DOCSLIB.ORG

Railfuture Scotland News Issue 58

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Railfuture Scotland News Issue 58 SCOTTISH BRANCH NOTES No 58: Oct 2004 Autumn Meeting – Saturday 20th November at 14:00 Ken Sutherland writes: Councillor Alistair Watson was previously a train driver with Quality [Central Station] Hotel, Gordon Street, Glasgow ScotRail, and chaired the Land Services Committee (which has transport responsibility) with Glasgow City Council. He currently Speaker: Alistair Watson (SPT) is Chairman of the Strathclyde Passenger Transport Authority, and a key fi gure on the wider WESTRANS grouping of west Meeting for Members – Non-members welcome of Scotland councils, and doubtless current/previous COSLA experience. Ralph Barker and Ken Sutherland had a very positive Alistair will give a presentation, which will be followed by questions and discussion. discussion with Alistair in September 2003 - primarily on the At some stage there will be a break for refreshments (not at the start at 2 o’clock). Glasgow Airport Rail Link/CrossRail issues, as well as progress on the Hamilton-Larkhall/Anniesland-Maryhill re-openings. This is members’ half-yearly opportunity to discuss any matters of interest and to assist the committee in formulating the policy and campaign strategy of the Branch. Obviously whilst these projects are key elements in rail regenera- tion within the SPT area, Alistair would be delighted to discuss The last two meetings have focused on the east of Scotland a range of other issues/concerns here, as well as elsewhere in (Waverley Station and the Edinburgh Airport link). This meet- ing gives us an opportunity to focus on the west, as well as to Scotland, and the UK, as best he can - including Virgin Trains discuss matters of great importance nationally – for example developments (as Alistair now works for Virgin management). the First ScotRail franchise, the planned Transport for Scotland It’s getting late now, but if you have burning questions or issues, authority and its relation to the area transport organisations, could you drop a note of them to Ken Sutherland (12A Dirleton and UK matters such as the July 2004 DfT paper The Future of Gate, Bearsden, Glasgow, G61 1NP) as soon as possible. Rail. EDITORIAL traffi c listed above, but would also have provision for either light rail (trams from Dunfermline to Edinburgh?) or heavy rail. The bridge would be a two-span suspen- It’s been diffi cult to separate fact from fantasy over the last few months as new and sion bridge using the Beamer Rock for the middle pier. Technically it is possible, but revived schemes for public transport have been released. At last the summer is over, of course this is the most expensive Package. Once again ‘big projectitis’ is a factor. and perhaps the silly season for the media is now over too. FETA (which has Fife, Edinburgh and West Lothian council representatives on its board) would love the glory of creating this big project (cost about £750m), but the ‘Big Projectitis’ Packages 1 to 3 contain measures which have no glamour but would actually solve a lot of the problems. ‘Big projectitis’ is a part of the problem. There’s much more publicity mileage for government and local authorities in large expensive projects than there is in modest The dilemma for Railfuture is acute. With the 1996 proposal for a road-only bridge spending in upgrading and extending existing facilities. An example is the question it was easy for Railfuture to be against that proposal. With the possibility (but not the of Glasgow-Edinburgh. There are two routes and half of a third. Railfuture has long certainty) of this including a rail facility we have to consider the possible benefi ts for been campaigning for the Falkirk route to be upgraded especially by electrifi cation, rail. In a brief discussion at the last Committee Meeting we felt that for the moment which would solve many of the problems and bring the line back to the speed it was we should sit on the fence – we cannot automatically oppose a bridge which would many years ago. But it’s obviously much better publicity to propose a bullet train enhance the rail service, but know that there are many other measures at a much lower between the two cities (at a cost of £1.5bn to £4bn). This would be fantastic for a cost (like improving the signalling on the present Forth Rail Bridge) could make a few users of the route, but a very large number on that line are not travelling between signifi cant improvement to the services. Yet we would still oppose a new bridge which the two cities, they are travelling from Polmont to Edinburgh or Falkirk to Glasgow was for road traffi c only. The Scotsman Transport Correspondent wrote a clear sum- (or even Linlithgow to Croy). Then there has had to be the discussion as to whether mary of the situation complete with supplementary ‘For’ and ‘Against’ pieces. You a bullet train would need a completely new dedicated track or whether it could be can read this at http://news.scotsman.com/archive.cfm?id=1024962004 accommodated on the existing track. There is a consultation which closes on 30th September, and there is now a web-form And what about a tunnel under the Forth? I thought we had killed that idea in our for your views. Beware, the questions are loaded so that one tends to go through April 1st article in the last Branch News, but it’s surfaced again. It was even quoted saying ‘yes’ to most of the questions (it is generally blindingly obvious that most of in the press that TRANSform Scotland was in favour of a tunnel. The four members the things suggested make sense), it’s easy to go on and click ‘yes’ to build a new of Railfuture who are on the Board of TRANSform have never heard of this ‘policy’! bridge without realising that building a bridge has several variants in the plans. The Add to this Brian Soutar is backing a Forth Ferry – which would be a modern vessel least expensive is a new road bridge which, while relieving the load (physically) on and not like some of the previous ones (10 minutes from Kirkcaldy to Edinburgh the current road bridge, would inevitably mean more cars. The next option is to have has been quoted!). light rail included, but as far as I know there are no plans for any other light rail nearer to the estuary than Newbridge. The ultimate option is for a full road and heavy rail The Third Forth Bridge bridge, which is what FETA and especially Fife Council would like. Many feel that this is unrealistic and that it would not be funded, and also that the estimated costings In 1996 a proposal to build a second Forth Road Bridge was put down assisted by a do not include approaches by either road or rail to such a bridge. So be careful if you campaign of a number of bodies of which RDS was one. The group worked together just say ‘yes’ to a new bridge. Railfuture opposed the 1996 proposals for a new road under the name of the Forthright Alliance. Now FETA (Forth Estuary Transport Author- bridge saying that there were demand management measures which could make it ity) is resurrecting this plan, but with signifi cant modifi cations. Their argument is that unnecessary. This is still the case. However, we would not necessarily oppose a bridge the Forth Road Bridge is carrying far more than was envisaged when it was built and which included heavy rail. It would still be the case that many other measures at much there are problems in normal use exacerbated when repairs are necessary. They see a less expense could make the present Forth Bridge more effective. The reinstatement second road bridge as taking mainly public transport but also HGVs as normal, and of the Stirling-Kincardine line, for example, would take the coal trains off the Firth then other traffi c when the old road bridge is under repair or otherwise restricted. Bridge, and resignalling the bridge (and electrifi cation of the lines to the north) would This second road bridge is Package 4. Packages 1,2 & 3 propose a variety of meas- all reduce the need for another bridge. So be careful with the questions about a new ures, most of which are sustainable such as managing demand or developing public bridge – not any type of brige will do for us. transport which almost no-one would oppose. There is a big hike in the cost for Pack- If you ignore that and actually write a letter please send Railfuture Scotland a copy. age 4. which includes a new multi-modal bridge which would carry the kind of road The consultation is at www.feta.gov.uk. continued on page 2 Editorial - continued from page 1 “We are committed to improving rail services across Scotland and are making a real investment in rail infrastructure to improve reliability, punctu- First ScotRail ality, performance and enhance customer service. First have indicated that they are going to tread softly. After keeping quiet for some time after gaining the franchise, the indications now are that there will be a range Toilets and trolleys and new uniforms for staff seem to be top of the agenda at of improvements but no sudden sweeping changes. present. Hopefully it will develop to cover reliability, punctuality, seating capacity The initial statement said: and getting people where they want to be when they want to be there. Glasgow is to benefi t from later evening trains. This will not be of use to many “FirstGroup said customers would see improved punctuality and reliability, clubbers, but will help people wanting an evening in the city at a concert, opera or and increased passenger capacity.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Flying Into the Future Infrastructure for Business 2012 #4 Flying Into the Future
    Infrastructure for Business Flying into the Future Infrastructure for Business 2012 #4 Flying into the Future Flying into the Future têáííÉå=Äó=`çêáå=q~óäçêI=pÉåáçê=bÅçåçãáÅ=^ÇîáëÉê=~í=íÜÉ=fça aÉÅÉãÄÉê=OMNO P Infrastructure for Business 2012 #4 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ________________________________________ 5 1. GRowInG AVIATIon SUSTAInABlY ______________________ 27 2. ThE FoUR CRUnChES ______________________________ 35 3. ThE BUSInESS VIEw oF AIRpoRT CApACITY ______________ 55 4. A lonG-TERM plAn FoR GRowTh ____________________ 69 Q Flying into the Future Executive summary l Aviation provides significant benefits to the economy, and as the high growth markets continue to power ahead, flying will become even more important. “A holistic plan is nearly two thirds of IoD members think that direct flights to the high growth countries will be important to their own business over the next decade. needed to improve l Aviation is bad for the global and local environment, but quieter and cleaner aviation in the UK. ” aircraft and improved operational and ground procedures can allow aviation to grow in a sustainable way. l The UK faces four related crunches – hub capacity now; overall capacity in the South East by 2030; excessive taxation; and an unwelcoming visa and border set-up – reducing the UK’s connectivity and making it more difficult and more expensive to get here. l This report sets out a holistic aviation plan, with 25 recommendations to address six key areas: − Making the best use of existing capacity in the short term; − Making decisions about where new runways should be built as soon as possible, so they can open in the medium term; − Ensuring good surface access and integration with the wider transport network, in particular planning rail services together with airport capacity, not separately; − Dealing with noise and other local environment impacts; − Not raising taxes any further; − Improving the visa regime and operations at the UK border.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Transport Review Issue 18
    The Millennium Canal Project With funding from the Lottery and other sources, British Waterways Scotland ISSUE 18 has completed the SUMMER 2002 restoration of the Forth and ISSN 1462-8708 Clyde and Union Canals. This includes the spectacular Falkirk Wheel linking the Forth and Clyde Canal to the Union Canal extended for a mile further west from Falkirk and SPECIAL THEME passing in tunnel under the Glasgow Queen Street - Airports Consultation Edinburgh railway. A Visitor Centre has been established at the Wheel and there is an opportunity for a short boat Photos: Stenlake Publications trip from the Lower Basin to the Upper Basin. The project is designed to encourage mainly leisure activities including walking and cycling as well as boating. There is already evidence that it is encouraging sensitive development and greater activity along the two canals. The Wheel is a particular attraction. Timed to coincide with the formal opening by the Queen of the project as part of her Jubilee Tour, Stenlake Publishing have produced Scotland’s Millennium Canals by Guthrie Hutton. This 160 page hardback has over 250 illustrations (38 in colour) and is available for £25 (with special introductory price of £22.50) from Stenlake Publishing, 54 - 58 Mill Square, CATRINE, Ayrshire KA5 6RD. Tel/Fax: 01290 551122 www.stenlake.co.uk Ensure you receive Scottish Transport Review regularly One year’s subscription to the quarterly Review costs accordingly to the type of organisation. These rates £25 including postage (non UK residents £30). include multiple copies of the Review. Other Features Alternatively, single copies can be purchased for £8.
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands and Chilterns Route Utilisation Strategy Draft for Consultation Contents 3 Foreword 4 Executive Summary 9 1
    November 2010 West Midlands and Chilterns Route Utilisation Strategy Draft for Consultation Contents 3 Foreword 4 Executive summary 9 1. Background 11 2. Dimensions 20 3. Current capacity, demand, and delivery 59 4. Planned changes to infrastructure and services 72 5. Planning context and future demand 90 6. Gaps and options 149 7. Emerging strategy and longer-term vision 156 8. Stakeholder consultation 157 Appendix A 172 Appendix B 178 Glossary Foreword Regional economies rely on investment in transport infrastructure to sustain economic growth. With the nation’s finances severely constrained, between Birmingham and London Marylebone, as any future investment in transport infrastructure well as new journey opportunities between Oxford will have to demonstrate that it can deliver real and London. benefits for the economy, people’s quality of life, This RUS predicts that overall passenger demand in and the environment. the region will increase by 32 per cent over the next 10 This draft Route Utilisation Strategy (RUS) sets years. While Network Rail’s Delivery Plan for Control out the priorities for rail investment in the West Period 4 will accommodate much of this demand up Midlands area and the Chiltern route between to 2019, this RUS does identify gaps and recommends Birmingham and London Marylebone for the next measures to address these. 30 years. We believe that the options recommended Where the RUS has identified requirements for can meet the increased demand forecast by this interventions to be made, it seeks to do so by making RUS for both passenger and freight markets and the most efficient use of capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Strategic Rail Study Final Report
    Scottish Strategic Rail Study Final Report Scottish Strategic Rail Study Rail Strategic Scottish Transport Research Series Research Transport I SBN 0-7559- 3528- 4 ISSN 0950 2254 ISBN 0 7559 3528 4 Transport Research Price £5.00 Planning Group 9 780755 935284 ASTRON 207854 02-03 Further copies of this report are available priced £5.00. Cheques should be made payable to The Stationery Office Ltd and addressed to: The Stationery Office Bookshop 71 Lothian Road Edinburgh EH3 9AZ Tel: 0870 606 5566 Fax: 0870 606 5588 The views expressed in this report are those of the researchers and do not necessarily represent those of the Department or Scottish Ministers. © Crown Copyright 2003 Limited extracts from the text may be produced provided the source is acknowledged. For more extensive reproduction, please write to the Chief Research Officer at the Office of Chief Researcher, 3rd Floor West Rear, St Andrew’s House, Edinburgh EH1 3DG SCOTTISH STRATEGIC RAIL STUDY Final Report March 2003 Prepared for: Prepared by: Scottish Executive & Steer Davies Gleave Scottish Strategic Rail Study Project Steering Group Reception House 21 Lansdowne Crescent Edinburgh EH12 5EH [t] +44 (0)131-535 1101 [i] www.steerdaviesgleave.com Further copies of this report are available priced £5.00. Cheques should be made payable to The Stationery Office Ltd and addressed to: The Stationery Office Bookshop 71 Lothian Road Edinburgh EH3 9AZ Tel: 0870 606 5566 Fax: 0870 606 5588 The views expressed in this report are those of the researchers and do not necessarily represent those of the Department or Scottish Ministers.
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT Volume 1 | Glossary of Terms and List of Abbreviations
    London- WEST MIDLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT Volume 1 | Glossary of terms and list of abbreviations November 2013 VOL VOL ES 3.1.1 5 5 London- WEST MIDLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT Volume 1 | Glossary of terms and list of abbreviations November 2013 ES 3.1.1 High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. A report prepared for High Speed Two (HS2) Limited: High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, Eland House, Bressenden Place, London SW1E 5DU Details of how to obtain further copies are available from HS2 Ltd. Telephone: 020 7944 4908 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.hs2.org.uk High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the HS2 website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. Printed in Great Britain on paper containing at least 75% recycled fibre. Contents 1 Glossary of terms 1 2 List of abbreviations 26 2.1 Symbols and units of measurement 26 2.2 Acronyms and initialisms 28 HS2 London-West Midlands Environmental Statement | Glossary of terms and list of abbreviations 1 Glossary of terms Term Definition abnormal possessions See ‘possession’. absolute vibration criteria Limits (or trigger levels) that identify whether vibration is likely to impact on a person’s activities or the operation of vibration sensitive equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Nestrans REGIONAL TRANSPORT STRATEGY Refresh
    Appendix 1 2013 /2035 Nestrans REGIONAL TRANSPORT STRATEGY Refresh The Transport Partnership for Aberdeen City and Shire Appendix 1 Appendix 1 Contents 1 Introduction . 4 2 Summary of the Review Process . 5 3 Vision and Objectives . .6 4 Building on the Modern Transport System . 9 5 The Preferred Strategy Package . 12 The External Connections Strategy . 17 The Internal Connections Strategy . 24. The Strategic Policy Framework . .45 Proposals for Action . .54 Proposals Map: External Connections . 61 Proposals Map: Internal Connections – Region . 62 Proposals Map: Internal Connections – Aberdeen Area . 63 6 Achieving the Objectives . 65 The Transport Partnership for Aberdeen City and Shire Appendix 1 1 Introduction Nestrans’ Regional Transport Strategy (RTS) was approved by Scottish Ministers and published in 2008 and a separate delivery plan published in 2010. Since its initial publication in 2008 there have been a number of changes to the policy and economic context within which the RTS sits and a number of actions and policies emerging in recent years that the RTS needs to take account of. The most significant of these is the publication of the Structure Plan, the subsequent Strategic Development Plan (SDP) for the North East to 2035 which is currently being developed, the adoption of Local Development Plans for both Aberdeen City and Aberdeenshire and the adoption of a new Local Transport Strategy by Aberdeenshire in January 2012. The 2008 RTS was developed without the context of an up to date Structure Plan or Local Development Plans. These are now all in place and the RTS needs to support the delivery of these.
    [Show full text]
  • Il Regulatorregulator
    2001 Annual Return to the Rail RegulatorRegulator Operational Logged–up CRR Summary Performance Activity Volumes Enhancements Asset Condition NMS Network Reconciliation Capability RAILTRACK 2001 Annual Return to the Rail Regulator Page 2 of 166 Document Contents August 2001 Contents CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................................................................................................................5 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................................................................................................7 SECTION 1 – OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE..................................................................................................................................................8 SECTION 2 – ASSET CONDITION AND SERVICEABILITY ..........................................................................................................................19 Number of Broken Rails ................................................................................................................................................................................ 19 Number of Rail Defects................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to the Rail User Express We Continue with the Usual Roundup of News Items from Groups Around the UK. Please Keep Your Co
    October 2020 Welcome to the Rail User Express RUX may be forwarded, or items reproduced (quoting sources). Anyone may request it as an email attachment, or opt to be notified when it is posted on the Railfuture (Rf) website. There is no charge for either service. Following GDPR, Railfuture Membership now maintains both lists. Please advise if you no longer wish to receive RUX or the link, or if you know of anyone who would like to be added. **To comment on any item, please reply to the editor, not to the email address used for distribution. So the Government trumpets yet more blue sky thinking on ‘what needs to be done’, this time regarding strategic links, both rail and road. Led by the NR Chairman, and with environmental issues within his brief, rail should prevail. There is then no shortage of schemes ready for the off, but everything will be on hold until his report next year, when the pressing need is to crack on and get something done! Roger Smith We continue with the usual roundup of news items from groups around the UK. Please keep your contributions coming: they are all gratefully received. Friends of the Far North Line The recent timber train trial from Georgemas Junction to Inverness was highly successful. It demonstrated that the line has the capacity for regular timber traffic, although some sidings would need remedial work, and high payload wagons procured. Reinstatement of the Norbord factory connection on the Aberdeen line would be a game changer. There is now a lot of political and public interest in rail freight.
    [Show full text]
  • Response to the National Planning Framework 4 – Call for Ideas
    Response to the National Planning Framework 4 – Call for Ideas Introduction Nestrans is the statutory Regional Transport Partnership for Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire. We welcome this opportunity to contribute to the next National Planning Framework (NPF4) and would be happy to engage further on any aspects of our submission which the Scottish Government would like to explore. Nestrans is currently preparing a Regional Transport Strategy for the next twenty years, Nestrans 2040, and it is timely to be afforded the opportunity to contribute to the Call for Ideas with an indication of interventions which are likely to be contained within the RTS. Through the Aberdeen City Region Deal, a Strategic Transport Appraisal has been undertaken and the RTS builds on the developing scenarios and options from that appraisal. Nestrans works closely with constituent local authorities and Transport Scotland and the interventions which are being considered have been developed in conjunction with these bodies and through a consultation process consistent with STAG. Measures will be further developed through more detailed STAG appraisals and considered through the development of Local Development Plans (LDP), Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS), Local Transport Strategies (LTS) and Transport Scotland’s Strategic Transport projects Review (STPR2) as well as the process of work on the NPF4. Nestrans acknowledges the Scottish Government’s commitment of achieving Net Zero carbon by 2045, and this submission should make a significant contribution to that ambition as well as our own. 1 Name of proposed national North East Scotland Strategic Transport development Network enhancements. Improved International, national and intra-regional connections. Brief description of proposed Transformational change in strategic transport national development connections within the north east and connecting the region to the Central Belt, rest of the UK and Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Responses to Consultation on Initiatives Related to the Scotrail Franchise Extension
    ANALYSIS OF RESPONSES TO CONSULTATION ON INITIATIVES RELATED TO THE SCOTRAIL FRANCHISE EXTENSION Transport Scotland March 2009 Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Responses received 4 3 Analysis 5 4 The Consultation 6 5 Core services 7 6 Connecting to passengers and people 12 7 The future: looking forward 17 8 Conclusion 24 Appendix A 25 List of respondents Appendix B 27 Responses to Question 3 Appendix C 33 Responses to Question 10 March 2009 2 Consultation on initiatives related to the ScotRail franchise extension 1. Introduction 1.1 The Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Climate Change, Stewart Stevenson, announced on 3 April 2008 an extension to the existing ScotRail franchise to November 2014. As part of the extension deal a number of Priced Options were secured along with over £70m for reinvestment in the railways. 1.2 On 10 October 2008, Transport Scotland (TS) published Consultation on initiatives related to the ScotRail franchise extension. The consultation document sought the views of key rail industry stakeholders on how the Priced Options can be improved, how best they should be implemented and how the £70m secured for further services should be spent. 1.3 The consultation period began on 10 October 2008 and closed on 30 November 2008. 1.4 This report contains an analysis of responses to the consultation. The report does not contain a detailed description of every point raised in the consultation, but rather describes the main themes raised in answers to the consultation questions. 1.5 Transport Scotland is grateful to all those who submitted feedback. Where respondents have given permission, their consultation responses are published on the Transport Scotland website and in the Scottish Government library.
    [Show full text]
  • Railfuture Scotland
    WRITTEN EVIDENCE FROM RAILFUTURE SCOTLAND I am pleased to submit the following observations in further support of the response already submitted to Transport Scotland's 'Rail 2014' Public Consultation and in relation to the specific questions now asked: * The current efficiency and accessibility of the rail network in Scotland Greater technical efficiency can be achieved by logical 'infill' electrification schemes in Greater Glasgow/SPT area and Greater Edinburgh/Lothians/Fife SESTRAN area: followed by early commitment to main line electrification northward to Dundee - Aberdeen as a continuous investment programme. Some of those projects can be coherently and more economically integrated with the current EGIP works. Improved operational efficiency and better use of existing track capacity can be achieved by increasing more through- running west-east across central Scotland (e.g. utilising the City Union line /Crossrail - further discussed below). This would keep trains 'on the move' in passenger and revenue earning service, with reduction of unproductive terminal turn-around at Glasgow Central for many separate shorter distance as applies at present. Modest signalling investment in reduced 'headway' spacing between trains, could be achieved feasibly (and safely) to achieve to permit higher track utilisation without necessarily prejudicing reliability. Restoration of double track on heavily used/high frequency suburban routes e.g. Milngavie line would improve efficiency and reliability from out-of-sequence running at junctions which adversely impacts on the wider network Improved revenue efficiency can be achieved by higher train occupancy / passenger loading levels which themselves can encourage application of a more flexible and innovative fares policy as outlined in Q20 response to 'Rail 2014'.
    [Show full text]
  • Aberdeen to Inverness Transport Corridor Study
    Aberdeen to Inverness Transport Corridor Study Non Technical Executive Summary INTRODUCTION The Aberdeen to Inverness transport corridor is recognised as being of national strategic importance within the Strategic Transport Projects Review. It links the urban network of the major city of Aberdeen to the city of Inverness, a strategic node on the transport network of Scotland. The corridor provides connections to international gateways at Aberdeen and Inverness airports and the major sea port of Aberdeen. This corridor is important in supporting the continued economic growth of the two cities and connecting the rural communities within the corridor to those economic centres and to each other. The transport network in the corridor comprises the A96 trunk road and the Aberdeen to Inverness railway line. The purpose of this study is to undertake a Pre-Appraisal assessment in accordance with the Scottish Transport Appraisal Guidance (STAG) to: • identify the problems and opportunities along the corridor; • to establish transport planning objectives that seek to address these problems; and • to generate and sift a range of transport improvement options that have the capacity to deliver the established transport planning objectives. Options emerging from the sifting process will be considered subsequently as part of the Strategic Transport Projects Review (STPR). The Scottish Executive, Transport Scotland, Hitrans and Nestrans jointly commissioned this study. In May 2006, Scott Wilson was appointed by the Scottish Executive to carry out the study on behalf of the commissioning parties. The study was carried out under the direction of a Steering Group comprising representatives from the Scottish Executive, Transport Scotland, Hitrans, Nestrans, Highland Council, Moray Council, Aberdeenshire Council, Aberdeen City Council, Highlands and Islands Enterprise and Scottish Enterprise Grampian.
    [Show full text]