DOCSLIB.ORG

TECHNICAL FINAL REPORT (Reporting Period: 16 February 2015 to 28 February, 2016)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TECHNICAL FINAL REPORT (Reporting Period: 16 February 2015 to 28 February, 2016) Forest and Farm Facility (FFF) TECHNICAL FINAL REPORT (Reporting Period: 16 February 2015 to 28 February, 2016) Name of the Implementing Organization: Myanmar Environment Rehabilitation-conservation Network (MERN) I. Title of the project: Establishment of Regional level Community Forest Products Producer Association in Rakhine, Supporting MERN Membership Process for Forest and Farm Producer Groups and Developing an Effective Communication and Engagement Strategy II. Description of the site where the project was implemented: The project was implemented in Southern Rakhine State, specifically based in Gwa township and Kyeintali sub-township where MERN implemented a project from 2011 to 2014. Gwa and Kyeintali are situated in Rakhine State of Myanmar (see annex-1). The project area is one of the less developing regions in Rakhine State which is also less developed compare to other states and divisions in Myanmar. Food security and livelihood conditions are, although, not the worst due to not too much dense population but it is still far from satisfactory level. Coastal mangrove forests which are nesting place for fish, prawn, etc., wood and energy source for local people and also contributing for Disaster Risk Reduction are degrading at alarming rate in southern part of Rakhine. Gwa Township covers the total area of 885.11 sq.miles in which Kyein-ta-li Sub-township contributes 300.08 sq. miles. Over 75% of the area in Gwa Township is covered with forest, total extent of 434,592 acres, including mangrove area. According to the forest management classification by Forest Department there is, although, no Reserved Forest in Gwa, two Protected Public Forests are existed and the others are Public Forest. Forest areas in Kyein-ta-li are also Public Forest with the total extent of approximately 349,015 acres in which about 15,000 acres of mangrove area is included. Under the Coastal Livelihood and Environmental Assets Restoration in Rakhine-CLEARR project which was implemented by MERN, 42 small holder producer groups, mainly CFUGs (Community Forest User Groups), have been successfully established. Therefore, it is in need of establishing a regional level sectoral-platform to be able to join community level to national level, specifically to CFNWG. III. Participants / Beneficiaries: This project will cover over 42 Community Forest User Groups in consist of about 1200 members IV. Objectives of the Letter of Agreement (LoA) The objective of this LoA is to establishing a state level producer association from existing community forestry user groups to engage in a national level cross-sectoral platform, while simultaneously strengthening MERN’s membership and communication strategy The expected outcomes of this LoA are:- 1. Strengthened human resources capacity of MERN and MERN membership process for forest and farm producer groups is operational 2. Communication strategy for existing and new members, including for the engagement and development of forest and farm producers groups, is established 3. Existing Community Forest User Groups (CFUGs) in Kyeintali and Gwa in Southern Rakhine region are strengthened for business development planning 4. Regional level Community Forest Products Producer Association (CFPPA) is well functioning in Rakhine region Technical Final Report by MERN (16 Feb 2015 -28 Feb, 2016) Page 1 V. Brief Description of project implementation (as per proposed activities) 1.1. Support to existing Service Provider staff members and recruitment of one year program staff responsible for communication and membership development, under the overall leadership of the MERN CEO Aung Thant Zin (ATZ), the CEO of MERN is taking the responsibility of FFF-Myanmar Facilitator for the FFF Myanmar Program since its’ starting days. Under his supervision, the Program Manager of MERN also assisted in FFF Program activities, especially in market-led activities. Furthermore, a Program Officer was recruited for communication and member coordination under FFF support. The organization chart of MERN is given in Annex 1. In the beginning of network formatin, MERN composed of 17 local environmental NGOs. In 2015, It reached up 21 members and brief information is given in Annex 2. Now, Five local NGOs applied for membership: Myanmar Forest Association (MFA), Chin State-based Myanmar Enhancement to Empower Tribal (MEET), Ayeyarwady Delta-based Nature and Environmental Rehabilitation Network (NERN), Community Development Action (CDA), and Karuna Mission Social Solidarity (KMSS), a Karen organization. At least two other NGOs, from Karen State, China State, and Sagaing Division, have expressed interest in joining, reflecting a move to diversify MERN’s membership away from Yangon. According to the MERN Charter, CBO-Community Based Organizations can be a member of Observer status or Associate member status. The Central Executive Committee of MERN sees the Community Forest Products Producer Association as CBO so that they can be a Observer or Associate members of MERN if they applied. Due to focusig on formation of township and regional level CFPPAs, they haven’t apply yet to MERN for membership. Under the leadership of CEO-MERN, the Program Manager and Program Officer (Communication and Network Coordination) worked for FFF program implementation, coordination & collaboration with government, specifically with the Forest Department and Implementing Partners (ECCDI, SDF, SVS, MHDO, MCS, AYO, FREDA, etc.). They also participated in FFF Retreat/Annual Program Planning Meeting, Regional Training on Market Analysis & Development and the exchange visits. MERN team coordinated for FFF mid-term evaluation. During this project period, MERN team organized 2 trainings, 1 follow up training and 1 national exchange. CEO prepared and sent the Facilitator’s monthly reports and contributed in reports of trainings and national exchange with the assistance of Program Manager and Program Officer. CEO involved in FFF Country Coach’s Mission including meeting with the Director-General and senior officials of the Forest Department. 1.2 Drawing up a FFF program work plan, coordination of existing FFF projects and meetings in Myanmar Before the FFF 2015-Retreat, CEO, Program Manager and Program Officer (Communication and Network Coordination) discussed and prepared the draft Workplan-2016. On behalf of Aung Thant Zin (ATZ), CEO-MERN and FFF-Myanmar Facilitator, Ms. Khin Nyein Nyein Mon, Program Officer (Communication and Network Coordination) attended at the FFF 2015-Retreat and she presented the work plan 2016 for Myanmar. According to the comments given on her presentation and with the support of Mr. Jhony Zapate, Country Coach for Myanmar, the draft work plan-2016 was further updated with the inputs of CEO-MERN and Program Manager. Then, the work plan was finalized with the FFF implementing partners in January 2016 in Yangon, Myanmar. The final work plan finalized with the FFF-IPs are given in the Annex 3. Technical Final Report by MERN (16 Feb 2015 -28 Feb, 2016) Page 2 1.3 Field visits to emerging forest and farm producer organizations at township level in at least three states Three field visits were made to Southern Shan State in November 2015, to Ayeyarwady Delta in December 2015 and to Southern Rakhine in January 2016. The first visit was made to the Southern Shan State by leaving on 6 November, 2016 from Yangon. On 7 November, the FFF MERN team, comprising of FFF-Myanmar Facilitator, Program Manager and Program Assistant from MERN met with FFF-ECCDI Assistant Project In-Charge and the committee members of CFPPAs in Aungban. The progress of the project was discussed and holding the event of Southern Shan State level CFPPA formation was also discussed to be happened in December 2015. Then, the team visited to FFF-MCS project villages on 8 December and monitored the development of producer groups formed under FFF-MCS project. The trip was ended by going back to Yangon on 9 December, 2016. The second visit to Ayeyarwady Delta was done on 30 December 2016. The team comprised of 4 members; CEO-MERN & FFF Facilitator ATZ, Program Officer, Program Assistant and an Intern person. At first, the team visited to field office of Network Activity Group in Pya Pon Town and discussed about progress of a small grant project implemented by MERN & IUCN funded by EU. Then, the team proceed to Bogalay. The team met with FFF-SVS project in-charge and CFPPA members from project villages in Bogalay. Formation of sub-township level East Meinmahla CFPPA was discussed to be happened in first quarter of 2017 and business development and linkages for the CFPPAs were also discussed. The last trip to Gwa and Kyeintali in Southern Rakhine was undertaken from 15 to 18 January, 2016. The team comprised of 3 members; CEO-MERN & FFF Facilitator ATZ, Program Officer, Program Assistant. The team met with FFF-RCA-ECCDI project in-charge and CFPPA members in Kyeintali sub-township on 16 January and visited to two CFPPA villages. The team also met with CFPPA members in Gwa Township on 17 January and discussed to form Southern Rakhine CFPPA. Progress and other issues were also discussed. From three field visits it could support the CFPPAs for the approaches for business development and encourage them to be happened the formation of regional CFPPAs. 2.1 Setting up a communication strategy together with forest and farm producer organizations, as part of a broader the Service Provider’s communication strategy The communication strategy was drafted by the FFF-Myanmar Facilitator with the support of Program Officer
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rakhine State
    Myanmar Information Management Unit Township Map - Rakhine State 92° E 93° E 94° E Tilin 95° E Township Myaing Yesagyo Pauk Township Township Bhutan Bangladesh Kyaukhtu !( Matupi Mindat Mindat Township India China Township Pakokku Paletwa Bangladesh Pakokku Taungtha Samee Ü Township Township !( Pauk Township Vietnam Taungpyoletwea Kanpetlet Nyaung-U !( Paletwa Saw Township Saw Township Ngathayouk !( Bagan Laos Maungdaw !( Buthidaung Seikphyu Township CHIN Township Township Nyaung-U Township Kanpetlet 21° N 21° Township MANDALAYThailand N 21° Kyauktaw Seikphyu Chauk Township Buthidaung Kyauktaw KyaukpadaungCambodia Maungdaw Chauk Township Kyaukpadaung Salin Township Mrauk-U Township Township Mrauk-U Salin Rathedaung Ponnagyun Township Township Minbya Rathedaung Sidoktaya Township Township Yenangyaung Yenangyaung Sidoktaya Township Minbya Pwintbyu Pwintbyu Ponnagyun Township Pauktaw MAGWAY Township Saku Sittwe !( Pauktaw Township Minbu Sittwe Magway Magway .! .! Township Ngape Myebon Myebon Township Minbu Township 20° N 20° Minhla N 20° Ngape Township Ann Township Ann Minhla RAKHINE Township Sinbaungwe Township Kyaukpyu Mindon Township Thayet Township Kyaukpyu Ma-Ei Mindon Township !( Bay of Bengal Ramree Kamma Township Kamma Ramree Toungup Township Township 19° N 19° N 19° Munaung Toungup Munaung Township BAGO Padaung Township Thandwe Thandwe Township Kyangin Township Myanaung Township Kyeintali !( 18° N 18° N 18° Legend ^(!_ Capital Ingapu .! State Capital Township Main Town Map ID : MIMU1264v02 Gwa !( Other Town Completion Date : 2 November 2016.A1 Township Projection/Datum : Geographic/WGS84 Major Road Data Sources :MIMU Base Map : MIMU Lemyethna Secondary Road Gwa Township Boundaries : MIMU/WFP Railroad Place Name : Ministry of Home Affairs (GAD) translated by MIMU AYEYARWADY Coast Map produced by the MIMU - [email protected] Township Boundary www.themimu.info Copyright © Myanmar Information Management Unit Yegyi Ngathaingchaung !( State/Region Boundary 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Rakhine State Census Report Volume 3 – K
    THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNION OF MYANMAR The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census Rakhine State Census Report Volume 3 – K Department of Population Ministry of Immigration and Population May 2015 The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census Rakhine State Report Census Report Volume 3 – K For more information contact: Department of Population Ministry of Immigration and Population Office No. 48 Nay Pyi Taw Tel: +95 67 431 062 www.dop.gov.mm May, 2015 Foreword The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census (2014 MPHC) was conducted from 29th March to 10th April 2014 on a de facto basis. The successful planning and implementation of the census activities, followed by the timely release of the provisional results in August 2014, and now the main results in May 2015, is a clear testimony of the Government’s resolve to publish all information collected from respondents in accordance with the Population and Housing Census Law No. 19 of 2013. It is now my hope that the main results, both Union and each of the State and Region reports, will be interpreted correctly and will effectively inform the planning and decision-making processes in our quest for national and sub-national development. The census structures put in place, including the Central Census Commission, Census Committees and officers at the State/Region, District and Township Levels, and the International Technical Advisory Board (ITAB), a group of 15 experts from different countries and institutions involved in censuses and statistics internationally, provided the requisite administrative and technical inputs for the implementation of the census. The technical support and our strong desire to follow international standards affirmed our commitment to strict adherence to the guidelines and recommendations, which form part of international best practices for census taking.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of Parliament-Elect, Myanmar/Burma
    To: Hon. Mr. Ban Ki-moon Secretary-General United Nations From: Members of Parliament-Elect, Myanmar/Burma CC: Mr. B. Lynn Pascoe, Under-Secretary-General, United Nations Mr. Ibrahim Gambari, Under-Secretary-General and Special Adviser to the Secretary- General on Myanmar/Burma Permanent Representatives to the United Nations of the five Permanent Members (China, Russia, France, United Kingdom and the United states) of the UN Security Council U Aung Shwe, Chairman, National League for Democracy Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, General Secretary, National League for Democracy U Aye Thar Aung, Secretary, Committee Representing the Peoples' Parliament (CRPP) Veteran Politicians The 88 Generation Students Date: 1 August 2007 Re: National Reconciliation and Democratization in Myanmar/Burma Dear Excellency, We note that you have issued a statement on 18 July 2007, in which you urged the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC) (the ruling military government of Myanmar/Burma) to "seize this opportunity to ensure that this and subsequent steps in Myanmar's political roadmap are as inclusive, participatory and transparent as possible, with a view to allowing all the relevant parties to Myanmar's national reconciliation process to fully contribute to defining their country's future."1 We thank you for your strong and personal involvement in Myanmar/Burma and we expect that your good offices mandate to facilitating national reconciliation in Myanmar/Burma would be successful. We, Members of Parliament elected by the people of Myanmar/Burma in the 1990 general elections, also would like to assure you that we will fully cooperate with your good offices and the United Nations in our effort to solve problems in Myanmar/Burma peacefully through a meaningful, inclusive and transparent dialogue.
    [Show full text]
  • National Report of Myanmar
    1 NATIONAL REPORT OF MYANMAR On the Sustainable Management of The Bay of Bengal Large Marine Ecosystem (BOBLME) GCP/RAS/179/WBG Department of Fisheries Fishing Grounds of Myanmar and Landing Sites 92 30’ 93 30’ 94 30’ 95 30’ 96 30’ 97 30’ 98 30’ 99 a 1 SITTWAY T O EN F F A1 A2 M IS T H R 20 E 20 A R P I E E A3 A4 b A5 A6 S D 30’ 30’ c A10 A7 A8 A9 19 19 d A14 THANDWE A11 A12 A13 A15 30’ HANDWETHANDWE 30’ e A16 A17 A18 A19 A20 A 18 2 18 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 GWA 30’ f 30’ B6 B7 B8 B9 B10 17 g 17 YANGON B11 B12 B13 B14 B15 PATHEIN 30’ h 30’ i B20 B16 B17 B18 B19 D2 D3 B j D1 3 16 16 4 C3 C1 C2 k C4 C5 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8 30’ BAS 30’ E L I NE YE C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 D9 D10 D11 D12 D13 TER RITO 15 15 RIA L LI NE YE C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 D14 D15 D16 D17 D18 30’ 30’ l C16 C17 C18 C19 C20 D19 D20 D21 D22 D23 DAWEI 14 C m 14 5 C21 C22 C23 C24 8 9 6 C25 D24 D25 D26 D27 D28 D D 29 30’ 7 10 30’ E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 13 13 11 E8 E9 E10 n E11 E12 E7 30’ 30’ o MYEIK 12 MYEIK E13 E14 E15 E16 E17 E18 12 p 12 q 13 E20 E21 E22 E23 E24 E25 E 30’ 14 30’ F F2 F5 F7 1 F3 F4 F6 11 11 15 F F9 F10 F11 F12 F13 F14 r 30’ 8 30’ s 16 F 15 17 F16 F17 F18 F19 F20 F21 F 10 18 10 t KAWTHOUNG u v 92 30’ 93 30’ 94 30’ 95 30’ 96 30’ 97 30’ 98 30’ 99 Prepared by Myint Pe (National Consultant) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • “Pre-Election Monitoring Study in Rakhine State”
    “Pre-Election Monitoring Study in Rakhine State” Table of Contents KEY FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................................... 2 1. BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 5 1.1. POLITICAL PARTY LANDSCAPE IN RAKHINE STATE............................................................................ 7 1.2. INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ON FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS .............................................................. 8 1.3. ELECTORAL SYSTEM IN MYANMAR ................................................................................................. 10 2. OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY ..................................................................................... 11 1. METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................ 11 1.1. SAMPLING ...................................................................................................................................... 11 1.2. RESEARCH PROCESS ........................................................................................................................ 12 1.3. LIMITATION OF STUDY .................................................................................................................... 12 2. FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mangrove Coverage Evolution in Rakhine State 1988-2015
    For Humanitarian Purposes Only MYANMAR - Rakhine State Production date : 21st October 2015 Mangrove Coverage Evolution in Rakhine State 1988-2015 This map illustrates the evolution of mangrove extent in Rakhine State, Myanmar as derived Bhutan from Landsat-5 multispectral imagery acquired between 13 January and 23 February for Nepal Mindat 1988 and 30 January and 24 February for 2015 at 30m of pixel resolution. India China Town Bangladesh Bangladesh This is a preliminary analysis and has not yet been validated in the field. Paletwa Town Viet Nam Myanmar 0 10 20 30 Kms Laos Taungpyoletwea Kanpetlet Town Town Maungdaw Thailand Buthidaung Kyauktaw Cambodia Taungpyoletwea Maungdaw Kyauktaw Buthidaung Town Buthidaung Kyauktaw Maungdaw Kyauktaw Buthidaung Mrauk-U Town Maungdaw Rathedaung Mrauk-U Ponnagyun Town Minbya Rathedaung Ponnagyun Pauktaw Minbya Sittwe Pauktaw Myebon Sittwe Myebon Ann Ann Mrauk-U Kyaukpyu Ma-Ei Kyaukpyu Ramree Ramree Toungup Rathedaung Mrauk-U Munaung Munaung Toungup Town Ann Thandwe Ponnagyun Thandwe Rathedaung Minbya Kyeintali Mindon Ma-Ei Town Town Town Gwa Gwa Ramree Minbya Town Ponnagyun Town Pauktaw Sittwe Pauktaw Town Sittwe Toungup Town Myebon Town Myebon Ann Toungup Town Total Mangrove Coverage for the Township in 1988 and 2015 (ha) Ann Town Thandwe Town 280986 Thandwe 223506 Kyaukpyu 1988 2015 Town Mangrove Loss between 57480 ha 1988 and 2015 Kyaukpyu New Mangrove area Kyeintali Town Remaining area 1988-2015 Ramree Decrease between 1988 and 2015 Town Ramree State Boundary Township Boundary Village-Tract Village Data sources: Toungup Landcover Analysis: UNOSAT Administrative Boundaries, Settlements: OCHA Munaung Gwa Town Roads: OSM Coordinate System: WGS 1984 UTM Zone 46N Contact: [email protected] File: REACH_MMR_Map_Rakhine_HVA_Mangrove_21OCT2015_A1 Munaung Note: Data, designations and boundaries contained Gwa Town on this map are not warranted to be error-free and do not imply acceptance by the REACH partners, associated, donors mentioned on this map.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Danio Aesculapii, a New Species of Danio
    Zootaxa 2164: 41–48 (2009) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2009 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Danio aesculapii, a new species of danio from south-western Myanmar (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) SVEN O. KULLANDER & FANG FANG Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, PO Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract Danio aesculapii, new species, is described from small rivers on the western slope of the Rakhine Yoma in south-western Myanmar. It is superficially similar to D. choprae from northern Myanmar in having a series of vertical bars anteriorly on the side, but differs from it and other species of Danio in having six instead of seven or more branched dorsal-fin rays, and from all other species of Danio except D. erythromicron and D. kerri in having 12 instead of 10 or 14 circumpeduncular scale rows. Key words: Rakhine Yoma, Thandwe, Danio choprae, endemism Introduction The cyprinid fish genus Danio Hamilton includes 14 small species in South and Southeast Asia (Kullander et al. 2009), as a rule diagnosable by distinct species-specific colour patterns. About half of the species of Danio have a pigment pattern that consists of one or more dark or light horizontal stripes (Fang, 1998). Among the others, Danio kyathit Fang differs in having the stripes broken up into rows of small brown spots, D. margaritatus (Roberts) has a pattern of small light spots on the sides, D. dangila (Hamilton) has rows of dark rings with light centres, and D.
    [Show full text]
  • Rakhine State, Myanmar
    World Food Programme S P E C I A L R E P O R T THE 2018 FAO/WFP AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SECURITY MISSION TO RAKHINE STATE, MYANMAR 12 July 2019 Photographs: ©FAO/F. Del Re/L. Castaldi and ©WFP/K. Swe. This report has been prepared by Monika Tothova and Luigi Castaldi (FAO) and Yvonne Forsen, Marco Principi and Sasha Guyetsky (WFP) under the responsibility of the FAO and WFP secretariats with information from official and other sources. Since conditions may change rapidly, please contact the undersigned for further information if required. Mario Zappacosta Siemon Hollema Senior Economist, EST-GIEWS Senior Programme Policy Officer Trade and Markets Division, FAO Regional Bureau for Asia and the Pacific, WFP E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Please note that this Special Report is also available on the Internet as part of the FAO World Wide Web www.fao.org Please note that this Special Report is also available on the Internet as part of the FAO World Wide Web www.fao.org at the following URL address: http://www.fao.org/giews/ The Global Information and Early Warning System on Food and Agriculture (GIEWS) has set up a mailing list to disseminate its reports. To subscribe, submit the Registration Form on the following link: http://newsletters.fao.org/k/Fao/trade_and_markets_english_giews_world S P E C I A L R E P O R T THE 2018 FAO/WFP AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SECURITY MISSION TO RAKHINE STATE, MYANMAR 12 July 2019 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME Rome, 2019 Required citation: FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 3 Public Map of Rakhine State
    ICC-01/19-7-Anx3 04-07-2019 1/2 RH PT Annex 3 Public Map of Rakhine State (Source: Myanmar Information Management Unit) http://themimu.info/sites/themimu.info/files/documents/State_Map_D istrict_Rakhine_MIMU764v04_23Oct2017_A4.pdf ICC-01/19-7-Anx3 04-07-2019 2/2 RH PT Myanmar Information Management Unit District Map - Rakhine State 92° EBANGLADESH 93° E 94° E 95° E Pauk !( Kyaukhtu INDIA Mindat Pakokku Paletwa CHINA Maungdaw !( Samee Ü Taungpyoletwea Nyaung-U !( Kanpetlet Ngathayouk CHIN STATE Saw Bagan !( Buthidaung !( Maungdaw District 21° N THAILAND 21° N SeikphyuChauk Buthidaung Kyauktaw Kyauktaw Kyaukpadaung Maungdaw Mrauk-U Salin Rathedaung Mrauk-U Minbya Rathedaung Ponnagyun Mrauk-U District Sidoktaya Yenangyaung Minbya Pwintbyu Sittwe DistrictPonnagyun Pauktaw Sittwe Saku !( Minbu Pauktaw .! Ngape .! Sittwe Myebon Ann Magway Myebon 20° N RAKHINE STATE Minhla 20° N Ann MAGWAY REGION Sinbaungwe Kyaukpyu District Kyaukpyu Ma-Ei Kyaukpyu !( Mindon Ramree Toungup Ramree Kamma 19° N 19° N Bay of Bengal Munaung Toungup Munaung Padaung Thandwe District BAGO REGION Thandwe Thandwe Kyangin Legend .! State/Region Capital Main Town !( Other Town Kyeintali !( 18° N Coast Line 18° N Map ID: MIMU764v04 Township Boundary Creation Date: 23 October 2017.A4 State/Region Boundary Projection/Datum: Geographic/WGS84 International Boundary Data Sources: MIMU Gwa Base Map: MIMU Road Boundaries: MIMU/WFP Kyaukpyu Place Name: Ministry of Home Affairs (GAD) Gwa translated by MIMU Maungdaw Mrauk-U Email: [email protected] Website: www.themimu.info Sittwe Ngathaingchaung Copyright © Myanmar Information Management Unit Kilometers !( Thandwe 2017. May be used free of charge with attribution. 0 15 30 60 Yegyi 92° E 93° E 94° E 95° E Disclaimer: The names shown and the boundaries used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations..
    [Show full text]
  • Where There Is Police, There Is Persecution Government Security
    Physicians for Where There is Police, Human Rights There is Persecution Government Security Forces and October 2016 Human Rights Abuses in Myanmar’s Northern Rakhine State An immigration officer inspects Rohingyas’ paperwork at a checkpoint in Rakhine State. About Physicians for Human Rights For 30 years, Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) has used science and medicine to document and call attention to mass atrocities and severe human rights violations. PHR is a global organization founded on the idea that health professionals, with their specialized skills, ethical duties, and credible voices, are uniquely positioned to stop human rights violations. PHR’s investigations and expertise are used to advocate for persecuted health workers and medical facilities under attack, prevent torture, document mass atrocities, and hold those who violate human rights accountable. Table of Contents Acknowledgements 2 Introduction This report was written by Claudia Rader edited and Widney Brown, Physicians for prepared the report for 4 Methodology Human Rights (PHR) program publication. director, and is based on field 6 Background research conducted from November PHR would like to acknowledge 2015 to May 2016 in Myanmar the Bangladesh-based research 8 Findings (Rakhine State and Yangon) and team who contributed to the Bangladesh. study, design, and data collection 20 Discussion and also reviewed and edited the The report benefited from review report. PHR would also like to 24 Conclusion and by PHR leadership and staff, thank other external reviewers Recommendations including DeDe Dunevant, director who wish to remain anonymous. of communications, Donna McKay, 27 Endnotes MS, executive director, Marianne PHR is deeply indebted to the Møllmann, LLM, MSc, senior Rohingya and Rakhine people researcher, and Claudia Rader, MS, who were willing to share their content and marketing manager.
    [Show full text]
  • Demographic Characteristic S and Road Network on the Spread of Coronavirus Pandemic in Rakhine State
    THE IMPACT OF DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS AND ROAD NETWORK ON THE SPREAD OF CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC IN RAKHINE STATE: USING GEOSPATIAL TECHNIQUES Mu Mu Than (1), Khin Mar Yee (2), Tin Tin Mya (3), Thida Win (4) 1 Sittway University, Rakhine State, Myanmar 2 Myeik University, Tanintharyi Region, Myanmar 3 Pathein University, Ayeyarwady Region, Myanmar 4 East Yangon University, Yangon Region, Myanmar [email protected] KEY WORDS: connectivity, demographic characteristics, confirmed cases, factor 1. INTRODUCTION analysis, interaction Rakhine State has 5 districts in which 17 ABSTRACT: Demographic characteristics townships and 3sub-townships are included. give communities information for the past, Percentage of urban population is 17%. It has present and future plan and services. more rural nature. Total number of population Demographic data and connectivity of road in Rakhine State is 3,188,807 (2014 Census). It has an area of 36,778.1 Km2. Population network impact how far people travel and 2 what they do. The spread of COVID-19 cases density is 86.7 per km . It faces the Bay of in the state deals with these data. Bengal on the west, Bangladesh in the northwest and the India in the north. In the In the 31st August 2020 COVID-19 east it is bordered by state and regions of the confirmed cases across the state had risen to country (Figure 1). Waterway is important to 350 cases. This is more than that of Yangon the transportation of people and goods in the Region. The researchers are interested in the middle and northern part of the states to reasons for that.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar
    A/HRC/39/64 Advance Edited Version Distr.: General 12 September 2018 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty-ninth session 10–28 September 2018 Agenda item 4 Human rights situations that require the Council’s attention Report of the independent international fact-finding mission on Myanmar* Summary The Human Rights Council established the independent international fact-finding mission on Myanmar in its resolution 34/22. In accordance with its mandate, the mission focused on the situation in Kachin, Rakhine and Shan States since 2011. It also examined the infringement of fundamental freedoms, including the rights to freedom of expression, assembly and peaceful association, and the question of hate speech. The mission established consistent patterns of serious human rights violations and abuses in Kachin, Rakhine and Shan States, in addition to serious violations of international humanitarian law. These are principally committed by the Myanmar security forces, particularly the military. Their operations are based on policies, tactics and conduct that consistently fail to respect international law, including by deliberately targeting civilians. Many violations amount to the gravest crimes under international law. In the light of the pervasive culture of impunity at the domestic level, the mission finds that the impetus for accountability must come from the international community. It makes concrete recommendations to that end, including that named senior generals of the Myanmar military should be investigated and prosecuted in an international criminal tribunal for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. * The present report was submitted after the deadline in order to reflect the most recent developments. A/HRC/39/64 Contents Page I.
    [Show full text]