Core 1..188 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 15.25)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Core 1..188 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 15.25) House of Commons Debates VOLUME 146 Ï NUMBER 212 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 41st PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, February 15, 2013 Speaker: The Honourable Andrew Scheer CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 14187 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, February 15, 2013 The House met at 10 a.m. prorogation, those bills simply did not get through the House and were dropped. The next event that is of some importance is the Auditor General's Prayers report of 2009. The Auditor General made it crystal clear that there were major costs imposed by not acting more expeditiously in this area. I would like to read a few of the key recommendations that GOVERNMENT ORDERS were made by the Auditor General in 2009. Ï (1005) [Translation] [English] She said: TECHNICAL TAX AMENDMENTS ACT, 2012 For taxpayers, the negative effects of uncertainty may include The House resumed from January 28 consideration of the motion " higher costs of obtaining professional advice to comply with tax law; that Bill C-48, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Excise Tax " less efficiency in doing business transactions; Act, the Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act, the First Nations Goods and Services Tax Act and related legislation, be read " inability of publicly traded corporations to use proposed tax changes in their the second time and referred to a committee. financial reporting, because they have not been “substantively enacted”; Hon. John McCallum (Markham—Unionville, Lib.): Mr. " greater cynicism about the fairness of the tax system; and Speaker, I am pleased to rise on the subject of Bill C-48, which is " increased willingness to use aggressive tax plans. now before the House. The bill could be termed a housecleaning bill, which does not mean that it is unimportant because it is important to She continued: keep one's house clean and in this case we are talking about the For the tax administrator, the negative effects may include cleanliness of our tax system. The bill enacts into law previous comfort letters and other statements by the Department of Finance, " higher costs for providing additional guidance and interpretations to taxpayers and tax auditors; and which have already been enacted by CRA but which are not yet enshrined in the law. " higher administrative costs for reprocessing the tax returns after an outstanding legislative amendment is enacted and for obtaining waivers to extend the As I will indicate, the Liberal Party will support the bill. Our only limitation period for reassessment. complaint is that it is far too long in coming. There have been [English] massive delays to the point where the bill is almost 1,000 pages long with, I believe, 40-something amendments. This has caused great These points are extremely clear. The Auditor General makes it cost and great uncertainty to the tax system. We believe that it is very clear that the absence of housecleaning legislation presented simply bad public administration that the government should have promptly imposes major costs on taxpayers in terms of their ability delayed so long in bringing the legislation forward. to understand the law, their need for professional advice and also The last housecleaning tax bill passed by Parliament was in 2001, imposes greater delays on rulings by CRA, which further reduce the almost 12 years ago. We believe as a matter of course such bills efficiency of the system. should come before the House every year, so that the complexity of the tax system would be alleviated and taxpayers would have a Following the Auditor General's report, the parliamentary clearer idea of what their rights and obligations are. committee on public accounts met and I would like to read its recommendations, which were published in the year 2010: Let me begin by going through a little bit of the sad, lengthy history, which has led us from 12 years ago when the last bill was [Translation] passed to where we are today. As I said, in 2001, a tax housecleaning RECOMMENDATION 1 bill was passed, 12 years ago. The Liberal government prepared That the Department of Finance Canada facilitate the elimination of the backlog another one but then was defeated. The Conservatives made two by ensuring that bills making technical amendments to the Income Tax Act only attempts but both failed. Because of an election or because of relate to technical tax matters. 14188 COMMONS DEBATES February 15, 2013 Government Orders RECOMMENDATION 2 that effectively changes the system, unless it is placed in law within a That the Department of Finance Canada not wait until technical amendments bills certain time, such as a year or two years, it sunsets. It disappears. are passed by Parliament before releasing further proposed amendments to the This would be a good change to the system because it would be an Income Tax Act for comment. incentive for the Department of Finance or the government to RECOMMENDATION 3 implement these housecleaning bills annually or expeditiously so as That once the current backlog of technical amendments is passed, the Department of Finance Canada should prepare annual technical amendments bills for to reduce this growing complication of Canada's tax system. consideration by Parliament. RECOMMENDATION 4 Ï (1010) That the Canada Revenue Agency provide by 31 March 2011 a progress report to the Public Accounts Committee on actions taken to address the recommendations contained in Chapter 3 of the Auditor General’s November 2009 Report. However, as members will have heard from these quotes, the issue [English] goes further than simply these housecleaning bills. It has been 12 years since our last housecleaning bill and close to 50 years since our It is clear as we stand now, in 2013, that these recommendations of last full-scale examination of Canada's tax system. The last time that the public accounts committee were not followed. It called for this was done, I believe, the report was issued in 1966 and it was done by housekeeping legislation to be presented on an annual basis. It called the Carter commission. The accountants and I say that it is high time for a reduction in the time that CRA took to give its tax opinions or we have another overall study of Canada's tax system with a view to directions. This has not happened. The time has gotten longer, not simplifying it and making it more competitive, less complex and shorter. Again, I would argue that this is a case of really bad public more fair. This would be a major undertaking, and since it has not administration in an area that is not particularly exciting to the public been done in almost 50 years, it is high time that we do it. but is, nevertheless, critical to the good functioning of our economy. Now, one would think that accountants, of all people, would love One obvious unfairness, which would become apparent if such a tax complexity because they are paid for helping people to complete study were done, is the operation of our tax credits. The government their taxes. If the system is more complex, they are needed even offers tax credits for young soccer players or young violinists. Some more and they would make more money. However, quite to the economists would prefer that such measures be put into overall cuts contrary, both the chartered accountants and the certified general in income tax, but that is another issue. My point is that these tax accountants have recently been arguing very strongly in favour of credits are grossly unfair because they deliberately exclude those expeditious passing of the legislation as well as a more general people whose income is not high enough to pay significant tax. reform of the tax system. Therefore, low-income Canadians' sons and daughters might want to I would like to read from both the recommendations of the play soccer or the violin just as much as a child of a higher-income chartered accountants and the certified general accountants on these Canadian, but because their income is low and they do not pay tax or issues. In 2010, the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants much tax, they are excluded from the benefit. That is a gross said: unfairness. Item number one in reforming our tax system would be to make those tax credits refundable so that they are available for all Reducing complexity in Canada’s domestic tax regime is crucial to easing the regulatory burden placed on Canadian businesses and attracting investment. Canadians and not just for well-heeled Canadians. Simplifying our tax system would make the country more competitive and allow both individuals and business to prosper. According to The Global Competitiveness Report 2010 – 2011 issued by the World Economic Forum, tax regulations are among That is just one tiny item in the overall scheme of things. We need the top four most problematic factors cited by business executives for doing business an overall review of our tax system, which has not happened for in Canada. Many aspects of Canada’s tax system have become much too complex. nearly 50 years, and it is high time that this was done. We do support We recommend that the government establish a national consultation process to examine tax simplification measures. the bill. Our complaint is that it is far too late in coming. This is a government that talks all the time about caring only about the economy, about being competitive, about attracting foreign I will go over a few of the provisions of the bill. I obviously investment, and yet tax complexity is number four on the list of cannot cover in detail the nearly 1,000 pages of changed legislation.
Recommended publications
  • Core 1..39 Journalweekly (PRISM::Advent3b2 10.50)
    HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA 40th PARLIAMENT, 3rd SESSION 40e LÉGISLATURE, 3e SESSION Journals Journaux No. 2 No 2 Thursday, March 4, 2010 Le jeudi 4 mars 2010 10:00 a.m. 10 heures PRAYERS PRIÈRE DAILY ROUTINE OF BUSINESS AFFAIRES COURANTES ORDINAIRES TABLING OF DOCUMENTS DÉPÔT DE DOCUMENTS Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Conformément à l'article 32(2) du Règlement, M. Lukiwski Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of (secrétaire parlementaire du leader du gouvernement à la Chambre Commons) laid upon the Table, — Government responses, des communes) dépose sur le Bureau, — Réponses du pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions: gouvernement, conformément à l’article 36(8) du Règlement, aux pétitions suivantes : — Nos. 402-1109 to 402-1111, 402-1132, 402-1147, 402-1150, — nos 402-1109 to 402-1111, 402-1132, 402-1147, 402-1150, 402- 402-1185, 402-1222, 402-1246, 402-1259, 402-1321, 402-1336, 1185, 402-1222, 402-1246, 402-1259, 402-1321, 402-1336, 402- 402-1379, 402-1428, 402-1485, 402-1508 and 402-1513 1379, 402-1428, 402-1485, 402-1508 et 402-1513 au sujet du concerning the Employment Insurance Program. — Sessional régime d'assurance-emploi. — Document parlementaire no 8545- Paper No. 8545-403-1-01; 403-1-01; — Nos. 402-1129, 402-1174 and 402-1268 concerning national — nos 402-1129, 402-1174 et 402-1268 au sujet des parcs parks. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-403-2-01; nationaux. — Document parlementaire no 8545-403-2-01; — Nos.
    [Show full text]
  • The Restoration of Heritage Properties a Tax Credit
    A TAX CREDIT FOR THE RESTORATION OF HERITAGE PROPERTIES ASK YOUR MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT TO SUPPORT BILL C-323 An Act to Amend the Income Tax Act (Rehabilitation of Historic Property) Peter Van Loan, MP Bill C-323 What People Saying about Bill C-323: "This is an idea that has had widespread support from heritage advocates, federal, provincial, territorial and municipal governments, and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities over the years. It’s exciting to see it tabled in the House and given first reading. We know that the tax system can be a powerful tool to stimulate private investment in heritage buildings. In the United States, the introduction of a 20 percent federal tax credit for rehabilitation of heritage buildings 40 years ago revolutionized the way developers think about old buildings and launched a booming and competitive preservation industry." – National Trust for Canada The Fairmont Empress Hotel—Victoria, BC Contact Your MP, and Tell Them to Support Bill C-323 Write them at: House of Commons, Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6 Or, phone or email them. Bill C-323 What is Bill C-323? A tax credit that will seek to limit the destruction of Canada’s heritage buildings, and instead encourage the rehabilitation of these culturally significant buildings The Bill would also allow owners to write-off spending on heritage restoration at a faster rate than is currently the case Why introduce Bill C-323? There is a tremendous public interest in the preservation and restoration of heritage properties. But the cost burden of doing so is usually more expensive to owners than other alternatives—like demolition and new construction This Bill helps owners who are preserving heritage buildings with the cost of delivering this public benefit The pilot program for this policy was very successful in encouraging investment from private individuals and businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..186 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 10.50)
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 141 Ï NUMBER 051 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 39th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, September 22, 2006 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 3121 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, September 22, 2006 The House met at 11 a.m. Foreign Affairs, the actions of the minority Conservative govern- ment are causing the Canadian business community to miss the boat when it comes to trade and investment in China. Prayers The Canadian Chamber of Commerce is calling on the Conservative minority government to bolster Canadian trade and investment in China and encourage Chinese companies to invest in STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS Canada. Business leaders are not alone in their desire for a stronger Ï (1100) economic relationship with China. The Asia-Pacific Foundation [English] released an opinion poll last week where Canadians named China, not the United States, as the most important potential export market CANADIAN FORCES for Canada. Mr. Pierre Lemieux (Glengarry—Prescott—Russell, CPC): Mr. Speaker, I recently met with a special family in my riding. The The Conservatives' actions are being noticed by the Chinese Spence family has a long, proud tradition of military service going government, which recently shut down negotiations to grant Canada back several generations. The father, Rick Spence, is a 27 year approved destination status, effectively killing a multi-million dollar veteran who serves in our Canadian air force. opportunity to allow Chinese tourists to visit Canada. His son, Private Michael Spence, is a member of the 1st Battalion China's ambassador has felt the need to say that we need mutual of the Royal Canadian Regiment.
    [Show full text]
  • Hill Times, Health Policy Review, 17NOV2014
    TWENTY-FIFTH YEAR, NO. 1260 CANADA’S POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT NEWSWEEKLY MONDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2014 $4.00 HEARD ON THE HILL BUZZ NEWS HARASSMENT Artist paints Queen, other prominent MPs like ‘kings, queens in their people, wants a national portrait gallery little domains,’ contribute to ‘culture of silence’: Clancy BY LAURA RYCKEWAERT “The combination of power and testosterone often leads, unfortu- n arm’s-length process needs nately, to poor judgment, especially Ato be established to deal in a system where there has been with allegations of misconduct no real process to date,” said Nancy or harassment—sexual and Peckford, executive director of otherwise—on Parliament Hill, Equal Voice Canada, a multi-par- say experts, as the culture on tisan organization focused on the Hill is more conducive to getting more women elected. inappropriate behaviour than the average workplace. Continued on page 14 NEWS HARASSMENT Campbell, Proctor call on two unnamed NDP harassment victims to speak up publicly BY ABBAS RANA Liberal Senator and a former A NDP MP say the two un- identifi ed NDP MPs who have You don’t say: Queen Elizabeth, oil on canvas, by artist Lorena Ziraldo. Ms. Ziraldo said she got fed up that Ottawa doesn’t have accused two now-suspended a national portrait gallery, so started her own, kind of, or at least until Nov. 22. Read HOH p. 2. Photograph courtesy of Lorena Ziraldo Liberal MPs of “serious person- al misconduct” should identify themselves publicly and share their experiences with Canadians, NEWS LEGISLATION arguing that it is not only a ques- tion of fairness, but would also be returns on Monday, as the race helpful to address the issue in a Feds to push ahead on begins to move bills through the transparent fashion.
    [Show full text]
  • Slow Senate Start Amid Pandemic a Lesson to Limit Delay Tactics, Says
    Fourni par InfoMédia http://www.infomedia.gc.ca/parl Provided by NewsDesk Publié | Published: 2020-11-04 Hill Times Reçu | Received: 2020-11-04 00:01 (HNE) Slow Senate start amid pandemic a lesson to limit delay tactics, says CSG leader 'Our job is not to play procedural inside baseball around organization of the Senate, and we've done a lot of that, and I'm tired of it,' says Sen. Scott Tannas. Samantha Wright Allen With Senators finally nailing down hybrid sittings and striking committees after months of disagreement that led to limited work during the pandemic, one Senate leader says his colleagues have learned their lesson about capitulating to procedural delays and will likely have "little patience" for such tactics going forward. "Our job is not to play procedural inside baseball around organization of the Senate, and we've done a lot of that, and I'm tired of it. A lot of people are tired of it," said Canadian Senators Group Leader Scott Tannas. One example of that inside baseball played out on Oct. 29, said the Alberta Senator, with the long path to setting up committees coming to an end. The agreement guarantees allocated committee seats stay with various groups rather than individual Senators, which some said leaves powers in leaders' hands and violates the rules granting rights to Senators. The Progressive Senate Group (PSG), the smallest of the four recognized groups, said the vote in the Chamber-held before hybrid sittings were instituted-was done at the expense of giving all Senators a voice, while the other three groups said a clear majority supported the move.
    [Show full text]
  • Debates of the Senate
    CANADA Debates of the Senate 3rd SESSION . 40th PARLIAMENT . VOLUME 147 . NUMBER 53 OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, October 5, 2010 ^ THE HONOURABLE NOËL A. KINSELLA SPEAKER This issue contains the latest listing of Senators, Officers of the Senate and the Ministry. CONTENTS (Daily index of proceedings appears at back of this issue). Debates Services: D'Arcy McPherson, National Press Building, Room 906, Tel. 613-995-5756 Publications Centre: David Reeves, National Press Building, Room 926, Tel. 613-947-0609 Published by the Senate Available from PWGSC ± Publishing and Depository Services, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0S5. Also available on the Internet: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1118 THE SENATE Tuesday, October 5, 2010 The Senate met at 2 p.m., the Speaker in the chair. ROLE OF AVAAZ IN CANADIAN DEMOCRACY Prayers. Hon. Bob Runciman: Honourable senators, I rise today to draw attention to a foreign organization that spent tens of thousands of dollars to influence the results of the last federal election campaign in a manner that does not appear in keeping with the SENATORS' STATEMENTS spirit of our election laws. That U.S.-based organization even today is working hard to influence public policy and subvert Canadian democracy. No, honourable senators, I am not talking about the National Rifle Association. I am referring to Avaaz, a THE LATE IRVING SCHWARTZ, O.C. shadowy foreign organization that has been linked to American billionaire George Soros. Hon. Catherine S. Callbeck: Honourable senators, this country has lost one of its most visionary entrepreneurs and committed This group has attempted to influence Canadian environmental community leaders in the recent passing of Irving Schwartz of policy and, in the last election campaign, spent tens of thousands Sydney, Nova Scotia.
    [Show full text]
  • Debates of the Senate
    Debates of the Senate 1st SESSION . 42nd PARLIAMENT . VOLUME 150 . NUMBER 52 OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, June 17, 2016 The Honourable GEORGE J. FUREY Speaker CONTENTS (Daily index of proceedings appears at back of this issue). Debates Services: D'Arcy McPherson, National Press Building, Room 906, Tel. 613-995-5756 Publications Centre: Kim Laughren, National Press Building, Room 926, Tel. 613-947-0609 Published by the Senate Available on the Internet: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1207 THE SENATE Friday, June 17, 2016 The Senate met at 9 a.m., the Speaker in the chair. quarantine of Iranian society so that they may more firmly hold it in their grip. Prayers. Honourable senators, newspaper reports suggest that our federal government is ``actively engaged'' in this case and SENATORS' STATEMENTS working closely with allies to assist Homa Hoodfar. It is my hope that their efforts to free both Saeed Malekpour and Homa Hoodfar from the malign and criminal Iranian regime IRAN will be successful. DETENTION OF HOMA HOODFAR In the meantime, I know that all honourable senators will continue to follow their cases with deep concern as we continue to Hon. Linda Frum: Honourable senators, as I rise today, I note condemn the brutal regime that has seen fit to take them hostage. that it has been almost exactly one month to this day since the Senate of Canada conducted its inquiry into the plight of innocently detained political prisoners in Iran. Today, I wish to remind us all that holding Iran accountable for PAUL G. KITCHEN its flagrant abuses of human rights cannot solely take place during a two-day inquiry, or even an annual Iran Accountability Week; it ROTHESAY NETHERWOOD SCHOOL— must take place every single day, because, sadly, there is great CONGRATULATIONS ON RETIREMENT cause for vigilance on this matter.
    [Show full text]
  • SFU Thesis Template Files
    The Right to Authentic Political Communication by Ann Elizabeth Rees M.A., Simon Fraser University, 2005 B.A., Simon Fraser University, 1980 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Communication Faculty of Arts and Social Science Ann Elizabeth Rees 2016 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Spring 2016 Approval Name: Ann Elizabeth Rees Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Title: The Right to Authentic Political Communication Examining Committee: Chair: Katherine Reilly, Assistant Professor Peter Anderson Senior Supervisor Associate Professor Catherine Murray Supervisor Professor Alison Beale Supervisor Professor Andrew Heard Internal Examiner Associate Professor Political Science Department Paul Thomas External Examiner Professor Emeritus Department of Political Studies University of Manitoba Date Defended/Approved: January 22, 2016 ii Abstract Increasingly, governments communicate strategically with the public for political advantage, seeking as Christopher Hood describes it to “avoid blame” and “claim credit” for the actions and decisions of governance. In particular, Strategic Political Communication (SPC) is becoming the dominant form of political communication between Canada’s executive branch of government and the public, both during elections and as part of a “permanent campaign” to gain and maintain public support as means to political power. This dissertation argues that SPC techniques interfere with the public’s ability to know how they are governed, and therefore undermines the central right of citizens in a democracy to legitimate elected representation by scrutinizing government and holding it to account. Realization of that right depends on an authentic political communication process that provides citizens with an understanding of government. By seeking to hide or downplay blameworthy actions, SPC undermines the legitimation role public discourse plays in a democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Subject-Matter of Those Elements Contained in Part 5 of Bill C-74
    MAY 2018 THE SUBJECT-MATTER OF THOSE ELEMENTS CONTAINED IN PART 5 OF BILL C-74: AN ACT TO IMPLEMENT CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE BUDGET TABLED IN PARLIAMENT ON FEBRUARY 27, 2018 AND OTHER MEASURES Report of the Standing Senate Committee on Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources The Honourable Rosa Galvez, Chair The Honourable Michael L. MacDonald, Deputy Chair For more information please contact us: by email: [email protected] by mail: The Standing Senate Committee on Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources Senate, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0A4 This report can be downloaded at: www.senate-senat.ca/enev The Senate is on Twitter: @SenateCA, follow the committee using the hashtag #ENEV Ce rapport est également offert en français THE SUBJECT-MATTER OF THOSE ELEMENTS CONTAINED IN PART 5 OF BILL C-74 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP ................................................................... 5 ORDER OF REFERENCE .............................................................................. 6 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................ 9 THE GREENHOUSE GAS POLLUTION PRICING ACT: DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION .................................................................................... 9 GENERAL DISCUSSION FROM WITNESSES ................................................ 12 A. Carbon Pricing as an Economic Instrument ...................................... 12 B. Competitiveness ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fair Tax Summit BUILDING a BETTER CANADA
    Fair Tax Summit BUILDING A BETTER CANADA Speakers Biographies Note: Publications or organizations that are underlined are hyperlinked. Brigitte Alepin Brigitte Alepin is a chartered accountant and a tax specialist. After practicing in the taxation field for 15 years, Brigitte specialized in tax policies at Harvard. She is recognized for her studies in tax equity, tax havens, energy and environmental taxation. The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants have invited her to present the findings of major studies to governments, and she often appears as an expert witness before House of Commons finance committees. She is a lecturer on taxation and tax policy at the Université du Québec, a frequent media commentator, a regular contributor to CA Magazine (the journal of Chartered Accountants of Canada) and she was also a columnist at the Journal de Montréal. She wrote 3 books about tax policies: Bill Gates, pay your fair share of taxes...like we do! (April 2012), La crise fiscal qui vient (2011), Ces riches qui ne paient pas d’impôts (2004). Sarah Anderson Sarah Anderson is Director of Global Economy with the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington DC. Her current work includes research, writing, and networking on issues related to the impact of international trade, finance, and investment policies on inequality, sustainability, and human rights. Sarah is a well-known expert on executive compensation, and has co-authored several books. Sarah has also been a consultant to the U.S. Agency for International Development (1989-1992) and an editor for the Deutsche Presse-Agentur (1988). She holds a Masters in International Affairs from The American University and a BA in Journalism from Northwestern University.
    [Show full text]
  • Docket 119 Synthesis Iof Comments on the Review.Pdf
    i ii Synthesis of Public Comment on the Forthcoming Review by the Federal Governments of Canada and the United States of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement A Report to the Governments of the United States and Canada January 2006 The views expressed in this synthesis are those of the individuals and organizations who participated in the public comment process. They are not the views of the International Joint Commission. INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION JOINT MIXTE COMMISSION INTERNATIONALE Canada and United States Canada et États-Unis INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION JOINT MIXTE COMMISSION INTERNATIONALE Canada and United States Canada et États-Unis Herb Gray Dennis Schornack Chair, Canadian Section Chair, United States Section Robert Gourd Irene Brooks Commissioner Commissioner Jack Blaney Allen Olson Commissioner Commissioner International Joint Commission Offices Canadian Section United States Section 234 Laurier Ave. West, 22nd Floor 1250 23rd Street, NW, Suite 100 Ottawa, ON K1P 6K6 Washington, D.C. 20440 Phone: (613) 995-2984 Phone: (202) 736-9000 Fax: (613) 993-5583 Fax: (202) 467-0746 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Great Lakes Regional Office 100 Ouellette Avenue, 8th Floor Windsor, ON N9A 6T3 or P.O. Box 32869, Detroit, MI 48232 Phone: (519) 257-6700 or (313) 226-2170 Fax: (519) 257-6740 Email: [email protected] Acknowledgements The International Joint Commission thanks the people from the Great Lakes, the St. Lawrence River and beyond who took part in the public comment process and whose voices are echoed in this report. ISBN 1-894280-60-1 This report is available online at www.ijc.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Associations' Activities and Expenditures
    PARLIAMENTARY ASSOCIATIONS’ ACTIVITIES AND EXPENDITURES FROM APRIL 1, 2018 TO MARCH 31, 2019 JOINT INTERPARLIAMENTARY COUNCIL REPORT Co-Chairs Hon. Donald Neil Plett, Senator 42nd Parliament, First Session Bruce Stanton, M.P. June 2019 June 2019 JOINT INTERPARLIAMENTARY COUNCIL CO-CHAIRS Hon. Donald Neil Plett, Senator Bruce Stanton, M.P. MEMBERS Hon. Dennis Dawson, Senator Hon. Wayne Easter, P.C., M.P. Hon. Marc Gold, Senator Hon. Mark Holland P.C., M.P. Jenny Kwan, M.P. Scott Simms, M.P. John Brassard, M.P. Linda Lapointe, M.P. CLERK OF THE COUNCIL Colette Labrecque-Riel June 2019 Table of Contents Section I: Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Parliamentary Associations and Interparliamentary Groups ................................................................................ 2 Joint Interparliamentary Council ........................................................................................................................... 4 Supporting Parliamentary Associations ................................................................................................................. 4 Section II: 2018-2019 Activities and Expenditures – Overview ......................................................................... 5 Section III: Activities and Expenditures by Parliamentary Association ............................................................ 12 Canada-Africa Parliamentary Association (CAAF)...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]