DOCSLIB.ORG

Pawtucket Street Over the Pawtucket Canal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pawtucket Street Over the Pawtucket Canal SUMMARY OF FINDINGS REPORT PAWTUCKET STREET OVER PAWTUCKET CANAL BRIDGE NO. L-15-050 (87K) LOWELL, MA CONTRACT NO. 84000630096 CO NO. 1 BOOTT BRIDGE INSPECTIONS AND LOAD RATING SERVICES MAY 11, 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder All Rights Reserved ONLY THE CLIENT OR ITS DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES MAY USE THIS DOCUMENT AND ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT FOR WHICH THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED. Project #20152059.002 © 2015 Kleinfelder A Report Prepared for: Mr. Randald Bartlett, P.E. Northeast Operations Manager Enel Green Power North America, Inc. One Tech Drive, Suite 220 Andover, MA 01810 Reference: Contract No. 84000630096 CO No. 1 Boott Bridge Inspections and Load Rating Services SUMMARY OF FINDINGS REPORT PAWTUCKET STREET OVER PAWTUCKET CANAL BRIDGE NO. L-15-050(87K) LOWELL, MA Prepared by: Reviewed by: Michael T. Sullivan, P.E. Douglas Peterson, P.E. Structural Project Engineer Principal Engineer Matthew Steele Project Manager KLEINFELDER 215 First Street, Suite 320 Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617.498.7800 Fax: 617.498.4630 May 11, 2015 Project #20152059.002 Page i of ii May 11, 2015 © 2015 Kleinfelder TABLE OF CONTENTS ____________________________________________________________________________ Section Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................. 1 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................ 3 2.1 ROADWAY...................................................................................................... 3 2.2 SUPERSTRUCTURE ...................................................................................... 4 2.2.1 Beams ................................................................................................. 4 2.2.2 Deck .................................................................................................... 5 2.3 SUBSTRUCTURE ........................................................................................... 5 2.3.1 Abutments ............................................................................................ 5 2.3.2 Pier ...................................................................................................... 6 2.4 UTILITIES ....................................................................................................... 6 2.5 HISTORIC CONSIDERATIONS ....................................................................... 6 3 EVALUATIONS AND CONSIDERATIONS .................................................................. 8 3.1 SUPERSTRUCTURE ALTERNATIVES ............................................................ 8 3.1.1 Alternative 1 – Welded Steel Plate Girders ............................................ 8 3.1.2 Alternative 2 – Concrete NEBT’s ........................................................... 9 3.1.3 Alternative 3 – Steel Box Beams ........................................................... 9 3.1.4 Alternative 4 – Adjacent Prestressed Concrete Box Beams .................... 9 3.2 GEOTECHNICAL ............................................................................................ 9 3.3 HYDRAULIC ................................................................................................. 10 3.4 SURVEY ....................................................................................................... 10 3.5 PERMITTING ................................................................................................ 10 4 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................. 12 4.1 ROADWAY.................................................................................................... 12 4.2 SUPERSTRUCTURE .................................................................................... 12 4.3 SUBSTRUCTURE ......................................................................................... 13 4.3.1 Abutments .......................................................................................... 13 4.3.2 Pier .................................................................................................... 13 4.4 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS .......................................................... 14 APPENDICES A Structure Appraisal & Inventory Form Dated April 22, 2015 B 2014 Routine Inspection Report C Preliminary Design and Construction Schedule D Figures: 1 – Existing Aerial Plan 2 – Existing Bridge Cross Section 3 – Proposed Bridge Cross Section E Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Project #20152059.002 Page ii of ii May 11, 2015 © 2015 Kleinfelder SUMMARY OF FINDINGS REPORT PAWTUCKET STREET OVER PAWTUCKET CANAL BRIDGE NO. L-15-050 (87K) LOWELL, MA 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ____________________________________________________________________________ Kleinfelder was retained by Enel Green Power North America to examine the existing conditions of Bridge No. L-15-050 (87K) which carries Pawtucket Street over the Pawtucket Canal in the City of Lowell, Massachusetts, prepare concept designs for replacing the bridge and provide a construction cost estimate for inclusion into a TIGER Grant application. The existing bridge is a two span structure primarily comprised of simply supported rolled steel stringers and a concrete cast-in-place deck. The bridge spans east to west and the water in the Pawtucket Canal beneath the bridge flows south. The Merrimack River is located directly north of the existing bridge and flows into the Pawtucket Canal. The first bridge at this location was constructed between 1793 and 1796. It was rebuilt in 1823, 1837, 1880 and 1927. The deck was replaced in 1948. The bridge has undergone numerous repairs and modifications including the addition of a reinforced concrete fascia/sidewalk beam on the north side of the structure in 2011. The bridge has an overall length of approximately 92 feet and an approximate out-to-out width of 46 feet. The condition of the Pawtucket Street Bridge has deteriorated to a point where the structure is currently posted for 6, 8, and 12 tons for the H20, Type 3, and Type 3S2 vehicles, respectively. Based on the 2014 Routine Inspection Report, located in Appendix B, the current condition rating of the deck, superstructure, and substructure are 5 (fair), 3 (serious), and 5 (fair), respectively. Based on our review of the existing conditions of the bridge, Kleinfelder recommends the structure be replaced in its entirety. We have considered and reviewed four (4) Superstructure Alternatives and recommend the new bridge consist of welded steel plate girders with a composite reinforced concrete deck founded on new abutments placed behind the existing canal wall abutments. The center masonry pier would not be reused in the new replacement structure. The depth of the new superstructure would go no deeper than the current bottom Project #20152059.002 Page 1 May 11, 2015 © 2015 Kleinfelder elevation of the existing bridge girders. A cross section of the existing bridge superstructure and proposed replacement superstructure is located in Appendix D. Kleinfelder recommends site data be collected before commencing any preliminary design of the replacement structure. A subsurface exploration program is needed to collect existing geotechnical information in order to determine substructure recommendations. A review of existing hydraulic data of the Pawtucket Canal is recommended to determine flooding and scour considerations beneath the structure and the need for a full hydraulic study. Finally, a complete survey should be prepared in order to determine the existing site layout and right of way information. A 20 inch water main located under the bridge and overhead utility lines will need to be addressed during design and their temporary and permanent relocation coordinated. The Pawtucket Canal is part of the Lowell Power Canal and Pawtucket Gatehouse National Register District (LPCPG) and is listed on the National Register. There are three historic overlay districts in the project area. The bridge’s presence within these districts and the use of U.S. Department of Transportation (US DOT) funds will result in coordination during the environmental permitting process. The use of federal funds to replace the bridge will also require compliance with agencies such as but not limited to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Coast Guard, the National Parks Service, The Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA), the Massachusetts Historic Commission (MHC) and the Lowell Conservation Commission. Local jurisdiction reviews will also be likely. We estimate a replacement structure to have a construction cost of approximately $3,400,000. This does not include planning, design and construction administration. In order to determine the cost estimate of a replacement structure, Kleinfelder assumed that new cantilever abutments founded on spread footings located behind the existing canal walls. A breakdown of the probable construction cost is located in Appendix E. Design of the replacement structure is expected to last 9 months from the Notice to Proceed (pending successful environmental permitting compliance, utility coordination and obtaining the required easements). The preliminary design and construction schedules are located in Appendix C. Project #20152059.002 Page 2 May 11, 2015 © 2015 Kleinfelder 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS ____________________________________________________________________________ Bridge No. L-15-050 (87K) carries Pawtucket Street
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kyan St OOC Extension Request
    The City of Lowell • Dept. of Planning and Development • Division of Development Services Lowell City Hall, Rm. 51 • 375 Merrimack Street • Lowell, MA 01852 P: 978.674.4144 • www.LowellMA.gov LAND USE BOARD: MAIN APPLICATION The following application is made to the City of Lowell Division of Development Services in accordance with the provisions of The Code of Ordinances, City of Lowell, Massachusetts, Chapter 270, Zoning Code. 1. Application Information Address of Property Location: _________________________________________________________________ Owner: _____________________________Telephone No. _________________Email: ___________ Address (if different) ________________________City: _____________State: ______Zip Code: ____________ Second Owner (if applicable): ________________ Telephone No. ________________Email: _____ Address (if different) ________________________City: _____________State: ______Zip Code: ____________ Applicant: (If different from Owner): ___________________________ Telephone No: ____________________ Email: ___________ ______Title (Tenant/Lessee/Purchaser/Etc.): _____________________________ Address _____________________________City: __________________State: ______Zip Code: _____________ Owner’s Agent (if applicable): ____________________________Telephone No. _________________________ Email: ___________ ______Title: (Attorney/Architect/Contractor/Etc.):________________________ Address _____________________________City: __________________State: ______Zip Code: _____________ 2. Please check all Board/Commission Approval(s)
    [Show full text]
  • Lowell, Massachusetts ) 3-27420 )
    COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS IN THE MATTER OF ) BROWNFIELDS COVENANT ) NOT TO SUE AGREEMENT TRINITY APPLETON FOUR LIMITED ) PARTNERSHIP AND TRIITY APPLETON ) LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ) REDEVELOPMENT OF ) MassDEP RTNs 3-26095 219,265 AND 307 JACKSON STREET, ) 3-26424 LOWELL, MASSACHUSETTS ) 3-27420 ) i. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE A. This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the Office of the Attorney General (the "OAG") on behalf of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (the "Commonwealth") and Trinity Appleton Four Limited Partnership and Trinity Appleton Limited Partnership (the "Trinity Entities"). Collectively, the OAG and the Trinity Entities are referred to as the "Parties." B. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to the Massachusetts Oil and Hazardous Material Release Prevention and Response Act, as amended and codified in Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 2lE ("G.L. c. 21E"), and the OAG's Brownfields Covenant Not to Sue Agreement Regulations at 940 CMR 23.00 ("Brownfields Covenant Regulations"), with reference to the Massachusetts Contingency Plan, 310 CMR 40.0000 (the "MCP"). This Agreement relates to the remediation of property now known as 219, 265 and 307 Jackson Street in the Hamilton Canal District of Lowell, Massachusetts more fully shown on the plan in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated by reference into this Agreement, which is recorded in Middlesex North Registry of Deeds in Plan Book 228, Page 127 (the "Property"). As more fully described and shown in Exhibit A, the Property contains parcels 6, 7, 8, 9 and portions of parcel 10 and Street D. Parcels 6 and 7 are owned by the Trinity Entities. Parcels 8, 9, 10 and Street Dare owned by the City of Lowell.
    [Show full text]
  • Towpath Topics Middlesex Canal Association P.O
    Towpath Topics Middlesex Canal Association P.O. Box 333 Billerica, MA 01821 www.middlesexcanal.org Volume 50 No. 3 March 2012 MCA ACTIVITIES Mark your calendars! A Middlesex Canal Bicycle Ride will be conducted on Sunday, April 1, along the length of the canal, from Middlesex Village on the north - south to Charlestown. The MCA-AMC Spring Walk will take place on Sunday, April 15, in North Billerica. The Annual Meeting will be held at the museum on Sunday, April 29, beginning at 1 PM. Nancy Lusignan Schultz, author of the book “Fire and Roses”, will be our speaker. There will also be an election of officers. See the Calendar, beginning on page 3, for more information on our activi- ties. Also included in the calendar are meetings and tours, sponsored by other organizations, in which you may want to participate. Please also check our web site periodically, at the URL noted above, which often lists canal-related events and topics of potential interest. PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE by J. Jeremiah Breen, President; [email protected] Now is a good time to walk the towpath of the historic Middlesex Canal. With the leaves fallen and the undergrowth withered, all the canal remnants found by Burt VerPlanck and published in his “Middlesex Canal Guide and Maps” are more visible. And if walkers this time of year still can’t find a sluice used to drawdown the canal into Content Brook or other remnant, Roger Hago- pian is available to answer questions. He walked the proof of the Guide after If you can say Welcome!, you can be a volunteer at the museum.
    [Show full text]
  • Gunderboom Technology & Projects Overview
    1050 Central Park Drive Sanford, FL 32771 Toll Free 888-345-2666 (BOOM) Tel 407-548-2200 Fax 407-548-2230 www.gunderboom.com Gunderboom Technology & Projects Overview Technology Overview Gunderboom, Inc. provides project specific, Engineered Aquatic Filter Barrier systems. The Gunderboom team designs barrier systems individually for each project that takes into consideration all the parameters of the site, project goals, physical site characteristics, “means and methods” and dynamic forces that will be transmitted into the barrier. That design is then fabricated in the Gunderboom facility under direct supervision of the design engineers. The Gunderboom fabrication facility was purpose built to assemble these special barrier systems so that the very high tensile strengths required can be achieved. It is not uncommon for connection/mooring point design loads, as an example, to reach 50,000 lbs and be 1.5” thick when all the elements are combined together (See Attachment A – GeoComposite Example). Typically, the Aquatic Filter Barrier can be described as a full depth, permeable barrier constructed of “GeoComposites” (either floating or fixed) that allows water to pass while retaining/excluding, from side to side, suspended sediments (including contaminated sediments or sediments that carry bacteria), fish/larvae/eggs or sound. In certain applications these barrier systems may be impermeable, or partially impermeable to accommodate differing strata within the water body. There are also some cases where the barriers have not been full water depth, again for site specific requirements. Marine Design & Construction * Commercial Diving * Technical Dredging * Salvage * Environmental Contracting 1050 Central Park Dr. ● Sanford, FL 32771 ● Toll Free 888-345-2666 (BOOM) ● Tel 407-548-2200 ● Fax 407-548-2230 Project Examples Marine Life Exclusion System (MLES™) Lovett Generating Station – Hudson River – New York Floating, full water depth, boom system to exclude all life stages, including fish eggs, down to 0.5 mm from 425,000 gpm cooling water intake system.
    [Show full text]
  • Siting of Renewable Energy Facilities Within the Montachusett and North
    SITING OF RENEWABLE ENERGY FACILITIES WITHIN THE MONTACHUSETT AND NORTHERN MIDDLESEX REGIONS Funded by: Prepared by the Montachusett Regional Planning Commission (MRPC) and the Northern Middlesex Council of Governments (NMCOG) October 2014 I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Expenditures for conventional energy and fuel costs provide little direct economic benefit for our regional economies. Utilization of renewable energy and improvements to energy efficiency has the ability to keep more of those dollars in our local communities and regional economy. This involves siting and promoting renewable energy facilities in appropriate locations, increasing reliance on renewable energy sources, and making these energy sources more practical and affordable. Renewables are not subject to fossil fuel price volatility, enabling residents to more efficiently deal with temperature extremes. Energy prices in a region with both high efficiency and renewable energy are likely to see less volatility and lower average power prices because price spikes will be reduced. However, at this time, there are insufficient siting standards for renewables. As a result, developers of renewable energy do not know what criteria they need to meet in order to develop wind, solar, geothermal, hydropower and other facilities. Renewable energy facilities also provide complementary economic development benefits by generating investment and employment in different sectors of the economy, which expands the total economic stimulus effect. Renewable energy also has a high job growth rate, reflected in efforts at Fitchburg State College, Mount Wachusett Community College, and University of Massachusetts - Lowell to educate and train people in the skill areas necessary to fuel the clean energy transition. This report was developed, in part, to serve as a template for other Regional Planning Agencies (RPAs) throughout the Commonwealth to promote renewable energy and enhance economic development in their regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Power in Lowell, Massachusetts
    WATER POWER IN LOWELL, MASSACHUSETTS prepared by Patrick M. Malone Assistant Professor of American Civilization & History Brown University and Larry D. Lankton Assistant Curator, Power & Shop Machinery The Henry Ford Museum Photographs by Lyn Van Buskirk submitted to the Field Investigation Presentation of Subcommittee on National Parks and Recreation of the House Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs April 26, 1974 Lowell, Massachusetts became America’s first great industrial city because of the power of the Merrimack River. The textile mills which brought pros­ perity to early Lowell depended on water power delivered by a complex system of canals. These man-made waterways were, and still are, an engineering marvel. They greatly affected the patterns of urban development in Lowell and earned the city its reputation as the "Venice of America." An 1821 map of' "Pawtucket in the town of Chelmsford" shows the rural area which would soon become the city of Lowell. Here the Concord River joins the Merrimack below the Pawtucket Falls. Lowell historian Henry Miles described the falls as "a descent of thirty-two feet— not perpendicular, but over several rapids, in circuitous channels, with a violent current amidst sharp- pointed r o c k s . In earlier times the Indians had fished at the falls, but by the late eighteenth century the rapids seriously interrupted the flow of goods, principally lumber, that came down the Merrimack to Newburyport on the coast. In 1792 a corporation known as the Proprietors of Locks and Canals on the Merrimack River was established with a plan to by-pass this natural obstacle.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan Update EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT
    City of Lowell Massachusetts Master Plan Update EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT Office of the City Manager Department of Planning and Development JFK Civic Center, 50 Arcand Drive Lowell, MA 01852 December, 2011 2 Existing Conditions Report | 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 THE COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN UPDATE ..................................................................................... 5 1.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS ......................................................................................................................... 7 1.3 REGIONAL CONTEXT ............................................................................................................................. 7 1.4 HISTORY ................................................................................................................................................ 7 2.0 DEMOGRAPHICS ...................................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 HISTORIC TRENDS ............................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 POPULATION & DENSITY ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of James B. Francis, Engineer​
    History The Legacy of James B. Francis, Engineer for the Proprietors of Locks and Canals (PLC); a very large company that built and managed the Not relying on ncut and try" textile industry in Lowell, Massachusetts, he methods, Francis brought a took Francis with him as his assistant. By that time, Francis had established himself scientific mind to bear on a as a skilled surveyor, draftsman and project variety of problems in manager. Also, Whistler appreciated his ability hydraulics and structural to work with people at all levels to get the job done. In his first job for Whistler, Francis built engineering. steam locomotives to provide transport for the textiles produced by the Lowell mills. To engi­ KATHERINE R. WEEKS neer the parts, he stripped down a locomotive imported from England and made detailed legend in New England's Merrimack drawings of all the parts. His staff members River Valley, James B. Francis was a created new parts from his drawings, using , A structural engineer, mechanical engi­ only chisels and files, and successfully recon­ neer, hydraulic engineer and a scientific con­ structed the locomotive. tributor in the fields of hydraulics and hydrol­ At the time, Lowell's canal system consisted ogy. His contributions of safe, efficient and · of the Pawtucket Canal and three subsidiary effective water power and mill structures were canals that served six textile .mills. During vital to the prosperity of the New England tex­ Francis' tenure as assistant to Whistler, three tile industry of the 1800s. more subsidiary canals were built to serve an­ other four mills.
    [Show full text]
  • Merrimack Canal
    Contents Articles Pawtucket Canal 1 Middlesex Canal 2 Lowell Power Canal System and Pawtucket Gatehouse 4 Merrimack Canal 6 References Article Sources and Contributors 7 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 8 Article Licenses License 9 Pawtucket Canal 1 Pawtucket Canal The Pawtucket Canal was finished in 1796. It was built to circumvent the Pawtucket Falls of the Merrimack River in East Chelmsford, Massachusetts (now Lowell, Massachusetts). It is a major component of the → Lowell canal system. The Pawtucket Falls are a mile long series of falls and rapids in which the Merrimack River drops 32 feet. The falls hampered the shipment of inland goods, mostly lumber, to the mouth of the Merrimack and Newburyport, Massachusetts. Newburyport was then one of the largest shipbuilding centers in New England, Pawtucket Canal in context and a steady supply of wood from New Hampshire was critical to its industry. The original canal was built by wealthy Boston merchants who formed a limited liability corporation called the Proprietors of Locks and Canals, one of the first of its kind in the United States. However, within a decade of its construction the → Middlesex Canal was completed, connecting the Merrimack directly with Boston, Massachusetts. Bringing goods directly to Boston was more advantageous for merchants, and the Pawtucket Canal fell out of favor for inland transport. The investors in the Boston Manufacturing Company having successfully built upon Francis Cabot Lowell and Paul Moody's work in builing a successfully integrated cotton mill at Waltham, Massachusetts on the Charles River were looking for a site that offered more waterpower and the Pawtucket Falls offered what they needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Lead Federal Agency: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FERC No
    Historically Significant Waterpower Equipment Study, Boott Hydropower, LLC, Lowell, Massachusetts Lead Federal Agency: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FERC No. 2790 Prepared for: HDR 1304 Buckley Road, Suite 202 Syracuse, New York 13212 Prepared by: Gray & Pape 60 Valley Street, Suite 103 Providence, Rhode Island 02909 20-60301.001 20-60301.001 Historically Significant Waterpower Equipment Study, Boott Hydropower, LLC, Lowell, Massachusetts Lead Agency: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FERC No. 2790 Prepared for: HDR 1304 Buckley Road, Suite 202 Syracuse, New York 13212 Prepared by: Patrick O’Bannon, Ph.D. Gray & Pape 60 Valley Street, Suite 103 Providence, Rhode Island 02909 ________________________________ Patrick O’Bannon Northeast Regional Manager February 19, 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................. i LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................... ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 HISTORIC BACKGROUND ................................................................................................. 2 3.0 STATUS AND SIGNIFICANCE ............................................................................................. 5 4.0 CONSULTATION WITH NPS..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lowell Locks and Canals Historic District
    Fori-". No* TIpSoO (Rev. 10-74) U NITED STATES DEPA RTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM DATE ENTEfiED SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ______TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS____________ NAME HISTORIC Lowell Locks and Canals Historic District_________________ AND/OR COMMON Lowell Locks' and Canals Historic District LOCATION STREETS NUMBER Between the Pawtucket and Hamilton Canals, the Concord River, and' the Merrimack River . _NOT FOR PUBLICATION 5 CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Lowell v — VICINITY OF STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Massachusptts 25 Middlesex 017 HCLASSIFI CATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE XJ6ISTRICT • _PUBLIC X-OCCUPIED — AGRICULTURE X_MUSEUM _BUILDING(S) —PRIVATE . , X.UNOCCUPIED X-COMMERCIAL —PARK _STRUCTURE X-BOTH —WORKINPROGRESb • X.EDUCATIONAL X^PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS X_YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC • X-BEING CONSIDERED _YES. UNRESTRICTED XJNDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION _NO —MILITARY —OTHER. (OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Multiple (See continuation sheet.) STREETS NUMBER . ' CITY. TOWN STATE ___ VICINITY OF LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDs.ETc. Northern Middlesex District Registry of Deeds STREETS. NUMBER Goreham Street CITY. TOWN STATE Lowell Mass, REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS American Engineering Record National Register of Historic Places DATE ; 1976 X FEDERAL X-STATE _CQUNTY _LDCAL DEPOSITORY
    [Show full text]
  • Middlesex Canal Facts
    Middlesex Canal Facts Owner: Middlesex Canal Company, one of the nation’s early Cargo transported: included stone, iron ore, staves, timber, stock companies. The company was incorporated in 1793 and boards, plank, wood, and shingles, in large quantities, that came dissolved in 1860. through the canal to Boston, as well as ashes, butter, cheese, beef, pork, cider, and grains. English goods, groceries, codfish, Dates of full operation: 1804 to 1851; sections of the canal mackerel, salt, lime, plaster and many other articles were opened earlier, as construction of them was completed, and there transported up the canal to the Merrimack River Valley. was some residual use after the canal was closed. Chief engineer: Colonel Loammi Baldwin, Sr., was the Length: 27¼ miles Supervisor of Construction. In this capacity, functionally, he was Northern terminus: on the Merrimack River at Middlesex chief engineer for the Middlesex Canal from its inception Village in Chelmsford, Massachusetts (now part of the city of through to completion, and for a short time thereafter. His son, Lowell) Loammi II, assisted and later became known as the father of civil engineering in the US. Southern terminus: Charlestown, Massachusetts, along the Charles River. History of the Middlesex Canal During the 1790s, soon after the end of the Revolutionary War, Type: towpath, with lift, guard and tidal locks American economic and political leaders became aware of the Width/depth: 30 feet/3.5 feet commercial and industrial advantages that man-made waterways brought to England and France, and wished to emulate their Locks: eventually, 18 lift locks, 2 extendable-length guard locks, success in the United States.
    [Show full text]