DOCSLIB.ORG

The Conservative Caucus, Inc. Supporters Throughout the United

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Conservative Caucus, Inc. Supporters Throughout the United The Conservative Caucus,Inc. National Headquartars ^50 Maple Avenue East, Vienna, Virginia 22180 (703) 393-15: HOWARD PHILLIPS' REMARKS AT THE HAYDEN-FONDA PRESS CONFERENCE, SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA, iVlAY 24, 1982. Good morning. My name is Howard Phillips. I am National Director of The Conservative Caucus, which is a non-partisan, grass roots lobbying organization, with roughly 400,000 supporters throughout the United States. We have been involved over the years in a number of issues. For example, in 1977 and 1978, we helped organize the nationwide campaign against ratification of the Carter-Torrijos Panama Canal Surrender Treaty. In 1979 and 1980 we led the nationwide, fifty state campaign against ratification of Salt II. Currently, we are focusing considerable emphasis on a campaign which we call "Defunding the Left." We agree with Thomas Jefferson that it is sinful and tyrannical to compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors. We believe that the principle incorporated in the First Amendment which says that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion and which has been interpreted to mean that religious faiths ought not be subsidized, carries with it the implicit understanding that political faiths, likewise, ought not be subsidized. But, the fact of the matter is that, since the early 1960s, when many programs of the Great Society were instituted, literally billions of dollars in Federal funds have been used to underwrite the activities of organizations which have political axes to grind. In his State of the Union message earlier this year. President Reagan pointed out that, whereas in 1960 some $7 billion from the Federal treasury went to subsidize categorical grant programs, that number was in the neighborhood of $100 billion by the time he took office. In 1960 you had something under 200 different types of categorical grant programs, but today you have more than 500 such programs. We are here in Santa Monica today because some of the groups which have, over the years, received funding from the Federal treasury, at taxpayer expense, and which fall into this category of political activism, are groups which have been allied with Tom Hayden and Jane Fonda: groups like the Laurel Springs Institute, groups like the Citizen/Labor Energy Coalition and a number of others. Board of Directors Executive Director Director of Research Publications Howard Philhos Cdair.-ran F .Andy fdessirg. Jr and Publications Senate Issues Yearaook Peter J. Thomas, Secretary 3uS3" E, Prri ijtps Senaie Reoon Lawrence J. Straw. Jr. Treasurer Administrative Vice Chairman 3rass Roots Richard Derham Charles Orndor'f National Security Task Force Member s Reocrt J A.an ivtacKay 3rig Sen A'bion Knight. JSA Re' Ar.njat Reoort Field Coordinator Co'iser.'dtr.'e Manifesto National Director Monroe Thomas HO'/rard Philips Page 2 We believe that it is wrong for groups of this kind, whether or not they are associated with Tom Hayden and Jane Fonda, to receive funding. We think it is wrong for politically active groups, whether they are liberal or conservative, to receive political funding. We object to the fact, for example, that the Department of Education, in 1981, extended an additional several hundred thousand dollars worth of funding to the Rev. Jesse Jackson through Operation PUSH-EXCEL. We would be just as critical if it were the case, which it is not, that Federal funds were going to underwrite the Rev. Jerry Falwell or his Moral Majority. At a time when President Reagan has proposed the largest budget deficits in the history of our republic, deficits which, in the opinion of Rudolph Penner of the American Enterprise Institute could, over the next four years, reach some $875 billion, it is important to rally the American people in support of cuts in non-defense spending so that they do not reach the flawed conclusion that the only way to balance the budget is by raising taxes. President Reagan will be in Los Angeles tomorrow evening, as you know, and I hope that he will, while he is here, perhaps from your accounts, perhaps from the accounts of other Californians upset about the ways in which Federal funds have been used, determine to make a change in the policy of his Administration. Just this past Friday I met briefly with David Stockman, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, to express my concern about a memorandum which David Stockman issued for heads of Federal departments and agencies on April 26, 1982. A copy of that memorandum is attached to the press release which is in the press kit. If you read the fine print in that memorandum, while it includes some language which we support, the bottom line is, "political advocacy groups may continue to receive grant and contract awards." We think this is an outrage. We think that President Reagan should personally intervene to do something about it and we think that there are some specific steps which any Administration ought to be called upon to take by the American public to deal with this problem. The first very simple step is for the President to require each department head and cabinet secretary to name a key person in each department and agency who has final responsibility for sign-off on discretionery grants and contracts. Second, a training program should be instituted so that people in the Reagan Administration are able to deal with the procedures and regulations that have been developed and locked-in over a period, in some cases, of 18 or 20 years. We Page 3 believe it is important for tbe communications officials of each department and agency to bring to public attention the facts about how this money is being used. We think the President should encourage men like Senator Orrin Hatch, the Chairman of the Labor and Human Resources Committee in the U.S. Senate, and Senator William Roth of Delaware, the Chairman of the Government Operations Committee, to hold oversight hearings, calling attention to the inappropriate uses of public funds. We think that the Freedom of Information Act should be extended so that non-profit organizations which receive Federal grants and/or contracts are subject to the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, which in many cases, is not now the case. We think that, wherever possible. Federal dollars, so long as categorical programs of this kind remain, should be issued by contract rather than by grant. We think there should be standardized government grant and contract procedures government-wide and we think there should be cross-referencing, so that people in the Department of Health and Human Services, for example, will know when a particular grant recipient is also applying for money from the Department of Education or the Department of Housing and Urban Development. We think as a matter of course, members of Congress should be given detailed information about the grants and contracts going into their Congressional Districts. We want to avoid the kind of situation which has occurred in the past where grants going to one organization have been laundered through to other organizations. One example of this is the Youth Project, which during the reign of Miss Marge Tabankin at the ACTION agency, received funds, some of which were delegated to the Institute for Policy Studies. So, that is basically our message this morning. While we have a concern for and a strong disagreement with the many organizations that receive Federal funds, we also have a disagreement with the Reagan Administration which has failed to take the actions available to it to correct the situation, which is an outrage and a national disgrace. I'd be pleased to answer your questions. QUESTION; Would you please tell me what your group thinks should be subsidized, outside of defense spending - military spending? HOWARD PHILLIPS: Well, you can make a case for subsidizing a whole variety of Page 4 things. I think it is easier to narrow the issue by saying that there is a distinction to be drawn, as the Supreme Court has done, with respect to aid to parochial schools in the area of education, between funding hardware on the one hand and, on the other hand, funding the propagation of ideas. There is something very wrong when you cannot control political decision making in a free society, either through the market place of ideas or at the ballot box. When members of Congress delegate policy setting functions to people in the judiciary and the bureaucracy, they are denying the rights of citizens who expect to be able to hold those members of Congress accountable for their votes. QUESTION; Could you give me examples of what your group would be in favor of subsidizing, outside of military spending? HOWARD PHILLIPS: Well, for example, we believe that the Federal government does have a responsibility, as set forth in the Constitution, to provide for the common defense, promote domestic tranquility, provide for the general welfare, etc. By and large, the purpose of the Federal government is limited to those functions specifically assigned to it, with the rest remaining to the states. We think welfare is not a proper Federal function. We think that defense is. We think that in some cases, in terms of Federal enclaves, there are certain types of construction expenditures which would be appropriate. But, by and large, we would say that the burden of proof would be on the Federal government to argue that an area of expenditure is appropriate, rather than on the citizenry to argue that it is not. QUESTION: Do you feel that all the groups listed in this magazine, the 30 liberal groups, and those others that do probably receive Federal funding are inappropriate for such? HOWARD PHILLIPS; Indeed, we do, because they have a politically activist character.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • College Faces $500,000 Budget Deficit
    A Student UTER Publication Linn-Benlon Community College, Albany, ~on VOLUME 21 • NUMBER 7 Wednesday, Nov. 15, 1989 Winter term registration cards ready By Bev Thomas Of The Commuter Fully-admitted students who are cur- rently attending LHCC have first grab at classes during early registration for winter term providing they pick up an appoint- ment card, said LHCC Registar Sue Cripe. Appointment cards will be available at the registration counter Nov. 20 through Dec. 4. Registration counter hours are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. Appointment registration days are as follows: students with last names H through 0, Tuesday, Dec. 5; last names P through Z, Wednesday, Dec. 6; last names A through G, Thursday, Dec. 7. Students who miss appointments, lose appointment cards or don't pick cards up may-still register early on Dec. 8, Dec. II or they may attend open registration beginning Dec. 12. Returning Evening Degree Program students may register from 7 to 8 p.m. On The COmmuler! JESS REF!; Dec. I, during open registration or by ap- pointment as a continuing fully-admitted Saluting Women Veterans student. Nursing student Carolyn Camden and Student Council Moderator Brian McMullen ride the ASLBCC float in Satur- Part-time student registration begins day's annual Albany Veterans Day Parade. Although the float was beaten out by one constructed by Calapooia Dec. 12 and Community Education Middle School for best in the parade, ASLBCC's entry did win recognition in its category. The LB float is an an. registration for credit and non-credit nual project constructed with the assistance of several campus clubs.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Right
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1984 The New Right Elizabeth Julia Reiley College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Reiley, Elizabeth Julia, "The New Right" (1984). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625286. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-mnnb-at94 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE NEW RIGHT 'f A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Sociology The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Elizabeth Reiley 1984 This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Elizabeth Approved, May 1984 Edwin H . Rhyn< Satoshi Ito Dedicated to Pat Thanks, brother, for sharing your love, your life, and for making us laugh. We feel you with us still. Presente! iii. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................... v ABSTRACT.................................... vi INTRODUCTION ................................ s 1 CHAPTER I. THE NEW RIGHT . '............ 6 CHAPTER II. THE 1980 ELECTIONS . 52 CHAPTER III. THE PRO-FAMILY COALITION . 69 CHAPTER IV. THE NEW RIGHT: BEYOND 1980 95 CHAPTER V. CONCLUSION ............... 114 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................. 130 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer wishes to express her appreciation to all the members of her committee for the time they gave to the reading and criticism of the manuscript, especially Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the New Right on the Reagan Administration
    LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS UNIVERSITY OF LONDON THE IMPACT OF THE NEW RIGHT ON THE REAGAN ADMINISTRATION: KIRKPATRICK & UNESCO AS. A TEST CASE BY Isaac Izy Kfir LONDON 1998 UMI Number: U148638 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U148638 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 2 ABSTRACT The aim of this research is to investigate whether the Reagan administration was influenced by ‘New Right’ ideas. Foreign policy issues were chosen as test cases because the presidency has more power in this area which is why it could promote an aggressive stance toward the United Nations and encourage withdrawal from UNESCO with little impunity. Chapter 1 deals with American society after 1945. It shows how the ground was set for the rise of Reagan and the New Right as America moved from a strong affinity with New Deal liberalism to a new form of conservatism, which the New Right and Reagan epitomised. Chapter 2 analyses the New Right as a coalition of three distinctive groups: anti-liberals, New Christian Right, and neoconservatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H12183
    September 30, 1996 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE H12183 Mr. DE LA GARZA. I yield to the gen- try's service following his reserve mili- SAM JOHNSON of Dallas, standing tleman from New Mexico. tary service. right here, Mr. Speaker, said some in- Mr. RICHARDSON. Mr. Speaker, let Mr. Speaker, I thought that the U.S. credible words to me: I never did give me just say that selflessly the gen- Senate might move more swiftly on them what they wanted. tleman from Texas has talked about Friday last and that we might adjourn Then he said, you know, because this somebody else when in effect this may sine die on Friday, the 27th of Septem- is typical of his humility, all human be the last speech that truly one of the ber. Then there would have been no beings are different. He slapped me on giants in the Congress, the gentleman special orders. We would have gone out the back of my hand. He said, some from Texas, will be giving. sine die. My high school Latin tells me people you do that to them and they Mr. Speaker, I will ask unanimous that means done, no further legislative caved. We actually had two officers consent that the gentleman's speech to action, House and Senate are gone, tra- who were full traitors who collaborated the Congressional Hispanic Caucus be ditional call from the White House to with the enemy their entire captivity part of the RECORD of this proceeding, the leader of the Senate, Mr. TRENT without ever having been tortured.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Poll Charts Presidential Preferences
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana University of Montana News Releases, 1928, 1956-present University Relations 11-3-1995 Montana poll charts presidential preferences University of Montana--Missoula. Office of University Relations Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/newsreleases Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation University of Montana--Missoula. Office of University Relations, "Montana poll charts presidential preferences" (1995). University of Montana News Releases, 1928, 1956-present. 13897. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/newsreleases/13897 This News Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University Relations at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Montana News Releases, 1928, 1956-present by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Montana University Communications NEWS RELEASE Missoula; MT 59812 (406) 243-2522 This release is available electronically on INN (News Net). Nov. 3, 1995 MONTANA POLL CHARTS PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCES MISSOULA ~ Senator Bob Dole is an early favorite with Montana Republicans, but many remain undecided. And many Montanans like the idea of a major independent or third party candidate in the 1996 presidential race, according to the latest Montana Poll. For this edition of the Montana Poll, 411 adult Montanans were polled statewide September 21-26. The poll is conducted by The University of Montana Bureau of Business and Economic Research. Choosing from a crowded field of 11 Republican presidential candidates at the time of the poll, Montanans overall endorsed Bob Dole most often (28 percent), with 34 percent undecided, said Susan Selig Wallwork, director of the Montana Poll.
    [Show full text]
  • Thank You President Trump
    Thank You President Trump conservativeactionproject.com/thank-you-president-trump/ January 13, 2020 January 13, 2020 Washington, DC Dear President Trump, On behalf of the conservative movement, we would like to thank you for the accomplishments your administration has achieved on behalf of the American people. From a booming economy, to stronger protections at the border, to implementing strong protections for the unborn, to nominating constitutionalist judges to the federal bench, you have kept your promises to the voters that elected you. Specifically, we want to applaud you for the following achievements: A booming economy that has unemployment at its lowest level in fifty years, the highest median household income on record, a labor force that has grown by 2.1 million. 1/11 Poverty rates for African Americans, Asian Americans, and Hispanic Americans at record lows, and unemployment among women is at its lowest level in nearly 70 years. Aggressively working to address the opioid crisis. Signing the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act of 2017 which resulted in more than 6 million American works receiving wage increases, bonuses, and increased benefits. Rolling back nearly 8 regulations for every significant new one and cutting regulatory costs by more than $50 billion. Repealing two particularly onerous regulations: the Obama-era Waters of the U.S. rule, and the Obama-era “Clean Power” Plan, and revoking California’s emissions waiver, all of which cost Americans millions of dollars and thousands of jobs. Withdrawing America from the Paris climate treaty, which saved American families $20,000 a year. Opening up federal lands and offshore areas to fossil fuel development and permitting the pipelines and infrastructure necessary to facilitate further development.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Movement
    Conservative Movement How did the conservative movement, routed in Barry Goldwater's catastrophic defeat to Lyndon Johnson in the 1964 presidential campaign, return to elect its champion Ronald Reagan just 16 years later? What at first looks like the political comeback of the century becomes, on closer examination, the product of a particular political moment that united an unstable coalition. In the liberal press, conservatives are often portrayed as a monolithic Right Wing. Close up, conservatives are as varied as their counterparts on the Left. Indeed, the circumstances of the late 1980s -- the demise of the Soviet Union, Reagan's legacy, the George H. W. Bush administration -- frayed the coalition of traditional conservatives, libertarian advocates of laissez-faire economics, and Cold War anti- communists first knitted together in the 1950s by William F. Buckley Jr. and the staff of the National Review. The Reagan coalition added to the conservative mix two rather incongruous groups: the religious right, primarily provincial white Protestant fundamentalists and evangelicals from the Sunbelt (defecting from the Democrats since the George Wallace's 1968 presidential campaign); and the neoconservatives, centered in New York and led predominantly by cosmopolitan, secular Jewish intellectuals. Goldwater's campaign in 1964 brought conservatives together for their first national electoral effort since Taft lost the Republican nomination to Eisenhower in 1952. Conservatives shared a distaste for Eisenhower's "modern Republicanism" that largely accepted the welfare state developed by Roosevelt's New Deal and Truman's Fair Deal. Undeterred by Goldwater's defeat, conservative activists regrouped and began developing institutions for the long haul.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Representatives 1437 1996 T82.18
    1996 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES T82.18 Nussle Sanford Thomas So the motion to lay the resolution on D-day, the night before. It was Packard Saxton Thornberry Parker Scarborough Tiahrt on the table was agreed to. about my 200th speech. The gentleman Paxon Schaefer Torkildsen A motion to reconsider the vote from Wisconsin [Mr. GUNDERSON] has Peterson (MN) Schiff Traficant whereby said motion was agreed to made about seven, eight speeches in 16 Petri Seastrand Upton was, by unanimous consent, laid on the years. I am about to break 200 tonight, Pombo Sensenbrenner Vucanovich Porter Shadegg Walker table. I think, warning about the spread of Pryce Shaw Walsh T the world's greatest health problem, at Quillen Shays Wamp 82.18 POINT OF PERSONAL PRIVILEGE least in this country, particularly be- Quinn Shuster Watts (OK) Mr. DORNAN rose to a question of Radanovich Skeen Weldon (FL) cause it involves young men in the Ramstad Smith (MI) Weller personal privilege. prime of their lives. Regula Smith (NJ) White The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. ``This is from a young man dying of Riggs Smith (WA) Whitfield LAHOOD, pursuant to clause 1 of rule AIDS. His name is John R. Gail, Jr. He Roberts Solomon Wicker IX, recognized Mr. DORNAN for one Rogers Souder Wolf is from Centerville, OH. It says: hour. Rohrabacher Spence Young (AK) `Mr. Dornan, I caught your speech on Mr. DORNAN made the following Ros-Lehtinen Stearns Young (FL) AIDS yesterday over C±SPAN. I must Roth Stump Zeliff statement: Roukema Talent Zimmer ``Mr. Speaker, I will be showing no commend you.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservative Caucus. Inc
    The Conservative Caucus.Inc. National Headquarters 450 Maple Avenue East, Vienna, Virginia 22180 (703) 893-1550 i-r July 30, 1982 MEMORANDUM FOR ANDY MESSING30 xr FROM: HOWARD PHILLIPS Please check with Phyllis Schlafly to see whether she thinks it is a good idea for us to proceed with the Stop E.R.A. Action-Gram mailing proposed to us by The Viguerie Company. I do not care one way or the other. If Phyllis thinks it would be a plus, we will do it. If she thinks it would be a minus, we will not. Please advise. Thank you. HP:cj Board of Directors Executive Director National Security Task Force Publications Howard Phillips, Chairman F. Andy Messing, Jr. Brig, General Albion Knight, USA (Ret,) Senate Issues Yearbook Director Peter J. Thomas, Secretary Administrative Vice Chairman Senate Report Lawrence J. Straw, Jr., Treasurer Charles Orndorff Director of Research Grass Roots Richard Derham and Publications Member's Report J, Alan MacKay Field Coordinator Annual Report Monroe Thomas Joyce Runyon Conservative Manifesto National Director Financial Secretary Director of Howard Phillips Peggy Cross Administrative Services Margie Wilkins The Viguerie Company A Direct Mail Advertising Agency . 7777 Leesburg Pike, Fails Church, Virginia 22043;(703) 356-0440 COPY APPROVAL REQUEST Da^fe: 7-30-82 jq. Howard Phillips From: Johnson Enclosed for your review are copies of the package described below. Package Name: stop E.R.A. Package Signer: Howard Phillips Package Components: JL JL Page letter (computer/i398^ 2. reply form (computer/56JpP¥S«) — 3. flyer (description - ) brochure (description ~ x_ 5. BRE/Wfic ' ^ 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Young Americans for Freedom Box: 28
    Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. Collection: Blackwell, Morton: Files Folder Title: Young Americans for Freedom Box: 28 To see more digitized collections visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected] Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ Georgetown Young Americans for Freedom P.O . Box 3033 Washington, D.C. 20057 (202) 944-1291 Richard J. Mathias Chairman Patrick Mahon Vice-Chairman Kevin Piediscalzi Treasurer Quin Hillyer ~\\~, Secretary Don McLaughlin Program Director . J w~ M -h ~ r ~ ~ Kevin Kime Membership Director ~ Q""'RA,-!/.M'j wi~4~N~- Bridget Brooker Public Relations Brad Seiling Ul v~ Public Relations .ftvl'Al ~ ::,~ ~4 J }- Deroy Murdock Executive Director ~ ~ r r--t-1-ic1~ .M cf)/V/~ - ~ ~ _k~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ I w-laf-tvi,-1 C\.v\ w~}P ~,.de - ~ ~ ~ Iv~ wJ2JJ r•JJ..e. '14 ~ t,,11-,/ ~ ~uw/4 ~ w1d w/4J./-1 ~ al ~~ f~~. ~ ~ CnCQ~I~ ~ (;.e_t,.,~1 J-®'M.w.1~ c,W~c.J,__ PAGE 4A / WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 2 GOP told to follow FDR's example BY A WASHINGTON TIMES STAFF WRITER policy initiatives even when he knew A lack of grass-roots activism contri­ defensive," - they get to select the The Republicans could suffer "a some of them would fail, Blackwell said. buted strongly to the Democratic con­ terms of battle. , lonely landslide". next year unless they Eisenhower, on the other hand, quickly gressional resurgence in the 1982 "Every election," he said, "is a refer­ can find a way to put their conservative lost his opportunity while retaining his midterm congressional elections, endum on something," and ·conserva, coalition back together in time for the personal popularity, Blackwell said.
    [Show full text]
  • RIGHT WINGERS and the ERA by Lucy Komisar the John Birch Society Is Openly Involved Where Thelr Oxen Are Gored
    AUGUST, 1977 NOW I' \(ol I CONSERVATION COALITION THREATENS WOMEN'S RIGHTS RIGHT WINGERS AND THE ERA by Lucy Komisar The John Birch Society is openly involved where thelr oxen are gored. titled The Machismo Factor.) in the anti-ERA campaign, and its national (Lucy Komisar Is author of The New (Note. This article has been reprinted Why would a leaflet against the Equal speaker on the Issue, State Sen. Mary Helm Femlnlsm and Down and Out In the U.S.A. with permission from the Philadelphia Rights Amendment include an attack on of Oklahoma, was featured at the She ls presently worltlng on a new booll Inquirer, Monday, June 27, 1977} OSHA - the Labor Department's Tallahassee rally Schlafly headlined in Occupational Safety and Health April. Helm told me she is also a member of Administration? Why do anti-ERA meetings the Eagle Forum. feature speakers urging people to support Schlafly herself was a Birch Society right-to-work laws and continued American member, according to the Socfety's March, control of the Panama Canal? 1960 Bulletin, although she now denies, this, The answer is that the national campaign and she spoke at the organization's national to defeat the ERA is not a spontaneous "God, Family and Country" rally a few movement by housewives and others who years ago. want to maintain women's traditional role Harry Dent, the former Nixon aide who or who fear the loss of benefits or protec­ lives in South Carolina, says Birchers are tions. It is a movement aimed at organizing heavily involved in the anti-ERA campaign women into a political machine to elect In his state and that it has proved a good conservatives to office and to support right­ organiZing tool for the radical right.
    [Show full text]
  • The Religious Right and the Carter Administration Author(S): Robert Freedman Reviewed Work(S): Source: the Historical Journal, Vol
    The Religious Right and the Carter Administration Author(s): Robert Freedman Reviewed work(s): Source: The Historical Journal, Vol. 48, No. 1 (Mar., 2005), pp. 231-260 Published by: Cambridge University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4091685 . Accessed: 05/07/2012 11:44 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Cambridge University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Historical Journal. http://www.jstor.org Press TheHistorical Journal, 48, I (2005), pp. 23I-260 ? 2005 CambridgeUniversity DOI: Io.Io17/Sooi8246Xo4oo4285 Printedin the United Kingdom THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT AND THE CARTER ADMINISTRATION* ROBERT FREEDMAN Trinity Hall, Cambridge the late A B S T R AC T. The 'religiousright' cameto prominence in the US during 1970osby campaigning on 'social issues' and encouragingmany fundamentalist and evangelicalChristians to get involvedin politics. However,the fact that it clashedwith 'born again' PresidentJimmy Carterover tax breaksfor religiousschools believed to be discriminatory,together with its illiberalstances on manyissues, meant that it was characterizedas an extremistmovement. I arguethat this assessmentis oversimplified.First, many racists. Christianschools were not racially discriminatory,and theirdefenders resented being labelledas Secondly,few historianshave recognizedthat the Christiansinvolved in the religiousright were among the most secularizedof their kind.
    [Show full text]