DOCSLIB.ORG

Les Rhinocéros Fossiles Des Sites Préhistoriques De L'europe Méditerranéenne Et Du Massif Central

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Les Rhinocéros Fossiles Des Sites Préhistoriques De L'europe Méditerranéenne Et Du Massif Central Les rhinocéros fossiles des sites préhistoriques de l’Europe méditerranéenne et du Massif Central Paléontologie et implications biochronologiques Frédéric Lacombat BAR International Series 1419 2005 This title published by Archaeopress Publishers of British Archaeological Reports Gordon House 276 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 7ED England [email protected] www.archaeopress.com BAR S1419 Les rhinocéros fossiles des sites préhistoriques de l’Europe méditerranéenne et du Massif Central: Paléontologie et implications biochronologiques © F Lacombat 2005 ISBN 1 84171 858 0 Printed in England by The Basingstoke Press All BAR titles are available from: Hadrian Books Ltd 122 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 7BP England [email protected] The current BAR catalogue with details of all titles in print, prices and means of payment is available free from Hadrian Books or may be downloaded from www.archaeopress.com Sommaire Avant Propos............................................................................................................................................................... iii Remerciements............................................................................................................................................................ iii Chapitre I – Présentation des sites de l’étude 1. Présentation générale des sites majeurs de l’étude ...............................................................................................1 a. La grotte du Vallonnet...........................................................................................................................................1 b. La Pineta à Isernia.................................................................................................................................................4 c. La Caune de l’Arago .............................................................................................................................................4 2. Sites étudiés utilisés en comparaison.......................................................................................................................8 a. Senèze ...................................................................................................................................................................8 b. Cagnes-sur-Mer.....................................................................................................................................................8 c. Sainzelles...............................................................................................................................................................8 d. Ceyssaguet ............................................................................................................................................................8 e. Tour de Grimaldi...................................................................................................................................................8 f. Durfort ...................................................................................................................................................................9 g. Soleilhac................................................................................................................................................................9 h. Aldène...................................................................................................................................................................9 i. Terra Amata ...........................................................................................................................................................9 j. Orgnac III.............................................................................................................................................................10 k. Baume Bonne......................................................................................................................................................10 l. Grotte de Mars .....................................................................................................................................................12 m. Grotte du Prince .................................................................................................................................................12 n. Grotte du Cavillon...............................................................................................................................................13 o. Grotte de l’Observatoire......................................................................................................................................13 p. La Barma Grande................................................................................................................................................13 q. Grotte des Enfants...............................................................................................................................................14 Chapitre II – Etude paléontologique 1. Nomenclature et Taxonomie15 2. Généralités sur les espèces de rhinocéros pléistocènes de l’Europe méditerranéenne et du Massif Centra..l15 3. Introduction à l’étude paléontologique.................................................................................................................17 4. Etude Paléontologique............................................................................................................................................18 a. Crâne ...................................................................................................................................................................18 b. Dents supérieures ................................................................................................................................................24 c. Mandibule ...........................................................................................................................................................42 d. Dents inférieures .................................................................................................................................................42 e. Rangées dentaires................................................................................................................................................61 f. Scapula.................................................................................................................................................................65 g. Humérus..............................................................................................................................................................66 h. Radius .................................................................................................................................................................71 i. Ulna......................................................................................................................................................................72 j. Scaphoïde.............................................................................................................................................................75 k. Semi-lunaire........................................................................................................................................................79 l. Pyramidal.............................................................................................................................................................79 m. Pisiforme............................................................................................................................................................82 n. Trapézoïde...........................................................................................................................................................84 o. Magnum ..............................................................................................................................................................86 i p. Onciforme ...........................................................................................................................................................88 q. Métacarpien II.....................................................................................................................................................91 r. Métacarpien III ....................................................................................................................................................93 s. Métacarpien IV....................................................................................................................................................97 t. Métacarpien V......................................................................................................................................................99 u. Coxal.................................................................................................................................................................102 v. Fémur ................................................................................................................................................................104 w. Tibia.................................................................................................................................................................107 x. Fibula................................................................................................................................................................113
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rapport Sur La Répartition, Entre L'etat Et Les Collectivités Territoriales, Des Monuments Historiques Affectés Au Minist
    Rapport de la commission présidée par M. René Rémond Président de la Fondation nationale des sciences politiques à Jean-Jacques Aillagon, Ministre de la culture et de la communication le lundi 17 novembre 2003 Liberté Egalité Fraternité République Française Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication Le Ministre Paris, le 17 novembre 2003 Par lettre de mission en date du 23 juillet 2003, j'ai demandé à Monsieur RenéRémond, Président de la Fondation nationale des sciences politiques, de réfléchir aux critères permettant de distinguer, parmi les 400 monuments historiques appartenant à l'Etat et affectés au ministère de la culture et de la communication, ceux qui devraient rester propriété de l'Etat, de ceux qui pourraient être transférés, en pleine propriété, aux collectivités locales. Le rapport, rendu public aujourd'hui, constitue, en tous points, un document précieux, puisqu'au delà de la doctrine établie, s'y trouvent jointes des propositions, soit de conservation à l'Etat, soit de transfert, en regard de chaque monument examiné. L'objectif est de confier aux collectivités la pleine responsabilité des monuments qui participent avant tout d'une logique territoriale, et d'améliorer leur mise en valeur dans le cadre d'une gestion de proximité. Ce projet est un des axes du plan national pour le patrimoine, que j'ai présenté en Conseil des ministres le 17 septembre dernier. L'Etat doit quant à lui continuer d'être chargé de la conservation et de la mise en valeur de ces monuments qui sont associés à des événements majeurs de notre histoire nationale, et de ceux dont la notoriété dépasse nos frontières et qui participent à l'image de la France dans le monde.
    [Show full text]
  • First Hominin of Europe
    Vol 452 | 27 March 2008 | doi:10.1038/nature06815 LETTERS The first hominin of Europe Eudald Carbonell1, Jose´ M. Bermu´dez de Castro2, Josep M. Pare´s2,3, Alfredo Pe´rez-Gonza´lez2,4, Gloria Cuenca-Besco´s5, Andreu Olle´1, Marina Mosquera1, Rosa Huguet1, Jan van der Made6, Antonio Rosas6, Robert Sala1, Josep Vallverdu´1, Nuria Garcı´a7,8, Darryl E. Granger9, Marı´a Martino´n-Torres2, Xose´ P. Rodrı´guez1, Greg M. Stock3,10, Josep M. Verge`s1, Ethel Allue´1, Francesc Burjachs1,11, Isabel Ca´ceres1, Antoni Canals1, Alfonso Benito4, Carlos Dı´ez12, Marina Lozano1, Ana Mateos2, Marta Navazo12, Jesu´s Rodrı´guez2, Jordi Rosell1 & Juan L. Arsuaga7,8 The earliest hominin occupation of Europe is one of the most A fragment of hominin mandible and an isolated lower LP4 of the debated topics in palaeoanthropology. However, the purport- same individual were recovered from square I-31 of the TE9C level. edly oldest of the Early Pleistocene sites in Eurasia lack precise The mandible (ATE9-1) consists of the symphyseal region, a portion age control and contain stone tools rather than human fossil of the right corpus from P3 to the alveolus of M1 with an irregular 1–5 remains . Here we report the discovery of a human mandible broken surface, and the basal part of the left corpus from P3 to the associated with an assemblage of Mode 1 lithic tools and faunal level of M1/M2. Some teeth are preserved in situ (Fig. 2 and remains bearing traces of hominin processing, in stratigraphic Supplementary Information).
    [Show full text]
  • Cadre Rouge Doc.Qxd
    Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication Etat - collectivités territoriales : contacts presse un engagement commun Département de en faveur du patrimoine l’information et de la communication Emmanuel Bérard conférence de presse tél. : 01 40 15 83 31 mercredi 17 novembre Fabien Durand 01 40 15 80 05 Direction de l’architecture et du patrimoine Christine de Rouville 01 40 15 35 64 Département de l’information et de la communication www.culture.gouv.fr Communiqué de presse Possibilité de transfert de propriétés de certains monuments historiques de l’Etat aux collectivités territoriales, en application de la loi du 13 août 2004 « libertés et responsabilités locales ». Renaud Donnedieu de Vabres, conformément aux dispositions d’application de la loi de décentralisation « libertés et responsabilités locales », a décidé d’engager la procédure nécessaire à la publication de la liste des Contact presse monuments historiques appartenant à l’Etat, susceptibles Département de d’être transférés aux collectivités territoriales. l’information et de la communication Cette liste doit faire l’objet, avant la fin du mois de décembre, PI=êìÉ=ÇÉ=s~äçáë d’un décret en Conseil d’Etat. TRMMN=m~êáë=`ÉÇÉñ=MN íäK=W=MN=QM=NR=UQ=OV íäÅ=W=MN=QM=NR=UM=TO Ce transfert de propriété se fera sur la base d’un strict volontariat à la demande des collectivités intéressées. Des conventions particulières détermineront au cas par cas les conditions de ces transferts et notamment les modalités de prise en charge des programmes d’investissement nécessaires à la mise en valeur des monuments transférés. Cette liste arrêtée à la suite des conclusions du rapport de la commission Rémond présente une série de monuments transférables dont la mise en valeur est susceptible d’être améliorée par les initiatives locales, notamment les conditions d’ouverture, d’animation et de présentation au public.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliografía – Riferimenti Bibliografici
    STUDII BIOLOGIE 14, 2009.pdf, Flat 4 of 64 - Pages: 6, 7, 01/27/10 06:19 PM 6 Studii şi cercetări, BiologyRhinocerotoidea 14, Bistriţ a,Gill, p. 7-1041872, Bibliography of selected papers... 7 Berkesy Lásló, Berkesy Corina RHINOCEROTOIDEA GILL, 1872 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF SELECTED PAPERS – BIBLIOGRAFYA RÉFÉRENCES BIBLIOGRAPHIQUES – BIBLIOGRAFÍA – RIFERIMENTI BIBLIOGRAFICI Emmanuel M.E. BILLIA* For a more rapid and easy consultation a list of bibliographic references concerning the Rhinocerotoidea Superfamily is proposed. As far as regards to the reference codes included in column on the left see the “Legenda” table. Il nous a paru utile, afin d’assurer une consultation du texte à la fois plus rapide et plus aisée, de proposer ici-même des références bibliographiques concernant la Super-famille Rhinocerotoidea. Pour ce qui a trait au choix des références placées dans la liste de gauche, voir la table des “Legenda”. Para una mas rápida y fácil consultación, se propone aquì una lista bibliográfica sobre la Superfamilia Rhinocerotoidea. Por lo que concerne las claves de referimiento de la columna a la izquierda, veer la tabla ”Legenda”. Dlya bolee bystroy i udobnoy konsul’tazii privoditsya spisok bibliografii nadsemeystva Rhinocerotoidea. Chto kasaetsya kodov, privedennyh v kolonke sleva, smotrite tablizu “Legenda”. Ai fini di una più rapida e agevole consultazione, si è ritenuto utile proporre un elenco di riferimenti bibliografici relativi alla Superfamiglia Rhinocerotoidea. Per quanto concerne i codici di riferimento riportati nella colonna a sinistra, si consulti il quadro ”Legenda”. LEGENDA 1a Rhinocerotidae of the European Paleocene-Eocene 1b Rhinocerotidae of the European Oligo-Miocene 1c Rhinocerotidae of the European Pliocene 2 Rhinocerotidae of the European Pleistocene in general or indet.
    [Show full text]
  • (Zierbena, Bizkaia): a Window Into the Middle Pleistocene in the Northern Iberian Peninsula
    Quaternary Science Reviews 121 (2015) 52e74 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quascirev The Punta Lucero Quarry site (Zierbena, Bizkaia): a window into the Middle Pleistocene in the Northern Iberian Peninsula * Asier Gomez-Olivencia a, b, c, d, , Nohemi Sala d, Diego Arceredillo e, f, g, Nuria García h, d, Virginia Martínez-Pillado i, j, Joseba Rios-Garaizar k, Diego Garate l, Gonzalo Solar m, Inaki~ Libano m a Dept. Estratigrafía y Paleontología, Facultad de Ciencia y Tecnología, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, UPV-EHU. Apdo. 644, 48080 Bilbao, Spain b IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Spain c Equipe de Paleontologie Humaine, UMR 7194, CNRS, Departement de Prehistoire, Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, Musee de l'Homme, 17, Place du Trocadero, 75016 Paris, France d Centro UCM-ISCIII de Investigacion sobre Evolucion y Comportamiento Humanos, Avda. Monforte de Lemos 5 (Pabellon 14), 28029 Madrid, Spain e Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Internacional Isabel I de Castilla, C/ Fernan Gonzalez n 76, 09003 Burgos, Spain f Department of Geology, School of Science, University of Salamanca, 37008 Salamanca, Spain g Laboratorio de Prehistoria, Edificio IþDþi, Universidad de Burgos, Plaza Misael Banuelos~ s/n, 09001 Burgos, Spain h Department of Palaeontology, School of Geological Sciences, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain i Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, School of Science and Technology, Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU), 48940 Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain j ARANZADI Geo-Q, b/ Kortasenebarri s/n, 48940 Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain k CENIEH, Paseo Sierra de Atapuerca, 3, 09002 Burgos, Spain l Arkeologi Museoa, Calzadas de Mallona, 2, 48006 Bilbao, Spain m Edestiaurre Kultur Elkartea, Spain article info abstract Article history: The period between the end of the Early Pleistocene and the mid-Middle Pleistocene (roughly between Received 2 February 2015 1.0 and 0.4 Ma BP) is of great interest in Western Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • New Dating Evidence of the Early Presence of Hominins in Southern
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN New dating evidence of the early presence of hominins in Southern Europe Received: 22 February 2017 Véronique Michel1,2, Chuan-Chou Shen3, Jon Woodhead4, Hsun-Ming Hu3, Chung-Che Wu3, Accepted: 7 August 2017 Pierre-Élie Moullé5, Samir Khatib6, Dominique Cauche6,7,8, Marie-Hélène Moncel8, Patricia Published: xx xx xxxx Valensi8,9, Yu-Min Chou3, Sylvain Gallet2, Anna Echassoux10, François Orange11 & Henry de Lumley6 The frst “Out of Africa” migrations represent a seminal event in the history of humankind. At the gates of Europe, the frst appearance of Hominins is recorded in Georgia, 1.8 million years ago (Ma); however, the picture of migration across the continent remains incomplete. Vallonnet Cave (France) is a Lower Paleolithic prehistoric site with traces of hominin activities including lithic remains and cut-marks on mammal bones. Here, we apply the uranium-lead (U-Pb) methods to two fowstones to date the intervening archaeological levels. The U-Pb data, coupled with paleomagnetic constraints, provide an age range from 1.2 to 1.1 Ma. The results conclusively demonstrate that Vallonnet Cave is one of the oldest European prehistoric sites in France with early hominin occupations associated with an Epivillafranchian fauna. Combined with data from other archaeological sites, the new precise chronology suggests a widespread occupation the Northern Mediterranean to Southwestern Europe at ~1.2 Ma. Our understanding of hominin evolution, hominin migration and cultural change relies fundamentally on the establishment of accurate chronological frameworks. Te earliest evidence of hominin tool manufacture is dated from Kenya and in Ethiopia (Africa) via precise 40Ar/39Ar dating of the Lomekwi 3 (refs 1 and 2) and Gona sites3, 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Pleistocene Leopards in the Iberian Peninsula: New Evidence from Palaeontological and Archaeological Contexts in the Mediterranean Region
    Quaternary Science Reviews 124 (2015) 175e208 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quascirev Pleistocene leopards in the Iberian Peninsula: New evidence from palaeontological and archaeological contexts in the Mediterranean region * Alfred Sanchis a, , Carmen Tormo a, Víctor Sauque b, Vicent Sanchis c, Rebeca Díaz c, Agustí Ribera d, Valentín Villaverde e a Museu de Prehistoria de Valencia, Servei d'Investigacio Prehistorica, DiputaciodeVal encia, Valencia, Spain b Grupo Aragosaurus-IUCA, Departamento de Ciencias de la Tierra, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain c Club d'Espeleologia l'Avern, Ontinyent, Spain d Museu Arqueologic d'Ontinyent i la Vall d'Albaida (MAOVA), Ontinyent, Spain e Departament de Prehistoria i Arqueologia, Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, Spain article info abstract Article history: This study analyses the fossil record of leopards in the Iberian Peninsula. According to the systematic and Received 7 April 2015 morphometric features of new remains, identified mainly in Late Pleistocene palaeontological and Received in revised form archaeological sites of the Mediterranean region, they can be attributed to Panthera pardus Linnaeus 7 July 2015 1758. The findings include the most complete leopard skeleton from the Iberian Peninsula and one of the Accepted 11 July 2015 most complete in Europe, found in a chasm (Avenc de Joan Guiton) south of Valencia. The new citations Available online xxx and published data are used to establish the leopard's distribution in the Iberian Peninsula, showing its maximum development during the Late Pleistocene. Some references suggest that the species survived Keywords: Panthera pardus for longer here (Lateglacial-Early Holocene) than in other parts of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Kapitel 6.Indd
    Cour. Forsch.-Inst. Senckenberg 256 57–69 14 Figs, 3 Tabs Frankfurt a. M., 15. 11. 2006 Pleistocene Rhinoceroses in Mediterranean Europe and in Massif Central (France) With 14 fi gs, 3 tabs Frédéric LACOMBAT Abstract This work presents the palaeontological study of four Plio-Pleistocene species of the genus Stephanorhinus, which occurred in twenty sites scattered throughout Mediterranean Europe and the Massif Central. These species are S. etruscus (Senèze, Upper Valdarno), S. hundsheimensis (Sainzelles, Ceyssaguet, Soleilhac, Durfort, Vallonnet cave, Tour de Grimaldi, Cagnes-sur-Mer and Isernia), S. hemitoechus (Caune de l’Arago, Mars cave, Orgnac 3, Baume Bonne, Terra Amata, Prince cave, Cavillon cave, Observatoire cave and Barma Grande) and S. kirchbergensis (Aldène, Prince Cave and the Grotte des Enfants). The Vallonnet cave, Isernia La Pineta and Caune de l’Arago have provided particularly important contributions to our knowledge of European rhinoceroses. They have yielded remains of a small rather primitive S. hundsheim- ensis, of an advanced S. hundsheimensis and of S. hemitoechus, respectively. Morphological and biometric characteristics are outlined to illustrate the differences separating these species. Variations in size during the Pleistocene are also described. S. etruscus is characterised by a steady decrease in its size throughout time. In contrast, both S. hundsheimensis and S. hemitoechus demonstrate irregular size modifi cations: small Early Pleistocene S. hundsheimensis representatives are followed by larger Middle Pleistocene ones, whereas S. hemitoechus shows marked fl uctuations in size, with the earliest and the most recent forms being larger than the intervening ones. Thanks to these fl uctuations in size, Pleistocene rhinoceroses may result very helpful biochronological tools.
    [Show full text]
  • Moulages De Parures Préhistoriques P
    SOMMAIRE Moulages de crânes d’Hominidés fossiles p. 3 Moulages de faunes actuelles p. 12 Moulages de faunes quaternaires p. 14 Moulages d’industries et d’armes préhistoriques p. 18 Moulages de céramiques p. 24 Moulages de parures préhistoriques p. 26 Moulages d’art mobilier paléolithique p. 28 Moulages d’objets p. 34 Moulages de sols d’occupation et de sépultures préhistorique p. 37 Les formations de techniques de moulage p. 40 Index des sites mentionnés dans ce catalogue p. 44 Comment commander p. 79 2 Moulages d’hominidés fossiles 3 Primates Crâne + mandibule Mandibule Mandibule Mandibule (en 3 parties) Aegyptopithecus zeuxis Gigantopithecus blacki Dolichopithecus ruscinensis Dryopithecus fontani Le Fayoum Grotte de Juyuandong Serrat d'En Vaquer 95 € Egypte Liucheng - Chine France 135 € 125 € 95 € Crâne et mandibule « Jordi » Crâne « Jordi » Mandibule « Jordi » CLI 18000 CLI 18000 CLI 18000 Dryopithecus laietanus Dryopithecus laietanus Dryopithecus laietanus Sabadell - Espagne Sabadell - Espagne Sabadell - Espagne 335 € 250 € 95 € Paranthropes Crâne « The black skull » Mandibule OMO 18 Crâne SK 48 Crâne « Zinj » KNM-WT 17000 Paranthropus aethiopicus Paranthropus robustus OH5 Paranthropus aethiopicus Shungura Swartkrans Paranthropus boisei East Rudolf/West Turkana Ethiopie Afrique du sud Olduvai Kenya 125 € 350 € Tanzanie 350 € 350 € Australopithèques Mandibule « Lucy » Crâne STW 252 Crâne « Miss Pless » Crâne + mandibule. Crâne « Karabo » al 288 – 1 i/j/k Australopithecus STS 5 + endocrâne MH1 Australopithecus afarensis africanus Australopithecus
    [Show full text]
  • Francesco D'errico LIST of PUBLICATIONS
    Francesco d’Errico Francesco d’Errico LIST OF PUBLICATIONS 1. Monographs Monographs in preparation Backwell, L., d’Errico, F., Kalahari San material culture: Ancestral knowledge shared by elders at Museum Africa. Published Monographs 1) d’Errico, F. 2003. Néandertaliens et hommes anatomiquement modernes : des trajectoires parallèles vers la modernité culturelle. Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches. Bordeaux : Université Bordeaux 1, pp. 186. 2) Bosinki G., d’Errico, F., Schiller P. 2001. Die Gravierten Frauendarstellungen von Gönnersdorf. Der Magdalenien-Fundplatz Gönnersdorf, Band 8. Franz Steiner Verlag GMBH. Stuttgart 364 pp., 233 figs., 197 planches h.t. 3) d’Errico, F. 1995. L'art gravé azilien. De la technique à la signification. XXXIème Supplément à Gallia-Préhistoire. Paris : CNRS Editions, 329 pp. 2. Edited Monographs 1) Henshilwood, Ch. et d’Errico F. (Eds.) 2011. Homo symbolicus: the dawn of language, imagination and spirituality. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 2) d’Errico, F., Hombert J.-M. (Eds.) 2009. Becoming eloquent. Advances on the emergence of language, human cognition, and modern cultures. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 3) d’Errico, F. et L. Backwell (Eds). 2005. From tools to symbols. From Early Hominids to Modern Humans. Johannesburg: Wits University Press. 4) Zilhão J. & d’Errico, F. 2003 (Eds.) The Chronology of the Aurignacian and of the Transitional Technocomplexes. Dating, Stratigraphies, Cultural Implications. Portuguese Institute of Archaeology (IPA) monographs series Trabalhos de Arqueologia. 5) Giacobini G. & d’Errico, F. (Eds.), 1986: I cacciatori neandertaliani, Jaca Book: Milano. 3. Articles in peer reviewed journals (• journals wiht impact factor) • Backwell, L., Bradfield, J., Carlson, K.J., Jashashvili, T., Wadley, L., d’Errico, F. 2017 en révision.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Hominid Dispersals: a Technological Hypothesis for ``Out Of
    Quaternary International 223-224 (2010) 36e44 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quaint Early hominid dispersals: A technological hypothesis for “out of Africa” Eudald Carbonell a, Robert Sala Ramos a,*, Xosé Pedro Rodríguez a, Marina Mosquera a, Andreu Ollé a, Josep María Vergès a, Bienvenido Martínez-Navarro a,b, José María Bermúdez de Castro c a Institut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social (IPHES). Àrea de Prehistòria, Universitat Rovira i Virgili. Avgda. Catalunya, 35. 43002 Tarragona, Spain b ICREA. Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Spain c Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre Evolución Humana (CENIEH), Burgos, Spain article info abstract Article history: Homo is the only genus that responds to environmental pressures by adopting such strategies as non- Available online 25 February 2010 standardized behaviour, a general diet, and technology. Considering that basic idea, this paper intro- duces the general hypothesis that the Pliocene and Early Pleistocene Homo dispersals within and out of Africa were consequences of that human characteristic behaviour. In particular, they were driven by a process starting with the emergence of technology, followed in a second phase by its socialization. From this point, social reorganization within communities (changing behaviours and social, cultural and economic strategies) occurred, driving demographic growth, and frequently geographic expansion. Ó 2010 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction et al., 2002), and H. antecessor may have an Eurasian origin (Carbonell et al., 2005). Therefore, the extent to which technology The end of the twentieth century witnessed increasing interest influenced hominin dispersals is the purpose of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Background to Neanderthal Presence in Western Mediterranean Europe
    Quaternary Science Reviews 217 (2019) 7e44 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quascirev Background to Neanderthal presence in Western Mediterranean Europe * Jose S. Carrion a, , Michael J. Walker b a Departamento de Biología Vegetal, Universidad de Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain b Departamento de Zoología y Antropología Física, Universidad de Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain article info abstract Article history: This paper provides a background to Neanderthal presence in Western Mediterranean Europe. Habitual Received 18 April 2018 tool-use underpinned human survival in late Early Pleistocene western Mediterranean Europe. By the Received in revised form onset of the early Middle Pleistocene, early humans (descendants of Homo antecessor in all likelihood) 21 August 2018 were exploiting diverse biotopes, sometimes (perhaps often) attaining primary access to large game, and Accepted 10 October 2018 deploying a variety of stone artifacts and rock types, which implies not only manual dexterity but also Available online 22 November 2018 technical competence and cognitive versatility. Late Early Pleistocene human behaviour foreshadowed that of Middle Pleistocene pre-Neanderthal humans whose background conceivably had deep regional Keywords: Human evolution roots. By the mid-Middle Pleistocene Homo heidelbergensis, some of whose anatomical features herald Palaeoanthropology Neanderthal morphology, was exploiting a wide range of natural resources in western Mediterranean Archaeology environments, including small game and plants. Neanderthal morphology began to emerge during the Palaeoecology second half of the Middle Pleistocene, accompanied by increasing technological diversity and an Palaeolithic expanding variety of small tools, conjecturally favoured by hafting, perhaps following development of Quaternary wooden spears (or other tools) and adhesive and binding technologies, and generation and heat-control Europe of fire (which undoubtedly was necessary for activities inside Bruniquel cave).
    [Show full text]