DOCSLIB.ORG

Some Remarkable New Buildings New York L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

w a 1 + b I 1 t 8 I- I w THE SUN SUNDAY OCTOBER 2i 1904 SOME REMARKABLE NEW BUILDINGS NEW YORK L f SKYSCRAPERS GROWING BIGGER tsr fart s r r e p sr7t + lt ANEW STANDARD SET FOR THE HO MORE LUXURIOUS AND MORE y ty TELSOFTHEWORLDBYTHELATEST- r COSTLY THAN EVER BEFORE i = 3 OF THOSE BUILT IN NEW YORK fn i HOTEl ASTOR < 811ILOINv = HANOVER NATIONAL BAHH < BEAVER PfG7q IPYFfIlTIfv JH N Y 1 of i Mf5 BUIL lql aulo when It is said that each of the stones In the the Hotel Astor at Seventh avenue and There were persons In this city not many with little expression of architectural cornice at the eighteenth floor weighs Fortyfourth street and the Belmont and Ceara ago when the upward race in sky form between eighteen and twenty tons The the Brunswick in course of construction ecraper construction had hardly begun The Increased cost It is said results interior is finished in marble and bronze are factors In the change- who predicted that the excessively tall from the more elaborate and substantial It is said to beqne of tho most expensive It was not until after the WaldorfAstoria- buildings planned would not be successful finishing of the Interior and the more com ¬ office buildings in the world was opened that the builders of hotels and i either as money making properties or as plete equipment of the building with all The Blair Building which Is of white tho men who run them learned that Now i practical office structures sorts of modem Improvements For in- ¬ marble IB seventeen stories high and al- ¬ Yorkers and tho American public In gen- ¬ The lapse of time has proved that these stance many of the recent skyscrapers most equally elaborate In its interior fin- ¬ eral who come here wanted hotels whore a were mistaken Not only has the besides having all the usual sanitary s ngs they could get the best offered by the me skyscraper turned out to be a success in equipments have Installed the vacuum Tho Sixty Wall Street structure will bo- tropolis and that they were willing to pay every particular except perhaps archi- system of sweeping one of the giants of the city probably well for it They learned also from the suc¬ tecturally but it has come to be an absolute Lines of hose run from vacuum hydrants hlglier than any other office building ex- ¬ cess of tho Waldorf that tho appearance necessity in the corridors Sweepers are attached- clusive of towers Its steel frame partly of the exterior of tho hotel and the interior improved facilities er with the j to the hose and by running them over the covered looms up Impressively from the arrangements wnre much more potent for rapid transit shortly to be available office in twlnk- 1 rug the dirt is transferred a East River and the Brooklyn Bridgeand has factors in Its success than had been sup- In the lty and with the enlarging of the ling in- g from the room hundreds of feet caused a lot of wonder and comment posed before The St Regis Is eighteen i area of concentrated business activity that the air to the basement It will bo built in two sections and in stories high massive and of gray limestone should follow as a natural result the sky This is only one of the many modern Its architectural design will Illustrate the but it will be exceeded in height by the scraper will continue to be as popular and I conveniences which the business man of 1 kT Y S recent trend toward simplicity in exterior Hotel Belmont and tho Brunswick necessary is ¬ NDr WAG as it now remains to bo seen today expects to find in these great build- R GlS design The Wall street wing will be four- ¬ As Now York sets the fashion for the rest In the opinion of many indications but ings buildings that count their occupants- teen stories high and the Pine street section of the country In everything else sky- ¬ point to the conclusion that It will by the thousandthat alone constitute in twentysix Its height will be 347 feet scrapers Included so also it is predicted the buildings in two ¬ In erected the last some cases an entire route for a letter car- of the skyscraper If it really must be and But while some architects deplore the con- ¬ to he higher than the buildings constructed- the Times Building and the Park Row Build- by men competent to speak that the ad- gears or so including some of the notable ¬ rier and from which the dally mall is car- they admit that it must is a franker ex- ¬ ventional and what they cull inartistic at present It is not impossible though ing each with a tower exceeding It by vance in hotel construction and decoration 3 now in of jonia course construction there ried not by hand but by the wagon load pression of tho fact that there Is beneath trend in skyscraper architecture they ad ¬ that this objection may disappear In time several feet as typified in the St Regis and the Hotel has been a noticeable increase over tho The skyscraper has always been a thorn tho covering of stone and brick a frame mit that it U tho most notable and the The Hanover National Bank Building at The Beaver Building and the Times Build- ¬ Astor and other now hotels will shortly p In size and height- ¬ I tho in the flesh to the architect the student of steel most thoroughly American architecture of Nassau and Pine streets tho Beaver Build- ing like the Flatiron Building are notable strike a responsive chord in other large i of structures Where two years j the ago of the beaux arts and the man who wants There is ono building in the city com- ¬ the time and that it affords an opportunity- ing at Beaver and Spruce streets the Times for their striking appearance and represent cities as occurred after the erection of v was one Building now there but Flatiron frankness of expression In his design pleted only about a year ago which archi- ¬ for tho earning of the largest fees ever Building at Broadway and Fortysecond- some of tho best attainments thus far In tho Waldorf and that as a result of what two all ¬ there are or three just as remark These men complain that there is no tects agree la more successful in thi re- ¬ obtained by architects in general practice street and tho Sixty Wall Street Build getting the greatest possible amount ort has been done in New York there may In t able appearance as the one at Twenty attempt in the American skyscraper to spect than most others It Is called one So far as the height of the office building- ing now in course of construction are some floor room out of the available be expected another general upward step in third street make its appearance express its structure- of the few successful skyscrapers archi- ¬ of tho future is concerned there is it in of the most notable structures of the last spars hotel construction und equipment through- ¬ the office buildings have been It la a lie an uncouth lie from the founda- ¬ tecturally regarded In the city said practically no limit below CO or 70 year or two The changes In hotel construction an out the country growing bigger and higher they have It tion to the roof they say Seeking to It Is tho Blair Building at Brood street stories imposed by economical or structural The Hanover National Bank Building Is architecture during tho last two or three This means also these men say that VlaYeald been growing more costly the hide tho fact that It is built around a steel and Exchange place A picture of it is considerations All that will las necessary- noted for the massiveness of its structure years have been much more pronounced there will probably be a corresponding 1 Yl i cost In many instances being frame it simulates solid masonry included In the group above Its success is a FUfllcient amount of space for tho foun- ¬ tho characteristic deplored by many archi- ¬ than in tho skyscraper A distinctly new rise In the of j not a all proportionate to the Increase- Nearly all of thorn sin in tho nine wny lies chiefly In tho fact that it does not simu- ¬ dations tects in view of its steel framo and Its and higher standard of construction and In the future an the first class houses In alze This has been true too in spite these architects say buildings having solid masonry of steel The owners of the buildings havehowover costly and elaborate interior furnishings decoration been established Whether the enerall want till the late Its frame has badly enough general re- ¬ is imposed by Is high I superior accommodations of the fact that tho tendency the general appearance of n column with- is not openly disclosed but some of the found that there a limit It twentytwo stories and built This advance is represented chiefly in ¬ i to increased hill as undoubt- cently has been to minimize external art a heavy base a long central shaft and a metal columns are permitted to show in thn sentimental nature of tho office oc- ¬ mostly of granite the erection of the St Regis Hotel at Fifth edly will do in New York Is something that in the skyscraper and produce a building decorated capital What they would have tho facade cupant and that there are few who rare Some idea of Its massiveness can be got avenue and Fiftyfifth street although only will disclose BASY GRAFT OF THE MEDIUMS John In tho spirit world shows up at the Homo of Truth Circle people who have what they call the psychic and in ease the method was the I a hundred mechanical devices and secrets TilE TELLING STROKE If the owner of tho glove has a John b Mrs Koakom the second they can pick a some The cabinet is hung with black for the use of mediums Prices run from 1 i lady is told right a mile and covered in front n to 00 npxgmrs among tho departed the medium sends sight wonder the old curtain tl Point of the Tale That Won
Recommended publications
  • Second Annual Report 1934

    Second Annual Report 1934

    74th Congress, 1st Session House Document No: 31 SECOND ANNUAL REPORT of the FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK BOARD covering operations of the FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS THE HOME OWNERS' LOAN CORPORATION THE FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN DIVISION FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN INSURANCE CORPORATION from the date of their creation through December 31, 1934 FEBRUARY 14, 1935.-Referred to the Committee on Banking and Currency and ordered to be printed with illustration UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1935 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK BOARD, Washington, February 11, 195. SIR: Pursuant to the requirements of section 20 of the Federal Home Loan Bank Act, we have the honor to submit herewith the second annual report of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board covering operations for the year 1934 (a) of the Federal Home Loan Banks, (b) the Home Owners' Loan Corporation, (c) the Federal Savings and Loan Division, and (d) the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation from organization to December 31, 1934. JOHN H. FAHEY, Chairman. T. D. WEBB, W. F. STEVENSON, FRED W. CATLETT, H. E. HOAGLAND, Members. THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. iM Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis SECOND ANNUAL REPORT OF THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK BOARD ON THE OPERATIONS OF THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK SYSTEM FOR THE YEAR 1934 When the Federal Home Loan Bank System closed its 1933 opera tions December 31 it had 2,086 members, consisting mostly of building and loan, homestead associations, and cooperative banks who had subscribed for stock in the Corporation to the amount of $10,908,300.
  • The Configuration of the Rock Floor of Greater New York

    The Configuration of the Rock Floor of Greater New York

    Bulletin No. 270 . Series B, Descriptive Geology, 73 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. VVALCOTT, DIHECTOK THE CONFIGURATION OF THE ROCK FLOOR OF GREATER NEW YORK BY WILLIAM HERBERT HOBBS WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT. PRINTING OFFICE 1905 CONTENTS. Page. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL .................................................. 7 PART I. STRUCTURAL STUDIES ............................................. .9 Introduction......................................................... 9 Aids to geological studies on Manhattan Island..................... 9 Engineering enterprises that have pierced the rock floor............ 10 Keview of structural geological studies of the New York City area.... 12 Boroughs of Manhattan and the Bronx ........................ 12 Gale .................................................... 12 Mather.................................................. 12 Cozzens ................................................. 12 Stevens.................................................. 12 Credner................................................. 13 Newberry ............................................... 13 Dana.................................................... 14 Russell.................................................. 14 Kemp ................................................... 14 Merrill .................................................. 15 Eckel ................................................... 16 Gratacap ................................................ '16 Julien ..................... i.............................
  • Civic Classicism in New York City's Architecture

    Civic Classicism in New York City's Architecture

    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2-2014 Apotheosis of the Public Realm: Civic Classicism in New York City's Architecture Paul Andrija Ranogajec Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/96 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] APOTHEOSIS OF THE PUBLIC REALM: CIVIC CLASSICISM IN NEW YORK CITY’S ARCHITECTURE by PAUL ANDRIJA RANOGAJEC M.A., University of Virginia, 2005 B.Arch., University of Notre Dame, 2003 A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Art History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The City University of New York 2014 © 2014 PAUL ANDRIJA RANOGAJEC All Rights Reserved ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Art History in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date Kevin D. Murphy, Chair of Examining Committee Date Claire Bishop, Executive Officer, Ph.D. Program in Art History Rosemarie Haag Bletter Sally Webster Carol Krinsky Supervision Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii Abstract Apotheosis of the Public Realm: Civic Classicism in New York City’s Architecture by Paul Andrija Ranogajec Adviser: Kevin D. Murphy In the years around the consolidation of Greater New York in 1898, a renewed interest in republican political theory among progressive liberals coincided with a new kind of civic architecture.

  • 26 Broadway (Aka 10-30 Broadway, 1-11 Beaver Street, and 73-81 New Street), Manhattan

    Landmarks Preservation Commission September 19, 1995, Designation List 266 LP-1930 STANDARD OIL BUILDING, 26 Broadway (aka 10-30 Broadway, 1-11 Beaver Street, and 73-81 New Street), Manhattan. Designed 1920; built 1921-1928; architects Carrère & Hastings; Shreve, Lamb & Blake, associate architects. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 22, Lot 13. On May 16, 1995, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Standard Oil Building and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 5). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Eleven witnesses spoke in favor of designation, including Councilwoman Kathryn Freed and representatives of State Senator Catherine Abate, the New York Chapter of the American Institute of Architects, the Municipal Art Society, the New York Landmarks Conservancy, the Fine Arts Federation, and the Seaport Task Force of Community Board 1. No one spoke in opposition to designation. A representative of the owner attended the hearing but took no position regarding the proposed designation. The Commission has received several letters and other statements in support of designation including a resolution from Community Board 1. Summary The Standard Oil Building, largely erected between 1921 and 1926 and finally completed in 1928, incorporates the company's original building (built in 1884-85 and enlarged in 1895). Designed by Thomas Hastings of the architectural firm of Carrère & Hastings, with Shreve, Lamb & Blake as associated architects, the building is notable for its distinctive tower, one of the southernmost spires in the Manhattan skyline, and the sweeping curve of the Broadway facade, which is punctuated by the arched openings of the main entrance portal and flanking large windows that dominate the street wall as it fronts Bowling Green.
  • CUNARD BUILDING, 25 Broadway (Aka 13-27 Broadway, 13-39 Greenwich Street, and 1-9- Morris Street), Manhattan

    CUNARD BUILDING, 25 Broadway (Aka 13-27 Broadway, 13-39 Greenwich Street, and 1-9- Morris Street), Manhattan

    Landmarks Preservation Commission September 19, 1995; Designation List 266 LP-1928 CUNARD BUILDING, 25 Broadway (aka 13-27 Broadway, 13-39 Greenwich Street, and 1-9- Morris Street), Manhattan. Designed 1917-19; built 1920-21. Benjamin Wistar Morris, architect, and Carrere & Hastings, consulting architects. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 13 , Lot 27. On May 16, 1995, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation of the Cunard Building and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 3) . The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law . Eleven witnesses spoke in favor of designation, including Councilwoman Kathryn Freed and representatives of State Senator Catherine Abate, the New York Chapter of the American Institute of Architects, the Municipal Art Society, the New York Landmarks Conservancy, the Fine Arts Federation, and the Seaport Task Force of Community Board 1. No one spoke in opposition to designation. A representative of the owner attended the hearing but took no position regarding the proposed designation. The Commission has received several letters and other statements in support of designation including a resolution from Community Board 1. Summary Located at the head of of the varied spaces within, Bowling Green and and two loggia-like extending through the elements of the central block to Greenwich Street, section, which visually the twenty-two-story balance the slightly Cunard Building is among projecting end pavilions. lower Manhattan's most The judiciously employed architecturally and nautical iconographic historically significant program of Rochette & edifices. It was designed Parzin i is an in 1917-19 by Benjamin acknowledgment of the Wistar Morris, a talented client and principal architect who received occupant of the building, much critical acclaim for the Cunard Steamship Line his scheme.
  • Architectural Record Was Devoted to Be Asserted of Any of the Embodiments the Work of Messrs

    Architectural Record Was Devoted to Be Asserted of Any of the Embodiments the Work of Messrs

    VOL. XX. No. 3. SEPTEMBER, 1906 WHOLE No. 96. mulinn The Work of Messrs. McKIM, MEAD & WHITE Illustrated 153 HENRY W. DESMOND, HERBERT CROLY Notes and Comments Illustrated 247 Resolutions on the Death of Stanford White The Church and the Architect Planning the Church Yard A Restoration Enthusiasm and Good Sense Public Art League New York's Big Buildings Effective Building Sites in New York An Extraordinary Record Ecclesiastical Architecture Social Service in Small Parks C. W. SWEET, Publisher E.W. REINHOLD, Business Mgr. H.W. DESMOND, Editor H. D. CROLY, Associate Editor Subscription (Yearly), $3.00 Published Monthly OF PUBLICATION: Nos. 14 and 16 VESEY STREET, NEW YORK CITY WESTERN OFFICE: 511 IVONAONOCK BLOC., CHICAGO, ILL. Cbe Vol. XX SEPTEMBER, 19O6 No. 3. The Work of Messrs. McKim, Mead & White In the about eleven of year 1895, just ume the work testified sufficiently to years an entire number of the its ago, popularity, if, indeed, popularity can Architectural Record was devoted to be asserted of any of the embodiments the work of Messrs. McKim, Mead & of an art which in this country evokes White. that At time the firm had been so little genuine popular understanding in active for some fifteen or practice years ; general popular appreciation. At all and its work was already distinguished events their names were more frequent- among that of contemporary American ly than that of any other firm in the THE NEW PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD STATION BIRD'S-EYE VIEW. Seventh to Ninth Avenues, 31st to 33d Streets, New York. architectural firms at once for its va- mouths of people who had no commer- riety, its volume, and for a certain dis- cial or technical interest in architec- tinctive character.

  • Toronto's Edwardian Skyscraper

    REPORTS | RAPPORTS TORONTO’S EDWARDIAN SKYSCRAPER ROW DAVID WINTERTON is a graduate of the University > DAVID E. WINTERTON of Toronto and McGill University. He is currently a Senior Associate at Robert A.M. Stern Architects (RAMSA) in New York. Previously he worked at the Toronto heritage architecture firm ERA Architects where he deepened his knowledge and admiration his paper will investigate exem- of the architectural history of Toronto and of his Tplars of commercial architecture birthplace, southwestern Ontario. He continues from Toronto’s prolific early twentieth- century building period (1900 to 1916), to cultivate that interest and focuses his ongoing often referred to stylistically in Canada research on the rich material culture of the early as Edwardian,1 through two lenses. The twentieth century in the Great Lakes region. introduction of the skyscraper—that most American of built form—to Toronto’s flourishing new banking district is the first lens. That story aims to unravel the influ- ences on Toronto architecture emanating from Chicago (through technological advances in commercial architecture), New York (where Beaux-Arts rules were stretched to compose tall building façades), and London (through adher- ence to Imperial architectural taste). The second lens considers two contemporary, competing architectural practices that succeeded in tall building design: Carrère and Hastings of New York (in association with their Canadian alumni) and Darling and Pearson of Toronto. Toronto’s first modern skyscraper2 ensem- ble appears at the intersection of King and Yonge streets in the years after the Great Fire of 1904. These new buildings inalter- ably changed the skyline image of the city3 and were erected in spite of pervasive health and engineering concerns,4 not to mention aesthetic ones.
  • Of Sites – by Location

    Of Sites – by Location

    Index of Sites – by Location Albany Street 4-14 Albany St. (W New York Downtown, Hotel & Residences) Extant Tour 4 Section 1 (2) 4-14 Albany Street (National Surety Company Building) Demolished Tour 4 Section 1 (B} 11 Albany Street Demolished Tour 4 Section 1 (A} 16-26 Albany Street (Public School 29) Demolished Tour 4 Section 1 (C} Ann Street 2 to 30 Ann Street Demolished Tour 6 Section 2 (E) 25-29 Ann Street (Edgar House) Extant Tour 9 Section 2 (13) 57-61 Ann Street (Parking Garage) Extant Tour 9 Section 2 (14) 85, 87, 89, 91 Ann Street Demolished Tour 9 Section 2 (HH) Barclay Street 1½ Barclay Street (Gamewell Fire Alarm Telegraph Company) Demolished Tour 11 Section 1 (D) 6-16 Barclay Street (Barclay Tower Building) Extant Tour 11 Section 1 (7) 8 to 16 Barclay Street Demolished Tour 11 Section 1 (C) 21 Barclay Street Demolished Tour 11 Section 1 (E) 21-23 Barclay Street (F. A. Ringles & Company Building) Demolished Tour 11 Section 1 (H) 22 Barclay Street (St. Peter’s Church) Extant Tour 11 Section 1 (6) 23-41 Barclay Street (Four Seasons Hotel New York Downtown) Extant Tour 11 Section 1 (10) 30-32 and 34 Barclay Street Demolished Tour 11 Section 1 (B) 41 Barclay Street Demolished Tour 11 Section 1 (G) 49-51 Barclay Street Demolished Tour 11 Section 1 (I) 53 Barclay Street (Daprato Stationary Company) Demolished Tour 11 Section 1 (J) 75 Barclay Street Demolished Tour 11 Section 1 (K) 76 Barclay Street (J. Halls Segar Manufactory) Demolished Tour 12 Section 2 (U) 81 Barclay Street Demolished Tour 12 Section 2 (X) 93 Barclay Street Demolished Tour 12 Section 2 (W) 101 Barclay Street) (Bank of N.
  • Index of Sites – Alphabetically by Name

    Index of Sites – Alphabetically by Name

    Index of Sites – Alphabetically by Name A Adams Express Company Building (57-61 Broadway) Extant Tour 1 Section 1(6) Alberti Building (50-52Pine Street) Extant Tour 2 (39) Aldrich Building (102 Chambers and 32 Warren Streets) Demolished Tour 11 Section 2 (F) Aldrich Court Building (42-45 Broadway) Demolished Tour 3 (D) All American Cable Company Building (85-89 Broad Street) Demolished Tour 5 Section 2 (Z) American Bank Note Company Building (70 Broad Street) Extant Tour 2 (11) American Bank Note Company Building (78-86 Trinity Place) Demolished Tour 1, Section 2 (F) American Bureau of Shipping (43-47 Broad Street) Demolished Tour 2 (A) American Exchange National Bank Building (128-132 Broadway) Demolished Tour 4 Section 2 (C) American Express Company Building (65 Broadway) Demolished Tour 1, Section 1 (5) American Express Company Building (63-65 Broadway) Extant Tour 1 Section 1 (5) American International Group (AIG) Building (66-76 Pine Street) Extant Tour 2 (42) American News Company Building (37-41 Chambers Street) Demolished Tour 10 Section 1 (J) American Sugar Refining Co. Building (114-120 Wall Street) Extant Tour 7 (11) American Surety Company Building (96-100 Broadway) Extant Tour 1 Section 1 (1) American Telephone & Telegraph Building (193-207 Broadway) Extant Tour 6 Section 1 (1) American Tract Society Building (150 Nassau Street) Extant Tour 9 Section 2 (19) Amsinck Building (90-96 Wall Street) Demolished Tour 7 (L) Anchor Packing Company (103 Maiden Lane) Demolished Tour 8 Section 2 (Y) Anderson Building (12-16 John Street) Extant Tour 6 Section 2 (19) John Anderson & Company Building (114-118 Liberty Street) Demolished Tour 4 Section 1 (T) Ansonia Brass & Copper Company (19-21 Cliff Street) Demolished Tour 8 Section 2 (B) S.
  • ¨§¦76 ¨§¦77 ¨§¦74 ¨§¦90 ¨§¦75 ¨§¦71 ¨§¦70 ¨§¦80

    ¨§¦76 ¨§¦77 ¨§¦74 ¨§¦90 ¨§¦75 ¨§¦71 ¨§¦70 ¨§¦80

    FEDERAL HISTORIC TAX CREDIT PROJECTS Ohio A total of 1,382 Federal Historic Tax Credit projects (certified by the National Park Service) and $956,242,856 in Federal Historic Tax Credits between fiscal year 2001 through 2020, leveraged an estimated $5,498,396,423 in total development. Data source: National Park Service, 2020 Ashtabula2 ¦¨§90 Mentor Painesville ¦¨§475 73Toledo Cleveland East Cleveland 280 4 Maumee ¦¨§ 229 Chardon 7 Lorain4 2 Berea Shaker Materials Sandusky Amherst 2 Heights Park 80 Elyria ¦¨§ Cuyahoga Oberlin Warren Falls Hudson 2 Tiffin 7 2 2Ravenna 2 9 Medina 21 Kent Campbell Findlay4 ¦¨§76 Akron Youngstown17 Barberton Rittman 2 Alliance Canton4 Lima3 Wooster Galion Mansfield Kenton 2 Celina ¦¨§71 Wellsville 2 77 East St. Mary's ¦¨§ Liverpool 2 75 2 ¦¨§ Mount Vernon Dennison Delaware3 Steubenville Orange Township Granville St. Piqua Clairsville Worthington Westerville 9 6 Newark 2 Springfield Columbus388 Bexley 2 70 Cambridge Bellaire West Milton 6 ¦¨§ Hayesville Zanesville London Columbia Dayton23 Fairborn Eaton Lancaster 4 ¦¨§675 Centerville Circleville New Hamilton Wilmington Washington Straitsville 2 Court House Nelsonville Marietta5 11 Lebanon 3 Springfield Twsp. 2 Chillicothe Athens ¦¨§74 Hillsboro 458 ¦¨§275 Cincinnati Peebles Gallipolis 5 Portsmouth 2 Ironton Federal Historic Tax Credit Projects 1 6 - 10 0 15 30 60 Miles R 2 - 5 11 and over Provided by the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the Historic Tax Credit Coalition For more information, contact Shaw Sprague, NTHP Vice President for Government
  • STANDARD OIL BUILDING, 26 Broadway (Aka 10-30 Broadway, 1-11 Beaver Street, and 73-81 New Street), Manhattan

    STANDARD OIL BUILDING, 26 Broadway (Aka 10-30 Broadway, 1-11 Beaver Street, and 73-81 New Street), Manhattan

    Landmarks Preservation Commission September 19, 1995, Designation List 266 LP-1930 STANDARD OIL BUILDING, 26 Broadway (aka 10-30 Broadway, 1-11 Beaver Street, and 73-81 New Street), Manhattan. Designed 1920; built 1921-1928; architects Carrere & Hastings; Shreve, Lamb & Blake, associate architects. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 22, Lot 13. On May 16, 1995, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Standard Oil Building and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 5). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Eleven witnesses spoke in favor of designation, including Councilwoman Kathryn Freed and representatives of State Senator Catherine Abate, the New York Chapter of the American Institute of Architects, the Municipal Art Society, the New York Landmarks Conservancy, the Fine Arts Federation, and the Seaport Task Force of Community Board 1. No one spoke in opposition to designation. A representative of the owner attended the hearing but took no position regarding the proposed designation. The Commission has received several letters and other statements in support of designation including a resolution from Community Board 1. Summary The Standard Oil Building, largely erected between 1921 and 1926 and finally completed in 1928, incorporates the company's original building (built in 1884-85 and enlarged in 1895). Designed by Thomas Hastings of the architectural firm of Carrere & Hastings, with Shreve, Lamb & Blake as associated architects, the building is notable for its distinctive tower, one of the southernmost spires in the Manhattan skyline, and the sweeping curve of the Broadway facade, which is punctuated by the arched openings of the main entrance portal and flanking large windows that dominate the street wall as it fronts Bowling Green.
  • A New Index of the American Stock Exchange

    A New Index of the American Stock Exchange

    A New Index of the American Stock Exchange The American Stock Exchange has been a secondary exchange for stocks that were unable or unwilling to list on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Many stocks that could not meet the listing requirements for the NYSE listed on the American Stock Exchange (AMEX) in the hope that eventually they would “graduate” to the NYSE. Only a handful of AMEX stocks were ever part of the S&P 500 Composite, but many of the stocks that graduated from the AMEX to the NYSE eventually became a member of the S&P 500 Composite while on the NYSE. Today, the American Stock Exchange is owned by the NYSE and is known as the NYSE American. Because of its secondary nature, the AMEX has generally been ignored by investors, but this article attempts to redress that neglect. Curbside Trading The Curb began during the Civil War on the street just outside the NYSE. Open to all, anyone could show up to buy and sell stocks that were not listed on the NYSE. In the 1860s, rain or shine, the curb opened at 8am and operated until 6pm in William Street between Exchange Place and Beaver Street. Between 1869 and 1881, the open-air market included two other units, the New York Mining Stock Exchange and the Petroleum Consolidated Stock Exchange. During the 1890s, the Curb operated in front of the Mills Building at the corner of 15 Broad Street and Wall Street. The Curb relocated to Blair Building in 1907 at 44 Broad Street, just south of Exchange Place where it remained until the building at Trinity Place was opened in 1921.