DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2012.01441V2 [Quant-Ph] 10 Jun 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2012.01441V2 [Quant-Ph] 10 Jun 2021 A no-go theorem on the nature of the gravitational field beyond quantum theory Thomas D. Galleyx,1, ∗ Flaminia Giacominix,1, y and John H. Selbyx2, z 1Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, 31 Caroline St. N, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 2Y5, Canada 2ICTQT, University of Gda´nsk,Wita Stwosza 63, 80-308 Gda´nsk,Poland Recently, table-top experiments involving massive quantum systems have been proposed to test the interface of quantum theory and gravity. In particular, the crucial point of the de- bate is whether it is possible to conclude anything on the quantum nature of the gravitational field, provided that two quantum systems become entangled due to solely the gravitational interaction. Typically, this question has been addressed by assuming an underlying physical theory to describe the gravitational interaction, but no systematic approach to characterise the set of possible gravitational theories which are compatible with the observation of entan- glement has been proposed. Here, we introduce the framework of Generalised Probabilistic Theories (GPTs) to the study of the nature of the gravitational field. This framework has the advantage that it only relies on the set of operationally accessible states, transforma- tions, and measurements, without presupposing an underlying theory. Hence, it provides a framework to systematically study all theories compatible with the detection of entanglement generated via the gravitational interaction between two non-classical systems. Assuming that such entanglement is observed we prove a no-go theorem stating that the following state- ments are incompatible: i) the two non-classical systems are independent subsystems, ii) the gravitational field is a physical degree of freedom which mediates the interaction and iii) the gravitational field is classical. Moreover we argue that conditions i) and ii) should be met, and hence that the gravitational field is non-classical. Non-classicality does not imply that the gravitational field is quantum, and to illustrate this we provide examples of non-classical and non-quantum theories which are logically consistent with the other conditions. I. INTRODUCTION The fundamental description of spacetime and, in particular, the nature of the gravitational field are among the deepest puzzles that fundamental physics is facing nowadays. The twofold role of the gravitational field |as a dynamical quantity and as the metric of the spacetime| precludes us the use of standard quantisation techniques. In general, no agreement has been reached on whether gravity should admit a quantum description at all: some arguments deem it impossible to find a quantum description of the gravitational field [1, 2], others call for a radically new perspective on its quantisation [3], while the majority of results are in favour of its quantum description [4{9]. arXiv:2012.01441v2 [quant-ph] 10 Jun 2021 The lack of an explanation on the nature of the gravitational field is not a matter of abstract speculation, but poses important challenges for experiments which may soon be within the reach of technology. For instance, there are several open questions which challenge the conclusions which could be drawn from experiments at low-energies, in which massive bodies prepared in a quantum state interact solely via the gravitational field. The nature of the gravitational field associated to a quantum source has been first discussed by Feynman [10, 11]. Since then, many experiments involving massive bodies in superposition have been proposed [12{26]. Recently, the debate around these topics has been revived by two papers [27, 28], in which two masses A and B become entangled solely by the gravitational interaction, ∗ [email protected] y [email protected] z [email protected] x All authors contributed equally to this work. 2 and in particular the Newtonian potential. The critical point of the debate originating from these results [29, 30] is whether any quantum feature of the gravitational field can be deduced from this experiment, provided that entanglement between the masses is measured. One of the crucial points of the debate is that experiments only involving Newtonian gravity only test the gauge component of the gravitational field, which is not quantised in the standard formalism [30]. This criticism is valid, however there is an important caveat: it is possible to devise a thought experiment where, with analogous arguments to those employed in the electromagnetic version of the same experiment [31, 32], one runs into faster-than-light signalling unless some quantum-field elements of the gravitational field are included in the description [21]. This hints at the fact that the Newtonian field itself has some information content, and thus the discussion cannot be simply dismissed as inconclusive on the nature of the gravitational field [22]. In part, the disagreement around these topics arises from the fact that different definitions of what it means for the gravitational field to be quantum have been used in the literature. Some authors [10, 11, 23] argue that the existence of a superposition of spacetimes is a sufficient feature to deem the gravitational field as quantum; others invoke the result that Local Operations and Classical Communication (LOCC) do not generate entanglement [33] as a criterion to establish the quantum nature of the gravitational field [15, 16, 20, 27, 28]. Another possibility is that gravity can be considered quantum only if quantised radiation (i.e., gravitons) is emitted [30]. Finally, there has been an attempt to understand whether gravity can be compatible with some so-called post- quantum theories, i.e., theories that are neither classical nor quantum [34, 35], within the framework of constructor theory [36] (see Appendix F for a comparison with the approach presented here). All these approaches, with the exception of the one in Ref. [34, 35], make statements about the nature of the gravitational field by considering the field by itself, without specifically referring to the set of all possible measurements. However, in order to have a full characterisation of a physical theory, one needs to consider, together with the set of states (in this case, of the two systems and the gravitational field) and their transformations, also the set of all possible measurements. If the latter is neglected, it might happen that a specific state could seem quantum, but that its quantum behaviour never manifests itself in any possible experiment. An additional difficulty in experiments in which gravity is sourced by quantum systems is that the full set of measurements is not accessible to us: we cannot directly measure the (possibly) quantised gravitational radiation to establish whether gravity is quantum. Hence, we need to resort to probing the nature of the gravitational field indirectly through the matter systems. The need to verify via indirect measurements whether some degree of freedom is quantum is not special to the gravitational field but happens, for instance, in the Stern-Gerlach experiment: we infer the quantum nature of the spin degree of freedom not by directly probing it, but by measuring the deflection of a quantum particle traversing a magnetic field. The question we here ask is then: \Provided that we observe gravitationally-induced entanglement in the laboratory, which conclusions can we draw on the nature of the gravitational field?” The answer to this question is nontrivial, because, in order to give a fully consistent answer, we cannot assume an underlying theory for the gravitational field. We therefore have to check the consistency of our experimental results in a systematic way, taking into account all logically-possible theories. This task is precisely what Generalised Probabilistic Theories (GPTs) have been useful for in the context of non-relativistic quantum theory. For example, GPTs have been used in the study of thermodynamics [37{40], interference [41{46], decoherence [47{50], computation [51{57], cryptography [58{63], contextuality [64{67], information processing [68{75], and correlations [76{ 82] as well as deepening our understanding of the general structure of physical theories [83{98] in a way that does not presuppose the quantum formalism but instead studies these phenomena in a theory-agnostic way. The basic idea of the formalism, is that any theory of physics should be able 3 to make operational, potentially probabilistic, predictions about the outcomes of experiments. This does not mean that a theory cannot, and should not, do more than this by providing an ontological level of description, but, that the operational level of description is a necessary prerequisite of any good physical theory. It is this operational level of description which is captured by the framework of GPTs. One imposes simple mathematical axioms on the structure of the theory, which faithfully capture the conceptual operational underpinnings, and, by doing so, one can derive a rich mathematical structure which any GPT must have. For example, this means that we are no longer free to propose arbitrary modifications of quantum theory, but, having proposed a particular modification, we must then check that it is indeed compatible with the basic mathematical axioms { for example, that probabilistic predictions must be valued in the interval [0; 1]. In this paper, we introduce the theoretical tools of GPTs to determine whether gravity can be classical, quantum, or a different type of theory when gravity-induced entanglement between two massive bodies is observed in the laboratory. We prove a no-go theorem stating that it is impossible to satisfy at the same time the following conditions: i) gravity is a no-signalling theory; ii) gravity is a physical degree of freedom which mediates the gravitational interaction; iii) gravity is classicalx. Assuming that such gravitationally induced entanglement is observed, we argue that conditions i) and ii) should be met, and hence that the gravitational field is non-classical. The violation of iii) does not necessarily mean that gravity is quantum. There are, in fact, other possibilities, which are neither classical nor quantum, which we explore.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 1 Introduction and Overview
    Chapter 1 Introduction and Overview Particle physics is the most fundamental science there is. It is the study of the ultimate constituents of matter (the elementray particles) and of how these particles interact with one another (the fundamental forces). The primary aim of this module is to introduce you to what people mean when they refer to the Standard Model of Particle Physics To do this we need to describe the very small (via quantum mechanics) and the very fast since when elementary particles move, they travel at or close to the speed of light (via special relativity). These requirements demand we work in the language of Quantum Field Theory(QFT). QFT as a subject is a huge (and rather advanced) subject in its own right but thankfully we will be able to use a prescriptive (and rather simple) approach to the QFT which is embodied in the Feynman Rules - for those who want to go further into the theoretical structure of the Standard Model see module PX430 - Gauge Theories of Particle Physics. It is a remarkable fact that, theoretically, the fundamental interactions derive from an invariance of the QFT with respect to certain internal symmetry transformations known as local gauge transformations. The resulting dynamical theories of electromagnetism, the weak interaction and the strong interaction and known respectively as Quantum Elec- trodynamics(QED), the electroweak (or Glashow-Weinberg-Salam) theory and Quantum Chromodynamics(QCD). It is this collection of local gauge theories which have become known as the Standard Model(SM). N.B. Gravity plays a negligible role in Particle Physics and a workable quantum theory of gravity does not exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Pulsar,Pulsar Timing Array,And Gravitational Experiments
    Pulsar,pulsar timing array,and gravitational experiments K. J. Lee ( 李柯伽 ) Kavli institute for astronomy and astrophysics, Peking university [email protected] 2019 Outline ● Pulsars ● Gravitational wave ● Gravitational wave detection using pulsar timing array Why we care about gravity theories? ● Two fundamental philosophical questions ● What is the space? ● What is the time? ● Gravity theory is about the fundamental understanding of the background, on which other physics happens, i.e. space and time ● Define the ultimate boundary of any civilization ● After GR, it is clear that the physical description and research of space time will be gravitational physics. ● But this idea can be traced back to nearly 300 years ago Parallel transport. Locally, the surface is flat, one can define the parallel transport. However after a global round trip, the direction will be different. b+db v b V' a a+da The mathematics describing the intrinsic curvature is the Riemannian tensor. Riemannian =0 <==> flat surface The energy density is just the curvature! Gravity theory is theory of space and time! Geometrical interpretation Transverse and traceless i.e. conserve spatial volume to the first order + x Generation of GW R In GW astronomy, we are detecting h~1/R. Increasing sensitivity by a a factor of 10, the number of source is 1000 times. For other detector, they depend on energy flux, which goes as 1/R^2, number of source increase as 100 times. Is GW real? ● Does GW carry energy? – Bondi 1950s ● Can we measure it? – Yes, we can find the gauge invariant form! GW detector ● Bar detector Laser interferometer as GW detector ● Interferometer has long history.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Dimensional Equation of State for Core-Collapse Supernova Matter
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 5-2013 Three Dimensional Equation of State for Core-Collapse Supernova Matter Helena Sofia de Castro Felga Ramos Pais [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Other Astrophysics and Astronomy Commons Recommended Citation de Castro Felga Ramos Pais, Helena Sofia, "Three Dimensional Equation of State for Core-Collapse Supernova Matter. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2013. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1712 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Helena Sofia de Castro Felga Ramos Pais entitled "Three Dimensional Equation of State for Core-Collapse Supernova Matter." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Physics. Michael W. Guidry, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: William Raphael Hix, Joshua Emery, Jirina R. Stone Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Three Dimensional Equation of State for Core-Collapse Supernova Matter A Dissertation Presented for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Helena Sofia de Castro Felga Ramos Pais May 2013 c by Helena Sofia de Castro Felga Ramos Pais, 2013 All Rights Reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometric Justification of the Fundamental Interaction Fields For
    S S symmetry Article Geometric Justification of the Fundamental Interaction Fields for the Classical Long-Range Forces Vesselin G. Gueorguiev 1,2,* and Andre Maeder 3 1 Institute for Advanced Physical Studies, Sofia 1784, Bulgaria 2 Ronin Institute for Independent Scholarship, 127 Haddon Pl., Montclair, NJ 07043, USA 3 Geneva Observatory, University of Geneva, Chemin des Maillettes 51, CH-1290 Sauverny, Switzerland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Based on the principle of reparametrization invariance, the general structure of physically relevant classical matter systems is illuminated within the Lagrangian framework. In a straight- forward way, the matter Lagrangian contains background interaction fields, such as a 1-form field analogous to the electromagnetic vector potential and symmetric tensor for gravity. The geometric justification of the interaction field Lagrangians for the electromagnetic and gravitational interactions are emphasized. The generalization to E-dimensional extended objects (p-branes) embedded in a bulk space M is also discussed within the light of some familiar examples. The concept of fictitious accelerations due to un-proper time parametrization is introduced, and its implications are discussed. The framework naturally suggests new classical interaction fields beyond electromagnetism and gravity. The simplest model with such fields is analyzed and its relevance to dark matter and dark energy phenomena on large/cosmological scales is inferred. Unusual pathological behavior in the Newtonian limit is suggested to be a precursor of quantum effects and of inflation-like processes at microscopic scales. Citation: Gueorguiev, V.G.; Maeder, A. Geometric Justification of Keywords: diffeomorphism invariant systems; reparametrization-invariant matter systems; matter the Fundamental Interaction Fields lagrangian; homogeneous singular lagrangians; relativistic particle; string theory; extended objects; for the Classical Long-Range Forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary Research Hub for Fundamental Symmetries
    Section A - Executive Summary Research Hub for Fundamental Symmetries, Neutrinos, and Applications to Nuclear Astrophysics: The Inner Space/Outer Space/Cyber Space Connections of Nuclear Physics Intellectual Merit: The first goal of this proposal is to create a coordinated NSF national theory effort at the nuclear physics core of three of the most exciting \discovery" areas of physics: ◦ Neutrino Physics: Beyond-the-standard model (BSM) physics of neutrinos, including their mixing phenomena on earth and in extreme astrophysical environments; the absolute mass scale and the eigenstate behavior under particle-antiparticle conjugation, and the implication of mass and lepton number violation for cosmological evolution; and the relevance of neutri- nos to astrophysics both in transporting energy and lepton number, and as a probe of the otherwise hidden physics that governs the cores of stars and compact objects. ◦ Dense Matter: The recent start of Advanced LIGO Run 1 could well lead to the observation of the gravitational wave signatures from neutron star (NS) mergers by the end of the decade. This follows the observation of a NS of nearly two solar masses by Shapiro delay, and of \black-widow" systems hinting of even higher masses. Current and anticipated observations provide unprecedented opportunities to determine nuclear matter properties at densities and isospins not otherwise reachable, and to relate them to those we measure in laboratory nuclei. ◦ Dark Matter: Definitive evidence that dark matter (DM) dominates our universe is the second demonstration of BSM physics. Nuclear physics can play an important role in this field by helping direct-detection experimenters understand the variety and nature of the possible responses of their nuclear targets, by connecting the stellar processes we study to the feedback mechanisms that can alter galactic structure, and by contributing to the understanding of composite dark matter in cases where lattice QCD methods are relevant.
    [Show full text]
  • THE STANDARD MODEL of FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLES and THEIR INTERACTIONS by the STANDARD MODEL Mesgun Sebhatu of FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLES and THEIR INTERACTIONS 1
    MISN-0-305 THE STANDARD MODEL OF FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLES AND THEIR INTERACTIONS by THE STANDARD MODEL Mesgun Sebhatu OF FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLES AND THEIR INTERACTIONS 1. Overview . 1 2. Historical Introduction a. Gravity . 2 b. Electromagnetism . 2 RUN 7339 EVENT 1279 c. The Weak \Nuclear" Force . 3 e+ e- d. The Strong \Nuclear" Force . 4 ET = 50 GeV ET = 11 GeV 3. The Standard Model a. Symmetry . 5 b. Constituents and Mediators of the Standard Model . 6 c. Weak Isospin and W Bosons . 7 d. Electroweak Theory . 7 e. Spontaneously Broken Symmetry|Phase Transition . 8 + 27 3.0 f. Higgs Bosons . 8 0.0 + g. Relations Between Electroweak Theory Parameters . 9 f h h. Experimental Detection of the W Boson . 9 - i. The Uni¯cation of QCD and Electroweak Theory . 10 90 .0 -3.0 Acknowledgments . 13 Project PHYSNET·Physics Bldg.·Michigan State University·East Lansing, MI 1 2 ID Sheet: MISN-0-305 THIS IS A DEVELOPMENTAL-STAGE PUBLICATION Title: The Standard Model of Fundamental Particles and Their OF PROJECT PHYSNET Interactions The goal of our project is to assist a network of educators and scientists in Author: Mesgun Sebhatu, Department of Physics, Winthrop College, transferring physics from one person to another. We support manuscript Rock Hill, SC 29733 processing and distribution, along with communication and information Version: 11/14/2001 Evaluation: Stage 0 systems. We also work with employers to identify basic scienti¯c skills as well as physics topics that are needed in science and technology. A Length: 2 hr; 20 pages number of our publications are aimed at assisting users in acquiring such Input Skills: skills.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Interactions and Interfaces in Engineering Design
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Sep 24, 2021 Defining Interactions and Interfaces in Engineering Design Parslov, Jakob Filippson Publication date: 2016 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Parslov, J. F. (2016). Defining Interactions and Interfaces in Engineering Design. Technical University of Denmark. DCAMM Special Report No. S200 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Defi ning Interactions and Interfaces in Engineering Design PhD Thesis Jakob Filippson Parslov DCAMM Special Report No. S200 March 2016 Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Defining Interactions and Interfaces in Engineering Design by Jakob Filippson Parslov Department of Mechanical Engineering Technical University of Denmark March, 2016 Defining Interactions and Interfaces in Engineering Design Jakob Filippson Parslov Section of Engineering Design and Product Development Department of Mechanical Engineering Technical University of Denmark Produktionstorvet, Bld.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pulsar (Portmanteau of Pulsating Star) Is a Highly Magnetized, Rotating Neutron Star That Emits a Beam of Electromagnetic Radiation
    What was the problem with the original Hubble mirror? The telescope mirror was distorted. Why the Hubble telescope has to operate in space? The atmospheric blurring affects the view on Earth just like ripples in water warp the objects below the surface. What fundamental interaction explains the formation of galaxies? Gravitational interaction. What are black holes? Singularities of space-time, where space is infinitely curved. Their gravitational field is so strong that nothing can escape from a black hole. What are worm holes? A wormhole, also known as an Einstein–Rosen bridge, is a hypothetical topological feature of spacetime that would be fundamentally a "shortcut" through spacetime. What is a quasar? What are quasars? A quasi-stellar radio source ("quasar", /ˈkweɪzɑr/) is a very energetic and distant active galactic nucleus. What is a pulsar? A pulsar (portmanteau of pulsating star) is a highly magnetized, rotating neutron star that emits a beam of electromagnetic radiation. What are stellar nebulae? A nebula (from Latin: "cloud";[1] pl. nebulae or nebulæ, with ligature, or nebulas) is an interstellar cloud of dust, hydrogen, helium and other ionized gases. How do we observe gravitational lensing? A gravitational lens refers to a distribution of plates (such as a cluster of galaxies) between a distant source (a background galaxy) and an observer, that is capable of bending (lensing) the light from the source, as it travels towards the observer. This effect is known as gravitational lensing and is one of the predictions of Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity. When and how the universe was born? In a process called Big Bang about 13.7 billion years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Let's Have a Coffee with the Standard Model of Particle Physics!
    Physics Education PAPER • OPEN ACCESS Related content - Exploring the standard model of particles Let’s have a coffee with the Standard Model of K E Johansson and P M Watkins - Physics at the Large Hadron Collider. particle physics! Higgs boson (Scientific session of the Physical Sciences Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 26 February 2014) To cite this article: Julia Woithe et al 2017 Phys. Educ. 52 034001 - Consistency in the construction and use ofFeynman diagrams Peter Dunne View the article online for updates and enhancements. Recent citations - Pitfalls in the teaching of elementary particle physics Oliver Passon et al - A machine of superlatives Niels Tuning - An argument against global no miracles arguments Florian J. Boge This content was downloaded from IP address 141.30.247.98 on 13/06/2019 at 20:56 IOP Physics Education Phys. Educ. 52 P A P ER Phys. Educ. 52 (2017) 034001 (9pp) iopscience.org/ped 2017 Let’s have a coffee with the © 2017 IOP Publishing Ltd Standard Model of particle PHEDA7 physics! 034001 Julia Woithe1,2, Gerfried J Wiener1,3 J Woithe et al and Frederik F Van der Veken1 1 CERN, European Organization for Nuclear Research, Geneva, Switzerland Let’s have a coffee with the Standard Model of particle physics! 2 Department of Physics/Physics Education Group, University of Kaiserslautern, Germany 3 Austrian Educational Competence Centre Physics, University of Vienna, Austria Printed in the UK E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] and [email protected] PED Abstract The Standard Model of particle physics is one of the most successful theories 10.1088/1361-6552/aa5b25 in physics and describes the fundamental interactions between elementary particles.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article STANDARD MODEL of PARTICLE PHYSICS—A
    Review Article STANDARD MODEL OF PARTICLE PHYSICS—A HEALTH PHYSICS PERSPECTIVE J. J. Bevelacqua* publications describing the operation of the Large Hadron Abstract—The Standard Model of Particle Physics is reviewed Collider and popular books and articles describing Higgs with an emphasis on its relationship to the physics supporting the health physics profession. Concepts important to health bosons, magnetic monopoles, supersymmetry particles, physics are emphasized and specific applications are pre- dark matter, dark energy, and new particle discoveries sented. The capability of the Standard Model to provide health (PDG 2008). Many of the students’ questions arise from physics relevant information is illustrated with application of conservation laws to neutron and muon decay and in the misconceptions regarding the Standard Model and its rela- calculation of the neutron mean lifetime. tionship to the field of health physics (Bevelacqua 2008a). Health Phys. 99(5):613–623; 2010 The increasing number and complexity of these questions Key words: accelerators; beta particles; computer calcula- and misconceptions of the Standard Model motivated the tions; neutrons author to write this review article. The intent of this paper is to present the Standard Model to health physicists in a manner that minimizes the INTRODUCTION mathematical complexity. This is a challenge because the THE THEORETICAL formulation describing the properties Standard Model of Particle Physics is a theory of interacting and interactions of fundamental particles is embodied in fields. It contains the electroweak interaction (Glashow the Standard Model of Particle Physics (Bettini 2008; 1961; Weinberg 1967; Salam 1969) and quantum chromo- Cottingham and Greenwood 2007; Guidry 1999; Grif- dynamics (QCD) (Gross and Wilczek 1973; Politzer 1973).
    [Show full text]
  • Gravitation: the Most Fundamental Interaction
    Gravitation: the most fundamental interaction Johan Hansson* Division of Physics Lule˚aUniversityof Technology SE-971 87 Lule˚a,Sweden Abstract The comprehensive analysis by Niels Bohr shows that the classical world is a necessary additional independent structure not derivable from quantum mechanics. The results of measurement must be ex- pressed classically; there must be a classical region of every experiment where physicists can set apparatus, read pointers and so on. As we will see, the events constituting spacetime of general relativity is this classical structure. Hence, gravitation is required to make the for- mal quantum mechanical coexistence of many mutually incompatible possibilities result in the concrete reality of the normal world, mak- ing gravitation the most fundamental interaction. It also means that \Quantum Gravity" is a pseudo-problem, a mirage, \Quantum Space- time" an oxymoron. *[email protected] 1 Gravitation presents the opportunity to connect, and resolve, two of the outstanding unsolved problems in fundamental physics: 1.) \Quantum Gravity" - that is, how quantum mechanics can be made to \peacefully coexist" with general relativity. 2.) \The Quantum Measurement Problem" - that is, how the ghostly co-existing superpositions of many mutually incompatible possibilities in the formalism of quantum mechanics - linear probability amplitudes - turn into the real world of concrete occurrences that we experience, even though both we and our measuring instruments are made of atoms described by quantum mechanics. From what we today know about nature a solution of the mea- surement problem must be nonlinear, to break quantum superposition1, and nonlocal, required by Bell's theorem [7] and its numerous experimental tests [8], showing correlation of space-like separated events.
    [Show full text]
  • About Face 3: the Essentials of Interaction Design, Third Edition
    01_084113 ffirs.qxp 4/3/07 5:59 PM Page iii About Face 3 The Essentials of Interaction Design Alan Cooper, Robert Reimann, and Dave Cronin 01_084113 ffirs.qxp 4/3/07 5:59 PM Page ii 01_084113 ffirs.qxp 4/3/07 5:59 PM Page i About Face 3 01_084113 ffirs.qxp 4/3/07 5:59 PM Page ii 01_084113 ffirs.qxp 4/3/07 5:59 PM Page iii About Face 3 The Essentials of Interaction Design Alan Cooper, Robert Reimann, and Dave Cronin 01_084113 ffirs.qxp 4/3/07 5:59 PM Page iv About Face 3: The Essentials of Interaction Design Published by Wiley Publishing, Inc. 10475 Crosspoint Boulevard Indianapolis, IN 46256 www.wiley.com Copyright © 2007 Alan Cooper Published by Wiley Publishing, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana Published simultaneously in Canada ISBN: 978-0-470-08411-3 Manufactured in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except as permitted under Sec- tions 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Pub- lisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8600. Requests to the Publisher for permis- sion should be addressed to the Legal Department, Wiley Publishing, Inc., 10475 Crosspoint Blvd., Indianapolis, IN 46256, (317) 572-3447, fax (317) 572-4355, or online at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions.
    [Show full text]