DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Book

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Book ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY IN WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 1 Rafik Hirji and Jobo Molapo SOE Zambezi – CEP 2 CONTENTS 1.1 INTRODUCTION 3 1.2 OBJECTIVES OF THIS TECHNICAL REPORT 5 1.3 KEY WATER RESOURCES ISSUES 5 1.3.1 Water scarcity in southern Africa 6 1.3.2 Emerging policy reforms 7 1.3.3 Integration of environmental sustainability criteria 7 1.4 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR SUSTAINABILITY 10 1.4.1 A system in crisis: a degrading and undervalued resources base 10 1.4.2 Ecosystem goods and services 10 1.4.3 Elements of sustainable water resources management: balancing use and protection 11 1.5 CHALLENGES TO SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF WATER RESOURCES 11 1.5.1 Conceptual challenge 11 1.5.2 Absence of environmental quality criteria to define sustainability in the water sector 12 1.5.3 Inadequate economic analysis 12 1.5.4 Ineffective environmental impact assessment process 12 1.5.5 Inadequate consultations and participation during the EIA processes 12 1.5.6 Environmentally unsustainable water management policies 13 1.5.7 Environmental regulations for international waters 14 1.5.8 Capacity constraints 15 1.5.9 Emerging trends 15 1.6 OPPORTUNITIES TO BUILD UPON 15 1.6.1 Consensus on principles of sound water resources management 15 1.6.2 International agreements, conventions and initiatives 16 1.6.3 Regional water management and environmental initiatives 17 1.6.4 National water policy, legal and institutional reforms 17 1.7 AN OVERVIEW OF OTHER PARTS OF THE REPORT 19 Part 1 Water Resources Development and Management: Striving for a Sustainable Balance 19 Part 2 Water Resources Management: Safeguarding the Resource Base 19 Part 3 Legal and Institutional Framework: Mainstreaming the Environment in Water Resources Management 19 Part 4 Lessons Learned and Recommendations for the Way Forward 19 REFERENCES 20 3 ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY IN WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 1.1 INTRODUCTION (b) sustainable water resources management must balance between the short term needs of the people for The Southern African Development Community (SADC) their social and economic development and the protec- commissioned the preparation of this technical report on tion of the natural resource base. Defining and Mainstreaming Environmental Protection is a longer term goal for ensuring that the Sustainability in Water Resources Management in resource base is utilized wisely so that it can continue to Southern Africa to contribute to the public policy dis- provide benefits for improving people’s livelihoods and course and to support the development of practical quality of life, reducing poverty and fostering economic approaches for the integration of environmental quality growth into the future on a sustainable basis. objectives in the planning and management of the water The report is based on two fundamental assumptions sector.1 The report addresses a key SADC objective, “to that link water and environment to poverty alleviation. achieve sustainable utilization of natural resources and G First, strategies to reduce poverty should not lead to effective protection of the environment”, and supports further degradation of water resources or ecological the integration of environmental quality objectives into functions and services. the implementation of the SADC Protocol on Shared G Second, sustainable water use and improved environ- Watercourses and the Regional Strategic Action Plan mental quality should contribute to reducing poverty. (RSAP) for Integrated Water Resources Development and Table 1.1 below summarizes the elements of a basic Management in the SADC Countries (1999-2004). This framework for linking water, environment, and poverty. A technical report is also a SADC contribution to the United broad definition of poverty is adopted, that extends well Nation’s World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) in Johannesburg Linkages between Water, Environment and Poverty Table 1.1 in August 2002 and to the New Partner- Dimensions of poverty Examples of water and environmental linkages ship for Africa’s Development (NEPAD). The report provides policy guidance Income and Consumption Access to water for productive use, access to natural resources, sustainable growth and practical tools for addressing the Inequality and Equity Secure tenure and access to natural resources, specific challenges related to the water, water rights and entitlements environment and poverty nexus. The Sustainable Livelihoods Sustainable land and water use practices Health Water quality, safe drinking water and sanitation, central messages of the report are that, protection against water-borne disease (a) effective development and effec- Security and Vulnerability Improved disaster preparedness and response, water harvesting and conservation tive management of water resources are Inclusion and Empowerment Participation, devolution of ownership, rights and essential for sustainable growth and responsibilities to water users, community groups, poverty reduction in the SADC region, basin organizations, local governments and 1 This report is a joint initiative of the SADC Environment and Land Management Sector (ELMS) and the SADC Water Sector. 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY IN WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT beyond income and consumption, to include inequality, stream communities. Often, these voiceless communities health, opportunity, livelihoods and vulnerability. are excluded during the planning and operations of major Understanding the biophysical, social, and socioeco- hydraulic infrastructure, and in this regard, the report nomic linkages is critical to addressing the environment, underscores their important role in project planning and water, and poverty nexus because in many cases it is the management decision-making. The report, however, does poor, who are most directly or indirectly dependent on not focus on individual water sector issues (such as terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems for their livelihoods and domestic water supply or irrigation or hydropower) or on wellbeing. groundwater; and it does not focus on climate variability “Because of social and economic disadvantages, the or climate change considerations. poor often live in fringe areas, where access to potable supplies and adequate sanitation facili- Misconceptions about water Box 1.1 and water-dependent ecosystems ties is limited and where higher mortality, mor- bidity, and disease rates prevail. Or they live in There are a number of misconceptions about water and highly vulnerable areas (floodplains and water-dependent ecosystems that are so widespread they are often taken as fact by various sectors and individuals, degraded watersheds), where buffering capaci- including in some cases, at high levels of decision-making: ty to natural and anthropogenic shocks and G That water originates from pipes, and not from disasters is limited. Also, poor downstream watersheds, springs and aquifers. G That wetlands are wastelands with no social or communities relying on flood recession agri- economic value to society. culture, dry season livestock water supplies, G That freshwater biodiversity is not important to the region G fodder, firewood, or fishing are often left out That water flowing into the sea is wasted water. G That downstream impacts of major water projects are when major upstream water allocation or insignificant and therefore should be ignored. urban/industrial development decisions are G That environmental management is a concern of made without adequate considerations of outsiders and not of the region’s people. G That environmental management provides few downstream uses.” (Hirji and Ibrekk 2001: 2) benefits to society, but is costly and poses a huge The overall goal of the report is to inform economic burden. G the policy and decision makers about the com- That existing Environmental Impact Assessment policies and laws are sufficient for integrating environ- plex biophysical, social and economic dimen- mental sustainability criteria into water resources sions of environmental sustainability in the planning and management decision-making. water sector The report underscores the fact that sustain- able management of water resources must incorporate at an operational level, the ecological, economic and social considerations into water resources planning and manage- ment decision-making. Another goal is to, G provide policy guidance, practical approaches and operational tools for developing and managing the region’s basic and vital resource – water – in an environmentally sustainable manner, G share successful lessons and experiences about environmentally sustainable water resources management practices from the region, and G define in operational terms the elements of “environ- mentally sustainable water resources management”. The report attempts to dispel myths about water and dependent ecosystems (Box 1.1) in order to assist policy D. Martin, APG makers and water managers to make informed project This water well, built over 1,000 years ago at Unguja Ukuu in decisions on how to address significant adverse impacts southern Zanzibar and still in use, illustrates the long history of on important natural systems and livelihoods of down- development and management of resources in the SADC region. A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 5 This chapter provides the conceptual framework for the ing from direct water development activities, as well as report. It begins with the objectives of the report, and an indirect land use and other activities within the river overview of the key water
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019–2020 ANNUAL REPORT 2019–2020 Annual Report
    2019–2020 ANNUAL REPORT 2019–2020 Annual report MOUNT ISA WATER BOARD ANNUAL REPORT 2019/2020 A This annual report provides information about MIWB’s financial and non-financial performance during 2019–20. The report describes MIWB’s performance in meeting the bulk water needs of existing customers and ensuring the future bulk water needs of North West Queensland are identified and met. The report has been prepared in accordance with the Financial Accountability Act 2009, which requires that all statutory bodies prepare annual reports and table them in the Legislative Assembly each financial year; the Financial and Performance Management Standard 2019, which provides specific requirements for information to be disclosed in annual reports; other legislative requirements and the Queensland Government’s Annual Report requirements for Queensland Government agencies for 2019–20. This report has been prepared for the Minister for Natural Resources, Mines and Energy to submit to Parliament. It has also been prepared to inform stakeholders including Commonwealth, state and local governments, industry and business associations and the community. MIWB is committed to providing accessible services to Queenslanders from all culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. If you have difficulty in understanding the annual report, you can contact MIWB on (07) 4740 1000 and an interpreter will be arranged to effectively communicate the report to you. Mount Isa Water Board proudly acknowledges Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community and their rich culture and pays respect to their Elders past, present and emerging. We acknowledge Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as Australia’s first peoples and as the Traditional Owners and custodians of the land and water on which we rely.
    [Show full text]
  • NW Queensland Water Supply Strategy Investigation
    NW Queensland Water Supply Strategy Investigation Final Consultant Report 9 March 2016 Document history Author/s Romy Greiner Brett Twycross Rohan Lucas Checked Adam Neilly Approved Brett Twycross Contact: Name Alluvium Consulting Australia ABN 76 151 119 792 Contact person Brett Twycross Ph. (07) 4724 2170 Email [email protected] Address 412 Flinders Street Townsville QLD 4810 Postal address PO Box 1581 Townsville QLD 4810 Ref Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Methodology 2 2.1 Geographic scope and relevant regional characteristics 2 2.2 Situation and vulnerability analysis 3 2.3 Multi criteria decision analysis 5 2.3.1 The principles of multi criteria decision making 5 2.3.2 Quantitative criteria 7 2.3.3 Qualitative criteria 8 3 Situation analysis: Water demand and supply 12 3.1 Overview 12 3.2 Urban water demand and supply 14 3.2.1 Mount Isa 14 3.2.2 Cloncurry 15 3.3 Mining and mineral processing water demand and supply 16 3.3.1 Mount Isa precinct 16 3.3.2 Cloncurry precinct 17 3.4 Agriculture 18 3.5 Uncommitted water 19 3.6 Projected demand and water security 19 3.7 Vulnerability to water shortages 20 4 Water infrastructure alternatives 21 4.1 New water storage in the upper Cloncurry River catchment 23 4.1.1 Cave Hill Dam 23 4.1.2 Black Fort Dam 25 4.1.3 Painted Rock Dam 26 4.1.4 Slaty Creek 27 4.1.5 Combination of Black Fort Dam and Slaty Creek 27 4.2 Increasing the capacity of the Lake Julius water supply 28 4.3 Utilising currently unused water storage infrastructure 30 4.3.1 Corella Dam 30 4.3.2 Lake Mary Kathleen 31 5 Ranking
    [Show full text]
  • Country Technical Note on Indigenous Peoples' Issues
    Country Technical Note on Indigenous Peoples’ Issues United Republic of Tanzania Country Technical Notes on Indigenous Peoples’ Issues THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA Submitted by: IWGIA Date: June 2012 Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IFAD concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The designations ‗developed‘ and ‗developing‘ countries are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. All rights reserved Acronyms and abbreviations ACHPR African Commission on Human and Peoples‘ Rights ASDS Agricultural Sector Development Strategy AU African Union AWF African Wildlife Fund CBO Community Based Organization CCM Chama Cha Mapinduzi (Party of the Revolution) CELEP Coalition of European Lobbies for Eastern African Pastoralism CPS Country Partnership Strategy (World Bank) COSOP Country Strategic Opportunities Paper (IFAD) CWIP Core Welfare Indicator Questionnaire DDC District Development Corporation FAO Food and Agricultural Organization FBO Faith Based Organization FGM Female Genital Mutilation FYDP Five Year Development Plan
    [Show full text]
  • The Populat Kenya
    £ 4 World Population Year THE POPULAT KENYA - UGANDA - TANZANIA CI.CR.E.D. Senes THE POPULATION OF KENYA- UGANDA - TANZANIA SIMEON OMINDE Professor of Geography and Head of Department, University of Nairobi 1974 World Population Year C.I.C.R.E.D Series This study was initiated and financed by C.I.C.R.E.D. (Committee for International Coordination of National Research in Demography) to coincide with 1974 World Population Year. © Simeon Ominde © C.I.C.R.E.D. First published 1975 Printed in Kenya by Kenya Litho Ltd., P.O. Box 40775, Changamwe Road, Nairobi. CONTENTS Page PREFACE ¡v Chapter 1 The Area and Estimates of Population Growth 1 Chapter 2 Components of Population Growth 11 Chapter 3 Migration 40 Chapter 4 Population Composition 59 Chapter 5 Population Distribution 73 Chapter 6 Urbanization 88 Chapter 7 Labour Force 97 Chapter 8 Population Projection 105 Chapter 9 Population Growth and Socio-Economic Development 115 Conclusion 123 PREFACE This monograph presents the population situation in the area covered by Tanzania, Uganda and Kenya. The material has been prepared at the request of CICRED, as part of its contribution to the objectives of the World Population Year, 1974. In common with other developing countries of Africa, the East African countries are becoming acutely aware of the importance of rapid population growth and its significance to the attainment of development objectives. It has become increasingly clear that with the current rates of growth and the limited resources, the burden of socio-economic development programmes has become more serious. The search for alternative strategies to development must therefore focus attention on the impact of accelerating growth rate which leads to retardation of the rate of economic and social development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Labor Market Impacts of Forced Migration
    WP GLM|LIC Working Paper No. 7 | March 2016 The Labor Market Impacts of Forced Migration Isabel Ruiz (University of Oxford) Carlos Vargas-Silva (COMPAS, University of Oxford) GLM|LIC Working Paper No. 7 | March 2016 The Labor Market Impacts of Forced Migration Isabel Ruiz (University of Oxford) Carlos Vargas-Silva (COMPAS, University of Oxford) GLM|LIC c/o IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Schaumburg-Lippe-Straße 5–9 53113 Bonn, Germany Phone: +49-228-3894-0 Fax: +49-228-3894-510 Email: [email protected] GLM|LIC Working Paper No. 7 | March 2016 ABSTRACT The Labor Market Impacts of Forced Migration* During the 1990s the Kagera region of Tanzania experienced a forced migration shock. A series of geographical barriers led to a higher concentration of forced migrants in some parts of the region relative to others, resulting in a natural experiment. Using panel data (pre and post forced migration shock), we find that greater exposure to the refugee shock resulted in Tanzanians having a lower likelihood of working outside the household as employees. However, employees more affected by the shock had a higher probability of being in professional occupations and being part of a pensions program. JEL Classification: F22, J61, O15 Keywords: forced migration, refugees, labor markets, Tanzania Corresponding author: Carlos Vargas-Silva COMPAS University of Oxford 58 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 6QS United Kingdom E-mail: [email protected] * This work was supported by the UK Department of International Development (DFID) and the Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) Growth and Labor Markets in Low Income Countries Programme (GLM | LIC).
    [Show full text]
  • Social and Economic Transformation in Tanzania and South Korea: Ujamaa and Saemaul Undong in the 1970S Compared
    Social and Economic Transformation in Tanzania and South Korea: Ujamaa and Saemaul Undong in the 1970s Compared Yong Yoon and Robert Mudida Julius Nyerere and Park Chung-hee carried out ambitious and important social and economic reforms for rural development in the 1970s in Tanzania and South Korea, respectively. The reforms not only affected the livelihood of rural people but also had long- reaching impact on the entire nations. Despite the visionary and generally benevolent rulers’ policy initiatives, the economic results of the rural development programs in the two countries cannot be more different. This paper contrasts and explores the importance of the nature of the transformation strategy and processes, as brought about by differences in leadership as well as in political philosophies and developmental goals, as a possible explanation for the drastically different economic outcomes of Tanzania’s Ujamaa and South Korea’s Saemaul Undong. Keywords: Tanzania, South Korea, Ujamaa; Saemaul Undong, Rural development, Social innovation, Economic transformation JEL Classifications: O35, O57, P10, P52, N95, N97 Yong Yoon, Corresponding Author, Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University, Phayathai Road, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand. (Tel) +66-2- 218-6188, (Email) [email protected]. Robert Mudida, Associate Professor and Director, Strathmore Institute for Public Policy and Governance, Strathmore University, Ole Sangale, Madaraka, P.O. Box 59857 – 00200, Nairobi, Kenya. (Tel) +254-703-034-414, (Email) [email protected]. [Seoul
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty in Tanzania: Comparisons Across Administrative Regions
    POVERTY IN TANZANIA: COMPARISONS ACROSS ADMINISTRATIVE REGIONS AN INTERIM REPORT Mkenda A.F, Luvanda E.G, Rutasitara L and A. Naho April 4, 2004 ii Table of Contents POVERTY IN TANZANIA: COMPARISONS ACROSS ADMINISTRATIVE REGIONS ........ i 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................. 1 2 Motivation of the Study .......................................................................................................... 1 3 Methodology........................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 The Coverage ................................................................................................................. 4 3.2 The Data......................................................................................................................... 5 3.3 Poverty Indices............................................................................................................... 6 3.4 Adult Equivalent Scales ................................................................................................. 6 3.5 Poverty Lines ................................................................................................................. 8 4 Empirical Results.................................................................................................................... 9 4.1 Head Count Ratios......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Framework December 2019 CS9570 12/19
    Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy Queensland bulk water opportunities statement Part A – Strategic framework December 2019 CS9570 12/19 Front cover image: Chinaman Creek Dam Back cover image: Copperlode Falls Dam © State of Queensland, 2019 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Hinze Dam Queensland bulk water opportunities statement Contents Figures, insets and tables .....................................................................iv 1. Introduction .............................................................................1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Context 1 1.3 Current scope 2 1.4 Objectives and principles 3 1.5 Objectives 3 1.6 Principles guiding Queensland Government investment 5 1.7 Summary of initiatives 9 2. Background and current considerations ....................................................11 2.1 History of bulk water in Queensland 11 2.2 Current policy environment 12 2.3 Planning complexity 13 2.4 Drivers of bulk water use 13 3.
    [Show full text]
  • A Contextual Analysis for Village Land Use Planning in Tanzania's
    A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Tanzania’s Bagamoyo and Chalinze districts, Pwani region and Mvomero and Kilosa districts, Morogoro region Sustainable Rangeland Management Project ILRI PROJECT REPORT ISBN: 92-9146-586-0 The International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) works to improve food and nutritional security and reduce poverty in developing countries through research for efficient, safe and sustainable use of livestock. Co-hosted by Kenya and Ethiopia, it has regional or country offices and projects in East, South and Southeast Asia as well as Central, East, Southern and West Africa. ilri.org CGIAR is a global agricultural research partnership for a food-secure future. Its research is carried out by 15 research centres in collaboration with hundreds of partner organizations. cgiar.org A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Pwani and Morogoro regions of Tanzania i ii A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Pwani and Morogoro regions of Tanzania A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Tanzania’s Bagamoyo and Chalinze districts, Pwani region and Mvomero and Kilosa districts, Morogoro region Sustainable Rangeland Management Project Emmanuel Sulle and Wilbard Mkama Editor: Fiona Flintan (International Livestock Research Institute) July 2019 A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Pwani and Morogoro regions of Tanzania iii ©2019 International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) ILRI thanks all donors and organizations which globally support its work through their contributions to the CGIAR Trust Fund This publication is copyrighted by the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). It is licensed for use under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources and Pathways of Contaminants to the Leichhardt River Sources and Pathways of Contaminants to the Leichhardt River
    Lead Pathways Study – Water Sources and Pathways of Contaminants to the Leichhardt River Sources and Pathways of Contaminants to the Leichhardt River 2 Centre for Mined Land Rehabilitation – Sustainable Minerals Institute Sources and Pathways of Contaminants to the Leichhardt River Lead Pathways Study – Water Sources and Pathways of Contaminants to the Leichhardt River 11 May 2012 Report by: Barry Noller1, Trang Huynh1, Jack Ng2, Jiajia Zheng1, and Hugh Harris3 Prepared for: Mount Isa Mines Limited Private Mail Bag 6 Mount Isa 1 Centre for Mined Land Rehabilitation, The University of Queensland, Qld 4072 2 National Research Centre for Environmental Toxicology, The University of Queensland Qld 4008 3 School of Chemistry and Physics, The University of Adelaide SA 5005 Centre for Mined Land Rehabilitation – Sustainable Minerals Institute 3 Sources and Pathways of Contaminants to the Leichhardt River This report was prepared by the Centre for Mined Land Rehabilitation, Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072. The report was independently reviewed by an environmental chemistry specialist, Dr Graeme Batley. Dr Graeme Batley, B.Sc. (Hons 1), M.Sc, Ph.D, D.Sc Chief Research Scientist in CSIRO Land and Water’s Environmental Biogeochemistry research program Dr Graeme Batley is the former director and co-founder of the Centre for Environmental Contaminants Research (CECR), a program that brings together CSIRO’s extensive expertise in research into the contamination of waters, sediments and soils. He is also a Fellow of the Royal Australian Chemical Institute, member Australasian Society for Ecotoxicology and Foundation President and Board Member of the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) Asia/Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Access to Food in Tanzania: a Food Basket Approach, EIB-135, U.S
    United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Measuring Access to Food Service Economic in Tanzania: A Food Basket Information Bulletin Number 135 Approach February 2015 Nancy Cochrane and Anna D’Souza United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service www.ers.usda.gov Access this report online: www.ers.usda.gov/publications/eib-economic-information-bulletin/eib135 Download the charts contained in this report: • Go to the report’s index page www.ers.usda.gov/publications/ eib-economic-information-bulletin/eib135 • Click on the bulleted item “Download eib135.zip” • Open the chart you want, then save it to your computer Recommended citation format for this publication: Cochrane, Nancy, and Anna D’Souza. Measuring Access to Food in Tanzania: A Food Basket Approach, EIB-135, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, February 2015. Cover images: Nancy Cochrane, USDA, Economic Research Service. Use of commercial and trade names does not imply approval or constitute endorsement by USDA. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and, where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Distribution, Status and Ecology of the Star Finch Neochmia Ruficauda in Queensland
    AUSTRALIAN 278 BIRD WATCHER AUSTRALIAN BIRD WATCHER 1998, 17, 278-289 A Review of the Distribution, Status and Ecology of the Star Finch Neochmia ruficauda in Queensland by GLENN H.OLMES, P.O. Box 1246, Atherton, Queensland 4883 Summary The Star Finch Neochmia ruficauda has been recorded in 35-37 one-degree blocks in Queensland. Most records concern the Edward River, Princess Charlotte Bay and Rockharnpton districts. Viable populations are probably now restricted to Cape York Peninsula. Typical habitat comprises grasslands or grassy open woodlands, near permanent water or subject to regular inundation. Some sites support shrubby regrowth caused by the clearing of formerly unsuitable denser woodlands. Recorded food items are all seeds, of five grass species and one sedge. Precise nest records are few, but large numbers of juveniles have been observed during the last two decades at Aurukun, Pormpuraaw, Kowanyarna and Princess Charlotte Bay. Threatening processes are discussed; livestock grazing in riparian situations is considered the most deleterious. Introduction The distribution, status and ecology of the Star Finch Neochmia ruficauda in Queensland require urgent review. Endemic to northern and eastern Australia, its populations have declined in most regions. Available evidence suggests that the greatest contraction in its distribution has occurred in Queensland (e.g. Blakers et al. 1984). It is extinct in New South Wales, but its distribution there was only oflirnited extent (Holmes 1996). The Star Finch is protected stringently in Queensland because it is gazetted as Endangered under the Nature Conservation Act 1992. This categorisation takes due account of 'biological vulnerability, extent of current knowledge ... and management needs'.
    [Show full text]