DOCSLIB.ORG

Arts and Cultural Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arts and Cultural Plan Artisit Cheryl Foster installing art at Market Building | Photo courtesy of Stephanie Doyle Roanoke Arts Commission The Arts and Cultural Plan was developed under the leadership of the Roanoke Arts Commission with the engagement of area residents, artists, and arts and cultural organization leaders. Roanoke City Council Mayor David A. Bowers Vice-Mayor David B. Trinkle William D. Bestpitch Raphael E. Ferris Sherman P. Lea Anita J. Price Court G. Rosen Chris Morrill, City Manager Brian Townsend, Assistant City Manager for Community Development Sherman Stovall, Assistant City Manager for Operations Roanoke Arts Commission Partner Organizations Nathan Harper, Chair Arts Council of the Blue Ridge Patice Holland, Vice Chair Rhonda Morgan, Executive Director Sandra K. Brunk Council of Community Services Dr. Rupert Cutler Pam Kestner, President Dr. Frank J. Eastburn Downtown Roanoke Incorporated Susan Egbert Sean Luther, President Charlene Graves Roanoke Civic Center Douglas Jackson Robyn Schon, General Manager Lucy Lee Roanoke Valley Allegheny Regional Commission Taliaferra Logan Wayne Strickland, Executive Director Kathleen W. Lunsford Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau David Mickenberg Landon Howard, Executive Director Dr. Tom McKeon Amy Moorefield Project Team Greg Webster Tom Carr, Director Planning, Building and Development Sara Cole, Council of Community Services Roanoke City Planning Commission Rupert Cutler, Roanoke Arts Commission Angela S. Penn, Chair Chris Chittum, AICP, Planning Administrator Lora J. Katz, Vice Chair Nathan Harper, Roanoke Arts Commission Mark K. Futrell Douglas Jackson, Roanoke Arts Commission Kermit (Kit) Hale Susan Jennings, Arts and Culture Coordinator Henry Scholz Dan Merenda, Council of Community Services Chad A. VanHyning Frederick M. Williams Consultation and Review Provided by John McCann, Partners in Performance Special thanks to the hundreds of citizens, artists, gallery owners, neighborhood leaders and business leaders who participated in meetings and surveys and provided the input and ideas that made this plan possible. Adopted by City Council, August 15,2011 For further information, www.roanokeva.gov/arts plan PAGE 2 Zierle and Carter at the Marginal Arts Festival | Photo courtesy of Dexter Lynn Kingery Introduction .........................................................................................................................................5 Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................................6 Looking Back: The Past as Prologue .........................................................................................8 Building Blocks of the Plan ...........................................................................................................11 • Vibrant Region – Healthy Economy........................................................................................ 12 • Livable Communities – Engaged Neighborhoods ...............................................................14 • People – Education – Lifelong Learning ...............................................................................16 Implementation, Regional Cooperation and Solutions ........................................................18 Appendices ....................................................................................................................................... 20 • Roanoke Art and Cultural Plan Resources and References ............................................... 20 • Arts and Cultural Survey Synopsis ..........................................................................................22 • Glossary of Terms ......................................................................................................................25 • Acronyms with complete organizational names ................................................................. 26 • Roanoke Arts, Cultural and Partner Organizations ..............................................................27 • Roanoke Arts and Cultural Funding 2002–2011 ................................................................. 30 • Possible Actions as generated from public meetings and focus groups ........................ 31 PAGE 3 Thanks to all those individuals who attended our meetings! PAGE 4 Introduction Over the course of the past year information was gathered The last of the three issues emerges through data, focus group to develop this Arts and Cultural Plan from five focus groups and public meetings feedback in the realization that all parts of artists, patrons of the arts, senior executives and board of the arts and cultural community need to work together to members representing arts and cultural organizations and find innovative andcreative solutions. Difficult economic Roanoke Arts Commission members. Eleven public meetings times may create a “circle the wagons” response among some, were held to seek recommendations regarding direction and to but for the majority who have participated in the creation share progress as the plan began to take shape. A survey was of this plan, there is a realization, a willingness and even an conducted with over 1,200 respondents providing suggestions urgency to work together to sustain and build support for high regarding arts and cultural offerings and opportunities in the performing organizations and institutions. The plan suggests Roanoke area. Over twenty-five other arts and cultural plans that by working together organizations, institutions, the private were examined to identify best practices, and Partners in sector and government can expand support, grow audience Performance!, a highly respected firm specializing in strategic participation and create new art and cultural offerings. This planning and building sustainable collaborations among the Arts and Cultural Plan calls for viewing audiences as citizens, arts and cultural organizations was engaged to help interpret rather than consumers to increase participation, and for data and provide a professional review of the plan. leveraging government aid to grow funding from all sectors of our society to support arts and cultural activities in Roanoke. As information was analyzed, three closely related issues emerged as dominant and are now a common theme In this time of limited resources, this plan does not propose embedded in the substance of this plan for Arts and Culture. new or additional City funding to support arts and culture in The first of these issues issynergy . Whether it was a member the Roanoke area. Rather, it recommends strategies such as of the general public, an artist, organization executive or board collaboration in areas of marketing and ticketing, building member, there was a general recognition that by working partnerships within and among sectors and working together together the collective effort could and would achieve more in ways that will result in more efficient use of city funding and than the sum of all individual efforts. There were repeated resources to accomplish outcomes that would not otherwise requests for combined effort in areas such as marketing, be possible. It also recommends looking at collaborative ticketing, scheduling and easily accessible shared calendars of efforts among all agencies that provide financial support events. to streamline the application process and explore how to maximize available funds to accomplish the goals of this plan. Collaboration is the second of the emergent issues. Feedback The plan also recognizes that its goals cannot be achieved from focus groups indicated the need to find ways for without strong support from the private and business sectors, organizations, institutions and neighborhood groups to work and recommends investigating methods of providing new together to achieve common goals. Information gathered funding for arts and culture. indicated concern about redundancy of efforts and services provided by the organizations serving the Roanoke area. In Arts and culture are as important to sustaining Roanoke as addition there was concern that organizations facing difficult a vibrant city as are streets or parks. The coordinated and economic circumstance were increasing fundraising efforts and combined effort detailed in this plan creates the synergy competing for resources that were not necessarily targeted to needed to help sustainable organizations succeed because their missions. A divide was also evident between support for area residents benefit from increased opportunity to downtown activity and support for arts and cultural activities participate in arts and cultural activities. in neighborhoods. This tension indicates an opportunity and need for increased collaboration between organizations based in the downtown area and neighborhood groups and the Nathan L. Harper, Chair faith based community. This Arts and Cultural Plan looks to Roanoke Arts Commission better utilization of neighborhood parks, schools and places of worship and supports stronger relationships and links to provide all residents with access to arts and culture. PAGE 5 The City of Roanoke has a long and distinguished record of investing in quality of life amenities that make the Roanoke Valley a region of choice. Strategic and catalytic investments such as Center in the Square and the greenway trail system continue to leverage private dollars, attract businesses and cultivate a professional and educated workforce. These investments and others constitute milestones in a broad plan for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CSU Student Eastside Parks Study
    EASTSIDE PARKS Connection | Activation | Community Presented by: TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Project Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 I. Study Area Background ............................................................................................................................................... 6 II. Community Engagement, Project Focus, & Essential Tasks ................................................................................... 20 III. Plan ........................................................................................................................................................................... 29 IV. Implementatoin ...................................................................................................................................................... 88 V. References .............................................................................................................................................................. 90 VI. Appendices ............................................................................................................................................................. 94 ii Eastside Parks |Connection | Activation | Community I. PROJECT INTRODUCTION Project Background East Side Parks is the centerpiece of the 2020 Planning Studio course offered by the Levin College of Urban Affairs, Cleveland State University, for its Master of Urban Planning
    [Show full text]
  • Arts, Culture and Media 2010 a Creative Change Report Acknowledgments
    Immigration: Arts, Culture and Media 2010 A Creative Change Report Acknowledgments This report was made possible in part by a grant from Unbound Philanthropy. Additional funding from the Carnegie Corporation of New York, Ford Foundation, Four Freedoms Fund, and the Open Society Foundations supports The Opportunity Agenda’s Immigrant Opportunity initiative. Starry Night Fund at Tides Foundation also provides general support for The Opportunity Agenda and our Creative Change initiative. Liz Manne directed the research, and the report was co-authored by Liz Manne and Ruthie Ackerman. Additional assistance was provided by Anike Tourse, Jason P. Drucker, Frances Pollitzer, and Adrian Hopkins. The report’s authors greatly benefited from conversations with Taryn Higashi, executive director of Unbound Philanthropy, and members of the Immigration, Arts, and Culture Working Group. Editing was done by Margo Harris with layout by Element Group, New York. This project was coordinated by Jason P. Drucker for The Opportunity Agenda. We are very grateful to the interviewees for their time and willingness to share their views and opinions. About The Opportunity Agenda The Opportunity Agenda was founded in 2004 with the mission of building the national will to expand opportunity in America. Focused on moving hearts, minds, and policy over time, the organization works closely with social justice organizations, leaders, and movements to advocate for solutions that expand opportunity for everyone. Through active partnerships, The Opportunity Agenda uses communications and media to understand and influence public opinion; synthesizes and translates research on barriers to opportunity and promising solutions; and identifies and advocates for policies that improve people’s lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Partnership for a LIVABLE ROANOKE VALLEY PLAN Promoting Economic Opportunity and Quality of Life in the Roanoke Valley
    Partnership for a LIVABLE ROANOKE VALLEY PLAN Promoting Economic Opportunity and Quality of Life in the Roanoke Valley SUMMARY IO Final February 2014 REG NA HEALTH CARE REGIONAL A L TE P STRENGTHS EDUCATION LIVABILITY F BO TOUR A S O T IE CR R TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE T IES OF RO A N IT AN I T U C O G K O E F N COMMUNITY REGIONAL ARTS C A R N A LIVABLE E D N FUTURE VALUES INDUSTRY DATA S K R A ROANOKE L L I E N M S OUTDOORS ACADEMICS WELLNESS VALLEY R H O A PRIORITIES COLLABORATION I N P O K E RESOURCES ENVIRONMENT Cover image source: Kurt Konrad Photography Back cover image source: Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau SUMMARY LIVABLE ROANOKE VALLEY PLAN My time as Chair of the Partnership for a Livable Roanoke Valley has been eye opening. We have learned detailed information about our region’s strengths and weaknesses. We have studied service organizations, businesses, and local, commonwealth, and federal programs to really understand what’s available in the Roanoke Region. We have asked “what does the future hold for the Roanoke Valley of Virginia” and “how can we ensure a strong quality of life in our communities?” The Partnership for a Livable Roanoke Valley is an initiative of seven local governments and more than 60 organizations in the Roanoke Valley. The initiative seeks to promote economic opportunity and a greater quality of life for all Roanoke Valley residents through the development of the area’s first regional plan for livability.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia's Blue Ridge Roanoke Valley
    James River Water Trail public access 611 er iv R Craig 220 s Creek e m a J Arcadia James River43 635 Water Trail 614 630 public access Exit 167 J James River am Water Trail e s R public access iv er Buchanan 606 638 43 81 New Castle 600 11 George Washington Fincastle and Je?erson? National Forest 606 606 630 640 220 Parkway 11 Milepost 86 Peaks of Otter Bedford Reservoir 43 Greenfield 220 Botetourt Sports Complex ail Tr ian ppalach A y Troutville wa ark e P idg e R Blu VISITVABLUERIDGE.COM Daleville DOWNTOWN ROANOKE BLACK DOG SALVAGE 902 13th St. SW B2 21 Orange Ave. McAfee ac 6 DOWNTOWN Appal hian GREATER Roanoke, VA 24016 4 Area code is 540 unless otherwise noted. A Knob Trail B C t 460 xi 540.343.6200 BlackDogSalvage.com E n THINGS TO DO/RECREATION A Southwest Virginia’s Premier Destination p Exit 150 ROANOKE ROANOKE p see Virginia’s for Architectural Antiques & Home Décor. 17 Center in the Square 28 a Blue Ridge Map lac Madison Ave. centerinthesquare.org 342-5700 hi on reverse 902 13th St. SW Roanoke, VA 24016 4 an Trail Blue Ridge 311 Explore 40,000 square feet of Treasures 18 Downtown Roanoke Inc. Carvins Cove from Around the World. Reclaiming and VALLEY alt downtownroanoke.org 342-2028 Reservoir Renewing Salvage is our Passion! Antique Bedford Rec Site 2 Harris Wrought Iron, Stained Glass, Mantels, on Ave 19 Harrison Museum of African American Culture 220 t. 1 SALVAGE .com Garden Statuary, Doors, Vintage House S harrisonmuseum.com 857-4395 h Parts and much more.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Long Range Transportation Plan
    TRANSPORTATION PLAN TRANSPORTATION RURAL LONG RANGE LONG RURAL 2035 www.virginiadot.org www.rvarc.org important transportation initiatives in your area. your in initiatives transportation important this and other other and this regarding information additional find to website VDOT the visit Please ALLEGHANY COUNTY Roanoke Roanoke Vinton Vinton COUNTY Salem Clifton Forge Salem ROANOKE ROANOKE Covington COUNTY BOTETOURT CRAIG COUNTY COUNTY CRAIG BOTETOURT COUNTY ROANOKE VALLEY-ALLEGHANY REGIONAL COMMISSION 2035 RURAL LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Covington Covington ROANOKE Clifton Forge Clifton COUNTY Salem Forge Clifton Roanoke Vinton COUNTY ALLEGHANY ALLEGHANY 2011 ROANOKE VALLEY-ALLEGHANY REGIONAL COMMISSION 1 ROANOKE VALLEY-ALLEGHANY REGIONAL COMMISSION VIRGINIA TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION AND PUrpose TransporTATion SysTem PERFORMANCE & RECOMMENDATIONS OVERVIEW OF THE REGION Roadways Description and Function of the Safety Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission Operations and Maintenance Summary of Transportation Network Capacity Goals and Objectives Public Transportation Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities DEMOGRAPHIC AND LAND USE TRENDS Airports Relationship of Land Use and Development to Transportation Goods Movement Population Trends Land Use and Future Growth Transportation Implications Travel Demand Management Demographic Trends PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Roadways PLAN ADOPTION Public Transportation Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities REFERENCES Airports Goods Movement Land Use Travel Demand Management
    [Show full text]
  • SURDNA FOUNDATION ANNUAL REPORT 10 TABLE of of TABLE What Wewhat Fund
    20SURDNA FOUNDATION ANNUAL REPORT 10 TABLE OF CONTENTS Year in Review ............................................ 3 About the Surdna Foundation .................... 5 What We Fund ............................................ 6 Sustainable Environments ...........................................6 Strong Local Economies Program ................................7 Thriving Cultures ....................................................... 8 Foundation Initiatives ................................................ 9 Financial Highlights ................................. 10 2010 Approved Grants .............................. 12 Sustainable Environments ........................................ 12 Strong Local Economies ........................................... 19 Effective Citizenry .....................................................27 Thriving Cultures ..................................................... 32 Surdna Arts Teachers Fellowship Program (SATF) ......................................37 Nonprofit Sector ...................................................... 38 Leadership ................................................ 42 WWW.SURDNA.ORG 2 | Table of Contents YEAR IN REVIEW By Phillip W. Henderson & Josephine B. Lowman Andrus and the 400+ living Andrus family members for the work of creating positive social change. We at Surdna are proud to Over the past three years, we have sharpened Surdna’s focus and re- be a family institution, and we tooled our programs in an effort to position the foundation to face- down this generation’s social
    [Show full text]
  • 6518534514.Pdf
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) 2006 Quadrennial Regulatory Review – Review ) MB Docket No. 06-121 of the Commission’s Broadcast Ownership ) Rules and Other Rules Adopted Pursuant to ) Section 202 of the Telecommunications ) Act of 1996 ) ) 2002 Biennial Regulatory Review – Review ) MB Docket No. 02-277 of the Commission’s Broadcast Ownership ) Rules and Other Rules Adopted Pursuant to ) Section 202 of the Telecommunications ) Act of 1996 ) ) Cross-Ownership of Broadcast Stations ) MM Docket No. 01-235 and Newspapers ) ) Rules and Policies Concerning Multiple ) MM Docket No. 01-317 Ownership of Radio Broadcast Stations ) in Local Markets ) ) Definition of Radio Markets ) MM Docket No. 00-244 COMMENTS OF MEDIA GENERAL, INC. (Volume 3: Convergence Market Media, Appendices 9-14) . John R. Feore, Jr. Michael D. Hays M. Anne Swanson Daniel A. Kirkpatrick Dow Lohnes PLLC 1200 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036-6802 (202) 776-2534 Its Attorneys October 23, 2006 Appendix 9 TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG (SARASOTA), FL (DMA 12) 2006 TELEVISION Full-Power Commercial Stations 12 Full-Power Commercial Station Owners 12 Full-Power Non-Commercial Stations 2 Full-Power Non-Commercial Station Owners 2 Class A Stations 7 Class A Station Owners 7 Number Rebroadcasting Full Power Stations 0 Class A New Station Applications 0 Non-Class A Low Power TV Stations (three silent STAs) 11 Non-Class A Low Power TV Station Owners 9 Number Rebroadcasting Full Power TV Stations 4 Non-Class A Low Power TV
    [Show full text]
  • A Shared Multi-Disciplinary Creativity Requirement for First Year Students
    Student Success ISSN: 2205-0795 Volume 9, Issue 2, pp. 95-100 March 2018 Engaging first-year students through a shared multi- disciplinary, creativity requirement. A Practice Report Marilyn Plotkins Suffolk University, Boston, United States Abstract Even though interest in embedding creativity into tertiary curricula has grown internationally, little scholarship exists about implementation strategies or the efficacy of linking creativity pedagogies to first-year experience programs. This practice report describes how Suffolk University in Boston, Massachusetts, inserted a new creativity requirement for first-year students as a part of curriculum reform in the College of Arts and Sciences and in the Sawyer Business School in spite of considerable resistance. It will demonstrate the uniqueness of the approach and suggest anticipated outcomes in advance of a comprehensive assessment process now underway. Please cite this article as: Plotkins, M. (2018). Engaging first-year students through a shared multi-disciplinary, creativity requirement. A Practice Report. Student Success, 9(2), 95-100. doi: 10.5204/ssj.v9i2.423 This practice report has been accepted for publication in Student Success. Please see the Editorial Policies under the ‘About’ section of the Journal website for further information. Student Success: A journal exploring the experiences of students in tertiary education This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. As an open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution,
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Self-Study
    PREFACE This self-study is being undertaken during a critical time in the University’s history. Frostburg State University is experiencing a number of important transitions. During the spring 2005 semester, Dr. Catherine R. Gira announced that she will be retiring on June 30, 2006, after serving as president for fifteen years. The University is also undergoing a revision of its mission statement. Although there is no substantive change, the process has focused attention on those characteristics that help to make FSU distinctive. In addition, a significant percentage of faculty members and staff are approaching retirement age. Through their dedication to the institution, their work ethic, and their commitment to students, these individuals have played an enormous role in shaping the qualities that define the institution described in this self-study. The recruitment of new faculty and staff is a major challenge facing the institution. Linking planning with strategic resource allocation has been particularly difficult during a period of statewide cost containment; however, the University has become much more thoughtful and systematic in its efforts to engage in meaningful assessment. The assessment of student learning is a cornerstone of the University’s recent revision of its undergraduate curriculum. Finally, in the past few years considerable emphasis has been given to forming partnerships with the private sector, state agencies, and various community and regional groups in an effort to make a more substantive contribution to the region’s economic, social, and cultural development. As Frostburg State prepares to welcome a new president, it is hoped that this document will serve as a valuable planning blueprint.
    [Show full text]
  • Nurturing Tomorrow's Doc Storytellers
    Nurturing Tomorrow’s Doc Storytellers American University Washington, DC September 17-18, 2006 Centerforsocialmedia.org Centerforsocialmedia.wikispaces.com Funded by the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY At “Nurturing Tomorrow’s Doc Storytellers,” a convening of teachers and mentors of documentary film practice held on September 17-18, participants discussed the opportunities provided by changing business and technological practice to teach next generations of documentary filmmakers. Social documentary is a vibrant zone of today’s public media, contributing to public knowledge and action. Films such as Fahrenheit 9/11, An Inconvenient Truth, and ENRON: The Smartest Guys in the Room have all played powerful roles in engaging publics. Projects such as the nationwide StoryCorps project featured on public radio and the Murmur Project in Toronto demonstrate the emerging strength of participatory media. As the opportunities to make social documentary expand, so do the opportunities and challenges that teachers and mentors of the practice face. In this meeting, participants identified key challenges, leading opportunities and potential areas of action and coordination. The greatest opportunities of the moment, participants concluded, lie in more information-sharing that can socialize knowledge being generated in many programs across the country. CHALLENGES What are today’s challenges for those cultivating the next generation of public media makers? Participants identified them in the following areas: Ethics of
    [Show full text]
  • LSA Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Strategic Plan Here
    OCTOBER 2018 UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN COLLEGE OF LITERATURE, SCIENCE, AND THE ARTS Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Strategic Plan This is a working document that will be updated regularly over the next five years. Our ability to implement and complete the strategic goals described here will depend in part on the availability of funding and other resources. 2 INDEX 4 LSA Mission and Vision 5 Statement of Commitment 6 LSA Planning Process 10 Introduction and Overview 15 LSA Strategic Plan Initiatives and Metrics for Success 16 Faculty 23 Undergraduate Student Access 28 Inclusive Classrooms and Pedagogy 38 Undergraduate Education Initiatives 49 Graduate Education 53 Staff 57 Appendices A–H 3 MISSION Through a top-ranked liberal arts education VISION outfitted by a uniquely ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE robust and spirited Our commitment to academic excellence starts with recruiting and retaining world-class faculty across the humanities, the natural sciences, research university, LSA and the social sciences so that our students are engaged with a modern prepares students with curriculum taught by leading experts in their fields. It extends to stress a collaborative approach where all of our tenure-track faculty teach pragmatic, durable skills undergraduates, and where students and faculty contribute original that hold their value for knowledge within and across disciplines. We take pride in the fact that 35 percent of LSA faculty have appointments in others schools and a lifetime. colleges—broadening students’ perspectives and enhancing their understanding of classroom concepts. ACCESS One of our highest priorities is to see that top students who come from economically disadvantaged backgrounds, from under-resourced high schools, from underrepresented minority groups, and from small rural districts have the same opportunities to come to LSA and succeed as those who come from high schools that offer AP classes, fully stocked science labs, and class trips abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Roanoke Valley- Alleghany
    REGION 5 Roanoke Valley- Alleghany North Mountain, Alleghany Highlands | Chuck Almarez CHAPTER 13 Regional Recommendations Region 5 • Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Dragon’s Tooth on the Appalachian Trail | Sam Dean/Virginia Tourism Corp. Introduction Table 5.2 Top 10 Outdoor Recreation Activities By Participation The Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Recreational Planning Region includes the counties of Alleghany, Botetourt, Craig and Roanoke, Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Recreational Planning Region the cities of Covington, Roanoke and Salem, and the towns of Clifton Forge, Iron Gate, Fincastle, Troutville, Buchanan, New % activity Castle and Vinton. Stretching from the Blue Ridge Mountains household across the Shenandoah Valley to the ridge and valley section of the Appalachian Mountains, the region is a mixture of urban Driving for pleasure 73 centers and rural farms and forests. Marked by topographic variety, Visiting natural areas 71 numerous rivers, streams, and many notable cultural and historic sites, the area offers a range of historic and outdoor experiences. Walking for pleasure 67 Whether hiking the Appalachian Trail or driving the Blue Ridge Parkway, exploring the George Washington and Jefferson National Visiting parks (local, state & national) 49 Forests or paddling the James River, the outdoor enthusiast’s choices of activities are many. Sunbathing/relaxing on a beach 48 Outdoor festivals (music festivals, Regional Focus outdoor-themed festivals, extreme sports 47 festivals, etc.) Table 5.1 Most-Needed Outdoor Recreation Opportunities Swimming/outdoor pool 46 Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Recreational Planning Region Viewing the water 36 % of households in Swimming/beach/lake river (open water) 35 activity region state Music festivals 34 Natural areas 58 54 Source: 2017 Virginia Outdoors Demand Survey.
    [Show full text]