DOCSLIB.ORG

13/04/16 Submission to Horizons

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Our Ref: 626073 File: A53-0033 13 April 2016 To: Horizons Regional Council [email protected] Subject: RUAPEHU DISTRICT COUNCIL’S SUBMISSION TO HORIZONS REGIONAL COUNCIL’S ANNUAL PLAN 2016/17 Submission from: Ruapehu District Council Private Bag 1001 TAUMARUNUI 3964 Point of Contact: Anne-Marie Westcott ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER Email: [email protected] Phone: 07 895 8188 COUNCIL WISHES TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF ITS SUBMISSION. 1 Thank you for the opportunity to submit on the draft Annual Plan 2016-17. We apologise that this submission is late. We received the draft Annual Plan material on March 29 2016, just two weeks before the deadline for submissions. This is a very tight turnaround and we were unable to write the submission in the time available. We would have liked more time to be able to engage with our own Elected Members on the issues raised for consultation in this Annual Plan. 1.1 Ruapehu District Council (RDC) generally supports the proposals in the Horizons Draft Annual Plan 2016-17, however we would like to comment on some aspects of it. 2 SECTION TWO – LAND AND WATER MANAGEMENT 2.1 RDC is grateful for the support given by Horizons during the contamination of Raetihi river system. The Raetihi community continues to watch the Makotuku River closely and is concerned about its general degradation from its headwaters throughout the catchment. Page 2 Our Ref: 626073 13 April 2016 2.2 Thank you also for your efforts in the Environment Court in attempting to limit NZ Energy’s water abstraction. RDC notes that the ‘Water Allocation Grandfather’ clause does create rights for the energy company but is concerned about the volume grandfathered under the One Plan water allocation system which has been shown to have an effect on the Makotuku River water quality and quantity. 2.3 Recently RDC, in conjunction with Horizons staff, developed an application for funding from Envirolink to provide a better understanding of the respective impacts of ammonia, nitrate and phosphorus on periphyton growth in rivers downstream of point source discharges. However, and disappointingly, Horizons has recently chosen not to submit this application for funding. This research would provide better certainty about effluent treatment standards that are needed to address environmental impacts caused by excessive periphyton growth. This research is relevant to many wastewater treatment systems which discharge to water across the Horizons Region and nationally. Within the Horizons Region, it has direct relevance to discharges managed by Rangitikei DC, Manawatu DC, Palmerston North City Council, Tararua DC and Ruapehu DC. Periphyton growth is a major question, and the lack of understanding around this leads to significant cost in the consenting process. The expected outcomes from this research would have helped significantly clarify the scientific debate in recent high profile consent cases such as the Palmerston North wastewater plant discharge to the Manawatu River and the Feilding wastewater plant discharge to the Oroua River. In the Ruapehu District, this research is directly relevant to the discharge from the Raetihi wastewater plant to the Makotuku River. 2.3.1 Given the research relates to a gap in scientific knowledge, with at least region-wide applications, rather than to a site-specific problem, it seems logical that the research effort (including funding) should not be borne by one individual district council, and that it falls within regional council’s role to lead or at least contribute to the effort. This was acknowledged at staff level, and accordingly an application for Envirolink medium advice grant was developed between Ruapehu District Council, Massey University and Horizons staff, with the research to be conducted by Massey University’s School of Engineering and Advanced Technology and Aquanet Consulting. In that process we must commend Horizons Scientist’s collaboration and efforts. Manawatu and Rangitikei Districts have agreed to provide in-kind contributing in the form of monitoring equipment. Both Massey and RDC invested significant staff and consultant time to develop the proposal, only for the proposal to not be submitted by Horizons. We note that Horizons were not asked to fund the proposal, only to submit the application. Horizons’ failure to lodge the application is now costing RDC additional staff and consultant time to pursue alternative sources of funding. 2.3.2 RDC believes the causes of the growth of periphyton downstream of point source discharges are not well understood and would like Horizons as the lead environmental agent to investigate the factors involved in periphyton growth in the whole catchment of the Makotuku River. RDC cannot afford to go down the track that Palmerston North City Council did in removing phosphorous from its effluent, only to find that it did not solve the effect created in the river by the discharge. 2.4 RDC is currently charged $26,463 as an Additional Research Site under Water Quality Charges for Discharge Consents (Schedule of Charges, Horizons Annual Plan, pg Page 3 Our Ref: 626073 13 April 2016 191). This is on top of the Discharge to Water annual fee and any compliance inspection cost of the resource consent discharge. The Additional Research Site fee is the highest fee of all charges for Water Quality Discharge consents in the region with the next being Rangitikei District Council followed by Manawatu District Council. It is assumed that this fee goes towards research into effects on the river systems from wastewater treatment discharges, however the resource consent applications are now lodged and RDC sees limited value (with the exception of Raetihi) in continuing to collect such a high level of detailed information. 3 SECTION THREE - FLOOD PROTECTION AND CONTROL WORKS 3.1 The Makotuku River at Raetihi Township is significantly congested with willows, both above and below the township. The willows have the effect of forming a dam and holding water up in this area. This creates a high risk within the township at peak flows when the township drainage systems are no longer able to discharge in to the Makotuku River as was the case in June 2015. This resulted in a number of habitable floors being affected with flooding and some self-evacuation occurring. Council seeks to partner with Regional Council in managing this river system. 3.2 RDC wishes to thank Horizons for their investigation into the upper Mangawhero and tributaries for flood and erosion risks in Ohakune (Draft, July 2015). RDC provisionally supports the development of the Upper Mangawhero and Tributaries Scheme. We ask that it extends to cover construction that safeguards RDC’s wastewater treatment asset and links with the downstream private scheme. As Horizons are the specialist in stock bank flooding development we ask that they lead this proposal. Also that they investigate the river gravel management within the proposed scheme area to control flooding. 3.2.1 RDC would also like to understand the rating impacts of this scheme on the Ohakune community before making a final commitment to the scheme. 3.3 Taringamotu River scheme RDC would like to thank Horizons for undertaking the improvements to the Taringamotu River Scheme and its ongoing support. While the establishment of the scheme appeared to be quite fraught, it has improved the river system for the community. 3.4 Upper Whanganui River Scheme The maintenance and clearing of poplars in the lower Ongarue River and previous clearing of the township has been much appreciated by locals. This project has noticeably enhanced the visibility and beauty of the Whanganui River system for the Taumarunui community. 4 SECTION FOUR - BIOSECURITY AND BIOACTIVITY MANAGEMENT 4.1 Please refer to RDC’s submission to Horizons Animal and Plant Pest Management Strategy (Attachment 1). 4.2 Ngati Rangi have aspirations to restore the bush and wetlands area adjacent to the Ohakune Wastewater Treatment Plant. We support their endeavors in this project. 5 SECTION FIVE – REGIONAL LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE 5.1 Horizons provides rural advice to dairy farmers as a service. RDC believes that this is a Page 4 Our Ref: 626073 13 April 2016 service that Horizons could extend to councils regarding wastewater treatment systems. A more collaborative approach to technical concerns may help to avoid adversarial discussions at consent hearings and the resulting costs of adversarial positions. Collaboration would be a good move towards co-governance and partnership of service delivery for our communities as best practice moving forward. RDC has experienced the benefits of such a collaborative approach before lodgment in establishing the science and agreeing up front who would be collecting that science for our resource consents. We believe that other councils would benefit from such a collaborative approach. Currently costs for the Resource Consent can be more than the actual cost of the upgrade. 5.2 As discussed in the presentation given by RDC in October 2015 regarding resource consents, we found that Iwi had aspirations to be more involved in the governance space and discussions up front. This position still remains available within the Wai Group for Horizons to participate in our journey with Ngati Rangi and Ngati Uenuku. 5.3 Ngati Rangi and Ngati Uenuku would like to form a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with both RDC and Horizons. This desire for an MOU was referred to in the presentation in October 2014 regarding resource consents (proposed content of MOU attached. Attachment **) 6 REGIONAL ECONOMIC GROWTH RDC supports Horizons role in facilitating regional economic development. ATTACHMENT 1 Our Ref: 621864 File: C60-1254 09 February 2016 To: Horizons Regional Council Private Bag 11025 Manawatu Mail Centre PALMERSTON NORTH 4442 Subject: HORIZONS REGIONAL COUNCIL COMBINED REGIONAL PEST MANAGEMENT PLAN AND STRATEGY 2015-2025 Submission from: Ruapehu District Council Private Bag 1001 TAUMARUNUI 3964 Point of Contact: Anne- Marie Westcott ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER Email: [email protected] Phone: 07 895 8188 Council wishes to speak in support of its submission.
Recommended publications
  • Whanganui Headwaters AD.Pub

    Whanganui Headwaters AD.Pub

    Ongarue River Waimiha Stream Te Kui Despite its relave remoteness the Ongarue is a popular river offer- A delighul stream holding large numbers of rainbows and the occa- ing a good catch rate of large rainbow trout as well as many kilome- Te Kui to Mangakino sional big brown. The lower reaches offer clear, low banks providing tres of fishing water. 30 relavely easy fishing - a perfect place for the beginner. Further up- The lower reaches below the confluence with the Waimiha are rarely stream, the Waimiha flows through scrub and nave forest providing fished, somewhat surprising as this secon offers some very good Benneydale aracve fishing waters. Some good fish are taken from this secon. spin fishing waters especially in the gorge downstream from the Access is from Waimiha Road across farmland. Although there is a sign at the gate stang otherwise the Waimaiha Valley Road is a pa- Waimiha Township. Access is from the Waimiha-Ongarue Road which Waimiha Rd runs parallel to the river. per road and there is public access to the river about 5 km from the Waimiha Stream gate. Please get permission from the farmhouse just north of the Access to the middle reaches can be gained across farmland from the Waimiha-Ongarue Road turnoff or call the number on the gate. Ongarue Stream Road, which runs parallel to the river (landowners Waimiha Valley Rd permission required). The first public access via an unformed paper In the upper reaches the Waimiha is a small stream that meanders Te Kui across farmland with stable pools and runs.
  • 2031 Auckland/Waikato Fish & Game 15

    2031 Auckland/Waikato Fish & Game 15

    SPORTS FISH AND GAME MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR AUCKLAND/WAIKATO FISH AND GAME REGION 2021 – 2031 AUCKLAND/WAIKATO FISH & GAME 156 BRYMER RD, RD 9, HAMILTON PH: 07 849 1666 [email protected] www.fishandgame.org.nz Contents: PART 1 BACKGROUND AND RESOURCE SUMMARY How To Use this Plan ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Operation of Plan .................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. Plan Review ............................................................................................................................. 5 1.3. Organisational management .................................................................................................. 5 2. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Fish and Game New Zealand ................................................................................................... 6 2.2. The Auckland/Waikato Fish and Game ................................................................................... 6 3. Legal Context................................................................................................................................... 9 3.1. Conservation Act 1987 ............................................................................................................ 9 3.2. Wildlife Act 1953 ....................................................................................................................
  • Fish & Game New Zealand

    Fish & Game New Zealand

    F I S H A N D GAME NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND/WAIKATO REG ION SPORTS FISH AND GAME BIRD MANAGEMENT PLAN To manage, maintain and enhance the sports fish and game bird resource in the recreational interests of anglers and hunters 156 BRYMER ROAD, R.D. 9 HAMILTON 2 FOREWORD FROM THE CHAIRMAN I am pleased to present the Auckland/Waikato sports fish and game bird management plan. Auckland/Waikato was the first Fish and Game Council to prepare a plan, which was approved by the Minister of Conservation on 18th August 1994. This plan builds upon its predecessor and, as with such, will be put to good use in guiding Council over the next decade. The preparation of this plan reflects the significant responsibility entrusted to the Council to prepare a management plan for sports fish and game birds and their habitat in this region and to provide quality angling and hunting opportunities for licence holders. The plan has again involved consultation with a wide range of stakeholders. We appreciate the input these people have made, which will make the plan more enduring. Murray Young Chairman 13 October 2010 3 SPORTS FISH AND GAME B I R D MANAGEMENT PLAN To manage, maintain and enhance the sports fish and game bird resource in the recreational interests of anglers and hunters CONTENTS Foreword from the Chairman ......................................... 3 Contents .......................................................................... 4 Executive summary .......................................................... 5 PART ONE This Management Plan ..................................................... 6 Introduction ..................................................................... 8 PART TWO Goals and objectives ....................................................... 12 Policy and methods of implementation ......................... 14 PART THREE Organisational management ........................................... 23 Methods to be used .......................................................
  • Long-Term Plan 2021-31 Report No

    Long-Term Plan 2021-31 Report No

    LONG-TERM PLAN 2021-31 REPORT NO. 2021/EXT/1731 ISSN NO. ISSN 1176-9750 ISSN NO. ISSN1178-6574 (e) Contents Ngā ihirangi Section One – Setting the Scene 114 Prospective Statement of Cash Flows for the periods 2021-31 ($000) 3 Contents 115 Prospective Summary of Capital Purchases for the periods 2021- 5 Chair and Chief Executive’s Message 31 ($000) 6 Our Region 117 Prospective Reserve Balances for the periods 2021-31 ($000) 7 Your Councillors 118 Funding Impact Statements by Group of Activity 8 Vision and Community Outcomes 127 Prospective Funding Impact Statement to 30 June 2031 14 Strategic Challenges 128 Rates Funding Impact Statement for the Year Ending 30 June 15 Summary of the Infrastructure Strategy 2022 17 Finance Strategy 140 Sample Ratepayers for 2021-22 23 Summary of Rates and their changes 141 Statement of Accounting Policies to 30 June 2031 24 Sample Ratepayers for 2021-22 155 Significant Assumptions 169 River and Drainage Scheme Reserves Summary for the periods 2021-31 ($000) Section Two – Our Activities 171 River and Drainage Scheme Capex Renewal Reserves Summary 26 Land and Water Management for the periods 2021-31 ($000) 36 Flood Protection and Control Works 173 Annual Administrative Charges for the Year Ending 30 June 2022 48 Biosecurity and Biodiversity Protection 187 Long-term Plan Disclosure Statement for the periods 1 July 2021 55 Regional Leadership and Governance to 30 June 2031 69 Transport 77 Investment Section Five –Policies Section Three – Infrastructure Strategy 193 Revenue and Financing Policy 82 Infrastructure
  • Nzbotsoc No 64 June 2001

    Nzbotsoc No 64 June 2001

    NEW ZEALAND BOTANICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER NUMBER 64 JUNE 2001 New Zealand Botanical Society President: Jessica Beever Secretary/Treasurer: Anthony Wright Committee: Bruce Clarkson, Colin Webb, Carol West Address: c/- Canterbury Museum Rolleston Avenue CHRISTCHURCH 8001 Subscriptions The 2001 ordinary and institutional subs are $18 (reduced to $15 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). The 2001 student sub, available to full-time students, is $9 (reduced to $7 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). Back issues of the Newsletter are available at $2.50 each from Number 1 (August 1985) to Number 46 (December 1996), $3.00 each from Number 47 (March 1997) to Number 50 (December 1997), and $3.75 each from Number 51 (March 1998) onwards. Since 1986 the Newsletter has appeared quarterly in March, June, September and December. New Subscriptions are always welcome and these, together with back issue orders, should be sent to the Secretary/Treasurer (address above). Subscriptions are due by 28th February each year for that calendar year. Existing subscribers are sent an invoice with the December Newsletter for the next year's subscription which offers a reduction if this is paid by the due date. If you are in arrears with your subscription a reminder notice comes attached to each issue of the Newsletter. Deadline for next issue The deadline for the September 2001 issue (Number 65) is 25 August 2001. Please post contributions to: Joy Talbot 23 Salmond Street Christchurch 8002 Send contributions by e-mail to [email protected]. Files can be in WordPerfect (version 8 or earlier), MS Word (version 6 or earlier) or saved as RTF or ASCII.
  • The Alienation of Maori Land in the Ohura South Block

    The Alienation of Maori Land in the Ohura South Block

    OFFICIAL Wai 903, A59 The Alienation of Maori Land in the Ohura South block Part One: c.1886-1901 Steven Oliver and Tim Shoebridge September 2004 A Report Commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal Table of Contents List of tables 4 List of maps 4 Preface 5 Acknowledgements 5 Introduction 6 Chapter Overview 7 Methodology 8 1 The history of Ohura South lands to 1886 – Steven Oliver 18 1.1. Introduction 18 1.1.1. The Aotea and Ohura South blocks 18 1.2. The Maori tribal groups with interests in the land that became Ohura 19 South 1.2.1 Ngati Haua and Ohura South 20 1.2.2. Ngati Rangatahi, Ngati Wera and Ohura South 21 1.2.3. Ngati Maru and Ohura South 23 1.2.4. Ngati Urunumia and Ohura South 23 1.2.5. Other hapu and Ohura South 24 1.2.6. Report conclusions on the tribal groups of Ohura South 25 1.3. The political context of the Rohe Potae compact as it relates to the land 26 that became the Ohura South blocks 1.3.1. Early Pakeha incursions in the Rohe Potae, 1870s 27 1.3.2. The Rohe Potae compact in the 1880s 28 1.4. The Main Trunk Railway and land alienation in the district 31 1.5. The beginnings of Crown purchasing and the response of groups of 33 Maori with interests in the land 1.6. Conclusion 36 2 The Native Land Court hearings of 1886, 1888, and 1892 – Steven Oliver 38 2.1. Introduction 38 2.2.
  • Resource Consent Activities for March and April 2013

    Resource Consent Activities for March and April 2013

    RESOURCE CONSENT ACTIVITIES FOR MARCH AND APRIL 2013 THE FACTS AND FIGURES Interesting Facts March and April received comparison: 1. The year has continued to be busy 11-12 year 10-11 year 09-10 year for the Consents Team. 97 99 96 2. Over the past two months the March and April resolved comparison: Consents Team has received 11-12 year 10-11 year 09-10 year 37 applications in March, and 120 107 101 28 applications in April. 3. The Consents Team granted 35 consents in March and 19 consents in April. 4. As at 30 April 2013 the Consents Team had 175 applications to process compared to 166 applications that were reported last Environment Committee. 5. The consent activity is steady at present and we expect that trend to continue and increase as the year progresses with consents going to hearings and consents coming in for water allocation. 6. The Consents Team is continuing to progress matters on the Territorial Authority Wastewater Treatment Plant and industry applications, a summary of which is provided later in this item. NOTIFIED APPLICATIONS IN MARCH AND APRIL 2013 7. During March we publicly notified the suite of applications received from Fonterra Co-operative Group relating to the Pahiatua Plant expansion. These applications were jointly notified with applications made to Tararua District Council with Horizons being the lead agency. Submissions closed on 17 April 2013 and a total of 44 submissions were received. 8. One consent application was limited notified in March, being an application received from Aorere Farms Partnership for a renewal of Discharge Permits (land and air) and a new Water Permit (groundwater) associated with their piggery operation.
  • Schedule Ba Water Management Zones and Associated Values

    Schedule Ba Water Management Zones and Associated Values

    PART Ba2.2: How and Where Specific Water ^Management Values Apply USER NOTE: For map abbreviations – refer to the fold-out A3 VALUES KEY at the back of this Schedule. 1 Ecosystem Values 1 Note to the Hearing Panel: This key is conceptualised but has not been fully designed to work as it would in the plan as yet Proposed One Plan Ba-56 Schedule Ba Life Supporting Capacity (LSC) Value Map D:10 Ba:10 Visual guide to the distribution of the Life Supporting Capacity (LSC) vValue in water bodies* across the Manawatu-Wanganui Region. Proposed One Plan Ba-57 Schedule Ba Table D.4: Life Supporting Capacity Value by Management Zone/Sub-zone in the Manawatu-Wanganui Region Life Supporting Capacity Management Zone Sub zone Description* Classification Upper Manawatu Manawatu River - source to Weber Road (U23:751 027) HM Upper Manawatu Mangatewainui Mangatewainui River - source to Manawatu confluence (U23:829 086) HM Mangatoro Mangatoro Stream - source to Manawatu confluence (U23:810 027) HSS Weber-Tamaki Manawatu River - Weber Road to Tamaki confluence HM Weber-Tamaki Mangatera Mangatera Stream - source to Manawatu confluence (U23:737 025) HM Upper Tamaki Upper Tamaki Tamaki River - source to water supply weir (U23:709 111) UHS Upper Kumeti Upper Kumeti Kumeti Stream - source to Te Rehunga flow recorder (T23:663 052) UHS Tamaki-Hopelands Manawatu River - Tamaki confluence to Hopelands (T24: 616 899) HM Lower Tamaki Tamaki River - Water supply weir to Manawatu confluence (U23:709 002) HM Tamaki-Hopelands Lower Kumeti Kumeti Stream - Te Rehunga to Manawatu
  • Angler Usage of Lake and River Fisheries Managed by Fish & Game

    Angler Usage of Lake and River Fisheries Managed by Fish & Game

    Angler usage of lake and river fisheries managed by Fish & Game New Zealand: results from the 2001/02 National Angling Survey NIWA Client Report: CHC2003-114 December 2003 NIWA Project: NZF03501 Angler usage of lake and river fisheries managed by Fish & Game New Zealand: results from the 2001/02 National Angling Survey Martin Unwin Katie Image Prepared for Fish & Game New Zealand NIWA Client Report: CHC2003- 114 December 2003 NIWA Project: NZF03501 National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd 10 Kyle Street, Riccarton, Christchurch P O Box 8602, Christchurch, New Zealand Phone +64-3-348 8987, Fax +64-3-348 5548 www.niwa.co.nz All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced or copied in any form, without the permission of the client. Such permission is to be given only in accordance with the terms of the client’s contract with NIWA. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage of material in any kind of information retrieval system. Contents Summary i 1. Introduction 3 1.1. Freshwater angling in New Zealand 3 2. Survey design and implementation 5 2.1. Scope, format, and objectives 5 2.2. Sampling design 7 2.2.1. Licence types and strata 7 2.2.2. Survey population 9 2.2.3. Sample sizes 9 2.2.4. Interview procedures 13 2.3. Data analysis 16 3. Results 17 3.1. Licence database 17 3.2. The replies 22 3.3. Usage estimates 22 3.3.1. Cross-boundary usage 24 3.3.2. Multi-reach rivers 26 3.3.3.
  • Flora and Vegetation of Pureora

    Flora and Vegetation of Pureora

    Flora and Vegetation of Pureora M. D. Wilcox The Auckland Botanical Society held an Easter Camp 2 5 April 1999 based at Pureora Lodge in the northern block of Pureora Forest Park 20 km east of Benneydale. Those who took part were: Enid Asquith Graeme Hambly Helen Lyons Stella Rowe Mike Wilcox Paul Asquith John Hobbs Morag Macdonald Pat Seyb Nancy Wilcox Daphne Blackshaw Val Hollard Simon OConnor Shirley Smith Pam Wilcox Quentin Blackshaw Marcel Horvath Helen Preston Jones Alison Wesley David Wilson Lisa Clapperton Frank Hudson Roslyn Prichard Barbara White Catherine Yong Brian Cumber Wyne Johns Juliet Richmond Bob White Maureen Young Colleen Foster John Jordan John Rowe BOTANICAL PROGRAMME Seven sites were visited and studied. These were : • Frost flats and valley of the Karamarama Stream a headwater of the Waipapa River adjoining the Pureora Lodge Waipapa Ecological Area Forest Walk Mire complex of Waipapa Ecological Area Pureora Mountain Totara Walk Buried Forest and Pikiariki tower area Waimiha Stream bog pine reserve A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO PUREORA Pureora Forest Park is administered by the carried out at Pureora on forest regeneration and Department of Conservation (DOC) and covers an selection logging (Beveridge 1964 1973 1983; area of 78 OOO hectares in the northern King Country. Herbert 1978 1980 1986; Smale et al. 1987 1998). It is an amalgamation of the former Wharepuhunga Selection logging was tried on a small scale at Tihoi Pouakani Pureora Hurakia Tihoi Taringamotu and and Pouakani for a short period before logging was Waituhi State Forests. Several Ecological Areas finally stopped altogether. (Mangatutu Waipapa Pikiariki Waimonoa Rata nunui Maramataha Nga Morehu Pureora Mountain The main geographic features which have shaped the Waihaha Whenuakura) have been designated within vegetation at Pureora are the inland elevated locality the Park representative of all the major vegetation with generally abundant moisture (180 rain days types (Nicholls 1978).
  • Riparian Management and Public Access – Policy RP2

    Riparian Management and Public Access – Policy RP2

    Riparian Management and Public Access – Policy RP2 RIPARIAN MANAGEMENT AND PUBLIC ACCESS - POLICY RP2.1 Introduction Many waterways within the District are significant to the District community. Traditionally, they have been a source of food, a place for recreation, a medium for transport and a source of scenic and spiritual value. The waterways also have a number of other social and economic values. Section 6 of the Act requires, as a matter of national importance, the preservation of the natural character of wetlands and lakes and rivers and their margins, and the protection of them from inappropriate subdivision, use and development. Council must recognise this matter in its District Plan. In recognising this matter, Council is mindful that the use of regulation may not be the most effective and efficient method available in all situations. The maintenance and enhancement of public access to and along lakes and rivers is also a matter that Council must recognise and provide for. Presently within the District, access to waterways is obtained by a number of mechanisms, including existing reserves, marginal strips, legal roads (formed and unformed), across public land and by agreement with landowners. The District has many waterways which are significant for recreation activities such as rafting, fishing and walking. The most significant recreational waterways have been specified in the Plan. For these waterways, it is the priority to ensure that good opportunities for gaining public access are provided. There are also a number of other waterways in the District where public access is desired. However, this may only be on certain areas of a waterway.
  • Trout Technical Report

    Trout Technical Report

    MANAGING OUR ENVIRONMENT GETTING PEOPLE PLACES Re creational Fishing and Spawning Values in the M anawatu-Wanganui Region : Te chnical Report to Support Policy Development May 2007 Recreational Fishing and Spawning Values in the Manawatu- Wanganui Region : Technical Report to Support Policy Development May 2007 Authors Kate McArthur and James Lambie Internally Reviewed and Approved by Alistair Beveridge External Review by Peter Taylor Fish & Game New Zealand Council Callum Lilley Department of Conservation Acknowledgements to Maree Clark, Olivier Ausseil, Allen Stancliff Wellington, Taranaki and Auckland-Waikato Fish & Game Councils for the provision of data on trout fishery and spawning location. May 2007 ISBN: 1-877413-83-6 Report No: 2007/EXT/797 CONTACT 24hr Freephone 0508 800 800 [email protected] www.horizons.govt.nz Kairanga Cnr Rongotea & Kairanga-Bunnythorpe Rds Palmerston North Levin Palmerston North 11 Bruce Road 11-15 Victoria Avenue SERVICE Marton REGIONAL Cnr Hammond & Hair Sts DEPOTS CENTRES HOUSES Taihape Wanganui Torere Road Taumarunui 181 Guyton Street 34 Maata Street Ohotu Woodville Cnr Vogel (SH2) & Tay Sts POSTAL Horizons Regional Council, Private Bag 11025, Manawatu Mail Centre, Palmerston North 4442 | 06 9522 929 ADDRESS F EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Native fishery, trout fishery and trout spawning values have been designated for water management zones and river reaches in the Manawatu-Wanganui Region as part of the development of a water management framework underpinning the new combined Regional Plan and Policy Statement – the One Plan. Maintenance of the physical habitat requirements to support these values is integral to enabling these recreational/ cultural activities to continue within the Region.