DOCSLIB.ORG

Download (1008.3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download (1008.3 X May 2013 Rob Robson File ref: ESM 01 01 Manager 2013/01866 Minerals, Strategy, Planning and Promotion PAT:JHC New Zealand Petroleum and Minerals Dear Rob PROPOSED COMPETITIVE TENDER OFFER FOR METALLIC MINERALS EXPLORATION PERMITS – MANAWATU-WANGANUI Thank you for the opportunity to provide New Zealand Petroleum and Minerals with information regarding areas of particular sensitivity in the proposed tender area, within the Manawatu-Wanganui (Horizons) Region. Our analysis of the small part of the proposed area that lies within the Region has identified the reaches of river mapped in Proposed One Plan (POP)1 Schedule AB which are identified as having particular cultural, social, economic and ecological values. In addition to values common to all the reaches (which include industrial abstraction, Mauri, contact recreation and stock water), there are values identified as applying to particular reaches: specific water supplies, reaches valued for trout spawning or trout fishery, natural state2, and ‘Sites of Significance – Aquatic’ which are known habitat of specific native fish. These reaches are shown on the attached map labelled Figure 1. Note that more than one value can apply to any reach. Our analysis has also focused on the types of terrestrial and wetland habitat described in POP Schedule E and categorised as an ‘at-risk’ or ‘threatened’ indigenous habitat. We used the Leathwick habitat model (a GIS-based predictive model) to indicate where these remaining areas of native forest and wetland habitats are likely to be located within the proposed exploration area. The analysis has identified five threatened or at-risk Schedule E habitat types, covering approximately 33263 hectares, in the proposed tender area. These are shown on the attached map labelled Figure 2. The following table provides more detail about these five habitat types. Indigenous habitat type Threat category Area (ha) 1. Rimu-tawa / kamahi forest Threatened 12129.7 2. Podocarp-broadleaf fuchsia forest Threatened 11 3. Wetlands Threatened 39 4. Hall’s totara / broadleaf forest At-risk 4896 5. Podocarp / kamahi forest At-risk 16187 Total = 33262.7 ha Horizons acknowledges that the mapping of habitat types is indicative only and is intended for use at a district or regional scale. As it may not be an exact interpretation 1 The combined Regional Policy Statement and Regional Plans for the Manawatu-Wanganui Region. Note that while the POP is not yet operative, all appeals on the relevant provisions have now been resolved. 2 Defined in POP Schedule AB as “all sections of rivers and their beds that have sources in, and flow within, the Public Conservation Land… with the exception of those where damming or diversion have significantly affected the natural state of the water”. \\file\herman\E\SM\01\01\Epithermal Gold exploration tender 2013\MWRC DRAFT Letter to NZPAM re proposed competitive tender offer 20130501_with memo attached.docx of the vegetation actually present, it is our practice to offer to investigate any area where work potentially affecting an area of native forest or wetland is proposed. We note that a large part of the proposed tender area is managed by the Department of Conservation, specifically the Pureora Forest Park. A further area is subject to a Nga Whenua Rahui kawanata. These areas are shown with an overlay on the attached map and comprise a large proportion of the at-risk and threatened habitats listed above. It is our understanding that the land would be regulated by Horizons’ POP, as well as the relevant conservation legislation, where it is not exempted by section 4(3) of the Resource Management Act 1991. It is likely that many activities associated with mineral exploration in the proposed tender area within the Horizons region will either be subject to permitted activity conditions or require resource consent. For example: disturbance of the bed of a river with a Schedule AB Value of Natural State or Site of Significance – Aquatic, is a discretionary activity; permitted activities in the reach of a river with a value of trout fishery are subject to a more stringent condition relating to suspended sediment that applies on Saturdays, Sundays and public holidays between 1 December and 28 February; any land disturbance or vegetation clearance, including drilling, constructing or altering a bore, in an at-risk habitat or threatened habitat, is a discretionary activity or non-complying activity respectively. Horizons would welcome inquiries from NZPAM or parties interested in undertaking exploration activities at a specific site regarding the rules that would be likely to apply to the proposal. As mentioned above, there are two maps attached which show information at a regional scale; also enclosed is a compact disc containing pdf versions of these maps which can be enlarged and examined more closely. If it would be helpful, Horizons can provide paper copies in A0 size. Finally, a copy of the analysis that supports the maps is attached. Thank you again for the opportunity to highlight the areas within our Region that we have identified as being sensitive to potential activities. Yours sincerely Bruce Gordon CHAIRMAN Encls Memorandum 2 MEMORANDUM DATE: 24 April 2013 TO: Penelope Tucker FROM: Manas Chakraborty SUBJECT: Identifying surface water (Schedule AB) and indigenous biodiversity (Schedule E) values within the proposed tender (New Zealand Epithermal Gold 2013) area for exploration of metallic minerals Hi Pen, I have done a spatial (GIS) analysis to identify the “areas of particular sensitivity” within the proposed New Zealand Epithermal Gold 2013 tender area in our region for exploration of metallic minerals. While doing this analysis, I have particularly emphasised on the values as identified in the Schedule AB (Surface Water Values including ecological as well as socio- economic) and Schedule E (Indigenous Biological Diversity) of the Proposed One Plan as Amended by Decisions. The south-western part (approximately 7% of the tender area) of the proposed tender area, which falls within the Manawatu-Wanganui Region, covers about 3% of the whole region. SURFACE WATER VALUES (SCHEDULE AB) IN THE PROPOSED TENDER AREA The following Water Management Sub-zones or catchments within our region fall within the proposed tender area: Upper Ongarue (Zone code - Whai_2f; Water Management Zone - Cherry Grove) Lower Ongarue (Zone code - Whai_2g; Water Management Zone - Cherry Grove) Pungapunga (Zone code – Whai_2e; Water Management Zone – Cherry Grove) The following reach-specific surface water values have been identified in the Upper Ongarue catchment: Site of significance for aquatic biodiversity or SOS-A (whio or blue ducks recorded in the Maramataha River and its tributaries as well as in the Mangatukutuku Stream) Trout Spawning habitat (Waimiha Stream, Kahoho Stream, Ongarue River upstream of the Ongarue Stream Road, Okauaka Stream, Piropiro Stream, Maramataha River, Waione Stream, Waikoura Stream, Mangatukutuku Stream) Trout fishery (Waimiha Stream, Ongarue River – Regionally significant, Okauaka Stream, Maramataha River & its tributaries, Waione Stream, Waikoura Stream, Mangatukutuku Stream) Natural State (Tributaries of the Waimiha Stream, Ongarue River, Maramataha River and its tributaries, Waione Stream, and Mangatukutuku Stream and any other unnamed waterways that fall within the Public Conservation Land) Water Supply Take (Pureora; Source – Whareana Stream) The following reach-specific surface water values have been identified in the Lower Ongarue catchment: Trout spawning habitat (Mangakahu Stream, Taringamotu River and its tributaries) Trout fishery (Taringamotu River and its tributaries) Natural State (upstream tributaries of the Taringamotu River, which flow through the Public Conservation Land) The following reach-specific surface water values have been identified in the Pungapunga catchment: Site of significance for aquatic biodiversity or SOS-A (whio and the endangered migratory freshwater fish species koaro recorded in the upper reaches of the Pungapunga River and its tributaries before the confluence of the Tunawaharoa Stream) Trout spawning habitat (Pungapunga River and its tributaries) Trout fishery (Pungapunga River) Natural State (upstream tributaries of the Pungapunga River, which flow through the Public Conservation Land) Water Supply Take (Ngapuke School; Source – Pungapunga River and tributaries) Apart from the above mentioned reach-specific values, the above three catchments also have the following zone-wide values: . Life Supporting Capacity - UVA (Upland volcanic acidic) class in Upper Ongarue catchment and UVM (Upland volcanic mixed) class in Lower Ongarue and Pungapunga catchments . Aesthetics . Water abstraction for Irrigation . Industrial abstraction . Existing infrastructure . Mauri . Contact Recreation . Stock Water . Capacity to Assimilate Pollution A detailed list of the above mentioned surface water values can be found in the Table AB.1 of the Schedule AB in the following link: http://www.horizons.govt.nz/assets/one-plan-august- 2010/HRC_OP_Vol4_ScheduleAB.pdf The development of the Water Management Zones and their respective surface water values for the purpose of monitoring the water quality standards and habitats required for aquatic biodiversity on catchment basis can be found in the following officer’s report submitted during the One Plan Hearing process: http://www.horizons.govt.nz/assets/horizons/Images/One%20Plan%20Officers%20reports%20w ater%20hearing/Ms%20Maree%20Ellen%20Clark.pdf
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Whanganui Headwaters AD.Pub
    Ongarue River Waimiha Stream Te Kui Despite its relave remoteness the Ongarue is a popular river offer- A delighul stream holding large numbers of rainbows and the occa- ing a good catch rate of large rainbow trout as well as many kilome- Te Kui to Mangakino sional big brown. The lower reaches offer clear, low banks providing tres of fishing water. 30 relavely easy fishing - a perfect place for the beginner. Further up- The lower reaches below the confluence with the Waimiha are rarely stream, the Waimiha flows through scrub and nave forest providing fished, somewhat surprising as this secon offers some very good Benneydale aracve fishing waters. Some good fish are taken from this secon. spin fishing waters especially in the gorge downstream from the Access is from Waimiha Road across farmland. Although there is a sign at the gate stang otherwise the Waimaiha Valley Road is a pa- Waimiha Township. Access is from the Waimiha-Ongarue Road which Waimiha Rd runs parallel to the river. per road and there is public access to the river about 5 km from the Waimiha Stream gate. Please get permission from the farmhouse just north of the Access to the middle reaches can be gained across farmland from the Waimiha-Ongarue Road turnoff or call the number on the gate. Ongarue Stream Road, which runs parallel to the river (landowners Waimiha Valley Rd permission required). The first public access via an unformed paper In the upper reaches the Waimiha is a small stream that meanders Te Kui across farmland with stable pools and runs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2031 Auckland/Waikato Fish & Game 15
    SPORTS FISH AND GAME MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR AUCKLAND/WAIKATO FISH AND GAME REGION 2021 – 2031 AUCKLAND/WAIKATO FISH & GAME 156 BRYMER RD, RD 9, HAMILTON PH: 07 849 1666 [email protected] www.fishandgame.org.nz Contents: PART 1 BACKGROUND AND RESOURCE SUMMARY How To Use this Plan ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Operation of Plan .................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. Plan Review ............................................................................................................................. 5 1.3. Organisational management .................................................................................................. 5 2. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Fish and Game New Zealand ................................................................................................... 6 2.2. The Auckland/Waikato Fish and Game ................................................................................... 6 3. Legal Context................................................................................................................................... 9 3.1. Conservation Act 1987 ............................................................................................................ 9 3.2. Wildlife Act 1953 ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fish & Game New Zealand
    F I S H A N D GAME NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND/WAIKATO REG ION SPORTS FISH AND GAME BIRD MANAGEMENT PLAN To manage, maintain and enhance the sports fish and game bird resource in the recreational interests of anglers and hunters 156 BRYMER ROAD, R.D. 9 HAMILTON 2 FOREWORD FROM THE CHAIRMAN I am pleased to present the Auckland/Waikato sports fish and game bird management plan. Auckland/Waikato was the first Fish and Game Council to prepare a plan, which was approved by the Minister of Conservation on 18th August 1994. This plan builds upon its predecessor and, as with such, will be put to good use in guiding Council over the next decade. The preparation of this plan reflects the significant responsibility entrusted to the Council to prepare a management plan for sports fish and game birds and their habitat in this region and to provide quality angling and hunting opportunities for licence holders. The plan has again involved consultation with a wide range of stakeholders. We appreciate the input these people have made, which will make the plan more enduring. Murray Young Chairman 13 October 2010 3 SPORTS FISH AND GAME B I R D MANAGEMENT PLAN To manage, maintain and enhance the sports fish and game bird resource in the recreational interests of anglers and hunters CONTENTS Foreword from the Chairman ......................................... 3 Contents .......................................................................... 4 Executive summary .......................................................... 5 PART ONE This Management Plan ..................................................... 6 Introduction ..................................................................... 8 PART TWO Goals and objectives ....................................................... 12 Policy and methods of implementation ......................... 14 PART THREE Organisational management ........................................... 23 Methods to be used .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 13/04/16 Submission to Horizons
    Our Ref: 626073 File: A53-0033 13 April 2016 To: Horizons Regional Council [email protected] Subject: RUAPEHU DISTRICT COUNCIL’S SUBMISSION TO HORIZONS REGIONAL COUNCIL’S ANNUAL PLAN 2016/17 Submission from: Ruapehu District Council Private Bag 1001 TAUMARUNUI 3964 Point of Contact: Anne-Marie Westcott ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER Email: [email protected] Phone: 07 895 8188 COUNCIL WISHES TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF ITS SUBMISSION. 1 Thank you for the opportunity to submit on the draft Annual Plan 2016-17. We apologise that this submission is late. We received the draft Annual Plan material on March 29 2016, just two weeks before the deadline for submissions. This is a very tight turnaround and we were unable to write the submission in the time available. We would have liked more time to be able to engage with our own Elected Members on the issues raised for consultation in this Annual Plan. 1.1 Ruapehu District Council (RDC) generally supports the proposals in the Horizons Draft Annual Plan 2016-17, however we would like to comment on some aspects of it. 2 SECTION TWO – LAND AND WATER MANAGEMENT 2.1 RDC is grateful for the support given by Horizons during the contamination of Raetihi river system. The Raetihi community continues to watch the Makotuku River closely and is concerned about its general degradation from its headwaters throughout the catchment. Page 2 Our Ref: 626073 13 April 2016 2.2 Thank you also for your efforts in the Environment Court in attempting to limit NZ Energy’s water abstraction. RDC notes that the ‘Water Allocation Grandfather’ clause does create rights for the energy company but is concerned about the volume grandfathered under the One Plan water allocation system which has been shown to have an effect on the Makotuku River water quality and quantity.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Plan 2021-31 Report No
    LONG-TERM PLAN 2021-31 REPORT NO. 2021/EXT/1731 ISSN NO. ISSN 1176-9750 ISSN NO. ISSN1178-6574 (e) Contents Ngā ihirangi Section One – Setting the Scene 114 Prospective Statement of Cash Flows for the periods 2021-31 ($000) 3 Contents 115 Prospective Summary of Capital Purchases for the periods 2021- 5 Chair and Chief Executive’s Message 31 ($000) 6 Our Region 117 Prospective Reserve Balances for the periods 2021-31 ($000) 7 Your Councillors 118 Funding Impact Statements by Group of Activity 8 Vision and Community Outcomes 127 Prospective Funding Impact Statement to 30 June 2031 14 Strategic Challenges 128 Rates Funding Impact Statement for the Year Ending 30 June 15 Summary of the Infrastructure Strategy 2022 17 Finance Strategy 140 Sample Ratepayers for 2021-22 23 Summary of Rates and their changes 141 Statement of Accounting Policies to 30 June 2031 24 Sample Ratepayers for 2021-22 155 Significant Assumptions 169 River and Drainage Scheme Reserves Summary for the periods 2021-31 ($000) Section Two – Our Activities 171 River and Drainage Scheme Capex Renewal Reserves Summary 26 Land and Water Management for the periods 2021-31 ($000) 36 Flood Protection and Control Works 173 Annual Administrative Charges for the Year Ending 30 June 2022 48 Biosecurity and Biodiversity Protection 187 Long-term Plan Disclosure Statement for the periods 1 July 2021 55 Regional Leadership and Governance to 30 June 2031 69 Transport 77 Investment Section Five –Policies Section Three – Infrastructure Strategy 193 Revenue and Financing Policy 82 Infrastructure
    [Show full text]
  • Nzbotsoc No 64 June 2001
    NEW ZEALAND BOTANICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER NUMBER 64 JUNE 2001 New Zealand Botanical Society President: Jessica Beever Secretary/Treasurer: Anthony Wright Committee: Bruce Clarkson, Colin Webb, Carol West Address: c/- Canterbury Museum Rolleston Avenue CHRISTCHURCH 8001 Subscriptions The 2001 ordinary and institutional subs are $18 (reduced to $15 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). The 2001 student sub, available to full-time students, is $9 (reduced to $7 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). Back issues of the Newsletter are available at $2.50 each from Number 1 (August 1985) to Number 46 (December 1996), $3.00 each from Number 47 (March 1997) to Number 50 (December 1997), and $3.75 each from Number 51 (March 1998) onwards. Since 1986 the Newsletter has appeared quarterly in March, June, September and December. New Subscriptions are always welcome and these, together with back issue orders, should be sent to the Secretary/Treasurer (address above). Subscriptions are due by 28th February each year for that calendar year. Existing subscribers are sent an invoice with the December Newsletter for the next year's subscription which offers a reduction if this is paid by the due date. If you are in arrears with your subscription a reminder notice comes attached to each issue of the Newsletter. Deadline for next issue The deadline for the September 2001 issue (Number 65) is 25 August 2001. Please post contributions to: Joy Talbot 23 Salmond Street Christchurch 8002 Send contributions by e-mail to [email protected]. Files can be in WordPerfect (version 8 or earlier), MS Word (version 6 or earlier) or saved as RTF or ASCII.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alienation of Maori Land in the Ohura South Block
    OFFICIAL Wai 903, A59 The Alienation of Maori Land in the Ohura South block Part One: c.1886-1901 Steven Oliver and Tim Shoebridge September 2004 A Report Commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal Table of Contents List of tables 4 List of maps 4 Preface 5 Acknowledgements 5 Introduction 6 Chapter Overview 7 Methodology 8 1 The history of Ohura South lands to 1886 – Steven Oliver 18 1.1. Introduction 18 1.1.1. The Aotea and Ohura South blocks 18 1.2. The Maori tribal groups with interests in the land that became Ohura 19 South 1.2.1 Ngati Haua and Ohura South 20 1.2.2. Ngati Rangatahi, Ngati Wera and Ohura South 21 1.2.3. Ngati Maru and Ohura South 23 1.2.4. Ngati Urunumia and Ohura South 23 1.2.5. Other hapu and Ohura South 24 1.2.6. Report conclusions on the tribal groups of Ohura South 25 1.3. The political context of the Rohe Potae compact as it relates to the land 26 that became the Ohura South blocks 1.3.1. Early Pakeha incursions in the Rohe Potae, 1870s 27 1.3.2. The Rohe Potae compact in the 1880s 28 1.4. The Main Trunk Railway and land alienation in the district 31 1.5. The beginnings of Crown purchasing and the response of groups of 33 Maori with interests in the land 1.6. Conclusion 36 2 The Native Land Court hearings of 1886, 1888, and 1892 – Steven Oliver 38 2.1. Introduction 38 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Consent Activities for March and April 2013
    RESOURCE CONSENT ACTIVITIES FOR MARCH AND APRIL 2013 THE FACTS AND FIGURES Interesting Facts March and April received comparison: 1. The year has continued to be busy 11-12 year 10-11 year 09-10 year for the Consents Team. 97 99 96 2. Over the past two months the March and April resolved comparison: Consents Team has received 11-12 year 10-11 year 09-10 year 37 applications in March, and 120 107 101 28 applications in April. 3. The Consents Team granted 35 consents in March and 19 consents in April. 4. As at 30 April 2013 the Consents Team had 175 applications to process compared to 166 applications that were reported last Environment Committee. 5. The consent activity is steady at present and we expect that trend to continue and increase as the year progresses with consents going to hearings and consents coming in for water allocation. 6. The Consents Team is continuing to progress matters on the Territorial Authority Wastewater Treatment Plant and industry applications, a summary of which is provided later in this item. NOTIFIED APPLICATIONS IN MARCH AND APRIL 2013 7. During March we publicly notified the suite of applications received from Fonterra Co-operative Group relating to the Pahiatua Plant expansion. These applications were jointly notified with applications made to Tararua District Council with Horizons being the lead agency. Submissions closed on 17 April 2013 and a total of 44 submissions were received. 8. One consent application was limited notified in March, being an application received from Aorere Farms Partnership for a renewal of Discharge Permits (land and air) and a new Water Permit (groundwater) associated with their piggery operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule Ba Water Management Zones and Associated Values
    PART Ba2.2: How and Where Specific Water ^Management Values Apply USER NOTE: For map abbreviations – refer to the fold-out A3 VALUES KEY at the back of this Schedule. 1 Ecosystem Values 1 Note to the Hearing Panel: This key is conceptualised but has not been fully designed to work as it would in the plan as yet Proposed One Plan Ba-56 Schedule Ba Life Supporting Capacity (LSC) Value Map D:10 Ba:10 Visual guide to the distribution of the Life Supporting Capacity (LSC) vValue in water bodies* across the Manawatu-Wanganui Region. Proposed One Plan Ba-57 Schedule Ba Table D.4: Life Supporting Capacity Value by Management Zone/Sub-zone in the Manawatu-Wanganui Region Life Supporting Capacity Management Zone Sub zone Description* Classification Upper Manawatu Manawatu River - source to Weber Road (U23:751 027) HM Upper Manawatu Mangatewainui Mangatewainui River - source to Manawatu confluence (U23:829 086) HM Mangatoro Mangatoro Stream - source to Manawatu confluence (U23:810 027) HSS Weber-Tamaki Manawatu River - Weber Road to Tamaki confluence HM Weber-Tamaki Mangatera Mangatera Stream - source to Manawatu confluence (U23:737 025) HM Upper Tamaki Upper Tamaki Tamaki River - source to water supply weir (U23:709 111) UHS Upper Kumeti Upper Kumeti Kumeti Stream - source to Te Rehunga flow recorder (T23:663 052) UHS Tamaki-Hopelands Manawatu River - Tamaki confluence to Hopelands (T24: 616 899) HM Lower Tamaki Tamaki River - Water supply weir to Manawatu confluence (U23:709 002) HM Tamaki-Hopelands Lower Kumeti Kumeti Stream - Te Rehunga to Manawatu
    [Show full text]
  • Angler Usage of Lake and River Fisheries Managed by Fish & Game
    Angler usage of lake and river fisheries managed by Fish & Game New Zealand: results from the 2001/02 National Angling Survey NIWA Client Report: CHC2003-114 December 2003 NIWA Project: NZF03501 Angler usage of lake and river fisheries managed by Fish & Game New Zealand: results from the 2001/02 National Angling Survey Martin Unwin Katie Image Prepared for Fish & Game New Zealand NIWA Client Report: CHC2003- 114 December 2003 NIWA Project: NZF03501 National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd 10 Kyle Street, Riccarton, Christchurch P O Box 8602, Christchurch, New Zealand Phone +64-3-348 8987, Fax +64-3-348 5548 www.niwa.co.nz All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced or copied in any form, without the permission of the client. Such permission is to be given only in accordance with the terms of the client’s contract with NIWA. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage of material in any kind of information retrieval system. Contents Summary i 1. Introduction 3 1.1. Freshwater angling in New Zealand 3 2. Survey design and implementation 5 2.1. Scope, format, and objectives 5 2.2. Sampling design 7 2.2.1. Licence types and strata 7 2.2.2. Survey population 9 2.2.3. Sample sizes 9 2.2.4. Interview procedures 13 2.3. Data analysis 16 3. Results 17 3.1. Licence database 17 3.2. The replies 22 3.3. Usage estimates 22 3.3.1. Cross-boundary usage 24 3.3.2. Multi-reach rivers 26 3.3.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora and Vegetation of Pureora
    Flora and Vegetation of Pureora M. D. Wilcox The Auckland Botanical Society held an Easter Camp 2 5 April 1999 based at Pureora Lodge in the northern block of Pureora Forest Park 20 km east of Benneydale. Those who took part were: Enid Asquith Graeme Hambly Helen Lyons Stella Rowe Mike Wilcox Paul Asquith John Hobbs Morag Macdonald Pat Seyb Nancy Wilcox Daphne Blackshaw Val Hollard Simon OConnor Shirley Smith Pam Wilcox Quentin Blackshaw Marcel Horvath Helen Preston Jones Alison Wesley David Wilson Lisa Clapperton Frank Hudson Roslyn Prichard Barbara White Catherine Yong Brian Cumber Wyne Johns Juliet Richmond Bob White Maureen Young Colleen Foster John Jordan John Rowe BOTANICAL PROGRAMME Seven sites were visited and studied. These were : • Frost flats and valley of the Karamarama Stream a headwater of the Waipapa River adjoining the Pureora Lodge Waipapa Ecological Area Forest Walk Mire complex of Waipapa Ecological Area Pureora Mountain Totara Walk Buried Forest and Pikiariki tower area Waimiha Stream bog pine reserve A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO PUREORA Pureora Forest Park is administered by the carried out at Pureora on forest regeneration and Department of Conservation (DOC) and covers an selection logging (Beveridge 1964 1973 1983; area of 78 OOO hectares in the northern King Country. Herbert 1978 1980 1986; Smale et al. 1987 1998). It is an amalgamation of the former Wharepuhunga Selection logging was tried on a small scale at Tihoi Pouakani Pureora Hurakia Tihoi Taringamotu and and Pouakani for a short period before logging was Waituhi State Forests. Several Ecological Areas finally stopped altogether. (Mangatutu Waipapa Pikiariki Waimonoa Rata nunui Maramataha Nga Morehu Pureora Mountain The main geographic features which have shaped the Waihaha Whenuakura) have been designated within vegetation at Pureora are the inland elevated locality the Park representative of all the major vegetation with generally abundant moisture (180 rain days types (Nicholls 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • Riparian Management and Public Access – Policy RP2
    Riparian Management and Public Access – Policy RP2 RIPARIAN MANAGEMENT AND PUBLIC ACCESS - POLICY RP2.1 Introduction Many waterways within the District are significant to the District community. Traditionally, they have been a source of food, a place for recreation, a medium for transport and a source of scenic and spiritual value. The waterways also have a number of other social and economic values. Section 6 of the Act requires, as a matter of national importance, the preservation of the natural character of wetlands and lakes and rivers and their margins, and the protection of them from inappropriate subdivision, use and development. Council must recognise this matter in its District Plan. In recognising this matter, Council is mindful that the use of regulation may not be the most effective and efficient method available in all situations. The maintenance and enhancement of public access to and along lakes and rivers is also a matter that Council must recognise and provide for. Presently within the District, access to waterways is obtained by a number of mechanisms, including existing reserves, marginal strips, legal roads (formed and unformed), across public land and by agreement with landowners. The District has many waterways which are significant for recreation activities such as rafting, fishing and walking. The most significant recreational waterways have been specified in the Plan. For these waterways, it is the priority to ensure that good opportunities for gaining public access are provided. There are also a number of other waterways in the District where public access is desired. However, this may only be on certain areas of a waterway.
    [Show full text]