DOCSLIB.ORG

Elmbridge Borough Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Elmbridge Borough Council Elmbridge Borough Council Electoral Review – Council Size Submission to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England Elmbridge Borough Council Civic Centre High Street Esher Surrey KT10 9SD Any queries please contact: Ms B. Greenstein, Head of Executive & Member Services e-mail: [email protected] INDEX 1. INTRODUCTION Page 3 2. RATIONALE FOR ELECTORAL REVIEW Page 5 3. THE BOROUGH OF ELMBRIDGE Page 12 4. POLITICAL COMPOSITION AND WARD MEMBERS Page 18 5. GOVERNANCE AND DECISION MAKING Page 19 6. SCRUTINY FUNCTION Page 28 7. MEMBER DEVELOPMENT Page 33 8. THE WORKLOAD OF COUNCILLORS Page 45 9. SUBMISSION RECOMMENDATION Page 50 APPENDICES APPENDIX A Elmbridge Borough Council Election of Borough Councillors – 22 May 2014 Official Results of Poll APPENDIX B Electorate Breakdown per Ward APPENDIX C Political Composition of the Council APPENDIX D Elmbridge Borough Council’s Formal Decision Making Structure - 1 - APPENDIX E Responsibility for Cabinet Functions Exercised by Individual Cabinet Members as set out under Part 3 – Responsibility for Functions of the Council’s Constitution APPENDIX F Elmbridge Borough Council Schedule of Meetings 2014/15 APPENDIX G Record of Attendance of Councillors at meetings of the Council, Cabinet, Committees, Sub-Committees etc. during the 2013/14, 2012/13, 2011/12, 2010/11 and 2009/10 Municipal Years APPENDIX H The Council’s Senior Management Structure APPENDIX I Scheme of Officer Delegations as set out under Part 3 – Responsibility for Functions of the Council’s Constitution APPENDIX J List of the Outside Bodies to which the Council Appoints Nominative Representatives APPENDIX K Members' Allowances Scheme – 2014/15 APPENDIX L Overview & Scrutiny Protocol: Ancillary Groups APPENDIX M Overview and Scrutiny Work Programme 2014/15 APPENDIX N Minute Extracts from the Constitutional Review Member Working Group meetings held on 12 September 2013, 4 March 2014 and 10 September 2014 - 2 - 1. INTRODUCTION Elmbridge Borough Council made a formal application for an Electoral Review to be undertaken by the Local Government Boundary Commission for England within the Electoral Review Programme for 2014/15, in order to consider reducing the number of Members of the Council. This formal request was agreed at a Meeting of the Council on 10 April 2013. The related Minute extract is set out below: ‘RESOLVED that the Council’s request for an electoral review to be undertaken by the Local Government Boundary Commission for England be confirmed, in order to consider reducing the number of Members of the Council; and (a) a formal application be made to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England for inclusion in the Electoral Review Programme for 2014/15, and that a business case be developed for submission, detailing the number of councillors that the Council considered to be appropriate; (b) it be noted that whilst the Local Government Boundary Commission for England had not yet formalised the Electoral Review Timetable for 2014/15, should the Council be accepted within this Programme, it would be likely that any outcomes would be implemented by way of the Council elections in May 2016; and (c) an Electoral Review Member Working Group be constituted with 7 Members (4 Conservative, 2 Residents’ Associations and 1 Liberal Democrat), in order to consider the development of the Council’s business case, for approval by the Cabinet prior to formal submission to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England.’ The Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE) has since confirmed that the Council has been formally included in its Electoral Review Programme for 2014/15. The Council constituted a cross party Electoral Review Member Working Group in order to consider the development of the Council’s Business Case, including detailing the number of councillors that the Council considers to be appropriate, for approval by Cabinet prior to formal submission to the Boundary Commission. The Working Group was constituted with 7 Members (4 Conservative, 2 Residents’ Associations and 1 Liberal Democrat). The Cabinet had previously suggested that a reduction in number from 60 to 48 councillors would be appropriate (Cabinet meeting held on 21 March 2012). This figure was considered to reflect the significant reduction in Council provided services as a result of changes such as the transfer of the Council’s highways responsibilities and housing stock and a reduction in the Council’s workforce over recent years. The - 3 - Council no longer owns a supply of housing, having undertaken a stock transfer to the Elmbridge Housing Trust in 2000. Representatives from the LGBCE met all Group Leaders and gave a presentation that was open to all Members of the Council on Monday 1 September 2014 at the Civic Centre to outline the review process and answer any questions from Members. The Council currently has 60 councillors who represent 22 wards across the Borough (population 131,500). Each ward is represented by either two or three councillors and each councillor is elected for a four-year term of office. The Council’s current electoral cycle has elections by thirds, whereby every three out of four years, a third of councillors stand for election / re-election. The Council has taken the opportunity to consider a possible move to whole council elections, which would enable greater flexibility of ward configuration in the future. If approved, the earliest date to hold whole council elections would be May 2016. Following a public consultation on the Council’s electoral cycle, a Special Meeting of the Council was held on Monday 17 November 2014 where the motion to adopt an electoral cycle of whole council elections every four years was not carried. Accordingly, the Council will retain the current arrangements of Borough Elections by thirds. In accordance with the Council’s resolution on 10 April 2013, this document was considered by the Cabinet on 19 November 2014 and recommended for approval to the Meeting of the Council on 3 December 2014 where, following a full debate and recorded vote of 33 votes in favour, 18 votes against and 5 abstentions, it was formally agreed as the Council’s Size Submission. Accordingly, the Council’s Size Submission is submitted to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England for consideration. - 4 - 2. RATIONALE FOR ELECTORAL REVIEW This submission sets out the Council’s proposal to seek a reduction in the number of Borough Councillors from 60 to 48, representing a reduction of 20%. In reaching this proposal, the following factors have been taken into account and supporting documentation is included in this submission: Changes to the Council’s service responsibilities Up until the year 2000, the Council was responsible for the direct provision of housing in the Borough before the housing stock was transferred to a social landlord. The Council spent approximately £18million on maintaining the houses and running the service (and collected broadly the same in rent and Government grants). Following the transfer of its housing stock in 2000, the Council’s related service responsibilities were significantly reduced although the Council maintains housing responsibilities such as maintaining the Housing Register, homelessness and affordable housing activities. This significant change in service responsibility has occurred since the last Electoral Review in 1999. The Council previously ran a ‘Direct Services Organisation’ for services such as refuse collection and since 1990, the refuse collection service has been externalised. In addition, the Council maintained the highways on behalf of Surrey County Council at a cost of approximately £3million (£2.5million of which was reimbursed by Surrey County Council). Since the year 2000, Surrey County Council has undertaken the provision of the Highways function. This significant change in service responsibility has occurred since the last Electoral Review in 1999. Whilst it is recognised that there have been some additional Council responsibilities, such as alcohol, gambling and Taxi licensing, there has been an overall reduction in the Council’s workforce since the year 2000, reflecting these changes in the Council’s service responsibilities. In 1999/2000 the Council employed 401 full time equivalent (FTE) staff. In 2003/04, the number of FTE staff was 360 and has further reduced to 320 FTE as at September 2014. (All three comparator figures do not include fixed term contracts, as historic data in this regard is not available.) The Council has sought to make the difficult decisions between competing priorities and to help mitigate the effects of cuts across the public sector whilst maintaining high quality service delivery for residents. The changing way in which residents access information and services Since the last Electoral Review in 1999, the Council has invested in ‘electronic’ government to enable residents to access services of the Council through its website and to communicate with the Council effectively by email / on line. This form of access - 5 - has dramatically increased in recent years where residents increasingly ‘self-serve’ from the website, reducing the need for individuals to approach Councillors directly. Clearly, Members continue to engage with residents in a variety of ways, including e- mail, websites, Member Web Pages and by way of social media. The Council has a shared integrated reception with Surrey County Council and Surrey Police. Telephone calls to the Authority are handled through an integrated customer
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1994 Appendices
    APPENDICES Footnotes I Chronology of Evolving Architecture/Design II List of Consultees III Principal Issues Raised by Consultations IV Principal Contacts V Summary List of Strategic Policies VI List of Illustrations VII APPENDIX I: FOOTNOTES 1 London Planning Advisory Committee : 1993 Draft Advice on Strategic Planning Guidance for London (para. 8.14) 2 Royal Fine Art Commission: Thames Connections Exhibition (May 1991) 3 Judy Hillman: A New Look for London (Royal Fine Art Commission 1988) ISBN 0 11 752135 3 4 Kim Wilkie Environmental Design: Landscape Strategy for the Thames between Hampton Court and Kew: Elements for the Project Brief (July 1992) Kim Wilkie Environmental Design: Report on Consultation (July 1992) 5 Sherban Cantacuzino Eddington Charitable Trust Johnny Van Haeften Mick Jagger Richard Lester Prince and Princess Rupert Loewenstein 6 David Lowenthal: The Historic Landscape Reconsidered (George Washington Univ. 1990) 7 English Nature: Strategy for the 1990s: Natural Areas (1993) 8 Richmond Council demolition of Devonshire Lodge at the foot of Richmond Hill in 1960s 9 Countryside Commission, English Heritage, English Nature: Conservation Issues in Strategic Plans (August 1993) ISBN 0 86170 383 9 10 Greater London Council, Department of Transportation and Development: Thames-side Guidelines, An Environmental Handbook for London’s River (March 1986) 11 London Ecology Unit A Nature Conservation Strategy for London (Ecology Handbook 4) Nature Conservation in Hounslow (Ecology Handbook 15) 1990 Nature Conservation in Kingston
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Opinion
    SCOPING OPINION: Proposed M25 Junction 10/A3 Wisley Interchange Improvement Case Reference: TR010030 Adopted by the Planning Inspectorate (on behalf of the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government) pursuant to Regulation 10 of The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 January 2018 [This page has been intentionally left blank] 2 Scoping Opinion for M25 Junction 10/A3 Wisley Interchange CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 5 1.1 Background ................................................................................. 5 1.2 The Planning Inspectorate’s Consultation ........................................ 7 1.3 Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union ..................................... 7 2. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT .......................................................... 8 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................ 8 2.2 Description of the Proposed Development ....................................... 8 2.3 The Planning Inspectorate’s Comments ........................................... 9 3. EIA APPROACH ................................................................................ 13 3.1 Introduction .............................................................................. 13 3.2 Relevant National Policy Statements (NPSs) .................................. 13 3.3 Scope of Assessment .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Helping You Grow Your Income
    Funding Guide Helping you grow your income (Last updated April 2015) (Last updated February 2012) 1 Contents Left click on the links below (underlined), to be directed to the section. Local funding (funding in your area only) Elmbridge Epsom and Ewell Guildford Mole Valley Reigate and Banstead Runnymede Spelthorne Surrey Heath Tandridge Waverley Woking List of Local Funding Officers Funding for facility development Funding for youth led projects Funding for projects supporting disadvantaged young people Funding for registered charities only Funding for coaches (individuals) Funding for talented athletes (individuals) Other funding types For support in your local area, please visit the local funding section of this resource (links above) Support: Additional information can be accessed from the following websites: www.activesurrey.com (Funding Guide and useful contacts) www.fundingcentral.org.uk (guide to over 4000 grants, contacts and loans) www.runningsports.org (guide on funding and promoting your club) 2 (1) Local funding (by local authority) (a) Elmbridge (i) Elmbridge Sports Council The Elmbridge Sports Council (ESC) aims to promote sport throughout the Borough of Elmbridge, encourage youth participation in sport and assist, as much as possible, all clubs, societies, schools, colleges and sporting individuals in their quest for sporting success and participation. It is an independent body, administered by Elmbridge Borough Council. Grant Aid is available once a year for sports clubs and individuals in Elmbridge to assist with their various sporting pursuits. A total fund of £10,000 is provided by Elmbridge Borough Council for this purpose. Timescales: Applications for grant aid are invited between February and April each year.
    [Show full text]
  • 10550 the London Gazette, 14Th June 1990
    10550 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 14TH JUNE 1990 A copy of the Order may be inspected during normal office hours When this Order comes into effect it will be unlawful, subject to at the undermentioned address, the Area Office, Maison Dieu certain exceptions, to leave a vehicle at any time in: Gardens, Dover, or the Highways and Transportation Department, Effingham Road, Long Ditton, both sides from a point Kent County Council, Springfield, Maidstone. approximately 60 metres (66 yards) south-west of Windmill The Order will become operative on 1st July 1990. Lane to a point approximately 64 metres (70 yards) north-east L. Cumberland. Director of Law Property and Administration. of Windmill Lane. Council Offices, Honeywood Road, Windmill Lane, Long Ditton, both sides, from a point Whitfield, Dover, Kent CTI6 3PE. approximately 20 metres (22 yards) north-west of Effingham 14th June 1990. (769) Road to a point approximately 20 metres south-east of Effingham Road. The additional restrictions will be subject to the various DOVER DISTRICT COUNCIL exceptions contained in the Order of 1967. Copies of the draft Order, the Order of 1967, maps showing the The Dover District Council (Off-Street Parking Places) (1976) restricted roads and a statement of the Council's reasons for (Amendment No. 2) Order 1990 proposing to make the Order may be examined at: Notice is hereby given that the Dover District Council, with the The Town Hall, New Zealand Avenue, Walton-on-Thames, consent of the Kent County Council, intend to make an Order under Monday to Friday, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSING NEED Be Doing All It Can to Meet That Need in Full
    Government guidance states that the OAHN figure should be unbiased and that the Local Plan should HOUSING NEED be doing all it can to meet that need in full. However, it should not be treated as a target as it A key role of the Local Plan for Epsom & Ewell is does not take into account any local constraints to to establish the overall requirement for housing development such as market capacity or over the plan period and identify enough land for environmental designations. development to meet this requirement. HOW MANY NEW HOMES ARE NEEDED? This is done by gathering a sound collection of For Epsom & Ewell, the SHMA confirmed that evidence that provides information about the there is an overwhelming need for market housing Borough’s future housing needs. A large amount of which totals 7100 new homes 2015- 2032. This information has been published nationally outlining figure equates to 418 new homes per year. More the need to build more homes. This information is detailed information on the figures are available on useful but the authority also undertakes extensive our website within the SHMA document local research to ensure policies and strategies meet local needs. The two main documents that The Government has recently published its own help to inform this process are the Strategic indicative calculation for each local authority in the Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) and the country. Their indicative figure has been Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment calculated using their own formula, which they are (SHLAA). proposing be introduced as a standard national methodology for calculating OAHN.
    [Show full text]
  • Surrey Strategic Partnership Plan 2010 - 2020
    Standing up for Surrey Surrey Strategic Partnership Plan 2010 - 2020 This document is available from www.surreycc.gov.uk/communityplanning If you would like more information on the Surrey Strategic Partnership to comment on the Community Strategy to know how you can get involved or contribute to some of the work described in this document Please contact us: Tel: 020 8541 7406 email: [email protected] If you would like this document in large print, on tape or in another language please contact us on: Tel: 03456 009 009 Fax: 020 8541 9004, Minicom: 020 8541 8914 email: [email protected] The Surrey Strategic Partnership produced this plan on behalf of Surrey’s public sector agencies, business, voluntary, community, and faith sectors. This plan fulfils the requirements of the Local Government Act 2000, which requires Surrey County Council to prepare a Sustainable Community Strategy with partners that demonstrates how local organisations and agencies will work together to improve the economic, social and environmental well-being of the county. Contents Contents Foreword by Dr Andrew Povey ................................................................................... 4 Part 1.............................................................................................................................. 6 Surrey in 2020 ............................................................................................................... 8 Five Key Challenges....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Elmbridge 2020 Air Quality Annual Status Report Final
    2020 Air Quality Annual Status Report (ASR) In fulfilment of Part IV of the Environment Act 1995 Local Air Quality Management June 2020 Elmbridge Borough Council Local Authority Paul Leadbeater Officer Department Environmental Services Elmbridge Borough Council Council Offices Address High Street Esher KT10 9SD Telephone 01372 474750 E-mail [email protected] Report Reference Stantec47763/ASR2020 number Date 2020 Elmbridge Borough Council Document Control Sheet Project Name: Elmbridge 2020 LAQM Project Ref: 47763/3005 Report Title: Air Quality Assessment Doc Ref: Issued Date: June 2020 Name Position Signature Date Prepared by: Laura Smart Air Quality Scientist Laura Smart May 2020 Reviewed by: Kiri Heal Senior Associate Kiri Heal May 2020 Environmental Approved by: Elaine Richmond Elaine Richmond May 2020 Director For and on behalf of Stantec UK Limited Revision Date Description Prepared Reviewed Approved Draft May 2020 Draft for client comment LS KH ER Issued June 2020 With comments included LS KH ER This report has been prepared by Stantec UK Limited (‘Stantec’) on behalf of its client to whom this report is addressed (‘Client’) in connection with the project described in this report and takes into account the Client's particular instructions and requirements. This report was prepared in accordance with the professional services appointment under which Stantec was appointed by its Client. This report is not intended for and should not be relied on by any third party (i.e. parties other than the Client). Stantec accepts no duty or responsibility (including in negligence) to any party other than the Client and disclaims all liability of any nature whatsoever to any such party in respect of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Prioritisation for the Location of Offers of Temporary Accommodation Under S188 And/Or S193 Housing Act 1996): January 2013
    Annex 1 (In Borough Temporary Accommodation Policy) Guidelines for prioritisation for the location of offers of Temporary Accommodation under s188 and/or s193 Housing Act 1996): January 2013 The Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames is committed to securing suitable temporary accommodation for homeless households where this is required under S188 or S193 of the Housing Act. The Council’s aim is to provide accommodation within Kingston Borough wherever possible, but unfortunately this is not always achievable. The Council is dependant on the supply of accommodation that is available, and ongoing welfare benefit changes mean that for some households, accommodation in Kingston Borough will not be affordable. As a result, there will be an increasing need to use accommodation that may be at a distance from Kingston, and a process needs to be in place to ensure that the Council prioritise those who have the greatest need to be in or close to a particular location. Where a household needs to be moved away from a particular location for safety reasons, this will always be taken into account when deciding on temporary accommodation allocation. In assessing the allocation the Council will consider whether the applicant can afford the housing without being deprived of basic essentials such as food, clothing, heating, transport and any other specific essentials a household may have; and in so doing will take account of costs resulting from the location of the accommodation. It should be noted that these are guidelines only and the individual circumstances of each case including the time likely to be spent in the accommodation must always be taken into account when determining the suitability of an offer of Temporary Accommodation.
    [Show full text]
  • Wealth of the Nation Report 2019
    WEALTH OF THE NATION CONTENTS Introduction: How CACI data reveals the wealth of the nation ................................ 4 Household Incomes ..................................................................................................... 8 Housing Affordability .................................................................................................. 12 The Savings Market .....................................................................................................20 Summary .....................................................................................................................26 Appendix ..................................................................................................................... 28 At CACI we’ve worked with clients to analyse customers and catchments on a daily basis over the past 40 years. Whether you need to benchmark postcodes, neighbourhoods or catchments, CACI’s Data solutions define the industry standard; every dataset is built, maintained and updated by a dedicated team of expert analysts ensuring you have a robust source of independent analysis to corroborate your decisions and support your strategy. HOW CACI DATA REVEALS THE WEALTH OF THE NATION Every year, CACI releases Paycheck, an estimate of the income and outgoings of households across the UK. Our data shows the average and modelled distribution of household incomes and essential outgoings for the 1.5 million residential postcodes in the UK. We’ve analysed the latest Paycheck data to reveal the state of the nation’s
    [Show full text]
  • Jubilee Meadows Walton-On-Thames Kt12 Jubilee Meadows Jubilee Jubilee Meadows
    JUBILEE MEADOWS WALTON-ON-THAMES KT12 JUBILEE MEADOWS JUBILEE MEADOWS 02 Computer generated image of Hamilton House at Jubilee Meadows is indicative only 03 DESIRABLE ADDRESS Set in former school grounds and part of 296 homes Space to entertain in your new home at Jubilee Meadows comprising of 1 and 2 bedroom apartments and 2 to 4 bedroom homes, Jubilee Meadows presents an exciting opportunity for savvy first time buyers to step onto the property ladder. This collection of 45 shared ownership apartments gets full marks for its location in Walton-on-Thames. The welcoming town offers its residents the very best of out of town living: a picturesque riverside setting and a thriving community spirit. Nearby are plenty of green spaces, top-class eateries and historical places of interest, while London is also within easy reach. A stone’s throw from both Hersham and Walton train stations, and minutes from the JUBILEE MEADOWS JUBILEE bustling town centre, the red brick buildings feature modern 1 and 2 bedroom apartments with carefully thought through interiors made up of spacious bedrooms, clean lined bathrooms and open plan kitchen and living areas. JUBILEE MEADOWS JUBILEE Photography of previous FABRICA showhome is indicative only 04 05 JUBILEE MEADOWS JUBILEE JUBILEE MEADOWS JUBILEE Walton-on-Thames riverside 06 07 01 02 VIBRANT LIVING Boasting a sought-after Surrey postcode, 01. Walton Bridge, Walton-on-Thames 02. Stop off for lunch in one of this attractive new build development is moments the nearby restaurants in from Walton-on-Thames’s vibrant core, where high Hampton Court street shops and romantic restaurants sit next 03.
    [Show full text]
  • Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study: Final Report | January 2019 Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study Final Report
    Elmbridge Borough Council Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study: Final Report | January 2019 Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study Final Report Ove Arup & Partners Ltd 13 Fitzroy Street, London, W1T 4BQ, United Kingdom www.arup.com Elmbridge Borough Council Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study: Final Report | January 2019 Document Verification Job title Landscape Sensitivity and Strategic Views Study Job number 263905-00 Document title Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study: Final Report File reference Document ref Revision Date Filename Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study-Final Report Final 30/01/19 Description Draft issue Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Christopher Wright Andrew Tempany Tom Armour Signature Revision Date Filename Description Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Signature This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 263905-00 Elmbridge Borough Council Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study: Final Report | January 2019 Contents Page 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Landscape Assessment Methodology 5 3.0 Landscape Sensitivity Study Summary Findings 17 4.0 Landscape Sensitivity Study Analysis and Recommendations 25 5.0 Appendices 177 Elmbridge Borough Council Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study: Final Report | January 2019 1.0 Introduction Scope and purpose of the Landscape What
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 4^ 7 LOCAL GOTEEDMHT BOUNDARY OOJMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO. ^" 3 7 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNMHY COMMISSIOH FOR ENGLAND CHAIBMAH Mr G J Ellerton CMS MBE IEPTJTT CHATRMAN Sir Wilfred Burns CB CBE MEMBERS Lftdj Ackner Mr T BrockUnk DL Mr D P Harrison Professor G E Cherry T3I1 3T. HCS. PATRICK J2KKIN UP SECRETARY OF STATE ?03 THE EKVI30KK2IT *. In their parish review report subnitted to us on 16 June iV80f Guildford Borough Council suggested changes to parts of ths boundary between the Borough, of Cuildford ?.r.d the Boroughs of Surrey Heath, Poking and Elmbridge, and Districts of Hole Valley and T7averley in the Coi-nty of Surrey, and the Borough of 3ushmoor in the County of Hacipahire in the following parishad and unparished areas:- Ash Parish, Guildford/Surrey Heath Borough Pirbright Parish, Guildford/Surroy Eeath Borough Pirbright Parish, Guildi'ord/tfokinc Borough Ockha-n Parisii, Guildfcrd/Elcbridge Borough Effin^haa Parish, Guildford/r.role Valley District East I'.orsley Parish, Guildford/Abinger Parish, Kole Valley Shere Parish, Guildford/Abinter Parish, Hole Valley Shere Parish, Guildford/Ev/hurst Parish, Vfaverley District Albury Parish, Cuildford/V.'onersh Parish, V/averley r:halfor;l parish, Guildford/Bcamley Parish, TTaverley Shalford Parish, Guildford/Godalming Parish, 77averley Coinpton Parish, Guildford/Godalmir.g Parish, '.V-: verley Shackleford Parish, Guildford/Goclaiming Parish, i7a*/erley ShaclQeford Parish, Guildford/Witley Parish, ";7averley Seale and Tongham Parish, Guildford/Elstead Parisl;, /teverley Seale and Toafjham Parish, GuildTord/Tilford Parish, VTaverley Seale and Tonghaa Parish, Guildford/7averley District Ash Parish, Guilclford, Surrey/Rushooor Borough, Eaapshlre ^ ;2.
    [Show full text]