Appendix II - T Islands District Summaries of Written/Oral Representations
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
T. Islands District - 366 - T. Islands District Appendix II - T Islands District Summaries of Written/Oral Representations Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O 1 All 1 - (a) Supports the provisional Item (a) DCCAs recommendations on T07 The supporting view is noted. (Discovery Bay), T08 (Peng Chau & Hei Ling Chau), T09 (Lamma & Po Toi) and T10 (Cheung Chau). (b) Holds reservation on the Items (b) and (c) provisional In respect of the 2019 DC recommendations on T01 Ordinary Election, the (Lantau), T02 (Yat Tung Government has completed Estate South), T03 (Yat the review on the number of Tung Estate North), T04 elected seats and the (Tung Chung South), T05 subsidiary legislation was (Tung Chung Central) and passed by the LegCo in T06 (Tung Chung North) January 2018. There is no because the populations of additional seat in the Islands the DCCAs concerned are District for the next DC the highest in Hong Kong, Ordinary Election. In far exceeding the statutory accordance with the EACO, permissible upper limit. the EAC must follow the number of elected seats Taking into account the stipulated for each DC under future overall development the DCO in delineating the plan of Tung Chung and DCCA boundaries. The Lantau, proposes that the EAC has no power to increase EAC should request the or decrease the number of Government to add at least elected seats/DCCAs in any two more seats in the administrative district. Islands District in respect of the 2023 DC Ordinary As this proposal made in the Election so as to cater for representation is related to the * W: Number of written representations. O : Number of oral representations. T. Islands District - 367 - T. Islands District Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O the community problems enactment of the primary caused by the increase in legislation, which does not population and foster the fall under the purview of the development of district EAC, the EAC has referred administration. the relevant view to the CMAB for consideration. (c) Proposes to amend the EACO and DCO to allow Besides, in drawing up the the EAC to increase or delineation recommendations, reduce the number of seats the EAC must strictly adhere in every administrative to the statutory criteria under district within the limit of the EACO and its working 10% so as to cater for each principles. The delineation administrative district’s should be made on the basis need on the basis of its of the projected populations, population and community existing DCCA boundaries characteristics. Under the and relevant local factors. above proposal, the Islands The EAC will continue to District can add one seat to adhere to the above in future balance the situation that delineation exercises. some of the DCCAs in Tung Chung have populations of more than 20 000 while those in the DCCAs of Peng Chau and Lamma Island are less than 7 000. 2 All - 1 Holds no objection to the The view is noted. DCCAs provisional recommendations on all DCCAs of the Islands District. 3 All 1 - Hopes the EAC to review the As the matter mentioned in the DCCAs delineation of DCCAs and representation is related to the number of seats in the present enactment of the primary delineation exercise and no legislation, which does not fall need to conduct the review in under the purview of the EAC, 2023. the EAC has referred the relevant view to the CMAB for consideration. T. Islands District - 368 - T. Islands District Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O 4 All 1 - States that there is a technical This proposal is not accepted DCCAs error in the provisional because: recommendations on the Islands District because among (i) in accordance with the the 10 DCCAs, the populations EACO, apart from taking of two DCCAs will be below into account the projected the statutory permissible lower population, the EAC must limit while five of them will also have regard to the exceed the statutory other statutory factors permissible upper limit. including community Moreover, the population of identities, preservation of the Islands District is around local ties and physical 190 000 and so 11.18 DC features (such as the size, members are required. The shape, accessibility and representation considers that development) of the the delineation of DCCAs in relevant area. The EAC the Islands District has the cannot adjust the following negligence: boundaries solely with strict compliance with the the CMAB did not take the statutory permissible unique geographical factors range without considering of the Islands District into the other statutory factors consideration; mentioned above. When drawing up the the REO did not provide provisional advice to CMAB; recommendations, the EAC has examined the LegCo did not realise the feasibility of combining profound effect that could be T08 (Peng Chau & Hei brought about by the Ling Chau) and T09 calculation of the figures (Lamma & Po Toi). related to the DCCAs; and However, as these two DCCAs do not have any the Islands DC has direct transport link, the knowledge on the EAC proposed that the geographical and population boundaries of the above distribution of the Islands two DCCAs should District as well as the remain unchanged and increase in population in their populations be Lantau and Tung Chung but allowed to continue to it did not object to the deviate from the number of DCCAs for the permissible range (the Islands District. populations of the above T. Islands District - 369 - T. Islands District Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O To solve the problem of the two DCCAs in the 2015 Islands District, proposes: delineation exercise were also allowed to deviate to combine T08 (Peng Chau from the statutory & Hei Ling Chau) and T09 permissible range); and (Lamma & Po Toi); or (ii) please see items 1(b) and the EAC to suggest to the (c). Government amending the DCO for adding one DCCA to the Islands District. After that, to split T01 (Lantau) into T01 “Lantau” and T11 “North Lantau” and maintain the original boundaries of T02 (Yat Tung Estate South) and T03 (Yat Tung Estate North). 5 All 1 - Supports the combination of This proposal is not accepted DCCAs Cheung Chau to free up a because: DCCA for creation in Tung Chung. Moreover, as the (i) according to the proposal populations of T01 (Lantau), made in the T02 (Yat Tung Estate South) representation to adjust and T03 (Yat Tung Estate the boundaries of T04 North) will far exceed the (Tung Chung South), statutory permissible upper T05 (Tung Chung limit and those of T08 (Peng Central) and T06 (Tung Chau & Hei Ling Chau) and Chung North), the T09 (Lamma & Po Toi) will affected population will be far below the statutory be larger than that in the permissible lower limit, provisional proposes to combine T08 recommendations; and (Peng Chau & Hei Ling Chau) and T09 (Lamma & Po Toi) (ii) please see item 4. and change the name of the DCCA to “Peng Chau, Hei Ling Chau, Lamma and Po Toi”. On the basis of the above proposals, except that the T. Islands District - 370 - T. Islands District Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O provisional recommendations on T07 (Discovery Bay) remain unchanged, proposes to adjust the boundaries of other DCCAs as follows: T01 (Lantau) includes the areas covered in the provisional recommendations but to exclude all the villages in the north of Shek Mun Kap. New DCCA T02 includes Mun Tung Estate, Yu Tai Court and all the villages in the north of Shek Mun Kap. T02 (Yat Tung Estate South) includes Yat Tung (I) Estate. Changes the DCCA code to T03. Retains the name of the DCCA as “Yat Tung Estate South”. T03 (Yat Tung Estate North) includes Yat Tung (II) Estate. Changes the DCCA code to T04. Retains the name of the DCCA as “Yat Tung Estate North”. T04 (Tung Chung South) includes Tung Chung Crescent, Fu Tung Estate and Yu Tung Court. Changes the DCCA code to T05. T05 (Tung Chung Central) includes Seaview Crescent and Coastal Skyline. Changes the DCCA code to T06. T. Islands District - 371 - T. Islands District Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O T06 (Tung Chung North) includes Caribbean Coast, Ying Tung Estate, The Visionary and Century Link. Changes the DCCA code to T07. 6 All 1 - Considers that the number of In drawing up the delineation DCCAs DCCAs in the Islands District recommendations, the EAC should not be decided by must strictly adhere to the population alone as in other statutory criteria under the administrative districts. Its EACO and its working unique situation should be principles. The delineation taken into consideration. should be made on the basis of the projected populations, existing DCCA boundaries and relevant local factors. The EAC will continue to adhere to the above in future delineation exercises. Moreover, the recommendations of the EAC are made on the basis of overall consideration from a macro perspective. No special emphasis to any particular administrative district or DCCA will be given. 7 T01 – 2 - (a) Propose the EAC to Item (a) Lantau maintain the original These proposals are not boundaries of T02 (Yat accepted because: T02 – Tung Estate South) and T03 Yat Tung (Yat Tung Estate North) (i) in respect of the 2019 DC Estate and request the Ordinary Election, the South Government to add one Government has DCCA in the area of Mun completed the review on T03 – Tung Estate in T01 the number of elected Yat Tung (Lantau), maintain Cheung seats and the subsidiary Estate Chau in two DCCAs and legislation was passed by North combine T08 (Peng Chau & the LegCo in January Hei Ling Chau) and T09 2018.