DOCSLIB.ORG

TEN-T Core Network Corridors the Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TEN-T Core Network Corridors the Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor ScanMed Study 2018‐2022 final, 19.11.2018 12th Corridor Forum Meeting TEN-T Core Network Corridors The Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor Presentation 12th Corridor Forum Meeting Brussels, 19.11.2018 Agenda of the 12th meeting of the Corridor Forum 1 Opening and Welcome (Pat Cox, European Coordinator) 2 Tour de table 3 Adoption of the Agenda and the Minutes of Meeting of the 11th Corridor Forum Meeting 4 3rd phase of the studies on TEN-T CNC & Support of CNC Coordinators (Contractor Consortium), followed by discussion 5 Reporting back from the Ideas Laboratories/working group meetings (Contractor Consortium) 6 First issues of the CNC study Coordinators (Contractor Consortium), followed by Questions & Answers 7 Information about the CEF 2 Regulation proposal 8 Reporting on CEF Call 2017 results, the 2018 and future potential Calls and the state of the play of CEF projects on the ScanMed Corridor (INEA contact person) 9 Presentation of selected projects on the ScanMed Corridor - Follo Line (by Banenor Project Director Per David Borenstein) - Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link (by Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link representative Jakob Vestergaard) - Brenner Base Tunnel (by BBT SE directors Konrad Bergmeister and Raffaele Zurlo) 10 Information on the Coordinators activities (European Coordinator), followed by Questions & Answers 11 Any other business 12 Conclusions / wrap-up (European Coordinator) End of the meeting, around 18:00 Date: 11 November 2018 2 © KombiConsult GmbH 1 ScanMed Study 2018‐2022 final, 19.11.2018 12th Corridor Forum Meeting Nine TEN-T Core Network Corridors Date: 18 April 2016 3 European Commission; http://ec.europa.eu/transport/infrastructure/tentec/tentec-portal/site/en/maps.html Information on the Coordinators’ activities / Meetings - past Date Place Subject 13-16.11.2017 Strasbourg TEN-T Coordinators Seminar, visit to the EP and investing to connect Europe conference 31.01.2018 Brussels TEN-T Coordinators Seminar with INEA 05.02.2018 Munich 1st Brenner Summit 12–14.02.2018 Malmö/Oslo Visit to Sweden and Norway 19-21.02.2018 Visit to Sicily and Calabria 22.02.2018 Innsbruck 2nd Scan-Med ideas laboratory cross-border rail/interoperability on the Brenner Corridor 26-27.04.2018 Ljubljana TEN-T Days 28-29.05.2018 Malmö Fehmarnbelt Days 12.06.2018 Bolzano 2nd Brenner Summit 13.06.2018 Innsbruck BCP plenary meeting 05.07.2018 Verona Brenner Intermodal Forum 15.11.2018 Vienna EESC clean mobility conference Date: 17 October 2017 © KombiConsult GmbH 2 ScanMed Study 2018‐2022 final, 19.11.2018 12th Corridor Forum Meeting Agenda of the 12th meeting of the Corridor Forum 1 Opening and Welcome (Pat Cox, European Coordinator) 2 Tour de table 3 Adoption of the Agenda and the Minutes of Meeting of the 11th Corridor Forum Meeting 4 3rd phase of the studies on TEN-T CNC & Support of CNC Coordinators (Contractor Consortium), followed by discussion 5 Reporting back from the Ideas Laboratories/working group meetings (Contractor Consortium) 6 First issues of the CNC study Coordinators (Contractor Consortium), followed by Questions & Answers 7 Information about the CEF 2 Regulation proposal 8 Reporting on CEF Call 2017 results, the 2018 and future potential Calls and the state of the play of CEF projects on the ScanMed Corridor (INEA contact person) 9 Presentation of selected projects on the ScanMed Corridor - Follo Line (by Banenor Project Director Per David Borenstein) - Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link (by Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link representative Jakob Vestergaard) - Brenner Base Tunnel (by BBT SE directors Konrad Bergmeister and Raffaele Zurlo) 10 Information on the Coordinators activities (European Coordinator), followed by Questions & Answers 11 Any other business 12 Conclusions / wrap-up (European Coordinator) End of the meeting, around 18:00 Date: 11 November 2018 6 Adoption of Minutes of Meeting of 11th Corridor Forum Meeting . Post Tropical Cyclone „Ophelia“ hits Ireland, with neither European Coordinator nor his Advisor to participate . Conclusion of the 2nd phase of the Corridor Studies (2015-2017) . Minutes of meeting circulated on 24 November 2017 Date: 11 November 2018 7 © KombiConsult GmbH 3 ScanMed Study 2018‐2022 final, 19.11.2018 12th Corridor Forum Meeting Agenda of the 12th meeting of the Corridor Forum 1 Opening and Welcome (Pat Cox, European Coordinator) 2 Tour de table 3 Adoption of the Agenda and the Minutes of Meeting of the 11th Corridor Forum Meeting 4 3rd phase of the studies on TEN-T CNC & Support of CNC Coordinators (Contractor Consortium), followed by discussion 5 Reporting back from the Ideas Laboratories/working group meetings (Contractor Consortium) 6 First issues of the CNC study Coordinators (Contractor Consortium), followed by Questions & Answers 7 Information about the CEF 2 Regulation proposal (by MOVE B2) 8 Reporting on CEF Call 2017 results, the 2018 and future potential Calls and the state of the play of CEF projects on the ScanMed Corridor (INEA contact person) 9 Presentation of selected projects on the ScanMed Corridor - Follo Line (by Banenor Project Director Per David Borenstein) - Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link (by Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link representative Jakob Vestergaard) - Brenner Base Tunnel (by BBT SE directors Konrad Bergmeister and Raffaele Zurlo) 10 Information on the Coordinators activities (European Coordinator), followed by Questions & Answers 11 Any other business 12 Conclusions / wrap-up (European Coordinator) End of the meeting, around 18:00 Date: 11 November 2018 8 Organisation of the work European agreement* Member States Advisor secretariat* Coordinator & Norway consultation* Corridor Forum support** Working Groups European Contract Contract KombiConsult Subcontractors Commission DG MOVE GruppoCLAS HaCon Cove rage o f Co rrido r Issues DG REGIO - Geographic INEA Prognos Ramböll - Thematic EIB ERA HPC etal CONSORTIUM *Regulation (EU) 1315/2013, Chapter IV, in particular Article 46; ** Service Contract of June 2018 Date: June 2018 9 © KombiConsult GmbH 4 ScanMed Study 2018‐2022 final, 19.11.2018 12th Corridor Forum Meeting Scope of the study . Further elaborating the Corridor knowledge base with updating the transport market study from the 2014 Study, the corr idor ch aract eri sti cs and th e s ta te o f the in fras truc ture (Tas k 1); . Further refining and complementing the project list. Complementing the projects with projects descriptions, parameters, KPI’s, etc. (Task 2) New. Monitoring and analysing the state of project implementation (Task 3); . Updating the work plan under special consideration of barriers that constrain the implementation of the corridor, the corridor's impact on the environment and health, as well as the pppossible impact of climate chang e on the existing infrastructure (Task 4); . Preparing the follow-up meetings of the Corridor Forum and assist in executing its task laid down in Article 46 of the TEN-T Regulation (Task 5). Date: June 2018 11 Reporting Periods, Reports, Work Plans, Meetings 1st Phase 2nd Phase 3rd Phase 4th Phase Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 … 2030 Adoption of Regulations KPI/ Status Compliance Data 2014 Status Data 2016 Status Data 2017 Status Data 2018 Status Data 2020 Projects Actions Accomplished Planned Projects Study 2014 2016 2017 2018 2020 Reports Study Report Report Update Update Work WP I WP II WP III WP IV WP V Plan 12/2014 12/2016 4/2018 12/2019 12/2021 Forum Meetings 1 … 4 5 … 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Date: November 2018 17 Thursday, 20.06.2019 © KombiConsult GmbH 5 ScanMed Study 2018‐2022 final, 19.11.2018 12th Corridor Forum Meeting Deliverables and Events for Phase I (2018-2020) – Status Type Due date Status Inception Report Phase I 7/2018 Accepted Project Implementation Report 1/2018 (Task 3. 1-33)3.3) 9/2018 Accepted Management Meeting 2 24.10.2018 Carried out Corridor Forum Meeting 12 (Task 5) 19.11.2018 ongoing Corridor Study Update I (Task 1) 11/2018 drafted Management Meeting 3 4/2019 Intermediate Report Phase I 5/2019 Project Implementation Report 1/2019 (Task 3.1-3.3) 5/2019 Corridor Forum Meeting 13 (Task 5) 6/2019 Project List Update 2019 (Task 2) 7/2019 Management Meeting 4 10/2019 Project Implementation Report 2/2019 (Task 3.1-3.3) 10/2019 Corridor Forum Meeting 14 (Task 5) 11/2019 Elements for the 4th Work Plan (Task 4) 12/2019 Project Implementation Report 1/2020 (Task 3.1-3.3) 4/2020 Corridor Forum Meeting 15 (Task 5) 5/2020 Final Report Phase I 5/2020 Monthly 2-pages progress reports #1 - #24 6/2018 ... Date: July 2018 21 © KombiConsult GmbH 6 ScanMed Study 2018‐2022 final, 19.11.2018 12th Corridor Forum Meeting Agenda of the 12th meeting of the Corridor Forum 1 Opening and Welcome (Pat Cox, European Coordinator) 2 Tour de table 3 Adoption of the Agenda and the Minutes of Meeting of the 11th Corridor Forum Meeting 4 3rd phase of the studies on TEN-T CNC & Support of CNC Coordinators (Contractor Consortium), followed by discussion 5 Reporting back from the Ideas Laboratories/working group meetings (Contractor Consortium) 6 First issues of the CNC study Coordinators (Contractor Consortium), followed by Questions & Answers 7 Information about the CEF 2 Regulation proposal 8 Reporting on CEF Call 2017 results, the 2018 and future potential Calls and the state of the play of CEF projects on the ScanMed Corridor (INEA contact person) 9 Presentation of selected projects on the ScanMed Corridor - Follo Line (by Banenor Project Director Per David Borenstein) - Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link (by Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link representative Jakob Vestergaard) - Brenner Base Tunnel (by BBT SE directors Konrad Bergmeister and Raffaele Zurlo) 10 Information on the Coordinators activities (European Coordinator), followed by Questions & Answers 11 Any other business 12 Conclusions / wrap-up (European Coordinator) End of the meeting, around 18:00 Date: 11 November 2018 22 Working Groups organised as „Ideas Laboratories“ .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Planning for the German Rail Access Route to the Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link
    Planning for the German rail access route to the Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link (Lubeck - Fehmarn section) 2014-DE-TM-0224-S Scandinavian-Mediterranean Multi-Annual Call Funding Objective 1 Member State(s) involved: Germany C:\Temp\fichemaps\20150630AfterCorrs\2014-DE-TM-022 (Coordinating) Applicant: Bundesministerium fur Verkehr und digitale Infrastruktur Implementation schedule: Image found and displayed. Start date: January 2014 End date: December 2020 Requested funding: Total eligible costs: €83 347 500 Requested funding: €41 673 750 Requested EU support: 50.00% Back in 2007 Denmark and Germany agreed to build a fixed link to replace the Recommended funding: ferry route linking their countries and reduce the crossing of the strait of one hour and provide more crossing capacity between their countries. The Action is located Recommended total eligible on the Scandinavian - Mediterranean Core Network Corridor, is a pre-identified €68 447 500 costs: project and is part of a Global Project which aims at connecting central Europe to Recommended funding: €34 223 750 the Nordic countries. While Denmark is responsible to build a combined road and rail tunnel, Germany is going to build the associated rail access route on the Recommended EU support: 50.00% German side. The proposed study is about compiling the final design and approval planning documents which will secure planning consent for the section of double- track electrified line between Lübeck and Puttgarden and will provide the basis for the call to tender for building and construction works. Evaluation Remarks The proposed Action in its reduced scope is extremely relevant and very mature. The bilateral agreement on the construction of the Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link and its associated access routes was formalised in a treaty signed in September 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternatives for Upgrading the Nykøbing Falster - Puttgarden Railway Line
    ALTERNATIVES FOR UPGRADING THE NYKØBING FALSTER - PUTTGARDEN RAILWAY LINE JOANNA PAULINA LAZEWSKA, S150897 Danmarks Tekniske Universitet MASTER THESIS AUGUST 2017 ALTERNATIVES FOR UPGRADING THE NYKØBING FALSTER - PUTTGARDEN RAILWAY LINE MAIN REPORT AUTHOR JOANNA PAULINA LAZEWSKA, S150897 MASTER THESIS 30 ETCS POINTS SUPERVISORS STEVEN HARROD, DTU MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING HENRIK SYLVAN, DTU MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING RUSSEL DA SILVA, ATKINS Alternatives for upgrading the Nykøbing F — Puttgarden railway line Joanna Paulina Lazewska, s150897, August 14th 2017 Preface This project constitutes the Master’s Thesis of Joanna Lazewska, s150897. The project is conducted at the Department of Management Engineering of the Technical University of Denmark in the spring semester 2017. The project accounts for 30 ECTS points. The official supervisors for the project have been Head of Center of DTU Management Engineering Henrik Sylvan, Senior Adviser at Atkins Russel da Silva, and Associate Professor at DTU Steven Harrod. I would like to extend my gratitude to Russel da Silva for providing skillful guidance through the completion of project. Furthermore, I would like to thank Henrik Silvan and Steven Harrod for, in addition to guidance, also providing the project with their broad knowledge about economic and operational aspects of railway. In addition, I would like to thank every one who has contributed with material, consultations and guidance in the completion of this project, especially Rail Net Denmark that provided materials and plans, as well as guidance at the technical aspects of the project. A special thank is given to Atkins, which has provided office facilities, computer software, and railway specialists’ help throughout the project. It would not be possible to realize project without their help.
    [Show full text]
  • Zero-Emission Ferry Concept for Scandlines
    Zero-Emission Ferry Concept for Scandlines Fridtjof Rohde, Björn Pape FutureShip, Hamburg/Germany Claus Nikolajsen Scandlines, Rodby/Denmark Abstract FutureShip has designed a zero-emission ferry for Scandlines’ Vogelfluglinie (linking Puttgarden (Germany) and Rødby (Denmark), which could be deployed by 2017. The propulsion is based on liquid hydrogen converted by fuel cells for the electric propulsion. The hydrogen could be obtained near the ports using excess electricity from wind. Excess on-board electricity is stored in batteries for peak demand. Total energy needs are reduced by optimized hull lines, propeller shape, ship weight and procedures in port. 1. Introduction The “Vogelfluglinie” denotes the connection of the 19 km transport corridor between Puttgarden (Germany) and Rødby (Denmark), Fig.1. This corridor has been served for many years by Scandlines ferries, which transport cars and trains. Four ferries serve two port terminals with specifically tailored infrastructure, Fig.2. The double- end ferries do not have to turn around in port, which contributes to the very short time in port. Combined with operating speed between 15 and 21 kn, departures can be offered every 30 minutes. After decades of unchal- lenged operation, two developments appeared on the horizon which changed the business situation for Scandli- nes fundamentally: 1. New international regulations would curb permissible thresholds for emissions from ships in the Baltic Sea: Starting from 2015, only fuels with less than 0.1% sulphur, i.e. a 90% reduction compared to present opera- tion, will be permissible for Baltic Sea shipping. Starting from 2016, Tier III of MARPOL’s nitrogen oxides (NOx) regulations will become effective.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of the Fixed Fehmarn Belt Link on the Transport of Forest Products from Northern to Central Europe
    Impact of the Fixed Fehmarn Belt Link on the Transport of Forest Products from Northern to Central Europe TENTacle [WP 2, Activity 2.1] Version: final [05.02.2018] Pl ease add your own picture 1 Content Executive summary ................................................................................................................... 6 1 Objective and goal ............................................................................................................. 7 2 Transport of Northern European forest products to Central Europe ..................................... 8 3 The place of the FBFL in the Scandinavia -Central Europe transport system and the development of forest products shipments by 2030 ...........................................................12 4 Possible changes in the modal split forest products exports to continental Europe and shifts from the ferry lines to the FBFL.................................................................................15 5 Recommendations for the maritime industry to secure their transport shares ....................18 Annexes: Main Nordic manufacturers of forest products Annex 1: Billerudkorsnäs group- overview of sea transport................................................... 18 Annex 2: Metsä Group - overview of sea transport ............................................................... 20 Annex 3: SCA group - overview of sea transport ................................................................... 22 Annex 4: Stora-Enso group - overview of sea transport ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Danish Transport System, Facts and Figures
    The Danish Transport System Facts and Figures 2 | The Ministry of Transport Udgivet af: Ministry of Transport Frederiksholms Kanal 27 DK-1220 København K Udarbejdet af: Transportministeriet ISBN, trykt version: 978-87-91013-69-0 ISBN, netdokument: 978-87-91013-70-6 Forsideill.: René Strandbygaard Tryk: Rosendahls . Schultz Grafisk a/s Oplag: 500 Contents The Danish Transport System ......................................... 6 Infrastructure....................................................................7 Railway & Metro ........................................................ 8 Road Network...........................................................10 Fixed Links ............................................................... 11 Ports.......................................................................... 17 Airports.....................................................................18 Main Transport Corridors and Transport of Goods .......19 Domestic and International Transport of Goods .... 22 The Personal Transport Habits of Danes....................... 24 Means of Individual Transport................................ 25 Privately Owned Vehicles .........................................27 Passenger Traffic on Railways..................................27 Denmark - a Bicycle Nation..................................... 28 4 | The Ministry of Transport The Danish Transport System | 5 The Danish Transport System Danish citizens make use of the transport system every The Danish State has made large investments in new day to travel to
    [Show full text]
  • Cost–Benefit Analysis of the Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link Report
    Cost–benefit analysis of The Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link Report The Danish Ministry of Transport Cost–benefit analysis of The Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link Contents 1 Summary 3 2 Overview 5 2.1 Introduction 5 2.2 Results 5 2.3 Report structure 7 3 Assumptions and traffic 8 3.1 Availability and assumptions 8 3.2 Scenarios 8 3.3 Road transport 9 3.4 Rail transport 11 4 The State 13 4.1 Construction costs, EU grants and operations and reinvestments 13 4.2 Revenue, fixed links 15 4.3 Operating costs for trains 15 4.4 Taxes and tax corrections 16 5 Users 18 5.1 Benefits for road traffic 18 5.2 Benefits for rail traffic 19 6 Other impacts 21 6.1 External costs (environment, climate, noise and accidents) 21 6.2 Labour supply impact 21 6.3 Correction to revenues from ferries 22 7 Sensitivity analyses and non-valued impacts 23 8 References 25 Authors Contact Date Thomas Odgaard, Director and Partner Incentive 5 January 2015 Kristian Kolstrup, Manager and Partner Holte Stationsvej 14, 1. DK-2840 Holte, Denmark T: (+45) 61 333 500 E: [email protected] W: incentive.dk 2 Cost–benefit analysis of The Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link 1 Summary The Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link is one of the largest standalone construction projects currently underway in Denmark. In the same way as the Great Belt Fixed Link and the Øresund Bridge significantly reduced travelling time and brought two regions and countries closer together, a Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link would bring Denmark and Scandinavia closer to Germany and the rest of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Work Plan of the European Coordinator Pat Cox
    Scandinavian DECEMBER 2016 Mediterranean Second Work Plan of the European Coordinator Pat Cox Mobility and Transport DECEMBER 2016 This report represents the opinion of the European Coordinator and does not prejudice the official position of the European Commission. Second Work Plan of the European Coordinator Scan-Med Table of Contents 1 Towards the sec ond Scandinavian-Mediterra nean Corridor work pla n..................3 1.1 General Introduction ...........................................................................3 1.2 Technical Introduction .........................................................................4 2 Characteristics of the Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor ..............................6 2.1 Corridor alignme nt ..............................................................................6 2.2 Corridor c harac teristic s ........................................................................8 2.3 Compliance with technical infrastructure parameters of the TEN-T guidelines (inc l. KPI ana lys is results) .............................................................................8 3 Results of the transport market study ......................................................... 19 4 Capac ity issues ....................................................................................... 20 5 The identified planned projects .................................................................. 21 6 Financ ing issues and tools......................................................................... 24 7 Critic al issues
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Executive Summary of the Bottleneck Analysis Here
    STRING bottleneck analysis for the stretch Oslo – Hamburg Prepared by KombiConsult GmbH (lead partner), Ramboll Norway, Ramboll Sweden and Ramboll Denmark Summary February 2021 Seamless transportation is a prerequisite 1 for growth A high-quality transport infrastructure with sufficient capacity and which is managed efficiently is fundamental for the competitiveness of the economies of the Member States of the European Union (EU). The EU has been contributing to ensure the goal above, amongst other instruments1, through the trans-European transport network (TEN-T) policy. The primary objective for The EU “is to establish a complete and integrated trans-European transport network, covering all Member States and regions and providing the basis for the balanced development of all transport modes in order to facilitate their respective advantages, and thereby maximising the value added for Europe”. The STRING stretch is an integral part of the TEN-T Core Network Corridor Scandinavian-Mediterranean (Scan-Med)2 and already shows a high quality, today. However, and in particular with view on the envisaged completion of the Scan-Med corridor by 2030, still some gaps are expected to remain from today's point of view. Transport and infrastructure bottlenecks can affect the normal flow of transportation, causing unnecessarily long travel times, delays, congestions, costs etc. KombiConsult GmbH and Rambøll have analysed the existing bottlenecks in the STRING - geography outlining future recommended priorities. This paper is a summary of the main findings of the analysis. 1 The White paper 2011 “Roadmap to a single European Transport Area – towards a competitive and resource efficient transport systems with the goal of “A 50% shift of medium distance intercity passenger and freight journeys from road to rail and waterborne transport”.
    [Show full text]
  • TEN-T Core Network Corridors the Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor
    ScanMed 8th Corridor Forum Meeting 27.09.2016 TEN-T Core Network Corridors The Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor Presentation at 8th Corridor Forum Meeting Brussels, 27.09.2016 Agenda of the 8th meeting of the Corridor Forum 1 Opening and Welcome (Pat Cox, European Coordinator) 2 Tour de table 3 Adoption of the Minutes of Meeting of the 7th Corridor Forum Meeting 4 Report by INEA on the results of the CEF Call 2015 (by INEA) 5 Information on the call 2016 (by MOVE B4) 6 Short reporting about the TEN-T Days in Rotterdam (by MOVE B1) 7 Presentation on the state of the play of the study (by Contractor Consortium): - Conclusions on the second ideas lab on rail road terminals - Final Report on the Project List - Preliminary Report on the elements of the 2nd generation Work Plan - Cooperation with the Rail Freight Corridor ScanMed 8 Feedback from the Forum members 9 Preparation of the 2nd generation Work Plan (by European Coordinator) - State of the play - Schedule for acceptance by the Member States 10 Further steps: next Corridor Forum meetings, ad hoc working groups, missions, conferences on the Corridor, involvement of stakeholders (by European Coordinator) 11 Any other business 12 Conclusions / wrap-up (by European Coordinator) End of the meeting, around 14:30 Restricted meeting with representatives of the MS and Norway, 14:30-16:00 Date: September 2016 2 © KombiConsult GmbH 1 ScanMed 8th Corridor Forum Meeting 27.09.2016 Nine TEN-T Core Network Corridors Date: 18 April 2016 3 European Commission; http://ec.europa.eu/transport/infrastructure/tentec/tentec-portal/site/en/maps.html NO SE Turku- Kouvola FI RU Naantali Oslo Örebro Stockholm Kotka- Alignment of ScanMed Corridor (Hallsberg) Helsinki Hamina NSB Göteborg Mjölby København .
    [Show full text]
  • Economy-Wide Benefits Dynamic and Strategic Effects of a Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link
    Economy-wide benefits Dynamic and Strategic Effects of a Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link Report prepared for the Ministry of Transport, Denmark and the Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing, Germany by Copenhagen Economics Aps and Prognos AG, June 2004 Ministry of Transport, Denmark Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing, Germany Economy-wide benefits Dynamic and Strategic Effects of a Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link June 2004 A report from Copenhagen Economics ApS, Denmark and Prognos AG, Germany kolofon Titel: Economy-wide Benefits - Dynamic and Strategic Effects of a Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link Forfatter: Copenhagen Economics Aps og Prognos AG Udgiver/forlægger: Trafikministeriet Ansvarlig institution: Trafikministeriet Emneord: Faste forbindelser, Femarn Bælt, dynamiske og strategiske effekter, generelle ligevægtsmodeller Resumé: Copenhagen Economics Aps og Prognos AG har for de danske og tyske trafikministerier udarbejdet en analyse af de dynamiske og strategiske effekter af en fast forbindelse over Femarn Bælt. Sprog: Engelsk ISBN: 87-91511-03-8 Economy-wide benefits Table of Contents Preface .......................................................................................................................... 3 Summary ....................................................................................................................... 4 How do the dynamic and strategic effects arise? .....................................................................6 Why are the dynamic and strategic effects additional? ............................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • The Fixed Fehmarn Belt Link Between Denmark and Germany and Its
    The fixed Fehmarn Belt link between Denmark and Germany and its importance for the economic growth By Brian Gardner Mogensen, Department in the Danish Capital Head of Transport Region Economics, Grontmij Geograhfic overview – North-Vest Europe Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link Fehmern Belt Fixed Link – Design Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link - Facts Price 41 billions DKK / Government-guaranteed loans Length 19 km / 11,9 miles Payment Model User funded Trafic - 10,800 vehicles per day - 3,800 train passengers per day - 1,300 train wagons per day The goal of the paper is to analyze the effects of the fixed Femern Baelt- connection with regard to the change in traffic flows and the impact on growth in the Capital Region in 2030. Capital Approach - The direct effects caused by changes in the traffic flows are inserted as initial impulse in a regional economic input-output model for the Capital Region of Denmark. - The initial impulse or primary effect can be defined as changes in employment and/or the revenue in one of the examined industries and the derived output consists of changes in direct, indirect and induced employment, production, gross value added and tax revenue in the remaining economy in the region The expected changes as to traffic flows are based on the Fehmarn Belt Traffic Consortium's official forecast from 2003, supplemented with more recent data and forecasts. Traffic flows are projected to 2030 when it is expected that traffic flows will have adapted to the new infrastructure. Basic assumptions The opening year for the fixed connection 2021 Annual growth of the ferry traffic for the period until the opening of the connection in 2021 2.3 % p.a.
    [Show full text]
  • Fourth Work Plan of the European Coordinator Pat Cox SEPTEMBER 2020
    Scandinavian Mediterranean Fourth Work Plan of the European Coordinator Pat Cox SEPTEMBER 2020 Mobility and Transport SEPTEMBER 2020 This report represents the opinion of the European Coordinator and does not prejudice the official position of the European Commission. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for any potential use which may be made of the information contained herein. Study on Scan-Med TEN-T Core Network Corridor, 3rd Phase, Work Plan 4 Table of Content th 1 Towards the Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor 4 Work Plan ................. 7 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................... 7 1.2 Achievements along the Corridor since 2014 ............................................. 7 2 Characteristics of the Scan-Med Corridor .................................................12 2.1 Alignment ............................................................................................ 12 2.2 Compliance 2018 and 2030 with the TEN-T guidelines parameters .............. 14 2.3 Persisting bottlenecks and missing links ................................................... 23 3 Transport Market Study .........................................................................27 3.1 Current flows along the Corridor ............................................................. 27 3.2 The Corridor scenario ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]