Issue 4 2014 Edinburgh Postgraduate Law Conference Edition

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Issue 4 2014 Edinburgh Postgraduate Law Conference Edition Edinburgh Student Law Review 2015 Volume II | Issue 4 2014 Edinburgh Postgraduate Law Conference Edition i BLANK ii Acknowledgement The Edinburgh Postgraduate Law Conference Committee 2014 wishes to thank the University of Edinburgh Law School and the Institute for Academic Development for their financial assistance. iii Blank iv Sponsors v vi Edinburgh Postgraduate Law Conference 2014 Organising Committee Humberto Carrasco Tom Gerald Daly Laura Downey David Komuves Ekrem Solak Leslie Stevens LL.M. Liaison to the Organising Committee Ognjenka Manojlovic LL.M. Assistants Basant Abdel-Ghany Abdel-Meguid Emiel de Buijne Thomas Godener Fabian Michl Neža Šubic Ellen Heyd David Retzmann Ciaran Donohue vii Blank viii Edinburgh Student Law Review 2014-15 Honorary President Lord Hope of Craighead Honorary Secretary Dr Andrew Steven Editor-in-Chief Lorna MacFarlane Content Editors Jiahong Chen Darin Clearwater María Paz Gatica Rodríguez Ilya A. Kotlyar Alexander Latham Alisdair MacPherson Alasdair Peterson Grant Stirling Marko John Supronyuk Griff Williams Amanda Wyper Chief Copy Editors Jann-Michael Greenburg Alisha Malik Terence Merck Finance Officers Publications Officer Joseph Stephen Liptrap Danielle McAlonan Shannon Russell Copy Editors Paul Alcorn, Natalia Bell, Rowena D. Carlton, John Callender, Daria Janus, Caitlin Jenkins, Maria Kelepeshi, Joseph Stephen Liptrap, Paloma Martyniuk, David Murphy, Emily O’Sullivan, Joanne Smith, Wai-Yee Tsang, Annie Valentine ix Blank x Foreword by Professor Richard Sparks It gives me great pleasure to welcome the publication of this special conference edition of the Edinburgh Student Law Review, containing a range of pieces written by speakers at the second Edinburgh Postgraduate Law Conference, held in December 2014. Having had the great pleasure of formally opening the conference, I have had the opportunity to see first-hand how much work went into the two-day event. Postgraduate law conferences, which have proliferated in recent years, offer a useful training ground for budding scholars, allowing them to hone presentation skills and exchange ideas in a supportive environment. The fact that participants at the 2014 conference came from over 30 universities across the UK and Europe demonstrates the value of providing fora for engagement and discussion between peers, making postgraduate students active agents in their own development as scholars. The breadth of articles in this collection attests to the quality of research showcased at the 2014 conference, and the extent to which contributors engaged with the conference theme of ‘Innovation in the Law’. A number of distinct trends can be observed. Human rights protection is a particular focus, including the rights implications of the so-called ‘war on terror’, the elderly as rights-holders and the new and controversial ‘right to be forgotten’ online. The law’s relation to, and regulation of, the internet, comes to the fore in articles on artificial intelligence and the internet, and the relationship between online activism and democratisation in China. A further grouping of pieces explores the capacity of law to regulate cultural and financial affairs, concerning the commodification of cultural products as well as the ongoing fall-out of the economic downturn for regulation of corporations and financial products. The final two articles, on the attempted invalidation of federal law by US states and the right to secession in international law, speak to two fundamental issues which gain currency in the contemporary Scottish context: the frictions generated in federal constitutional structures and the limits of law in governing what are essentially political questions. From its inception the Review has been produced for, and by, students. A thriving postgraduate research community is a central part of what makes our School the exciting and outward-looking place that it is today. The Editorial Board of the Review and the Conference xi Organising Committee 2014 are to be congratulated on this collaboration, which may serve as a model for future postgraduate conferences, both here in Edinburgh and elsewhere. Professor Richard Sparks Head, Edinburgh Law School June 2015 xii Note from the Conference Organising Committee 2014 This special edition of The Edinburgh Student Law Review is devoted to a selection of research papers presented by postgraduate scholars (LL.M and Ph.D researchers) at the second annual Edinburgh Postgraduate Law Conference, which took place at Edinburgh Law School on 1-2 December 2014 on the theme ‘Innovation in the Law: New Challenges, New Perspectives’, funded by Edinburgh University’s Institute of Academic Development (IAD) and the Law School. The 2014 conference featured thirty-six postgraduate speakers, selected from a pool of almost two hundred abstracts, grouped into twelve panels covering a range of subjects, including: the commodification of culture in the area of intellectual property; the legal framework governing ‘killer robots’; the democratisation of authoritarian regimes; and the so-called ‘right to be forgotten’ online. The selection here comprises thirteen of the original thirty-six presentations, re- worked as articles, having originally been posted as 1000-word blog posts on the conference blog at www.lawphd conference.ed.ac.uk/speakers-blog/. The quality of the articles here attests to the significant value of holding events to bring postgraduate legal scholars together. Speakers and participants at the 2014 conference hailed from 19 different UK universities, as well as 13 different non-UK universities, and the event provided a space for young scholars to obtain feedback on their research, connect with other researchers in their area, and leave behind the general solitude of postgraduate (especially Ph.D) life for two days. The success of the two Edinburgh Postgraduate Law conferences to date underscores the vibrancy of the postgraduate research community at Edinburgh, not least its variety of student-run discussion groups and the Review itself, which is also entirely student-run. This edition, a testament to the hard work of those at the Edinburgh Student Law Review and the fruits of 2014 Conference, are further evidence of this vitality. We are greatly indebted to the conference speakers for contributing their pieces, and to the Editorial Board of the Review for bringing it to completion. Edinburgh Postgraduate Law Conference Organising Committee 2014 Humberto Carrasco, Tom Gerald Daly, Laura Downey, David Komuves, Ekrem Solak and Leslie Stevens June 2015 xiii Blank xiv Editorial For the last two years, the Edinburgh Postgraduate Law Conference has provided a highlight of the winter academic (and social) calendar at the University of Edinburgh Law School. When we were approached by the 2014 Committee with an offer to collaborate on a special edition consisting of research papers from the 2014 Conference, we did not hesitate to accept. Many of our Board members had greatly enjoyed the Conference, and as a publication produced and written entirely by students, we welcome any opportunity to exhibit the work of our peers. This issue has allowed the Edinburgh Student Law Review to work with postgraduate students from thirteen different universities, and we have been greatly impressed by the diversity and quality of the articles submitted for this special issue. We would like to thank some particular people for their contributions to this issue. The work of our Copy Editors has ensured that this publication is of an exceptionally high quality in the field of student journals. Mr Neil Davidson’s assistance with the Review’s website, the primary means of dissemination for this issue, is much appreciated. We are grateful for the support and encouragement of our Honorary President, Lord Hope of Craighead, and our Honorary Secretary, Dr Andrew Steven. Our sponsors, Turcan Connell LLP, Thomson Reuters, DLA Piper LLP, and the University of Edinburgh Law Students’ Council, have offered invaluable encouragement and financial support. Finally, we thank the Conference Committee 2014 for suggesting that we work together to produce this issue, and echo their thanks to the Law School and the Institute for Academic Development, without whose support the Conference and this resulting issue would not have been possible. It is our hope that future Boards and Conference Committees will produce further special editions showcasing the excellent standard of research presented at the Law School through the Postgraduate Law Conferences. The Edinburgh Student Law Review Board 2014-15 May 2015 xv Blank xvi Contents Ben Stanford The ‘War on Terror’: Perpetual Emergency 1 Rosalind Butler Capabilities: A New Approach to Human Rights for the 17 Elderly Magdalena Jozwiak Slipping down the Slopes: The Vices and Virtues of 32 Forgetting Online Qi Chen Penal Populism Online and the Democratisation of 48 Authoritarian Regimes: The Case of China Jesus Manuel Artificial Legal Intelligence on the Internet: The Next 64 Niebla Zatarain Approach to Enforcing the Law Online Megan Rae Blakely The Value Problem in Law and 76 Intangible Cultural Heritage Andrea Zappalaglio The Protection of Geographical Indications: Ambitions 89 and Concrete Limitations Navajyoti Samanta Utilising Item Response Theory in Computing 103 Corporate Governance Indices Jan de Bruyne and Rating the EU Regulatory Framework on the Liability 117 Cedric Vanleenhove of Credit Rating Agencies – “Triple A or Junk”? Michael Wolfgang Does Legal Innovation Cope with Financial 129 Müller
Recommended publications
  • PROCEEDINGS of the 28Th ANNUAL MEETING FERTILIZER INDUSTRY ROUND TABLE 1978
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28th ANNUAL MEETING FERTILIZER INDUSTRY ROUND TABLE 1978 October 31, November 1 and 2, 1978 Sheraton-Biltmore Hotel Atlanta, Georgia Table of Contents / Tuesday, October 31st Tuesday, October 31 Morning Session Afternoon Session Moderators Continued Rodger C. Smith Harold D. Blenkhorn Page Panel Discussion Recent Pine Cross Experiences Remarks: Chairman Smith ........................ 1 Panel Leader Hubert L Balay Panelists Introduction: The Hon. Thomas T. Irvin Harold Green Donald J. Bruner Joe S. Drewry ................................... 1 R. O. Britt Albert P. Super Welcome to Georgia The Hon. Thomas T. Irvin. .. ........... 2 Page Gold Kist Pipe Cross Reactor Keynote Speaker Panelist Harold Green. .. ........... 47 Frank L Wooten ................................ 3 MFA Pipe Cross Reactor Moderator Blenkhorn ............................ 5 Panelist Donald J. Brunner ....................... 48 Nitrogen Outlook Swift Pipe Cross Reactor E. B. Graves .................................... 5 Panelist R. C. Britt. ............................ 49 The Medium Term Outlook for Phosphate Smith Douglas Pipe Cross Reactor P. L Louis - K. F. Isherwood Panelist Albert P. Super ......................... 50 Presented by P. L Louis ......................... 13 Questions and Answers Potash Supply I Demand Outlook Panel Leader E. H. Holzkaemper ............................. 20 Hubert L Balay ................................ 51 N.P.K. Utilization Toxic Substances - Hazardous Wastes Dr. R. E. Wagner .............................. 26 Karl
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Salary Projection Survey Summary
    2021 Salary Projection Survey Insights on compensation trends expected in 2021 - Summary report 38th edition | September 2020 Table of contents 1 Introduction 2 Compensation consulting 3 Participant profile 6 Survey highlights 8 Historical base salary increase trend 9 Base salary 11 Salary structure 13 Survey participants 22 Notice 22 For more information Introduction The results presented in this report are an analysis of responses collected between July and August 2020 to the 38th edition of Morneau Shepell’s 2021 Salary Projection Survey. The data represents a broad cross-section of industries representing 889 organizations across Canada and provides data on actual salary budget increase percentages for the past and current years, along with projected increases for next year. • The report contains segmented data and a detailed analysis by Morneau Shepell’s compensation consultants. • Survey participation jumped over 75% on a year over year basis from 506 organizations participating in 2019, to 889 in 2020. Many of these organizations also participated in our 2020 Canadian Salary Surveys. • Survey data includes actual 2020 and projected 2021 base salary increases and salary structure adjustments. • Survey data is reported excluding zeros and including zeros (freezes) but does not include temporary rollbacks due to COVID-19. • Findings are summarized for non-unionized employees. • Statistical requirements applied to the data analysis include a minimum of three organizations for average/mean reported results, and a minimum of five organizations
    [Show full text]
  • Canwest Top 100 Saskatchewan Companies
    Wednesday, September 30, 2009 Saskatoon, Saskatchewan TheStarPhoenix.com D1 New Top 100 list showcases Sask.’s diversification By Katie Boyce almost $3 billion since 2007. Viterra Inc., in its second year of his year’s Top 100 Saskatchewan operation, has also experienced significant Companies list is filled with sur- growth in revenue, jumping by almost T prises. $3 billion in the last year to claim third Besides a new company in the No. 1 spot, ranking. Long-standing leaders Canpotex 23 businesses are featured for the first time Limited and Cameco Corporation continue in the 2009 ranking, which is based on 2008 to make the top five, backed by the profit- gross revenues and sales. The additions able potash market. — headquartered in Carlyle, Davidson, Este- One major modification to this year’s list van, Lampman, Melfort, Regina, Rosetown, has been to exclude the province’s individual Saskatoon, Warman, and Yorkton — show retail co-operatives, instead allowing Feder- off the incredible economic growth that our ated Co-operatives Ltd. to represent these province has experienced during the last year. businesses. Another change has been in how 1 Covering a wide cross-section of industries SaskEnergy reports its revenue. Rather than in our province, newcomers to the list include providing gross revenue amounts, the crown PotashCorp Allan Construction, Kelsey Group of Compa- corporation started this fiscal year to report nies, Partner Technologies Incorporated and only net revenue, which accounts for the Reho Holding Ltd. (owner of several Warman significant drop in rankings. companies) in the manufacturing and con- The Top 100 Saskatchewan Companies is struction field, and Arch Transco Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Praise for Onjali Q. Rauf's Books from Children `
    PRAISE FOR ONJALI Q. RAUF'S` BOOKS FROM CHILDREN ‘I could not put it down once I had got it because it was so fantastic! It is all about bravery and determination’ Dorie, age 10 ‘It made my dad and me laugh and cry and made us want to help more’ Carey, age 7 ‘What! Oh no! I can’t believe it has finished! I wanted to read more!’ Ariana, age 8 ‘I don’t usually like reading. But this made me want to read lots more stories just like it’ Robert, age 8 ‘Your book was so good it made me stop fighting with my sister’ Adam, age 8 ‘We read it at school and everyone agreed it’s the best book ever. We never agree on anything so that was nice’ Ibrahim, age 8 ‘I used to think kids like me couldn’t be in stories. But now I feel like they can and that it’s OK’ Heliana, age 10 PRAISE FOR ONJALI Q. RAUF'S` BOOKS FROM ADULTS ‘A celebration of courage and friendship’ Guardian ‘Utterly delightful’ Mail on Sunday ‘Tearjerking and chuckle-inducing’ Sunday Post ‘A book that everyone should read in this day and age’ Bookseller ‘Fans of Wonder will love this inspiring story’ Week Junior ‘This is a beautiful, open-hearted debut that should help children . realise the power of kindness’ Booktrust AWARDS FOR ONJALI Q. RAUF'S` BOOKS Winner of the Blue Peter Book Award for Best Story 2019 Winner of the Waterstones Children’s Book Prize 2019 Shortlisted for the Branford Boase Award Shortlisted for the Independent Bookshop Week Award for Children’s Book 2019 Shortlisted for the Jhalak Prize Book of the Year 2019 CILIP Carnegie Medal 2019 Nominee Shortlisted for Children’s Fiction Book of the Year 2020 at the British Book Awards ORION CHILDREN’S BOOKS First published in Great Britain in 2020 by Hodder and Stoughton 1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2 Text copyright © Onjali Q.
    [Show full text]
  • By Barrie Dunsmor E PRESS POLITICS PUBLIC POLICY
    THE NEXT WAR: LIVE? by Barrie Dunsmor e The Joan Shorenstein Center PRESS POLITICS Discussion Paper D-22 March 1996 PUBLIC POLICY Harvard University John F. Kennedy School of Government Barrie Dunsmore 35 INTRODUCTION “Live” coverage is no longer a technological recognition that their effort, while sincere and marvel, though networks still rush to superim- determined, may fail. And so they “negotiate.” pose the word “live” over their coverage of a They say they respect each other’s needs. They Presidential news conference, a Congressional are sensitive to the awesome power of public hearing or the latest installment of the O.J. opinion in the age of television, faxes, cellular Simpson saga. Indeed, “live” coverage has been phones and other such miracles of communica- an option, though at the beginning an awkward tion. They are aware that any agreement and costly one, since the political conventions of reached in an atmosphere of peace may quickly 1948 and 1952. Over the years, as cameras have collapse in the pressures of war. become smaller, satellites more sophisticated, Neither side has to be reminded that the and the world more “digitalized,” costs have precedent for “live” coverage of war has been set. dropped dramatically, and many news events are Twice already, during the Persian Gulf War of now covered “live” routinely—except for the 1990-91, network correspondents reported “live” coverage of war. Yet, even here, too, it seems to from the Kuwaiti front—Forrest Sawyer for ABC be only a matter of time before anchors intro- News and Bob McKeowan for CBS News.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurovision Song Comtest Complete 88 89
    1980s !1 Eurovision Song Contest 1988 Björn Nordlund !1 Björn Nordlund 10 juni 2018 1988 Ne Partez pas sans moi Eurovision, sida !1 Björn Nordlund 10 juni 2018 1988 Suddenly it happens For you all whom read all the pages my number one song each year not exactly celebrate grand success. So all of a sudden it happens my favorite song ended up as number one, and lets face it… WOW, who knew anything about Celine Dion back in 1988? The Swiss entry, ”Ne partez pas sans moi” stole the crown this year at the end of the voting, thanks to Yugoslavias jury for some reason agreed with the French singer Gerard Lenorman that his entry was of the same class as ”My way” (”Comme d´habitude”). And I can imagine that the UK singer Scott Fitzgerald was a bit surprised over the outcome. In ans case, not only Celine Dion started her way to success this year, also Lara Fabian entered, but for Luxembourg. So how did my list compare to the final result this year. We had some really good entries but 1988 must be seen as a middle year even if songs like ”Pu og peir”, ”Nauravat Silmät muistetaan”, ”La chica que yo quiro” and ”Ka du se hva jeg sa”. Sweden sent our number one musical star Mr Tommy Körberg who went from the stages of the London musical scene to Eurovision (his second try) and for Swedish media it was all in the bag, Eurovision from Sweden 1989.. It turned out to be very wrong and the Swedish delegation blamed Tommys bad cold and voice problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Trash Tort Or Trash TV?: Food Lion, Inc
    St. John's Law Review Volume 72 Article 6 Issue 1 Volume 72, Winter 1998, Number 1 2012 Trash Tort or Trash TV?: Food Lion, Inc. v. ABC, Inc., and Tort Liability of the Media for Newsgathering Charles C. Scheim Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/lawreview Recommended Citation Scheim, Charles C. (1998) "Trash Tort or Trash TV?: Food Lion, Inc. v. ABC, Inc., and Tort Liability of the Media for Newsgathering," St. John's Law Review: Vol. 72: Iss. 1, Article 6. Available at: http://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/lawreview/vol72/iss1/6 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in St. John's Law Review by an authorized administrator of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Scheim: Trash Tort or Trash TV?: Food Lion, Inc. v. ABC, Inc., and Tort L COMMENT TRASH TORT OR TRASH TV?: FOOD LION, INC. V. ABC, INC., AND TORT LIABILITY OF THE MEDIA FOR NEWSGATHERING I don't like to hurt people.... I really don't like it at all. But in order to get a red light at the intersection, you sometimes have to have an accident. -Jack Anderson, Investigative Journalist' Although criticism of the press is certainly not new,2 the media has recently come under increasing scrutiny for what critics see as a more intrusive style of tabloid journalism.4 The 1 A Muckraker with a Mission, NEWSWEEK, Apr.
    [Show full text]
  • 27.10.2017 Notice Under Section 6 (2) of the Competition Act, 2002 Given by Agrium Inc. and Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan
    Fair Competition For Greater Good COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA (Combination Registration No. C-2016/10/443) 27.10.2017 Notice under Section 6 (2) of the Competition Act, 2002 given by Agrium Inc. and Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan, Inc. CORAM: Mr. Devender Kumar Sikri Chairperson Mr. Sudhir Mital Member Mr. Augustine Peter Member Mr. U. C. Nahta Member Mr. G. P. Mittal Member Legal Representatives of the parties: M/s Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. Order under Section 31 (7) of the Competition Act, 2002 (“Order”) 1. On 10.10.2016, the Competition Commission of India (“Commission”) received a notice (“Notice”) under Section 6(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 (“Act”) given by Agrium Inc. (“Agrium”) and Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan, Inc. (“PotashCorp”) (hereinafter, Agrium and PotashCorp are collectively referred to as the “Parties”). 2. The Notice was filed with the Commission pursuant to a Plan of Arrangement entered into by and between the Parties on 11.09.2016 (“Plan of Arrangement”). Page 1 of 21 Fair Competition COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA For Greater Good (Combination Registration No. C-2016/10/443) 3. In terms of Regulation 14 of Competition Commission of India (Procedure in regard to the transaction of business relating to combinations) Regulations, 2011 (“Combination Regulations”), vide letter dated 24.10.2016, the Parties were required to provide certain information / document(s) latest by 31.10.2016. The Parties filed their reply on 04.11.2016, after seeking extension of time. Letter under Regulation 14 in continuation to Parties’ reply was issued on 06.12.2016 and the Parties were directed to provide information / documents by 09.12.2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Subdued Stringband Jamboree Mos Bistro, Makeworth Market, the Firefly
    THE GRISTLE, P.06 + FUZZ BUZZ, P.09 + HIROSHIMA LIBRARY, P.10 c a s c a d i a PICKFORD CALENDAR INSIDE REPORTING FROM THE HEART OF CASCADIA WHATCOM*SKAGIT*SURROUNDING AREAS 07-31-2019 • ISSUE: 31 • V.14 SEEING STARS SUBDUED Outdoor dancing P.13 STRINGBAND CREATIVE CONUNDRUMS JAMBOREE Anacortes Arts Join the pickin’ party P.16 Festival P.14 SSINGS BIGFOOT O FESTIVAL Biped blowout in Maple Falls CR P.12 A brief overview of this Much Ado About Nothing: 7:30pm, Marine Park 26 Noises Off: 7:30pm, Anacortes Community Theatre Dynamic Duos: 9pm, Upfront Theatre FOOD week’s happenings THISWEEK DANCE Graffiti Dance Theater: 7:30pm, Firehouse Arts and Events Center Salsa Night: 9pm, Cafe Rumba In addition to activities REAR END 21 MUSIC Music at MoNA: 10:30am-5pm, Museum of North- such as face painting, west Art, La Conner 20 arts and crafts and Marrowstone Chamber Ensembles: 7:30pm, Performing Arts Center, WWU FILM bounce houses, an FILM annual Kid’s Fest Jurassic Park: Dusk, Fairhaven Village Green 16 happening Sat., Aug. COMMUNITY MUSIC Vintage Farming Days: 7am-6pm, Berthusen Park, 3 at Civic Stadium Lynden 14 will offer details Drayton Harbor Days: 10am-5pm, Blaine Marina and beyond ART about recreational Kid’s Fest: 11am-3pm, Civic Stadium 13 opportunities in GET OUT Whatcom County. Boat and Car Show: 10am-3pm, La Conner Marina STAGE FOOD Mount Vernon Market: 9am-2pm, Riverwalk Park 12 Anacortes Farmers Market: 9am-2pm, Depot Arts Center Saturday Market: 10am-1pm, Lummi Island GET OUT Lynden Farmers Market: 10am-2pm, Centennial Park Blaine
    [Show full text]
  • Supplier Response To
    OMNIA Region 4 FURNITURE, INSTALLATION, AND RELATED SERVICES RFP #19-18 Table of Contents: 3 - 11 Appendix A | Draft Contract Offer and Contract Signature Form 12 - 17 Appendix B | Terms and Conditions Acceptance Form 18 - 45 Products, Services, Pricing 46 - 49 Performance Capability 50 - 75 Appendix D, Exhibit A | Response for National Cooperative Contract 76 - 82 Appendix D, Exhibit B | Administration Agreement 83 - 88 Appendix D, Exhibit F | Federal Funds Certifications 89 - 90 Appendix D, Exhibit G, Doc #1 | Ownership Disclosure Form 91 - 92 Appendix D, Exhibit G, Doc #2 | Non-Collusion Affidavit 93 - 99 Appendix D, Exhibit G, Doc #3 | Affirmative Action Affidavit 100 - 105 Appendix D, Exhibit G, Doc #4 | Political Contribution Disclosure Form 106 - 107 Appendix D, Exhibit G, Doc #5 | Stockholder Disclosure Certification 108 - 110 Appendix D, Exhibit G, Doc #6 | Certification of Non-Involvement in Prohibited Activities in Iran 111 - 116 Appendix D, Exhibit G, Doc #7 | New Jersey Business Registration Certificate 117 - 129 Qualification and Experience 125 - 129 References 130 - 137 Value Add 138 - 139 Appendix C, Doc #1 | Acknowledgment and Acceptance of Region 4 ESC’s Open Records Policy 140 - 141 Appendix C, Doc #2 | Antitrust Certification Statements 142 - 143 Appendix C, Doc #3 | Implementation of House Bill 1295 Certificate of Interested Parties 144 - 145 Appendix C, Doc #4 | Texas Government Code 2270 Verification Form 146 - 147 Appendix C, Doc #5 | Addendum 148 - 189 Appendix C, Doc #6 | Questionnaire Appendix A | Draft Contract, Offer, and Contract Signature Form Appendix A | Draft Contract APPENDIX A DRAFT CONTRACT This Contract (“Contract”) is made as of __________, 2020 by and between (“Contractor”) and Region 4 Education Service Center (“Region 4 ESC”) for the purchase of ___________________________________________(“the products and services”).
    [Show full text]
  • Happy New Year!
    ABSOLUTELY FREE Vol. 21, No. 1 January 2017 You Can’t Buy It Happy New Year! She Wants To Do Right by Yvette L. Cummings, of Conway, SC. She won the 701 CCA Prize 2016 for South Carolina artists 40 years and younger. Cummings was announced as the winner during the December 1, 2016, 701 CCA Prize Celebration at Columbia’s 701 Center for Contemporary Art. ARTICLE INDEX Advertising Directory This index has active links, just click on the Page number and it will take you to that page. Listed in order in which they appear in the paper. Page 1 - Cover - Yvette L. Cummings Page 3 - The Sylvan Gallery, Peter Scala & Whimsy Joy by Roz Page 2 - Article Index, Advertising Directory, Contact Info, Links to blogs, and Carolina Arts site Page 5 - Karen Burnette Garner, The Wells Gallery at the Sanctuary, Halsey-McCallum Page 4 - Editorial Commentary, City of Charleston’s Gallery at Waterfront Park & Studios, Laura Liberatore Szweda &The Treasure Nest Art Gallery College of Charleston Page 6 - Fabulon Art & Call for Lowcountry Ceramic Artists Page 5 - College of Charleston cont. Page 7 - Rhett Thurman, Anglin Smith Fine Art, Helena Fox Fine Art, The Sylvan Gallery, Page 6 - College of Charleston cont. & Charleston Artist Guild The Wells Gallery at the Sanctuary, Spencer Art Galleries, McCallum-Halsey Page 8 - Art League of Hilton Head, Society of Bluffton Artists & Maye River Gallery Studios, Corrigan Gallery, Surface Craft Gallery, Saul Alexander Foundation Gallery, Page 9 - Maye River Gallery cont. & A Few Words From Down Under by Judith McGrath Gibbes
    [Show full text]
  • August 3, 1989 Hansard Evening
    LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF SASKATCHEWAN August 3, 1989 EVENING SITTING (a) the privatization of the Potash Corporation of ADJOURNED DEBATES Saskatchewan to foreign interests and other outside investors is not in the best interests of Saskatchewan people; SECOND READINGS (b) the privatization of the Potash Corporation of The Assembly resumed the adjourned debate on the proposed Saskatchewan will result in increased taxes and cut-backs motion by the Hon. Mr. Lane that Bill No. 20 — An Act in services for Saskatchewan people; and respecting the Reorganization of the Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan be now read a second time. (c) the privatization of the Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan has been overwhelmingly rejected by the Ms. Simard: — Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. Just before people of Saskatchewan. we adjourned for supper, I had indicated that what I had wanted to do this evening was to deal with the events leading up to 1975, So I will be moving that motion at the conclusion of my remarks, and my interpretation of those events, and why the potash Mr. Speaker. corporation was established, and therefore why the potash corporation should be retained. And so where I left off at just before supper was the point that if these deposits were properly managed, Mr. Speaker, properly I also wanted to talk about some of the accomplishments of the managed and properly developed, that we have, the Potash potash corporation, and why I felt these created a very strong Corporation of Saskatchewan has the potential to supply an argument for maintaining the public Crown corporation and not increasing proportion of world demand as the ore bodies in other for privatizing it.
    [Show full text]