R16 Francis Bright
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Black Pilots, Patriots, and Pirates: African-American Participation in the Virginia State and British Navies During the Revolutionary War in Virginia
W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2000 Black Pilots, Patriots, and Pirates: African-American Participation in the Virginia State and British Navies during the Revolutionary War in Virginia Kolby Bilal College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the African History Commons, European History Commons, Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Bilal, Kolby, "Black Pilots, Patriots, and Pirates: African-American Participation in the Virginia State and British Navies during the Revolutionary War in Virginia" (2000). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539626268. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-4hv4-ds79 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BLACK PILOTS, PATRIOTS, AND PIRATES African-American Participation in the Virginia State and British Navies During the Revolutionary War in Virginia A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Kolby Bilal 2000 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts by Bilal Approved, April 2000 James Axtell John Sel f U J Ronald Schecter For Michael and all of the other African American navy veterans who preceded him honor, courage, and dignity TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v ABSTRACT vi INTRODUCTION 2 CHAPTER I 11 CHAPTER II 29 CONCLUSION 39 BIBLIOGRAPHY 43 VITA 47 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express my appreciation to Professor James Axtell, under whose guidance this thesis was prepared, for his attempts to make me a better writer. -
The Naval War of 1812, Volume 1, Index
The Naval War of 1812: A Documentary History Volume I 1812 Part 7 of 7 Naval Historical Center Department of the Navy Washington, 1985 Electronically published by American Naval Records Society Bolton Landing, New York 2011 AS A WORK OF THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THIS PUBLICATION IS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. NOTE ON THE INDEX Index Certain aspects of the treatment of persons and vessels in this index supple ment annotation in the volume. Abbott, - -(Capt.). 255, 256 (Rebecca) 649·51; mentioned, 24. 25, 214. 216n, 497 , PERSONS; The Tank of military personnel is the highest rank attained by the in A~rdour , James (Comdr., RN). 182 (Muros) 646,651. 5ee also Croker. John W. dividual between the declaration of war, 18 June 1812, and 31 December Acasta , HM frigate: capcuta: Curlew. 216. Admiralty Courts. British: Essu case, I, 16-2 1 1812. When all references to an individual lie outside that span, the rank is 225; at La Cuaira, 64; on Nonh Amuican High Court of Admiralty: ruling in Essu the highest applicable to the person at the times to which the text refers. Station. 495; of( Nantucket. 505: chases case, 16, 17.20·21: mentioned, 25. 66. 67 Civilian masters of vessels are identified simply as "Capt." Vessels that Essu, mentioned. 485, 487 , 497 (Alexander - Lorch Commissionen of Appeals. 20·21 R. Kerr) civilians and naval personnel commanded during the period 18 June to ~H Vice Admiralty Courts: at Nassau. 17 -20: Actiw. American privat~r .schooner, 225 December 1812 are noted in parentheses at the end of the man's entry. -
The Revolutionary War Battle of Petersburg, Virginia
April 2003 lecture by Robert P. Davis to the Sons of the American Revolution – Richmond Chapter. All rights reserved by Robert P. Davis; one time publication granted. The Revolutionary War Battle of Petersburg, Virginia Setting the Stage - The Revolutionary War Battle of Petersburg, Virginia occurred on April 25, 1781, shortly before the Battle of Yorktown and the end of the war. Until 1780, most all battles and campaigns of the revolution had occurred in the north and to the south of Virginia. Up to this time, Virginia remained almost totally ignored by the British as their conquest to subdue the American patriots was directed more to primary cities and ports. Neither could the King’s army bring the Americans to a set-piece battle. General Washington was biding his time to train his army and subsequently ally with the French, and then find some ground that would be ultimately advantageous to the American Army. In 1779, Sir Henry Clinton, the Commander in Chief of the British Army in America, moved a large army to the south, capturing Charleston, South Carolina. Upon his departure, he left Lord Charles Cornwallis in command of the British southern theater of the war. Following several battles with the remaining American army in the south, which culminated with the disastrous defeat of General Gates, Cornwallis was then confronted by a new American general in the person of Major General Nathanael Greene. Washington had sent Greene to the south to reconstitute the army after its defeat under Gates. While British forces occupied much of the north and the south, they controlled little while the American army remained elusive. -
A Field Guide Not to the Join NWTA Us?
Why A Field Guide not to the join NWTA us? Revolutionary War reenacting is a fun, exciting and educational hobby in which the entire family may participate. If you and your family are interested in joining an NWTA unit, talk to some people around camp, they will be more than happy to answer questions. Check out our website, www.nwta.com for more information about our organization, our units and our event schedule and locations. Or contact the Loyal Irish Volunteer Recruit- ing Coordinator or the Adjutant to find out more about joining our organization. Recruiting: [email protected] Membership: [email protected] A Field Guide to The NWTA © 2014 North West Territory Alliance The North West Territory Alliance No reproduction without prior written permission Contact the Adjutant Recreating the American Revolution [email protected] www.nwta.com 1775-1783 28 18th century warfare is thought by many to be a sluggish, slow-moving affair Welcome to The NWTA where armies moved in great masses and prevailed over each other with enor- mous casualties. In fact, the maneuvers and drills used by 18th century armies The North West Territory Alliance is a non-profit educational organization that were designed to operate at maximum speed of horses and men on the battlefield. studies and recreates the culture and arts of the time of the American Revolution, Maintaining orderly formations was important to allow the most effective use of 1775-1783. We strive to duplicate the uniforms, weapons, battlefield tactics, the main infantry weapons — the musket, bayonet and cannon — for maximum camp life and civilian life of the time as accurately as possible. -
The History, Discovery and Recovery of the USS Monitor
W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2012 Ironclad Revolution: The History, Discovery and Recovery of the USS Monitor Anna Gibson Holloway College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Holloway, Anna Gibson, "Ironclad Revolution: The History, Discovery and Recovery of the USS Monitor" (2012). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539623591. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-6ta9-r518 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ironclad Revolution: The History, Discovery and Recovery of the USS Monitor Anna Gibson Holloway Hayes, Virginia Master of Arts, The College of William and Mary, 1997 Bachelor of Arts, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 1990 Bachelor of Arts, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 1986 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the College of William and Mary in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History The College of William and Mary January 2012 Copyright 2012 Anna Gibson Holloway APPROVAL PAGE This Dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Approved by the Committee, De~ember 2011 ~of &.A Committee Chair Professor Carol Sheriff, History The College of William and Mary Professor Scott Nelson The C of William and Dr. -
The Battle of Hampton Roads
The Battle of Hampton Roads Hampton Roads was a peaceful waterway cross-roads prior to the start of the Civil War. The importance of the area, where the James, Nansemond and Elizabeth Rivers flow into the Chesapeake Bay, was instantly realized by both warring parties. The James River provided a direct water route between Richmond and the Chesapeake Bay. The large US naval base at Norfolk was abandoned by the Federals on April 20, 1861 and immediately taken over by the Confederates. This provided them with the potential to build an effective Navy if they could control the Hampton Roads outlet. Meanwhile, the United States knew that if they could control the area, they could lead a combined land and water attack on Rich- mond and put a quick end to the war. The Union vessels retained control of Chesapeake Bay and Hampton Roads until March 8, 1862, the day the Confederate ironclad Virginia, previously the USS frigate Merrimack, attacked the Federal fleet. In three hours the CSS Virginia destroyed two of the Union’s most powerful vessels and planned a return trip the following day to attack the USS Minnesota. To counter this, the newly-completed ironclad USS Monitor was hastily dispatched to Hamp- ton Roads during the night of March 8 arriving in position to protect the Min- nesota on March 9th at 2:00 AM. The CSS Virginia resumed the attack at map of Hampton Roads region 8:45 AM and after a four hour engagement, both ironclads withdrew. Both sides claimed victory. The USS Monitor had protected the Minnesota and the CSS Virginia won a strategic victory as it denied the Union naval use of Hampton Roads and the James River. -
Fairfax Historic Records Center Participants in American Revolution
Participants of Revolutionary War - Fairfax County Binder Last Name First Name Residence at Enlistment Company at Enlistment Rank Source Page # Notes Capt. Fitzjarel, 3rd Regiment of Col. Weden & Abbey Edward Fairfax County, VA Lt. Col. Marshall Soldier Dorman, Vol. 1 1 Capt. Philip Alexander's Ramsay Family Papers Adam Robert Fairfax County, VA Company Soldier Family Papers 2 Capt. Philip Alexander's Adams James Fairfax County, VA Company Soldier Ramsay Family Papers 2 referred to as "old Revolutionary War Adams John UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN Alexandria Gazette 2 soldier" Adams William, Jr. Fairfax County, VA Captain Moody's Company Soldier Ramsay Family Papers 2 Died in Revolutionary War; Virginia Continental Line, name on War Alexander George Dent Fairfax County, VA Grayson's Regiment Surgeon Burgess, Vol. 1/Brown 3 Memorial Virginia Captain of own militia Gazette/Ramsay Family Alexander Gerrard Fairfax County, VA company Captain Papers 6 Captain of own militia Alexander John Fairfax County, VA company Captain Ramsay Family Papers 6 Captain of own militia Alexander Philip Fairfax County, VA company Captain Ramsay Family Papers 6 Alexander Robert Fairfax County, VA Capt. Gerrard Alexander Soldier Ramsay Family Papers 6 Col. George Gibson's Allison John Fairfax County, VA regiment Lt. Colonel Dorman, Vol. 1 7 defended the Col. Weeden Regiment, Potomac from the Almy John Rhode Island Capt. West's Company Mariner/Rifleman Dorman, Vol. 1 9 British Capt. Oliver Towles' Alsop Benjamin Spotsylvania Co., VA Company Sgt./Lt. Dorman, Vol. 2 12 Capt Sanford's Company; Alverson Elijah Fairfax County, VA Capt. George Reardon Soldier Dorman, Vol. 2 15 3rd VA Continent Regiment, Col. -
VAS1949 James Barron
Southern Campaign American Revolution Pension Statements and Rosters Virginia documents pertaining to James Barron VAS1949 Transcribed and annotated by C. Leon Harris. [From Library of Virginia Legislative Petitions Digital Collection/ Elizabeth City County] To the Honorable the Speakers & Members of the General Assembly, the petition of Samuel & James Baron [sic: Samuel Barron, pension application R6 and James Barron W12264] Heirs and Representatives of Commadore [blank; see endnote] deceased Humbly sheweth That your petitioner’s Father during the American Contest took an active and decided part in favor of his Country and at a very early period of the War was appointed to the command of the State Boat the Liberty equipped by the public to guard the Shores and Islands of the Chesapeake from the Ravages and plunder of the British Barges. – That our petitioners Father continued in the actual Command of this Vessel untill the establishment of a State Navy, the command of which, then, by reason of services and seniority, devolv’d upon him – that he discharged the duties of this, his Command, with diligence and fidelity, untill the derangement of the said Navy; after which, he was retained in his original command of the Liberty, to which it was thought necessary to add, one other Vessel – namely the Boat Patriot, in order to guard against such predatory descents as above mentioned. That your petitioners Father was not only among the first who step’d forward in the cause of his Country, but was constantly engaged in her service from the commencement of Hostilities, untill long after the Ratification of her Independence by the treaty of Paris. -
Palmetto Navy: Ironclad Construction and the Naval Defense of Charleston During the Civil War
Palmetto Navy: Ironclad Construction and the Naval Defense of Charleston During the Civil War by Charles Wexler A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama May 09, 2015 Keywords: history, civil war, Charleston, navy, industry, ironclads Copyright 2015 by Charles Wexler Approved by Kenneth Noe, Chair, Professor of History Angela Lakwete, Associate Professor of History Mark Sheftall, Associate Professor of History Randall Holmes, Professor of Mathematics and Statistics Abstract This dissertation traces the creation and operation of the Charleston Naval Squadron in the Civil War through a look at the different ships and construction strategies implemented within Charleston Harbor. Under the direction of Stephen Mallory, the Confederate Navy pursued armored warships to defend local ports. Charleston shipyards completed four ironclads and started two others. The Confederate Navy did not enjoy a monopoly on maritime procurement, however. Navy shipwrights, army engineers, South Carolina government officials, the Charleston Daily Courier, independent contractors, and private citizens all participated in the shipbuilding process. These different entities promoted differing designs and concepts that included shot-proof steamers, lightly armored torpedo boats, and the submersible Hunley. Confederate naval construction in Charleston ultimately suffered from two critical problems: a congested procurement pipeline and an increasing resource scarcity, particularly of iron plate. The return of Gen. Pierre G. T. Beauregard in September 1862 contributed towards both problems when he championed an army-designed torpedo boat at the expense of additional ironclads. Regardless of what local shipwrights produced the sailors of the Charleston Squadron provided the best hope for success against the South Atlantic Blockading Squadron. -
The Emergence of Loyalist Privateering During the American Revolution, 1775-1778 Volume I
The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library 2002 "Averse…to Remaining Idle Spectators:" the Emergence of Loyalist Privateering During the American Revolution, 1775-1778 Volume I. Introduction to Chapter 8 Richard D. Pougher Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Pougher, Richard D., ""Averse…to Remaining Idle Spectators:" the Emergence of Loyalist Privateering During the American Revolution, 1775-1778 Volume I. Introduction to Chapter 8" (2002). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 207. http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/207 This Open-Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. "AVERSE ...TO REMAINING IDLE SPECTATORS:" THE EMERGENCE OF LOYALIST PRIVATEERING DURING THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1775-1778 VOLUME I. INTRODUCTION TO CHAPTER 8 BY Richard D. Pougher B.A. Carthage College, 1974 M.A. Southern Methodist University, 1981 M.A. The College of William and Mary, 1988 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (in History) The Graduate School The University of Maine May, 2002 Advisory Committee: Jerome Nadelhaft, Professor Emeritus of History, Advisor Warren Riess, Research Assistant Professor of History Marli Weiner, Professor of History Liam Riordan, Assistant Professor of History David Switzer, Professor of History and State Nautical Archaeologist, New Hampshire Copyright 1992, 2002, Richard D. Pougher "AVERSE ...TO REMAINING IDLE SPECTATORS:" THE EMERGENCE OF LOYALIST PRIVATEERING DURING THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 1775-1778 By Richard D. -
Marines in Gray: the Birth, Life and Death of the Confederate States Marine Corps
MARINES IN GRAY: THE BIRTH, LIFE AND DEATH OF THE CONFEDERATE STATES MARINE CORPS A Thesis by MICHAEL E. KRIVDO Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2006 Major Subject: History MARINES IN GRAY: THE BIRTH, LIFE AND DEATH OF THE CONFEDERATE STATES MARINE CORPS A Thesis by MICHAEL E. KRIVDO Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, Joseph G. Dawson, III Committee Members, Roger R. Reese Cemal Pulak Head of Department, Walter R. Buenger December 2006 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT Marines in Gray: The Birth, Life and Death of the Confederate States Marine Corps. (December 2006) Michael E. Krivdo, B.A., Texas A&M University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Joseph G. Dawson, III This thesis explores and provides analysis on several areas of study related to the history of the Confederate States Marine Corps that have long been neglected. It examines the military and political processes that were instrumental in both creating and employing a Southern Marine Corps. It also investigates relationships between the U.S. and Confederate Marine Corps, particularly in light of how the experiences of former U.S. Marines shaped the growth of the Southern Corps. In particular, the thesis asserts that, despite shared origins, the CSMC seized on opportunities presented by the Civil War and became expert in new mission areas through the efforts of a core group of determined and experienced leaders. -
Located in the Elizabeth River Ferry Docking Facility City .Of Portsmouth
Archaeologicdl Documentation of the Remains ofa Late Eighteenth- or Eddy Nineteenth-Centu y Kissel Located in the Elizabeth River Ferry Docking Facility City .of Portsmouth, Virginia A Technical Report Series No. 6 2006 Virginia Department of Historic Resources 280 1 Kensington Avenue Richmond, VA 23221 Archaeological Documentation of the Remains of a Late Eighteenth- or Early Nineteenth- Centuy Vessel Located in the Elizabeth River Ferry Docking Facility, City of Portsmouth, Virginia Technical Report Series No. 6 Virginia Department of Historic Resources Tidewater Regional Preservation Office 1441 5 Old Courthouse Way, 2nd Floor Newport News, VA 23608 PREPAREDFOR: Hampton Roads Transit P.O. Box 2096 Norfolk, VA 2350 1 PREPAREDRX Tidewater Atlantic Research, Inc. P. 0. Box 2494 Washington, North Carolina 27889 PROJECTD~RE~TOR: Gordon P. Watts, Jr. AUT~RS: Gordon Watts Roderick Mather Raymond Tubby During the excavation of a ferry docking facility on the Southern Branch of the Elizabeth River in downtown Portsmouth, Virginia, the remains of a wooden vessel were discovered. Construction crews uncovered two sections of the vessel approximately 20-25 ft. below the gound surface. As construction of the ferry facility necessitated removal of the wreck, Ham- p ton Roads Transit contracted with Tidewater Atlantic Research, I nc. (TAR), of Washington, North Carolina, to develop a measured ~lanof the surviving vessel remains prior to their removal and document each significant element of the structure after removal. The archaeo- logical documentation carried out by TAR was designed to meet the provisions of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended through 1992 (36 CFR 800, Protection of Historic Proper+ties) and the Abandoned Shipwreck Act of 1987 (Abandoned Ship- wreck Act Guidelines, National Park Service, Federal Register, Vol.