argues that the three systems act as interest groups, lobbying for state funding, and the CCC is the most effective, despite being the larger group. This observation contradicts with Olson’s (1965) “group-size paradox” and poses a theoretical puzzle: “Why are the California community colleges more influential in lobbying despite the collective action problems it may face as a larger group?”. Existing theories suggest three potential answers for this puzzle: 1) types of interest, be it public or private, 2) degree of conflict, and 3) public opinion. By conducting content analyses of secondary sources, this thesis finds that the CCC’s goal is to ensure the affordability of higher education, while the UC seeks to preserve its own reputation and quality at the expense of universal access to and affordability of higher education.